08.12.2012 Views

Seventh International Congress of Hymenopterists

Seventh International Congress of Hymenopterists

Seventh International Congress of Hymenopterists

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Seventh</strong><br />

<strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010<br />

Programme and Abstracts<br />

List <strong>of</strong> Participants<br />

Editor: George Melika<br />

Kszeg<br />

HUNGARY


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Organizing Committee<br />

János Káldy,<br />

Chair, local Organizing Committee,<br />

Plant Protection & Soil Conservation Directorate <strong>of</strong> County Vas, Hungary<br />

James B. Wooley,<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA<br />

Michael J. Sharkey,<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, University <strong>of</strong> Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 40546, USA<br />

Andrew R. Deans<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA<br />

Katja Seltmann<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA<br />

Joseph C. Fortier<br />

Gonzaga University, Jesuit Community, Spokane, WA, USA<br />

István Mikó<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA<br />

Zsolt Pénzes<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Ecology, Szeged University, Szeged, Hungary<br />

György Csóka<br />

Hungarian Forest Research Institute, Mátrafüred Research Station, 3232 Mátrafüred, Hungary<br />

Sándor Cssz<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Zoology, Hungarian Natural History Museum, Budapest, Hungary<br />

Dominique Zimmermann<br />

Natural History Museum, Vienna, Austria<br />

George Melika<br />

Plant Protection & Soil Conservation Directorate <strong>of</strong> County Vas, Hungary<br />

Scientific Committee<br />

James B. Woolley, Texas A&M University, USA, President, ISH<br />

Michael J. Sharkey, University <strong>of</strong> Kentucky, USA, President-Elect, ISH<br />

Andrew D. Austin, University <strong>of</strong> Adelaide, Australia<br />

Seán G. Brady, Smithsonian Institution, USA<br />

Andrew R. Deans, North Carolina State University, USA, Secretary, ISH<br />

Field Jeremy, University <strong>of</strong> Sussex, UK<br />

Michael Ohl, Museum für Naturkunde, Humboldt University Berlin, Germany<br />

Donald L.J. Quicke, Imperial College, UK<br />

Alex Raznitsyn, Institute <strong>of</strong> Paleontology, Russia<br />

Gratefull thanks to Dr. Gellért Gólya, Ministry <strong>of</strong> Agriculture and Rural Development <strong>of</strong> Hungary,<br />

Department for Plant Protection and Soil Conservation, for supporting the publication <strong>of</strong> this brochure.<br />

Note: This publication is not intended to form part <strong>of</strong> the permanent scientific record; it is therefore<br />

not a valid publication for the purposes <strong>of</strong> biological nomenclature.<br />

2


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

P r o g r a m m e<br />

(presenter in bold)<br />

Sunday 20 June 2010 Arriving and Registration<br />

Monday 21 June 2010<br />

8:30 - 8:45 James B. Woolley, George Melika Welcome and Opening<br />

Symposium I. A Myriad <strong>of</strong> Morphology<br />

8:45 - 10:05 Chair: Matthew J. Yoder<br />

08:45 Matthew J. Yoder – Introduction<br />

08:50 Lars Vilhelmsen, Perrichot, V. & Shaw, S.R. -- Past and present diversity and<br />

distribution in the parasitic wasp family Megalyridae<br />

09:05 Hannes Baur, Doczkal, D. & Schweizer, M. -- Morphological and molecular analysis<br />

<strong>of</strong> Vanhornia leileri Hedqvist (Proctotrupoidea, Vanhorniidae), a neglected European<br />

parasitoid <strong>of</strong> eucnemid beetles<br />

09:20 Zoya Yefremova, Mishchenko, A. & Yegorenkova, E. -- Biology and morphology <strong>of</strong><br />

immature stages <strong>of</strong> some species <strong>of</strong> Eulophidae (Hym.: Chalcidoidea), parasitoids<br />

associated with leafminers (Lep.: Gracillariidae and Gelechiidae)<br />

09:35 István Mikó, Vilhelmsen, L.B. Gibson, G.A.P., Yoder, M.J., Seltmann, K., Bertone,<br />

M. & Deans, A.R. -- Towards a compendium <strong>of</strong> Hymenoptera muscles<br />

09:50 Deepak D. Barsagade -- Surface ultra-sculptural studies on the antenna, mouth parts<br />

and external genitalia <strong>of</strong> the Carpenter ant, Camponotus compressus (Hymenoptera:<br />

Formicidae)<br />

10:05 - 10:30 C<strong>of</strong>fee and Tea Break<br />

10:30 - 12:00 Chair: Katja Seltmann<br />

10:30 Ekaterina Shevtsova & Hansson, C. -- Structural colours in Hymenoptera wings<br />

10:45 Seán G. Brady -- The importance <strong>of</strong> morphology in the age <strong>of</strong> molecular<br />

hymenopteran phylogenetics<br />

11:00 Gérard Delvare -- Looking inside the head capsule <strong>of</strong> Chalcididae provides<br />

informative characters to infer their phylogeny<br />

11:15 Matthew J. Yoder, Mikó, I., Bertone, M.A., Seltmann, K. & Deans, A.R. -- Four<br />

years later: the Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology, an overview and call for<br />

participation II<br />

11:30 Katja Seltmann, Bertone, M.A., Yoder, M.J., Mikó, I., Macleod, E.S., Ernst, A. &<br />

Deans, A.R. -- Building the Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology through exploration <strong>of</strong><br />

the Journal <strong>of</strong> Hymenoptera Research<br />

11:45 Group Discussion. Morphology's role in the future <strong>of</strong> hymenopteran research<br />

12:00 - 13:30 Lunch<br />

3


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Symposium II. Scientific publication, informatics and DNA barcoding<br />

13:30 - 14:45 Chair: Donat Agosti<br />

13:30 Yu Dicky & Michael Sharkey -- BracBank – a specimen and taxon-based program to<br />

facilitate taxonomic research<br />

13:45 Donat Agosti, Catapano, T. & Penev, L. -- The future <strong>of</strong> taxonomic communication<br />

and publishing<br />

14:00 James B. Woolley & Michael Sharkey -- Group Discussion: A new model for the<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Hymenoptera Research<br />

14:30 Smith, M.A., José Fernández-Triana, Achterberg van K., Goulet, H., Hallwachs, W.,<br />

Hrcek, J., Huber, J.T., Janzen, D.H., Miller, S., Quicke, D.L.J., Rodriguez, J., Sharkey,<br />

M.J., Ward, D., Whitfield, J.B., Zaldivar-Riverón, A., & Hebert, P.D.N. -- An<br />

inordinate fondness for parasitoid wasps: DNA barcoding data from a global array <strong>of</strong><br />

projects<br />

14:45 Chesters, D., Vogler, A.P., Smith, M.A., Janzen, D., Hallwachs, W., Fernández<br />

Triana, J., Laurenne, N.M., Zaldivar-Riverón, A., Shaw, M.R., Broad, G.R.,<br />

Klopfstein, S., Shaw, S.R., Hrcek, J., Hebert, P.D.N., Miller, S., Rodriguez, J.,<br />

Whitfield. J., Sharkey, M.J., Sharanowski, B., Gauld, I.D. & Donald L.J. Quicke --<br />

Beyond the barcode to the tree: Ichneumonoid phylogeny and the importance <strong>of</strong> taxon<br />

sampling density and strategy<br />

15:00 - 15:30 C<strong>of</strong>fee and Tea break<br />

Symposium III. Biological Control and Economic Entomology<br />

15:30 - 17:30 Chair: Andrew D. Austin<br />

15:30 Muirhead, K.A., Andrew D. Austin, Sallam, N. & Donnellan, S.C. -- Biosystematics<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Cotesia flavipes species complex (Hymenoptera: Braconidae): Towards the<br />

effective control <strong>of</strong> mothborer pests in Australia<br />

15:45 Robert A. Wharton, Condon, M., Scheffer, S. & Lewis, M. -- Species diversity <strong>of</strong><br />

neotropical tephritid fruit flies and their braconid parasitoids<br />

16:00 Scheffer, S., Wharton, R.A., Norrbom, A. & Matthew L. Buffington – Proposed<br />

world wide molecular survey <strong>of</strong> tephritid-parasitoid associations using fly puparia: a<br />

new approach to understanding host associations, systematics, and ecology in complex<br />

tritrophic communities<br />

16:15 John T. Huber & Fernández-Triana, J.L. -- Parasitoids <strong>of</strong> Choristoneura spp. (Lep.:<br />

Tortricidae) in the Nearctic region<br />

16:30 Stephan M. Blank, Hara, H., Mikulás, J., Csóka, G., Ciornei, C., Constantineanu, R.,<br />

Irinel Constantineanu, I., Roller, L., Altenh<strong>of</strong>er, E., Huflejt, T. & Vétek, G. – East<br />

Asian pest <strong>of</strong> elms (Ulmus spp.) now invading Europe: the zigzag sawfly, Aproceros<br />

leucopoda (Hymenoptera, Argidae)<br />

16:45 Erhan Koçak -- Entomophagous complex associated with the insects on Heracleum<br />

platytaenium (Apiaceae) in Turkey, with new records<br />

17:00 Hosseinali Lotfalizadeh, Delvare, G. & Rasplus, J.-Y. -- The almond seed wasp,<br />

Eurytoma amygdali Enderlein (Hymenoptera: Eurytomidae) <strong>of</strong> Iran, morphological<br />

and molecular aspects<br />

17:15 M. Reza Mehrnejad -- Impact <strong>of</strong> secondary-parasitoids on population density <strong>of</strong><br />

Psyllaephagus pistaciae in pistachio plantations <strong>of</strong> Iran<br />

19:30 Welcome Reception<br />

4


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Tuesday 22 June 2010<br />

Symposium IV. Cynipoids and gall communities<br />

8:30 - 10:15 Chair: George Melika<br />

08:30 Matthew L. Buffington & Seán G. Brady -- Divergence estimates and new insights<br />

into the early evolution <strong>of</strong> cynipoid wasps (Hymenoptera)<br />

08:45 Mattias Forshage -- "The Kieffer syndrome" - endogenous taxonomic impediments<br />

in poorly known groups, as examplified by the taxonomic history <strong>of</strong> Eucoilinae<br />

(Cynipoidea: Figitidae)<br />

09:00 Johan Liljeblad, Nieves-Aldrey, J.L., Melika, G. & Neser, S. -- A remarkable new<br />

species <strong>of</strong> gallwasp (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae) from South Africa, placed in a new<br />

tribe<br />

09:15 Katherine N. Schick, Potter, D. & Shorthouse, J.D. -- A preliminary study <strong>of</strong><br />

molecular relationships within Diplolepis polita (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae)<br />

09:30 Giovanni Bosio, Quacchia, A., Piazza, E., Ferracini, C., Brussino, G., Melika,<br />

G. & Alma, A. -- Dryocosmus kuriphilus Yasumatsu in Europe: current distribution,<br />

associated parasitoids and biological control (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae)<br />

09:45 Chang-Ti Tang, Yang, M.-M., Melika, G. Nicholls, J.A. & Stone, G.N. -- Gallwasp<br />

diversity <strong>of</strong> Taiwan: testing the Asian Origin hypothesis for the Cynipini<br />

(Hymenoptera, Cynipidae)<br />

10:00 James A. Nicholls, Tang, C.-T., Yang, M.-M., Abe, Y., DeMartini, J.D., Melika, G. &<br />

Stone, G.N. -- Global patterns <strong>of</strong> host-plant association and phylogeography in the oak<br />

gallwasps<br />

10:15 - 10:45 C<strong>of</strong>fee and Tea Break<br />

10:45 - 12:15 Chair: Graham N. Stone<br />

10:45 Karsten Schönrogge -- An introduction to gall formation<br />

11:00 Jack Hearn, Stone, G.N., Blaxter, M., Shorthouse, J. & The GenePool --<br />

Investigating the genetic control <strong>of</strong> gall induction in Cynipid gallwasps<br />

11:15 Frazer Sinclair, Schönrogge, K., Stone, G.N. & Cavers, S. -- Oak Provenances on<br />

Trial: the distribution <strong>of</strong> gall forming wasps at an experimental oak plantation in<br />

Northwest France<br />

11:30 Juli Pujade-Villar, Rodriguez, C., Stone, G.N., Melika, G., Penzés, Z., Ben Jamâa,<br />

M. L., Ouakid, M., Adjami, Y., Bouhraoua, R., Boukreris, F. & Arnedo, M.A. --<br />

Evolutionary history and phylogeography <strong>of</strong> western Mediterranean Synophrus<br />

inquiline gallwasps (Hym., Cynipidae: Synergini)<br />

11:45 Jose Luis Nieves-Aldrey & Medianero, E. -- Taxonomy and phylogeny <strong>of</strong><br />

inquiline oak gallwasps <strong>of</strong> Panama, with description <strong>of</strong> eight new species <strong>of</strong><br />

Synergus (Hymenoptera, Cynipidae, Synergini)<br />

12:00 Graham N. Stone, Melika, G., Ács, Z., Challis, R., Bihari, P., Blaxter, M., Hayward,<br />

A., Csóka, G., Pénzes, Z., Pujade-Villar, J., Nieves-Aldrey, J.L. & Schönrogge K. --<br />

Phylogeny and DNA barcoding <strong>of</strong> inquiline oak gallwasps (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae)<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Western Palaearctic<br />

12:15 - 13:30 Lunch<br />

5


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Symposium V. Taxonomy and Systematics<br />

13:30 - 14:45 Chair: Gavin R. Broad<br />

13:30 Gavin R. Broad & Wharton, R.A. -- Phylogeny and re-classification <strong>of</strong> the genera <strong>of</strong><br />

the ctenopelmatine tribe, Perilissini (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae)<br />

13:45 Mehmet Faruk Gürbüz & Özdan, A. -- Hotspots <strong>of</strong> Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera)<br />

Fauna in Natural Protection Areas <strong>of</strong> East Mediteranean Region in Turkey<br />

14: 00 Marla D. Schwarzfeld & Sperling, F.A.H. -- Ophion (Ichneumonidae) <strong>of</strong> western<br />

Canada: molecules, morphology and species delimitation in a taxonomically<br />

challenging genus<br />

14:15 Alejandro Zaldívar-Riverón, De Jesús-Bonilla, V.S.; Rodríguez-Pérez, A.C.,<br />

Ceccarelli, F.S., Reséndiz-Flores, A. & Smith, M.A. -- DNA barcoding the parasitic<br />

wasp subfamily Doryctinae (Braconidae) from the Chamela-Cuixmala Biosphere<br />

Reserve, Mexico<br />

14:30 Anu Veijalainen, Erwin, T.L., Sääksjärvi, I.E., Wahlberg, N., Broad, G., Gómez, I. &<br />

Longino, J.T. -- Presenting an on-going PhD project: Aspects to consider when<br />

estimating the diversity <strong>of</strong> Neotropical Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera)<br />

14:45 - 15:15 C<strong>of</strong>fee and Tea Break<br />

15:15 - 16:15 Chair: Jose L. Fernández-Triana<br />

15:15 Jose L. Fernández-Triana & Whitfield, J.B. -- Challenges, opportunities and future<br />

strategies in the study <strong>of</strong> Microgastrinae (Braconidae)<br />

15:30 Julia Stigenberg -- Phylogeny and systematics <strong>of</strong> the tribe Meteorini (Braconidae)<br />

15:45 Neveen S. Gadallah, Ahmad, R.S., El-Heneidy, A. & Mahmoud, S.M. --<br />

Ichneumonidae collected from the Suez Canal and North Sinai regions, Egypt (Hym.:<br />

Ichneumonoidea)<br />

16:00 Inanc Özgen & Beyaraslan, A. -- Contributions to the Braconidae (Hymenoptera)<br />

Fauna <strong>of</strong> Turkey<br />

16:15 Péter Bihari, Sipos, B., Melika, G., Somogyi, K., Stone, G.N. & Pénzes, Z. --<br />

Western Palaearctic phylogeography <strong>of</strong> an inquiline gallwasp: Synergus umbraculus<br />

Olivier 1791 (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae, Synergini)<br />

Wednesday 23 June 2010<br />

Symposium VI. Biology, Behavior, Relationships with Hosts or Prey<br />

8:30 – 10:00 Chair: James B. Woolley<br />

08:30 Richard R. Askew, Ribes Escolá, A. & Rizzo, M.C. -- Chalcidoidea associated with<br />

seed capsules <strong>of</strong> Asphodelus<br />

08:45 Alex V. Gumovsky -- Evolution <strong>of</strong> solitary and gregarious development in<br />

parasitoids: what we can learn from Entedon wasps (Chalcidoidea: Eulophidae)<br />

09:00 James B. Woolley, Hopper, K.R. & Heraty, J.M. -- Evolution <strong>of</strong> host use in cryptic<br />

species <strong>of</strong> aphid parasitoids<br />

09:15 Pablo Fuentes-Utrilla, Nicholls, J.A., Bihari, P., Ernst, J., Marsan, C. & Stone,<br />

G.N. -- When morphology is not enough: are generalist chalcid parasitoids aggregates<br />

<strong>of</strong> cryptic sibling species?<br />

09:30 Yoshimi Hirose -- Evolution <strong>of</strong> egg parasitism under water in parasitoid Hymenoptera<br />

6


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

09:45 Rikio Matsumoto -- Host manipulation by spider parasitoids <strong>of</strong> the Polysphincta<br />

group (Pimplinae, Ichneumonidae)<br />

10:00 - 10:30 C<strong>of</strong>fee and Tea Break<br />

10:30 - 12:00 Chair: Serguei Triapitsyn<br />

10:30 Serguei Triapitsyn -- Egg parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae, Mymaridae, and<br />

Trichogrammatidae) <strong>of</strong> Proconiini leafhoppers (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Cicadellinae)<br />

in the New World and Oceania: recent discoveries and a glimpse into future research<br />

10:45 Münevver Kodan & Gürkan, M.O. -- Biology <strong>of</strong> egg parasitoids Trissolcus<br />

semistriatus Nees and Trissolcus grandis Thomson (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) on<br />

Graphosoma lineatum L. (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) in laboratory conditions<br />

11:00 Simon van Noort, Masner, L., Popovici, O.A., Taekul, C., Johnson, N.F. & Austin,<br />

A.D. -- The maritime parasitoid wasp Echthrodesis lamorali Masner (Hymenoptera,<br />

Platygastridae, Scelioninae)<br />

11:15 Mark R. Shaw -- Biology <strong>of</strong> some parasitoids <strong>of</strong> Apoda limacodes (Lepidoptera:<br />

Limacodidae) in Europe<br />

11:30 Keizo Takasuka & Matsumoto, R. -- Oviposition behaviour and infanticide by<br />

Zatypota albicoxa (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae), an ectoparasitoid <strong>of</strong> a theridiid<br />

house spider<br />

11:45 Vladimir E. Gokhman -- Recent advances in the chromosomal studies <strong>of</strong> the<br />

superfamilies Cynipoidea and Chalcidoidea<br />

12:00 – 13:30 Lunch<br />

Symposium VII. Taxonomy and Systematics<br />

13:30 - 14:45 Chair: Barbara J. Sharanowski<br />

13:30 Barbara J. Sharanowski & Deans, A.R. -- A salute to the ensign wasps: molecular<br />

phylogenetics <strong>of</strong> Evaniidae<br />

13:45 Patricia L. Mullins, Sharanowski, B.J., Mikó, I. & Deans, A.R. -- Molecular and<br />

morphological revision <strong>of</strong> Evania (Hymenoptera: Evaniidae) <strong>of</strong> Costa Rica<br />

14:00 Norman F. Johnson & Musetti, L. -- Progress in taxonomy and systematics <strong>of</strong><br />

Platygastroidea: new taxa, tools, and troubles<br />

14:15 Charuwat Taekul, Johnson, N.F. & Valerio, A.A. -- Molecular evolution <strong>of</strong> the<br />

subfamily Telenominae (Hymenoptera: Platygastridae)<br />

14:30 Elijah J. Talamas, Masner, L. & Johnson, N.F. -- Phylogeny and taxonomic status <strong>of</strong><br />

the Paridris (Platygastridae) complex<br />

14:45 - 15:15 C<strong>of</strong>fee and Tea Break<br />

15:15 - 16:00 Chair: Kees van Achterberg<br />

15:15 Kees van Achterberg & Saure, C. -- Revision <strong>of</strong> the Western Palaearctic<br />

Gasteruptiidae (Hymenoptera)<br />

15:30 Andrew Ernst, Mikó, I., Sharanowski, B.J. & Deans, A.R. -- Revision <strong>of</strong> the<br />

subfamily Megaspilinae (Hymenoptera: Ceraphronoidea)<br />

15:45 Gary A.P. Gibson -- Calosota Curtis (Chalcidoidea: Eupelmidae) — pulling the<br />

proverbial thread <strong>of</strong> knowledge<br />

16:00 - 18:00 Poster Session<br />

7


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Thursday 24 June 2010 All day excursion – Fert-Hanság National Park<br />

08:00 Assembly – Sandwich bag lunch for everyone will be served by the hotel<br />

08:30 Departure<br />

18:30 Grill Party (BBQ) in the Kszeg mountains<br />

Friday 25 June 2010<br />

Symposium VIII. Biogeography and Systematics<br />

8:30 - 10:00 Chair: Simon van Noort<br />

08:30 Simon van Noort, Eardley, C. & Robertson, H. -- Hymenoptera <strong>of</strong> the Afrotropical<br />

region: diversity assessment and identification guide proposal<br />

08:45 Denis J. Brothers & Lelej, A.S. -- Re-evaluation <strong>of</strong> phylogeny and higher<br />

classification <strong>of</strong> Mutillidae (Hymenoptera)<br />

09:00 Arkady S. Lelej -- Biogeography <strong>of</strong> the mutillid wasps (Hymenoptera, Mutillidae) in<br />

the Palaearctic region<br />

09:15 Konrad Lohse, Sharanowski, B.J. & Stone, G.N. -- Quantifying the Pleistocene<br />

history <strong>of</strong> the oak gall parasitoid Cecidostiba fungosa using twenty intron loci<br />

09:30 Astrid Cruaud, Jabbour-Zahab, R., Genson, G., Couloux, A., Yan-Qiong Peng, Da<br />

Rong, Y., Ubaidillah, R., Santinelo Pereira, R. A., Kjellberg, F., van Noort, S.,<br />

Kerdelhué, C. & Rasplus, J.-Y. -- Phylogeny and historical biogeography <strong>of</strong><br />

Sycophagine non-pollinating fig wasps (Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea)<br />

09:45 Serguei V. Triapitsyn -- Remediation and curation <strong>of</strong> the University <strong>of</strong> California,<br />

Riverside collections <strong>of</strong> Aphelinidae and Encyrtidae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) on<br />

slides: problems and solutions<br />

10:00 - 10:30 C<strong>of</strong>fee and Tea Break<br />

10:30 - 12:00 Chair: Stefan Schmidt<br />

10:30 Stefan Schmidt & Walter, G.H. -- Breaking the bonds <strong>of</strong> Gondwana – adaptive<br />

radiation <strong>of</strong> the Gondwanan pergid sawflies (Hymenoptera, Symphyta, Pergidae)<br />

10:45 Lars Krogmann & Austin, A.D. -- Australian spider wasp systematics (Hymenoptera:<br />

Pompilidae) – Clearing up more than 200 years <strong>of</strong> confusion and misclassification<br />

11:00 Stefanie Krause & Ohl, M. – Basics First – The Phylogeny <strong>of</strong> the Brood Parasitic<br />

Nyssonini (Hymenoptera: Apoidea)<br />

11:15 Volker Lohrmann & Ohl, M. -- Taxonomy, systematics and biogeography <strong>of</strong><br />

Rhopalosomatidae with special reference to macropterous forms (Hymenoptera:<br />

Vespoidea)<br />

11:30 Villu Soon -- What do we know about Chrysis ignita (Hymenoptera: Chrysididae)?<br />

11:45 Takuma Yoshida, Romel, Q., Muller, F., Perrard, A. & Villemant, C. -- The Yellow-<br />

Legged Hornet Vespa velutina (Hymenoptera: Vespidae): a new invader in France<br />

12:00 - 13:30 Lunch<br />

13:30 - 14:45 Chair: Justin O. Schmidt<br />

13:30 Yasemin Güler, Aytekin, A.M. & Dikmen, F. -- Wild Bee Diversity <strong>of</strong> Sweet Cherry<br />

Orchards in Sultandaı Reservoir (Turkey)<br />

13:45 Nil Bariaçik & Büyükakka, S. -- Nest materials and some physical characteristics <strong>of</strong><br />

the nest <strong>of</strong> Vespa orientalis Linneaus, 1771 (Hymenoptera: Vespinae) in Turkey<br />

8


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

14:00 Sándor Cssz & Majoros Gábor -- Ontogenetic origin <strong>of</strong> mermithogenic Myrmica<br />

phenotypes (Hymenoptera, Formicidae)<br />

14:15 Justin O. Schmidt -- Defense in honeybees: can bees determine how much is at risk?<br />

14:30 Kurt M. Pickett & Carpenter, J.M. -- The poverty <strong>of</strong> partitioned analyses and<br />

character-type chauvinism<br />

14:45 - 15:15 C<strong>of</strong>fee and Tea Break<br />

Symposium IX. Higher-level phylogeny <strong>of</strong> Hymenoptera<br />

15:15 - 16:45 Chair: Michael J. Sharkey<br />

15:15 Ralph S. Peters, Meyer, B., Krogmann, L., Borner, J., Niehuis, O., Schütte, K. &<br />

Mis<strong>of</strong>, B. -- Daring the impossible - a phylogenomic 2000 species approach to<br />

Hymenoptera phylogeny<br />

15:30 James M. Carpenter, Agosti, D., Azevedo, C.O., Brabant, C.M., Brothers, D.J.,<br />

Dubois, J., Kimsey, L.S., Lohrmann, V., Ohl, M., Packer, L. & Schulmeister, S. --<br />

Phylogeny <strong>of</strong> the Aculeata: Results <strong>of</strong> the Hymatol Taxonomic Working Group<br />

15:45 Heraty J.M., Burks, R., Munro, J., Liljeblad, J., Yoder, M. & Elizabeth Murray --<br />

Relationships <strong>of</strong> Chalcidoidea: a Molecular and Morphological Approach<br />

16:00 Michael J. Sharkey, Carpenter, J.M., Vilhelmsen, L., Heraty, J.M., Ronquist, F.,<br />

Deans, A.R., Dowling, A.P.G., Hawks, D., Schulmeister, S. & Wheeler, W.C. --<br />

Morphology and molecules, the first comprehensive, total evidence, phylogenetic<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> the Hymenoptera<br />

16:45 - 17:00 Short Break<br />

17:00 ISH Business Meeting<br />

19:00 <strong>Congress</strong> Dinner<br />

Saturday 26 June 2010 -- Departure and Collecting day 1 – vicinity <strong>of</strong> Kszeg<br />

Sunday 27 June 2010 -- Collecting day 2 – near Balaton Lake. Lunch in the forest<br />

Monday 28 June 2010 -- Collecting day 3 – rség, south <strong>of</strong> Hungary. Lunch in the forest<br />

Tuesday 29 June 2010 -- Departure<br />

9


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

List <strong>of</strong> Posters<br />

(presenter in bold)<br />

Alizadeh Esmaeil & S.E.Sadeghi -- Population dynamics <strong>of</strong> alfalfa weevil parasitoids in West<br />

Azarbaijan (Iran)<br />

Barkan Nezahat Pınar & A.M. Aytekin -- Comparing wing shapes <strong>of</strong> the subspecies Bombus<br />

(Thoracobombus) sylvarum citrin<strong>of</strong>asciatus and Bombus (Thoracobombus) sylvarum<br />

daghestanicus (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Bombus Latreille) using landmark based geometric<br />

morphometrics<br />

Bertone Matthew A., I. Mikó, M.J. Yoder, K. Seltmann & A.R. Deans -- Aligning insect anatomy<br />

ontologies: identifying congruence between Hymenoptera and Diptera<br />

Boyadzhiev Peter S., A.D. Donev & T.S. Gechev -- A new mechanical modification <strong>of</strong> an insect<br />

manipulator<br />

Breitkreuz Laura & M. Ohl -- Bizzare Wasps on the Island New Caledonia – A Revision <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Genus Arpactophilus (Hymenoptera: Apoidea)<br />

Budrien Anna, Ž. Nevronyt & E. Budrys -- Body weight change during the development <strong>of</strong> solitary<br />

wasp Symmorphus allobrogus (Hymenoptera: Vespidae: Eumeninae)<br />

Budrys Eduardas, A. Budrien & Ž. Nevronyt -- Dependence <strong>of</strong> brood cell length on nesting cavity<br />

width in xylicolous solitary wasps <strong>of</strong> genera Ancistrocerus and Symmorphus (Hymenoptera:<br />

Vespidae: Eumeninae)<br />

Budrys Eduardas & A. Budrien -- Assessment <strong>of</strong> anthropogenic impact at landscape scale using trapnesting<br />

wasp and bee community in Europe<br />

Dias Filho Manoel Martins, M. Geraldo, A.M. Penteado-Dias & A.F. Herrera Flórez -- Hymenoptera<br />

parasitoids <strong>of</strong> immature stages <strong>of</strong> Geometridae (Lepidoptera), associated with plants <strong>of</strong> a subnative<br />

forest in the state <strong>of</strong> São Paulo, Brazil<br />

Early John W., L. Masner & D.F. Ward -- Parasitic wasps <strong>of</strong> the Proctotrupoidea, Platygastroidea and<br />

Ceraphronoidea in New Zealand: review and analysis<br />

Falco-Gari Jose Vicente, M.T. Oltra-Moscardo, F.J. Peris-Felipo & R. Jimenez-Peydro -- Exotic fig<br />

pollinators and associates (Chalcidoidea: Agaonidae) <strong>of</strong> Ficus trees in Europe<br />

Falco-Gari Jose Vicente, M.T. Oltra-Moscardo, F.J. Peris-Felipo & R. Jimenez-Peydro -- Diversity <strong>of</strong><br />

Heloridae (Proctotrupoidea) in a protected natural area in Spain<br />

Fusu Lucian -- Tracing the geographical origin <strong>of</strong> Eupelmus vesicularis and a molecular taxonomic<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> the Eupelmus vesicularis species-complex<br />

Fursov Viktor N. -- The importance <strong>of</strong> morphological characters in the taxonomy <strong>of</strong> egg-parasitoids<br />

<strong>of</strong> the family Trichogrammatidae (Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea)<br />

Fursov Viktor N. -- Life-cycle <strong>of</strong> a fig wasp Blastophaga psenes L. (Hymenoptera, Agaonidae) as<br />

obligate pollinator and gall-former in Ficus carica L. (Magnoliopsida) in Crimea, Ukraine<br />

Gess Sarah K. & Gess Friedrich W. -- Flower visiting by sand wasps in southern Africa<br />

Gokhman Vladimir E. -- Chromosomes <strong>of</strong> Xyela julii (Xyelidae) and karyotype evolution in the order<br />

Hymenoptera<br />

Gómez J.F., R.R. Askew & Jose Luis Nieves-Aldrey -- Foodweb structure and diversity <strong>of</strong> parasitoid<br />

communities (Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea) <strong>of</strong> herb gallwasps (Hym., Cynipidae) inducing<br />

galls on Lamiaceae<br />

10


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Gómez J.F., R.R. Askew & Jose Luis Nieves-Aldrey -- Larval morphology <strong>of</strong> Pteromalidae (Hym.,<br />

Chalcidoidea) parasitoids <strong>of</strong> gallwasps (Hymenoptera, Cynipidae) in Europe<br />

Gratiashvili Nana, B. Seifert & S. Barjadze -- Diversity and distribution <strong>of</strong> the Formica species in<br />

Georgia (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)<br />

Guz N., Erhan Kocak, A.E. Akpinar, M.O. Gürkan & A.N. Kilincer -- First record <strong>of</strong> Wolbachia in<br />

Trissolcus species (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae)<br />

Haghighian, F. & Seyed Ebrahim Sadeghi -- Some biological aspects <strong>of</strong> a seed pest wasp,<br />

Bruchophagus astragali (Hym.: Eurytomidae), in rangelands <strong>of</strong> Chaharmahal & Bakhtiary<br />

province <strong>of</strong> Iran<br />

Hilszczaski Jacek -- New data on the occurrence <strong>of</strong> stephanids (Hymenoptera, Stephanidae) in<br />

Turkey and Greece<br />

Holy Kamil -- Research <strong>of</strong> the family Ichneumonidae in the Czech Republic<br />

Hu Hongying -- The resources <strong>of</strong> Trichogrammatidae and Mymaridae and their utilization in<br />

biological control in Xinjiang, China<br />

Izquierdo Moya Isabel, J.M. Cano & C.M. Albadalejo -- EOS, Revista ibérica de Entomología, soon<br />

available online<br />

Izquierdo Moya Isabel -- Contribution <strong>of</strong> EOS, Revista Española de Entomología, (1925-1994) to the<br />

knowledge <strong>of</strong> the Hymenoptera<br />

Janšta Petr -- Updates to the evolution <strong>of</strong> torymids (Hymenoptera: Torymidae)<br />

Japoshvili George -- Morphometrics and host information for the support <strong>of</strong> phylogenetic relations in<br />

genera Microterys Thomson and Aschitus Mercet (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae)<br />

Jiao Tian-Yang & Hui Xiao -- Preliminary Investigation <strong>of</strong> Chalcidoidea in Hainan Island, China<br />

Karlsson Dave -- The Swedish Malaise Trap Project. One step further!<br />

Kirpik Mehmet Ali -- Field observations on the defense and hunting behaviour <strong>of</strong> Pompilidae<br />

(Hymenoptera: Insecta) species<br />

Kirschey Lukas & M. Ohl -- A review <strong>of</strong> the wasp genus Lyroda from Thailand (Hymenoptera:<br />

Apoidea)<br />

Klopfstein Seraina, D. Quicke & C. Kropf -- The evolution <strong>of</strong> antennal courtship in parasitoid wasps<br />

<strong>of</strong> the subfamily Diplazontinae (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae)<br />

Kolesova Natalia S. -- Trophical links <strong>of</strong> Bumblebees (Hymenoptera: Apidae, Bombus) in Vologda<br />

Region <strong>of</strong> Russia<br />

Konishi Kazuhiko -- Taxonomy <strong>of</strong> the genus Eurypterna with biological notes on E. cremieri<br />

(Ichneumonidae, Hybrizontinae)<br />

Kos Katarina, Ž. Tomanovi, A. Petrovi, J. Jakše & S. Trdan -- The separation <strong>of</strong> cereal aphid<br />

parasitoids, Aphidius rhopalosiphi, A. uzbekistanicus and A. avenaphis (Hymenoptera:<br />

Aphidiinae), using mt-DNA (COI) sequences<br />

Krogmann Lars & R.A. Burks -- Rare giants – A review <strong>of</strong> Lept<strong>of</strong>oeninae (Chalcidoidea:<br />

Pteromalidae) and discovery <strong>of</strong> the first Doddifoenus from Indomalaya<br />

L<strong>of</strong>fredo Ana Paula da Silva, A.M. Penteado-Dias, J.F. Sobczak & M. de Oliveira Gonzaga --<br />

Contributions to knowledge <strong>of</strong> Pimplinae wasps (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae) from Brazil<br />

Lohrmann Volker, L. Kirschey, S. Krause, M. Schulze & M. Ohl -- TIGER wasps – a preliminary<br />

review <strong>of</strong> the apoid wasp diversity in Thailand<br />

11


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Lotfalizadeh Hosseinali & M.-H. Kazemi -- Hymenopterous parasitoids <strong>of</strong> safflower fruit flies<br />

(Diptera: Tephritidae) in Iran<br />

Masnady-Yazdinejad Ashkan -- The first braconid species record <strong>of</strong> subfamily Charmontinae from<br />

Iran: Charmon extensor (L.) (Hym., Braconidae, Charmontinae)<br />

Masnady-Yazdinejad Ashkan -- The ichneumonid parasitoids (Hym., Ichneumonidae) <strong>of</strong><br />

Yponomeuta malinellus Zeller (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae) in Iran<br />

Masnady-Yazdinejad Ashkan -- Two newly recorded ichneumonid species as parasitoid wasp <strong>of</strong><br />

Codling Moth (Cydia pomonella L. (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) from Iran<br />

Matsuo Kazunori, M. Tokuda, K. Kiritani, M. Mishima & J. Yukawa -- Comparison <strong>of</strong> parasitoid<br />

communities between insular and mainland populations <strong>of</strong> Pseudasphondylia neolitseae<br />

(Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) in the Izu district, Japan<br />

Medianero, E. & José Luis Nieves-Aldrey -- Systematics and diversity <strong>of</strong> oak gallwasps<br />

(Hymenoptera: Cynipidae: Cynipini) <strong>of</strong> Panama<br />

Mete Özlem & A. Demirsoy -- A preliminary study on the gallwasp fauna <strong>of</strong> Kemaliye (Turkey), with<br />

a new record for Turkey (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae)<br />

Mitroiu Mircea-Dan -- A second European species <strong>of</strong> Netomocera Bouek (Hymenoptera:<br />

Pteromalidae: Diparinae), with notes on other diparines<br />

Mottern Jason L. & J.M. Heraty -- Calesinae: morphological examination and molecular<br />

phylogenetics <strong>of</strong> an enigmatic chalcidoid taxon<br />

Murray Elizabeth, J.M. Heraty, D. Hawks & A. Carmichael -- Molecular Phylogeny <strong>of</strong> Eucharitidae<br />

Nevronyt, Ž., Eduardas Budrys & A. Budrien -- The effects <strong>of</strong> prey abundance on nesting behavior<br />

<strong>of</strong> solitary wasp Symmorphus allobrogus (Hymenoptera: Vespidae: Eumeninae)<br />

Nguyen, H.T., R.T. Ichiki, S.-I. Takano & S. Nakamura -- Parasitization <strong>of</strong> Tetrastichus brontispae, a<br />

potential biological control agent <strong>of</strong> the coconut hispine beetle Brontispa longissima<br />

Noyes John S. -- An inordinate fondness <strong>of</strong> beetles? Even more fond <strong>of</strong> microhymenoptera!<br />

Österblad Ika & N.R. Fritzén -- Rare in collections, common in the forest – the occurrence <strong>of</strong> the<br />

pimpline spider parasitoid Reclinervellus nielseni in Finland<br />

Özgen nanç & H. Bolu -- The chalcidoid parasitoids <strong>of</strong> Coccoidea in southeastern Anatolia Region <strong>of</strong><br />

Turkey<br />

Paretas-Martínez J., C. Restrepo-Ortiz, M. Buffington & Juli Pujade-Villar -- New systematics <strong>of</strong><br />

Australian Thrasorinae (Hymenoptera: Cynipoidea: Figitidae) with a description <strong>of</strong> two new<br />

genera and a new subfamily<br />

Penteado-Dias Angélica M. -- New records <strong>of</strong> Braconidae (Hymenoptera) genera from Brazil in the<br />

state <strong>of</strong> São Paulo<br />

Penteado-Dias Angélica M. & M.M. Dias Filho -- What is “the news” about the institute <strong>of</strong><br />

studies on parasitoid Hymenoptera from southeastern Brazil – HYMPAR-SUDESTE ?<br />

Peris-Felipo Francisco Javier, J.V. Falcó-Garí, M.T. Oltra-Moscardó & R. Jiménez Peydró --<br />

Diversity <strong>of</strong> Alysiinae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in protected areas from the Comunidad<br />

Valenciana, Spain<br />

Peris-Felipo Francisco Javier, J.V. Falcó-Garí, M.T. Oltra-Moscardó & R. Jiménez Peydró -- Habitat<br />

distribution patterns <strong>of</strong> Alysiinae community (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in a forest reserve in<br />

Spain<br />

12


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Peters Ralph S. & R. Abraham -- Little known facts about a well known hymenopteran: on the field<br />

life history <strong>of</strong> Nasonia vitripennis (Walker, 1836) (Chalcidoidea: Pteromalidae)<br />

Popescu Irinel E. -- Confirmation <strong>of</strong> the species rank <strong>of</strong> Torymus macrurus (Föerster, 1859)<br />

(Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea: Torymidae)<br />

Popovici Ovidiu A. -- The maxillo-labial complex in scelionid wasps (Hymenoptera: Platygastroidea)<br />

Pricop Emilian -- First record <strong>of</strong> Dicopus minutissimus Enock (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) from the<br />

European mainland<br />

Rahemi, S., S.E. Sadeghi, E. Rakhshani, S. Moharramipour, M. Shojai & S. Zeinali -- Parasitoids<br />

wasps reported on willow aphids in Iran<br />

Reshchikov Alexey -- New species <strong>of</strong> the genus Lathrolestes (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae) from<br />

the World<br />

Sadeghi S. Ebrahim, Melika, G., Stone, GN., Assareh, M.A., Askary, H., Tavakoli, M., Yarmand, H.,<br />

Azizkhani, E., Zargaran, M.R., Barimani, H., Dordaii, A.A., Aligholizadeh, D., Salehi, M.,<br />

Mozafari, M., Golestaneh, R., Zeinali, S., Mehrabi, A. -- Oak gallwasp fauna <strong>of</strong> Iran<br />

(Hymenoptera, Cynipidae, Cynipini)<br />

Shayesteh Nouraddin -- Study on the biology and efficiency determination testes <strong>of</strong> Habrobracon<br />

hebetor Say (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) on larvae <strong>of</strong> Plodia interpunctella Hübner<br />

(Lepidoptera: Pyralidae)<br />

Shevtsova Ekaterina & C. Hansson -- Structural colours in Hymenoptera wings<br />

Sparks K.S., Andrew D. Austin, A.N. Andersen, S.O. Shattuck, & S.C. Donnellan -- The ant genus<br />

Monomorium in Australia: morphological plasticity or cryptic diversity?<br />

Szabó Gyula, R. Horváth, E. Zakar, L. Kozák, S. Lengyel -- The effect <strong>of</strong> grassland restoration on bee<br />

communities – a preliminary study in Hortobágy National Park, Hungary<br />

Stojanova Anelia, H.S. Civelek , B. Yörük, S. Sarı & T. Atahan -- Turkish Eurytomidae and<br />

Torymidae (Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea): published data and new records<br />

Talamas Elijah J. -- Montage Ultra: High Resolution Imaging <strong>of</strong> Parasitic Hymenoptera<br />

Tavakoli Majid, G. Melika, S.E. Sadeghi, R.R. Askew, G.N. Stone, H. Barimani, D. Aligholizadeh,<br />

Ali asghar Dordaii, H. Yarmand, M.R. Zargaran & S. Mozafarian -- Parasitoid communities<br />

(Chalcidoidea) <strong>of</strong> oak gallwasps <strong>of</strong> Iran (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae)<br />

Tavakoli Majid, G. Melika, S.E. Sadeghi, R.R. Askew, G.N. Stone, H. Barimani, D. Aligholizadeh,<br />

Ali asghar Dordaii, H. Yarmand, M.R. Zargaran & S. Mozafarian -- Oak cynipid gall<br />

inquilines <strong>of</strong> Iran (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae: Synergini)<br />

Triapitsyn Serguei V. -- Remediation and curation <strong>of</strong> the University <strong>of</strong> California, Riverside<br />

collections <strong>of</strong> Aphelinidae and Encyrtidae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) on slides: problems<br />

and solutions<br />

Turinaviien J., A. Budrien, Eduardas Budrys & R. Radzeviit -- Mitochondrial COI gene<br />

sequence in European Eumeninae wasps (Hymenoptera: Vespidae): intra-specific diversity<br />

and applicability for DNA barcoding<br />

Turrisi Giuseppe F. & D.R. Smith -- Systematic and phylogeny <strong>of</strong> the endemic south-eastern Asiatic<br />

Pristaulacus comptipennis species group (Hymenoptera Evanioidea: Aulacidae)<br />

Vårdal Hege -- The gallwasp venom apparatus<br />

Wachi Nakatada & Y. Abe -- Taxonomic notes on the oak gall wasp Callirhytis hakonensis Ashmead<br />

(Hymenoptera: Cynipidae), with description <strong>of</strong> the sexual generation<br />

13


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Yarmand Hamid, S.E. Sadeghi, V.-R. Moniri -- Seed affecting wasps <strong>of</strong> none-legume forage plants in<br />

Iran<br />

Yousuf Mohammad -- Record on Indian species <strong>of</strong> Trichogramma Westwood, along with two new<br />

species, their host range and application against forest insect pests<br />

Zimmermann Dominique & J. Schmidl -- Hymenopterans on tree barks along climatic and altitudinal<br />

gradients in Ecuador<br />

14


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS<br />

(* = presenter)<br />

Revision <strong>of</strong> the West Palaearctic Gasteruptiidae (Hymenoptera)<br />

Kees van Achterberg 1* & C. Saure 2<br />

1 Department <strong>of</strong> Terrestrial Zoology, Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum, Postbus 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The<br />

Netherlands; achterberg@naturalis.nnm.nl<br />

2 Büro für tierökologische Studien, Am Großen Wannsee 2, 14109 Berlin, Germany;<br />

saure-tieroekologie@t-online.de<br />

The Gasteruptiidae are worldwide distributed but with more species in tropical than in<br />

temperate areas. The family contains six valid genera with about 500 valid species, mostly<br />

belonging to the subfamily Gasteruptiinae. Gasteruptiidae first devour the egg or young larva<br />

<strong>of</strong> the solitary host bee (Apidae s.l.) and develop mainly on the bee food. Solitary wasps<br />

(Vespidae-Eumeninae and Crabronidae) are also reported as hosts, but the reports concern<br />

double nests. The subfamily Gasteruptiinae contains three Neotropical genera and the<br />

cosmopolitan genus Gasteruption Latreille. Gasteruption is still unknown from Polynesia and<br />

Hawaii and it is apparently most diverse in the Australian and Afrotropical regions. The world<br />

species are monographed by Kieffer (1912) and catalogued by Hedicke (1939). Useful are the<br />

following keys to part <strong>of</strong> the European species: Šedivý (1958; Czechoslovakia), Oehlke<br />

(1984; Germany), Madl (1988; Sardinia) and Pagliano & Scaramozzino (2000; Italy). The<br />

distribution and the synonymy <strong>of</strong> European species (excluding Caucasus) are given by Madl<br />

(2004). In the West Palaearctic region we have only the genus Gasteruption Latreille.<br />

According to the FE database (Madl 2004) there are 30 European valid species, but our<br />

revision revealed 18 new synonyms, two species with new status and one extension <strong>of</strong> an<br />

Asian species. It results in a provisional total <strong>of</strong> 28 described valid species <strong>of</strong> Gasteruption in<br />

Europe. Up to now three undescribed species have been found in Europe and in addition<br />

several undescribed species in Asiatic Turkey. A short overview <strong>of</strong> the first results <strong>of</strong> the<br />

revision will be presented.<br />

____________________________________<br />

The future <strong>of</strong> taxonomic communication and publishing<br />

Donat Agosti 1 *, Terry Catapano 2 & Lyubomir Penev 3<br />

1 Plazi, Switzerland/Iran; agosti@amnh.org<br />

2 Plazi, Switzerland/USA; catapano@plazi.org<br />

3 Pens<strong>of</strong>t, Bulgaria; lyubo.penev@gmail.com<br />

Publishing taxonomic work has multiple functions, not least to communicate and share<br />

results, get credit for scientific discovery and document the progress in the knowledge in the<br />

domain. The printed work in respective scientific journals, accessible through a ubiquitous<br />

library system as part <strong>of</strong> our scientific infrastructure has been its cornerstone, supplemented<br />

by an exchange <strong>of</strong> reprints by mail.<br />

The advantage <strong>of</strong> having a printed record dating back to 1758 is today hugely outdated by its<br />

deficiencies compared to what the digital world now has to <strong>of</strong>fer: immediate access,<br />

discoverability, linkage to underlying data and other external resources, data mining over<br />

large amount <strong>of</strong> documents, the use <strong>of</strong> shared vocabularies and archiving. This all moves<br />

these publications and in fact the underlying science much closer to the scientific criteria <strong>of</strong><br />

15


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

reproducibility: essentially every body could have access to all the data, including protocols<br />

and programs to reproduce and challenge a piece <strong>of</strong> research.<br />

In this lecture aspects <strong>of</strong> state <strong>of</strong> the art and future developments concerning taxonomic<br />

publishing will be discussed. A first part will discuss efforts to digitize legacy publications,<br />

enhance it with semantic mark-up and links to external databases such as Zoobank, the<br />

Hymenoptera Name Server, Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology, individual collections through<br />

Life Science Identifiers or equivalent, GenBank, and how it’s access is improved by<br />

applications allowing to harvest specific elements from these publications. An assessment <strong>of</strong><br />

the costs and benefits will lead to the second part, prospective publishing. At center will be<br />

the National Library <strong>of</strong> Medicine Document Tape Definition (NLM DTD) for publishing and<br />

archiving that has been customized for the taxonomic domain (taxpub). Its use in a journal<br />

production workflow will be explained that is being developed in collaboration with Pens<strong>of</strong>t,<br />

the future publisher <strong>of</strong> our Journal <strong>of</strong> Hymenoptera Research. This includes the generation <strong>of</strong><br />

a manuscript to its dissemination as peer reviewed journal article, the linking to external<br />

resources such as Zoobank, image banks, GenBank etc.<br />

Finally this change <strong>of</strong> paradigm from an emphasis <strong>of</strong> print/archive to digital/access, and its<br />

implication for our taxonomic infrastructure, such as access to databases, shared vocabularies<br />

or ontologies, its dissemination and reuse, open access, and not least the social changes that<br />

this might imply, will be explained.<br />

The lecture is based on the experiences from building antbase and its pdf repository for ant<br />

taxonomic publications, Hymenoptera Name Server, the fledgling Zoobank, Plazi, Taxpub<br />

and Taxonx XML schemas, developing <strong>of</strong> Zookeys as a taxpub XML based online journal<br />

and Journal <strong>of</strong> Hymenoptera Research that is under development.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Chalcidoidea associated with seed capsules <strong>of</strong> Asphodelus<br />

Richard R. Askew 1 *, A. Ribes Escolá 2 & Maria C. Rizzo 3<br />

1 5, Beeston Hall Mews, Brook Lane, Beeston, Tarporley, Cheshire CW6 9TZ, U.K.; olynx@btinternet.com<br />

2 c/Lleida 36, 25170 Torres de Segre, Lleida, Spain; tnribes@wanadoo.es<br />

3 SENFIMIZO Department, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, University <strong>of</strong> Palermo, 90128 Palermo, Italy;<br />

macoriz@unipa.it<br />

Seeds <strong>of</strong> Asphodelus (Liliaceae) were known, prior to the present study, to be infested by a<br />

single species <strong>of</strong> Eurytomidae, Eurytoma asphodeli Hedqvist, and by parasitic species in the<br />

tetrastichine genus Puklina. In our research E. asphodeli was the chalcid reared most<br />

commonly from the seeds and at first it was thought to be phytophagous. However, it belongs<br />

to the robusta-group <strong>of</strong> species, the great majority <strong>of</strong> which are entomophagous, and the<br />

structure <strong>of</strong> the occipital surface <strong>of</strong> the head with a strong postgenal carina and complete<br />

postgenal groove, is correlated with larval entomophagy. Probable hosts <strong>of</strong> E. asphodeli are<br />

some undescribed species <strong>of</strong> Eurytomidae, provisionally attributed to Bruchophagus. These<br />

species have an occiput that is characteristic <strong>of</strong> phytophagous Eurytomidae, lacking a<br />

postgenal carina and with an incomplete postgenal groove. E. asphodeli can have at least two<br />

generations a year, adults emerging both in the calendar year <strong>of</strong> seed formation and after<br />

overwintering, but the Bruchophagus species are predominantly univoltine, almost all<br />

individuals emerging in spring after overwintering inside the seeds as fully grown larvae.<br />

The pteromalid Pteromalus tethys Gijswijt and a eupelmid in Eupelmus urozonus Dalman<br />

agg. have also been reared from asphodel seeds, P. tethys as an ectoparasitoid <strong>of</strong> eurytomid<br />

larvae and E. urozonus as a secondary parasitoid <strong>of</strong> P. tethys. A species <strong>of</strong> Puklina, perhaps P.<br />

16


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

depilata Graham, was reared in large numbers as a gregarious parasitoid <strong>of</strong> Eurytomidae in A.<br />

cerasiferus seeds, and other slightly different Puklina but possibly only variants <strong>of</strong> P.<br />

depilata, emerged in smaller numbers from seeds <strong>of</strong> other asphodel species.<br />

Microlepidoptera larvae, probably Tortricidae but not yet identified, are common in asphodel<br />

seed capsules in which they consume the seeds. They are attacked by Ichneumonidae,<br />

Braconidae, Hyssopus nigritulus (Zetterstedt) (Eulophidae), and by P. tethys and E. urozonus<br />

agg. which may also develop on the Eurytomidae.<br />

Species <strong>of</strong> Eurytomidae and Puklina encountered in this study appear to be associated only<br />

with asphodels, and there is evidence that different Asphodelus species support differing<br />

faunas <strong>of</strong> Eurytomidae and Puklina. The Bruchophagus in A. ramosus (aestivus auct.) seeds<br />

in Sicily has six segments in the female antennal funicle, five in the male, whereas in<br />

specimens reared from A. albus in the French and Spanish Pyrénées the clava in both sexes<br />

has more or less ‘captured’ a funicle segment, and wing pilosity is white. The form <strong>of</strong> E.<br />

asphodeli in seeds <strong>of</strong> A. cerasiferus is larger and has more extensively red legs than E.<br />

asphodeli from A. ramosus and A. albus, and the Bruchophagus in A. fistulosus seeds is a<br />

species distinct from that found in other species <strong>of</strong> asphodel.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Nest materials and some physical characteristics <strong>of</strong> the nest <strong>of</strong> Vespa orientalis L., 1771<br />

(Hymenoptera: Vespinae) in Turkey<br />

Nil Bariaçik 1 * & Selva Büyükakka 2<br />

1 University <strong>of</strong> Nide, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Science and Arts, Department <strong>of</strong> Biology, TR-51100 Nide, Turkey;<br />

nilbagriacik@hotmail.com<br />

2 University <strong>of</strong> Nide, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Science and Arts, Department <strong>of</strong> Physic, TR-51100 Nide, Turkey;<br />

selvabuyukakkas@mynet.com<br />

The species <strong>of</strong> Vespinae use pulp gathered from nearby environment to make their nest by<br />

chewing and mixing it with their saliva. In the plant material choice <strong>of</strong> social wasps, there is a<br />

significant variation: worn or fresh wood fiber, plant feathers, short plant scrapings, inorganic<br />

materials, etc. Vespa prefers dead parts <strong>of</strong> live trees and worn woods, and tree bark as their<br />

nest material. In addition to plant fiber, they also add soil and mud to their nests. According to<br />

the characteristics <strong>of</strong> nest location, there might be inorganic materials in Vespa orientalis’s<br />

nests. The selected material, the amount <strong>of</strong> salvia and chewing duration determine the<br />

physical features <strong>of</strong> the nest. In this study, we aim to determine the nest material and its<br />

physical features <strong>of</strong> a nest <strong>of</strong> Vespa orientalis in Nigde/Turkey.<br />

The nest surface was monitored by stereomicroscope and Scanning Electron Microscope. The<br />

thickness <strong>of</strong> plant fibers was measured. An EDX analysis was carried out in order to<br />

determine the presence <strong>of</strong> structural organic and inorganic elements and their amount. The<br />

percentage <strong>of</strong> plant material and salvia in the structure <strong>of</strong> the nest was measured. The water<br />

absorption capacity <strong>of</strong> the nest was calculated and the relationship between the fiber thickness<br />

and the water absorption capacity was statistically analyzed.<br />

Vespa orientalis constructed the nest inside the wall made by soil. At the nest, there was no<br />

envelope. At the comb, there are beige, yellowish and brownish linings. The plant fibers were<br />

observed to be short and thick at the images taken by Stereo Microscope and Scanning<br />

Electron Microscope. There are inorganic materials, especially soil, between the fibers. The<br />

average thickness <strong>of</strong> the fiber is 13,47 m. It is founded in EDX analysis that the<br />

concentration <strong>of</strong> nitrogen is 18,75 % and <strong>of</strong> silicon higher than the other elements. The<br />

percentage <strong>of</strong> the fiber was calculated to be 20%, saliva 80%, and the water absorption<br />

17


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

capacity 91%. Conclusively, no statistically significant relationship was observed between<br />

the nest's water absorption capacity and the thickness <strong>of</strong> fiber.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Surface ultra-sculptural studies on the antenna, mouth parts and external genitalia <strong>of</strong><br />

the Carpenter ant, Camponotus compressus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)<br />

Deepak D. Barsagade<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Zoology, RTM Nagpur University, Nagpur 440033 India; dr_ddbars@rediffmail.com<br />

The antenna in all polymorphic forms <strong>of</strong> carpenter ant, Camponotus compressus (Fabricius)<br />

(Hymenoptera: Formicidae) is <strong>of</strong> a genniculate type. The antenna consists <strong>of</strong> a basal scape<br />

ball, pedicel and various numbers <strong>of</strong> flagellomeres. The SEM study shows the scape ball<br />

covered with three types <strong>of</strong> basiconical sensilla, SB- I, SB- II and SB- III in all castes <strong>of</strong><br />

adults. The scape shaft contains sensilla trichoidea (ST) in all polymorphs.<br />

On the pedicel sensilla trichoidea are commonly distributed in female, male and worker antenna<br />

while sensilla basiconica has been noticed only in the female. In female and workers, flagellum<br />

content ten numbers <strong>of</strong> flagellomeres while eleven flagellomeres in the antenna <strong>of</strong> male. On the<br />

flagellum in female and male, sensilla trichoidea curvata, sensilla trichoidea, sensilla basiconica<br />

and sensilla chaetica while in worker sensilla trichoidea curvata and sensilla trichoidea are found.<br />

The mouth parts are adopted for grasping the prey and feeding. The labrum is the fringe, plate like<br />

consists <strong>of</strong> ST and SB in female and male but only ST in workers. The mandibles are large and<br />

powerful. The dorsal surface <strong>of</strong> mandibles consists <strong>of</strong> sensilla trichoidea, DT-I, DT -II and DT-III<br />

while on the ventral side VT-I, VT-II and ventral basiconica (VB) in female and workers, while<br />

VB absent in male. Each mandibles consists four incisors and three molar teeth in female and<br />

worker while two incisors teeth in male. The ST present on cardo, stipes and palps while papillae<br />

are present on anterior part <strong>of</strong> galea <strong>of</strong> maxillae in male, female and worker. The maxillary palps<br />

covered with ST. Three types <strong>of</strong> ST are present on the mentum and submentum <strong>of</strong> labium. The<br />

glossa is large tongue like structure in the worker, covered with SB-I, SB-II and acanthae. On the<br />

labial palp, ST-I, ST-II and sensilla trichoidea curvata (STC) are found on all segment while,<br />

microtrichia MT- I and MT- II are present on first segment in workers only.<br />

The male genitalia consist <strong>of</strong> a basal plate apically. A pair <strong>of</strong> outer gonocoxites, a pair <strong>of</strong> middle<br />

volsellae and inner penis wall is extended at the long appendicular structure. The gonocoxites<br />

consists <strong>of</strong> basal segments basimere and distal region telomere. The female external genetalia is<br />

greatly reduced in queen and worker ants. The IX terga and sterna covered with trichoid sensilla<br />

differentiated in to DT-I, DT-II on dorsal surface and VT-I, VT-II on ventral surface. The<br />

cuticular wall <strong>of</strong> anus consists <strong>of</strong> variable numbers cuticular setae radiating peripherally with a<br />

retractile sting.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Morphological and molecular analysis <strong>of</strong> Vanhornia leileri Hedqvist (Proctotrupoidea,<br />

Vanhorniidae), a neglected European parasitoid <strong>of</strong> eucnemid beetles<br />

Hannes Baur 1 *, Dieter Doczkal 2 , & Manuel Schweizer 3<br />

1 Department <strong>of</strong> Invertebrates, Natural History Museum, Bernastrasse 15, 3005 Bern, Switzerland;<br />

hannes.baur@nmbe.ch<br />

2 Gaggenau, Germany<br />

3 Department <strong>of</strong> Vertebrates, Natural History Museum, Bernastrasse 15, 3005 Bern, Switzerland<br />

18


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

The small, enigmatic family Vanhorniidae (Proctotrupoidea) comprises only three described<br />

species in two genera, Sinicivanhornia quizhouensis Jun-Hua & Ji-Ming, 1990 from China, V.<br />

eucnemidarum Crawford, 1909 from North America, and V. leileri Hedqvist, 1976 from in<br />

Southern Schweden. While V. eucnemidarum is relatively well studied morphologically and<br />

genetically, S. quizhouensis and V. leileri remained in obscurity because <strong>of</strong> the paucity <strong>of</strong> the<br />

material. Their descriptions were based on very few specimens and no new specimens were<br />

recorded since their description. The holotype female and single paratype male <strong>of</strong> V. leileri<br />

were reared from eucnemid beetles. The rediscovery <strong>of</strong> V. leileri in Central Switzerland<br />

(Trimbach, canton Olten) by the entomologist Georg Artmann in 2002 was thus rather<br />

surprising. Later, another specimen from the Savoy Alps in France (near Geneva) could be<br />

traced among miscellaneous material in the Hymenoptera collection <strong>of</strong> the Natural History<br />

Museum Geneva. Finally, D. Doczkal recently collected several specimens in Germany<br />

(Baden-Wurttemberg) using malaise traps. This new material was studied morphologically<br />

and compared with the holotype female <strong>of</strong> V. leileri as well as specimens <strong>of</strong> E.<br />

eucnemidarum. One specimen was also available for molecular analysis, whereby sequences<br />

<strong>of</strong> 16S, 28S and COI were generated. The morphological analysis revealed numerous further<br />

characters for separation <strong>of</strong> the two Vanhornia species. These characters were extensively<br />

documented with a digital imaging system and concern shape <strong>of</strong> head and body and sculpture<br />

<strong>of</strong> the integument. In the molecular analysis V. leileri is also clearly distinct from V.<br />

eucnemidarum though the two species came out as sister groups. However, their position<br />

remained ambiguous with respect to various genera <strong>of</strong> Proctotrupoidea (taxon sampling<br />

according to Dowton & Austin 2001), depending on the markers used.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Western Palaearctic phylogeography <strong>of</strong> an inquiline gallwasp:<br />

Synergus umbraculus Olivier 1791 (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae, Synergini)<br />

Péter Bihari 1∗ , Botond Sipos 1 , George Melika 2 , Kálmán Somogyi 1 , Graham N. Stone 3 & Zsolt Pénzes 1,4<br />

1 Biological Research Center <strong>of</strong> Hungarian Academy <strong>of</strong> Sciences, Institute <strong>of</strong> Genetics, Szeged, Hungary;<br />

bihari.peter@gmail.com<br />

2 Pest Diagnostic Laboratory, Tanakajd, Hungary; melikageorge@gmail.com<br />

3 Institute <strong>of</strong> Cell, Animal and Population Biology, University <strong>of</strong> Edinburgh, Ashworth Laboratories, The King’s<br />

Buildings, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, United Kingdom; Graham.stone@ed.ac.uk<br />

4 Department <strong>of</strong> Ecology, Szeged University, Szeged, Hungary; penzes@bio.u-szeged.hu<br />

The vast majority <strong>of</strong> gallwasps (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae) induce galls mainly on Quercus<br />

species (Cynipidae), however, around 10-15% <strong>of</strong> known species have lost their ability to<br />

induce galls (Synergini), and they develop as inquilines inside galls <strong>of</strong> other cynipids. In<br />

contrast to the gall inducers, we know little about inquilines, though they are abundant and<br />

supposed to play an important role in the community.<br />

We used DNA sequences to study the diversity <strong>of</strong> Synergus umbraculus, a widespread and<br />

polyphagous inquiline gallwasp in the Western Palearctic. Our aims were to investigate (i)<br />

genetic structure on two spatial scales, and (ii) effect <strong>of</strong> gall hosts on the distribution <strong>of</strong><br />

lineages.<br />

Based on DNA sequences <strong>of</strong> two mitochondrial and one nuclear loci a remarkable degree <strong>of</strong><br />

genetic differentiation was detected. Considering the analogous sequences <strong>of</strong> other Synergus<br />

species, Synergus umbraculus can not be regarded as one uniform species. At least four<br />

cryptic species were found.<br />

Using 239 cytochrome b sequences we identified eight haplogroups within the “typical<br />

19


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

umbraculus clade”, which overlap in distribution. Significant phylogeographic pattern was<br />

revealed in the Western Palearctic and a close connection between the Carpathian basin, Italy<br />

and North-Western Europe. Multiple colonisation events from different sources result in the<br />

high diversity <strong>of</strong> the Central European region where an endemic haplogroup was also found.<br />

These results imply the significance <strong>of</strong> this region in phylogeographic context.<br />

Within the “typical umbraculus clade”, no pattern has been detected in variability related to<br />

the most common gall hosts, which suggests that Synergus umbraculus does not depend on a<br />

particular host association.<br />

____________________________________<br />

East Asian pest <strong>of</strong> elms (Ulmus spp.) now invading Europe: the zigzag sawfly,<br />

Aproceros leucopoda (Hymenoptera, Argidae)<br />

Stephan M. Blank 1 *, Hideho Hara 2 , József Mikulás 3 , György Csóka 4 , Constantin Ciornei 5 , Raoul<br />

Constantineanu 6 , Irinel Constantineanu 6 , Ladislav Roller 7 , Ewald Altenh<strong>of</strong>er 8 , Tomasz Huflejt 9 &<br />

Gábor Vétek 10<br />

1 Senckenberg Deutsches Entomologisches Institut, Eberswalder Str. 90, 15374 Müncheberg, Germany;<br />

sblank@senckenberg.de<br />

2 Forestry Research Institute, Hokkaido Research Organization, Bibai, Hokkaido, Japan 079-0198; harahideho@hro.or.jp<br />

3 Corvinus University <strong>of</strong> Budapest, Research Institute for Viticulture and Enology, Urihegy 5/a, 6000<br />

Kecskemét, Hungary; jozsef@mikulas.net<br />

4 Forest Research Institute, Department <strong>of</strong> Forest Protection, P.O.Box 2, 3232 Mátrafüred, Hungary;<br />

csokagy@erti.hu<br />

5 Forest Research and Management Institute, Stefan Cel Mare Street 28, Bacau, Romania;<br />

ciorneitinel@yahoo.com<br />

6 Biological Research Institute, Lascar Catargi 47, 700107 Iai, Romania; racon38@yahoo.com,<br />

irinaconstantineanu@yahoo.com<br />

7 Slovak Academy <strong>of</strong> Sciences, Institute <strong>of</strong> Zoology, Dúbravská cesta 9, 845 06 Bratislava, Slovakia;<br />

uzaeroll@savba.sk<br />

8 Etzen 39, 3920 Groß Gerungs, Austria; ealtenh<strong>of</strong>er@everymail.net<br />

9 Polish Academy <strong>of</strong> Sciences, Museum and Institute <strong>of</strong> Zoology, Wilcza 64, 00-679 Warszawa, Poland;<br />

thuflejt@miiz.waw.pl<br />

10 Corvinus University <strong>of</strong> Budapest, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Horticulture Science, Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, Villanyi út 29-<br />

43, 1118 Budapest, Hungary; gabor.vetek@uni-corvinus.hu<br />

At least since 2003, an invasive sawfly (Aproceros leucopoda Takeuchi, 1939) originating<br />

from East Asia, has colonized elms in Austria, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and the<br />

Ukraine. In Europe, the larvae can completely defoliate native and non-native elm trees and<br />

may cause at least partial dieback. Field observations indicate that elms are infested<br />

independent <strong>of</strong> their age and site characteristics. Young larvae cause characteristically zigzagshaped<br />

feeding traces on leaves. The life cycle <strong>of</strong> A. leucopoda is described based on material<br />

reared in Hokkaido, Japan. Parthenogenetic reproduction, short life cycle <strong>of</strong> summer<br />

generations and the ability to produce four generations per year result in the production <strong>of</strong><br />

numerous progeny. The evolution <strong>of</strong> a seasonal dimorphism in head morphology, a simple<br />

cocoon that is attached directly to the host plant and a short period spent in cocoon stage<br />

during summer, are putative apomorphies shared by Aproceros Takeuchi, 1939 and<br />

Aprosthema Konow, 1899. These traits reduce developmental costs and contribute to the<br />

proliferation <strong>of</strong> A. leucopoda. No specialized parasitoid is known effectively reducing<br />

outbreaks <strong>of</strong> this species.<br />

The initial occurrence <strong>of</strong> A. leucopoda in Europe cannot be reconstructed. Presumably, it was<br />

introduced passively with elm plants used in horticulture or forestry. Transport <strong>of</strong> cocoons<br />

20


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

with other merchandise is also possible. Passive dispersal along with traded material might be<br />

a major way in which this species rapidly extended its distribution over great distances within<br />

Europe, but active dispersal is also to be expected, since the imagines are strong flyers. It is<br />

likely that this pest will spread into central and south-western Europe. Further monitoring <strong>of</strong><br />

A. leucopoda is required to assess future range extensions in Europe, its exacerbating effect<br />

on Dutch elm disease and to find a suitable biocontrol agent. In a forthcoming publication<br />

(European Journal <strong>of</strong> Entomology, in press), details on identification <strong>of</strong> larvae and imagines,<br />

current distribution in Europe, development and damage caused have been summarized.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Dryocosmus kuriphilus Yasumatsu in Europe: current distribution, associated<br />

parasitoids and biological control (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae)<br />

Giovanni Bosio 1 *, Ambra Quacchia 2 , Enzo Piazza 2 , Chiara Ferracini 2 , Gianfranco Brussino 1 ,<br />

George Melika 3 & Alberto Alma 2<br />

1 Phytosanitary Service, Piedmont Region, Via Livorno 60, 10144 Turin, Italy;*<br />

giovanni.bosio@regione.piemonte.it<br />

2 DIVAPRA Entomology and Zoology applied to the Environment “Carlo Vidano”, Via L. da Vinci 44, 10095<br />

Grugliasco (TO), Italy<br />

3 Pest Diagnostic Laboratory, Plant Protection & Soil Conservation Directorate <strong>of</strong> County Vas, Ambrozy setany<br />

2, 9762 Tanakajd, Hungary; melikageorge@gmail.com<br />

The oriental chestnut gallwasp Dryocosmus kuriphilus Yasumatsu (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae),<br />

native <strong>of</strong> China but now present in Japan, Korea, Nepal and USA, was found for the first time<br />

in Europe in Piedmont, north-western Italy in 2002 The pest was probably introduced in<br />

Europe some years before, through import <strong>of</strong> chestnut scions for genetic improvement <strong>of</strong><br />

chestnut stands in Piedmont. Official surveys carried out in 2002 showed that infestation<br />

already involved hundreds <strong>of</strong> chestnut woods’ hectares, so attempts to eradicate were not<br />

feasible. In the following years, D. kuriphilus began to spread into many Italian regions,<br />

threatening chestnut fruit production. The pest is now reported in other neighbouring<br />

countries: France, Slovenia, Switzerland and Hungary. Chestnut trees are widely spread in<br />

Europe and especially in Italy. The fast diffusion <strong>of</strong> the chestnut gallwasp is probably due to<br />

the trade <strong>of</strong> young infested plants and to the flight <strong>of</strong> females, emerging from the galls during<br />

the summer. The huge development <strong>of</strong> an exotic pest’s population is favoured by the lack <strong>of</strong><br />

its natural enemies in the new environment. Considering the presence <strong>of</strong> many other oak<br />

gallwasps in Italy, a shift <strong>of</strong> parasitoids from numerous species <strong>of</strong> oak cynipid galls to the new<br />

host on chestnut was expected. Since 2002 about 25 chalcidoid parasitoid species have been<br />

reared from D. kuriphilus galls which belong to 6 Chalcidoidea families: Eurytomidae,<br />

Pteromalidae, Torymidae, Eulophidae, Ormyridae, Eupelmidae. Among these species,<br />

Eupelmidae and Torymidae are playing the major role. Many <strong>of</strong> them were already reported<br />

as D. kuriphilus parasitoids from other countries. Parasitoid studies evaluated in different<br />

regions <strong>of</strong> Italy during 2002-2009 showed a low impact <strong>of</strong> this parasitoid complex onto the<br />

population dynamics <strong>of</strong> the chestnut gallwasp, so they can’t probably naturally control the<br />

pest. On the basis <strong>of</strong> this consideration and the lack <strong>of</strong> any other effective techniques<br />

[pesticide treatments produced nearly no positive effect], following the successful Japanese<br />

experience, the torymid ectoparasitoid, Torymus sinensis Kamijo, was introduced into<br />

Piedmont to control the pest. Chestnut galls, potentially parasitized by T. sinensis, were sent<br />

by Dr. S. Moriya (National Agricultural Research Center, Tsukuba, Japan) to the Entomology<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> the Agriculture Faculty <strong>of</strong> University <strong>of</strong> Turin during 2002–2008. The first T.<br />

sinensis releases in open field were made in three localities <strong>of</strong> Cuneo province in 2005.<br />

21


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Surveys in the following years have revealed that the exotic parasitoid is well established in<br />

the new environment and is under active reproduction.<br />

____________________________________<br />

The importance <strong>of</strong> morphology in the age <strong>of</strong> molecular hymenopteran phylogenetics<br />

Seán G. Brady<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, National Museum <strong>of</strong> Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC,<br />

USA; bradys@si.edu<br />

Molecular data are eclipsing morphology as the primary source <strong>of</strong> phylogenetic characters for<br />

many hymenopteran groups. Molecular data also increasingly impact other areas <strong>of</strong><br />

systematics such as species discovery and identification. In general, the study <strong>of</strong> morphology<br />

is becoming increasingly marginalized in the genomics era. I discuss case studies from own<br />

work on ants and bees that illustrate the continued importance <strong>of</strong> morphological data for<br />

molecular phylogenetics. These examples include incorporating fossils into phylogeny,<br />

inferring divergence dates, studying rare taxa, establishing independent sources <strong>of</strong><br />

phylogenetic data, corroborating novel molecular clades, and creating diagnostic<br />

morphological keys based on molecular phylogeny. This is far from an exhaustive list <strong>of</strong> how<br />

morphology can impact molecular phylogenetics. As hymenopteran systematists embrace the<br />

vast potential <strong>of</strong>fered by genetic and genomic data, we also have much to gain in continuing<br />

to forge new advances in morphological systems. The more that we as a community explicitly<br />

demonstrate to our colleagues the positive interplay between morphology and molecules, the<br />

better this perspective can be realized.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Phylogeny and re-classification <strong>of</strong> the genera <strong>of</strong> the ctenopelmatine tribe, Perilissini<br />

(Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae)<br />

Gavin R. Broad 1 * & Robert A. Wharton 2<br />

1 Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, the Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK;<br />

g.broad@nhm.ac.uk<br />

2 Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, 77843, USA;<br />

rawbaw2@neo.tamu.edu<br />

The ichneumonid subfamily Ctenopelmatinae is a heterogeneous assemblage <strong>of</strong> genera that<br />

are endoparasitoids <strong>of</strong> sawfly larvae and are more or less unsatisfactorily classified in up to<br />

nine tribes. Some <strong>of</strong> these tribes are very poorly defined, including the Perilissini. As part <strong>of</strong><br />

a larger, PEET-funded initiative on the phylogeny and classification <strong>of</strong> Ctenopelmatinae, we<br />

have been concentrating on scoring the genera <strong>of</strong> Perilissini for a wide spectrum <strong>of</strong><br />

morphological characters. We aim to (1) provide a re-definition <strong>of</strong> the Perilissini based on<br />

apomorphic characters; (2) re-classify those genera erroneously placed in Perilissini (e.g.<br />

Perilimicron); (3) produce a (hopefully relatively robust) phylogeny <strong>of</strong> the genera <strong>of</strong><br />

Perilissini; (4) define the genera <strong>of</strong> Perilissini; and (5) re-classify the various species groups<br />

<strong>of</strong> the species-rich and vague genera, Lathrolestes and Perilissus. We present preliminary<br />

phylogenetic trees and an exploration <strong>of</strong> various character systems. Some novel characters<br />

are introduced (such as the shape <strong>of</strong> the upper division <strong>of</strong> the metapleurum) that have proved<br />

very useful in defining large groups <strong>of</strong> genera.<br />

____________________________________<br />

22


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Re-evaluation <strong>of</strong> phylogeny and higher classification <strong>of</strong> Mutillidae (Hymenoptera)<br />

Denis J. Brothers 1 * & Arkady S. Lelej 2<br />

1 School <strong>of</strong> Biological and Conservation Sciences, University <strong>of</strong> KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa;<br />

brothers@ukzn.ac.za<br />

2 Institute <strong>of</strong> Biology and Soil Science, Russian Academy <strong>of</strong> Sciences, Far Eastern Branch, Vladivostok, Russia;<br />

lelej@biosoil.ru<br />

Brothers (1975) produced the first phylogenetic analysis and higher classification <strong>of</strong><br />

Mutillidae (velvet ants) on a world-wide basis, using 43 characters and groundplans for the<br />

taxa. Seven subfamilies (Myrmosinae, Pseudophotopsidinae, Ticoplinae, Rhopalomutillinae,<br />

Sphaeropthalminae, Myrmillinae and Mutillinae) and several tribes and subtribes were<br />

proposed. In 1997 Lelej & Nemkov published an analysis (using 89 characters, many different<br />

from those previously used at this level, and similar methods) and proposed ten subfamilies<br />

(Myrmosinae, Kudakrumiinae, Pseudophotopsidinae, Ticoplinae, Rhopalomutillinae,<br />

Ephutinae, Dasylabrinae, Sphaeropthalminae, Myrmillinae and Mutillinae), reflecting several<br />

differences in inferred relationships. Slight expansion and reanalysis by Brothers in 1999,<br />

taking Lelej & Nemkov’s results into account, produced essentially the same results as he had<br />

obtained in 1975, however.<br />

In order to clarify the reasons for the above differences, and in an attempt to derive an<br />

improved classification, Brothers invited Lelej to collaborate on a more extensive analysis.<br />

Methods: More than 50 genera (rather than assumed higher taxa), including varied species for<br />

each where possible, were individually scored for all morphological characters previously<br />

considered in such analyses as well as others used at the genus level, a total <strong>of</strong> about 190<br />

characters. Four outgroup genera representing those families previously found to be most<br />

closely related to Mutillidae were similarly scored. Parsimony analyses were performed, using<br />

various options involving additivity <strong>of</strong> character states and implied weighting <strong>of</strong> characters.<br />

Neither Brothers’s nor Lelej’s previously proposed phylogenies were fully supported. Several<br />

“taxa” were found probably to be paraphyletic. Different analytic assumptions produced<br />

considerable differences in branching patterns.<br />

Recognition <strong>of</strong> a series <strong>of</strong> higher taxa somewhat intermediate between the earlier schemes<br />

proposed by Brothers and Lelej may be justified. However, the inclusion <strong>of</strong> several characters<br />

polymorphic within genera, and the fact that such variation in state expression appears to<br />

differ in extent in different parts <strong>of</strong> the trees found, has undoubtedly confounded the situation;<br />

such factors, and the possibility <strong>of</strong> using species rather than genera as terminals, need further<br />

exploration before firm conclusions can be reached.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Divergence estimates and new insights into the early evolution <strong>of</strong> cynipoid wasps<br />

(Hymenoptera)<br />

Matthew L. Buffington 1 * & Seán G. Brady 2<br />

1 Systematic Entomology Laboratory, ARS-USDA, c/o National Museum <strong>of</strong> Natural History, Smithsonian<br />

Institution, Washington, DC, USA; matt.buffington@ars.usda.gov<br />

2 Smithsonian Institution, PO Box 37012, MRC 188, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA; bradys@si.edu<br />

The Cynipoidea, generally known as the gall wasps, possess a broad range <strong>of</strong> biological<br />

attributes, ranging from primary and hyper parasitization, to gall induction and inquillinism.<br />

We explore the early phylogenetic branching patterns <strong>of</strong> the cynipoids, and in the process,<br />

23


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

estimate non clock-like divergence times for all the major lineages. Recent work on fossil<br />

cynipoids has provided calibration points for our analyses. Our results estimate the median<br />

age <strong>of</strong> the branch leading to the root <strong>of</strong> the Cynipoidea to be 130 million years old, the branch<br />

leading to the true gall wasps (Cynipidae) to be 54 million years old, and the branch leading<br />

to the entomophagous Figitidae to be 105 million years. Given these dates, and the estimated<br />

divergence estimates for the hosts <strong>of</strong> cynipoid wasps (both plants and other insects), we build<br />

on previous hypotheses that the gall wasps are a derived, phytophagous lineage nested within<br />

the largely parasitic Cynipoidea, and that major lineages <strong>of</strong> Figitidae chronologically<br />

‘tracked’ the divergence times <strong>of</strong> their hosts.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Phylogeny <strong>of</strong> the Aculeata: Results <strong>of</strong> the Hymatol Taxonomic Working Group<br />

James M. Carpenter 1 *, Donat Agosti 1 , Celso O. Azevedo 2 , Craig M. Brabant 3 , Denis J. Brothers 4 ,<br />

Jacques Dubois 1 , Lynn S. Kimsey 5 , Volker Lohrmann 6 , Michael Ohl 6 , Laurence Packer 7 & Susanne<br />

Schulmeister 1<br />

1 American Museum <strong>of</strong> Natural History, NYC, USA; carpente@amnh.org<br />

2 Universidade Federal do Espirito Santo, Mexico<br />

3 University <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin-Madison, USA<br />

4 University <strong>of</strong> Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa<br />

5 University <strong>of</strong> California, USA<br />

6 Museum für Naturkunde an der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany<br />

7 York University; UK<br />

The first phylogenetic analysis based on combined morphological and molecular data for all<br />

families <strong>of</strong> Aculeata is presented. The morphological characters are modified from those used<br />

in previous studies by the authors, and are scored for more than 80 species terminals; they<br />

consist <strong>of</strong> more than 200 variables. The molecular data are from four genes (16S, 18S, 28S<br />

and COI), and comprise more than 4000 sites. Cladistic analysis using ichneumonoid<br />

outgroups resolves Chrysidoidea as monophyletic, and the sister-group <strong>of</strong> Apoidea and<br />

Vespoidea. Apoidea is monophyletic, but Vespoidea is not supported. Most families with<br />

multiple representatives are supported as monophyletic.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Beyond the barcode to the tree: Ichneumonoid phylogeny and the importance <strong>of</strong> taxon<br />

sampling density and strategy<br />

Chesters, D. 1,2 , Vogler, A.P. 1,2 , Smith, M.A. 3 , Janzen, D. 4 , Hallwachs, W. 4 , Triana Fernández, J. 3,5 ,<br />

Laurenne, N.M. 6 , Zaldivar-Riverón, A. 7 , Shaw, M.R. 8 , Broad, G.R. 2 , Klopfstein, S. 9 , Shaw, S.R. 10 ,<br />

Hrcek, J. 11 , Hebert, P.D.N. 3 , Miller, S. 12 , Rodriguez, J. 13 , Whitfield. J. 14 , Sharkey, M.J. 15 , Sharanowski,<br />

B.J. 16 , Gauld, I.D. [deceased] 2 & Donald L.J. Quicke 1,2 *<br />

1 Division <strong>of</strong> Biology, Imperial College London, UK; d.quicke@imperial.ac.uk<br />

2 The Natural History Museum; Cromwell Rd.; London SW7 5DB; UK<br />

3 Biodiversity Institute <strong>of</strong> Ontario, University <strong>of</strong> Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 Canada<br />

4 Department <strong>of</strong> Biology, University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA<br />

5 Canadian National Collection <strong>of</strong> Insects 960 Carling Ave., Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0C6, Canada<br />

6 Museum <strong>of</strong> Natural History, Entomology Division, PO Box 17, 00014-University <strong>of</strong> Helsinki, Finland<br />

7 Colección Nacional de Insectos, Departamento de Zoología, Instituto de Biología, UNAM, A.P. 70-153, C.P.<br />

04510, México<br />

8 Honorary Research Associate, National Museums <strong>of</strong> Scotland, Chambers Street, Edinburgh, EH1 1JF, UK<br />

24


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

9 Natural History Museum, Department <strong>of</strong> Invertebrates, Bernastrasse 15, CH-3005 Bern, Switzerland, and<br />

Zoologial Institute, Division <strong>of</strong> Community Ecology, University <strong>of</strong> Bern, Baltzerstrasse 6, CH-3012 Bern,<br />

Switzerland<br />

10 University <strong>of</strong> Wyoming Insect Museum, Department <strong>of</strong> Renewable Resources, University <strong>of</strong> Wyoming,<br />

Laramie, WY, 82071-3354, USA<br />

11 Faculty <strong>of</strong> Science, University <strong>of</strong> South Bohemia, and Institute <strong>of</strong> Entomology, Biology Centre ASCR,<br />

Branisovska 31, 370 05 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic<br />

12 Smithsonian Institution PO Box 37012, MRC 105 Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA<br />

13 National Center for Ecological, Analysis and Synthesis (NCEAS), University <strong>of</strong> California, Santa Barbara,<br />

735 State St., Suite 300 Santa Barbara, CA 93101, USA<br />

14 Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, 320 Morrill Hall, University <strong>of</strong> Illinois, 505 S. Goodwin Ave, Urbana, IL 61801,<br />

USA<br />

15 Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, University <strong>of</strong> Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546-0091, USA<br />

16 North Carolina State University, Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, Campus Box 7613, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.<br />

E-mails: d.chesters06@imperial.ac.uk; apv@nhm.ac.uk; salex@uoguelph.ca; djanzen@sas.upenn.edu;<br />

whallwac@sas.upenn.edu; jftriana@uoguelph.ca; nina.laurenne@helsinki.fi; azaldivar@ibiologia.unam.mx;<br />

markshaw@xenarcha.com; g.broad@nhm.ac.uk; klopfstein@nmbe.ch; Braconid@uwyo.edu;<br />

janhrcek@gmail.com; phebert@uoguelph.ca; millers@si.edu; rodriguez@nceas.ucsb.edu;<br />

jwhitfie@life.uiuc.edu; msharkey@uky.edu; barb.sharanowski@gmail.com<br />

The enormous sequence database <strong>of</strong> cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (CO1) being assembled<br />

from various DNA barcoding projects as well as from independent phylogenetic studies<br />

provides an almost unprecedented amount <strong>of</strong> data for molecular systematics in addition to its<br />

original species delimitation role. Here we explore the phylogenetic trees that can be<br />

reconstructed from the available species-level sequence data in the enormously diverse,<br />

cosmopolitan parasitoid wasp superfamily Ichneumonoidea. Out <strong>of</strong> approximately 78<br />

currently recognised subfamilies and 58,000 described species, data for the barcoding region<br />

<strong>of</strong> CO1 were assembled for over 3500 putative species-level terminals (many undescribed),<br />

representing all but 3 <strong>of</strong> the recognised subfamilies. Phylogenetic trees were reconstructed<br />

from the whole data and from variously rarefied subsets, using both parsimony and rapid<br />

likelihood techniques. The probable phylogenetic accuracy <strong>of</strong> each analysis was assessed<br />

using the taxonomic retention index (tRI) and a new Simpson Diversity Index-based metric<br />

(tSD) <strong>of</strong> the morphologically recognised families, subfamilies and genera on the resulting<br />

trees. We implemented concurrent but independent sampling and scoring <strong>of</strong> the 680 genera<br />

and 74 subfamilies within the Ichneumonoidea with the aim <strong>of</strong> giving accuracy scores in the<br />

context <strong>of</strong> a variable, large scale phylogenetic treespace. We find that a subset <strong>of</strong> taxa show<br />

consistent monophyly, regardless <strong>of</strong> the number or identity <strong>of</strong> sequences used in the<br />

resampled data set. However, for the majority <strong>of</strong> taxonomic groups, maximisation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

measures <strong>of</strong> phylogenetic accuracy is dependent upon the numbers <strong>of</strong> terminals sampled, with<br />

increased sampling <strong>of</strong> a given taxon leading to a reduction in polyphyly and paraphyly both <strong>of</strong><br />

the taxon itself, and the local phylogenetic environment (deeper taxonomic nodes). Further,<br />

we find improvements to accuracy are enhanced when sampling shifts from a single<br />

biogeographic zone to multiple zones. Finally, we find accuracy associating with particular<br />

tree characteristics, especially maximum branch length. The results suggest minimum<br />

parameters for taxonomic and geographic coverage if COI is to be used as a primary means <strong>of</strong><br />

phylogenetic assessment and indicate the relationship between higher taxonomic group<br />

association and the interaction between taxonomic coverage and rates <strong>of</strong> COI evolution.<br />

____________________________________<br />

25


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Phylogeny and historical biogeography <strong>of</strong> Sycophagine non-pollinating fig wasps<br />

(Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea)<br />

Astrid Cruaud 1* , Roula Jabbour-Zahab 1 , Gwenaëlle Genson 1 , Arnaud Couloux 2 , Peng Yan-Qiong 3 ,<br />

Yang Da Rong 3 , Rosichon Ubaidillah 4 , Rodrigo Augusto Santinelo Pereira 5 , Finn Kjellberg 6 , Simon<br />

van Noort 7 , Carole Kerdelhué 8 & Jean-Yves Rasplus 1<br />

1 INRA-UMR Centre de Biologie et de Gestion des Populations, CBGP, (INRA/IRD/CIRAD/Montpellier<br />

SupAgro), Campus international de Baillarguet, CS 30016, 34988 Montferrier-sur Lez, France;<br />

cruaud@supagro.inra.fr<br />

2 Génoscope, Centre National de Séquençage, 2, rue Gaston Crémieux, F-91057 Evry, France<br />

3 Key Laboratory <strong>of</strong> Tropical Forest Ecology, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy <strong>of</strong><br />

Sciences, 88 Xuefu Road, 650223 Kunming, Yunnan, China<br />

4 Entomology Laboratory, Zoology Division (Museum Zoologicum Bogoriense). Center Research for Biology,<br />

LIPI, Gedung Widyasatwaloka Jl. Raya Jakarta-Bogor, Km 46, Cobinong 16911, Bogor, Indonesia<br />

5 Depto de Biologia/FFCLRP-USP, Av. Bandeirantes, 3900, 14040-901 - Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil<br />

6 CNRS - UMR Centre d’Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, CEFE, 1919 route de Mende, 34293 Montpellier<br />

Cedex 5, France<br />

7 Natural History Division, South African Museum, Iziko Museums <strong>of</strong> Cape Town, PO Box 61, Cape Town<br />

8000, South Africa and Department <strong>of</strong> Zoology, University <strong>of</strong> Cape Town, Private Bag, Rondebosch, 7701<br />

South Africa<br />

8 INRA, UMR BioGeCo. 69 Route d’Arcachon F-33612 Cestas Cedex, France<br />

Figs (Ficus, Moraceae) are exploited by rich communities <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>ten host-specific<br />

phytophagous and parasitoid wasps. Among them, non-pollinating Sycophaginae<br />

(Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea) may share a common history with Ficus and their mutualistic<br />

pollinators (Agaonidae). Therefore they could be used as an additional tool to unravel the<br />

biogeographical complexities <strong>of</strong> the fig system. We investigate here, for the first time, the<br />

phylogeny and the biogeographical history <strong>of</strong> Sycophaginae at a world level and compare the<br />

timing <strong>of</strong> radiation and dispersion <strong>of</strong> major clades with available data on Ficus and fig<br />

pollinators. Maximum likelihood and Bayesian analyses were conducted on 4267 bp <strong>of</strong><br />

mitochondrial and nuclear DNA to produce a phylogeny <strong>of</strong> all genera <strong>of</strong> Sycophaginae. Two<br />

relaxed clock methods with or without rate autocorrelation were used for date estimation.<br />

Analyses <strong>of</strong> ancestral area were also conducted to investigate the geographical origin <strong>of</strong><br />

Sycophaginae.<br />

The phylogeny is well resolved and supported. Our data suggest a post-Gondwanian age <strong>of</strong><br />

Sycophaginae (50-40 Ma) and two independent out-<strong>of</strong>-Australia dispersal events to<br />

Continental Asia. Given paleoclimatic and paleogeographic records, the following scenario<br />

appears the most likely. The ancestor <strong>of</strong> Idarnes+Apocryptophagus migrated to Greater India<br />

through the Ninetyeast Ridge (40-30 Ma). The ancestor <strong>of</strong> Anidarnes+Conidarnes dispersed<br />

later via Sundaland (25-20 Ma). Idarnes and Anidarnes subsequently reached the New World<br />

via the North Atlantic Land Bridges during the Late Oligocene Warming Event.<br />

Apocryptophagus reached Africa 20 Ma ago via the Arabic corridors and returned to<br />

Australasia following the expansion <strong>of</strong> Sundaland tropical forests (20-10 Ma). We recorded a<br />

good coincidence <strong>of</strong> timing between dispersal events and continental connections.<br />

Furthermore the timing <strong>of</strong> radiation and dispersion <strong>of</strong> Sycophaginae is concomitant with the<br />

timings estimated for Ficus, pollinators and fig dispersers. Therefore, our study highlights the<br />

power <strong>of</strong> phylogenetic multiple dating <strong>of</strong> interacting groups to reconstruct the historical<br />

biogeography <strong>of</strong> these associations.<br />

Interestingly Sycophaga renders Apocryptophagus paraphyletic. Both Sycophaga and<br />

Apocryptophagus possess similar males with a unique suite <strong>of</strong> synapomorphies: the long<br />

peritremata <strong>of</strong> the abdominal spiracles, the flat scape <strong>of</strong> the antenna and the rectangular head.<br />

26


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Males <strong>of</strong> Platyneura and Sycophaga cannot be separated on tangible morphological<br />

characters. However females <strong>of</strong> Sycophaga are strongly differentiated and exhibit several<br />

morphological adaptations to crawl into the ostiole <strong>of</strong> the figs (flattened and elongated head,<br />

short fore tibiae, spurs on the hind tibia, absence <strong>of</strong> any sculpture on the mesosoma) that make<br />

them easy to identify on morphology. Our results show that for Sycophagine fig wasps 1) the<br />

ability to enter the fig through the ostiole took about 30Ma and 2) in the next 15 Ma the<br />

female wasps evolved several morphologigal adaptations to crawl through the bracts so that<br />

females <strong>of</strong> Sycophaga and Apocryptophagus seem to belong to different genera.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Ontogenetic origin <strong>of</strong> mermithogenic Myrmica phenotypes (Hymenoptera, Formicidae)<br />

Sándor Cssz 1* & Gábor Majoros 2<br />

1 Department <strong>of</strong> Zoology, Hungarian Natural History Museum, Budapest, Hungary; csosz@zoo.zoo.nhmus.hu<br />

2 Department <strong>of</strong> Parasitology and Zoology, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Veterinary Sciences, Szent István University, Budapest,<br />

Hungary; majoros.gabor@aotk.szie.hu<br />

Entomopathogen parasites typically induce alternative "parasitogenic" phenotypes in ants and<br />

other insects. However, the basis <strong>of</strong> generated developmental changes is poorly understood.<br />

Parasitic mermithid nematodes also cause the formation <strong>of</strong> three discrete and aberrant<br />

morphologies within Myrmica ants. These have been called "worker-like" ("mermithergate"),<br />

"intermorphic" ("gynaecoid mermithergate") and "gyne-like" ("mermithogyne") and their<br />

formation has been attributed to infection <strong>of</strong> worker- and queen-presumptive larvae,<br />

respectively. In order to better understand the developmental mechanisms that lead to the<br />

formation <strong>of</strong> these alternative parasitogenic phenotypes we observed allometric patterns <strong>of</strong><br />

parasitogenic Myrmica gallienii phenotypes in comparison with uninfected workers and gynes<br />

from the same nests. It was revealed that the three discrete morphologies <strong>of</strong> parasitogenic<br />

female phenotypes did not differ significantly from each other in their scaling indicating that<br />

these were trapped in the same developmental pathway. Infected individuals scaled according<br />

to basically gyne-like allometry, however significantly differed from workers in their scaling.<br />

Based on the observed scaling patterns we herein raise an alternative explanation according to<br />

which both "mermithergate", "gynaecoid mermithergate" and "mermithogyne" Myrmica<br />

phenotypes develop from the same type <strong>of</strong> larvae, namely from the queen-presumptive larvae<br />

and their formation, therefore, is rendered as a diverging process. According to the<br />

mechanism we propose effect <strong>of</strong> nematodes may turn out to be the determining factor in the<br />

formation <strong>of</strong> alternative parasitogenic morphologies.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Looking inside the head capsule <strong>of</strong> Chalcididae<br />

provides informative characters to infer their phylogeny<br />

Gérard Delvare<br />

Centre de Cooperation <strong>International</strong>e en Recherche Agronomique pour le Developpement, (Cirad TA A 55/L),<br />

UMR CBGP, Campus <strong>International</strong> de Baillarguet, 34398 Montpellier Cedex 5 France; gerard.delvare@cirad.fr<br />

Chalcididae are a well characterized family <strong>of</strong> chalcidoid wasps. Nevertheless, using<br />

molecular data, the family is never retrieved monophyletic. On the other hand, looking to the<br />

back <strong>of</strong> the head provided informative characters for the inference <strong>of</strong> their phylogeny in<br />

Eurytominae. In Chalcididae this region – postocciput, postgena and hypostoma – is quite<br />

variable and the homologies across the different recognized subfamilies or tribes were<br />

difficult to assess. Therefore the examination <strong>of</strong> the internal structures – tentorial arms,<br />

27


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

postoccipital apodemes – postgenal bridge – was considered the only way to solve the<br />

question. This examination, across the family and some extra groups (Torymidae,<br />

Leucospidae, Pteromalidae Cleonyminae and Pteromalinae, Eurytomidae Heimbrinae,<br />

Buresiinae and Eurytominae), provided 24 characters which, combined with 138 other ones,<br />

allowed us to infer the phylogeny <strong>of</strong> the family, retrieved monophyletic with a high support.<br />

The Heimbrinae are the sister group <strong>of</strong> the Chalcididae. Within the family, the Cratocentrini,<br />

which otherwise exhibit very special derived states – this is the only lineage having a true<br />

postgenal bridge – branch on a basal node. The Epitraninae and Dirhininae are sister groups<br />

while Smicromorpha shares a strong synapomorphy with the Haltichellinae.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Revision <strong>of</strong> the subfamily Megaspilinae (Hymenoptera: Ceraphronoidea)<br />

Andrew Ernst*, István Mikó, Barbara J. Sharanowski & Andrew R. Deans<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, North Carolina State University, Campus box 7613, Raleigh, NC 27609-7613,<br />

USA; ernsthausen@gmail.com; istvan.miko@gmail.com; Barb.Sharanowski@gmail.com;<br />

andy_deans@ncsu.edu<br />

Megaspilinae is a diverse group, yet the limits <strong>of</strong> the seven genera are poorly known. They are<br />

parasitoids and hyperparasitoids <strong>of</strong> at least five orders <strong>of</strong> insects. Generic concepts have never<br />

been tested by any phylogenetic analysis. To test these generic concepts, we used both<br />

morphological and molecular characters. Our results hypothesize that some genera are<br />

monophyletic and some are in need <strong>of</strong> redefinition (Dendrocerus and Conostigmus). In<br />

examining morphology <strong>of</strong> Trassedia, we discovered a suite <strong>of</strong> morphological characters,<br />

including the presence <strong>of</strong> the waterstone evaporatorium, that suggest the genus Trassedia<br />

should be transferred from Megaspilidae to Ceraphronidae. All sources <strong>of</strong> data are managed<br />

using MX, an online database for systematists. Such comprehensive management <strong>of</strong> data is a<br />

novel and useful method for revisionary work such as this.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Challenges, opportunities and future strategies in the study <strong>of</strong> Microgastrinae<br />

(Braconidae)<br />

Jose L. Fernández-Triana 1* & James B. Whitfield 2<br />

1 Biodiversity Institute <strong>of</strong> Ontario, University <strong>of</strong> Guelph, Canada; jftriana@uoguelph.ca<br />

2 Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, University <strong>of</strong> Illinois, United States; jwhitfie@life.illinois.edu<br />

Microgastrine wasps are the single most important group <strong>of</strong> Lepidoptera parasitoids, with<br />

significant importance in biological control programs worldwide. Here we highlight present<br />

and future developments in the study <strong>of</strong> the subfamily, discussing major challenges and<br />

opportunities. We estimate the actual diversity <strong>of</strong> Microgastrinae (currently around 2,000<br />

described species) to be between 15-30,000 species, based on two extrapolation methods and<br />

supplemented by the study <strong>of</strong> collections from all major biogeographical regions and<br />

barcoding data from over 15,000 specimens from about 60 countries. The problems <strong>of</strong><br />

understanding such an extraordinary diversity are further complicated by the rapid<br />

evolutionary radiation <strong>of</strong> the group, the presence <strong>of</strong> numerous cryptic and morphologically<br />

similar species, the lack <strong>of</strong> comprehensive taxonomic reviews for the largest genera, and<br />

scarce and/or inaccurate information on hosts. Among the factors that might facilitate the<br />

study <strong>of</strong> the group are the availability <strong>of</strong> comprehensive databases, types concentrated in<br />

relatively few institutions, a rather organized taxonomy at supra-specific level (with some<br />

28


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

unresolved controversies), thousands <strong>of</strong> fresh specimens collected or reared, new techniques<br />

to unravel host records, DNA barcoding efforts, numerous molecular- and morphology-based<br />

phylogenetic studies, and (in a few recent efforts) the combination <strong>of</strong> several <strong>of</strong> the<br />

abovementioned approaches. We discuss strategies to take advantage <strong>of</strong> these opportunities in<br />

future research on Microgastrinae on a worldwide basis.<br />

____________________________________<br />

"The Kieffer syndrome" - endogenous taxonomic impediments in poorly known groups,<br />

as examplified by the taxonomic history <strong>of</strong> Eucoilinae (Cynipoidea: Figitidae)<br />

Mattias Forshage<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, Swedish Museum <strong>of</strong> Natural History, Box 5007, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden;<br />

generelle.morphologie@gmail.com<br />

It is well known that so-called taxonomic impediments are manifold. Infrastructural<br />

limitations and lack <strong>of</strong> funding in science are important external factors. In many poorly<br />

known groups, the unaccounted diversity in itself as well as technical difficulties in studying<br />

the animals may be considered an endogenous factor.<br />

An impediment sometimes presented by taxonomy itself is the work <strong>of</strong> previous careless<br />

taxonomists, which may leave groups in states far worse than ignorance. Enthusiasm over<br />

apriori characters and superficial variation, and lack <strong>of</strong> concern for type studies, phylogenetic<br />

questions and nomenclatural principles, can create entirely artificial classifications that take<br />

generations to tidy up. A roaring lack <strong>of</strong> knowledge can be concealed in a rigid pragmatic<br />

system and a wealth <strong>of</strong> names.<br />

I will give a brief history <strong>of</strong> the taxonomic history <strong>of</strong> the Eucoilinae, one <strong>of</strong> those groups<br />

where the fluctuation between absence <strong>of</strong> taxonomic research and very ambitious but mostly<br />

misleading taxonomic work highlights some <strong>of</strong> the basic questions <strong>of</strong> taxonomy, and present<br />

some recent efforts at taking up this challenge. We seem now to have reached up to 88%<br />

adequacy <strong>of</strong> available names in the group, compared to the all-time low <strong>of</strong> 14% after Jean-<br />

Jacques Kieffer's total revision. I will also discuss criteria for considering groups "poorly<br />

known".<br />

____________________________________<br />

When morphology is not enough: are generalist chalcid parasitoids aggregates <strong>of</strong> cryptic<br />

sibling species?<br />

Pablo Fuentes-Utrilla 1 *, James A. Nicholls 1 , Péter Bihari 2 , Julja Ernst 1 , Camille Marsan 1 &<br />

Graham N. Stone 1<br />

1 Institute <strong>of</strong> Evolutionary Biology, University <strong>of</strong> Edinburgh, Ashworth Laboratories, King’s Buildings, West<br />

Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, UK; p.fuentes@ed.ac.uk, james.nicholls@ed.ac.uk, graham.stone@ed.ac.uk<br />

2 Biological Research Centre <strong>of</strong> Hungarian Academy <strong>of</strong> Sciences, Institute <strong>of</strong> Genetics, Temesvári krt 62,<br />

Szeged 6723, Hungary<br />

Species within many insect groups are known to be hard to identify based solely on<br />

morphological characters, especially within speciose groups such as chalcid wasps. However,<br />

DNA sequences provide an alternative suite <strong>of</strong> characters to assist in species identification. This<br />

so-called DNA barcoding can be particularly useful for discovering cryptic species or ecotypes<br />

within generalist natural enemies, whereby molecular data reveal that a single generalist morphospecies<br />

actually consists <strong>of</strong> multiple more specialised genetic species – a pattern consistent with<br />

theory describing the evolution <strong>of</strong> stable foodweb interactions. Such cryptic diversity needs to<br />

29


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

be explored in order for any study <strong>of</strong> ecological interactions to be placed into the correct context.<br />

Within the community <strong>of</strong> wasps associated with cynipid oak galls, many chalcid parasitoid<br />

natural enemies have very broad host ranges and in some cases genetic data have revealed the<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> previously unknown cryptic species. Here we investigate whether two chalcid<br />

parasitoids <strong>of</strong> oak galls, Ormyrus pomaceus (Ormyridae) and Eupelmus urozonus (Eupelmidae),<br />

contain cryptic genetic lineages. Both these species have particularly broad host ranges; O.<br />

pomaceus is known to attack at least 95 species <strong>of</strong> cynipid gall inducer, while E. urozonus is<br />

exceptionally polyphagous, attacking both at least 87 oak gall species and a wide range <strong>of</strong> noncynipid<br />

hosts. We used a multi-locus DNA barcoding approach, sequencing both the standard<br />

gene used for barcoding, the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I gene (COI), plus<br />

introns from multiple nuclear loci. Although levels <strong>of</strong> sequence variation are typically lower in<br />

nuclear genes, they are an essential tool when searching for cryptic species as nuclear<br />

corroboration for mitochondrial lineages provides strong evidence for the reproductive isolation<br />

<strong>of</strong> these lineages, and hence the delimitation <strong>of</strong> cryptic species. Bayesian methods were used to<br />

construct phylogenies for the two morpho-species, and host use (both the insect attacked by the<br />

parasitoid and the host plant <strong>of</strong> the attacked insect) was then mapped onto the phylogenies. Both<br />

morpho-species were found to contain multiple cryptic lineages supported by both the nuclear<br />

and mitochondrial genomes. Cryptic species within both species complexes did not appear to be<br />

ecological specialists either at the level <strong>of</strong> host taxon or at the lower trophic level <strong>of</strong> host plant, at<br />

least within the sampling obtained from cynipid oak galls. One lineage with the E. urozonus<br />

complex was sampled almost exclusively from leaf-mining caterpillars on oak trees, although<br />

one individual from this lineage was also sampled from an oak cynipid gall, indicating that the<br />

communities <strong>of</strong> natural enemies attacking leaf-mining caterpillars and cynipid galls occasionally<br />

exchange members. The presence <strong>of</strong> cryptic generalist parasitoids within the oak gall<br />

community highlights the need for further ecological study <strong>of</strong> these cryptic lineages to explain<br />

how multiple ecologically similar species co-exist within the same community and to describe<br />

impacts on trophic interactions mediated by increased numbers <strong>of</strong> apparently generalist natural<br />

enemies.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Ichneumonidae collected from the Suez Canal and North Sinai regions, Egypt<br />

(Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea)<br />

Neveen Samy Gadallah 1* , Rowaida Saleh Ahmad 2 , Ahmed El-Heneidy 3 &<br />

Samar Mohammed Mahmoud 3<br />

1 Entomology Department, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Science, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt; n_gadallah@yahoo.com<br />

2 Zoology Department, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Science, Suez canal University, Ismailia, Egypt; rowaida_@msn.com<br />

3 Department <strong>of</strong> Biological Control, Plant Protection Research Institute, Agriculture Research Center, Giza,<br />

Egypt; aheneidy@link.net<br />

The present study is carried out to investigate and review the species <strong>of</strong> the family<br />

Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) attacking different pests <strong>of</strong> cultivated plants<br />

in Suez Canal (especially Ismailia) and N. Sinai (especially El- Arish) regions. Collection was<br />

done using the Japanese sweeping net and Malaise trap during the period 2007-2009.<br />

A total <strong>of</strong> 31 ichneumonid species belonging to 23 genera and 10 subfamilies: Anomaloninae<br />

(2 genera, 3 species), Banchinae (1sp.), Campopleginae (7 genera, 10 species), Cryptinae (3<br />

genera, 4 species), Diplazontinae (2 genera, 2 species), Ichneumoninae (2genera, 2 species),<br />

Metopiinae (1species), Ophioninae (2 genera, 3 species), Pimplinae (2 genera, 3 species) and<br />

Tryphoninae (1 genus, 2 species). Of these seven species are new records to the fauna <strong>of</strong><br />

Egypt.<br />

30


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

The collecting data <strong>of</strong> the ichneumonid species, their hosts as well as their previous records in<br />

Egypt is given. Almost all the listed species are not previously recorded from the two regions<br />

under study except for: Venturia canescens (Gravenhorst) and Enicospilus ramidulus (Linn.)<br />

were previously recorded from W. Rabdet (N.Sinai) and Ophion obscuratus Fab., previously<br />

recorded from Ismailia (Suez Canal Region) and El-Zaraniq (N.Sinai).<br />

____________________________________<br />

Calosota Curtis (Chalcidoidea: Eupelmidae) — pulling the proverbial thread <strong>of</strong><br />

knowledge<br />

Gary A.P. Gibson<br />

Canadian National Collection <strong>of</strong> Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes (CNC), Agriculture & Agri-food Canada,<br />

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Gary.Gibson@agr.gov.ca<br />

Calosota Curtis (Chalcidoidea: Eupelmidae) is a comparatively small genus <strong>of</strong> parasitoid<br />

wasps that primarily attack woodboring beetles. Eight species have been included in the genus<br />

in the New World, including 3 from South America and 5 from North America, whereas 13<br />

valid species are recognized in Europe. In 2009 specimens were received for identification<br />

that were reared from the goldspotted oak borer, Agrilus coxalis Waterhouse (Coleoptera:<br />

Buprestidae), a pest <strong>of</strong> oaks in California. Initial study suggested that these specimens<br />

represented a new species and the foolish promise to describe it because <strong>of</strong> its potential for<br />

biocontrol <strong>of</strong> the pest. Additional study to adequately characterize the new species quickly led<br />

to the discovery <strong>of</strong> other undescribed North American species in the CNC and a full revision<br />

<strong>of</strong> the genus for the region. This resulted in the discovery that some <strong>of</strong> the North American<br />

species extend further south into Central America and West Indies and enlarging the revision<br />

to include these regions. Study to ensure correct nomenclature also suggested that three <strong>of</strong> the<br />

five described North American species occur also in Europe under other names, which led to<br />

a “review” <strong>of</strong> the European species. The results <strong>of</strong> what started out as a single species<br />

description but ended up in a revision <strong>of</strong> the West Indies and North and Central American<br />

species, including the description <strong>of</strong> 7 new species, 7 new synonyms for North American and<br />

European names, the resurrection <strong>of</strong> 2 European species names, observations on 9 other<br />

European names, and the transfer <strong>of</strong> 2 South American species to other genera will be<br />

summarized.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Recent advances in the chromosomal studies <strong>of</strong> the superfamilies<br />

Cynipoidea and Chalcidoidea<br />

Vladimir E. Gokhman<br />

Botanical Garden, Moscow State University, Moscow 119991 Russia; gokhman@bg.msu.ru<br />

Chromosomes <strong>of</strong> about 200 species <strong>of</strong> parasitic wasps that belong to 16 families <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Chalcidoidea and Cynipoidea have been studied up to now. Although overall karyotypic<br />

features <strong>of</strong> those groups are summarized in my recently published monograph, Karyotypes <strong>of</strong><br />

Parasitic Hymenoptera, the described pattern must be updated with a number <strong>of</strong> new results.<br />

Specifically, these results confirm that the chromosome set containing eleven subtelocentrics<br />

or acrocentrics is likely to be ancestral for the superfamily Chalcidoidea. Moreover, modern<br />

karyotypic information blurs an apparent border between the so-called "high-numbered" and<br />

"low-numbered" families <strong>of</strong> the Chalcidoidea having n = 8-12 and 3-7 respectively.<br />

Mymaridae, the most basal chalcid family, is the only taxon <strong>of</strong> its rank that has fully retained<br />

31


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

a relatively high chromosome number, n = 9. In other groups <strong>of</strong> the superfamily Chalcidoidea<br />

that were supposed to be entirely high-numbered, i.e. Encyrtidae (n = 8-12) and Eurytomidae<br />

(n = 9-10), species with lower chromosome numbers have been recently detected. For<br />

example, n = 5, 6, and 7 were found in Eurytoma compressa (Fabricius), Eu. serratulae<br />

(Fabricius), and Eu. robusta Mayr respectively. These species are likely to form a wellsupported<br />

clade within their genus. Another originally high-numbered chalcid family,<br />

Aphelinidae, also harbours groups with lower chromosome numbers, i.e. all Aphelininae and<br />

a few species <strong>of</strong> Encarsia. Species with higher n values (7 to 10) are now detected in the<br />

family Eupelmidae that generally has lower chromosome numbers (n = 5-6). In addition, n =<br />

10 has been recently found in two species <strong>of</strong> the genus Podagrion, whereas n = 4-6 were<br />

detected in other Torymidae. Among the "low-numbered" families, n = 6 has been found in<br />

the first studied species <strong>of</strong> the family Agaonidae, Blastophaga psenes (Linnaeus). The<br />

karyotype containing five large metacentrics and a small subtelocentric or acrocentric is<br />

considered the ground plan feature <strong>of</strong> the common lineage that includes Torymidae,<br />

Ormyridae, and Agaonidae. The same karyotype structure is also found in Euderomphale<br />

chelidonii Erdös that belongs to Euderomphalini, the most basal tribe <strong>of</strong> the subfamily<br />

Entedoninae (Eulophidae). In the superfamily Cynipoidea that generally contains highnumbered<br />

species (n = 9-11), low chromosome numbers were detected in the genera Andricus<br />

(Cynipidae, n = 5-6) and Leptopilina (Figitidae, n = 5). Chromosomal characters can be used<br />

in species-level taxonomy <strong>of</strong> certain genera <strong>of</strong> parasitic wasps that belong to the Chalcidoidea<br />

and Cynipoidea. For example, Metaphycus flavus (Howard) and M. luteolus (Timberlake)<br />

(Encyrtidae) both have n = 10, whereas M. angustifrons Compere has n = 9, and M. stanleyi<br />

Compere has n = 5. Analogously, n = 10, 9, and 5 were found in Leptopilina heterotoma<br />

(Thomson), L. boulardi Barbotin, Carton et Keiner-Pillault, and L. clavipes (Hartig)<br />

respectively.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Evolution <strong>of</strong> solitary and gregarious development in parasitoids: what we can learn<br />

from Entedon wasps (Chalcidoidea: Eulophidae)<br />

Alex Gumovsky<br />

Schmalhausen Institute <strong>of</strong> Zoology, 15 Bogdan Khmelnitsky St., 01601 Kiev-30, Ukraine;<br />

gumovsky@izan.kiev.ua, entedon@gmail.com<br />

Nominal difference between solitary and gregarious parasitoids concerns number <strong>of</strong> siblings<br />

developing in the same host. However, the ability to be gregarious may concern degree <strong>of</strong><br />

tolerance between sibling larvae, rather than simply number <strong>of</strong> the eggs laid. Wasps <strong>of</strong> the<br />

genus Entedon are larval or egg-larval, gregarious or solitary endoparasitoids <strong>of</strong> Coleoptera<br />

(mostly weevils and bean beetles). Evolution <strong>of</strong> life history traits in this genus was<br />

reconstructed by phylogenetic analysis <strong>of</strong> nuclear ribosomal (D2 <strong>of</strong> 28S) and mitochondrial<br />

(COI and Cyt B) gene regions. The analysis suggests that gregarious parasitism originated<br />

more than once in larval and egg-larval parasitoids. Also, the egg-larval parasitism is rather<br />

common (or even predominant) parasitism in the genus. The preimaginal development also<br />

differs in solitary and gregarious parasitoids. The solitary parasitoids physically eliminate<br />

other rival larvae during their first instar, which is armed with sharp mandibles. In egg-larval<br />

gregarious parasitoids the active “fighting” first instar is ommited: it is embryonized and the<br />

early development <strong>of</strong> the larva takes place within an extraembryonic cellular membrane. The<br />

larva, which corresponds to the second instar <strong>of</strong> solitary Entedon species, is formed directly<br />

from the proliferating cells inside this extraembryonic membrane. This embryonization <strong>of</strong><br />

“fighters“ may be an approach to avoid killing <strong>of</strong> siblings by aggressive first instars.<br />

32


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

However, larval gregarious parasitoids <strong>of</strong> Entedon have typical “fighter” first instars, which<br />

are just somewhat less mobile and molt quicker to the second instar, than in solitary<br />

parasitoids. So, the larval tolerance may be achieved in two ways: by losing <strong>of</strong> aggressive<br />

instars (egg-larval gregarious species <strong>of</strong> Entedon) or by lower mobility and faster<br />

development <strong>of</strong> these instars (larval gregarious species <strong>of</strong> Entedon).<br />

____________________________________<br />

Wild Bee Diversity <strong>of</strong> Sweet Cherry Orchards in Sultandaı Reservoir (Turkey)<br />

Yasemin Güler 1* , A. Murat Aytekin 2 & Fatih Dikmen 2<br />

1 Plant Protection Central Research Institute, Gayret Mahallesi, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Bulvari, No 66, 06172<br />

Yenimahalle/Ankara, Turkey; yaseminguler@gmail.com<br />

2 Hacettepe University, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Science, Department <strong>of</strong> Biology, 06800 Beytepe/Ankara, Turkey;<br />

ama@hacettepe.edu.tr; dikmen@hacettepe.edu.tr<br />

Many varieties <strong>of</strong> sweet cherry are self-incompatible. Therefore, sweet cherry orchards<br />

require a huge population <strong>of</strong> pollinator bees that would carry out the adequate amount <strong>of</strong><br />

pollen transfer between the different varieties. In practice, the honeybee is the main pollinator<br />

used in sweet cherry orchards. But the wild bees are more efficient than the honeybee in<br />

unfavourable climatic conditions. This study was undertaken in the sweet cherry orchards in<br />

Sultandaı (Afyonkarahisar province) and Akehir (Konya province) towns, Turkey. Bees<br />

were collected by Malaise trap from three sweet cherry orchards in the period between April-<br />

May in 2008 and 2009 to study the composition and richness <strong>of</strong> wild bee species. The traps<br />

were set in the bud swell period and lifted in the green fruit period. A total number <strong>of</strong> 1980<br />

bee specimens, belonging to 86 species and five families (Andrenidae, Halictidae, Apidae,<br />

Antophoridae, Megachilidae) were collected. Although the abundance <strong>of</strong> bee populations<br />

varied from year to year and from orchard to orchard in the family level, the members <strong>of</strong><br />

Halictidae presented the greatest species richness both in 2008 and 2009. The results <strong>of</strong> the<br />

study were evaluated by Shannon-Wiener (H) and Simpson (D) diversity indexes. Differences<br />

in bee diversity among three orchards were shown.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Hotspots <strong>of</strong> Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera) Fauna in Natural Protection Areas <strong>of</strong> East<br />

Mediteranean Region in Turkey<br />

Mehmet Faruk Gürbüz* & Ayegül Özdan<br />

Süleyman Demirel University Department <strong>of</strong> Biology, Isparta, Turkey; mfg@fef.sdu.edu.tr<br />

Halep Çamlıı, Kengerlidüz, Habib-i Neccar Natural Protection Areas which have different<br />

ecological characters chosen from East Mediterranian Region. This study was conducted<br />

between March-September for each site during 2007-2008 at day in monthly intervals. It is<br />

also one <strong>of</strong> the most remarkable regions <strong>of</strong> the world in terms <strong>of</strong> the biodiversity hotspots<br />

such that 3 <strong>of</strong> them have major extensions into Turkey: Caucasus, Irano- Anatolian, and<br />

Mediterranean Basin (Myers et al., 2000) Consequently, 54 species <strong>of</strong> Ichneumonidae were<br />

recorded; 20 species are belonging to Mediterranean Hotspot, 9 species are belonging to<br />

meditterranean - Caucasus Hotspots, 3 species Meditterranean - Caucasus - Irano-Anatolian<br />

Hotspots, 6 species Meditterranean - Irano-Anatolian Hotspots. 5 species did not found in<br />

these hotspots.<br />

Insects prone to reaching to hotspots. Banchopsis crassicornis, Syrphoctonus nigritarsus,<br />

Orthocentrus radialis are found first <strong>of</strong> all in Mediterranean, after pasted time, these<br />

33


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

parasitoids are found in Irano Anatolian hotspots. As a result, we can say that if these<br />

parasitoids are in two regions, may be they can arrive at Caucasus hotspot.<br />

Lissonota lineata, Pion fortipes, Syrphophilus bizonarius spread three in hotspots. According<br />

to Yu et al., 2006, these ichneumonids were found first in Mediterranean hotspot, second in<br />

Irano Anatolian hotspot and lastly in Caucasus hotspot. Consequently, we can say that these<br />

ichneumonids may have followed these routes.<br />

Lathrolestes ungularis, Diaparsis nitida, Gelanes fusculus, Gelanes simillimus, Tersilochus<br />

nitens, which are in Palearctic region, did not find in three hotspots. These species reach to<br />

Mediterranean hotspot.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Investigating the genetic control <strong>of</strong> gall induction in Cynipid gallwasps<br />

Jack Hearn 1 *, Graham N. Stone 1 , Mark Blaxter 1 , Joseph Shorthouse 2 & The GenePool 1<br />

1 Institute <strong>of</strong> Evolutionary Biology, University <strong>of</strong> Edinburgh, King's Buildings, West Mains Road, Edinburgh,<br />

EH9 3JF United Kingdom; J.Hearn@sms.ed.ac.uk; Graham.Stone@ed.ac.uk; mark.blaxter@ed.ac.uk<br />

2 Department <strong>of</strong> Biology, Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ontario, P3E 2C6 Canada; jshorthouse@laurentian.ca<br />

Cynipid gallwasps induce complex and morphologically diverse galls on highly-conserved<br />

host plants, the mechanism utilized is a long-standing entomological mystery. With the advent<br />

<strong>of</strong> new high-throughput sequencing technologies traits <strong>of</strong> non-model organisms with complex<br />

life-histories have become amenable to study. We are using a combination <strong>of</strong> Illumina GAIIx<br />

and Roche 454 sequencing to generate genomic data and expressed transcripts at key larval<br />

plus adult life stages to determine the genetic control <strong>of</strong> gall induction. Genomic data will be<br />

used for Cynipid genes <strong>of</strong> viral origin, analogous to virus-like-particle structural genes<br />

previously identified in some Polydnavirus utilizing Ichneumonoidea wasp genomes. It will<br />

also aid transcriptome assembly. Transcriptome sequencing <strong>of</strong> larvae during the initial gall<br />

induction phase will provide a set <strong>of</strong> candidate genes for control <strong>of</strong> gall-induction when<br />

controlled for by expression in other life-stage. A comparative approach using two species<br />

from different cynipid clades will test for a common conserved mechanism. The Palaearctic<br />

oak apple forming Biorhiza pallida and the Nearctic rose galler Diplolepis spinosa have been<br />

selected for this purpose. Results from initial genome sequencing, assembly and analysis are<br />

presented as is the plan for transcriptome sequencing.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Relationships <strong>of</strong> Chalcidoidea: a molecular and morphological approach<br />

John Heraty 1 , Roger Burks 2 , James Munro 3 , Johan Liljeblad 4 , Matthew Yoder 5 &<br />

Elizabeth Murray 6 *<br />

1 Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, University <strong>of</strong> California, Riverside, CA 92521 USA; john.heraty@ucr.edu,<br />

2 burks.roger@gmail.com, 3 jbmunro@gmail.com, 4 cynips@gmail.com; 6 elizabeth.murray@email.ucr.edu<br />

5 Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695 USA; diapriid@gmail.com<br />

Chalcidoidea are economically and ecologically one <strong>of</strong> the most important groups <strong>of</strong><br />

Hymenoptera. They are a hyperdiverse group <strong>of</strong> insects with more than 500,000 estimated<br />

species currently allocated to about 89 subfamilies in 19 families. Perhaps not surprisingly,<br />

there is little consensus on relationships in the group, and there has never been a<br />

comprehensive phylogenetic analysis <strong>of</strong> the superfamily. We address their relationships using<br />

two approaches. First, a molecular phylogeny <strong>of</strong> 720 taxa including 51 outgroups using a<br />

secondary structure alignment for partial 18S and 28S sequences. Second, a morphological<br />

34


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

approach based on scoring 243 characters for more than 200 representative taxa using MX, an<br />

on-line content management system, with the help <strong>of</strong> numerous collaborators worldwide.<br />

Results <strong>of</strong> the independent and combined results will be presented in an attempt to resolve the<br />

family level relationships in the superfamily.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Evolution <strong>of</strong> egg parasitism under water in parasitoid Hymenoptera<br />

Yoshimi Hirose<br />

Faculty <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8581, Japan; hirosey@jcom.home.ne.jp<br />

Parasitoid Hymenoptera are species-rich in nearly all terrestrial ecosystems, but the richness<br />

<strong>of</strong> hymenopterous parasitoids <strong>of</strong> aquatic insects is rather limited, given the species richness <strong>of</strong><br />

potential aquatic hosts. Clearly, the aquatic habitat has been a barrier to parasitism by<br />

parasitoid Hymenoptera. However, subsurface egg parasitism <strong>of</strong> aquatic insects is not so rare.<br />

In the evolution <strong>of</strong> this type <strong>of</strong> egg parasitism, there are four reproductive strategies for<br />

parasitoid females that lack adaptations to dive and attack eggs <strong>of</strong> aquatic insects. Such<br />

parasitoids can exploit aquatic hosts in the following ways: (1) when the host’s eggs are laid<br />

on plants and other substrates above water, (2) when the host’s eggs are exposed above water<br />

at some point in their life cycle, (3) if the females walk down among the plants bearing these<br />

hosts under water (i.e., when the hosts are always under water), and (4) by swimming in<br />

search <strong>of</strong> hosts that are always under water. The last step is highly evolved, and is found in at<br />

least three families, Trichogrammatidae, Mymaridae and Scelionidae. Thus, females <strong>of</strong><br />

species <strong>of</strong> some genera belonging to these families are well adapted to searching the hosts<br />

under water, but their searching by swimming might be largely limited to the hosts in ponds<br />

rather than those in streams. Such parasitoid females must have a difficulty in searching the<br />

hosts in flowing water because <strong>of</strong> their small size. Evolution <strong>of</strong> egg parasitoids also is under<br />

the ecological constraints <strong>of</strong> their small size since their hosts are usually smaller than those <strong>of</strong><br />

larval or pupal parasitoids.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Parasitoids <strong>of</strong> Choristoneura spp. (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in the Nearctic region<br />

John T. Huber 1 * & José Fernández-Triana 2<br />

1 Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; john.huber@agr.gc.ca<br />

2 Biodiversity Insitute <strong>of</strong> Ontario, Guelph, ON and Canadian National Collection <strong>of</strong> Insects, Ottawa, ON,<br />

Canada; jftriana@uoguelph.ca<br />

The genus Choristoneura (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) includes several economically important<br />

pests in North America. The Eastern spruce budworm, C. fumiferanae is the most devastating<br />

pest <strong>of</strong> conifers in eastern North America but six others are also important in forestry (C.<br />

biennis, C. conflictana, C. pinus, C. occidentalis) or agriculture (C. rosaceana, C. parallela)<br />

in many parts <strong>of</strong> the continent. Decades <strong>of</strong> biological studies have resulted in literature<br />

records for 230 parasitoids in 106 genera from 11 <strong>of</strong> the 16 Nearctic species, including 50<br />

species <strong>of</strong> Braconidae in 18 genera, 113 species <strong>of</strong> Ichneumonidae in 45 genera, 51 species <strong>of</strong><br />

Chalcidoidea in 29 genera (9 families), 1 species <strong>of</strong> Bethylidae, and 15 species (13 genera) <strong>of</strong><br />

Tachinidae. Illustrated identification keys to most <strong>of</strong> the species and all <strong>of</strong> the genera were<br />

produced over the past 15 years by four taxonomists (J. Huber, A. Bennett, J. O’Hara, J.<br />

Fernández-Triana) based at the CNC, Ottawa. An additional 36 species (14%) <strong>of</strong> parasitoids<br />

are erroneous associations.<br />

35


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Choristoneura fumiferanae has the highest number <strong>of</strong> parasitoids: 122 species (53%) <strong>of</strong> the<br />

total for Nearctic Choristoneura. Rearings from the pest species together account for 90% <strong>of</strong><br />

the parasitoid species. Only 16 parasitoid species (7%) were reared from more than 5<br />

Choristoneura species. The proportion varied considerably between Tachinidae, where 9 <strong>of</strong><br />

15 (60%) species attacked more than 5 hosts, and Hymenoptera, where only 7 <strong>of</strong> 215 (7%)<br />

species attacked more than 5 hosts. Half <strong>of</strong> the parasitoid species, including those that are<br />

hyperparasitoids, were reared from only one Choristoneura species. The number <strong>of</strong><br />

apparently monophagous parasitoids (on Choristoneura) is probably artificially inflated<br />

because 20 chalcid hyperparasitic species were added to the number considered to have<br />

emerged from only 1 Choristoneura species. If they are ignored the number <strong>of</strong> apparent<br />

monophages is still 112 species (48.3%). The most common genera reared are Glypta spp.<br />

(Banchinae), Apanteles spp. (Microgastrinae), Meteorus spp. (Meteorinae), and Macrocentrus<br />

spp. (Macrocentrinae).<br />

The only comparable taxonomic study to the four papers on Nearctic Choristoneura<br />

parasitoids is for Nearctic Rhyacionia (pine tip or pine shoot moths, Tortricidae). Yates<br />

(1967) reported 100 parasitoid species (53 genera) in 10 families, essentially the same ones as<br />

for Choristoneura. These were reported from 8 <strong>of</strong> the 11 species/subspecies <strong>of</strong> Rhyacionia (at<br />

the time 11 species were recognized; now 27 are). Most <strong>of</strong> the records came from only two<br />

species: R. buoliana, a European alien invasive species, and R. frustrana, a native species.<br />

Yates excluded another 27 species (27%) as erroneous associations.<br />

The value <strong>of</strong> producing artificial identification keys to particular pest species or genera as<br />

opposed to ‘natural’ keys to taxa is discussed in light <strong>of</strong> the scarcity <strong>of</strong> parasitic Hymenoptera<br />

taxonomists relative to the size <strong>of</strong> the taxa they study.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Progress in taxonomy and systematics <strong>of</strong> Platygastroidea: new taxa, tools, and troubles<br />

Norman F. Johnson* & Luciana Musetti<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Evolution, Ecology and Organismal Biology, The Ohio State University, 1315 Kinnear Road,<br />

Columbus, Ohio 43212 USA; johnson.2@osu.edu; musetti.2@osu.edu<br />

The Platygastroidea PBI is a project focusing on elaboration <strong>of</strong> the knowledge <strong>of</strong> species and<br />

genera <strong>of</strong> the superfamily, including both alpha taxonomy, new collectings, and phylogenetic<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> relationships. The results elaborated over the past three years are described, along<br />

with the cyberinfrastructural tools used to accelerate and increase the accuracy <strong>of</strong> the work.<br />

Prospects for the final two years <strong>of</strong> the project are discussed.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Entomophagous complex associated with the insects on Heracleum platytaenium<br />

(Apiaceae) in Turkey, with new records<br />

Erhan Koçak<br />

Plant Protection Central Research Institute, Ankara, Turkey; erhan_kocak@hotmail.com<br />

In this study, the entomophagous insect complex with hosts on endemic plant Heracleum<br />

platytaenium Boiss. (Apiaceae) were determined. For that, 17 parasitic hymenopters and 3<br />

predators were reared from their host insects, Coleoptera, Hemiptera, Lepidoptera, and<br />

Diptera found in umbels, stems and branches <strong>of</strong> H. platytaenium. This plant contains<br />

furanocoumarins that are insect repellents and suppress growth in some species. Plant<br />

materials with insects were collected from Ankara and Bolu provinces in July-September<br />

36


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

2007-2008. All parasitoids belonging to Hymenoptera obtained from egg batches <strong>of</strong> some<br />

hemipters are Ooencyrtus telenomicida (Vassiliev) (Encyrtidae), Trissolcus grandis<br />

(Thomson) and Telenomus heydeni Mayr (Scelionidae) from Graphosoma lineatum L.<br />

(Hemiptera: Pentatomidae); Ooencyrtus kuvanae (Howard) from Dolycoris baccarum (L.);<br />

Gryon leptocorisae (Howard) from predator Rhynocoris punctiventris (Herrich-Schaeffer)<br />

(Hemiptera: Reduviidae). The ectoparasitoids obtained from larvae <strong>of</strong> the weevil and moths<br />

are Odontepyris sp. (Bethylidae) as from a moth larva in the branch, Bracon piger (Wesmael)<br />

and Ascogaster quadridentata (Wesmael) (Braconidae) from Epinotia thapsiana (Zeller)<br />

(Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in the umbel; Pristomerus vulnerator (Panzer) and Aritranis<br />

confusator Aubert (Ichneumonidae) from Lixus nordmanni Hochhuht (Coleoptera:<br />

Curculionidae) (New host) in the branch. Also an endoparasitoid Baryscapus crassicornis<br />

(Erdös) (Eulophidae) was obtained from larvae <strong>of</strong> L. nordmanni (New host) in the stem and<br />

branch. As to the pupa parasitoids, Didyctium brunnea (Belizin) (Eucolidae) was reared from<br />

puparia <strong>of</strong> Lasiambia albidipennis (Strobl) (Diptera: Chloropidae) (New host); Pronotalia<br />

carlinarum (Szelenyi and Erdos) (Eulophidae) and Homoporus febriculosus (Girault)<br />

(Pteromalidae) from Melanagromyza heracleana Zlobin (Diptera: Agromyzidae) (new host),<br />

and B. crassicornis from Lixus nordmanni Hochhuht (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) (New host)<br />

in the stem and branches <strong>of</strong> the plant. B. crassicornis also emerged from adults <strong>of</strong> L.<br />

nordmanni. It is larval, larval-pupal, pupal and pupal-adult parasitoid, not directly adult.<br />

Aphelinus mali (Haldeman) were reared from the aphids (Hemiptera: Aphididae) on the plant.<br />

As predators, R. punctiventris (Hemiptera: Reduviidae), Scaeva pyrastri (L.) and Eupeodes<br />

corollae (F.) (Diptera: Syriphidae) on the plant, and spider hunters Miscophus bicolor Jurine<br />

and Trypoxylon attenuatum F.Smith (Crabronidae) in the stem were determined. The any<br />

parasitoids <strong>of</strong> flies M. heracleana and L. albidipennis were not known. So, these records are<br />

the first parasitoid records for the flies. Chloropidae is new host family for D. brunnea after<br />

Phoridae. In addition, Aritranis confusator, Gryon leptocorisae, Didyctium brunnea and<br />

Homoporus febriculosus are recorded from Turkey for the first time.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Biology <strong>of</strong> egg parasitoids Trissolcus semistriatus Nees and Trissolcus grandis Thomson<br />

(Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) on Graphosoma lineatum L. (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) in<br />

laboratory conditions<br />

Münevver Kodan 1* & M. Oktay Gürkan 2<br />

1 Plant Protection Central Research Institute, Gayret Mah., Fatih Sultan Mehmet Bulv., No 66, 06172,<br />

Yenimahalle/Ankara, Turkey; munevverkodan@gmail.com<br />

2 Ankara University, Agriculture Faculty, Department <strong>of</strong> Plant Protection, Ankara, Turkey;<br />

M.Oktay.Gürkan@agri.ankara.edu.tr<br />

Egg parasitoids Trissolcus species (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) are the most important natural<br />

enemies <strong>of</strong> sunn pest. In this study, biological parameters <strong>of</strong> Trissolcus semistriatus Nees and<br />

T. grandis Thomson such as parasitisation, emergence and sex ratios, development,<br />

oviposition and postoviposition periods, and longevity were determined using eggs <strong>of</strong><br />

Graphosoma lineatum L. (Hemiptera:Pentatomidae) as host.<br />

To find out biological parameters <strong>of</strong> T. semistriatus and T. grandis investigations were carried<br />

out at 25±1 ° C temperature, 70±5% relative humidity and L:D 16:8 photoperiod in laboratory<br />

conditions. Three clusters <strong>of</strong> G. lineatum, which were 42 eggs, were <strong>of</strong>fered to the females for<br />

parasitisation. Each day, parasitoids were transferred glass tube contained 42 host eggs, and<br />

this process was continued until female parasitoid death. Experiments were conducted to for<br />

each parasitoids species separately and 10 replicate.<br />

37


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

At the end <strong>of</strong> the investigations; developmental times were determined as average <strong>of</strong><br />

13.62±0.01 and 11.48±0.13 days for female and male <strong>of</strong> T. semistriatus, respectively. Similar<br />

results were also obtained for T. grandis. Both <strong>of</strong> parasitoids species males emerged before<br />

two days than females. Females lived significantly longer than males. While the female <strong>of</strong> T.<br />

semistriatus parasited an average <strong>of</strong> 173.70 ±10.69 eggs during longevity, it was found an<br />

average <strong>of</strong> 151.60±14.66 eggs for the female <strong>of</strong> T. grandis. Emergence range <strong>of</strong> T.<br />

semistriatus and T. grandis were determined between 17.50- 93.04% and 31.66- 91.46%<br />

respectively. It was designated that sex ratio was in favour <strong>of</strong> female at first ten days <strong>of</strong><br />

parasitoids life time and in favour <strong>of</strong> male with increasing parasitoids age. Effective mass<br />

rearing time for both <strong>of</strong> parasitoids was also carried by these data results.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Basics First – the phylogeny <strong>of</strong> the brood parasitic Nyssonini (Hymenoptera: Apoidea)<br />

Stefanie Krause* & Michael Ohl<br />

Museum für Naturkunde, Leibniz-Institut für Evolutions- und Biodiversitätsforschung an der Humboldt-<br />

Universität zu Berlin, Invalidenstraße 43, 10115 Berlin, Germany; stefanie.krause@mfn-berlin.de;<br />

michael.ohl@mfn-berlin.de<br />

In most species <strong>of</strong> apoid wasps, the females build their own nests and stock the brood cells<br />

with paralyzed prey. Remarkable exceptions are the Nyssonini, a poorly studied tribe <strong>of</strong><br />

worldwide distribution: All <strong>of</strong> the more than 200 recent species are assumed to be obligate<br />

brood parasites. That is, they use the nests and larval food provided by females <strong>of</strong> other<br />

crabronid wasps for their own <strong>of</strong>fspring. Obligate brood parasitism evolved several times<br />

independently in different groups <strong>of</strong> aculeates, for example within the Pompilidae and<br />

Sapygidae. However, within the apoid wasps, this alternative behavior probably evolved<br />

twice, in the genus Stizoides and in the Nyssonini. Despite their extraordinary mode <strong>of</strong><br />

parental care, which spotlight the Nyssonini, their biology, evolution and even taxonomy are<br />

still only poorly understood. As an essential prerequisite for further research on this group, the<br />

current work aims to conduct a first cladistic analysis. The genus level analysis presented here<br />

is based on 43 morphological characters. It includes 34 terminal taxa, which represent the 18<br />

nyssonine genera, as well as three outgroup-species belonging to the Alyssontini and<br />

Bembicini respectively. The result supports the monophyly <strong>of</strong> the Nyssonini and <strong>of</strong> most<br />

nyssonine genera. Nursea and Nippononysson, repeatedly described as basal genera within the<br />

Nyssonini, form a monophyletic group, which actually branches <strong>of</strong>f early within the tribe. The<br />

monophyly <strong>of</strong> Foxia + (Cresson + (Perisson + Antomartinezius)), traditionally regarded as<br />

very close-knit group, is supported. It is found to be the sister taxon to the rather derived<br />

monophylum (Hovanysson camelus + Brachystegus) + (Acanthostethus + (Zanysson +<br />

(Metanysson + (Idionysson + Losada)))). The relationship between the disputable genera<br />

Nysson and Synnevrus remains unresolved. However, each <strong>of</strong> these two genera is shown to be<br />

not monophyletic. Hovanysson also constitutes an artificial group and needs to be revised.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Australian spider wasp systematics (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae) – clearing up more than<br />

200 years <strong>of</strong> confusion and misclassification<br />

Lars Krogmann 1 * & Andrew D. Austin 2<br />

1 Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart, Germany; krogmann.smns@naturkundemuseum-bw.de<br />

2 Australian Centre for Evolutionary Biology and Biodiversity, School <strong>of</strong> Earth and Environmental Sciences, The<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Adelaide, Australia; andy.austin@adelaide.edu.au<br />

38


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

The first Australian spider wasp was collected during James Cook’s famous exploration <strong>of</strong><br />

Terra Australis and described by Fabricius in 1775. In the following two centuries Australian<br />

pompilids have received relatively little attention and were never comprehensively treated.<br />

The continent’s fauna is huge with an estimate <strong>of</strong> more than 500 species, about 60% <strong>of</strong> which<br />

are still undescribed. The generic level classification is confusing and no identification keys<br />

are available for most <strong>of</strong> the fauna. Large numbers <strong>of</strong> Australian species have been<br />

misclassified by previous authors in European genera such as Cryptocheilus and Priocnemis,<br />

which do not occur in Australia. The subfamily Pepsinae is taxonomically most problematic<br />

as it comprises the poorest studied Australian genera. Many <strong>of</strong> these genera are endemic to<br />

Australia, have been described on the basis <strong>of</strong> single specimens and lack proper generic<br />

diagnoses. Numerous pepsine genera also exhibit a striking level <strong>of</strong> sexual dimorphism,<br />

which complicates sex associations. In many genera males have either remained undescribed<br />

(see Krogmann et al. 2008) or are classified in other genera, sometimes even in different<br />

subfamilies. A recent catalogue <strong>of</strong> Australian pompilids (Elliott 2007) summarizes the current<br />

taxonomic state <strong>of</strong> the fauna and highlights some <strong>of</strong> the major problems. Here we outline the<br />

results <strong>of</strong> a 4-year study that recognizes 44 genera <strong>of</strong> Australian pompilids, five <strong>of</strong> which are<br />

recorded from the continent for the fist time. Most pepsine genera are reclassified resulting in<br />

dozens <strong>of</strong> new combinations and new synonomies. In addition we recognize a number <strong>of</strong><br />

species groups that do not fit into existing genera and which will be formally described in<br />

future studies. Our generic synopsis also presents large amounts <strong>of</strong> new distributional data<br />

and new host records based on museum collections and recent fieldwork.<br />

References<br />

Elliott, M. (2007) Annotated catalogue <strong>of</strong> the Pompilidae (Hymenoptera) <strong>of</strong> Australia Zootaxa<br />

1428, 1-83.<br />

Krogmann, L., Day, M.C & Austin A.D. (2008) A new spider wasp from Western Australia,<br />

with a description <strong>of</strong> the first known male <strong>of</strong> the genus Eremocurgus (Hymenoptera:<br />

Pompilidae). Records <strong>of</strong> the Western Australian Museum 24, 437-441.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Biogeography <strong>of</strong> the mutillid wasps (Hymenoptera, Mutillidae) in the Palaearctic region<br />

Arkady S. Lelej<br />

Institute <strong>of</strong> Biology and Soil Science, Russian Academy <strong>of</strong> Sciences, Far Eastern Branch, Vladivostok, Russia;<br />

lelej@biosoil.ru<br />

The Mutillidae is a large family <strong>of</strong> solitary wasps which currently numbers 208 genera and<br />

about 4200 described (c. 6000 estimated) species. Their greatest diversity occurs in the<br />

tropical and subtropical regions <strong>of</strong> the world. The Palaearctic fauna numbers 57 genera<br />

including 14 endemic ones and 506 species.<br />

The distributions <strong>of</strong> 57 genera in seven biogeographical subregions, as well as the dispersal<br />

patterns <strong>of</strong> nine subfamilies and distribution <strong>of</strong> 302 species in 24 Palaearctic local faunas,<br />

were analysed. Faunal similarities between five biogeographical regions <strong>of</strong> the Palaearctic<br />

were evaluated by using Sørensen's coefficient <strong>of</strong> similarity. The similarity matrix resulting<br />

from pair-wise calculations was then presented by dendrograms, ordination, and Terent'ev<br />

pleiades.<br />

The subfamilies Mutillinae (265 species, 30 genera), Dasylabrinae (103 species, five genera),<br />

and Myrmillinae (65 species, nine genera) are those most diverse in the Palaearctic region.<br />

Subfamilies Myrmosinae and Pseudophotopsidinae have Palaearctic origins. The greatest<br />

39


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

diversity <strong>of</strong> the Mutillidae occurs in the Ancient Mediterranean Region (AMR) - 464 species<br />

and 47 genera, including 12 endemic and 18 unique genera. Among the subregions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

AMR, the Mutillidae are most abundant in the Mediterranean subregion (198 species, 34<br />

genera) and Irano-Turanian superprovince (178 species, 31 genera) <strong>of</strong> the Sahara-Gobi<br />

subregion. The East Asian region numbers 48 species in 21 genera, including nine unique<br />

ones common with the Oriental region. Thirty eight species in 15 genera are distributed in the<br />

Boreal region, but no endemic or unique genera exist there.<br />

The cluster analysis <strong>of</strong> the distribution <strong>of</strong> 57 genera among seven Palaearctic regions shows<br />

that the branch <strong>of</strong> East Asian fauna device at first (coefficient similarity 0.36) and than the<br />

branches <strong>of</strong> Central Asian and Sahara-Sind faunas. The Mediterranean and Irano-Turanian<br />

faunas <strong>of</strong> the AMR form a stable cluster (coefficient similarity 0.71, bootstrap 84). The Boreal<br />

region and Eurasian steppe subregion <strong>of</strong> AMR have the greatest similarity (coefficient<br />

similarity 0.84, bootstrap 96). The cluster analysis <strong>of</strong> the distribution <strong>of</strong> 302 species among 24<br />

local faunas shows that the East Asian region is most distinct. The Mutillidae <strong>of</strong> the Boreal<br />

region forms a weak cluster with the Mediterranean subregion. The mutillid fauna <strong>of</strong> Georgia,<br />

Armenia, and Azerbaijan is transitional between the Mediterranean and the Irano-Turanian<br />

faunas.<br />

The greatest diversity has AMR - 464 species, 47 genera including 12 endemic and 18 unique<br />

genera. On the generic level the Palaearctic fauna is the most similar to the Oriental (31<br />

common genera) and Afrotropical (21 common genera) faunas. The mutillid fauna <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Boreal region is a less diverse and poorest. In spite <strong>of</strong> the small size <strong>of</strong> the East Asian mutillid<br />

fauna <strong>of</strong> the Palaearctic, it is closely connected with the Oriental region.<br />

____________________________________<br />

A remarkable new species <strong>of</strong> gallwasp (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae)<br />

from South Africa, placed in a new tribe<br />

Johan Liljeblad 1 *, José Luis Nieves-Aldrey 2 , George Melika 3 & Stefan Neser 4<br />

1 Swedish Species Information Centre, Swedish Agricultural University, P.O.Box 7007, SE-750 07 Uppsala,<br />

Sweden; cynips@gmail.com<br />

2 Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC), Departamento de Biodiversidad y Biología Evolutiva, C/ José<br />

Gutiérrez Abascal 2, ES-28006 Madrid, Spain; aldrey@mncn.csic.es<br />

3 Pest Diagnostic Laboratory, Plant Protection & Soil Conservation Directorate <strong>of</strong> County Vas, Ambrozy setany<br />

2, 9762 Tanakajd, Hungary; melikageorge@gmail.com<br />

4 ARC-Plant Protection Research Institute,. Private Bag X134, Pretoria, 0001, South Africa;<br />

NeserS@arc.agric.za<br />

We describe as new a species in a new genus and new tribe. Larvae and adult females <strong>of</strong> the<br />

hitherto only known generation were collected from galls on the small tree Scolopia mundii<br />

(Eckl. & Zeyh.) Warb. (Flacourticaceae). Diagnostic characters and a key to the tribes <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Cynipidae are included. With its unique South African distribution and seemingly<br />

plesiomorphic morphology, this taxon will be important for the future untangling <strong>of</strong> the early<br />

evolution <strong>of</strong> the microcynipoids.<br />

____________________________________<br />

40


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Taxonomy, systematics and biogeography <strong>of</strong> Rhopalosomatidae with special reference to<br />

macropterous forms (Hymenoptera: Vespoidea)<br />

Volker Lohrmann 1 * & Michael Ohl 2<br />

Museum für Naturkunde, Leibniz-Institut für Evolutions- und Biodiversitätsforschung an der Humboldt-<br />

Universität zu Berlin, Invalidenstraße 43, D-10115 Berlin, Germany;<br />

1 volker.lohrmann@mfn-berlin.de, 2 michael.ohl@mfn-berlin.de<br />

The family Rhopalosomatidae is still one <strong>of</strong> the least known hymenopteran groups. The oldest<br />

fossil representatives date back to the early Cretaceous. Whereas the family assignment <strong>of</strong> the<br />

known compression fossils tentatively placed in Rhopalosomatidae is rather controversial, the<br />

affinities <strong>of</strong> Eorhopalosoma from Burmese amber is fairly clear. The two amber specimens<br />

share most diagnostic features <strong>of</strong> the modern macropterous forms, such as the characteristic<br />

wing venation, the large ocelli, apical bristles on the first flagellomeres and the upcurved male<br />

parameres. Nevertheless, the presence <strong>of</strong> only one apical bristle on each basal flagellomere<br />

and a quadridentate mandible suggests that the amber fossils are intermediate between the<br />

enigmatic, brachypterous genus Olixon and the modern macropterous forms.<br />

The recent fauna <strong>of</strong> the family currently consists <strong>of</strong> four genera, and its distribution is largely<br />

limited to the subtropics and tropics in all biogeographical regions. As far as is known,<br />

members <strong>of</strong> the family are ectoparasitoids <strong>of</strong> crickets. Although the family has been quite rare<br />

in collections for a long time, the number <strong>of</strong> specimens available for study has increased<br />

rapidly in the last 30 years as a result <strong>of</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> non-selective traps and several large-scale<br />

biodiversity inventory projects. As an example, this has resulted in over 300 specimens <strong>of</strong> the<br />

rhopalosomatid genus Liosphex, a genus previously known from two species and 15<br />

specimens only. Based on the newly collected material, the genus in fact comprises at least 14<br />

species worldwide. Based on a cladistic analysis <strong>of</strong> external morphological characters, a<br />

preliminary phylogeny <strong>of</strong> the world Liosphex is proposed. The results support a sister group<br />

relationship between Liosphex and a monophyletic clade consisting <strong>of</strong> Rhopalosoma and<br />

Paniscomima. Within Liosphex, the only Asiatic species, L. trichopleurum, is probably the<br />

sister taxon to all New World species, which together form a monophyletic group.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Quantifying the Pleistocene history <strong>of</strong> the oak gall parasitoid Cecidostiba fungosa using<br />

twenty intron loci<br />

Konrad Lohse 1* , Barbara J. Sharanowski 2 & Graham N. Stone 1<br />

1 Institute <strong>of</strong> Evolutionary Biology, University <strong>of</strong> Edinburgh, King’s Buildings, West Mains Road, EH9 3JT,<br />

UK; K.R.Lohse@sms.ed.ac.uk, graham.stone@ed.ac.uk<br />

2 barb.sharanowski@gmail.com, Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, North Carolina State University, 2317 Gardner<br />

Hall, Campus Box 7613, Raleigh, NC, USA 27695<br />

The longitudinal spread <strong>of</strong> temperate organisms into refugial populations in Southern Europe<br />

is generally assumed to predate the last interglacial. However few studies have attempted to<br />

quantify this process in non-model organisms using explicit models and multilocus data. We<br />

used sequence data for 20 intron-spanning loci (12 kb per individual) to resolve the history <strong>of</strong><br />

refugial populations <strong>of</strong> a widespread western Palaearctic oak gall parasitoid Cecidostiba<br />

fungosa (Pteromalidae). Using maximum likelihood and Bayesian methods we assess<br />

alternative population tree topologies and estimate divergence times and ancestral population<br />

sizes under a model <strong>of</strong> divergence between three refugia (Middle East, Balkans and Iberia).<br />

Both methods support an ‘Out <strong>of</strong> the East’ history for C. fungosa, matching the pattern<br />

41


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

previously inferred for their gallwasp hosts. However, coalescent-based estimates <strong>of</strong> the ages<br />

<strong>of</strong> population divides are much more recent (coinciding with the Eemian interglacial) than<br />

nodal ages <strong>of</strong> single gene trees for C. fungosa and other species. Our results suggest that<br />

similar methods could be applied to multiple species to test alternative models <strong>of</strong> parasitoid<br />

assemblage evolution.<br />

____________________________________<br />

The almond seed wasp, Eurytoma amygdali Enderlein (Hymenoptera: Eurytomidae) <strong>of</strong><br />

Iran, morphological and molecular aspects<br />

Hosseinali Lotfalizadeh 1 *, Gerard Delvare 2 & Jean-Yves Rasplus 2<br />

1 Agricultural Research Centre <strong>of</strong> Azarbaijan-e-Sharghi, Department <strong>of</strong> Plant Protection, Tabriz, Iran;<br />

lotfalizadeh2001@yahoo.com<br />

2 UMR INRA CIRAD IRD AGROM. Centre de Biologie et de Gestion des Populations (CBGP), Campus<br />

<strong>International</strong> de Baillarguet, 34398 Montpellier Cedex 5, France<br />

The systematic studies <strong>of</strong> the almond seed wasp, Eurytoma amygdali Enderlein (Hymenoptera:<br />

Eurytomidae) were performed using morphological and molecular methods. Two different<br />

morphological types were identified, which appeared to be fitted with E. amygdali and E.<br />

schreineri characteristics. Two genetic markers COI and ITS2 were used. However, the<br />

molecular studies reject specific value <strong>of</strong> the second form and show two types belonged to E.<br />

amygdali.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Host manipulation by spider parasitoids <strong>of</strong> the Polysphincta group<br />

(Pimplinae, Ichneumonidae)<br />

Rikio Matsumoto<br />

Osaka Museum <strong>of</strong> Natural History, Nagai Park 1-23, Higashisumiyoshi-ku, Osaka, 546-0034, Japan;<br />

rikio@mus-nh.city.osaka.jp<br />

The Polysphincta group is a monophyletic lineage <strong>of</strong> Ephialtini <strong>of</strong> Pimplinae and comprises<br />

koinobiont ectoparasitoids <strong>of</strong> active spiders. The female wasp stings and paralyzes the host<br />

spider and lays an egg on it. The spider recovers shortly after and continues normal life. The<br />

parasitoid larva remains on the host body, consuming body fluids <strong>of</strong> the host. In some species,<br />

it is known that the host spider weaves a modified “cocoon web” <strong>of</strong> quite different structure to<br />

the normal web when the parasitoid larva reaches its penultimate instar. As the web<br />

modifications do not occur until the parasitoid reaches the penultimate instar, and the<br />

parasitoid larvae are on active hosts at this stage, the modified webs are considered to be<br />

formed by the spider under the manipulation <strong>of</strong> the parasitoid larva.<br />

Three types <strong>of</strong> host manipulation have been detected. 1) Weaving a modified web with<br />

durability: the larva <strong>of</strong> Hymenoepimecis argyraphaga induces its orb-weaving host, Leucauge<br />

argyla, to build a highly modified web with only radii and lines connecting them at the hub<br />

and lacking circular hub lines and sticky spirals, shortly before it kills the host. Similar<br />

modification in web structure <strong>of</strong> hosts has been observed for Reclinervellus spp. on Cyclosa<br />

spp., where the disappearance <strong>of</strong> most <strong>of</strong> the sticky spiral is recognized. The same kind <strong>of</strong><br />

modification was observed in Cyclosa fililineata attacked by Polysphincta janzeni. Another<br />

modification providing durability for the web is also known in a parasitoid <strong>of</strong> the linyphiid<br />

spider, Neolinyphia fusca, forming a hammock-like sheet web between twigs. The cocoon <strong>of</strong><br />

42


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Longitibia sp. is found in a modified web whose sheet is lost, and surrounded by densely and<br />

irregularly spun thick threads. 2) Weaving a modified web resistant against predators and<br />

scavengers: in the case <strong>of</strong> Brachyzapus nikkoensis, a parasitoid <strong>of</strong> Agelena limbata forming a<br />

funnel web, when the parasitoid larva is a penultimate instar, veils <strong>of</strong> very fine and dense<br />

threads covering the spider and parasitoid larva were observed in the tunnel <strong>of</strong> the funnel web.<br />

Removal <strong>of</strong> the veil indicated that penultimate instar larvae and pupae were more likely to fail<br />

to emerge in manipulated webs compared to the controls. The modified web seems resistant<br />

against predators and scavengers such as ants. 3) Arresting the growth <strong>of</strong> the host and<br />

detaining it in a more concealed site: the dome-like sheet webs <strong>of</strong> an immature Turinyphia<br />

yunohamensis, (Linyphiidae) are small and formed under leaves <strong>of</strong> the undergrowth. When<br />

the spiders mature, they move out to more exposed spaces to form larger webs. If the spider<br />

bears a larva <strong>of</strong> Zatypota sp., the growth and molt <strong>of</strong> the spider is arrested and the spider<br />

remains immature even when unattacked spiders become adults. Although reinforcement <strong>of</strong><br />

webs was not detected in this species, this action <strong>of</strong> the parasitoid on the spider seems<br />

potentially adaptive for the parasitoid, which spins a cocoon on the web, because such small<br />

hidden webs are possibly resistant to damage.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Impact <strong>of</strong> secondary-parasitoids on population density <strong>of</strong> Psyllaephagus pistaciae in<br />

pistachio plantations <strong>of</strong> Iran<br />

M. Reza Mehrnejad<br />

Pistachio Research Institute, P.O. Box 77175.435, Rafsanjan, Iran; reza_mehrnejad@hotmail.com<br />

The specific, solitary endoparasitoid, Psyllaephagus pistaciae Ferrière (Hymenoptera,<br />

Encyrtidae), is the most widely distributed biological control agent <strong>of</strong> the common pistachio<br />

psyllid, Agonoscena pistaciae Burckhardt & Lauterer (Hemiptera: Psylloidea), in Iran. The<br />

appearance <strong>of</strong> the first adult parasitoid in the field tended to coincide with the first psyllid<br />

nymphs emerging on the pistachio leaves. Thereafter, the parasitoid normally has no difficulty<br />

in finding its host, as all psyllid nymphal instars are available throughout the pistachio<br />

growing season. The parasitism rate <strong>of</strong> A. pistaciae was found low throughout spring, summer<br />

and early autumn, ranging from 1 to 5%, rising to about 11% in November, in orchards where<br />

chemical sprays were applied for pest control as usual each year. However, in orchards where<br />

no chemical was used for several years, the parasitism rate is also low from May through to<br />

September but increased to 65% in November. Of the 6159 wasps emerging from psyllids<br />

mummies, 26.6% were P. pistaciae, and the remaining 73.6% represented six species <strong>of</strong><br />

hymenopterous hyperparasitoids, Chartocerus kurdjumovi (Nikol’skaja), Marietta picta<br />

(André), Pachyneuron aphidis (Bouché), Pachyneuron muscarum (Linnaeus), Psyllaphycus<br />

diaphorinae (Hayat) and Syrphophagus aphidivorus (Mayr). Syrphophagus aphidivorus was<br />

found as the dominant secondary parasitoid for the common pistachio psyllid. The presence <strong>of</strong><br />

shared hyperparasitoids attacking both A. pistaciae and weed-infesting aphids in pistachio<br />

orchards was verified. The braconid wasp, Lysiphlebus fabarum Marshall, the parasitoid <strong>of</strong><br />

Aphis gossypii Glover and Aphis craccivora Koch present on weeds was found to be an<br />

alternative host for three major hyperparasitoids <strong>of</strong> A. pistaciae. Syrphophagus aphidivorus<br />

was the most abundant hyperparasitoid for aphids in pistachio orchards. It is widely<br />

distributed in pistachio plantation areas. The weed-infesting aphids, along with their primary<br />

parasitoid, can act as a reservoir <strong>of</strong> A. pistaciae secondary parasitoids. Therefore, parasitized<br />

aphids allow populations <strong>of</strong> secondary parasitoids to increase and consequently to apply<br />

43


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

higher pressure on P. pistaciae. Based on this information, the hyperparasitoid complex is an<br />

important factor affecting efficiency <strong>of</strong> P. pistaciae.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Towards a compendium <strong>of</strong> Hymenoptera muscles<br />

István Mikó 1* , Lars B. Vilhelmsen 2 , Gary A.P. Gibson 3 , Matt J. Yoder 1 , Katja Seltmann 1 ,<br />

Matthew A. Bertone 1 & Andrew R. Deans 1<br />

1 Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27609-7613, USA;<br />

istvan.miko@gmail.com; diapriid@gmail.com; katja_seltmann@ncsu.edu; andy_deans@ncsu.edu<br />

2 Zoological Museum, Natural History Museum <strong>of</strong> Denmark, Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100, Copenhagen,<br />

Denmark; LBVilhelmsen@snm.ku.dk<br />

3 Canadian National Collection <strong>of</strong> Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes (CNC), Agriculture & Agri-food Canada,<br />

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Gary.Gibson@agr.gov.ca<br />

General knowledge on the muscle system is crucial for understanding the functional<br />

morphology <strong>of</strong> skeletal structures. Studying muscles is therefore indispensable both for the<br />

correct interpretation <strong>of</strong> morphological characters <strong>of</strong> any level <strong>of</strong> systematic research. The<br />

knowledge <strong>of</strong> the site <strong>of</strong> attachments <strong>of</strong> skeletal muscles delivers critical information for<br />

defining numerous traditionally used anatomical structures. Providing accurate definition for<br />

anatomical structures (i.e., classes) is perhaps the principle requirement for making<br />

hypotheses on homology. The Hymenoptera muscle compendium is an account <strong>of</strong> the<br />

complete skeletomusculature <strong>of</strong> the adult Hymenoptera. The muscles described in the<br />

compendium include those <strong>of</strong> the head, thorax, abdomen. The origin and insertion sites,<br />

definition and synonymous names used in Hymenoptera are proposed. The result <strong>of</strong> the trial<br />

for aligning Hymenoptera muscles with those <strong>of</strong> Sophophora melanogaster based on function<br />

is also reported.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Biosystematics <strong>of</strong> the Cotesia flavipes species complex (Hymenoptera: Braconidae):<br />

Towards the effective control <strong>of</strong> mothborer pests in Australia<br />

K.A. Muirhead 1 , Andrew D. Austin 1* , N. Sallam 2 & S.C. Donnellan 1,3<br />

1 Australian Centre for Evolutionary Biology & Biodiversity, School <strong>of</strong> Earth & Environmental Sciences, The<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia; andy.austin@adelaide.edu.au<br />

2 BSES Limited, PO Box 122, Gordonvale, Queensland 4865, Australia<br />

3 Evolutionary Biology Unit, South Australian Museum, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia 5000,<br />

Australia<br />

The Cotesia flavipes species complex <strong>of</strong> microgastrine wasps are economically important<br />

worldwide for the biological control <strong>of</strong> lepidopteran stemborer species associated with<br />

gramineous crops. The complex currently comprises four species: C. flavipes Cameron, C.<br />

sesamiae (Cameron), C. chilonis (Matsumura) and C. nonagriae Olliff, which are<br />

morphologically very similar. The absence <strong>of</strong> clear diagnostic characters to separate the<br />

species and inaccurate identification have confounded past efforts to assess the impact <strong>of</strong><br />

specific introductions. Moreover, geographic populations exhibit variation in host-parasitoid<br />

physiological compatibility and reproductive success. In addition, the species and populations<br />

in the complex harbour different strains <strong>of</strong> polydnaviruses (PDV). These PDVs are integrated<br />

in the wasp genome and play an important role in host immune suppression and, in turn,<br />

successful parasitism and host range. Differences in PDV symbionts among populations have<br />

44


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

potentially important implications for host utilisation and, thus, the diagnosis <strong>of</strong> appropriate<br />

strains for biological control against specific host species. We have employed a multi-gene<br />

approach to investigate genetic variation among worldwide populations <strong>of</strong> the C. flavipes<br />

complex and phylogenetic congruence between wasps and their PDVs. Our results provide a<br />

framework for examining phylogenetically distinct lineages, identification <strong>of</strong> potential cryptic<br />

species, and parasitoid-host evolution and compatibility.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Molecular and morphological revision <strong>of</strong> Evania (Hymenoptera: Evaniidae) <strong>of</strong><br />

Costa Rica<br />

Patricia L. Mullins * , Barbara J. Sharanowski, István Mikó & Andrew R. Deans<br />

North Carolina State University, Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA; Plmullin@ncsu.edu,<br />

barb.sharanowski@gmail.com, istvan.miko@gmail.com, andy_deans@ncsu.edu<br />

Evaniidae are large, unique, and relatively common predators <strong>of</strong> cockroach eggs. Despite<br />

many fascinating biological attributes, such as mimicry complexes and variable oviposition<br />

behaviors, evaniids have been largely ignored by systematists and ecologists. Currently, there<br />

are only 6 described species <strong>of</strong> Evaniidae in Costa Rica. We discovered several new<br />

morphospecies <strong>of</strong> Evania in Costa Rica and have tested these concepts with novel<br />

morphological and molecular techniques. We have developed multiple new loci from protein<br />

coding genes to use as independent tests against the barcoding region <strong>of</strong> COI. We have also<br />

discovered several new internal morphological characters used to delineate species.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Global patterns <strong>of</strong> host-plant association and phylogeography in the oak gallwasps<br />

James A. Nicholls 1 *, Chang-Ti Tang 2 , Man-Miao Yang 2 , Yoshihisa Abe 3 , John D. DeMartini 4 , George<br />

Melika 5 & Graham N. Stone 1<br />

1 Institute <strong>of</strong> Evolutionary Biology, University <strong>of</strong> Edinburgh, Ashworth Labs, King’s Buildings, Edinburgh EH9<br />

3JT, UK; james.nicholls@ed.ac.uk, graham.stone@ed.ac.uk<br />

2 Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, National Chung Hsing University, 250 Kuo Kuang Road, Taichung 40227,<br />

Taiwan; mmyang@nchu.edu.tw, cynipidsman@gmail.com<br />

3 Graduate School <strong>of</strong> Social and Cultural Studies, Kyushu University, Ropponmatsu, Fukuoka 810-8560, Japan;<br />

y_abe@scs.kyushu-u.ac.jp<br />

4 Department <strong>of</strong> Biological Sciences, Humboldt State University , 1 Harpst St, Arcata, California 95521, USA;<br />

jdd2@humboldt.edu<br />

5 Pest Diagnostic Laboratory, Plant Protection & Soil Conservation Directorate <strong>of</strong> County Vas, Ambrozy setany<br />

2, 9762 Tanakajd, Hungary; melikageorge@gmail.com<br />

Oak gallwasps (Cynipidae: Cynipini) represent a major radiation <strong>of</strong> herbivorous insects<br />

associated with oaks (genus Quercus) and their near relatives in the family Fagaceae.<br />

Information on the origins and patterns <strong>of</strong> species radiation within these gall inducing insects<br />

and their host plants provides insight into general questions relating to the co-evolutionary<br />

interactions controlling host shifts and co-radiations among herbivores and their host plants.<br />

Previous work on Western Palaearctic members <strong>of</strong> this wasp group highlighted the strong coevolutionary<br />

links between gallwasps and their host plants imposed by gall induction, with<br />

very few shifts between the two host oak sections present in this area. Here we test whether<br />

such extreme host-plant conservatism holds on a global scale, incorporating gallwasp taxa<br />

attacking all five major groupings within the genus Quercus, as well as species galling the<br />

related plant genera Lithocarpus, Castanopsis, Notholithocarpus, Chrysolepis and Castanea.<br />

45


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Specifically, we test whether on this global scale switching among host plant taxa is also rare.<br />

Within the Nearctic the major oak host lineages are more closely related than those occurring<br />

within the Palaearctic, with occasional hybridisation among them, so we test whether host<br />

switching within this region is more common. We also test whether deeper relationships<br />

among oak gallwasp lineages mirror the genus-level relationships <strong>of</strong> host plant lineages,<br />

supporting a hypothesis <strong>of</strong> very long-term co-radiation <strong>of</strong> these two ecologically-linked<br />

groups.<br />

Such global sampling also allows testing <strong>of</strong> the origins <strong>of</strong> this speciose insect group. Current<br />

levels <strong>of</strong> species diversity led the famous gallwasp researcher Alfred Kinsey to propose that<br />

this group originated in the Nearctic with subsequent invasion into Asia and the Western<br />

Palaearctic (the “Out <strong>of</strong> America” hypothesis). Under this scenario, we would expect basal<br />

gallwasp lineages to occur in the Nearctic, while Asian and Western Palaearctic radiations<br />

should be derived. In addition, basal gallwasp groups should be associated with Nearctic oak<br />

groups, including the endemic lineages Quercus sections Lobatae and Protobalanus and the<br />

genera Notholithocarpus and Chrysolepis, while shifts onto Palaearctic sections and genera<br />

would be secondary. In contrast, oaks and closely related Fagaceous genera appear to have<br />

originated in Asia, so if oak gallwasps have tracked the evolution <strong>of</strong> their host plants this<br />

suggests an alternative “Out <strong>of</strong> Asia” hypothesis for oak gallwasp origins. Under this<br />

hypothesis we predict that basal gallwasp lineages will be Asian and associated with the<br />

endemic Asian oak and near-oak taxa (Lithocarpus, Castanopsis, Quercus subgenus<br />

Cyclobalanopsis and section Cerris), with derived lineages occurring in both the Nearctic and<br />

Western Palaearctic.<br />

We test these hypotheses <strong>of</strong> origins and host plant associations using molecular data. We use<br />

DNA sequences from multiple genes (the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene, and two nuclear<br />

genes – the D2 region <strong>of</strong> the 28S rRNA gene and long-wavelength opsin) and Bayesian<br />

inference methods to reconstruct the phylogenetic history <strong>of</strong> the Cynipini. We then map host<br />

plant lineage and geographic region onto these phylogenies to examine phylogeographic<br />

origins and host plant associations within this group.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Taxonomy and phylogeny <strong>of</strong> inquiline oak gallwasps <strong>of</strong> Panama, with description <strong>of</strong><br />

eight new species <strong>of</strong> Synergus (Hymenoptera, Cynipidae, Synergini)<br />

José Luis Nieves-Aldrey 1 * & Enrique Medianero 2<br />

1 Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC), Dpto Biodiversidad Y Biología Evolutiva. C/José Gutiérrez<br />

Abascal 2, 28006 Madrid, Spain; aldrey@mncn.csic.es<br />

2 Programa Centroamericano de Maestría en Entomología, Vicerrectoría de Investigación y Postgrado,<br />

Universidad de Panamá, C. P. 0824; emedianero@ancon.up.ac.pa<br />

The poorly known gallwasp fauna <strong>of</strong> Panama is being inventoried and for the first time<br />

accurately sampled and studied. Knowledge <strong>of</strong> this fauna is interesting because it takes part <strong>of</strong><br />

the southernmost distribution <strong>of</strong> the Quercus-associated Cynipidae in the Americas. In the<br />

frame <strong>of</strong> this project a taxonomical and phylogenetic study <strong>of</strong> the cynipid inquilines<br />

associated to oak gallwasps <strong>of</strong> Panama is here presented. The host gallwasp community<br />

sampled included sixty three gall morphotypes induced by cinipids associated with six species<br />

<strong>of</strong> Quercus, mainly Quercus salicifolia and Q. bumelioides. The inquiline fauna is composed<br />

<strong>of</strong> two genera Agastoroxenia Nieves-Aldrey & Medianero, 2010, with a single species, and<br />

Synergus including 10 species. Synergus mesoamericanus and S. nicaraguensis are firstly<br />

recorded for Panama while eight additional species are described as new. A key for the<br />

46


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

identification <strong>of</strong> the inquilines <strong>of</strong> oak gallwasps <strong>of</strong> Panama is provided as well as accurate<br />

SEM based descriptions <strong>of</strong> all the studied species.<br />

A preliminary morphological phylogenetic analysis <strong>of</strong> inquilines relationships is performed<br />

based in 14 exemplar taxa <strong>of</strong> inquiline oak gallwasps, including representatives <strong>of</strong> all the<br />

known species from Panama and three outgroups namely Synergus colombianus from<br />

Colombia, and S. ibericus and Saphonecrus lusitanicus from Europe. The morphological<br />

study results in 65 characters, 62 -- from external morphology, based on scanning electron<br />

and light microscopy images, and three from biology. Parsimony analysis indicated a well<br />

supported monophyly for the clades S. mesoamericanus+S. sp. nova and another composed by<br />

two undescribed Synergus species, while the relationships between the remaining Panamanian<br />

Synergus species are uncertain and weakly supported. The phylogenetic reconstruction found<br />

a clade <strong>of</strong> two inquilines species, provisionally identified as Synergus closer to Saphonecrus<br />

than Synergus, as well as Agastoroxenia panamensis as the sister group <strong>of</strong> the remaining<br />

Synergus species.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Contributions to the Braconidae (Hymenoptera) fauna <strong>of</strong> Turkey<br />

nanç Özgen 1 * & Ahmet Beyaraslan 2<br />

1 Department <strong>of</strong> Plant Protection, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, University <strong>of</strong> Dicle, 21280 Diyarbakır, Turkey;<br />

inancoz@hotmail.com<br />

2 Department <strong>of</strong> Biology, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Science, University <strong>of</strong> Trakya, Edirne, Turkey<br />

This study was carried out to determine the species <strong>of</strong> Braconidae found in vineyard, pistachio<br />

and almond orchards in Diyarbakır, Mardin and Siirt provinces in 2006-2009. In the study, the<br />

specimens were caught using light trap in pistachio and almond orchards and sweepnet in<br />

vineyards. The total <strong>of</strong> 16 species determined are Orgilus (Orgilus) punctiventris (Tobias,<br />

1976), Phanerotoma (Phanerotoma) leucobasis (Kriechbaumer, 1894), Phanerotoma<br />

(Bracotritoma) parva (Kokujev, 1903), Homolobus (Apatia) truncator (Say, 1829), Meteorus<br />

rubens (Nees, 1811), Bracon (Lucobracon) erraticus (Wesmael, 1838), Bracon (Hablobrcon)<br />

breviradiatus (Tobias, 1957), Macrocentrus collaris (Spinola, 1808), Heterospilus tadzhicus<br />

(Belokobly, 1983), Hormius moniliatus (Nees, 1811), Chelonus (Microchelonus) flavipalpis<br />

(Szépligeti), Mirax rufilabris (Haliday), Chelonus sp., Dorytosoma sp, Spathius sp.and Rogas<br />

sp. Eight species are first records for the Turkish fauna. These species are O. punctiventris, P.<br />

leucobasis, P. parva, H. truncator, B. breviradiatus, H. tadzhicus, H. moniliatus ve C.<br />

(Microchelonus) flavipalpis.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Daring the impossible - a phylogenomic 2000 species approach to<br />

Hymenoptera phylogeny<br />

Ralph S. Peters 1 *, Benjamin Meyer 1 , Lars Krogmann 2 , Janus Borner 3 , Oliver Niehuis 4 , Kai Schütte 1 &<br />

Bernhard Mis<strong>of</strong> 4<br />

1 Zoologisches Museum Hamburg, Martin-Luther-King-Platz 3, 20146 Hamburg, Germany;<br />

ralph.peters@uni-hamburg.de.<br />

2 Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart, Rosenstein 1, 70191 Stuttgart, Germany.<br />

3 Zoologisches Institut der Universität Hamburg, Martin-Luther-King-Platz 3, 20146 Hamburg, Germany.<br />

4 Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany.<br />

47


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Countless molecular data <strong>of</strong> Hymenoptera species have been gathered over the last years,<br />

constantly growing in size and number. Our knowledge on Hymenoptera phylogeny is<br />

currently limited by the ability to combine these data in a fast, yet accurate and objective way.<br />

We present a novel approach to overcome this problem and to exploit what was published<br />

before and hence picture what we virtually already know. We used all molecular data <strong>of</strong><br />

Hymenoptera taxa accessible through GenBank and put them in a single analysis. Our study<br />

combines approaches to several issues on different levels:<br />

Firstly, we provide a methodical pipeline on how to acquire and prepare those enormous and<br />

variable data for the final tree reconstruction, including automatic download, orthologue<br />

search, sequence processing, quality management, alignment, partitioning, filtering<br />

ambiguous or randomly similar sites and eliminating heterogeneity.<br />

Secondly, we present the methods <strong>of</strong> tree reconstruction that can be performed with very large<br />

datasets in a reasonable time and with high accuracy. Our method <strong>of</strong> choice is tree<br />

reconstruction with a super distance matrix (SDM). The super distance matrix is obtained by<br />

combining NJtrees <strong>of</strong> single genes with optimized branch lengths. Subsequently, the<br />

phylogenetic tree is reconstructed from the matrix with a neighbour-joining algorithm. The<br />

SDM method also provides a super variance matrix that allows identification and elimination<br />

<strong>of</strong> unplaceable taxa.<br />

Thirdly, we show our results on Hymenoptera phylogeny. Open questions include systematic<br />

status and positioning <strong>of</strong> recognized superfamilies and <strong>of</strong> higher taxa, such as Aculeata,<br />

Proctotrupomorpha, and Evaniomorpha. Additionally to our contribution to understanding the<br />

origin and evolution <strong>of</strong> Hymenoptera these results allow us to point out open questions or<br />

weakly supported nodes to guide future studies in terms <strong>of</strong> taxon and marker selection.<br />

Our dataset comprises more than 300 nuclear and mitochondrial genes and some 2000<br />

Hymenoptera species from more than 70 families from all 22 superfamilies currently<br />

recognized.<br />

The Hymenoptera are exceptionally numerous and diverse in terms <strong>of</strong> life history and feeding<br />

habits, i.e. include parasitoids, predators, phytophaga, eusocial and solitary taxa, and are<br />

known to be systematically challenging. This makes them an excellent exemplar clade for our<br />

approach. However, the presented approach is designed as a general approach and can be<br />

applied to all taxa following the presented pipelines <strong>of</strong> data preparation and analysis.<br />

____________________________________<br />

The poverty <strong>of</strong> partitioned analyses and character-type chauvinism<br />

Kurt M. Pickett 1 * & James M. Carpenter 2<br />

1 Department <strong>of</strong> Biology, University <strong>of</strong> Vermont, 120A Marsh Life Science Building, 109 Carrigan Drive,<br />

Burlington, VT 05405, USA; kurt.pickett@uvm.edu<br />

2 American Museum <strong>of</strong> Natural History, NYC, USA; carpente@amnh.org<br />

Phylogenetic analyses <strong>of</strong> individual partitions <strong>of</strong> data (gene fragments, parts <strong>of</strong> the<br />

morphology, behavior, etc). sometimes give different results. This should be <strong>of</strong> no surprise,<br />

as even small amounts <strong>of</strong> data from the same partition will do the same. However, the<br />

common interpretation that is given is that morphology and molecules show fundamentally<br />

different patterns, leading researchers to simply pick the phylogeny from whichever data<br />

source they prefer, or to malign the utility <strong>of</strong> another data source entirely. Using social wasps<br />

and their close relatives as examples, we show that multiple different analyses that combine<br />

48


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

all available data support traditional views <strong>of</strong> taxonomy much more than the individual<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> partitions from any source.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Evolutionary history and phylogeography <strong>of</strong> western Mediterranean Synophrus<br />

inquiline gallwasps (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae: Synergini)<br />

Juli Pujade-Villar 1* , Caterina Rodriguez 1 , Graham N. Stone 2 , George Melika 3 , Zsolt Penzés 4, 5 , M.L.<br />

Ben Jamâa 6 , M. Ouakid 7 , Y. Adjami 7 , R. Bouhraoua 8 , F. Boukreris 8 & M.A. Arnedo 1<br />

1 Universitat de Barcelona, Facultat de Biologia, Dpt. Biologia Animal, Avda Diagonal-645, 08028-Barcelona,<br />

Spain; jpujade@ub.edu, kate.giner@gmail.com, and marnedo@ub.edu<br />

2 Institute <strong>of</strong> Evolutionary Biology, University <strong>of</strong> Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK; Graham.Stone@ed.ac.uk<br />

3 Pest Diagnostic Laboratory, Plant Protection & Soil Conservation Directorate <strong>of</strong> County Vas, Tanakajd,<br />

Hungary; melikageorge@gmail.com<br />

4 Institute <strong>of</strong> Genetics, Biological Research Centre <strong>of</strong> Hungarian Academy <strong>of</strong> Sciences, Szeged, Hungary<br />

5 Department <strong>of</strong> Ecology, Szeged University, Szeged, Hungary; penzes@bio.u-szeged.hu<br />

6 Institut National de Recherches en Génie Rural, Eaux et Forêts. BP 10. Ariana 2080, Tunisia;<br />

benjamaa.lahbib@iresa.agrinet.tn<br />

7 Badji Mokhtar Université d’Annaba, Faculté des Science, Département de Biologie, B. P. 12, Annaba, Algeria;<br />

adjamiy@yahoo.fr; ouakid@hotmail.com<br />

8 Université Abou Bekr Belkaïd, Faculté des Sciences, Département de Foresterie, BP 119 Imama, Tlemcen<br />

13000, Algeria; oumene@yahoo.fr; rtbouhraoua@yahoo.fr<br />

Unlike most Cynipidae species, the tribe Synergini develops as obligate inquilines within the<br />

galls induced by other cynipids. The genus Synophrus stands apart from other Synergini<br />

genera by its remarkable abilities to enlarge and modify the structure <strong>of</strong> host galls. Synophrus<br />

has been recently the subject <strong>of</strong> a molecular phylogenetic analysis and taxonomic revision.<br />

The sampling <strong>of</strong> the western Mediterranean populations, however, was very sparse and left<br />

many questions unanswered. Reproductive patterns in Synophrus hispanicus are <strong>of</strong> special<br />

evolutionary interest. The Iberian populations <strong>of</strong> this species seem to be parthenogenetic,<br />

while both males and females have been reported in their North African counterparts.<br />

Synophrus olvieri, also present in the western Mediterranean, shows contrasting patterns <strong>of</strong><br />

plant host association between its two disjunctive distribution areas. This species is found on<br />

Q. suber in North Africa, but it has been collected on Q. brantii and Q. libani in Iran. With<br />

the aim <strong>of</strong> providing a deeper understanding on the evolutionary history and phylogeographic<br />

patterns <strong>of</strong> S. hispanicus and S. olivieri, we are currently conducting a phylogenetic and<br />

population genetic analyses <strong>of</strong> a large sample <strong>of</strong> specimens collected along their distribution<br />

range using a combination <strong>of</strong> mitochondrial and nuclear markers. We will present preliminary<br />

results <strong>of</strong> these analyses, along with new information on hosts.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Proposed worldwide molecular survey <strong>of</strong> tephritid-parasitoid associations using fly<br />

puparia: a new approach to understanding host associations, systematics, and ecology in<br />

complex tritrophic communities<br />

Sonja Scheffer 1 , Robert A. Wharton 2 , Allen Norrbom 3 & Matthew L. Buffington 3*<br />

1 Systematic Entomology Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Beltsville, MD, USA; agromyzidsjs@gmail.com<br />

2 Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA; rawbaw2@tamu.edu<br />

3 Systematic Entomology Laboratory, USDA-ARS, NMNH, Washington, DC, USA<br />

Investigating dipteran-parasitoid interactions in complex communities is challenging. Often it<br />

is not possible to unambiguously associate a reared wasp with its fly host unless no other<br />

49


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

potential hosts are reared from the same collection. Morphological identification <strong>of</strong> large<br />

numbers <strong>of</strong> reared fly or wasp specimens is limited by the availability/willingness <strong>of</strong><br />

taxonomic specialists, and generally, in large studies, a nearly unmanageable number <strong>of</strong><br />

undescribed species are discovered. In addition, pupal mortality during the rearing process<br />

may reach 40% resulting in a tremendous loss <strong>of</strong> fly-wasp association data.<br />

We propose to use a novel molecular approach involving DNA-barcode data to<br />

unambiguously associate fruit-feeding tephritids and their parasitoids across a global<br />

framework <strong>of</strong> crop species and native plant hosts. This will be accomplished by more-or-less<br />

replicating the sampling design <strong>of</strong> Copeland, Luke, & Wharton’s (2009) multiyear tephritidparasitoid<br />

rearing project in Kenya with several modifications: 1) approximately 80% <strong>of</strong><br />

pupae emerging from fruits will be immediately preserved for DNA-barcoding <strong>of</strong> both fly<br />

DNA and, if present, parasitoid DNA, 2) adult flies and wasps will be reared from the<br />

remaining 20% <strong>of</strong> pupae, and these specimens will be DNA-barcoded in order to associate<br />

adults with pupal samples, and 3) extensive sampling over three years (years 1-3) will<br />

simultaneously take place in 10-15 tephritid-rich regions <strong>of</strong> the world, and the processing,<br />

parasitoid screening, and DNA sequencing <strong>of</strong> the thousands <strong>of</strong> samples will take place over 4<br />

years (years 2-5).<br />

All <strong>of</strong> the data from this project will be immediately, publicly, and freely available via<br />

project-specific web portals and databases that link with established systems (GenBank, BOL,<br />

EOL, etc.). DNA-barcoded adult specimens will be immediately deposited into major<br />

museum collections. Aliquots <strong>of</strong> genomic DNA from DNA-barcoded specimens (both flies<br />

and parasitoids) will be made available, upon request, to researchers for use in their research<br />

programs. We hope that all scientists with interests in tephritid-parasitoid interactions will use<br />

any portions <strong>of</strong> the data to address questions involving taxonomy, cryptic species,<br />

systematics, biocontrol, phylogeography, food webs, specialization, host-shifts, etc. The<br />

science, scope and impacts <strong>of</strong> this project are unprecedented and will usher in a new era <strong>of</strong><br />

understanding and managing complex global communities.<br />

____________________________________<br />

A preliminary study <strong>of</strong> molecular relationships within Diplolepis polita<br />

(Hymenoptera: Cynipidae)<br />

Katherine N. Schick 1 *, Daniel Potter 2 & Joseph D. Shorthouse 3<br />

1 Essig Museum <strong>of</strong> Entomology, 211 Wellman Hall, 3112, University <strong>of</strong> California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3112,<br />

USA; kaschick@berkeley.edu<br />

2 2148 Wickson Hall, University <strong>of</strong> California, One Shields Ave., Davis, CA 95616, USA; dpotter@ucdavis.edu<br />

3 Biology Department, Laurentian University, Sudbury ON P3E 2C6, Canada; jshorthouse@laurentian.ca<br />

Diplolepis polita (Ashmead, 1890) is the most geographically widespread species <strong>of</strong> the genus<br />

Diplolepis (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae) in addition to having a surprisingly broad range <strong>of</strong> host<br />

plant species. Some distinct differences in adult morphology within one <strong>of</strong> the Canadian<br />

populations further suggest that this might be a species group and not just a single widespread<br />

species. As a preliminary test <strong>of</strong> the diversity within this species (or species-group) DNA was<br />

extracted from larvae <strong>of</strong> Diplolepis polita collected from populations in localities throughout<br />

Canada, Alaska and California. Extracted DNA was then amplified via PCR to examine one<br />

nuclear gene sequence (Long-Wave Rhodopsin), a ribosomal DNA sequence (28S rDNA),<br />

and two mitochondrial gene sequences (Cytochrome Oxidase I and Cytochrome B). We<br />

50


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

discuss the usefulness <strong>of</strong> these particular gene sequences in cynipid phylogenetic analysis as<br />

well as implications for the validity <strong>of</strong> this species.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Defense in honeybees: can bees determine how much is at risk?<br />

Justin O. Schmidt<br />

Southwestern Biological Institute, 1961 W. Brichta Dr., Tucson, AZ 85745, USA; ponerine@dakotacom.net<br />

Selection pressure acts simultaneously at several levels - including at the individual level and<br />

the colony level - to minimize risks while maximizing fitness. In honeybees, defense against<br />

large predators is risky and costly, and the ultimate reward for an individual successfully<br />

defending the colony is death from loss <strong>of</strong> the stinger into the potential predator. This success<br />

is also a cost both for the individual and the colony. The benefit <strong>of</strong> successfully stinging a<br />

threatening predator is an enhanced reduction in the probability <strong>of</strong> damage to, or destruction<br />

<strong>of</strong>, the reproductive unit: in this case, the honeybee colony <strong>of</strong> 3-60 thousand individuals.<br />

Defensive failure can have the ultimate cost to both the individual and the colony <strong>of</strong> failure to<br />

pass their genes to subsequent generations (fitness = 0). Given the extreme risks and costs <strong>of</strong><br />

defensive behavior on one hand, and the potential benefit to individual and colony fitness on<br />

the other hand, individual defenders should optimally evaluate the risk-benefit ratio in<br />

executing defensive actions. The lower the potential harm level to the colony unit, the lower<br />

should be the risks taken by individuals. The opposite should apply to colonies having large<br />

potentials for harm. I hypothesize that risk <strong>of</strong> predation to a colony is proportional to the<br />

colony resources as measured by immature brood, honey, and pollen reserves, and that<br />

defending workers will be able to evaluate the risk to the colony and will tailor their defensive<br />

vigor accordingly. Data testing defensive responses <strong>of</strong> workers in colonies with little to lose<br />

and in others with much to lose will be presented and discussed.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Breaking the bonds <strong>of</strong> Gondwana – adaptive radiation <strong>of</strong> the Gondwanan pergid<br />

sawflies (Hymenoptera, Symphyta, Pergidae)<br />

Stefan Schmidt 1 * & G.H. Walter 2<br />

1 Zoologische Staatssammlung, Münchhausenstr. 21, 81247 Munich, Germany; Hymenoptera@zsm.mwn.de<br />

2 School <strong>of</strong> Biological Sciences, The University <strong>of</strong> Queensland, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia;<br />

g.walter@uq.edu.au<br />

The Pergidae show a Gondwanan distribution with the majority <strong>of</strong> species occurring in South<br />

America and Australia. They are the dominant sawfly family in Australia and one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

major families in the Neotropics. In Australia, three <strong>of</strong> the eight pergid subfamilies are<br />

associated exclusively with eucalypts and related Myrtaceae. These plants are characterised<br />

by high concentrations <strong>of</strong> potentially toxic essential oils (e.g. 1,8-cineole) and phytophagous<br />

insects that feed on them have developed specific mechanisms to deal with these oils. The two<br />

subfamilies Perginae and Pterygophorinae use different mechanisms to deal with the same<br />

toxic components in their respective host plants. Larvae <strong>of</strong> the Perginae have the inner surface<br />

<strong>of</strong> their mandibles equipped with s<strong>of</strong>t brush-like structures for separating leaf oils from<br />

nutritive plant matter. Oil that, despite the filter mechanism, does reach the midgut is<br />

metabolised to hydroxycineole. The related Pterygophorinae also feed mainly on oil-rich<br />

Myrtaceae, but they do not sequester the oil and lack morphological structures on their<br />

mandibles. Pterygophorine larvae rely solely on chemical detoxification <strong>of</strong> the relevant plant<br />

51


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

compounds. Both the Perginae and Pterygophorinae are, like their eucalypt host plants,<br />

endemic to Australasia. We assume that adaptive radiation <strong>of</strong> Australian sawflies that are<br />

attached to oil-rich Myrtaceae is closely associated with the aridification <strong>of</strong> the Australian<br />

continent and the adaptive radiation <strong>of</strong> the eucalypts and their allies during the Mid-Cenozoic.<br />

A phylogeny <strong>of</strong> the Pergidae based on morphological and molecular characters provides the<br />

basis for examining questions relating to the timing, specific environmental circumstances<br />

and preadaptations associated with this transition.<br />

____________________________________<br />

An introduction to gall formation<br />

Karsten Schönrogge<br />

Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford, OX10 8BB, UK; ksc@ceh.ac.uk<br />

The formation <strong>of</strong> insect galls on plants is one <strong>of</strong> the most fascinating, yet least understood<br />

examples <strong>of</strong> interspecies communication and manipulation. It is wide spread and many insect<br />

families evolved the ability to induce galls. Cynipid galls excel in the complexity <strong>of</strong> tissues<br />

and structures their galls display and one might expect the signaling to reflect this complexity.<br />

While the fundamental gall formation process is still unknown I will provide a short summary<br />

<strong>of</strong> past work on process and symptoms as an introduction to current work described in the<br />

following talk.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Ophion (Ichneumonidae) <strong>of</strong> western Canada: molecules, morphology and species<br />

delimitation in a taxonomically challenging genus<br />

Marla D. Schwarzfeld* & Felix A.H. Sperling<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Biological Sciences, University <strong>of</strong> Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada;<br />

marla.schwarzfeld@ualberta.ca; felix.sperling@ualberta.ca<br />

Ophion is a genus <strong>of</strong> large nocturnal Ichneumonidae in the subfamily Ophioninae. Whereas<br />

the Ophioninae are generally more diverse in the tropics, Ophion is most diverse in temperate<br />

regions, with an estimated 50 Nearctic species. Most species are internal parasitoids <strong>of</strong><br />

medium to large-sized Lepidoptera larvae, especially Noctuidae. They are frequently<br />

collected at light traps, and are common in most habitat types. However despite their<br />

abundance, ease <strong>of</strong> collection and conspicuous size, the Nearctic Ophion remain very little<br />

studied. Only twelve species have been described, and most records are from eastern North<br />

America. Ophion are difficult to distinguish morphologically and have a great deal <strong>of</strong><br />

intraspecific variability. Such species are <strong>of</strong>ten inaccurately or incompletely resolved with<br />

morphological analysis alone, and are thus well-suited to the use <strong>of</strong> molecular techniques. I<br />

am conducting a taxonomic study <strong>of</strong> Canadian Ophion, with an emphasis on western Canada,<br />

using a combined morphological and molecular approach. For the molecular analysis, I am<br />

sequencing both mitochondrial (COI) and nuclear (ITS2) regions. I have found that both <strong>of</strong><br />

these regions are highly variable and informative within the genus, with sequence divergences<br />

<strong>of</strong> up to 14%. For the morphological analysis I am using characters that have been found to<br />

be informative in Ophioninae in other geographic regions, as well attempting to discover<br />

reliable characters that have not previously been examined. I will also be conducting a<br />

52


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

morphometric analysis <strong>of</strong> wing venation, as a further tool to distinguish species. Preliminary<br />

results and implications <strong>of</strong> these analyses will be discussed.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Building the Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology through exploration <strong>of</strong> the Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Hymenoptera Research<br />

Katja Seltmann* 1 , Matthew A. Bertone 2 , Matthew J. Yoder 3 , István Mikó 4 , Elizabeth S. Macleod 5,<br />

Andrew Ernst 6 & Andrew R. Deans 7<br />

North Carolina State University, Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA<br />

1 katja_seltmann@ncsu.edu, 2 matthew.bertone@gmail.com, 3 diapriid@gmail.com, 4 istvan.miko@gmail.com,<br />

5 elizabethscottmacleod@gmail.com, 6 ernsthausen@gmail.com, 7 andy_deans@ncsu.edu<br />

The Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology (HAO) project aims to capture the complex lexica used<br />

to describe hymenoptera anatomy. Our core data are extracted from the corpus <strong>of</strong> published<br />

works, particularly descriptions <strong>of</strong> new taxa. We reviewed the Journal <strong>of</strong> Hymenoptera<br />

Research (JHR) to extract new labels and ontological classes, explored the completeness <strong>of</strong><br />

the present version <strong>of</strong> the HAO, and reflected upon community language trends. Three<br />

hundred and fifty three (353) Journal <strong>of</strong> Hymenoptera Research articles were parsed, accessed<br />

through the Biodiversity Heritage Library and vetted against the present ontology. New labels<br />

(2121) were collected during this process including about 650 adjectives used to qualify<br />

morphological features. Language trends were revealed in the process, showing the<br />

occurrence <strong>of</strong> anatomical labels used in the literature, possibly reflecting the character<br />

systems and qualifiers we most <strong>of</strong>ten use to describe novel taxa. Additionally the novel<br />

s<strong>of</strong>tware used for text extraction is reviewed, outlining possible improvements and useful<br />

tools resulting from this effort.<br />

____________________________________<br />

A salute to the ensign wasps: molecular phylogenetics <strong>of</strong> Evaniidae<br />

Barbara J. Sharanowski 1* & Andrew R. Deans 2<br />

North Carolina State University, Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA<br />

1 barb.sharanowski@gmail.com 2 andy_deans@ncsu.edu<br />

Generic relationships among Evaniidae have been largely ambiguous in previous molecular<br />

analyses. Additionally, the phylogenetic relationships among members <strong>of</strong> Evanioidea and<br />

their relative position within Hymenoptera have never been satisfactorily resolved. Here, we<br />

examine phylogenetic relationships among genera <strong>of</strong> Evaniidae, as well as the position <strong>of</strong> the<br />

family within Evanioidea, using molecular data. We also make inferences regarding the<br />

phylogenetic position <strong>of</strong> Evanioidea relative to other superfamilies within the order. We<br />

present a robust, well-supported phylogeny <strong>of</strong> Evaniidae utilizing multiple molecular markers,<br />

several new to hymenopteran research. Furthermore we hypothesize evolutionary pathways<br />

concerning host usage and body size within Evaniidae, based on phylogenetic patterns.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Morphology and molecules, the first comprehensive, total evidence, phylogenetic<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> the Hymenoptera<br />

Michael J. Sharkey 1 *, James M. Carpenter 2 , Lars Vilhelmsen 3 , John Heraty 4 , Fredrik Ronquist 5 ,<br />

Andrew R. Deans 6 , Ashley P.G. Dowling 7 , David Hawks 4 , Susanne Schulmeister 2 & Ward C.<br />

Wheeler 2<br />

53


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

1 Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, University <strong>of</strong> Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 40546, USA; msharkey@uky.edu<br />

2 Division <strong>of</strong> Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum <strong>of</strong> Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street,<br />

New York, NY, 10024, USA<br />

3 Zoological Museum, University <strong>of</strong> Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100, Denmark<br />

4 Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, University <strong>of</strong> California, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA<br />

5 Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, Swedish Museum <strong>of</strong> Natural History, PO Box 50007, SE-10405 Stockholm,<br />

Sweden<br />

6 Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695 USA<br />

7 Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, University <strong>of</strong> Arkansas, Fayetteville, AK, 72701 USA<br />

The first comprehensive analysis <strong>of</strong> higher-level phylogeny <strong>of</strong> the order Hymenoptera is<br />

presented. The analysis includes representatives <strong>of</strong> all extant superfamilies, scored for 392<br />

morphological characters, and sequence data for four loci (18S, 28S, COI and Ef1).<br />

Including three outgroup exemplars, 100 terminals were analyzed. Relationships within<br />

Apocrita are resolved. Well supported relationships include: Orussidae is sister to Apocrita;<br />

Evanioidea is monophyletic; Aculeata is sister to Evanioidea; Proctotrupomorpha is<br />

monophyletic; Ichneumonoidea is the sister-group <strong>of</strong> Proctotrupomorpha; Platygastroidea is<br />

sister to Cynipoidea, and together they are sister to the remaining Proctotrupomorpha;<br />

Proctotrupoidea s.s. is monophyletic; Mymarommatoidea is the sister-group <strong>of</strong> Chalcidoidea;<br />

Mymarommatoidea + Chalcidoidea + Diaprioidea is monophyletic. Weakly supported<br />

relationships include: Stephanoidea is sister to the remaining Apocrita; Ceraphronoidea is<br />

sister to Megalyroidea, which together form the sister-group <strong>of</strong> (Trigonaloidea (Aculeata +<br />

Evanioidea)); Diaprioidea is monophyletic; Xiphydriidae is sister to Orussidae + Apocrita.<br />

Symphytan relationships are well resolved as follows: (Xyeloidea (Pamphilioidea<br />

(Tenthredidoidea (Cephoidea (Siricoidea (Xiphydrioidea (Orussoidea + Apocrita))))))).<br />

____________________________________<br />

Biology <strong>of</strong> some parasitoids <strong>of</strong> Apoda limacodes (Lepidoptera: Limacodidae) in Europe<br />

Mark R. Shaw<br />

National Museums <strong>of</strong> Scotland, Edinburgh, UK; markshaw@xenarcha.com<br />

The isolated family Limacodidae is represented in Europe by very few species, <strong>of</strong> which only<br />

two are widespread. The larger <strong>of</strong> these, Apoda limacodes, is regularly parasitised by five<br />

species <strong>of</strong> larval parasitoids. The biologies <strong>of</strong> the three most extreme specialists, one species<br />

each in the Braconidae: Rogadinae genera Rogas and Triraphis and the Ichneumonidae:<br />

Tryphoninae genus Sphinctus, are outlined.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Structural colours in Hymenoptera wings<br />

Ekaterina Shevtsova* & Christer Hansson*<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Biology, Zoology, Lund University, Sweden; Ekaterina.Shevtsova@cob.lu.se,<br />

Christer.Hansson@cob.lu.se<br />

Compared to the colourful wings in butterflies wings in Hymenoptera are usually regarded as<br />

colourless. Typically monographs on Hymenoptera describe the wings as transparent or with<br />

pigmented patterns in different shades <strong>of</strong> brown, to black, but without any mention <strong>of</strong> more<br />

colourful tints. However, small Hymenoptera ( 3 mm) in particular actually display a<br />

multitude <strong>of</strong> colours on their wings, if viewed properly. These colours are distributed in a<br />

non-random pattern, and are frequently taxon-specific. We call this pattern WIP − Wing<br />

54


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Interference Pattern, and it is the result <strong>of</strong> thin film interference. The reflected patterns appear<br />

strong in live specimens and are perfectly preserved also in hundreds <strong>of</strong> years old dry museum<br />

specimens.<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> the 17.000 species <strong>of</strong> butterflies can be distinguished by their wing colours alone. Our<br />

preliminary evaluation <strong>of</strong> WIP suggests that the same is the case for several groups <strong>of</strong><br />

Hymenoptera. Especially in groups including small species with wing discs devoid <strong>of</strong> veins,<br />

e.g. the Chalcidoidea, the WIP could become a powerful tool for classification, species<br />

recognition and behavioural studies.<br />

A Hymenoptera wing is composed <strong>of</strong> a single compressed double layer <strong>of</strong> transparent chitin,<br />

ideal for two-beam thin film interference, with beams reflecting from the upper and lower<br />

surfaces <strong>of</strong> the membrane respectively. The colour patterns are non-iridescent – dioptrically<br />

stabilized and reinforced by membrane corrugations, chaetotaxy, venation and pigmentation.<br />

These patterns reflect uneven thickness <strong>of</strong> the wing membrane, and if calibrated against a<br />

colour scale, the WIP colours can be used to calculate the thickness <strong>of</strong> different parts <strong>of</strong> the<br />

wing.<br />

Membrane thicknesses, formation <strong>of</strong> membrane corrugations, chaetotaxy, all <strong>of</strong> which affect<br />

the WIP, are controlled genetically. Exactly how and by which genes this regulation occur<br />

remains to be established. However, comparing to investigations in Diptera where wing<br />

pigment patterns have been demonstrated to be formed and controlled by a set <strong>of</strong><br />

spatiotemporal on/<strong>of</strong>f switches for particular loci, similar regulating mechanisms are likely to<br />

be present in Hymenoptera.<br />

The reflected colour sequence, which excludes red, fits the colour-vision in insects, strongly<br />

suggesting their biological significance for visual signalling. We therefore find it highly<br />

unlikely that the colourful WIP palette is merely an optical effect without biological<br />

significance. The production <strong>of</strong> WIPs is a highly cost-effective way to create visual signals.<br />

Unlike in the Lepidoptera, where colour patterns are made from scales − i.e. additional<br />

structures that cost energy to produce − the colour patterns in Hymenoptera do not need extra<br />

structures for their creation, and thus do not consume extra energy beyond, occasionally, the<br />

cost <strong>of</strong> pigment formation. Species-specific WIPs produced energy-efficiently may add a lot<br />

to e.g. speciation events through species recognition systems driven by visual pre-mating<br />

activities. Hymenoptera is a very successful insect group with very high species diversity. The<br />

majority <strong>of</strong> species are small, having the ideal size to display WIPs. All these things<br />

considered the WIP could be an important factor for the outstanding success <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Hymenoptera.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Oak Provenances on Trial: the distribution <strong>of</strong> gall forming wasps at an experimental<br />

oak plantation in Northwest France<br />

Frazer Sinclair 1,2* , Karsten Schönrogge 1 , Graham N. Stone 2 & Stephen Cavers 3<br />

1 Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford, OX10 8BB, UK; FRNC@ceh.ac.uk<br />

2 University <strong>of</strong> Edinburgh, UK<br />

3 Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Edinburgh, UK<br />

Recent climate change predictions suggest that by 2050, much <strong>of</strong> southern Britain will<br />

become unfavourable for native genotypes <strong>of</strong> several broadleaved tree species currently<br />

favoured in commercial forestry. A possible management strategy is to source seeds from<br />

sites in Europe where trees are currently adapted to the climatic conditions predicted for the<br />

55


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

UK. However, work in the field <strong>of</strong> community genetics suggests that tree genotype can<br />

dramatically influence associated communities, and thus, the large-scale planting <strong>of</strong> nonnative<br />

tree genotypes in the UK could have consequences for associated biodiversity. If<br />

communities are locally adapted to native tree genotypes then introduced genotypes should<br />

have a negative influence. If however communities are adaptable, then a combination <strong>of</strong><br />

native and non-native genotypes may represent a broader niche and the influence could be<br />

positive. In this study, the influence <strong>of</strong> non-native tree genotypes is investigated using a<br />

model system <strong>of</strong> oak trees (Quercus petraea) and herbivorous gall wasps (Hymenoptera:<br />

Cynipidae) at an experimental provenance trial in Northwest France. Oaks are an important<br />

source <strong>of</strong> commercial timber in Europe, and they support the largest diversity <strong>of</strong> herbivorous<br />

insects <strong>of</strong> any European tree. At the provenance trial, the local populations <strong>of</strong> gallwasps are<br />

exposed to oaks from over 100 European populations (provenances). It is predicted that if<br />

these gallwasps are adapted to local oaks, then they will be most abundant on those<br />

provenances who are most genetically similar to, or whose phenotype most closely matches<br />

that <strong>of</strong> the local oak population. In spring and autumn 2008 and 2009, trees from 20<br />

provenances were surveyed for gallwasps and the data were analysed in relation to host-tree<br />

provenance and host-tree phenotype. Initial results indicate that oak provenance dramatically<br />

influences the abundance <strong>of</strong> gallwasps, and that gallwasps are generally most abundant on<br />

provenances that are geographically close to the trial site. This supports the prediction that<br />

gallwasps are locally adapted to tree phenotypes/genotypes, and that introduced genotypes<br />

would have a negative influence on native communities. Ongoing work aims to address the<br />

further question <strong>of</strong> how host-tree provenance can influence the associations between<br />

gallwasps and their parasitoid natural enemies.<br />

____________________________________<br />

An inordinate fondness for parasitoid wasps:<br />

DNA barcoding data from a global array <strong>of</strong> projects<br />

M. Alex Smith 1 , Jose L. Fernández-Triana 1* , Kees van Achterberg 2 , Henri Goulet 3 , Winnie Hallwachs 4<br />

Jan Hrcek 5 John T. Huber 3 , Daniel H. Janzen 4 , Scott Miller 6 , Donald L.J. Quicke 7 , Josephine<br />

Rodriguez 8 , Michael J. Sharkey 9 , Darren Ward 10 , James B. Whitfield 11 , Alejandro Zaldivar-Riverón 12<br />

& Paul D.N. Hebert 1<br />

1 Biodiversity Institute <strong>of</strong> Ontario, University <strong>of</strong> Guelph, Canada; salex@uoguelph.ca, jftriana@uoguelph.ca,<br />

phebert@uoguelph.ca<br />

2 Department <strong>of</strong> Terrestrial Zoology, NCB Naturalis, the Netherlands; achterberg@naturalis.nnm.nl<br />

3 Canadian National Collection <strong>of</strong> Insects, Canada; Henri.Goulet@agr.gc.ca, John.Huber@agr.gc.ca<br />

4 Department <strong>of</strong> Biology, University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania, United States; whallwac@sas.upenn.edu,<br />

djanzen@sas.upenn.edu<br />

5 Institute <strong>of</strong> Entomology, Biology Centre ASCR, Czech Republic; janhrcek@gmail.com<br />

6 Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, Smithsonian, United States; MillerS@si.edu<br />

7 Faculty <strong>of</strong> Natural Sciences, Imperial College, United Kingdom; d.quicke@imperial.ac.uk<br />

8 National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, University <strong>of</strong> California, United States;<br />

rodriguez@nceas.ucsb.edu<br />

9 Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, University <strong>of</strong> Kentucky, United States, msharkey@uky.edu<br />

10 Landcare Research, New Zealand; WardDA@landcareresearch.co.nz<br />

11 Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, University <strong>of</strong> Illinois, United States;jwhitfie@life.illinois.edu.<br />

12 Instituto de Biología, Universidad Autónoma de México; azaldivar@ibiologia.unam.mx<br />

Parasitoid wasps are the largest group within Hymenoptera, comprising perhaps 10 % <strong>of</strong> the<br />

terrestrial eukaryote life. Most <strong>of</strong> its species are undescribed and there are considerable<br />

taxonomic difficulties and practical limitations in dealing with this enormous diversity. Here<br />

we present an overview <strong>of</strong> DNA barcoding projects on parasitoid Hymenoptera (mostly<br />

56


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Ichneumonoidea and Chalcidoidea) that are underway based on material from the Arabian<br />

Peninsula (Oman, UAE, Yemen), Canada (Arctic and Sub-Arctic), Democratic Republic <strong>of</strong><br />

Congo, Madagascar, Meso-America (Area de Conservación Guanacaste, Costa Rica, and<br />

Mexico), Papua New Guinea, Sweden, Thailand, United States, and New Zealand. Vouchers<br />

specimens from which DNA extracts were obtained are deposited in the authors’ institutions<br />

(listed above).<br />

For every project we summarize results, including the cumulative number <strong>of</strong> species as<br />

defined by DNA barcoding. The species richness revealed in most <strong>of</strong> the projects was greater<br />

than expected, even for areas thought to contain low diversity. We tested the results <strong>of</strong><br />

barcoding against traditional taxonomic data such as morphology, ecology and biology in<br />

several projects (especially Microgastrinae from Costa Rica and Canada; Orthocentrinae and<br />

Alysiinae from Churchill) and found that the results from both approaches are similar in more<br />

than 90 % <strong>of</strong> cases, except that barcoding reveals groups <strong>of</strong> unexpected species “hiding”<br />

within morphologically-defined species.<br />

We conclude that DNA barcoding can provide a rapid and accurate overview <strong>of</strong> species<br />

richness within parasitoid Hymenoptera. The results are most robust when integrated with<br />

morphological and ecological data; however, barcode data alone will make a significant<br />

contribution to our understanding <strong>of</strong> this group.<br />

____________________________________<br />

What do we know about Chrysis ignita (Hymenoptera: Chrysididae)?<br />

Villu Soon<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Zoology, Institute <strong>of</strong> Ecology and Earth Sciences, University <strong>of</strong> Tartu, Vanemuise 46, Tartu<br />

51014, Estonia; villu.soon@ut.ee<br />

Chrysididae is a cosmopolitan Hymenoptera family that includes about 3000 named species.<br />

The largest genus in the family, Chrysis Linnaeus is also the type genus for the family.<br />

Chrysis is divided into 70 species groups, <strong>of</strong> which the largest is the C. ignita species group,<br />

which includes C. ignita Linnaeus, 1758, the type species for the genus and the best studied<br />

species in the family. From numerous published sources we know that its distribution covers<br />

most <strong>of</strong> the Palearctic region from Macaronesian islands in the west to Japanese islands in the<br />

East. The life cycle <strong>of</strong> C. ignita is relatively well documented: it is one <strong>of</strong> only eleven cuckoo<br />

wasp species for which the mature larvae have been described, and even its oogenesis has<br />

been studied. The ecology <strong>of</strong> C. ignita is also well documented with the first identification <strong>of</strong><br />

its hosts published in 1869. Currently more than 20 host species have been documented for<br />

this cuckoo wasp, suggesting that the species is not very host specific.<br />

Despite its overall homogeneous morphology, C. ignita is known to exhibit considerable<br />

variation in minor morphological details. This has led to the establishment <strong>of</strong> numerous<br />

names, which are treated as synonyms, forms, varieties, subspecies or even separate species.<br />

The usage <strong>of</strong> these names varies from author to author, with the most conservative authors<br />

treating more than 30 names as synonymous with ignita. Since treatment <strong>of</strong> the C. ignita<br />

species group is so variable I aimed to delimit each <strong>of</strong> the taxa involved. Because<br />

morphological methods have been only partially successful, I focused on molecular methods<br />

and used mitochondrial DNA sequences for reconstructing the phylogeny <strong>of</strong> the European<br />

taxa within the group.<br />

The results <strong>of</strong> my study demonstrated that many <strong>of</strong> the names <strong>of</strong>ten treated as synonyms <strong>of</strong> C.<br />

ignita in fact represent separate species. Furthermore, there appeared to be undescribed<br />

57


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

cryptic species among the taxa usually grouped together into C. ignita. Therefore, the<br />

portrayal <strong>of</strong> C. ignita as a widespread variable species with wide host selection must be<br />

reconsidered. In this light, reliable understanding about its distribution, morphology and<br />

ecology becomes very limited since most published data cannot be associated with C. ignita<br />

sensu stricto. Indeed, the wide distribution area <strong>of</strong> the species is questionable, and I have only<br />

confirmed its occurrence in Europe, where it has actually become rare in recent years.<br />

Similarly, most, if not all, published host-parasite relationships <strong>of</strong> C. ignita must be<br />

considered as unconfirmed. Moreover, we cannot now be sure whether described details about<br />

the oogenesis and larval morphology <strong>of</strong> C. ignita could be associated with C. ignita sensu<br />

stricto.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Phylogeny and systematics <strong>of</strong> the tribe Meteorini (Braconidae)<br />

Julia Stigenberg<br />

Stockholm University and Swedish Museum <strong>of</strong> Natural History, Stockholm, Sweden; Julia.stigenberg@nrm.se<br />

Parasitic wasps comprise a sizable portion <strong>of</strong> the animal diversity that remains to be<br />

described. Even the species that have names <strong>of</strong>ten remain very poorly known. In Sweden,<br />

parasitic wasps comprise roughly a quarter <strong>of</strong> the animal species for which the information is<br />

so scant that the Swedish populations cannot be judged according to the IUCN red-listing<br />

criteria (Gärdenfors 2000).<br />

The Braconidae are one <strong>of</strong> the most diverse families <strong>of</strong> parasitic wasps. They develop as<br />

parasites <strong>of</strong> a wide range <strong>of</strong> insects and form an important component <strong>of</strong> most terrestrial food<br />

webs. The world fauna is estimated at 40 000 species (Gaston 1991), and the Swedish fauna<br />

may hold as many as 2 000 species (roughly 1 200 currently known). In terms <strong>of</strong> species<br />

richness, braconids are second only to the Ichneumonidae among families <strong>of</strong> animals. There is<br />

about 30 subfamilies <strong>of</strong> Braconidae, most <strong>of</strong> which occur in Sweden. Our research will focus<br />

on the Euphorinae, one <strong>of</strong> the most difficult and species-rich <strong>of</strong> the subfamilies. It is<br />

characterized by great diversity in host association accompanied by a similarly large<br />

morphological diversity. While most braconid subfamilies parasitize on a single host insect<br />

order, euphorines attack many: Orthoptera, Hemiptera, Psocoptera, Neuroptera, Coleoptera,<br />

Lepidoptera and Hymenoptera (Chen & van Achterberg 1997, Huddleston 1980, Shaw 1985).<br />

Many euphorines also attack adult insects, a trait that is extremely rare among the parasitic<br />

Hymenoptera. Outside the Euphorinae, adult parasitism is only found in the Aphidiinae and<br />

Neoneurinae among braconids. The Aphidiinae are entirely restricted to parasitism <strong>of</strong> aphids<br />

(Shaw & Huddleston, 1991) and the Neoneurinae attack and develop in the abdomen <strong>of</strong> adult<br />

formicine ants (Poinar 2004). Thus, the Euphorinae are unique in attacking a broad range <strong>of</strong><br />

adult insects.<br />

In recent work (still unpublished), I have used a combined morphological and molecular<br />

approach to study the systematics <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> the tribes, the Meteorini (by some authors<br />

recognized as a separate subfamily). About 178 specimens from 43 species have been<br />

sequenced. Previously, 35 species <strong>of</strong> the tribe Meteorini were recorded from Sweden. We<br />

have been able to add at least ten new species and four synonyms that will be presented as<br />

taxonomical changes. The user friendly key now includes almost 60 species from all <strong>of</strong><br />

Europe with diagnostic descriptions. The phylogenetic analysis also revealed at several<br />

cryptic species and an interesting relation amongst the Meteorini. Especially the genera Zele<br />

58


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

seems to be included within the genera Meteorus rendering it paraphyletic. The host<br />

preference also shows interesting evolutionary steps.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Phylogeny and DNA barcoding <strong>of</strong> inquiline oak gallwasps (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae) <strong>of</strong><br />

the Western Palaearctic<br />

Graham N. Stone 1* , George Melika 2 , Zoltán Ács 2 , Richard Challis 1,3 , Péter Bihari 4 , Mark Blaxter 1 ,<br />

Alexander Hayward 1,5 , György Csóka 6 , Zsolt Pénzes 4,7 , Juli Pujade-Villar 8 , José-Luis Nieves-Aldrey 9<br />

& Karsten Schönrogge 10<br />

1 Institute <strong>of</strong> Evolutionary Biology, University <strong>of</strong> Edinburgh, Ashworth Laboratories, The King’s Buildings,<br />

West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, UK; graham.stone@ed.ac.uk<br />

2 Pest Diagnostic Laboratory, Plant Protection and Soil Conservation Service <strong>of</strong> County Vas, Ambrozy setany 2,<br />

Tanakajd 9762, Hungary<br />

3 Department <strong>of</strong> Biology (Area 11), University <strong>of</strong> York, Heslington, York YO10 5YW, UK; rjc509@york.ac.uk<br />

4 Biological Research Centre <strong>of</strong> Hungarian Academy <strong>of</strong> Sciences, Institute <strong>of</strong> Genetics, Temesvári krt 62,<br />

Szeged, 6723 Hungary<br />

5 Oxford University Department <strong>of</strong> Zoology, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PS UK;<br />

alexander.hayward@zoo.ox.ac.uk<br />

6 Hungarian Forest Research Institute, Mátrafüred Research Station, 3232 Mátrafüred, Hungary;<br />

csokagy@erti.hu<br />

7 University <strong>of</strong> Szeged, Department <strong>of</strong> Ecology, Szeged, Hungray; penzes@bio.u-szeged.hu<br />

8 Universitat de Barcelona, Facultat de Biologia, Departament de Biologia Animal, Avda. Diagonal 645, E-<br />

08028 Barcelona, Spain; pujade@porthos.bio.ub.es<br />

9 Dept. de Biodiversidad, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC), José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, 28006<br />

Madrid, Spain; aldrey@mncn.csic.es<br />

10 Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, CEH Wallingford, Maclean Building, Benson Lane, Wallingford, OX10<br />

8BB, UK; ksc@ceh.ac.uk<br />

We examine phylogenetic relationships within the Synergus complex <strong>of</strong> herbivorous inquiline<br />

gallwasps (Hymenoptera; Cynipidae; Synergini) associated with cynipid host galls on oak, a<br />

biologically diverse group whose genus-level morphological taxonomy has long been<br />

considered stable but whose species level taxonomy is problematic. We incorporate data for<br />

over 80% <strong>of</strong> recognised Western Palaearctic species in 5 morphology-based genera<br />

(Ceroptres, Saphonecrus, Synergus, Synophrus, Ufo), comprising sequence for two<br />

mitochondrial loci (coxI, cytb) and one nuclear locus (28S D2). In particular, we assess the<br />

evidence for monophyly <strong>of</strong> two long-established, morphology-defined sections within the<br />

genus Synergus that differ in a range <strong>of</strong> biological traits. To aid analyses <strong>of</strong> ecological<br />

interactions within oak cynipid communities, we also consider the utility <strong>of</strong> cytochrome<br />

oxidase I (coxI) DNA barcodes in the oak inquilines. In this assessment, we do not assume<br />

that species are delineated at a single threshold value <strong>of</strong> sequence divergence for a single<br />

gene, but examine concordance in the composition <strong>of</strong> molecular operational Taxonomic units<br />

(MOTUs) across a range <strong>of</strong> sequence divergences in each gene and across genes. We also<br />

assess the impact <strong>of</strong> sampling effort on MOTU stability.<br />

Phylogenetic reconstructions for all three loci support monophyly for Synergus and<br />

Synophrus, but reject monophyly for Saphonecrus and for the two sections within Synergus.<br />

The suites <strong>of</strong> traits associated with the two sections <strong>of</strong> the genus Synergus are thus<br />

homoplasious. All three loci also reject monophyly for three Synergus species (S. hayneanus,<br />

S. pallipes, S. umbraculus). Sequences for each locus identify robust MOTUs that are largely<br />

concordant across loci for a range <strong>of</strong> cut-<strong>of</strong>f values. Though many MOTU’s correspond to<br />

recognised Linnean species, there is significant, multigene disagreement between groupings<br />

supported by morphology and sequence data, with both allocation <strong>of</strong> different morphospecies<br />

59


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

to the same MOTU and allocation <strong>of</strong> the same morphospecies to multiple MOTUs, regardless<br />

<strong>of</strong> cut<strong>of</strong>f value. Our results imply that while DNA barcoding has considerable utility within<br />

this group, morphology-based identification needs major revision at both genus and species<br />

levels. Further, lifehistory traits currently attributed to single morphospecies probably<br />

confound attributes <strong>of</strong> multiple lineages. Revealing patterns <strong>of</strong> character state evolution in<br />

Synergus requires collection <strong>of</strong> new host association and life history data explicitly linked to<br />

DNA barcode data for the specimens concerned.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Molecular evolution <strong>of</strong> the subfamily Telenominae (Hymenoptera: Platygastridae)<br />

Charuwat Taekul 1 *, Norman F. Johnson 2 & Alejandro A. Valerio 3<br />

1 Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, The Ohio State University, 1315 Kinnear Road, Columbus, Ohio 43212, USA;<br />

taekul.1@osu.edu<br />

2 Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, The Ohio State University, 1315 Kinnear Road, Columbus, Ohio 43212, USA;<br />

johnson.2@osu.edu<br />

3 Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, The Ohio State University, 1315 Kinnear Road, Columbus, Ohio 43212, USA;<br />

avalerio_13@hotmail.com<br />

The subfamily Telenominae is a cosmopolitan taxon with more than 870 described species.<br />

All telenomines are egg parasitoids <strong>of</strong> insects and are considered to be the most important<br />

group within the superfamily Platygastroidea in biological control for agriculture. A<br />

preliminary phylogenetic reconstruction was performed examining 6 genera <strong>of</strong> telenomines,<br />

including 3 species groups <strong>of</strong> the genus Trissolcus and 8 species groups within the genus<br />

Telenomus. The total number <strong>of</strong> in group taxa is more than 70 species from several localities<br />

around the world. Phylogenetic reconstruction was performed using Maximum Parsimony,<br />

Maximum Likelihood and Bayesian approaches, all <strong>of</strong> which were executed using three<br />

molecular markers: the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I and the 28S and 18S rRNA. The<br />

monophyly <strong>of</strong> the subfamily and its primary constituent genera and species groups are tested.<br />

The results set the stage for more in-depth analysis <strong>of</strong> these taxa; the formal classification will<br />

require significant revision. This work is part <strong>of</strong> the ongoing Platygastroidea Planetary<br />

Biodiversity Inventory.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Oviposition behaviour and infanticide by Zatypota albicoxa (Hymenoptera,<br />

Ichneumonidae), an ectoparasitoid <strong>of</strong> a theridiid house spider<br />

Keizo Takasuka¹* & Rikio Matsumoto 2<br />

¹ Entomological Laboratory, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Ehime University, Matsuyama, Ehime 790-8566, Japan;<br />

ichneumonidae@gmail.com<br />

2 Osaka Museum <strong>of</strong> Natural History, Osaka, Japan<br />

Zatypota albicoxa (Walker) <strong>of</strong> the Polysphincta-group (Pimplinae, Ephialtini) is a koinobiont<br />

ectoparasitoid <strong>of</strong> a common house spider, Parasteatoda tepidariorum (Koch) (Araneae,<br />

Theridiidae) in Japan. The web <strong>of</strong> P. tepidariorum, called an irregular, three dimensional web,<br />

is composed <strong>of</strong> a non-sticky frame threads and more or less vertical gumfoot threads bearing<br />

tiny sticky masses near the distal end. Preys <strong>of</strong> the spider such as ants are entangled with the<br />

sticky mass when passing under the web and lifted up by the spider.<br />

The female wasp has evolved two modes <strong>of</strong> oviposition behaviour as an adaptation to the host<br />

spider hidden in such complex webs. In one, the wasp hangs on one <strong>of</strong> the vertical gumfoot<br />

60


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

threads between a host spider and gumfoot, pulling the thread with its fore leg until the spider<br />

lifts it up or hangs motionlessly on the mid height <strong>of</strong> the web until the spider approaches<br />

(ambush-style). In the other mode, the wasp climbs the frame threads to gain access to the<br />

host spider directly (climbing-style). One <strong>of</strong> the wasps exhibiting ambush style under<br />

laboratory conditions, lay on back on the floor and grasped one <strong>of</strong> the vertical gumfoot<br />

threads with her legs touching the sticky mass directly. Any strategies succeed in paralyzation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the spider but the female wasps do not flutter inside the irregular, three dimensional webs.<br />

As soon as paralyzation, the wasp rubbed the spider body with its ovipositor and tip <strong>of</strong><br />

metasoma repeatedly for about ten minutes and finally laid an egg at the base <strong>of</strong> spider’s<br />

abdomen. Throughout this process, the wasp remained hanging from the web by its hind tarsal<br />

claws and grasped the spider’s abdomen with its fore and mid legs. The paralyzed spider<br />

recovered about ten minutes after oviposition and went back to initial position. As female<br />

wasps emerged from larger hosts and male wasps emerged from smaller ones, the ovipositing<br />

wasp apparently assesses the size <strong>of</strong> the spider prior to oviposition and chooses whether to lay<br />

a fertilized or an unfertilized egg. If paralyzed spider bore a previously attached larva or egg<br />

<strong>of</strong> the wasp, the female wasp always removed them from the body <strong>of</strong> spider by means <strong>of</strong><br />

rubbing behaviour with its ovipositor, but the wasp did not kill them. Removal behaviour has<br />

evolved to remove the saddle so as to remove the larva because all larvae were removed by<br />

the ‘saddle’ attached to the ventral surface <strong>of</strong> the body, which plays a role in external<br />

attachment. The wasp has no way to discriminate her own progeny because she removed any<br />

pre-existing eggs, regardless <strong>of</strong> whether they were her own or others'. It is more time<br />

consuming for the female to remove medium second instar or large penultimate instar larvae<br />

than eggs because <strong>of</strong> the labor in unfastening the saddle. Removal <strong>of</strong> all previous occupants<br />

suggests that infanticide would be always advantageous, no matter how the costs to Z.<br />

albicoxa.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Phylogeny and taxonomic status <strong>of</strong> the Paridris complex<br />

Elijah Talamas 1 *, Lubomir Masner 2 & Norman F. Johnson 3<br />

1 Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, The Ohio State University, 1315 Kinnear Road, Columbus, Ohio 43212, USA;<br />

talamas.1@osu.edu<br />

2 Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, K.W. Neatby Building, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0C6, Canada;<br />

lmasner@gmail.com<br />

3 Department <strong>of</strong> Evolution, Ecology and Organismal Biology, The Ohio State University, 1315 Kinnear Road,<br />

Columbus, Ohio 43212, USA; johnson.2@osu.edu<br />

Paridris is a cosmopolitan genus <strong>of</strong> cricket egg parasitoids; its morphology indicates close<br />

relationship with three other genera, Tuora (Eastern Palearctic), Trichoteleia (Malagasy<br />

region), and Neoparidris (Australia). Trichoteleia and Tuora are revised at the species level,<br />

resulting in an order <strong>of</strong> magnitude increase <strong>of</strong> species diversity. The concepts <strong>of</strong> all four<br />

genera are examined and updated in the context <strong>of</strong> a phylogenetic analysis <strong>of</strong> morphological<br />

and molecular data.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Gallwasp diversity <strong>of</strong> Taiwan: testing the Asian Origin hypothesis for the Cynipini<br />

(Hymenoptera, Cynipidae)<br />

Chang-Ti Tang 1 *, Man-Miao Yang 1 , George Melika 2 , James A. Nicholls 3 & Graham N. Stone 3<br />

1 National Chung-Hsing University, Kuo Kuang Rd. 250, Taichung 40227, Taiwan;<br />

61


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

cynipidsman@gmail.com (for Chang-Ti Tang); mmyang@nchu.edu.tw (for Man-Miao Yang)<br />

2 Pest Diagnostic Laboratory, Plant Protection and Soil Conservation Directorate <strong>of</strong> County Vas, Ambrozy<br />

setany 2, 9762 Tanakajd, Hungary; melikageorge@gmail.com<br />

3 Institute <strong>of</strong> Cell, Animal and Population Biology, University <strong>of</strong> Edinburgh, Ashworth Laboratories, The King’s<br />

Buildings, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, UK; james.nicholls@ed.ac.uk; Graham.stone@ed.ac.uk<br />

Of the approximately 1400 known gallwasp species, the greatest richness (around 1000<br />

species in 30 genera worldwide) is found in the monophyletic tribe Cynipini, which induce<br />

galls on oaks (Quercus L.) [mainly <strong>of</strong> the subgenus Quercus] and related Fagaceae (Csóka et<br />

al. 2005). The cynipid gallwasp fauna <strong>of</strong> the Eastern Palaearctic and Oriental region is poorly<br />

known: only 34 valid species are recognised from the Eastern Palaearctic, mostly from Japan<br />

and the Russian Far East (Abe et al. 2007), and only few oak gallwasp species have yet been<br />

described or mentioned as “cynipid gallwasp” for the Oriental region. However, a hypothesis<br />

suggested that the Eastern Asia should be the cradle for origin <strong>of</strong> oak gallwasps due to the<br />

evidence on phylogeny <strong>of</strong> gallwasps, the diversity and potential hosts in Eastern Asia, and<br />

recently suggested diversifying center <strong>of</strong> oaks in Asia (Stone et al. 2009). Taiwan located at<br />

the southeast corner <strong>of</strong> Asia, belonging to Oriental region, which is highly rich in the flora <strong>of</strong><br />

Fagaceae. The family Fagaceae in subtropical Asia and Malesia represented by 4 genera<br />

which serve as hosts for oak gallwasps (Cynipini): Castanopsis (134 species; 8 species in<br />

Taiwan); Lithocarpus (=Pasania (Miq.) Oerst., usually united with Lithocarpus but in Asia<br />

remains accepted in some quarters where Lithocarpus s.l. is considered too heterogenous)<br />

(325 species; 15 species in Taiwan); Quercus L. subgenus Cyclobalanopsis (about 60 species;<br />

13 species in Taiwan) and a moderate number <strong>of</strong> species from Quercus subgenus Quercus<br />

which are represented in Taiwan by 10 species (Govaerts & Frodin 1998; Lu et al. 2006). To<br />

date, eleven gall morphotypes attributed to cynipids have been described from Taiwan (Yang<br />

& Tung 1998), though none <strong>of</strong> the gall inducers have been described. Of these gall types,<br />

three are associated with Quercus variabilis Blume, though no associations have previously<br />

been recorded for Quercus dentata Thunb.; other 7 morphotypes were found on<br />

Cyclobalanopsis and one on Lithocarpus (=Pasania) (Yang et al. 2000).<br />

Our survey so far explored a rich fauna <strong>of</strong> gallwasps. Galls on subgenera Quercus (Cerris and<br />

Quercus s.s. sections) and Cyclobalanopsis <strong>of</strong> Quercus were widely collected as well as on<br />

related host genera <strong>of</strong> Fagaceae, e.g. Castanopsis (Don) Spach and Lithocarpus (=Pasania).<br />

Up to date, we found: 12 types <strong>of</strong> unknown cynipid stem swelling-like galls on Quercus<br />

variabilis (Cerris section oaks), Q. glauca and Q. globosa (Cyclobalanopsis subgenus oaks),<br />

Castanopsis carlesii, and Lithocarpus konishii; 7 types <strong>of</strong> bud galls on Q. variabilis, Q.<br />

glauca, Q. pachyloma, L. konishii and L. glabra; 12 types <strong>of</strong> unknown leaf-galls on Q.<br />

variabilis, Q. morii, L. glabra, L. hancei, L. konishii, L. amygdalifolius; 5 types <strong>of</strong> catkin galls<br />

on L. konishii and L. glabra and one type <strong>of</strong> acorn gall on Q. variabilis.<br />

Till now only three Eastern Palaearctic species were found on Taiwan, all on Q. variabilis<br />

(Cerris section oaks): Cerroneuroterus vonkuenburgi (Dettmer), Trichagalma acutissimae<br />

(Monzen) [earlier known from Japan only] and recently a new species, Trichagalma<br />

formosana Tang et Melika, was described from Taiwan, however, as an undescribed species<br />

was known earlier from Japan also (Melika et al. 2010). The first Oriental Andricus species,<br />

Andricus formosana Tang & Melika, known to induce multilocular leaf galls on Q. dentata,<br />

was also recently described from Taiwan (Tang et al. 2009).<br />

Two new species <strong>of</strong> Neuroterus (as defined in Melika et al. 2010) recently found in Taiwan<br />

(in press) is <strong>of</strong> particular interest, since unlike all western palaearctic and nearctic Neuroterus,<br />

they induce galls not on section Quercus oaks but on Q. hypophaea (subgenus<br />

Cyclobalanopsis <strong>of</strong> Quercus), and on L. konishii, a plesiomorphic relative <strong>of</strong> Quercus within<br />

62


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

the Fagaceae (Manos et al. 2001). This species may be an early <strong>of</strong>fshoot in the diversification<br />

<strong>of</strong> Cynipini among oak sections, or another <strong>of</strong> the very rare examples <strong>of</strong> gallwasp switches<br />

between major hostplant lineages. The same possible alternatives apply to other recently<br />

discovered Taiwanese gallwasps, including a Dryocosmus galling Castanopsis carlesii (in<br />

press), and a Plagiotrochus galling Q. glauca (subgenus Cyclobalanopsis) (in press).<br />

Pleisiomorphic traits in the latter two species tentatively support their placement into<br />

Dryocosmus and Plagiotrochus, which also supports the Asian Origin hypothesis for the<br />

Cynipini.<br />

Our work attempts to associate the alternate generations <strong>of</strong> gallwasps and to clarify the<br />

species diversity <strong>of</strong> Taiwanese cynipid fauna. Establishment <strong>of</strong> thorough fauna data will<br />

permit us further test the hypothesis on the Asian origin <strong>of</strong> gallwasps.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Diversity <strong>of</strong> egg parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae, Trichogrammatidae, and<br />

Aphelinidae) <strong>of</strong> Proconiini sharpshooter leafhoppers (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae:<br />

Cicadellinae) in the New World and Oceania:<br />

recent discoveries and a glimpse into future research<br />

Serguei V. Triapitsyn<br />

Entomology Research Museum, Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, University <strong>of</strong> California, Riverside,<br />

CA, 92521, USA; serguei.triapitsyn@ucr.edu<br />

In the New World tropics and subtropics, an amazing diversity within the subgenus<br />

Cosmocomoidea <strong>of</strong> the fairyfly genus Gonatocerus (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae), most species<br />

<strong>of</strong> which are still undescribed, is attributed to the diversity and abundance <strong>of</strong> their hosts –<br />

leafhoppers from the tribes Proconiini (mostly) and Cicadellini (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae:<br />

Cicadellinae), which are commonly known as sharpshooters. The establishment <strong>of</strong> the glassywinged<br />

sharpshooter, Homalodisca vitripennis (Germar), in California, USA, in 1990s<br />

prompted active research efforts aimed at classical and neoclassical biological control <strong>of</strong> this<br />

vector <strong>of</strong> the bacterium Xylella fastidiosa using hymenopterous egg parasitoids. Proconiini is<br />

a New World group that includes mostly large, xylem-sucking leafhoppers that lay eggs in<br />

clusters and <strong>of</strong>ten cover them with brochosomes. Recently, the glassy-winged sharpshooter<br />

also established in parts <strong>of</strong> Oceania (the Hawaiian Islands, French Polynesia, and Easter<br />

Island), so egg parasitoids were identified from there as well (both native and intentionally or<br />

unintentionally introduced).<br />

Three main groups <strong>of</strong> chalcidoid egg parasitoids <strong>of</strong> Proconiini are identified: 1) Mymaridae,<br />

primarily numerous members <strong>of</strong> the ater species group <strong>of</strong> Gonatocerus (Cosmocomoidea) (45<br />

described and perhaps more than 200 undescribed species, some <strong>of</strong> which may also attack<br />

eggs <strong>of</strong> Cicadellini), and also several members (most quite rare) <strong>of</strong> Acmopolynema (1<br />

species), Anagrus (3 species), Palaeoneura (1 species), and Polynema (subgenus Doriclytus)<br />

(several undescribed species); 2) Trichogrammatidae: several species in the genera Burksiella,<br />

Ittys, Oligosita, Paracentrobia, Pseudoligosita, Ufens, and Zagella; and 3) Aphelinidae (3<br />

undetermined, likely undescribed, species <strong>of</strong> Centrodora, extremely rare except for one<br />

species in Tahiti Island, French Polynesia). Taxonomic problems related to identification <strong>of</strong><br />

these difficult groups are discussed, and their known host associations are indicated. Species<br />

composition <strong>of</strong> the egg parasitoids <strong>of</strong> Proconiini is different in various habitats: Mymaridae<br />

prefer humid areas but occur everywhere there are hosts, are dominant on trees and shrubs,<br />

rarely are host (insect or plant) specific, and their females are relatively fast searchers;<br />

Trichogrammatidae are more abundant in dry, semi-desert or desert areas, apparently are<br />

63


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

more host (especially plant) specific, are more common on grasses, and their females are slow<br />

searchers. Members <strong>of</strong> Gonatocerus (Cosmocomoidea) are by far the most common egg<br />

parasitoids <strong>of</strong> Proconiini; they are mostly solitary (one wasp per host egg) except for one<br />

Nearctic species, G. (Cosmocomoidea) fasciatus, which is a gregarious parasitoid (several<br />

wasps per host egg). Known trichogrammatid egg parasitoids <strong>of</strong> Proconiini are all gregarious.<br />

Before the 1990s, only one publication existed that mentioned egg parasitoids <strong>of</strong> the<br />

sharpshooter leafhoppers (in Georgia, USA); from 1996 till present, the author contributed to<br />

1 monograph, 27 refereed articles in scientific journals, and 37 other publications on the egg<br />

parasitoids <strong>of</strong> sharpshooters in the New World and Oceania. Possible directions <strong>of</strong> the future<br />

research are discussed.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Remediation and curation <strong>of</strong> the University <strong>of</strong> California, Riverside collections <strong>of</strong><br />

Aphelinidae and Encyrtidae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) on slides:<br />

problems and solutions<br />

Serguei V. Triapitsyn<br />

Entomology Research Museum, Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, University <strong>of</strong> California, Riverside,<br />

CA, 92521, USA; serguei.triapitsyn@ucr.edu<br />

Two unprecedented projects at the Entomology Research Museum, University <strong>of</strong> California,<br />

Riverside (UCRC) have dealt with remounting <strong>of</strong> almost 20,000 specimens on slides from<br />

water-soluble solutions in a permanent mountant (Canada balsam), in two groups that are<br />

most important for biocontrol: Aphelinidae and Encyrtidae. Most <strong>of</strong> the specimens have<br />

valuable host data and are vouchers <strong>of</strong> past biocontrol projects, more than 50% had been<br />

poorly mounted in Hoyer’s and were in various stages <strong>of</strong> decay, including numerous type<br />

specimens. Often several specimens or taxa were mounted on the same slide; other problems<br />

included poor labeling, old names, peeled <strong>of</strong>f labels, etc. UCRC has arguably the largest<br />

collection <strong>of</strong> Chalcidoidea on slides in the world, including ca. 40,000 slides <strong>of</strong><br />

Trichogrammatidae, ca. 25,000 slides <strong>of</strong> Aphelinidae, ca. 10,000 slides <strong>of</strong> Encyrtidae, and ca.<br />

10,000 slides <strong>of</strong> Mymaridae. In the course <strong>of</strong> the previous project (May 1998 - April 2002),<br />

sponsored by NSF grant DBI-9728626, the world’s largest collection <strong>of</strong> Aphytis (Aphelinidae)<br />

was curated: 7,292 specimens were remounted from Hoyer’s in Canada balsam, labeled, and<br />

databased, including 309 primary types <strong>of</strong> 51 nominal species, 2,473 secondary types, and<br />

4,626 non-type specimens <strong>of</strong> at least 70 species from more than 50 different countries. A<br />

catalog <strong>of</strong> the type material <strong>of</strong> Aphytis in UCRC was published.<br />

The UCRC has ca. 60,000 specimens <strong>of</strong> Aphelinidae (<strong>of</strong> which ca. 35,000 specimens are<br />

species <strong>of</strong> Aphytis) and, besides the specimens mounted on slides, ca. 50,000 dry-mounted<br />

Encyrtidae (stored in 100 museum drawers). More than 20,000 non-Aphytis specimens <strong>of</strong><br />

Aphelinidae were mounted in a temporary, water-soluble medium (Hoyer's) on 5,877 slides.<br />

More than 50% <strong>of</strong> these (3,874 slides) were in various stages <strong>of</strong> decay, <strong>of</strong> these the majority<br />

being completely or partially dry. Many specimens, including some types, have already been<br />

damaged. Material was mounted with an average <strong>of</strong> at least 5 specimens per slide. The scope<br />

<strong>of</strong> the current (5/1/2008 – 4/30/2011) project, sponsored by NSF grant DBI-0745496,<br />

involves remediation <strong>of</strong> at least 11,622 specimens (approximately 4,000 per year); the<br />

specimens are remounted individually, properly labeled, and databased (including<br />

georeferencing when possible, only ca. 83% <strong>of</strong> the slides have locality data). The total number<br />

<strong>of</strong> Aphelinidae other than Encarsia on slides in Hoyer’s that needed immediate remediation<br />

was 2,672, among them represented are 13 genera and at least 70 determined species. In<br />

addition, there are 5,023 slides <strong>of</strong> Encarsia in Hoyer’s (1,565 <strong>of</strong> them dry) from more than 50<br />

64


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

countries. The total number <strong>of</strong> Encyrtidae slides in Hoyer’s was 1,299 (1,202 <strong>of</strong> them, or<br />

about 90%, were completely dry); represented are 49 genera.<br />

A database <strong>of</strong> the remounted specimens is now partially available online via GBIF and<br />

Discover Life websites. Such projects require skilled, motivated personnel and good funding<br />

– they are expensive but well worth the effort.<br />

____________________________________<br />

The maritime parasitoid wasp Echthrodesis lamorali Masner (Hymenoptera,<br />

Platygastridae, Scelioninae)<br />

Simon van Noort1*, Lubomir Masner2, Ovidiu A. Popovici3, Charuwat Taekul 4 , Norman F. Johnson 4<br />

& Andrew D. Austin 5<br />

1 Division <strong>of</strong> Natural History, Iziko South African Museum, PO Box 61, Cape Town, 8000, South Africa &<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Zoology, University <strong>of</strong> Cape Town, Private Bag, Rondebosch, 7701; svannoort@iziko.org.za<br />

2 Division <strong>of</strong> Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum <strong>of</strong> Natural History & Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.<br />

Research Branch. K.W. Neatby Building, Ottawa, Ontario K1A OC6, Canada; lmasner@gmail.com<br />

3 Facultatea de Biologie, Universitatea Alexandru Ioan Cuza IASI, Bulevardul Carol I, Nr.11, 700506, IASI,<br />

Romania; popovici_alin_ovidiu@yahoo.com<br />

4 Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, The Ohio State University, 1315 Kinnear Road, Columbus, Ohio 43212, USA;<br />

johnson.2@osu.edu<br />

5 Australian Centre for Evolutionary Biology & Biodiversity, School <strong>of</strong> Earth and Environmental Sciences, The<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Adelaide, 5005, Australia; andy.austin@adelaide.edu.au<br />

The biology and behavior <strong>of</strong> Echthrodesis lamorali Masner, an endemic South African egg<br />

parasitoid <strong>of</strong> spiders adapted to a life in the marine environment is recorded for the first time.<br />

Morphological evidence supports taxonomic affinities <strong>of</strong> Echthrodesis to Opisthacantha,<br />

another aquatic adapted genus. Similarities to Baeini and Embidobiinae appear to be a result<br />

<strong>of</strong> convergent morphological adaptation. A phylogeny based on 28S, 18S and C01 gene<br />

sequences is presented. Images <strong>of</strong> behavior and <strong>of</strong> both sexes <strong>of</strong> the adult wasp are provided.<br />

Biological adaptation <strong>of</strong> this parasitoid wasp to a marine environment is discussed.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Hymenoptera <strong>of</strong> the Afrotropical region: diversity assessment and identification guide<br />

proposal<br />

Simon van Noort 1<br />

*, Connal Eardley 2<br />

& Hamish Robertson 1<br />

1 Division <strong>of</strong> Natural History, Iziko South African Museum, PO Box 61, Cape Town, 8000, South Africa &<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Zoology, University <strong>of</strong> Cape Town, Private Bag, Rondebosch, 7701; svannoort@iziko.org.za;<br />

hrobertson@iziko.org.za<br />

2 Agricultural Research Council, Private Bag X134, Queenswood, 0121, Pretoria, South Africa;<br />

EardleyC@arc.agric.za<br />

Family, generic and species richness <strong>of</strong> Afrotropical Hymenoptera is assessed and presented<br />

in a global context based on data synthesized for the web site www.waspweb.org. A concept<br />

for producing an identification guide to all genera <strong>of</strong> Afrotropical Hymenoptera in an<br />

electronic format, using interactive online keys, as well as in a printed version is presented.<br />

____________________________________<br />

65


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Presenting an on-going PhD project: aspects to consider when estimating the diversity <strong>of</strong><br />

neotropical Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera)<br />

Anu Veijalainen 1 *, Terry L. Erwin 2 , Ilari E. Sääksjärvi 3 , Niklas Wahlberg 4 , Gavin Broad 5 ,<br />

Isrrael Gómez 6 & John T. Longino 7<br />

1 University <strong>of</strong> Turku, Turku, Finland; anu.veijalainen@utu.fi<br />

2 National Museum <strong>of</strong> Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC, USA; erwint@si.edu<br />

3 University <strong>of</strong> Turku, Turku, Finland; ilari.saaksjarvi@utu.fi<br />

4 University <strong>of</strong> Turku, Turku, Finland; niklas.wahlberg@utu.fi<br />

5 Natural History Museum, London, UK; g.broad@nhm.ac.uk<br />

6 Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina, Lima, Peru, and University <strong>of</strong> Turku, Turku, Finland;<br />

isrrael.gomez@yahoo.com<br />

7 Evergreen State College, Olympia, Washington, USA; longinoj@evergreen.edu<br />

To get an in-depth picture <strong>of</strong> terrestrial community ecology, one can not ignore the<br />

biologically diverse and distinctive insect parasitoids. The parasitoid family Ichneumonidae<br />

(Hymenoptera) is possibly the largest animal family on earth, yet it is <strong>of</strong>ten regarded as<br />

having an anomalous diversity gradient (i.e. species richness decreases from temperate<br />

regions towards the tropics). Adequate data to justify this assumption, however, are badly<br />

lacking, particularly from Amazonia. Further, recent findings suggest that Ichneumonidae<br />

may actually be more diverse in the Neotropics – and especially in Amazonia – than<br />

previously imagined.<br />

Here, I present my on-going PhD project that concentrates on a number <strong>of</strong> factors that need to<br />

be considered when estimating the diversity <strong>of</strong> Neotropical Ichneumonidae: canopy vs.<br />

ground-level fauna, cryptic species (DNA barcoding), beta diversity (geographical distance<br />

and local forest types), flight phenology, elevation, and bioindicators. The large data set that I<br />

am currently studying with my supervisors and collaborators consists <strong>of</strong> samples from<br />

northern, northeastern and southern Peru, eastern Ecuador, and Guatemala. In addition to<br />

presenting an overall outlook <strong>of</strong> the project, I report the subfamily composition <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> the<br />

sites and give some preliminary results on our studies.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Past and present diversity and distribution in the parasitic wasp family Megalyridae<br />

Lars Vilhelmsen 1 *, Vincent Perrichot 2 & Scott R. Shaw 3<br />

1 Zoological Museum, Natural History Museum <strong>of</strong> Denmark, Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100, Copenhagen,<br />

Denmark; LBVilhelmsen@snm.ku.dk<br />

2 Université Rennes 1, UMR CNRS 6118 Géosciences, campus de Beaulieu bât. 15, 263 avenue du Général<br />

Leclerc, 35042 Rennes cedex, France<br />

3 U.W. Insect Museum, Department <strong>of</strong> Renewable Resources (3354), University <strong>of</strong> Wyoming, 1000 East<br />

University Avenue, Laramie, Wyoming 82071, USA<br />

The small parasitic wasp family Megalyridae comprises approx. 50 described extant species<br />

predominantly distributed in the southern hemisphere. The family has a substantial fossil<br />

record extending well back into the Mesozoic. Curiously, all described fossil taxa are<br />

restricted to the present day Northern hemisphere having no current overlap with the extant<br />

taxa. Recently, a number <strong>of</strong> new fossil genera from both the Cretaceous and early Tertiary<br />

were described in a monographic treatment <strong>of</strong> extinct Megalyridae (Perrichot 2009). To<br />

evaluate the status <strong>of</strong> the newly described fossil taxa and more stringently delimit the family,<br />

66


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

the phylogenetic relationships <strong>of</strong> extant and extinct Megalyridae are analysed at the genus<br />

level. The data set comprises seven outgroup taxa, all eight extant genera and a number <strong>of</strong><br />

extinct taxa that have been associated with Megalyridae. Included are also two genera from<br />

the Maimetshidae as well as Cretodinapsis; both are Cretaceous taxa whose affinities with the<br />

Megalyridae are uncertain. Analytical results are unstable because some <strong>of</strong> the fossil taxa<br />

have many missing entries, and Megalyridae as a clade are not strongly supported. The most<br />

stable results are produced when the maimetshid taxa and Cretodinapsis are excluded. When<br />

included, these taxa frequently fall outside crown group Megalyridae, the maimetshid taxa<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten being the sister <strong>of</strong> Orthogonalys (Trigonalidae), and Cretodinapsis sometimes being<br />

retrieved among the outgroup taxa as well. The remaining fossil taxa usually fall in two<br />

distinct clades inside crown group Megalyridae, one comprising the Cretaceous taxa and the<br />

other the Eocene taxa. The classification <strong>of</strong> Megalyridae is revised according to the results <strong>of</strong><br />

our analyses. When comparing past and present distributions <strong>of</strong> Megalyridae with the results<br />

<strong>of</strong> the phylogenetic analyses, it is evident that both extant and extinct genera radiated in the<br />

Mesozoic, and the family as a whole was much more widespread then. The present day<br />

distribution is essentially relictual, range contraction since the early Tertiary probably being<br />

caused by climate deterioration resulting in the contraction <strong>of</strong> tropical forest ranges<br />

throughout the Palaearctic.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Species diversity <strong>of</strong> neotropical tephritid fruit flies and their braconid parasitoids<br />

Robert A. Wharton 1 *, Marty Condon 2 , Sonja Scheffer 3 , Matthew Lewis 3<br />

1 Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA; rawbaw2@tamu.edu<br />

2 Department <strong>of</strong> Biology, Cornell College, Mount Vernon, IA, USA; mcondon2@gmail.com<br />

3 Systematic Entomology Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Beltsville, MD, USA; agromyzidsjs@gmail.com<br />

Plants, phytophagous insects, and their insect parasitoids form complex tritrophic interactions.<br />

Specialist herbivores, such as many <strong>of</strong> the fruit-infesting Tephritidae, are ideal groups for<br />

testing hypotheses about the generation and maintenance <strong>of</strong> biodiversity via such mechanisms<br />

as cospeciation, host tracking, and host shifts. These mechanisms may also apply to<br />

diversification <strong>of</strong> tephritid parasitoids, but there is limited evidence for this to date. Members<br />

<strong>of</strong> the neotropical tephritid genus Blepharoneura attack and develop exclusively in plants <strong>of</strong><br />

the family Cucurbitaceae. Prior work on a clade <strong>of</strong> Blepharoneura specific to two closely<br />

related cucurbit genera (Gurania and Psiguria) revealed an extraordinary diversity <strong>of</strong> 30<br />

species, only partly explained by host plant and host plant part specificity. Each<br />

Blepharoneura species develops in a specific part <strong>of</strong> these dioecious plants: either male<br />

flowers, female flowers, or seeds. These fly species in turn are attacked by members <strong>of</strong> at<br />

least three different lineages <strong>of</strong> opiine Braconidae: Utetes, Bellopius, and Thiemanastrepha.<br />

Bellopius includes 11 valid species, only two <strong>of</strong> which had host-associated data prior to our<br />

studies. These two have been reared from one or more polyphagous species <strong>of</strong> tephritid pests<br />

in the genus Anastrepha. We provide evidence that within the Blepharoneura/Gurania<br />

cucurbit system, the species <strong>of</strong> Bellopius diversify as host plant and host plant part specialists<br />

just as their tephritid hosts do.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Evolution <strong>of</strong> host use in cryptic species <strong>of</strong> aphid parasitoids<br />

James B. Woolley 1* , Keith R. Hopper 2 & John M. Heraty 3<br />

1 Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA 77843; JimWoolley@tamu.edu<br />

67


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

2 USDA-ARS-BIIR, Newark, DE, USA 19713; khopper@udel.edu<br />

3 Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, University <strong>of</strong> California, Riverside, California, USA 92521; john.heraty@ucr.edu<br />

Parasitic Hymenoptera (parasitoids) are extremely diverse and parasitize a wide variety <strong>of</strong><br />

host species. Differences in ability to use different host species may have provided strong<br />

selection for specialization, divergence, and thus speciation in parasitoids. We report here on<br />

the evolution <strong>of</strong> host specificity in a complex <strong>of</strong> cryptic species <strong>of</strong> aphid parasitoids. We<br />

address these questions: Does the pattern <strong>of</strong> host use differ among species in this complex? If<br />

so, when we map host use map onto a molecular phylogeny <strong>of</strong> the complex, is host use<br />

phylogenetically conserved, so that speciation is rarely associated with changes in host use, or<br />

are host use changes associated with cladogenesis, as expected if changes in host use have<br />

driven speciation? To answer these questions, we measured host use by six species from eight<br />

populations in the Aphelinus varipes complex (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae), mapped their host<br />

use onto a molecular phylogeny, and tested the relationship between genetic distance and<br />

distance in pattern <strong>of</strong> host use. We measured parasitism <strong>of</strong> seven aphid species in five genera<br />

and two tribes on four host plant species. The pattern <strong>of</strong> parasitism <strong>of</strong> aphid species varied<br />

greatly among parasitoid species and somewhat between parasitoid populations. For most<br />

parasitoid species, some aphid species were heavily parasitized and others were parasitized<br />

either rarely or not at all. Neither host plant species nor taxonomic proximity <strong>of</strong> aphid species<br />

delimited which aphids were parasitized. Although sister species <strong>of</strong> parasitoids showed<br />

similar parasitism <strong>of</strong> some aphid species, they showed very different parasitism <strong>of</strong> other aphid<br />

species. The differences in host use between these closely related species suggests that<br />

changes in host use may have sometimes been involved in speciation. In addition, some<br />

members <strong>of</strong> the complex appear to be specialists on particular aphid species, while others are<br />

generalists or at least have a wider host range. Understanding the evolution <strong>of</strong> host use in<br />

parasitoids, and the degree to which parasitoid species are specialized in their ability to utilize<br />

host species, are important in biological control, for example, in predicting the potential<br />

impact (or non-impact) <strong>of</strong> introduced species on non-target hosts.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Biology and morphology <strong>of</strong> immature stages <strong>of</strong> some species <strong>of</strong> Eulophidae<br />

(Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea), parasitoids associated with leafminers<br />

(Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae and Gelechiidae)<br />

Zoya Yefremova*, Andrey Mishchenko & Ekaterina Yegorenkova<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Zoology, State Pedagogical University, Ulyanovsk, Russia; eulophids@mail.ru<br />

Objects <strong>of</strong> research are two ectoparasitoids gregarious Minotetrastichus frontalis (Nees, 1834)<br />

(Tetrastichinae) and solitary Pnigalio soemius (Walker, 1839) (Eulophinae) and one<br />

endoparasitoid Chrysocharis laomedon (Walker, 1839) (Entedoninae). Species proved to be a<br />

larval-pupal parasitoid <strong>of</strong> Phyllonorycter issikii (Gracillariidae), which is associated with Tilia<br />

sp. and <strong>of</strong> Chrysoesthia sexguttella (Gelechiidae), associated with Chenopodium album L. A<br />

total number <strong>of</strong> observations were 1170. The fact the eggs <strong>of</strong> both ectoparsitoids might be laid<br />

beside host larva was documented for the first time. The biology and morphology <strong>of</strong> early<br />

larval instars are described in detail. First instar larva <strong>of</strong> ectoparasitoid with protuberances on<br />

II – IV thoracic and VI, VIII, X and XII abdominal and XIII anal segments from both sides<br />

and with long hairs are described. The larva uses these protuberances with hair for moving in<br />

the leaf mine and jumps onto the surface <strong>of</strong> the host. Second instar larva has lost the long hair<br />

on the protuberances. The larva is passive and can parasitize host larvae <strong>of</strong> the fourth-fifth<br />

instar or prepupae. Third instar larva has small protuberances with short trichoid setae that<br />

68


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

may have a sensory function. The larva is feeding on haemolymph and the s<strong>of</strong>t cuticle <strong>of</strong> the<br />

host. Fourth instar larva also has protuberances with trichoid seta. We observed active process<br />

<strong>of</strong> hystogenesis at the end <strong>of</strong> this instar. Pupa <strong>of</strong> M. frontalis and P. soemius attaches to the<br />

leaf by filament in mine <strong>of</strong> host. Four larval instars and three moults in M. frontalis and<br />

P.soemius was discovered. The total development <strong>of</strong> gregarious M. frontalis is 11.2 days and<br />

<strong>of</strong> solitary P. soemius is 20.6 days. Gregarious parasitism exhibited by brood <strong>of</strong> larvae <strong>of</strong> M.<br />

frontalis (2-5 individuals). We have observed siblicide behavior between third instar larva and<br />

fourth instar larva <strong>of</strong> P. soemius. Hyperparasitism was discovered in second instar larva <strong>of</strong> M.<br />

frontalis on pre-pupa <strong>of</strong> Pnigalio sp. inside mine <strong>of</strong> Ph. issikii. Multiparasitism is also present.<br />

Solitary endoparasitoid Chrysoharis laomedon has three larval instars and two moults. The<br />

larva <strong>of</strong> the first-third instars have segmentation are not clearly discernable visible. The larvae<br />

feed on the haemolymph. The size <strong>of</strong> the last instar is 3 times as long as the first instar. Third<br />

instar larva pupates completely free <strong>of</strong> host larva. The pupa is without filament and may be<br />

found beside the remnants <strong>of</strong> the host. Total development is 20.5 days. Hyperparasitism was<br />

not observed.<br />

M. frontalis and C.laomedon are subjected to the same environment inside the mine, with the<br />

same temperature and humidity. C. laomedon has changed from the typical behaviour <strong>of</strong><br />

endoparasitoids and its larva and pupa develops external, i.e. on the skin <strong>of</strong> the host larva.<br />

Developing inside the mine <strong>of</strong> P. issikii, ectoparsitoids and endoparasitoids have similar<br />

behaviours but a different strategy <strong>of</strong> parasitism; the first allow the host to develop, the<br />

second stop it from developing. The solitary endoparasitism that was discovered during our<br />

investigation is evolutionarily more primitive than gregarious ectoparasitism and its larval<br />

stages have a long period <strong>of</strong> development.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Four years later: the Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology,<br />

an overview and call for participation<br />

Matthew J. Yoder 1* , István Mikó 2 , Matthew A. Bertone 3 , Katja Seltmann 4 & Andrew R. Deans 5<br />

North Carolina State University, Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA;<br />

1 diapriid@gmail.com 2 istvan.miko@gmail.com 3 katja_seltmann@ncsu.edu 4 matthew.bertone@gmail.com<br />

5 andy_deans@ncsu.edu<br />

The Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology (HAO) is introduced. We overview the core data to be<br />

collected and integrated into the HAO and the justification for our approach. The existing data<br />

in the HAO includes over 3500 labels, 1500 ontological classes (tied together with over 1600<br />

logical relationships), and 950 references. Gaps in the present coverage (e.g. venation) and<br />

other complex issues (e.g. unifying references to sculpture) are overviewed. The day-to-day<br />

utility <strong>of</strong> the HAO, i.e. how our ontological data can be accessed by hymenopteran<br />

researchers, is discussed. We introduce several new mechanisms, both presently realized and<br />

planned, by which the hymenopterist community can interact with the HAO, including<br />

methods for annotating existing data and proposing new additions, integrating the HAO into<br />

taxonomic publications, and constructing data subsets for personal use.<br />

____________________________________<br />

The Yellow-Legged Hornet Vespa velutina (Hymenoptera: Vespidae): a new invader in<br />

France<br />

Takuma Yoshida 1,2 *, Quentin Romel 1 , Franck Muller 1 , Adrien Perrard 1 & Claire Villemant 1<br />

69


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

1 Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, UMR7205 MNHN-CNRS, Paris, France<br />

2 Systematic Entomology, Graduate School <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan;<br />

takuru@res.agr.hokudai.ac.jp<br />

The Yellow-Legged Asian Hornet, Vespa velutina (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) is an invasive<br />

species recently introduced in France. Within a few years, this hornet spread throughout a<br />

great part <strong>of</strong> south-west France and became rapidly famous, because <strong>of</strong> its large nests usually<br />

located in tree tops as well as its propensity to prey on honeybees in front <strong>of</strong> hives.<br />

Since the first record <strong>of</strong> this species in France in 2004, the invasion is monitored, mainly<br />

through nest recording. After six years, the hornet appears to be well acclimated to the French<br />

ecosystems, invading both natural and urbanized environments.<br />

The Yellow-Legged Asian Hornet that is originally widespread across South-east Asia, from<br />

Pakistan to China and Indonesia, presents a large range <strong>of</strong> color variations. The population<br />

introduced to France belongs to the nigrithorax form, which is distributed from Pakistan to<br />

South and East China. The most probable hypothesis <strong>of</strong> its introduction, (through importation<br />

<strong>of</strong> bonsais from East China) is being tested using genetic markers. A first predictive model<br />

using climatic data from the native and invaded areas suggests that V. velutina could<br />

acclimatize to a large part <strong>of</strong> Europe as well as various other countries around the world.<br />

The genetic diversity <strong>of</strong> the invasive population, the colony development and the predation<br />

behavior <strong>of</strong> the hornet are being studied as well as the defense <strong>of</strong> French honeybees against<br />

this new enemy. Honeybees, however, are not the only preys <strong>of</strong> this invader. A diet study<br />

based on the flesh pellet brought back to the nest by the workers revealed a very wide prey<br />

spectrum, from social Hymenoptera and flies to dead vertebrate flesh. First results showed<br />

that honeybee ratio varies among preys according to habitats, reaching about 1/3 in rural areas<br />

and up to 2/3 in urban areas. The impact <strong>of</strong> V. velutina on local biodiversity is being<br />

investigated by evaluating the biomass <strong>of</strong> preys required to feed a colony.<br />

Although its presence in France has no significant impact on public health, the Asian hornet<br />

locally significantly threatens beekeeping. The eradication <strong>of</strong> the hornet being no longer<br />

possible, effective and selective trapping methods are being developed in order to protect<br />

beehives at best.<br />

____________________________________<br />

BracBank – a specimen and taxon-based program to facilitate taxonomic research<br />

Dicky Yu 1 & Michael J. Sharkey 1*<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Kentucky, Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, S225 Agricultural Science Center North<br />

Lexington, KY, 40546-0091, USA; msharkey@uky.edu<br />

The goals <strong>of</strong> BracBank are tw<strong>of</strong>old. 1. To make specimen-based data and images available<br />

through a continuously updated taxonomic frame-work. 2. Use the data to generate<br />

descriptions, diagnoses, interactive illustrated keys, distribution maps, and nomenclatorial<br />

summaries; in short all <strong>of</strong> the elements necessary for revisionary publications. BracBank is<br />

still in development but many functionalities are now operating and colleagues are invited to<br />

use it as a platform for their taxonomic research. The system allows individuals anywhere in<br />

the world to enter and edit information while password protection prevents misuse. The<br />

taxonomic frame-work is a crucial part <strong>of</strong> the system, as it removes the need for taxonomic<br />

editing and prevents spelling errors. All 24,936 braconid names at all taxonomic levels are<br />

incorporated.<br />

____________________________________<br />

70


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

DNA barcoding the parasitic wasp subfamily Doryctinae (Braconidae) from the<br />

Chamela-Cuixmala Biosphere Reserve, Mexico<br />

Alejandro Zaldívar-Riverón 1* , De Jesús-Bonilla, V.S. 1 , Rodríguez-Pérez, A.C. 1 , Ceccarelli, F.S. 1 ,<br />

Reséndiz-Flores, A. 1 & Smith, M.A. 2<br />

1 Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, D. F., México;<br />

azaldivar@ibiologia.unam.mx<br />

2 Biodiversity Institute <strong>of</strong> Ontario, Department <strong>of</strong> Integrative Biology, University <strong>of</strong> Guelph, Ontario, Canada;<br />

salex@uoguelph.ca<br />

The Doryctinae represents one <strong>of</strong> the largest braconid subfamilies, mostly comprising<br />

idiobiont ectoparasitoids <strong>of</strong> xylophagous and bark boring Coleoptera larvae, and containing a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> speciose, morphologically heterogeneous genera. Here we show the preliminary<br />

results <strong>of</strong> an ongoing DNA barcoding study <strong>of</strong> the doryctine fauna from the Chamela-<br />

Cuixmala Biosphere Reserve in Mexico, a region mostly composed <strong>of</strong> tropical dry forest.<br />

DNA barcoding sequences from 407 specimens collected during three field trips were<br />

analysed using the general mixed Yule-coalescent (GMYC) model approach and the single<br />

threshold optimisation in order to delimit species from DNA sequences alone. Use <strong>of</strong> the<br />

above approach resulted in a total <strong>of</strong> 186 putative species that were assigned to 22 genera, 114<br />

<strong>of</strong> which belong to the highly diverse, polyphagous genus Heterospilus. Sequences <strong>of</strong> the<br />

D2-D3 domain region <strong>of</strong> the 28S nuclear rDNA gene were also obtained for all the specimens<br />

in order to confirm the species boundaries indicated by the mtDNA marker. The results<br />

obtained helped to clarify cases where the indiscriminate use <strong>of</strong> highly homoplastic<br />

morphological characters led to the erection <strong>of</strong> non-monophyletic genera. This study<br />

highlights the urgent necessity <strong>of</strong> carrying out diversity studies with molecular tools in order<br />

to accelerate the process <strong>of</strong> species discovery in megadiverse groups <strong>of</strong> hymenopterans.<br />

71


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

ABSTRACTS OF POSTERS<br />

(* = in attendance)<br />

Population dynamics <strong>of</strong> alfalfa weevil parasitoids in West Azarbaijan (Iran)<br />

Esmaeil Alizadeh 1* & Seyed Ebrahim Sadeghi 2<br />

1 Agricultural and Natural Resource Research Center <strong>of</strong> West Azerbaijan, P.O.Box:365 Urmia, Iran;<br />

ISM478@yahoo.com<br />

2 Research Institute <strong>of</strong> Forest and Ranglands, Tehran, POBox 13185-116, Iran; ebrasadeghi@gmail.com<br />

Hypera postica Gyll. (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) is one <strong>of</strong> the most important pests in West<br />

Azarbaijan province <strong>of</strong> Iran. During 2007-2008 a survey on the population dynamics <strong>of</strong><br />

natural enemies (parasitoids) <strong>of</strong> H. postica was carried out in two regions, Saadad (Chaldoran)<br />

and Shoot (Makoo). Hypera postica and other insects were swept weekly in both locations.<br />

Hundred sweepnet hits/location/sample were done in early morning, taking into account the<br />

pest behaviour. Collected insects were separated and counted and the density <strong>of</strong> H. postica<br />

larvae/sample was evaluated. An aspirator was used to collect adults <strong>of</strong> H. postica from the<br />

soil surface. Results showed, that H. postica was observed for the first time, from both,<br />

Makoo and Chaldoran, by mid-April and by mid-May, respectively. The population peaks <strong>of</strong><br />

H. postica were recorded in Makoo and Chaldoran by mid-May and mid-June, respectively.<br />

The population density <strong>of</strong> H. postica in sampled two regions was different and also showed<br />

that the environmental conditions were better in 2008 than 2007.<br />

A survey <strong>of</strong> three important parasitoids, Bathyplectes curculionis Thomson, Bathyplectes<br />

anurus Thomson andOomyzus (=Tetrasticus) incertus Ratzeburg, showed nearly the same<br />

population density for all 3 species. The highest and lowest population densities were<br />

observed for B. anurus and O. incertus, respectively. Population peaks for B. curculionis and<br />

B. anurus were recorded in Makoo for May 20 th and June 7 th , respectively. In Chaldoran,<br />

population peaks <strong>of</strong> B. curculionis and B. anurus were observed on June 20 th and June 7 th .<br />

The correlation coefficient was calculated between H. postica and B. anurus (R²=0.841).<br />

Population densities <strong>of</strong> predators in 2007 and 2008 were similar to those <strong>of</strong> parasitoids. The<br />

population density <strong>of</strong> Coccinella septempunctata was higher than <strong>of</strong> Chrysoperla carnea,<br />

both, in each <strong>of</strong> two years and each <strong>of</strong> two sampled regions.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Comparing wing shapes <strong>of</strong> the subspecies Bombus (Thoracobombus) sylvarum<br />

citrin<strong>of</strong>asciatus and Bombus (Thoracobombus) sylvarum daghestanicus (Hymenoptera:<br />

Apidae: Bombus Latreille) using landmark based geometric morphometrics<br />

Nezahat Pınar Barkan* & A.M. Aytekin<br />

Hacettepe University, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Science, Department <strong>of</strong> Biology, 06800 Beytepe, Ankara, Turkey;<br />

pinarbarkan@gmail.com<br />

Color patterns <strong>of</strong> bumble bees (Bombus (s.l.)) can be either similar or rather variable within<br />

species. The fact that different individuals within some species may show resemblance with a<br />

series <strong>of</strong> other species makes it hard to identify bumble bees according to their coat colors.<br />

This situation is regarded as a problem in bumble bees as it may lead individuals which look<br />

almost the same in color to be identified as the same species by mistake. Geometric<br />

morphometrics techniques are quite useful in analyzing shape differences. It is considered as a<br />

powerful tool in taxonomical studies in bumble bees by being advantageous compared with<br />

72


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

other methods. Thoracobombus (s.str.) is a subgenus studied under the genus Bombus and it is<br />

one <strong>of</strong> the most diverse subgenus which is characterized by 14 species in Turkey. Bombus<br />

(Thoracobombus) sylvarum traditionally has two subspecies which are ssp. citrin<strong>of</strong>asciatus<br />

and ssp. daghestanicus. While ssp. citrin<strong>of</strong>asciatus shows distribution in western Turkey, ssp.<br />

daghestanicus appears both in eastern Turkey and in the southern part <strong>of</strong> Central Anatolia.<br />

The fact that these two subspecies are quite isolated from each other in distribution and that<br />

they show different coat color patterns makes it certain that they are clear subspecies. In this<br />

study, it was aimed to show if geometric morphometrics could be successful enough to<br />

distinguish them from each other. Wing shapes <strong>of</strong> these two subspecies were examined<br />

together with the other 11 species from the same subgenus using 20 landmarks. Analyses<br />

were carried out on 133 females and 42 males collected from various localities in Turkey.<br />

Cartesian coordinates were obtained from the fore wings <strong>of</strong> the specimens. Procrustes analysis<br />

was conducted to remove non-shape variation. Then PCA and CVA were conducted to<br />

examine the distribution <strong>of</strong> all species. Differences in wing shapes were shown on<br />

deformation grids. Mean values <strong>of</strong> all the specimens were calculated and SAHN clustering<br />

was performed to obtain dissimilarity trees. According to the results, these two subspecies<br />

were found to be significantly different from each other. Their deformation grids showed<br />

almost no deformation indicating that these two subspecies are similar according to their wing<br />

shapes.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Aligning insect anatomy ontologies: identifying congruence between Hymenoptera and<br />

Diptera<br />

Matthew A. Bertone 1* , István Mikó 2 , Matthew J. Yoder 3 , Katja Seltmann 4 & Andrew R. Deans 5<br />

North Carolina State University, Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA;<br />

1 matthew.bertone@gmail.com 2 istvan.miko@gmail.com 3 diapriid@gmail.com 4 katja_seltmann@ncsu.edu<br />

5 andy_deans@ncsu.edu<br />

Ontologies represent the formalized terminology (lexicon) <strong>of</strong> a domain <strong>of</strong> interest, and the<br />

logical relationships between terms (e.g., wing is_a appendage; ocellus part_<strong>of</strong> head). While<br />

there exist many types <strong>of</strong> ontologies, anatomy ontologies are becoming an important resource<br />

for studying phenotypic variation and genetic influences on morphology within a group <strong>of</strong><br />

organisms. Thus far, insect anatomy ontologies have only been developed for Diptera,<br />

specifically the model organism genus Drosophila and the family Culicidae (mosquitoes).<br />

The Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology (HAO) is a burgeoning insect ontology aimed at<br />

describing/relating the morphology <strong>of</strong> the hyper-diverse order Hymenoptera. Here we<br />

describe and discuss the ontological similarities (exact and inferred) between the HAO, FBbt<br />

(Drosophila gross anatomy ontology) and MA (mosquito adult gross anatomy ontology). We<br />

calculate these matches using existing ontology alignment s<strong>of</strong>tware and novel matching tools,<br />

both <strong>of</strong> which are examined for their utility. Our results are persisted in the HAO database as<br />

a set <strong>of</strong> cross references which will inform future comparisons between taxa. We also<br />

compare major areas <strong>of</strong> incongruence between current insect anatomy ontologies and possible<br />

explanations for these disparities.<br />

____________________________________<br />

A new mechanical modification <strong>of</strong> an insect manipulator<br />

Peter S. Boyadzhiev*, Atanas D. Donev & Tsanko S. Gechev<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Zoology, University <strong>of</strong> Plovdiv “P. Hilendarski”, Plovdiv 4000, Bulgaria;<br />

boyadz@uni-plovdiv.bg; atdonev@yahoo.com; tsangech@uni-plovdiv.bg<br />

73


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

An improved design <strong>of</strong> stereomicroscope manipulator for observation <strong>of</strong> pinned or mounted<br />

insects is presented. The device allows movement <strong>of</strong> the observed object around three<br />

perpendicular axes in the field <strong>of</strong> vision at all magnifications <strong>of</strong> the stereomicroscope. The<br />

main improvement <strong>of</strong> this new modification is positioning <strong>of</strong> the guiding knobs for rotating<br />

around two axes next to each other, allowing faster and easier manipulation <strong>of</strong> the studied<br />

object. The device enables easily reaching a precession deviation in the intersection point <strong>of</strong><br />

axes up to 0.5 mm in the process <strong>of</strong> assembling.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Bizzare wasps on the island New Caledonia – a revision <strong>of</strong> the genus Arpactophilus<br />

(Hymenoptera: Apoidea)<br />

Laura Breitkreuz * & Michael Ohl<br />

Museum für Naturkunde, Leibniz-Institut für Evolutions- und Biodiversitätsforschung an der Humboldt-<br />

Universität zu Berlin, Invalidenstraße 43, 10115 Berlin, Germany;<br />

laura.breitkreuz@mfn-berlin.de; michael.ohl@mfn-berlin.de<br />

The genus Arpactophilus belongs in the Pemphredonini within the digger wasps<br />

(Hymenoptera: Apoidea) and occurs exclusively in the Australasian region. It contains 43<br />

described species and is morphologically highly diverse, which prompted Arnold Menke to<br />

speak <strong>of</strong> an ‘evolutionary explosion’ <strong>of</strong> Arpactophilus in that area. In the present project, I<br />

revised Arpactophilus from New Caledonia, where 17 species were currently known. I<br />

discovered 24 undescribed species, which brings the total number <strong>of</strong> Arpactophilus on New<br />

Caledonia to 41. Each species is diagnosed and described in detail. A remarkable new<br />

character is that in contrast to the majority <strong>of</strong> digger wasps, apparently including Australian<br />

species <strong>of</strong> Arpactophilus, the males <strong>of</strong> the New Caledonian Arpactophilus have 12 instead <strong>of</strong><br />

13 antennomeres.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Body weight change during the development <strong>of</strong> solitary wasp Symmorphus allobrogus<br />

(Hymenoptera: Vespidae: Eumeninae)<br />

Anna Budrien¹*, Žaneta Nevronyt¹ & Eduardas Budrys¹ , ²<br />

¹ Nature Research Centre, Akademijos 2, Vilnius LT-08412, Lithuania; ebudrys@ekoi.lt<br />

² Dept. <strong>of</strong> Zoology <strong>of</strong> Vilnius University, M.K.iurlionio 21/27, Vilnius LT-03101, Lithuania<br />

We studied the change <strong>of</strong> body weight <strong>of</strong> eumenine wasp Symmorphus allobrogus during the<br />

development from egg to imago.<br />

The brood cells for study were obtained using reed trap-nests in three localities <strong>of</strong> Lithuania in<br />

2000-2006. Newly built nests were taken from the trap-nests every 7-14 days and dissected.<br />

We weighed the provision in fresh brood cells and measured weight and head width <strong>of</strong> wasp<br />

larva in older ones. A part <strong>of</strong> the developing wasp larvae was weighed and measured<br />

repeatedly every second day until the start <strong>of</strong> cocoon formation or defecation. Prepupae were<br />

reactivated in refrigerator at +4°C. We weighed the prepupae before and after reactivation, as<br />

well as pupae and freshly emerged imagos.<br />

Larval development <strong>of</strong> S. allobrogus included 5 instars; the growth <strong>of</strong> body weight was<br />

exponential. The larvae <strong>of</strong> the 3 rd , 4 th and 5 th instars could be reliably distinguished by their<br />

head width. Male larvae <strong>of</strong> all instars had significantly smaller average head width than<br />

female larvae.<br />

74


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

On average, the female cells were provisioned with 27% larger amount <strong>of</strong> prey than male<br />

cells. However, the mean weight <strong>of</strong> fullgrown female larva was 37% larger than that <strong>of</strong> male<br />

larva. The relationship between larval body weight and weight increment per day was<br />

significantly different (Chow test), as well: female larvae <strong>of</strong> a certain weight had larger<br />

weight increment per day than male larvae. Thus, female larvae <strong>of</strong> S. allobrogus were<br />

growing faster and gaining more body weight per weight unit <strong>of</strong> consumed provision than<br />

male larvae.<br />

Relative loss <strong>of</strong> body weight <strong>of</strong> larva during spinning the cocoon and defecation was<br />

significantly higher in male than in female. In contrast, the relative loss <strong>of</strong> body weight during<br />

reactivation was significantly higher in prepupae <strong>of</strong> females than in males.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Dependence <strong>of</strong> brood cell length on nesting cavity width in xylicolous solitary wasps <strong>of</strong><br />

genera Ancistrocerus and Symmorphus (Hymenoptera: Vespidae: Eumeninae)<br />

Eduardas Budrys¹ , ²*, Anna Budrien¹ & Žaneta Nevronyt¹<br />

¹ Nature Research Centre, Akademijos 2, Vilnius LT-08412, Lithuania; ebudrys@ekoi.lt<br />

² Dept. <strong>of</strong> Zoology <strong>of</strong> Vilnius University, M.K.iurlionio 21/27, Vilnius LT-03101, Lithuania<br />

The application <strong>of</strong> trap-nests for the studies <strong>of</strong> cavity-nesting Hymenoptera eventually implies<br />

a need for immediate nest identification using its structure. Possible nest characters that may<br />

be potentially useful for the separation <strong>of</strong> closely related species are body size-dependent<br />

metrical parameters <strong>of</strong> their brood cells.<br />

We studied the dependence <strong>of</strong> brood cell length on nesting cavity width in ten cavity-nesting<br />

predatory wasp species. Five alternative hypotheses were erected and tested: a wasp adjusts<br />

the length <strong>of</strong> a brood cell depending on the width <strong>of</strong> the nesting cavity, (1) maintaining the<br />

volume <strong>of</strong> the cell more or less constant, or (2) maintaining the internal surface <strong>of</strong> the cell<br />

more or less constant, or (3) maintaining the area <strong>of</strong> the longitudinal section <strong>of</strong> the cell<br />

(product <strong>of</strong> its length and diameter) more or less constant, or (4) maintaining the perimeter <strong>of</strong><br />

the longitudinal section <strong>of</strong> the cell (or the sum <strong>of</strong> its width and length) more or less constant;<br />

or (5) length <strong>of</strong> a brood cell is defined by the body length <strong>of</strong> wasp, and it does not depend on<br />

diameter <strong>of</strong> nesting cavity. We calculated the derived parameters <strong>of</strong> brood cells needed for<br />

testing the hypotheses and, applying correlation and linear regression, assessed the degree <strong>of</strong><br />

fit <strong>of</strong> the actual data to the hypothesized dependences.<br />

The results demonstrate that most (but not all) cavity-nesting wasp species have an adaptable<br />

nesting behavior: they build shorter brood cells in wider cavities. Out <strong>of</strong> ten studied species,<br />

only two wasps (Symmorphus crassicornis and S. gracilis) seem to build brood cells <strong>of</strong><br />

random length for their brood <strong>of</strong> both sexes in nesting cavities <strong>of</strong> any suitable diameter. In the<br />

other eight species, the degree <strong>of</strong> such adaptability (quantified as a cell length – cavity width<br />

regression coefficient b) was statistically significant at least for the brood <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> sexes. The<br />

studied wasps seem to estimate and keep constant the sum or the product <strong>of</strong> length and width<br />

<strong>of</strong> a brood cell rather than its volume. This statement is supported by 13 out <strong>of</strong> 20 analyzed<br />

datasets, or by 8 out <strong>of</strong> 10 studied wasp species whose nest building behavior supports the<br />

hypotheses (3) or (4). In 3 studied wasp species, the datasets <strong>of</strong> cells with brood <strong>of</strong> different<br />

sex demonstrated dependences <strong>of</strong> cell length on nesting cavity width supporting different<br />

hypotheses. We conclude that metrical differences among brood cells <strong>of</strong> related cavity-nesting<br />

species, if present, are more likely to be found in the relation between their length and width<br />

than in their volume.<br />

____________________________________<br />

75


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Assessment <strong>of</strong> anthropogenic impact at landscape scale using trap-nesting wasp and bee<br />

community in Europe<br />

Eduardas Budrys¹ , ²* & Anna Budrien¹<br />

¹ Nature Research Centre, Akademijos 2, Vilnius LT-08412, Lithuania; ebudrys@ekoi.lt<br />

² Dept. <strong>of</strong> Zoology <strong>of</strong> Vilnius University, M.K.iurlionio 21/27, Vilnius LT-03101, Lithuania<br />

The method <strong>of</strong> trap-nests for solitary Hymenoptera is more and more <strong>of</strong>ten used for<br />

assessment <strong>of</strong> state and changes in semi-natural and agricultural habitats. The authors <strong>of</strong> this<br />

project applied trap-nests for cavity-nesting bees and wasps placed on tree trunks and old<br />

buildings in 13 countries <strong>of</strong> Europe using possibilities <strong>of</strong> field site network <strong>of</strong> the EU FP6<br />

project ALARM. The goal <strong>of</strong> the study was comparison <strong>of</strong> species composition <strong>of</strong> the trapnesting<br />

Hymenoptera communities in semi-natural and agricultural landscapes and<br />

preliminary assessment <strong>of</strong> tolerance <strong>of</strong> these wasp and bee species to the anthropogenic<br />

impact at landscape level.<br />

Results <strong>of</strong> the study demonstrate that there are no significant differences between the seminatural<br />

and agricultural landscape in the abundance and species diversity <strong>of</strong> the communities<br />

<strong>of</strong> synanthropic cavity-nesting Hymenoptera occupying trap-nests placed on buildings. In<br />

contrast, the communities <strong>of</strong> the cavity-nesting Hymenoptera occupying trap-nests placed on<br />

tree trunks demonstrated significant differences between semi-natural and agricultural<br />

landscape. For instance, abundance <strong>of</strong> cavity-nesting Pompilidae and Crabronidae was<br />

significantly higher in semi-natural landscape than in agricultural one. Share <strong>of</strong> the nest cells<br />

with inquilines and parasitoids and the number <strong>of</strong> natural enemy species per host species in a<br />

trap-nest were significantly higher in semi-natural landscape, that is, the higher trophic ranks<br />

<strong>of</strong> the trap-nesting community were more abundant and diverse in the semi-natural landscape,<br />

in comparison to the agricultural landscape.<br />

Comparing abundance <strong>of</strong> trap-nesting wasp and bee species in two landscape types, we found<br />

that some species (e.g. Dipogon subintermedius, Trypoxylon figulus, Rhopalum clavipes etc.)<br />

are significantly more <strong>of</strong>ten found in semi-natural landscape. On the other hand, a set <strong>of</strong><br />

species was significantly more abundant in the agricultural landscape with dominating early<br />

succession stage habitats (e.g. Ancistrocerus gazella, Symmorphus gracilis, Megachile<br />

centuncularis etc.). We propose a preliminary “landscape naturalness index”, based on the<br />

ratio <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> trap-nesting species related to semi-natural landscape to the number <strong>of</strong><br />

those related to agricultural landscape, for further testing and elaboration.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Hymenoptera parasitoids <strong>of</strong> immature stages <strong>of</strong> Geometridae (Lepidoptera), associated<br />

with plants <strong>of</strong> a sub-native forest in the state <strong>of</strong> São Paulo, Brazil<br />

Manoel Martins Dias Filho*, Mariana Geraldo, Angélica Maria Penteado-Dias &<br />

Andrés Fábian Herrera Flórez<br />

Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, SP, Brazil; manoelmd@ufscar.br<br />

Larvae <strong>of</strong> Geometridae (Lepidoptera) were obtained from native understorey forest,<br />

interspersed with pine, on the campus <strong>of</strong> the Federal University <strong>of</strong> São Carlos, São Paulo,<br />

Brazil. Larvae were collected weekly by beating the vegetation on entomological umbrella,<br />

from March/2007 to May/2008 and April/2009 to April/2010. In the laboratory the larvae<br />

were kept in translucent plastic containers <strong>of</strong> 250 or 500 ml and fed with leaves <strong>of</strong> their<br />

respective host plants. The pupal stage and the emergence <strong>of</strong> adult moths or parasitoids<br />

76


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

occurred in the same container where the larvae were kept. Head capsules <strong>of</strong> larvae <strong>of</strong><br />

Geometridae, parasitized larvae and cocoons <strong>of</strong> parasitoids were properly preserved, allowing<br />

later identification <strong>of</strong> the hosts and their parasitoids. We collected so far 668 Geometridae<br />

specimens (21 species), <strong>of</strong> which 105 (8 species) were parasitized. The Braconidae,<br />

Microgastrinae and Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae were the most commom parasitoids.<br />

Macaria rigidata (Geometridae) the most commonly species found, presented the largest<br />

number <strong>of</strong> Ichneumonidae parasitoid. Diradops sp. (Banchinae), Neotheronia sp. (Pimplinae)<br />

and Jomini sp. (Campopleginae) were first recorded as parasitoids respectively on the<br />

Geometridae Macaria rigidata, Oxydia sp. and Prochoerodes sp. Other information about the<br />

bionomy <strong>of</strong> the species are presented and illustrated. The material studied is deposited in<br />

collection <strong>of</strong> the Departamento de Ecologia e Biologia Evolutiva da Universidade Federal de<br />

São Carlos,São Carlos, SP, Brazil.<br />

Financial support: FAPESP (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo) CNPq<br />

(Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico), CAPES (Coordenação de<br />

Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior), INCT/ HYMPAR- Sudeste (Instituto<br />

Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia dos Hymenoptera Parasitóides da Região Sudeste<br />

Brasileira).<br />

____________________________________<br />

Parasitic wasps <strong>of</strong> the Proctotrupoidea, Platygastroidea and Ceraphronoidea in New<br />

Zealand: review and analysis<br />

John W. Early 1* , Lubomir Masner 2 & Darren F. Ward 3<br />

1 Auckland Museum, Private Bag 92018, Auckland, New Zealand; jearly@aucklandmuseum.com<br />

2 Canadian National Insect Collection, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A0C6, Canada;<br />

lmasner@gmail.com<br />

3 New Zealand Arthropod Collection, Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand;<br />

wardda@landcareresearch.co.nz<br />

We present an overview <strong>of</strong> the current state <strong>of</strong> knowledge <strong>of</strong> these three superfamilies <strong>of</strong><br />

Apocrita in New Zealand based on published records and our accumulated unpublished<br />

experience from field work and examination <strong>of</strong> material in collections. Field collections made<br />

by sweeping and pan trapping in the cool, moist, temperate forests (the dominant habitat<br />

before human colonization) abound with individuals, particularly <strong>of</strong> the families Diapriidae<br />

and Platygastridae. There are 101 named species across the three superfamilies but we<br />

estimate that there are ca 750 species awaiting description. The fauna is characterized by two<br />

distinct extremes, viz. a marked absence in NZ <strong>of</strong> large world genera on one side and a<br />

stunning speciation in several mega genera on the other. The bulk <strong>of</strong> species diversity lies in<br />

the Spilomicrini (Diapriidae: Diapriinae) and the Platygastrinae (Platygastridae). Endemism at<br />

the species level is high (>90%) but tramp species are found in all families apart from the<br />

endemic Maamingidae. Strong Gondwanan relationships are found within the Proctotrupidae,<br />

Diapriidae (Ambositrinae, Belytinae), Scelionidae (Archaeoteleia) and Platygastridae<br />

(Sceliotrachelinae) which has arisen from New Zealand’s cataclysmic geological history.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Exotic fig pollinators and associates (Chalcidoidea: Agaonidae) <strong>of</strong> Ficus trees in Europe<br />

Jose Vicente Falco-Gari 1 *, M.T. Oltra-Moscardo, F.J. Peris-Felipo & R. Jimenez-Peydro<br />

Instituto Cavanilles de Biodiversidad, Universitat de Valencia, Apartado Oficial 22085, 46071-Valencia, Spain;<br />

j.vicente.falco@uv.es<br />

77


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

The family Agaonidae, represented by 6 subfamilies and about 757 species worldwide<br />

(Bouek 1988), contains chalcidoids associated with Ficus trees. Agaoninae are strictly<br />

pollinator wasps <strong>of</strong> figs (they are a coevolution model <strong>of</strong> the mutualistic interaction between<br />

pollinator insects and plants); other subfamilies includes inquilines / gall formers <strong>of</strong> figs or<br />

gall formers <strong>of</strong> other plant parts and also parasitoids <strong>of</strong> all previous groups. The family shows<br />

a distribution specially centred in the Afrotropical, Indo-Australian and Neotropical regions.<br />

Three subfamilies and five species are known from Europe (Fauna Europea 2009):<br />

Blastophaga psenes and Eupristina verticillata (Agaoninae - pollinators <strong>of</strong> Ficus carica and<br />

Ficus microcarpa), Josephiella microcarpae and Odont<strong>of</strong>roggatia galili (Epichrysomallinae -<br />

leaf gall former and fig gall former in Ficus microcarpa) and Philotrypesis caricae<br />

(Sycoryctinae - parasitoid <strong>of</strong> B. psenes).<br />

A sampling work has been carried out on eleven species <strong>of</strong> ornamental Ficus trees in several<br />

cities <strong>of</strong> Eastern Spain and Balearic islands. Methodology combines both sweeping on the<br />

trees as collection <strong>of</strong> fig fruits. Results <strong>of</strong> this work are the record <strong>of</strong> seven species <strong>of</strong><br />

Agaonidae, three <strong>of</strong> them (Pleistodontes imperialis, Walkerella microcarpae and<br />

Philotrypesis emeryi) are new for Europe; and the stablishment <strong>of</strong> ten Agaonidae-Ficus<br />

relationships, seven are new cases for Europe and two <strong>of</strong> them (Eupristina verticillata - Ficus<br />

benjamina and Pleistodontes imperialis - Ficus elastica) are new additional cases. Other<br />

bibliographic information has been revised.<br />

This work has been supported by the Spanish Ministry <strong>of</strong> Education and Science and by<br />

European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) (Project CGL2004-02711).<br />

____________________________________<br />

Diversity <strong>of</strong> Heloridae (Proctotrupoidea) in a protected natural area from Spain<br />

Jose Vicente Falco-Gari 1 *, M.T. Oltra-Moscardo, F.J. Peris-Felipo & R. Jimenez-Peydro<br />

Instituto Cavanilles de Biodiversidad, Universitat de Valencia, Apartado Oficial 22085, 46071-Valencia, Spain;<br />

j.vicente.falco@uv.es<br />

Heloridae (Hymenoptera: Proctotrupoidea) contains twelve species worldwide, all <strong>of</strong> them<br />

included in the only one genus Helorus. The genus is represented by four species in the West<br />

Palaearctic region. Members <strong>of</strong> this family are parasitoids <strong>of</strong> larvae <strong>of</strong> Chrysopa species<br />

(Neuroptera: Chrysopidae).<br />

The four European species (H. anomalipes, H. nigripes, H. ruficornis and H. striolatus) have<br />

been collected in a sampling work with a Malaise trap carried out in the Natural Park <strong>of</strong><br />

“Tinença de Benifassa” (Valencian Community, Eastern Spain) during the three-year period<br />

2005-2007. Specific identification characters are pointed out, phenology <strong>of</strong> each species is<br />

studied, and potential chrysopid hosts for the group are suggested.<br />

This work has been supported by the Spanish Ministry <strong>of</strong> Education and Science and by<br />

European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) (Project CGL2004-02711).<br />

____________________________________<br />

Tracing the geographical origin <strong>of</strong> Eupelmus vesicularis and a molecular taxonomic<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> the Eupelmus vesicularis species-complex<br />

Lucian Fusu<br />

Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Biology, Bd. Carol I nr. 11, 700506, Iai, Romania;<br />

lucfusu@hotmail.com<br />

78


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Epelmus vesicularis (Retzius, 1783) is one <strong>of</strong> the most widespread and common Eupelmidae<br />

species in Europe. It is also present in North America, but here probably was accidentally<br />

introduced prior to the 19th century (Gibson 1990). It is also the only species <strong>of</strong> Eupelmus<br />

(Macroneura) in New Zealand (Bouek 1988), which suggests another introduction. A vast<br />

number <strong>of</strong> hosts from many insect orders are recorded in the literature for E. vesicularis.<br />

Among its more economically important hosts are the Hessian fly, Mayetiola destructor (Say)<br />

(Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) and jointworms (the larvae <strong>of</strong> Tetramesa spp., Hymenoptera:<br />

Eurytomidae), destructive pests <strong>of</strong> wheat. Another intriguing biological aspect <strong>of</strong> the species<br />

is that it reproduces by thelytokous parthenogenesis in North America but both sexes occur in<br />

Europe (Gibson 1990, Graham 1969). Because <strong>of</strong> the biological and morphological variability<br />

I suspected that more than one species might be included under what historically has been<br />

interpreted as E. vesicularis and initiated an integrated taxonomy approach to investigate this<br />

possibility. Citogenetic (Fusu 2008) morphometric and allozyme data (Fusu 2010) showed<br />

that there are two species included under the name E. vesicularis. During these studies, further<br />

evidence gathered showing that it is possible that none <strong>of</strong> the two cryptic species detected so<br />

far is the true E. vesicularis. Current work, using one nuclear (ITS2) and one mitochondrial<br />

marker (COX) aims at building a molecular phylogeny <strong>of</strong> Eupelmus vesicularis species-group<br />

in order to detect cryptic lineages and is investigating the hypothesis that New Zealand and<br />

North American populations <strong>of</strong> the E. vesiculars species complex are in fact <strong>of</strong> Palaearctic<br />

origin and represent naturalized species introduced to this areas in historic times.<br />

____________________________________<br />

The importance <strong>of</strong> morphological characters in the taxonomy <strong>of</strong> egg-parasitoids <strong>of</strong><br />

the family Trichogrammatidae (Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea)<br />

Viktor N. Fursov<br />

Schmalhausen Institute <strong>of</strong> Zoology <strong>of</strong> National Academy <strong>of</strong> Sciences <strong>of</strong> Ukraine, Kiev, Ukraine;<br />

ufensia@gmail.com<br />

The family Trichogrammatidae includes over 830 species from 83 genera which are<br />

exclusively small-sized (less 1,0 mm) egg-parasitoids <strong>of</strong> insects from 11 orders (Coleoptera,<br />

Lepidoptera, Diptera, Heteroptera, Hymenoptera, Orthoptera, Thysanoptera, Psocoptera,<br />

Neuroptera, Megaloptera, Odonata). The family Trichogrammatidae is divided into two<br />

subfamiles and four tribes: Trichogrammatinae (Trichogrammatini) and Oligositinae<br />

(Chaetostrichini, Oligositini, Paracentrobiini).<br />

The fauna <strong>of</strong> Palaearctic region consists <strong>of</strong> such genera: eleven <strong>of</strong> Trichogrammini: Asynacta<br />

Foerst., Mirufens Gir., Neocentrobia Gir., Neocentrobiella Gir., Neolathromera Ishii,<br />

Ophioneurus Ratz., Poropoea Foerst., Pterandrophysalis Now., Soikiella Now.,<br />

Trichogramma Westw., Trichogrammatoidea Gir.; one <strong>of</strong> Paracentrobiini: Paracentrobia<br />

How., six <strong>of</strong> Oligositini: Doirania Waterst., Epoligosita Gir., Megaphragma Timb., Oligosita<br />

Walk., Prestwichia Lubb., Pseudoligosita Gir., fourteen <strong>of</strong> Chaetostrichini: Aphelinoidea<br />

Gir., Bloodiella Now., Chaetostricha Walk., Chaetostrichella Gir., Lathromeris Foerst.,<br />

Lathromeroidea Gir., Lathromeromyia Gir., Monorthochaeta Blood, Tumidiclava Gir., Ufens<br />

Gir., Ufensia Gir., Uscana Gir., Xiphogramma Now., Zagella Gir.<br />

The combination <strong>of</strong> various morphological characters are used for genera and species<br />

identification <strong>of</strong> Trichogrammatidae: presence and distribution <strong>of</strong> setae on fore wings; fore<br />

wings venation; ratio <strong>of</strong> width to length <strong>of</strong> fore wings; number <strong>of</strong> setae on marginal vein;<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> large sensillae between marginal and submarginal vein; setae between linearly<br />

arranged setal tracks; presence <strong>of</strong> RS1 vein; funicular and clava segmentation; ratio and size<br />

79


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

<strong>of</strong> funicular segments; presence <strong>of</strong> placoid sensillae on funicle and clava; segmentation <strong>of</strong><br />

maxillary palps; shape and form <strong>of</strong> hind tibial spur; setae, sculpture and shape <strong>of</strong> mesoscutum<br />

and scutellum; shape and length <strong>of</strong> ovipositor; shape <strong>of</strong> metasomal tergites; and structures <strong>of</strong><br />

male genitalia.<br />

Large number <strong>of</strong> morphological structures <strong>of</strong> male genitalia are used for the identification <strong>of</strong><br />

Trichogramma species: ratio <strong>of</strong> width to length <strong>of</strong> genital capsule; constriction <strong>of</strong> genital<br />

capsule and intervorsellar process; shape <strong>of</strong> parameres; form and position <strong>of</strong> apex <strong>of</strong><br />

parameres; position <strong>of</strong> base <strong>of</strong> vorsellae and parameres; shape <strong>of</strong> vorsellae; width <strong>of</strong><br />

vorsellae; presence and shape <strong>of</strong> apical process <strong>of</strong> vorsellae; level <strong>of</strong> extension <strong>of</strong> vorsellae<br />

beyond parameres; sclerotization and separation <strong>of</strong> vorsellae; presence and shape <strong>of</strong><br />

intervorsellar process; shape <strong>of</strong> ventral ridge; presence <strong>of</strong> dorsal ridge and dorsal lamina;<br />

shape <strong>of</strong> posterior extension <strong>of</strong> dorsal lamina; shape <strong>of</strong> shoulders at base <strong>of</strong> dorsal lamina;<br />

shape and subdivision <strong>of</strong> aedeagus; ratio <strong>of</strong> aedeagus length to genital capsule length and<br />

apodemes length. The analysis <strong>of</strong> morphological characters together with a new molecular<br />

data and discovery <strong>of</strong> new biological information can greatly improve and justify current<br />

taxonomical position for many species <strong>of</strong> Trichogrammatidae.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Life-cycle <strong>of</strong> a fig wasp Blastophaga psenes L. (Hymenoptera, Agaonidae) as obligate<br />

pollinator and gall-former in Ficus carica L. (Magnoliopsida) in Crimea, Ukraine<br />

Viktor N. Fursov<br />

Schmalhausen Institute <strong>of</strong> Zoology <strong>of</strong> National Academy <strong>of</strong> Sciences <strong>of</strong> Ukraine, Kiev, Ukraine;<br />

ufensia@gmail.com<br />

The study <strong>of</strong> biology <strong>of</strong> agaonid wasps (Agaonidae) reveals a great evolutionary success <strong>of</strong><br />

the fig and fig wasps pollination mutualism. Figs and fig wasps represent one <strong>of</strong> the best<br />

examples <strong>of</strong> species-specific mutualism and coevolution. The community <strong>of</strong> "figs-fig wasps"<br />

can be considered as a model system for coevolution and phylogenetic study. Life cycle <strong>of</strong> fig<br />

wasp Blastophaga psenes (L.) (Chalcidoidea, Agaonidae) as example <strong>of</strong> coevolution <strong>of</strong><br />

obligate symbionts-pollinators and parasitic agaonid wasps with fig trees (Ficus carica L.).<br />

Material <strong>of</strong> B. psenes was collected in the fig tree plantations <strong>of</strong> the State Nikita Botanical<br />

Garden (Crimea, Yalta, Ukraine) during 2006-2009. New original data on life cycle, larval<br />

development, adult behaviour and phenology <strong>of</strong> three generations <strong>of</strong> B. psenes as an obligate<br />

pollinator <strong>of</strong> edible fig trees (Ficus carica L.) in the Crimea (Ukraine) were received by the<br />

author. Females and males <strong>of</strong> B. psenes induce a gall and develop from eggs into adults inside<br />

syconia on male fig trees (caprifigs). It was observed that in the Crimea the larvae <strong>of</strong> B.<br />

psenes overwinter in the galls inside caprifigs and pupate in the second or third weeks <strong>of</strong><br />

April. The copulation <strong>of</strong> males and females occurs inside the caprifigs. The males emerge<br />

before the females and gnaw an exit hole from inside the caprifig through the scales <strong>of</strong> the<br />

stigma. The females escape through this hole later. In the spring (April-May) the females <strong>of</strong><br />

1st generation B. psenes lay eggs in short-style pistils inside the inflorescence <strong>of</strong> caprifigs. In<br />

June-July 2nd generation B. psenes females emerge from the caprifigs and migrate to<br />

pollinate long-style pistils inside the inflorescence <strong>of</strong> female fig trees. Near the end <strong>of</strong> this<br />

period <strong>of</strong> pollination (July-August) some 2nd generation females <strong>of</strong> B. psenes oviposit in the<br />

short-style pistils. In September-October females <strong>of</strong> the final 3rd generation <strong>of</strong> B. psenes lay<br />

eggs inside the caprifigs and the larvae <strong>of</strong> this generation hibernate until the following spring.<br />

The emergence <strong>of</strong> 1st generation B. psenes was observed from the end <strong>of</strong> April up to the end<br />

<strong>of</strong> May (21.IV.-26.V.2007 and 28.IV.-30.V.2008). The 2nd generation B. psenes was<br />

80


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

observed from the end <strong>of</strong> June to the end <strong>of</strong> July (25.VI.-26.VII.2007 and 02.VII.-<br />

25.VII.2008). The 3rd generation <strong>of</strong> B. psenes was observed from the end <strong>of</strong> September to the<br />

beginning <strong>of</strong> October (30.IX.-10.X.2007 and 03.X.-14.X.2008). The earliest dates <strong>of</strong><br />

oviposition <strong>of</strong> B. psenes were recorded as: 1st generation – 21-28.IV., 2nd – 30.VII.-02.VIII,<br />

and 3rd – 30.IX.-03.X. Oviposition was observed to continue for: 1st generation 32-35 days,<br />

2nd – 9-16 days, and 3rd – 11-12 days. The earliest dates <strong>of</strong> pollination <strong>of</strong> female fig trees by<br />

2nd generation <strong>of</strong> B. psenes was noted as 25.VI.-02.VII. and continued for 23-31 days. The<br />

total period <strong>of</strong> development <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> the three generations <strong>of</strong> B. psenes were: 1st generation<br />

– 192-236 days, 2nd – 31-67 days, and 3rd – 65-77 days. One species <strong>of</strong> agaonid wasp,<br />

Philotrypesis caricae (L.) (Agaonidae), being the parasitoid <strong>of</strong> B. psenes was recorded in the<br />

Crimea on F. carica. It was observed that females <strong>of</strong> Ph. caricae do not participate in the<br />

pollination <strong>of</strong> F. carica trees. The larvae <strong>of</strong> Ph. caricae develop as parasitoids <strong>of</strong> B. psenes in<br />

the galled inflorescence <strong>of</strong> caprifigs <strong>of</strong> F. carica. The females <strong>of</strong> Ph. caricae have a very long<br />

ovipositor that exceeds the length <strong>of</strong> the female's body. Females <strong>of</strong> Ph. caricae penetrate the<br />

rounded galls inside young caprifigs and lay eggs inside the larvae <strong>of</strong> B. psenes.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Flower visiting by Sand Wasps in southern Africa<br />

Sarah K. Gess & Friedrich W. Gess<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, Albany Museum and Rhodes University, Grahamstown, 6139 South Africa;<br />

s.gess@ru.ac.za; f.gess@ru.ac.za<br />

The synthesis <strong>of</strong> the knowledge <strong>of</strong> the natural history and behaviour <strong>of</strong> the Sand Wasps by<br />

Howard Evans and Kevin O’Neill (2007) indicates that little has been published on flower<br />

visiting by Sand Wasps. This being so it seems <strong>of</strong> interest to examine the flower visiting<br />

records associated with the Albany Museum collection <strong>of</strong> Sand Wasps (Crabronidae:<br />

Bembicinae, as recognized by Pulawski 2010). The majority are derived from the purposeful<br />

collecting by Friedrich and Sarah Gess during the course <strong>of</strong> their study <strong>of</strong> aculeate wasps and<br />

bees in the semi-arid to arid areas <strong>of</strong> southern Africa.<br />

The genera represented are Bembix (13 spp., 394 records), Hopliosoides (1 sp., 19 records),<br />

Handlirschia (1 sp., 10 records), Kohlia (1 sp., 117 records), Bembecinus (18 spp., 344<br />

records), Stizus (6 spp., 184 records) and Stizoides (3 spp., 7 records).<br />

In the semi-arid to arid areas <strong>of</strong> southern Africa these genera most commonly visit small<br />

flowered readily accessible flowers <strong>of</strong> one or more <strong>of</strong> the families, Asteraceae, Fabaceae<br />

(Acacia), Amaranthaceae, Molluginaceae, Aizoaceae (non-Mesembryanthema), Apiaceae,<br />

Nyctaginaceae, Zygophyllaceae, Celastraceae and Scrophulariaceae (in particular Selago), all<br />

generalist flowers. Some Bembix species are in addition not uncommon visitors to Aizoaceae<br />

(Mesembryanthema) and Apocynaceae (Asclepias).<br />

No species <strong>of</strong> Bembicinae are broadly polyphagus as are some bees, most notably in the<br />

family Apidae. None are specialists. As regards pollination services, all transport pollen and<br />

can be considered to be amongst the potential pollinators <strong>of</strong> the generalist flowers. Bembix<br />

and Stizus, visiting flowers <strong>of</strong> Apocynaceae, like spider hunting wasps (Pompilidae) visiting<br />

these flowers, transport pollinia giving them the potential to be pollinators. Most ‘mesems’<br />

are most frequently and dependably pollinated by pollen wasps (Masarinae) and bees,<br />

however, Bembix do have the potential to be additional pollinators <strong>of</strong> the ‘mesem’ flowers<br />

that they visit.<br />

____________________________________<br />

81


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Chromosomes <strong>of</strong> Xyela julii (Xyelidae) and karyotype evolution in the order<br />

Hymenoptera<br />

Vladimir E. Gokhman<br />

Botanical Garden, Moscow State University, Moscow 119991 Russia; gokhman@bg.msu.ru<br />

The order Hymenoptera is the largest group <strong>of</strong> haplodiploid insects with the predominantly<br />

arrhenotokous mode <strong>of</strong> reproduction. Chromosomes <strong>of</strong> approximately 1800 species <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Hymenoptera are studied up to now. These species belong to all traditional major subdivisions<br />

<strong>of</strong> the order, namely: the suborder Symphyta (about 400 studied species) as well as Parasitica<br />

(more than 400 studied species) and Aculeata (about 1000 studied species); two latter groups<br />

are usually merged into the suborder Apocrita. Although a few attempts <strong>of</strong> phylogenetic<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> chromosomal diversity in the order were made since the 1970s, karyotype<br />

structure <strong>of</strong> the most ancient hymenopteran family Xyelidae which was detected in the fossil<br />

record since the middle <strong>of</strong> the Triassic, was previously unknown. I have managed for the first<br />

time to study chromosomes <strong>of</strong> the common European species <strong>of</strong> this family, Xyela julii<br />

(Brébisson). This species has 2n = 50; most chromosomes are relatively small subtelocentrics<br />

and acrocentrics. These data confirm an assumption that a number <strong>of</strong> moderate reductions in<br />

the chromosome number (to n = 18-20 and less) through chromosomal fusions occurred<br />

within different groups <strong>of</strong> the Symphyta. These reductions, however, were more substantial<br />

(to n = 7-10 and less) in the superfamily Tenthredinoidea where large biarmed chromosomes<br />

predominate in many species. On the other hand, the superfamily Pamphilioidea is likely to<br />

have higher ancestral n values (20 to 26). A chromosome set with n = 14-19 is considered<br />

ancestral for the suborder Apocrita. A number <strong>of</strong> independent decreases in chromosome<br />

number (to n = 10-11 and then to n = 4-6 and less) were also detected in various groups <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Parasitica. The phenomenon <strong>of</strong> parallel reductions in the chromosome number within<br />

different groups <strong>of</strong> the order, especially within the Symphyta and Parasitica, represents an<br />

excellent example <strong>of</strong> the so-called karyotypic orthoselection. Although Aculeata are usually<br />

considered the best karyotypically studied group <strong>of</strong> the order, many aspects <strong>of</strong> the existing<br />

pattern <strong>of</strong> karyotype evolution within this group are still poorly known. For example, the<br />

highest chromosome number in the Hymenoptera, 2n = 120 found in South American<br />

Dinoponera lucida Emery (Formicidae), was published just about two years ago. Moreover,<br />

according to the results <strong>of</strong> the preliminary phylogenetic analysis, the trend towards an<br />

increase in the chromosome number through centric fissions that is traditionally ascribed to<br />

the superfamilies Vespoidea and Formicoidea, is likely to have operated only at the level <strong>of</strong><br />

certain genera and species.<br />

____________________________________<br />

<br />

Foodweb structure and diversity <strong>of</strong> parasitoid communities (Hym., Chalcidoidea) <strong>of</strong><br />

herb gallwasps (Hymenoptera, Cynipidae) inducing galls on Lamiaceae<br />

J.F. Gómez 1 , Richard R. Askew 2 & José Luis Nieves-Aldrey 3*<br />

1 Dpto de Zoología y Antropología Física. Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas (UCM). C/ Jose Antonio Novais, 2,<br />

28040 Madrid, Spain; jf.gomez@bio.ucm.es<br />

2 5, Beeston Hall Mews, Beeston, Tarporley, Cheshire CW6 9TZ, England<br />

3 Dpto. de Biodiversidad y Biología Evolutiva. Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC). C/ José Gutiérrez<br />

Abascal, 2, 28006 Madrid, Spain; aldrey@mncn.csic.es<br />

We compiled literature data and unpublished qualitative and quantitative information on the<br />

parasitoid community (Hymenoptera Chalcidoidea) <strong>of</strong> herb gall wasps (Hymenoptera,<br />

82


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Cynipidae, ”Aylacini”) inducing galls on different species <strong>of</strong> plants <strong>of</strong> the family Lamiaceae.<br />

The host gall community is composed <strong>of</strong> 4 cynipid species inducing galls on stems, leaves<br />

and fruits <strong>of</strong> different species <strong>of</strong> Glechoma, Nepeta and Salvia. Liposthenes glechomae<br />

(Linnaeus, 1758) galling stems and leaves <strong>of</strong> Glechoma hederacea L.; L. kerneri (Wachtl,<br />

1891) on fruits <strong>of</strong> Nepeta ssp.; Neaylax salviae (Giraud, 1859) on fruits <strong>of</strong> Salvia<br />

lavandulifolia Vahl. and N. verbenacus (Nieves-Aldrey, 1988) also on fruits <strong>of</strong> Salvia<br />

verbenaca L. The studied associated parasitoid community accounted 16 identified species<br />

belonging to six chalcidoid families as follows: Eulophidae (2), Eupelmidae (3), Eurytomidae<br />

(3), Ormyridae (2), Pteromalidae (2) and Torymidae (4) (Hym., Chalcidoidea). The two<br />

cynipid species galling fruits <strong>of</strong> Salvia share related parasitoid components although Neaylax<br />

salviae accounted more species. The parasitoid community associated to Liposthenes<br />

glechomae is more diverse than the one observed in L. kerneri. Semiquantitative food webs<br />

and quantitative data for the studied communities are presented.<br />

____________________________________<br />

<br />

Larval morphology <strong>of</strong> Pteromalidae (Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea) parasitoids <strong>of</strong><br />

gallwasps (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae) in Europe<br />

J.F. Gómez 1 , Richard R. Askew 2 & José Luis Nieves-Aldrey 3*<br />

1 Dpto de Zoología y Antropología Física. Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas (UCM). C/ Jose Antonio Novais, 2,<br />

28040 Madrid, Spain; jf.gomez@bio.ucm.es<br />

2 5, Beeston Hall Mews, Beeston, Tarporley, Cheshire CW6 9TZ, England<br />

3 Dpto. de Biodiversidad y Biología Evolutiva. Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC). C/ José Gutiérrez<br />

Abascal, 2, 28006 Madrid, Spain; aldrey@mncn.csic.es<br />

The large chalcidoid family Pteromalidae is one <strong>of</strong> the main components <strong>of</strong> the parasitoid<br />

community inhabiting cynipid galls (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae). About 50 pteromalid species<br />

taking part <strong>of</strong> that community have been recorded in the Palaearctic. However knowledge <strong>of</strong><br />

larval morphology and biology for most species is still poor. Here is presented a<br />

comprehensive and comparative study <strong>of</strong> larval morphology and biology <strong>of</strong> seven species <strong>of</strong><br />

Pteromalidae parasitoids <strong>of</strong> gall wasps in Europe. The studied species were: Rivasia fumariae<br />

Askew & Nieves-Aldrey, Stinoplus lapsanae Graham, Pteromalus bedeguaris (Thomson),<br />

Pteromalus hieracii (Thomson), Pteromalus isarchus Walker, Arthrolytus glandium Boucek<br />

and Cecidostiba fungosa Ge<strong>of</strong>froy in Fourcroy. The studied species are representatives <strong>of</strong> the<br />

specific parasitoid components associated to different gall wasp food guilds: galls on herbs,<br />

shrubs, and galls on oaks. In the larval descriptive study special reference was made upon<br />

body shape, head capsule, mouthparts and mandibles and also on chaetotaxy <strong>of</strong> head. The<br />

terminal-instar larvae <strong>of</strong> all studied species is for the first time thoroughly described and<br />

illustrated with SEM pictures as well as diagnostic characters for the studied genera are<br />

provided. A key for the identification <strong>of</strong> terminal instar larvae <strong>of</strong> the seven species reared<br />

from cynipids galls is also given. Information, including new rearing records, is given on the<br />

larval biology <strong>of</strong> each species. Most studied pteromalid larvae are solitary ectoparasitoids <strong>of</strong><br />

the host cynipid larvae with different trophic ranges from monophagous to polyphagous.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Diversity and distribution <strong>of</strong> the Formica species in Georgia (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)<br />

Nana Gratiashvili 1 *, Bernhard Seifert 2 & Shalva Barjadze 1<br />

1 Entomology and Biocontrol Research Centre <strong>of</strong> Ilia State University, 0179, Tbilisi, Georgia;<br />

nanagratiashvili@yahoo.com<br />

83


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

2 Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, Senckenberg Museum für Naturkunde, Am Museum 1, D- 02826 Goerlitz,<br />

Germany; bernhard.seifert@senckenberg.de<br />

144 species <strong>of</strong> ants belonging to 4 subfamilies and 35 genera are recorded from Georgia. The<br />

most widely distributed and species-rich genus is Formica making up 18 species. The<br />

subgenus Serviformica is represented by 11 species, the subgenus Formica s.str. by 3 species,<br />

the subgenus Copt<strong>of</strong>ormica - by 3 species, while the subgenus Raptiformica is represented by<br />

only 1 species. One species <strong>of</strong> the subgenus Copt<strong>of</strong>ormica from the Great Caucasus is new for<br />

science. Queens <strong>of</strong> Formica georgica Seifert, 2002 are recorded for the first time. Maps <strong>of</strong><br />

Georgia are presented showing the collecting sites for each subgenus. Faunistic similarity<br />

coefficients between the ants living in the different administrate regions and vegetation belts<br />

are estimated and the corresponding cluster diagrams are presented.<br />

____________________________________<br />

First record <strong>of</strong> Wolbachia in Trissolcus species (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae)<br />

Nurper Guz 1 , Erhan Kocak 2* , A. Emre Akpinar 3 , M. Oktay Gürkan 1 & A. Neset Kilincer 1<br />

1 Ankara University Faculty <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Ankara Turkey; nurperguz@agri.ankara.edu.tr<br />

2 Ankara Plant Protection Central Research Institute, Ankara Turkey<br />

3 Ankara University Biotechnology Institue, Ankara Turkey<br />

The sunn pest Eurygaster integriceps Puton (Hemiptera: Scutelleridae) is a major pest <strong>of</strong><br />

wheat and barley in wide areas <strong>of</strong> the near and middle east, west and central Asia, north<br />

Africa, and eastern and south Europe (Brown 1965; Critchley 1998; Praker et al. 2002). The<br />

pest feeds on both vegetative stages <strong>of</strong> the plant and maturing grain. Sunn pest infestations in<br />

some areas can lead to 100% crop loss in the absence <strong>of</strong> control measures. The current<br />

management strategy for this pest mainly relies on chemical control. In addition to the high<br />

cost, insecticides pose a risk to the balance <strong>of</strong> nature and resistance has developed to various<br />

types <strong>of</strong> insecticides. Thus new control methods are needed to diminish reliance on<br />

insecticides for control <strong>of</strong> this serious crop pest. Among natural controls the most promising<br />

<strong>of</strong> them are the egg parasitoids. The most important egg parasitoids belong to the genus<br />

Trissolcus Ashmead and Telenomus Haliday (Hymenoptera, Scelionidae). Especially<br />

frequently observed parasitoid species play a potential role in suppressing sunn pest<br />

populations below the economic threshold however, the success <strong>of</strong> the parasitoid varies<br />

among the regions and varies from year to year. Several studies have been conducted in order<br />

to improve the efficiency <strong>of</strong> the parasitoid. Since the success <strong>of</strong> a biological control is<br />

dependent on many factors, including mass rearing <strong>of</strong> the beneficial in the laboratory and<br />

release <strong>of</strong> the beneficial which can be a great concern. We hypothesized Wolbachia infection<br />

might affect the establishment <strong>of</strong> Trissolcus species. Wolbachia is an intracellular symbiont<br />

which causes reproductive alterations including cytoplasmic incompatibility, feminization,<br />

parthenogenesis and male-killing in many host insects (O’Neill et al. 1992; Bourtzis &<br />

O’Neill 1998; Werren 1997; Hurst et al. 2000). In this study we detected Wolbachia as an<br />

endosymbiont <strong>of</strong> Trissolcus species, for the first time, by using polymerase chain reaction<br />

(PCR) analysis. We used universal primers <strong>of</strong> wsp gene encoding a surface protein <strong>of</strong><br />

Wolbachia in PCR amplifications. After cloning PCR products we designed new primers<br />

which are specific to Wolbachia harbored in Trissolcus species. Using species specific<br />

primers we scanned Trissolcus species including T. festivae, T. grandis, T. simoni, T.<br />

semistriatus, T. vassillievi, T. rufiventrus and T. flavipes in terms <strong>of</strong> Wolbachia infection. Wsp<br />

gene sequences <strong>of</strong> different parasitoids have been reported. With this study Wolbachia<br />

infection status <strong>of</strong> various Trissolcus species was recognized. Further cross mating<br />

84


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

experiments should be done in order to learn more about the role <strong>of</strong> Wolbachia in cytoplasmic<br />

incompatibility.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Some biological aspects <strong>of</strong> a seed pest wasp, Bruchophagus astragali<br />

(Hym.: Eurytomidae), in rangelands <strong>of</strong> Chaharmahal & Bakhtiary province <strong>of</strong> Iran<br />

Farschad Haghighian 1 & Seyed Ebrahim Sadeghi 2*<br />

1 Agricultural and Natural Resource Research Center, P.O.Box 405, Shahrekord, Iran; fhagh101@yahoo.com<br />

2 Research Institute <strong>of</strong> Forest and Ranglands, P.O.Box 13185-116, Tehran, Iran; ebrasadeghi@gmail.com<br />

The most important forage plants in rangelands <strong>of</strong> Chaharmahal & Bakhtiary province <strong>of</strong> Iran<br />

belong to the family Papilionaceae. The knowledge <strong>of</strong> the main factors that affect these<br />

valuable plant species is important for their management and maximum decreasing <strong>of</strong> the<br />

damage level. A survey carried out during 2002-07, showed that the eurytomid wasp,<br />

Bruchophagus astragali, is one <strong>of</strong> the most important seed pests <strong>of</strong> plants in the Papilionaceae<br />

family. This insect was reported for the first time by the authors from Chaharmahal &<br />

Bakhtiary province in 2004. The wasp lays eggs into seed pods, the hatched larvae feed in<br />

seeds and by the end <strong>of</strong> their developing entirely consume the seed. The infected seed pods<br />

were collected from rangelands and adults were reared under the laboratory conditions.<br />

Different species <strong>of</strong> Papilionaceae were proposed to the reared adults and the results indicate<br />

that B. astragali were active on plants from all genera <strong>of</strong> Papilionaceae, therefore, B.astragali<br />

is an oligophagous pest. The most important natural enemy <strong>of</strong> this pest appeared to be a<br />

parasitoid chalcid wasp from the genus Tetrastichus sp (Chalcidoidea: Eulophidae), an<br />

ectoparasitoid <strong>of</strong> larvae. The parasitism rate <strong>of</strong> B. astragali by this parasitoid was 9- 13%.<br />

____________________________________<br />

New data on the occurrence <strong>of</strong> stephanids (Hymenoptera, Stephanidae)<br />

in Turkey and Greece<br />

Jacek Hilszczaski<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Forest Protection, Forest Research Institute, Sekocin Stary ul. Braci Lesnej 3<br />

05-090 Raszyn, Poland; hilszczj@ibles.waw.pl<br />

Stephanidae is a small cosmopolitan family occurring mostly in tropical and subtropical forest<br />

ecosystems, where these idiobiont parasitoids are associated with wood boring beetles. In the<br />

Palaearctic the family is predominantly known from the southern part <strong>of</strong> the region.<br />

Stephanids are rare in collections and only Stephanus serrator Panzer is recorded from many<br />

countries (Fauna Europaea). From Turkey, where the diversity <strong>of</strong> potential hosts <strong>of</strong> stephanids<br />

is as high as or higher than in Europe, stephanids have been recorded only recently (Yildirim<br />

& Kolarov 2006). Similarly in Greece only the most common S. serrator has been listed so<br />

far. In the present work some results <strong>of</strong> collecting and rearing stephanids are presented. Three<br />

species are new for Turkey: Megischus anomalipes Foerster, S. serrator, and Afromegischus<br />

gigas (Schletterer) as well as a new record <strong>of</strong> Foenatopus turcomanorum Semenov. M.<br />

anomalipes is recorded as new for Greece. Data on host and habitat are presented for some<br />

species.<br />

____________________________________<br />

85


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Research <strong>of</strong> the family Ichneumonidae in the Czech Republic<br />

Kamil Holy<br />

Crop Research Institute, Drnovska 507, CZ-161 06 Prague, Czech Republic; holy@vurv.cz<br />

The family Ichneumonidae is one <strong>of</strong> insufficiently explored insect families in the Czech<br />

Republic (CZ). The total number <strong>of</strong> species has been estimated as 3,000; however, the<br />

checklist, which is currently under preparation, lists only approximately 2,000 species. A<br />

regularly updated checklist version is available online at http://hymenopteracz.sweb.cz/.<br />

Many individuals found within the CZ territory are dispersed in foreign museums and private<br />

collections. Should you have any information about species not included in the checklist,<br />

please let me know.<br />

The family Ichneumonidae has been studied intensively in the Czech Republic only by<br />

Frantisek Gregor sen. during the first half <strong>of</strong> the last century and Josef Sedivy in the second<br />

half <strong>of</strong> 20 th century and at the beginning <strong>of</strong> the 21 st century. In the forties and fifties <strong>of</strong> the last<br />

century the Ichneumonologist Radoslav Obrtel was very active, as well as Serhij Kolubajiv in<br />

the middle <strong>of</strong> the century who studied the importance <strong>of</strong> ichneumonids as parasitoids <strong>of</strong> forest<br />

insect pests. Currently, 2 – 3 researchers are extensively engaged in the research <strong>of</strong> this family<br />

in the CZ.<br />

Predominant majority <strong>of</strong> historical collections <strong>of</strong> the family Ichneumonidae are located in<br />

the National Museum, Prague (collection <strong>of</strong> J. Sedivy and F. Gregor) and Moravian Museum,<br />

Brno. Smaller collections are found in the Silesian Museum, Opava; Crop Research Institute,<br />

Prague; Forestry and Game Management Research Institute, Strnady; and Museum <strong>of</strong> Eastern<br />

Bohemia, Hradec Kralove.<br />

A systematically arranged collection can be found only in the National Museum, Prague, and<br />

in the Museum <strong>of</strong> Eastern Bohemia, Hradec Kralove. The other collections are gradually<br />

being classified in subfamilies. Only the individuals <strong>of</strong> the subfamily Rhyssinae have been<br />

determined in their entirety and entered in a database from all museum collections, and the<br />

subfamilies Acaenitinae, Agriotypinae and Collyriinae are about to be completed.<br />

The occurrence and ecological demands <strong>of</strong> selected species will be presented at the<br />

conference.<br />

This work was partly supported by grant <strong>of</strong> Ministry <strong>of</strong> Agriculture MZE 0002700604.<br />

____________________________________<br />

The resources <strong>of</strong> Trichogrammatidae and Mymaridae and their utilization in biological<br />

control in Xinjiang, China<br />

Hongying Hu<br />

College <strong>of</strong> Life Science and Technology, Xinjiang University, Urumq, 830046 China; hoohyii@sina.com<br />

Based upon the extensive investigation <strong>of</strong> Trichogrammatidae and Mymaridae fauna in<br />

Xinjiang, China during 2001-2008, mainly collected by sweeping and further examination <strong>of</strong><br />

mounted specimens in thousands <strong>of</strong> slides, 19 genera with 48 species <strong>of</strong> Trichogrammatidae<br />

and 16 genera with 54 species <strong>of</strong> Mymaridae were found and described, including new<br />

distribution records for China and new species for science.<br />

Additionally, Trichogramma pintoi Voegele was found in much arid region (Fukang desert),<br />

and Ufensia xinjiangensis Hu et Lin is widely distributed in Xinjiang, which provide a<br />

scientific reference for the use <strong>of</strong> the native natural enemy to control pests in Xinjiang. The<br />

86


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

biological characters <strong>of</strong> these two species were studied. The richest trichogrammatid and<br />

mymarid fauna is in Jungar basin where the fauna component is very complex. The Tarim<br />

basin species richness is lower, the fauna component is simpler. Species richness in Eastern<br />

basins is higher than in Tarim basin. The species richness in Tianshan Mountains is lower<br />

than in Jungar and Tarim basins mainly due to the inadequate collecting.<br />

Xinjiang is the largest province in China, encounting 1/6 <strong>of</strong> total area. There are two large<br />

basins, many <strong>of</strong> them are oasis, with wide and flat land, it is beneficial to control the pest by<br />

natural enemy, especially for using Trichogramma for controlling Helicoverpa armigera and<br />

Ostrinia furnalis. For thirty years, the plant protection experts in Xinjiang (Yang Haifeng,<br />

Guo Wenchao, Ma Qi etc.) introduced T. chilonis, T. pintoi and T. ostriniae from Central Asia<br />

and inner land <strong>of</strong> China into Xinjiang, to control the dominant pest, Helicoverpa armigera<br />

and Ostrinia furnalis, but it was difficult for these species to adapt to the extremely dry and<br />

hot environment, so looking for the native species is the key to biocontrol the pest.<br />

____________________________________<br />

EOS, Revista ibérica de Entomología, soon available online<br />

Isabel Izquierdo Moya 1 *, José Martín Cano 2 & Carolina Martín Albadalejo 1<br />

1 Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC), C/José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, 28006 Madrid, Spain;<br />

izquierdo@mncn.csic.es<br />

2 Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain<br />

Eos, the earliest Spanish magazine devoted to Entomology, had to be closed in 1994, after a<br />

life <strong>of</strong> sixty-nine year, due to budget adjustments <strong>of</strong> the CSIC, the Spanish Scientific Research<br />

Council. Now, thanks to a project funded by the institution itself, we are working on<br />

digitizing the contents <strong>of</strong> the 69 volumes <strong>of</strong> the journal in order to upload them to Internet.<br />

In this communication we report the current status <strong>of</strong> our project and the website where the<br />

journal could be localized in a near future. We also <strong>of</strong>fer details about the contents <strong>of</strong> the<br />

magazine as subjects, authors, geographic areas covered, descriptions <strong>of</strong> new taxa, and so on.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Contribution <strong>of</strong> EOS, Revista Española de Entomología, (1925-1994) to the knowledge <strong>of</strong><br />

the Hymenoptera<br />

Isabel Izquierdo Moya<br />

Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC), C/José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, 28006 Madrid, Spain;<br />

izquierdo@mncn.csic.es<br />

This communication presents an analysis <strong>of</strong> the articles about the Order Hymenoptera that<br />

were published in EOS during his 69 years <strong>of</strong> life. These papers constitute a significant<br />

volume in the magazine since they represent nearly the 20% <strong>of</strong> the total <strong>of</strong> 1201 articles<br />

published in it.<br />

It provides data on the authors, types <strong>of</strong> research and contents <strong>of</strong> these works, the faunas and<br />

geographical areas considered, as well as the new taxa described and most relevant revisions.<br />

____________________________________<br />

87


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Updates to the evolution <strong>of</strong> torymids (Hymenoptera: Torymidae)<br />

Petr Janšta<br />

Charles University, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Sciencies, Department <strong>of</strong> Zoology, Vininá 7, 128 44 Prague 2, Czech Republic;<br />

janstapetr@gmail.com<br />

Torymidae is one <strong>of</strong> the middiverse group <strong>of</strong> chalcids (together about 650 described species<br />

worldwide classified into ca 70 genera). Up to now, phylogeny was reconstructed by Grissell<br />

(1995) based on morphological characters. He estimated two subfamilies (Megastigminae and<br />

Toryminae) and 7 tribes within Toryminae. Phylogenetic position <strong>of</strong> 7 genera is still<br />

unresolved and they are classified as incertae sedis. Most <strong>of</strong> the torymids are primarily<br />

ectoparasitoids <strong>of</strong> various gall makers (mainly <strong>of</strong> Cynipidae and Cecidomyiidae), mantids<br />

eggs or larvae <strong>of</strong> bees, phytophagous species are quite rare within subfamily Toryminae. On<br />

the other hand, the number <strong>of</strong> known species <strong>of</strong> Megastigminae are phytophagous species,<br />

mostly they belong to the genus Megastigmus. But there are also some genera <strong>of</strong><br />

Megastigminae which are ectoparasitoids <strong>of</strong> various gall makers. It is generally supposed that<br />

Megastigminae is the more primitive than Torymidae and the phytophagous strategy is<br />

ancestral for whole family.<br />

Based on sequencing <strong>of</strong> 28S rDNA <strong>of</strong> about half <strong>of</strong> known genera <strong>of</strong> torymids I have got<br />

evidence to support all estimated tribes. The subfamily Megastigminae seems to be really<br />

more basal to the rest <strong>of</strong> the family. All <strong>of</strong> tribes are also well supported but their position to<br />

each other is still unclear. The most basal tribe <strong>of</strong> Toryminae seems to be tribe Chalcimerini.<br />

Position <strong>of</strong> nearly all taxa published by Grissell (1995) as incertae sedis are classified based<br />

on 28S rDNA into known tribes. The phytophagy as ancestral strategy can not be refused, but<br />

there is new theory that phytophagy can be secondarily developed and the ancestor <strong>of</strong><br />

torymids could be rather zoophagous.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Morphometrics and host information for the support <strong>of</strong> phylogenetic relations in genera<br />

Microterys Thomson and Aschitus Mercet (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae)<br />

George Japoshvili<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, Institute <strong>of</strong> Zoology, Ilia Chavchavadze State University, Tbilisi, Georgia;<br />

giorgij70@yahoo.com<br />

The systematic relationship between the encyrtid genera Microterys and Aschitus was<br />

investigated using a phylogenetic analysis based on 35 morphometric character traits scored<br />

from 26 species housed in the Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Madrid. The results <strong>of</strong><br />

the analysis were combined with host information which was obtained from the Universal<br />

Chalcidoidea Database and ScaleNet. In all, 78 species <strong>of</strong> hosts have been recorded for 18 <strong>of</strong><br />

the studied parasitoid species. Preliminary results show that M. zarina and M. aeneiventris<br />

should be transferred back to Microterys from Aschitus. A separate morphometric study<br />

indicates that Aschitus incertus should be regarded a new, subjective synonym <strong>of</strong> Aschitus<br />

madyes.<br />

____________________________________<br />

88


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Preliminary investigation <strong>of</strong> Chalcidoidea in Hainan Island, China<br />

Tian-Yang Jiao 1,2 & Hui Xiao 1<br />

1 Key Laboratory <strong>of</strong> Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Institute <strong>of</strong> Zoology, Chinese Academy <strong>of</strong> Sciences,<br />

Beijing 100101, P. R. China; huixiaouk@yahoo.com<br />

2 Graduate University <strong>of</strong> Chinese Academy <strong>of</strong> Sciences, Beijing 100049, P. R. China; jiaoty@ioz.ac.cn<br />

Hainan province is the southernmost and smallest province <strong>of</strong> China, located in the South <strong>of</strong><br />

China Sea. There are many islands in Hainan province, <strong>of</strong> which the largest island is Hainan<br />

Island. Hainan Island is located in tropical areas south <strong>of</strong> the Tropic <strong>of</strong> Cancer, separated from<br />

Guangdong's Leizhou Peninsula to the north by a shallow and narrow strait. Investigation <strong>of</strong><br />

Biodiversity <strong>of</strong> Hanan Island is a Basic research supported by the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Sciences and<br />

Technology <strong>of</strong> the China. This project is began four years ago and initiated in November<br />

2006. The project planned as a five-year project, and the goal was to investigate and discover<br />

species including plant, Vertebrate, Invertebrates and Fungi in the Island. We collected 3<br />

times once a year at different season and till now we had collected 5500 specimens <strong>of</strong><br />

Chalcidoidea.<br />

We found there are 16 families <strong>of</strong> Chalcidoidea distributed in Hainan Island. They are<br />

Agaonidae, Aphelinidae, Chalcididae, Encyrtidae, Eucharitidae, Eulophidae, Eupelmidae,<br />

Eurytomidae, Mymaridae, Ormyridae, Pteromalidae, Signiphoridae, Tanaostigmatidae,<br />

Tetracampidae, Torymidae, Trichogrammatidae. Among these, four families, Ormyridae,<br />

Signiphoridae, Tanaostigmatidae and Tetracampidae are newly recorded in Hainan Island.<br />

There are 106 genus recorded (no include genus <strong>of</strong> Encyrtidae, Eulophidea and Agonidae): 7<br />

genus <strong>of</strong> Aphelinidae, 5 genus <strong>of</strong> Chalcididae, 3 genuse <strong>of</strong> Eucharitidae, 6 genus <strong>of</strong><br />

Eupelmidae, 7 genus <strong>of</strong> Eurytomidae, 9 genus <strong>of</strong> Mymaridae, 1 genus <strong>of</strong> Ormyridae, 52 genus<br />

<strong>of</strong> Pteromalidae, 1 genus <strong>of</strong> Signiphoridae, 1 genus <strong>of</strong> Tanaostigmatidae, 2 genus <strong>of</strong><br />

Tetracampidae, 9 genus <strong>of</strong> Torymidae, 3 genus <strong>of</strong> Trichogrammatidae. Among these, four<br />

families, Ormyridae, Signiphoridae, Tanaostigmatidae and Tetracampidae 85 genus <strong>of</strong> them<br />

are new records in Hainan Island, including 13 genus newly recorded in China (Schizaspidia<br />

Westwood, Orasema Cameron, Plutarchia Girault, Ramdasoma Narendran, Epiclerus<br />

Haliday, Tetracampe Förster, Australoodera Girault, Rhynchoticida Bouek, Signiphora<br />

Ashmead, Apycnetron Bouek, Aggelma Delucchi, Pseudocatolaccus Masi, Caenacis<br />

Förster).<br />

Till now, there are 142 species which had been identified. 92 species <strong>of</strong> them are new records<br />

in Hainan Island; including 39 species are newly recorded in China.<br />

The project is still ongoing. There are probably 7-16 new species which will be described.<br />

Based on all the material which we collected, 10 percent <strong>of</strong> all the specimens is Pteromalidae,<br />

70 percent is Eulophidae. The other 20 percent is material <strong>of</strong> all the other families. It shows<br />

that Pteromalidae, Eulophidae, Encyrtidae and Agaonidae are very richness in Hainan Island.<br />

The further taxonomic work will be focus on these families.<br />

____________________________________<br />

The Swedish Malaise Trap Project<br />

One step further!<br />

Dave Karlsson<br />

Ärvingevägen 14, 164 46 Stockholm, Sweden; dave.karlsson@nrm.se<br />

89


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

The Swedish Malaise Trap Project (SMTP) was launched in 2003 with the aim <strong>of</strong> making<br />

fresh material available for morphological and molecular research on insects, particularly<br />

poorly known groups such as the Hymenoptera and Diptera. The field part was concluded in<br />

2006 and resulted in 1,900 samples (190 trap-years) containing an estimated 40 million<br />

specimens. Since then, the focus has been on sorting and sending out the material for<br />

identification and taxonomic research, and about 40 % <strong>of</strong> the material are sorted hitherto. The<br />

out-sorted insects have shown to be a real gold mind for entomologists and a network <strong>of</strong><br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional systematists and amateur taxonomists are now working on the material.<br />

The main goals for the SMTP is to (1) sort and distribute all the collected insects; (2) compile<br />

and make available species lists for the identified material; (3) build, adequately document<br />

and preserve our reference collection for future barcoding <strong>of</strong> the Swedish insect fauna; (4)<br />

analyze the efficiency <strong>of</strong> the SMTP in collecting the Swedish insect fauna to better estimate<br />

the size and composition <strong>of</strong> the fauna and to optimize future collecting efforts in Sweden as<br />

well as world wide; and (5) engage in outreach activities inspired by the results obtained in<br />

the project.<br />

We estimate that at least half the Swedish insect species, probably more, are represented in<br />

the material. Species lists and reference material for DNA barcoding are already continuously<br />

returned and the results so far indicate that the material may contain up to 5,000 new Swedish<br />

species, more than 1,000 <strong>of</strong> which may be new to science. These results appear to support our<br />

initial guess that the SMTP would increase the known Swedish insect fauna from 25,000 to<br />

more than 30,000.<br />

Only a few results reported so far by the SMTP specialists can be mentioned here. The richest<br />

single source <strong>of</strong> new additions to the Swedish insect fauna are the Phoridae (Diptera). The<br />

most recent tally <strong>of</strong> the megadiverse phorid genus Megaselia resulted in 800 morphospecies<br />

in the SMTP material, 523 <strong>of</strong> which are new to science. Highlights from the Hymenoptera<br />

include the reports <strong>of</strong> the ichneumonids Cladeutes discedens (Tryphoninae; genus new to<br />

Sweden), Diacritus aciculatus (Diacritinae; subfamily new to Sweden), and Micromonodon<br />

tener (Cryptinae; genus new to Sweden). Seventeen new species <strong>of</strong> the Meteorinae (Hym.:<br />

Braconidae), sixteen <strong>of</strong> which were undescribed, are discovered. In the Diplazontinae (Hym.:<br />

Ichneumonidae), 19 new species have been recorded from Sweden so far, four or five <strong>of</strong><br />

which are new to science. In the Ichneumoninae, 28 new Swedish species have been recorded<br />

with 10 – 20 more expected. Five new Cheloninae (Braconidae) from Sweden and seven new<br />

Platygastridae for science are also reported.<br />

But even if these rapports are impressive, they are based just upon a fraction <strong>of</strong> the collected<br />

insects. About 300 people have hitherto contributed in one way or the other to the project. Our<br />

guess is that when the project is done in the future, there will be maybe 300 more. Are you<br />

one <strong>of</strong> them?<br />

____________________________________<br />

Field observations on the defense and hunting behaviour <strong>of</strong> Pompilidae species<br />

(Hymenoptera: Insecta)<br />

Mehmet Ali Kirpik<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Biology, Kafkas University, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Science and Letters, 36100 Kars-Turkey;<br />

kirpik80@hotmail.com<br />

This study was conducted at 8 sites determined in the south-west <strong>of</strong> Kars rural are between<br />

2005 and 2008. During the study which was conducted between 9 am and 6 pm in a day,<br />

90


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

female members <strong>of</strong> Anoplius viaticus (Linnaeus 1758) <strong>of</strong> Pompilidae family, which were<br />

caught at the sites marked with GPS, were marked and its hunting success, refinding the prey<br />

that was lost, and the number <strong>of</strong> nests dug on a daily basis were examined. The study has<br />

found out that, female members <strong>of</strong> pompilids Asilidae (Diptera: Insecta) family attacked<br />

directly, whereas the members <strong>of</strong> Formica rufa Linnaeus,1761 attacked indirectly to<br />

pompilids. Obtained information is new about pompilids.<br />

____________________________________<br />

A review <strong>of</strong> the wasp genus Lyroda from Thailand (Hymenoptera: Apoidea)<br />

Lukas Kirschey 1 * & Michael Ohl 2<br />

Museum für Naturkunde Leibniz-Institut für Evolutions- und Biodiversitätsforschung an der Humbold-<br />

Univerität zu Berlin, Invalidenstrasse 43, D-10115 Berlin, Germany;<br />

1 lukas.kirschey@mfn-berlin.de; 2 michael.ohl@mfn-berlin.de<br />

The apoid wasp genus Lyroda belongs in the Miscophini and comprises 25 described species<br />

from all regions yet. Typical Lyroda are inconspicuous, mostly black wasps. Previously only<br />

one species was known to occur in Thailand. A large number <strong>of</strong> Lyroda from Thailand<br />

recently collected by the Thailand Inventory Group for Entomological Research (TIGER)<br />

gives us the possibility to re-examine the diversity <strong>of</strong> Lyroda in Thailand and neighbouring<br />

countries. At least ten undescribed species were found among the TIGER specimens. On the<br />

basis <strong>of</strong> external morphological characters, the new species were compared with already<br />

described species and with the relevant literature.<br />

____________________________________<br />

The evolution <strong>of</strong> antennal courtship in parasitoid wasps <strong>of</strong> the subfamily Diplazontinae<br />

(Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae)<br />

Seraina Klopfstein 1,2* , Donald Quicke 3 & Christian Kropf 1<br />

1 Naturhistorisches Museum Bern, 2 Universität Bern, Switzerland; klopfstein@nmbe.ch;<br />

christian.kropf@nmbe.ch<br />

3 Imperial College London, UK; d.quicke@imperial.ac.uk<br />

Because <strong>of</strong> their potential to cause reproductive isolation, characters associated with courtship<br />

behaviour are believed to play an important role in the diversification <strong>of</strong> life. In the speciesrich<br />

insect order Hymenoptera, the use <strong>of</strong> the antennae during courtship is very widespread,<br />

but the reconstruction <strong>of</strong> its evolutionary history is obstructed by the lack <strong>of</strong> courtship data for<br />

most species.<br />

Recently, we reported a new mode <strong>of</strong> antennal courtship in the parasitoid wasp Syrphoctonus<br />

tarsatorius where the male curls its antennae in double-coils around the antennae <strong>of</strong> the<br />

female. We developed a method to reproduce this movement in amputated antennae which<br />

allows retrieving information about antennal courtship from museum specimens. Applying<br />

this method to the parasitoid subfamily Diplazontinae, we obtain courtship data for 40<br />

species. To reconstruct the evolution <strong>of</strong> antennal courtship in diplazontines, we compiled a<br />

molecular phylogeny based on two mitochondrial and two nuclear genes. With one exception,<br />

the resulting phylogeny confirms the current genus-level classification. Mapping the mode <strong>of</strong><br />

antennal courtship on the phylogeny, we found that the mode <strong>of</strong> antennal coiling is tightly<br />

linked to the position <strong>of</strong> antennal structures connected to internal glands. Moreover, a single<br />

origin is most probable for both single- and double-coiling, and coiling has been lost on three<br />

separate occasions. These results suggest a low speed <strong>of</strong> evolution <strong>of</strong> this character and<br />

91


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

contradict the hypothesis that antennal coiling had a major impact on the diversification <strong>of</strong><br />

this subfamily.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Trophical links <strong>of</strong> Bumblebees (Hymenoptera: Apidae, Bombus)<br />

in Vologda Region <strong>of</strong> Russia<br />

Natalia S. Kolesova<br />

Vologda State Pedagogical University, Vologda, 160034 Russia; nbalukova@yandex.ru<br />

There is a great species variety <strong>of</strong> vascular plants in Vologda Region: 1706 species <strong>of</strong><br />

vascular plants are reckoned among 137 families. About 36% <strong>of</strong> them are entomophilous<br />

plants. The study <strong>of</strong> trophical links was carried out in 2001–2009. 4487 visits <strong>of</strong> 121 species<br />

<strong>of</strong> entomophilous plants reckoned among 36 families made by bumblebees were registered.<br />

The most numerous family in Vologda Region – Asteraceae – is the most frequently visited<br />

one, it was registered that its 26 species were visited by 28 species <strong>of</strong> bumblebees. We<br />

registered that 25 species <strong>of</strong> bumblebees visited 13 species <strong>of</strong> Fabaceae, 25 – 2 Dipsacaceae,<br />

19 – 2 Onagraceae, 18 – 13 Rosaceae, 18 – 5 Scrophulariaceae, 16 – 12 Lamiaceae,<br />

respectively. Centaurea pseudophrygia (Asteraceae) and Knautia arvensis (Dipsacaceae) are<br />

the most frequently visited species <strong>of</strong> plants visited by 25 species <strong>of</strong> bumblebees each. 22<br />

species <strong>of</strong> bumblebees were registered on Vicia cracca (Fabaceae), 20 – Trifolium pratense<br />

(Fabaceae), 19 – Chamaenerion angustifolium (Onagraceae), 16 – Cirsium arvense<br />

(Asteraceae), 15 – Carduus crispus (Asteraceae), 15 – Rhinanthus minor (Scrophulariaceae),<br />

respectively. The attractiveness index shows these plants are the most attractive for all species<br />

<strong>of</strong> bumblebees including rare ones.<br />

The analysis <strong>of</strong> the spectrum <strong>of</strong> plants which are visited by bumblebees proved that the widest<br />

spectrum (31–52 species) is typical for 7 most numerous species <strong>of</strong> the region (out <strong>of</strong> 23<br />

species <strong>of</strong> the regional species <strong>of</strong> bumblebees): B. hypnorum, B. hortorum, B. lapidarius, B.<br />

lucorum, B. pascuorum, B. ruderarius and B. terrestris.<br />

The analysis <strong>of</strong> the preference <strong>of</strong> the certain bumblebees to the prevailing species <strong>of</strong> plants<br />

shows that B. pratorum and B. hypnorum prefer Chamaenerion angustifolium, B. hortorum –<br />

Trifolium pratense, B. ruderarius – Vicia cracca, B. pascuorum and B. veteranus – Trifolium<br />

pratense and Vicia cracca, B. lucorum – Vicia cracca, respectively.<br />

Among 30 most frequently visited species <strong>of</strong> plants 23 species (77%) have a corolla <strong>of</strong> pinkviolet<br />

range <strong>of</strong> colour, 6 species (20%) – yellow and 1 species – white. It is connected with<br />

the trichromatic system <strong>of</strong> colour vision <strong>of</strong> bumblebees.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Taxonomy <strong>of</strong> the genus Eurypterna with biological notes on E. cremieri<br />

(Ichneumonidae, Hybrizontinae)<br />

Kazuhiko Konishi<br />

National Agricultural Research Center for Hokkaido Region, Japan; konishi@affrc.go.jp<br />

The genus Eurypterna is known from three species, cremieri (de Romand, 1838) from Europe<br />

and Japan, rufiventris Tobias, 1988 and angustifacialis Tobias, 1988 from Primorskiy Terr.,<br />

Russia. They are relatively large in body size (more than 1 cm) and rarely collected. For<br />

distinguishing these three species, the following characters have been used: Ratio <strong>of</strong> width<br />

92


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

and height <strong>of</strong> face; ratio <strong>of</strong> lengths <strong>of</strong> hind basitarsus and remainder <strong>of</strong> hind tarsus; body<br />

color; color <strong>of</strong> hind leg.<br />

In October, 2008, many individuals <strong>of</strong> E. cremieri were found flying around an old tree,<br />

Juglans mandshurica var. sieboldiana, in Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan. A colony <strong>of</strong> Lasius<br />

nipponensis Forel, 1912 was exist in the trunk <strong>of</strong> the tree and an ant runway was formed from<br />

a hole on the trunk to the ground about 1.4 m long. The females <strong>of</strong> cremieri were hovering<br />

over the ant runway and the males were flying around the tree. Copulation and newly<br />

emerged adults escaping from the colony through the hole on trunk were observed. In October<br />

2009, oviposition was also observed at the same site.<br />

In total, 17 females and 42 males <strong>of</strong> E. cremieri were collected there in 2008 and 2009.<br />

Examined these specimens, it was revealed that the characters which have been used to<br />

distinguish species, such as the ratio <strong>of</strong> width and length <strong>of</strong> the face and the ratio <strong>of</strong> length <strong>of</strong><br />

hind basitarsus and remainder <strong>of</strong> hind tarsus, are only the differences between female and<br />

male. Moreover, the male holotype <strong>of</strong> rufiventris, the female holotype <strong>of</strong> angustifacialis and<br />

some additional specimens <strong>of</strong> cremieri were examined. As the result, it was concluded that<br />

angustifacialis should be synonymized with cremieri.<br />

The biology <strong>of</strong> E. cremieri was revealed as follows by the observation from October 2008 to<br />

October 2009. In October, the host ant workers carry their larvae from the colony in tree trunk<br />

to the colony under ground. The female <strong>of</strong> cremieri hovers above the ant runway and when<br />

she finds a worker carrying a larva, she attacks it and lays one egg into the larva. In May, the<br />

ant workers carry their larvae from the ground to the tree trunk colony. And, newly emerged<br />

adults <strong>of</strong> cremieri escape from the colony in tree trunk from late September to October. Thus,<br />

the parasitoid is considered to grow in the colony in tree trunk. It is a mystery how this<br />

parasitoid grows up to such a big size, because the parasitoid is more than twice as long as its<br />

host in body length.<br />

____________________________________<br />

The separation <strong>of</strong> cereal aphid parasitoids, Aphidius rhopalosiphi, A. uzbekistanicus and<br />

A. avenaphis (Hymenoptera: Aphidiinae), using mt-DNA (COI) sequences<br />

Katarina Kos 1 *, Željko Tomanovi 2 , Andjeljko Petrovi 3 , Jernej Jakše 1 & Stanislav Trdan 1<br />

1 University <strong>of</strong> Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty, Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, Jamnikarjeva 101, SI-1111 Ljubljana,<br />

Slovenia; katarina.kos@bf.uni-lj.si<br />

2 University <strong>of</strong> Belgrade, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Biology, Institute <strong>of</strong> Zoology, Studentski Trg 16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia<br />

3 Institute for Plant Protection and Environment, Department <strong>of</strong> Plant Pests, Banatska 33, 11080 Belgrade, Serbia<br />

Aphidius rhopalosiphi De Stefani and Aphidius uzbekistanicus Luzhetzki are a key solitary<br />

endoparasitoid species parasitizing cereal aphids in the West Palaearctic. Owing to similarity<br />

<strong>of</strong> morphological characters and a similar host range pattern where cereal aphids are<br />

concerned, the identification <strong>of</strong> these two species has shown to be very difficult. In the present<br />

study, we analyzed phylogenetic relationships <strong>of</strong> two close related Aphidius species, A.<br />

rhopalosiphi and A. uzbekistanicus on the basis <strong>of</strong> sequence information <strong>of</strong> a fragment <strong>of</strong> the<br />

mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) gene. Individuals were obtained from 12<br />

countries (Slovenia, Slovakia, Hungary, Serbia, Germany, Sweden, Poland, Czech Republic,<br />

Montenegro, Iran, Pakistan, and USA) with known hosts and host plants. The purpose <strong>of</strong> our<br />

research was to confirm the presence distinct species on the basis <strong>of</strong> preliminary<br />

morphological determined characters, followed by molecular analysis. The value <strong>of</strong> molecular<br />

techniques in the identification <strong>of</strong> closely-related parasitoid species is discussed.<br />

____________________________________<br />

93


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Rare giants – A review <strong>of</strong> Lept<strong>of</strong>oeninae (Chalcidoidea: Pteromalidae) and discovery <strong>of</strong><br />

the first Doddifoenus from Indomalaya<br />

Lars Krogmann 1* & Roger A. Burks 2<br />

1 Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart, Germany; krogmann.smns@naturkundemuseum-bw.de<br />

2 University <strong>of</strong> California, Riverside, USA; burks.roger@gmail.com<br />

Lept<strong>of</strong>oeninae is one <strong>of</strong> the smallest and least known <strong>of</strong> the 31 subfamilies <strong>of</strong> Pteromalidae<br />

(Chalcidoidea) recognized by Noyes (2010). Members <strong>of</strong> this subfamily are very rarely<br />

collected but morphologically are <strong>of</strong> special interest because <strong>of</strong> their very large body size and<br />

a number <strong>of</strong> character states that are uncommon in Chalcidoidea. Lept<strong>of</strong>oeninae comprises<br />

only two genera, Doddifoenus Bouek and Lept<strong>of</strong>oenus Smith (Noyes 2010). Lept<strong>of</strong>oenus<br />

Smith contains five extant species and is restricted to the New World. The first fossil species<br />

<strong>of</strong> Lept<strong>of</strong>oenus was recently described from Dominican amber dating back the age <strong>of</strong> the<br />

genus at least to the early Miocene. The genus Doddifoenus Bouek previously included two<br />

species restricted to Australasia (Papua New Guinea and Northeastern Australia). Here we<br />

present a remarkable new species <strong>of</strong> Doddifoenus, which was just recently described from<br />

Thailand and Laos (Krogmann & Burks 2009). Doddifoenus wallaci is the first species <strong>of</strong> the<br />

genus occurring west <strong>of</strong> Wallace’s Line, and one <strong>of</strong> the longest known chalcidoid wasps. All<br />

specimens <strong>of</strong> D. wallacei were collected from naturally fallen trees in primary tropical<br />

rainforests. No host records are known for Doddifoenus or any other Lept<strong>of</strong>oeninae, but they<br />

are presumed to be parasitoids <strong>of</strong> wood-boring insects. Results from a detailed anatomical<br />

study <strong>of</strong> the mesosomal skeleton <strong>of</strong> Doddifoenus are presented and compared with characters<br />

analyzed previously (Krogmann & Vilhelmsen 2006) for Pteromalinae, Cleonyminae and<br />

other Chalcidoidea. The metafurcal arms in Doddifoenus are basally fused, like in some<br />

Cleonyminae, but are always separated in Pteromalinae. This may indicate a plesiomorphic<br />

condition in Doddifoenus and some Cleonyminae relative to the condition in Pteromalinae.<br />

Other metafurcal characters <strong>of</strong> Doddifoenus are highly derived, like the complete fusion<br />

between metafurcal arms and metapleural apodemes, which has not been found in any other<br />

chalcidoid species. The phylogenetic relationships between Lept<strong>of</strong>oeninae and the other<br />

pteromalid subfamilies remains an open question that needs to be addressed by a broad<br />

phylogenetic analysis.<br />

References<br />

Engel, M.S. (2009) The first fossil lept<strong>of</strong>oenine wasp (Hymenoptera, Pteromalidae): A new<br />

species <strong>of</strong> Lept<strong>of</strong>oenus in Miocene amber from the Dominican Republic. ZooKeys 13: 57-66.<br />

Krogmann, L. & Vilhelmsen, L. (2006) Phylogenetic implications <strong>of</strong> the mesosomal<br />

skeleton in Chalcidoidea (Hymenoptera: Apocrita) – Tree searches in a jungle <strong>of</strong> homoplasy.<br />

Invertebrate Systematics 20: 615-674.<br />

Krogmann, L. & Burks, R.A. (2009) Doddifoenus wallacei, a new giant parasitoid<br />

wasp <strong>of</strong> the subfamily Lept<strong>of</strong>oeninae (Chalcidoidea: Pteromalidae), with a description <strong>of</strong> its<br />

mesosomal skeletal anatomy and a molecular characterization. Zootaxa 2194: 21-36.<br />

Noyes, J.S. (2010) Universal Chalcidoidea Database. World Wide Web electronic publication.<br />

http://www.nhm.ac.uk/research-curation/research/projects/<br />

chalcidoids/ [accessed 30 March 2010].<br />

____________________________________<br />

94


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Contributions to knowledge <strong>of</strong> Pimplinae wasps (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae) from<br />

Brazil<br />

Ana Paula da Silva L<strong>of</strong>fredo 1 *, Angélica Maria Penteado-Dias 1 , Jober Fernando Sobczak 1 &<br />

Marcelo de Oliveira Gonzaga 2<br />

1 Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, SP, Brazil; ap_l<strong>of</strong>fredo@yahoo.com.br<br />

2 Universidade Federal de Uberlandia, Uberlandia, MG, Brasil<br />

Pimplinae is the most biologically diverse group <strong>of</strong> Ichneumonidae associated with a wide<br />

range <strong>of</strong> hosts, comprising about 1,500 species, most <strong>of</strong> them ecto- or endoparasitoids <strong>of</strong><br />

holometabolous insects. Hymenoepimecis, Ticapimpla and Schizopyga pertaining to<br />

polysphincta genus-group, formed by 21 genera composed exclusively by koinobiont<br />

ectoparasitoids <strong>of</strong> spiders. The material was collected from their hosts, using Malaise traps,<br />

sweeping the vegetation and comes in São Paulo, and Bahia, States <strong>of</strong> Brazil. We described<br />

recently five new species <strong>of</strong> Hymenoepimecis from State <strong>of</strong> São Paulo: Hymenoepimecis<br />

silvanae, Hymenoepimecis jordanensis, Hymenoepimecis veranii, Hymenoepimecis japi,<br />

Hymenoepimecis sooretama. Hymenoepimecis veranii, was observed attacking and laying<br />

eggs on spiders Araneus omnicolor (Araneidae). After the attack, these parasitoids allow the<br />

hosts to continue their normal activities and the larvae do not kill or consume the hosts until<br />

they have pupate. Hymenoepimecis japi specimens were collected parasitizing females <strong>of</strong><br />

spider Leucauge roseosignata (Tetragnathidae), Hymenoepimecis sooretama attached to the<br />

webs <strong>of</strong> spider Manogea porracea (Araneidae); the cocoon webs <strong>of</strong> host species are distinct<br />

from their normal webs. One female <strong>of</strong> Ticapimpla vilmae was obtained from Malaise trap,<br />

from Mata da Esperança in Ilhéus, State <strong>of</strong> Bahia, Brazil, 0-200 m <strong>of</strong> altitude. The specimen<br />

studied, presented some variation in coloration: the hind tibia more extensive blackish, as well<br />

the last two tergites <strong>of</strong> metasoma. Two females <strong>of</strong> Schizopyga moreirae were obtained from<br />

São Paulo State, Brazil, at 600 and 1200 m, using Malaise traps. This is the first record <strong>of</strong><br />

Schizopyga from Brazil and a new species was described. All the material is deposited in the<br />

collection (DCBU) <strong>of</strong> Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Departamento de Ecologia e<br />

Biologia Evolutiva, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.<br />

Financial support: FAPESP (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo) CNPq<br />

(Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico), CAPES (Coordenação de<br />

Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior), INCT/ HYMPAR- Sudeste (Instituto<br />

Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia dos Hymenoptera Parasitóides da Região Sudeste<br />

Brasileira).<br />

____________________________________<br />

TIGER wasps – a preliminary review <strong>of</strong> the apoid wasp diversity in Thailand<br />

Volker Lohrmann 1 *, Lukas Kirschey 2 , Stefanie Krause 3 , Meike Schulze 4 & Michael Ohl 5<br />

Museum für Naturkunde, Leibniz-Institut für Evolutions- und Biodiversitätsforschung an der Humboldt-<br />

Universität zu Berlin, Invalidenstraße 43, D-10115 Berlin, Germany;<br />

1 volker.lohrmann@mfn-berlin.de, 2 lukas.kirschey@mfn-berlin.de, 3 stefanie.krause@mfn-berlin.de, 4 meikeschulze@web.de,<br />

5 michael.ohl@mfn-berlin.de<br />

Thailand is one <strong>of</strong> the countries in Southeast Asia with a remarkably rich but fragmentarily<br />

known insect diversity. Since its beginning in 2006, the Thailand biodiversity inventory,<br />

known as TIGER project, has resulted in about 5000 specimens <strong>of</strong> apoid wasps. Here we<br />

compare the preliminary results <strong>of</strong> our taxonomic analysis <strong>of</strong> this large sample with the<br />

published species diversity in Thailand. Until now, 155 species have been explicitly recorded<br />

95


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

from Thailand, representing 42 genera, but more than 500 species in 55 genera from Thailand<br />

including neighboring countries. The species diversity is rather unevenly divided between the<br />

genera. Numerous genera are represented by a single species each, whereas a few markedly<br />

diverse genera comprise the majority <strong>of</strong> species. Highly diverse genera like Trypoxylon (about<br />

100 species known from the area) and Psenulus (about 50 species known) are not only diverse<br />

in terms <strong>of</strong> species numbers, but are also markedly abundant in the TIGER material. As an<br />

example, about 30% (more than 1500 specimens) <strong>of</strong> the TIGER specimens studied so far<br />

belong in Trypoxylon, representing a still unknown number <strong>of</strong> species. Not surprisingly, the<br />

portion <strong>of</strong> stem-nesting species among the TIGER material is markedly large, as is well<br />

known from other tropical habitats. This bias towards stem-nesting is also reflected in the<br />

small average body size, although this might partially be the result <strong>of</strong> the collecting method,<br />

since smaller species are more likely collected by Malaise traps than large species. We also<br />

found a large number <strong>of</strong> hitherto undescribed species. Such newly found species are more<br />

common in genera with smaller species, which are more likely to be overlooked without<br />

Malaise traps and other mass collecting methods. However, even among the largest sphecids<br />

from Thailand, which are members <strong>of</strong> the genus Sphex, we found undescribed species. As far<br />

as we can tell now, the total number <strong>of</strong> species and genera among the TIGER material will<br />

approach the total number <strong>of</strong> apoid wasp species and genera already recorded from Thailand,<br />

although we predict significant differences in the specific species composition. Of the 55<br />

genera reported from Thailand and its neighbouring countries, only 41 genera have been<br />

found in the TIGER samples so far. However, additional 14+ genera found by us have not<br />

been reported from this geographical region before. This increases the total number <strong>of</strong> known<br />

genera from Thailand by 30%. Although there are still many taxonomic problems to be<br />

solved, particularly in the highly diverse genera like Trypoxylon, it already became clear that<br />

the TIGER project significantly contributes to the knowledge <strong>of</strong> the wasp diversity in<br />

Thailand, with many implications for Southeast Asia.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Hymenopterous parasitoids <strong>of</strong> safflower fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Iran<br />

Hosseinali Lotfalizadeh* & Mohammad-Hossein Kazemi<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Plant Protection, College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz Branch, Tabriz, Iran;<br />

lotfalizadeh2001@yahoo.com<br />

The fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) are the serious pests <strong>of</strong> safflower fields in Iran.<br />

Associated hymenopterous parasitoids (Hymenoptera) <strong>of</strong> them including nine species were<br />

listed and related data presented. They belong to the families Braconidae, Eulophidae,<br />

Ormyridae, Pteromalidae and Torymidae. Pronotalia carlinarum (Szelényi & Erdös)<br />

(Eulophidae) and Pteromalus albipennis Walker (Pteromalidae) were recorded for first time<br />

from Iran. Some descriptive and biological remarks are given on parasitoids. An illustrated<br />

identification key was provided for these species.<br />

____________________________________<br />

The first braconid species record <strong>of</strong> subfamily Charmontinae from Iran:<br />

Charmon extensor (L.) (Hym., Braconidae: Charmontinae)<br />

Ashkan Masnady-Yazdinejad<br />

Insect Taxonomy Research Department, Iranian Research Institute <strong>of</strong> Plant Protection, Tehran, POBox:<br />

153951454 Iran; masnadi@iripp.ir; amsnadi@yahoo.com<br />

96


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

During the study <strong>of</strong> natural enemies in apple orchards <strong>of</strong> Iran, one braconid species <strong>of</strong> the<br />

subfamily Charmontinae was collected and identified. This is the first record <strong>of</strong> this subfamily<br />

in Iran. Charmontinae with two genera Charmon and Charmontia is a worldwide subfamily<br />

and the species <strong>of</strong> these genera known as parasitoids <strong>of</strong> lepidopterous larvae. The apple<br />

orchard which in this braconid species was collected, was heavily infected by Grapholita<br />

molesta (Busck) (Lep., Tortricidae). It is Charmon extensor (Linnaeus, 1758), a new record<br />

for Iran. Disribution: Eastern Palaearctic, Europe, Nearctic, Neotropical, Oriental and<br />

Ethiopian Regions, and Western Palaearctic. Material examined: West Azarbaijan, Orumiyeh,<br />

23.7.2009. Leg. A. Masnadi-Yazdinejad.<br />

____________________________________<br />

The ichneumonid parasitoids (Hym., Ichneumonidae) <strong>of</strong> Yponomeuta malinellus Zeller<br />

(Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae) in Iran<br />

Ashkan Masnady-Yazdinejad<br />

Insect Taxonomy Research Department, Iranian Research Institute <strong>of</strong> Plant Protection, Tehran, POBox:<br />

153951454 Iran; masnadi@iripp.ir; amsnadi@yahoo.com<br />

The apple ermine moth, Yponomeuta malinellus Zeller, 1838 (Lep.: Yponomeutidae), is one<br />

<strong>of</strong> the most serious pest <strong>of</strong> the apple orchards and widely distributed throughout the temperate<br />

regions <strong>of</strong> the Palaearctic region. This univoltine defoliator <strong>of</strong> apple trees has some<br />

hymenopterous parasitoids, most important <strong>of</strong> which belong to the family Ichneumonidae.<br />

During the study <strong>of</strong> natural enemies <strong>of</strong> apple ermine moth in apple orchards <strong>of</strong> Iran, 9<br />

ichneumonid species from five subfamilies (Campopleginae , Pimplinae, Ichneumoninae,<br />

Cryptinae and Anomaloninae) were collected and identified, 2 species <strong>of</strong> which (marked with<br />

two asterisks) are newly recorded for Iran, and 3 species (marked with an asterisk) are<br />

recorded for the first time as ichneumonid parasitoids <strong>of</strong> Y. malinellus in Iran. The next<br />

parasitoid species were reared from Y. malinellus in Iran:<br />

Campopleginae. Campoletis ensator (Gravenhorst, 1829). Earlier recorded from Iran<br />

(Davachi & Shojaei 1968). Material examined: Ardabil, 31.4.2009, Leg. A. Masnadi-<br />

Yazdinejad. *Diadegma armillata (Gravenhorst, 1829). Earlier recorded from Iran (Masnadi-<br />

Yazdinejad et al. in press). Material examined: West Azarbaijan, Orumiyeh, 24.7.2009. Leg.<br />

A. Masnadi-Yazdinejad.<br />

Pimplinae. Itoplectis tunetana (Schmiedeknecht, 1914). Earlier recorded from Iran (Aubert<br />

1969). Material examined: Tehran, Karaj. 11.6.2009. Leg. A. Masnadi-Yazdinejad. Pimpla<br />

turionellae (Linnaeus, 1758). Earlier recorded from Iran (Kasparyan 1974). Material<br />

examined: Azarbayejan-e sharghi, Tabriz. 12.9.2009, Leg. A.Masnadi-Yazdinejad. *Pimpla<br />

contemplator (Muller, 1776). Earlier recorded from Iran (Kolarove & Ghahari 2006). Material<br />

examined: Tehran, Varamin. 14.7 2009. Leg. A. Masnadi-Yazdinejad. *Gregopimpla<br />

inquisitor (Scopoli, 1763). Earlier recorded from Iran (Masnadi-Yazdinejad & Jussila 2008).<br />

Material examined: Fars, Samirom, 11.8.2009. Leg. A.Masnadi-Yazdinejad.<br />

Ichneumoninae. *Herpestomus brunnicornis (Gravenhorst, 1829). Earlier recorded from Iran<br />

(Masnadi-Yazdinejad & Jussila 2008). Material examined: Fars, Goyom, 27.2.2010. Leg. M.<br />

Hooshmand.<br />

Cryptinae. **Gelis agilis (Fabricius, 1775). New record for Iran. Material examined: Fars,<br />

Ghasrodashat, 6.8.2009. Leg. K. Abootorabi.<br />

Anomaloninae. **Agrypon flavelatum (Gravenhorst, 1829). New record for Iran. Material<br />

examined: Mashhad, 11.6.2009. Leg. A. Abbasi.<br />

____________________________________<br />

97


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Two newly recorded ichneumonid species as parasitoid wasp <strong>of</strong> Codling Moth (Cydia<br />

pomonella L. (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) from Iran<br />

Ashkan Masnady-Yazdinejad<br />

Insect Taxonomy Research Department, Iranian Research Institute <strong>of</strong> Plant Protection, Tehran, POBox:<br />

153951454 Iran; masnadi@iripp.ir; amsnadi@yahoo.com<br />

Codling moth (Cydia pomonella Linneaus, 1758) is a serious pest <strong>of</strong> pear and apple orchards.<br />

Two ichneumonid parasitoid species from Cremastinae and Pimplinae were reared and<br />

identified from the material collected in Iran. This is the first record <strong>of</strong> these two species for<br />

the Iranian fauna as well as a new record <strong>of</strong> the parasitoid <strong>of</strong> Cydia pomonella L in Iran.<br />

Cremastinae. Pristomerus armatus (Lucas, 1849). New record for Iran. Material examined:<br />

Fars, Eghlid, 10.6.2009. Leg. A. Abdollahi.<br />

Pimplinae. Dolichomitus messor (Gravenhorst, 1829). New record for Iran. Material<br />

examined: Fars, Shiraz, 11.9.2009. Leg. A.Masnadi-Yazdinejad.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Comparison <strong>of</strong> parasitoid communities between insular and mainland populations <strong>of</strong><br />

Pseudasphondylia neolitseae (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) in the Izu district, Japan<br />

Kazunori Matsuo 1 *, Makoto Tokuda 2 , Keizi Kiritani 3 , Misako Mishima 4 & Junichi Yukawa 5<br />

1 Entomological Laboratory, Graduate School <strong>of</strong> Bioresource and Bioenvironmental Sciences, Kyushu<br />

University, Fukuoka 812-8581, Japan; k_matsuo@agr.kyushu-u.ac.jp<br />

2 Center for Research and Advancement in Higher Education, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan<br />

3 Futo, Ito, Shizuoka 413-0231, Japan<br />

4 Kyushu University Museum, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8581, Japan<br />

5 Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8581, Japan<br />

The Izu Islands consist <strong>of</strong> volcanic islands located south <strong>of</strong> the Izu Peninsula, Honshu, Japan,<br />

extending for about 230 km from north to south, and have unique biota <strong>of</strong> insects, terrestrial<br />

reptiles and plants. In 2009 and 2010, we surveyed gall midge populations and associated<br />

parasitoids in these areas. Parasitoid communities were compared among different islands and<br />

the Izu Peninsula for Pseudasphondylia neolitseae that induces leaf galls on Neolitsea sericea<br />

(Lauraceae) and some other gall midges <strong>of</strong> Asphondyliini (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) In 2009,<br />

two hymenopteran ectoparasitoids, Bracon tamabae (Braconidae) and Sigmophora sp.<br />

(Eulophidae), and one endoparasitoid, Gastrancistrus sp. (Pteromalidae), were observed to<br />

attack P. neolitseae in the Izu Peninsula and on northern islands. On southern islands such as<br />

Miyake and Hachijo Islands, only B. tamabae was found. B. tamabae is polyphagous and has<br />

a very long adult life span (up to three months). In contrast, the Gastrancistrus sp. is<br />

monophagous and has a relatively short adult life span. Because <strong>of</strong> such differences, B.<br />

tamabae might be able to colonize these islands easier than Gastrancistrus sp. At the moment,<br />

reasons why Sigmophora sp. is not distributed on southern islands are not known. Molecular<br />

analysis in 2009 revealed that B. tamabae has a mitochondrial DNA haplotype that is<br />

common among populations through out localities surveyed except the most southern and<br />

distant island, Hachijo, where another haplotype exists. In contrast, P. neolitseae has a<br />

common mitochondrial DNA haplotype in all localities surveyed including Hachijo Island.<br />

This suggests that the Hachijo population <strong>of</strong> B. tamabae has derived from a place that is<br />

different from distribution range <strong>of</strong> P. neolitseae in the Izu Peninsula and northern Izu<br />

Islands. In addition to P. neolitseae, parasitoid communities <strong>of</strong> the following gall midge<br />

98


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

species were surveyed: Asteralobia sasakii inducing axillary bud galls on Ilex crenata<br />

(Aquifoliaceae) and Illiciomyia yukawai inducing leaf galls on Illicium anisatum (Illiciaceae).<br />

____________________________________<br />

Systematics and diversity <strong>of</strong> oak gallwasps (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae: Cynipini)<br />

<strong>of</strong> Panama<br />

Enrique Medianero 1 & José Luis Nieves-Aldrey 2*<br />

1 Programa Centroamericano de Maestría en Entomología, Vicerectoría de Investigación y Postgrado,<br />

Universidad de Panamá, C.P. 0824 Panamá; emedianero@ancon.up.ac.pa<br />

2 Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC), Dpto. Biodiversidad. C/José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, 28006<br />

Madrid, Spain; aldrey@mncn.csic.es<br />

The great part <strong>of</strong> the representatives <strong>of</strong> the family Cynipidae are grouped within the tribe<br />

Cynipini or oak gallwasps. There are about 1000 described species distributed mainly across<br />

the Holarctic Region. From the Neotropical region only 13 Cynipini species have been<br />

recorded, although actual evidence is how that the group could also be species rich and<br />

phylogenetically diverse in the neotropics. The aim <strong>of</strong> this work was to perform a taxonomical<br />

and biological study <strong>of</strong> the gall-inducing Cynipini on Quercus <strong>of</strong> Panama, where only one<br />

species was previously recorded. Field data were taken from samplings made between<br />

December 2007 and May 2009 in nineteen sites <strong>of</strong> the western <strong>of</strong> Panama. Eight <strong>of</strong> the nine<br />

Quercus species recorded in this country were surveyed monthly: Q. salicifolia, Q. benthamii,<br />

Q. cortesii, Q. gulielmi-treleasei, Q. humboldtii, Q. bumelioides, Q. lancifolia and Q. insignis.<br />

The preliminary identification found 10 genera <strong>of</strong> the tribe Cynipini. Sixty three morphotypes<br />

<strong>of</strong> galls induced by cynipids associated with six species <strong>of</strong> Quercus were collected, 53% <strong>of</strong><br />

the galls were found on leaves, 37% on stems, 4% on acorns, 4% on buds and 1% on catkins.<br />

Adult gall-inducers were reared from 43 gall morphotypes (68% <strong>of</strong> total) <strong>of</strong> whom 25%<br />

corresponded to a sexual generation. One new genus <strong>of</strong> oak gall wasp has been detected and it<br />

is being studied. The identified genera and its species-richness were: Amphibolips Reinhard (3<br />

species), Andricus Hartig (12 species), Bassettia Ashmead (1), Callirhytis Frster (1), Cynips<br />

Linnaeus (4), Disholcaspis Dalla Torre & Kieffer (2), Loxaulus Mayr (1 specie), Neuroterus<br />

Hartig (8 ), Odontocynips Kieffer (2) and Trigonaspis Hartig (8). Only two species previously<br />

recorded from the Neotropical region were identified (Andricus championi Cameron and<br />

Odontocynips hansoni Pujade-Villar). The other 95% <strong>of</strong> the studied species represent new<br />

undescribed species. The Quercus species with the greatest diversity <strong>of</strong> galls was Quercus<br />

bumelioides (Sect. Quercus), with 33 different galls associated. On the distribution <strong>of</strong><br />

Cynipidae in Panama, the preliminary results showed a high Cynipini species richness (but in<br />

low densities), concentrated in several species <strong>of</strong> Quercus relatively extended in areas <strong>of</strong> the<br />

western <strong>of</strong> Panama, while that presence <strong>of</strong> cynipids in others Quercus species, more scarcely<br />

or locally distributed, was almost null.<br />

____________________________________<br />

A preliminary study on the gallwasp fauna <strong>of</strong> Kemaliye (Turkey), with a new record for<br />

Turkey (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae)<br />

Özlem Mete* & A. Demirsoy<br />

Hacettepe University, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Science, Department <strong>of</strong> Biology, 06800 Beytepe, Ankara, Turkey;<br />

ozlemmete83@gmail.com<br />

99


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

The members <strong>of</strong> the Cynipidae (Hymenoptera) family, also known as the gallwasps, induce<br />

some <strong>of</strong> the most structurally complex plant galls. In this study, we have examined the<br />

gallwasps and their galls collected from Kemaliye (Turkey) and its surrounding. Kemaliye is<br />

located on the Anatolian Diagonal which separates the Eastern and Western parts <strong>of</strong> Turkey<br />

by a certain division, and therefore has a very interesting topography and plant composition<br />

which combines various faunistic and floristic components <strong>of</strong> Anatolia (such as<br />

Mediterranean, Pontic, Eucsin, Turano-Eremial, Alpine and even African). In this study<br />

which was carried out in Kemaliye and its surrounding, it was aimed to contribute to the<br />

further studies concerning this subject. Field trips were made on September and November <strong>of</strong><br />

2007 and May, June, July, September and October <strong>of</strong> 2008. During the field trips, gall<br />

specimens which belong to the family Cynipidae which develop on host plants were collected<br />

from the genus Quercus (Fagaceae) and the species Rosa canina (Rosaceae). At the end <strong>of</strong> the<br />

study, 24 species which belong to 5 genera were determined. Moreover, Andricus moreae was<br />

found to be a new record for Turkey.<br />

____________________________________<br />

A second European species <strong>of</strong> Netomocera Bouek (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae:<br />

Diparinae), with notes on other diparines<br />

Mircea-Dan Mitroiu<br />

Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Biology, Bd. Carol I 20A, 700505 Iasi, Romania;<br />

mircea.mitroiu@uaic.ro<br />

The genus Netomocera was described by Bouek in 1954, having as type species N. setifera<br />

Bouek (orig. design. and monotypy), which is known to occur mainly in south-eastern<br />

Europe. Since then other six species have been described, three Afrotropical, one Nearctic,<br />

one Oriental, and one Australian. Thus, the newly described species is the second one<br />

recorded in Europe; it was collected in southern Romania and it most closely resembles N.<br />

setifera. The submacropterous female can be separated from that <strong>of</strong> setifera mainly by its<br />

longer gaster, the first tergite occupying only half <strong>of</strong> the gaster length, while the macropterous<br />

male in having larger eyes and thinner antennae. Both sexes significantly differ from setifera<br />

in body coloration, especially the males which are partly reddish-yellow and not completely<br />

black. An illustrated key to separate the two species is given, as well as distributional notes on<br />

other diparines.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Calesinae: morphological examination and molecular phylogenetics <strong>of</strong> an enigmatic<br />

chalcidoid taxon<br />

Jason L. Mottern* & John M. Heraty<br />

University <strong>of</strong> California, Riverside, CA, USA; jmott002@student.ucr.edu; john.heraty@ucr.edu<br />

Although the monophyly <strong>of</strong> some groups <strong>of</strong> Chalcidoidea is strongly supported by<br />

morphological and/or molecular synapomorphies, higher-level relationships within the<br />

superfamily remain uncertain. Several families are regarded as either paraphyletic or even<br />

polyphyletic. This uncertainty regarding sister-group relationships, combined with<br />

hyperdiversity <strong>of</strong> form and function, has left some chalcid groups unplaced into higher<br />

taxonomic categories Establishing relationships within Chalcidoidea is further hindered by a<br />

dearth <strong>of</strong> comprehensive morphological studies, either across character systems or across<br />

taxa. Calesinae (Howard) is a small group <strong>of</strong> Australian and Neotropical parasitoids <strong>of</strong><br />

100


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

whiteflies, comprising a single genus, Cales. Historically, the Calesinae have been included<br />

within the Trichogrammatidae and Mymaridae, though they are most <strong>of</strong>ten associated with the<br />

Aphelinidae. In addition, they share some features with the Eulophidae. The subfamily is<br />

currently unplaced within the superfamily Chalcidoidea. Here we present a detailed<br />

morphological examination and a molecular phylogenetic analysis <strong>of</strong> the three described<br />

species in addition to a newly discovered species from New Zealand. The apparently<br />

apomorphic characteristics <strong>of</strong> the head, mouthparts, antennae, wings, mesosoma and genitalia,<br />

are weighed against characteristics suggesting affinities with established chalcidoid families.<br />

In addition, we provide a species-level molecular phylogeny <strong>of</strong> the group, suggesting a<br />

possible cryptic species complex within the new world species, Cales noacki.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Molecular Phylogeny <strong>of</strong> Eucharitidae<br />

Elizabeth Murray*, John M. Heraty, David Hawks & Andrew Carmichael<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, University <strong>of</strong> California Riverside, CA, USA; elizabeth.murray@email.ucr.edu;<br />

john.heraty@ucr.edu<br />

Within Hymenoptera, eucharitids comprise the most numerous and diverse group <strong>of</strong> eusocial<br />

insect parasitoids. Fifty-three genera <strong>of</strong> Eucharitidae are distributed worldwide in nearly every<br />

zoogeographical region. Phylogenetic relationships have previously been analyzed within a<br />

cladistic framework using morphological character coding, genetic markers, and a<br />

concatenated ‘total evidence’ data matrix. Morphology, molecules, and shared life history<br />

traits unite the Eucharitidae as a demonstrably monophyletic group, with three subfamilies:<br />

Gollumiellinae, Oraseminae, and Eucharitinae. However, many lower-level relationships are<br />

unclear and vary according to dataset and analytical method. We present a molecular<br />

phylogeny based on an expanded matrix <strong>of</strong> over 375 taxa from both the Eucharitidae and<br />

Perilampidae. Molecular evidence from a combined-gene dataset (28S-D2-D3, 18S, COI and<br />

COII) is used to assess relationships.<br />

We present an updated hypothesis <strong>of</strong> congruence between host and parasitoid using the most<br />

recent ant phylogenetic relationships. Eucharitidae are known to attack six subfamilies <strong>of</strong><br />

ants, but we focus on the host poneromorph ant subfamilies. Though the host ant patterns are<br />

predictive among the eucharitid groups, there have been a number <strong>of</strong> instances <strong>of</strong><br />

hypothesized host-switching. Evolution <strong>of</strong> ant host associations will be considered in light <strong>of</strong><br />

the new eucharitid phylogeny.<br />

____________________________________<br />

The effects <strong>of</strong> prey abundance on nesting behavior <strong>of</strong> solitary wasp Symmorphus<br />

allobrogus (Hymenoptera: Vespidae: Eumeninae)<br />

Žaneta Nevronyt¹, Eduardas Budrys¹ , ²* & Anna Budrien¹<br />

¹ Nature Research Centre, Akademijos 2, Vilnius LT-08412, Lithuania; ebudrys@ekoi.lt<br />

² Dept. <strong>of</strong> Zoology <strong>of</strong> Vilnius University, M.K.iurlionio 21/27, Vilnius LT-03101, Lithuania<br />

It has been demonstrated that species richness and diversity <strong>of</strong> trap-nesting Hymenoptera<br />

community are sensitive to a wide range <strong>of</strong> human-caused environmental changes, therefore<br />

this community may be considered a potential bioindicator <strong>of</strong> anthropogenous impacts at<br />

habitat or landscape scale. We may expect that, in addition to presence and abundance, some<br />

other parameters like body size, sex ratio and nest size can reflect the effects <strong>of</strong> environmental<br />

changes on the state <strong>of</strong> species populations. The current experimental study aimed to ascertain<br />

101


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

whether progeny size, sex ratio and number <strong>of</strong> cells per nest depend on prey abundance in the<br />

environment and may be used in estimation <strong>of</strong> wasp population state.<br />

We conducted a laboratory experiment with inseminated females <strong>of</strong> Symmorphus allobrogus<br />

– abundant solitary wasp species in Lithuania. Each female were kept in a transparent plastic<br />

5 litre container with food (honey solution), water, nesting places (reed stem internodes) and<br />

material for building cell partitions (clay) available. Wasps were provided with different<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> prey: 5, 10 or 20 specimens <strong>of</strong> leaf-beetle Gonioctena quinquepunctata or<br />

Linaeidea aenea larvae per day. A total <strong>of</strong> 37 wasps were used in the experiment. The content<br />

<strong>of</strong> 154 nests produced during the experiment was examined.<br />

Wasp females responded to a higher amount <strong>of</strong> available prey by building nests with a higher<br />

number <strong>of</strong> brood cells. The wasps that received 20 prey items per day produced<br />

approximately twice as many cells per nest (3.9 ± 0.4) as the wasps receiving 5 prey items per<br />

day (2.1 ± 0.1). The amount <strong>of</strong> available prey did not affect the progeny size: both male and<br />

female progeny had the same average body mass irrespective <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> prey<br />

specimens given to the mother wasp. Results <strong>of</strong> our experiment did not confirm the<br />

hypothesis that a higher availability <strong>of</strong> provision would lead to a higher proportion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

larger (female) sex in the progeny produced by the mother wasp: the proportion <strong>of</strong> female<br />

progeny per nest was approximately equal in the nests produced by wasps receiving 5 and 20<br />

prey items per day. However, the wasps that were provided with 10 prey items per day<br />

produced nests with a significantly lower share <strong>of</strong> female progeny. The reasons <strong>of</strong> such Ushaped<br />

dependence <strong>of</strong> the proportion <strong>of</strong> female progeny in a nest on the amount <strong>of</strong> prey<br />

remain unclear.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Parasitization <strong>of</strong> Tetrastichus brontispae, a potential biological control agent <strong>of</strong> the<br />

coconut hispine beetle Brontispa longissima<br />

Huong Thi Nguyen 1 , Ryoko T. Ichiki 2 , Shun-Ichiro Takano 1,2 & Satoshi Nakamura 1 *<br />

1 Japan <strong>International</strong> Research Centre for Agricultural Sciences, 1-1 Ohwashi, Tsukuba, 305-8686 Japan;<br />

s.nakamura@affrc.go.jp<br />

2 Kyushu Univeristy, 6-10-1 Hakozaki, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, Japan<br />

The gregarious endoparasitoid Tetrastichus brontispae (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) is one <strong>of</strong><br />

important natural enemies <strong>of</strong> the serious pest, the coconut hispine beetle Brontispa longissima<br />

(Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) which recently invaded and causes serious damages on coconut<br />

palm plants in Southeast Asia. To understand the ability <strong>of</strong> the parasitoid as the control agent<br />

in the region, development time at different temperatures, oviposition, superparasitism and<br />

influence <strong>of</strong> host age on parasitization <strong>of</strong> this parasitoid were investigated in the laboratory<br />

using last instar larvae and pupae <strong>of</strong> B. longissima as the host. Total development time from<br />

oviposition to adult emergence decreased as temperature increased from 22˚C to 30˚C. No<br />

parasitoid completed development at 31˚C. Temperatures had no effect on the sex ratio <strong>of</strong><br />

parasitoid <strong>of</strong>fspring. Host age affected parasitization which was high on prepupa and day 0-1<br />

pupae. Findings <strong>of</strong> this study provide the valuable information for optimizing rearing<br />

procedures <strong>of</strong> the parasitoid and we discuss probabilities to use this species as a biological<br />

control agent <strong>of</strong> the beetle.<br />

____________________________________<br />

102


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

An inordinate fondness <strong>of</strong> beetles? Even more fond <strong>of</strong> microhymenoptera!<br />

John S. Noyes<br />

Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, England, UK; jsn@nhm.ac.uk<br />

Asked what could be inferred about the work <strong>of</strong> the Creator from a study <strong>of</strong> His works, the<br />

British scientist J.B.S. Haldane is reported to have replied, that He has "an inordinate<br />

fondness for beetles." It is true that more species <strong>of</strong> beetles have been catalogued than any<br />

other group with estimates <strong>of</strong> up to 400000 species (about 20% <strong>of</strong> all living organisms)<br />

having been described to date and on the face <strong>of</strong> it Haldane’s statement would seem to be<br />

correct. The second largest group currently being the Hymenoptera with about 130000<br />

described species. Yet, an extrapolation <strong>of</strong> the British fauna, the best known in the world,<br />

suggests that beetles may represent only the third largest group (ca 5000 British species) well<br />

behind Diptera (ca 6950 species)and Hymenoptera (ca 7100 species. Recent surveys using<br />

sweep net sampling in the forests <strong>of</strong> Costa Rica supports this view. For instance, one six hour<br />

sample provided an incredible 1286 species <strong>of</strong> microhymenoptera compared with only 504<br />

species <strong>of</strong> beetles. Similar differences were found at 8 other sites at various altitudes from 75<br />

m to 1400 m across Costa Rica. At all sites the Chalcidoidea alone represented more species<br />

than the Coleoptera and was by far the largest group both in terms <strong>of</strong> numbers <strong>of</strong> species and<br />

numbers <strong>of</strong> individuals, surpassing even ants. This poster presents the detailed breakdown <strong>of</strong><br />

all families collected in the survey using a screen sweep-net fitted with a 4 mm screen which<br />

allowed only smaller individuals (


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

by the methods used on our knowledge <strong>of</strong> biodiversity. The few old specimens and the lack <strong>of</strong><br />

more recent representation in collections clearly indicate that R. nielseni is not a real novelty<br />

to the country. Rather, it had passed unnoticed due to difficulties with collecting adults with<br />

traditional methods and due to specimens being confused with another similarly coloured<br />

species. A new version <strong>of</strong> the Red List <strong>of</strong> threatened species in Finland according to IUCN<br />

criteria will be published by the end <strong>of</strong> 2010. Here, the species <strong>of</strong> the Polysphincta group <strong>of</strong><br />

genera will be evaluated for the first time. The methods used in the concerned rearing project<br />

have provided invaluable data for the evaluation <strong>of</strong> R. nielseni and several other species <strong>of</strong><br />

this group. Our work shows that the choice <strong>of</strong> collection method can significantly affect the<br />

results.<br />

____________________________________<br />

The chalcidoid parasitoids <strong>of</strong> Coccoidea in southeastern Anatolia Region <strong>of</strong> Turkey<br />

nanç Özgen* & Halil Bolu<br />

Plant Protection Department <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Faculty <strong>of</strong> Dicle University, Diyarbakır, Turkey;<br />

inancoz@hotmail.com<br />

Southeastern Anatolia Region in terms <strong>of</strong> diversity <strong>of</strong> cultivated plants is an important area in<br />

Turkey. Depending on the diversity <strong>of</strong> cultivated plants, significant yield losses are due to the<br />

most harmful organisms. In between pests, species in the superfamily Coccoidea play an<br />

important role. The undamaged nature <strong>of</strong> the region, free from chemical pesticides, supporting<br />

several natural enemies <strong>of</strong> Coccoidea that were recognized in our studies, especially<br />

chalcidoid parasitoids which play an important role in the population dynamics <strong>of</strong> scale<br />

insects. Since 2000 we investigated the chalcidoid parasitoid fauna <strong>of</strong> Coccoidea <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Southeastern Anatolia region. Parasitoids might be important biological agents in controlling<br />

scale insects.<br />

____________________________________<br />

New systematics <strong>of</strong> Australian Thrasorinae (Hymenoptera: Cynipoidea: Figitidae) with<br />

a description <strong>of</strong> two new genera and a new subfamily<br />

Jordi Paretas-Martínez 1 , Claudia Restrepo-Ortiz 1 , Matthew Buffington 2 & Juli Pujade-Villar 1 *<br />

1 University <strong>of</strong> Barcelona, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Biology, Department <strong>of</strong> Animal Biology, Avda. Diagonal 645, 08028 –<br />

Barcelona, Spain; jordi.paretas.martinez@gmail.com, claudiaximenaro@gmail.com, jpujade@ub.edu<br />

2 Systematic Entomology Laboratory, USDA, c/o NMNH, Smithsonian Institution, 10th & Constitution Ave<br />

NW. PO Box 37012 MRC-168, Washington DC 20013, USA; matt.buffington@ars.usda.gov<br />

The Thrasorinae are a stem group <strong>of</strong> Figitidae (Hymenoptera: Cynipoidea) that are associated<br />

with galls <strong>of</strong> other wasps (Cynipoidea and Chalcidoidea) on various trees and bushes, being<br />

not inquilines but rather parasitoids <strong>of</strong> the gall inducers or some other hymenopteran<br />

inhabitants in the galls with which they are associated. This makes this group a very important<br />

focus <strong>of</strong> study in order to elucidate the evolutionary history <strong>of</strong> the Figitidae in particular and<br />

the Cynipoidea as a whole, with its different life strategies: entomophagy and phytophagy.<br />

The systematics <strong>of</strong> the Thrasorinae has always been problematic: two new figitid subfamilies,<br />

the Plectocynipinae (2007) and Euceroptrinae (2008), have been erected recently to include<br />

some genera previously included in the Thrasorinae. A new systematics <strong>of</strong> Australian<br />

Thrasorinae is proposed herein. The genus Mikeius Buffington is transferred from Thrasorinae<br />

to Mikeiinae Paretas-Martínez & Pujade-Villar n. subf and a new species <strong>of</strong> Mikeius is<br />

described. Two new genera <strong>of</strong> Thrasorinae are erected to include species previously included<br />

104


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

in Mikeius (M. schauffi Buffington and M. neumanni Buffington) and Amblynotus (A.<br />

pilosiscutum Girault). A new species <strong>of</strong> Thrasorus Weld is described. A phylogenetic analysis<br />

including all these new taxa and all genera previously included in the Thrasorinae is given.<br />

____________________________________<br />

New records <strong>of</strong> Braconidae (Hymenoptera) genera from Brazil in the state <strong>of</strong> São Paulo<br />

Angélica Maria Penteado-Dias<br />

Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, SP, Brazil; angelica@ufscar.br<br />

The knowledge <strong>of</strong> the family Braconidae in Brazil is largely incomplete due to lack <strong>of</strong><br />

regional studies and the taxonomic complexity <strong>of</strong> this group.The diversity <strong>of</strong> the Braconidae<br />

in Brazil is estimated at a much higher than is currently known. From the thirty-four<br />

subfamilies <strong>of</strong> Braconidae recognized in the New World, twenty-eight <strong>of</strong> them have been<br />

reported from Brazil. In an effort to understand the richness and distribution <strong>of</strong> the Braconidae<br />

family in Brazil and specifically in the State <strong>of</strong> São Paulo, many collections have been made<br />

using Malaise traps and sweeping the vegetation. At least 191 from the 341 genera recorded<br />

from the Neotropical region are recorded from Brazil. This is a high number given that the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> genera recorded for Canada and United States is approximately 240. First records<br />

are reported for some rare genera <strong>of</strong> Braconidae in Brazil and in the State <strong>of</strong> São Paulo based<br />

on material deposited in Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, SP, Brazil. Those<br />

genera are: Andesipolis (Rhysipolinae), Topaldios (Helconinae), Paphanus (Sigalphinae) and<br />

Syntretus (Euphorinae). New species to those genera are presented and figured. Andesipolis<br />

occurs exclusively in South America with distribution restricted to the Andes. This is the first<br />

record for the genus outside <strong>of</strong> this mountain range.<br />

Financial support: FAPESP (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo) CNPq<br />

(Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico), CAPES (Coordenação de<br />

Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior), INCT/ HYMPAR- Sudeste (Instituto<br />

Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia dos Hymenoptera Parasitóides da Região Sudeste<br />

Brasileira).<br />

____________________________________<br />

What is “the news” about the institute <strong>of</strong> studies on parasitoid Hymenoptera from<br />

southeastern Brazil – HYMPAR-SUDESTE ?<br />

Angélica Maria Penteado-Dias* & Manoel Martins Dias Filho<br />

Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, SP, Brazil; angelica@ufscar.br, manoelmd@ufscar.br<br />

The HYMPAR-SUDESTE is an initiative <strong>of</strong> a group <strong>of</strong> researchers working in the Brazilian<br />

Southeastern region, in order to integrate the conservation and sustainable development<br />

efforts. The acquired scientific knowledge <strong>of</strong> biodiversity will be applied to education and<br />

economic activities as agriculture and ecotourism and to the development <strong>of</strong> mechanisms for<br />

providing environmental services. The specific objectives are to estimate the number <strong>of</strong><br />

species <strong>of</strong> Hymenoptera parasitoids at each selected site <strong>of</strong> the Southeastern region <strong>of</strong> Brazil,<br />

contributing to the knowledge <strong>of</strong> the geographical distribution <strong>of</strong> the taxonomic group<br />

studied; implement taxonomic collections <strong>of</strong> parasitoid Hymenoptera; identify areas <strong>of</strong> high<br />

incidence <strong>of</strong> endemic species for wildlife study; identify biotic interactions, involving<br />

different trophic levels; classify the studied reserve fragments in relation to their fragility in<br />

relation to biodiversity loss, contribute to the establishment <strong>of</strong> priority areas for conservation.<br />

105


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Structure and integrate projects, especially those concerned with the sustainability <strong>of</strong> the<br />

ecosystems studied, in order to reduce the fragmentation <strong>of</strong> existing forests indicating<br />

conservation priorities and promoting reforestation in rural properties; strength partnerships<br />

with public governmental agencies and non-governmental and private agribusiness institutes<br />

in the context <strong>of</strong> the integrated ecological knowledge; maintain a constant flow <strong>of</strong> information<br />

subsidizing the establishment <strong>of</strong> projects for work optimization; promote the interaction<br />

between research institutions, private companies, schools and the community; establish pilot<br />

procedures in environmental education and continuing education in areas adjacent to reserves<br />

in order to spread the knowledge and experiences that promote the protection <strong>of</strong> biodiversity<br />

and a decrease in anthropic pressure on the conservation units; define environmental<br />

indicators allowing the assessment and implementation <strong>of</strong> possible payment for<br />

environmental services with the maintenance <strong>of</strong> biodiversity; provide knowledge for<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> environmental laws; establish human resources trained in the major issues<br />

on biodiversity, involving cooperation in national and international levels. Since last May,<br />

2009, using 150 Malaise traps during 12 months in 32 localities we have collected several<br />

thousands <strong>of</strong> insects; the Ichneumonoidea and Chalcidoidea are mounted on pins to be<br />

identified. The most common are the Microgastrinae (Braconidae), the Campopleginae<br />

(Ichneumonidae) and the Eulophidae (Chalcidoidea). Several rare genera have been collected.<br />

We have found new trophic interactions between Hymenoptera parasitoids and Lepidoptera,<br />

in special to Geometridae species. Several training courses to study the Hymenoptera<br />

parasitoids were given, involving under graduated and graduated students. Several papers,<br />

Master dissertations and PhD thesis are been prepared and published.<br />

Financial support: FAPESP (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo) CNPq<br />

(Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico), CAPES (Coordenação de<br />

Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior), INCT/ HYMPAR- Sudeste (Instituto<br />

Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia dos Hymenoptera Parasitóides da Região Sudeste<br />

Brasileira).<br />

____________________________________<br />

Diversity <strong>of</strong> Alysiinae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in protected areas from the<br />

Comunidad Valenciana, Spain<br />

Francisco Javier Peris-Felipo*, Jose Vicente Falcó-Garí, M.T. Oltra-Moscardó & R. Jiménez Peydró<br />

Entomology and Pest Control Laboratory, Cavanilles Institute <strong>of</strong> Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Valencia, Spain; Francisco.peris@uv.es<br />

The study <strong>of</strong> Hymenoptera parasitoids has a great interest from the point <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong><br />

biodiversity and conservation because the interactions with their hosts allow the maintenance<br />

<strong>of</strong> insect populations in balance in the ecosystem.<br />

A sampling work with Malaise traps from April 2004 to December 2007 was done in three<br />

protected natural areas <strong>of</strong> the Comunidad Valenciana (Spain): Natural Park <strong>of</strong> Las Lagunas <strong>of</strong><br />

La Mata-Torrevieja, Natural Park <strong>of</strong> Font Roja and Natural Park <strong>of</strong> La Tinença Benifassà.<br />

Each <strong>of</strong> these areas shows particular climatic conditions.<br />

In this communication we analyze the richness <strong>of</strong> the genera belonging to Alysiinae subfamily<br />

and we compare the similarity <strong>of</strong> the sampled areas.<br />

This work was supported by the research project CGL-2004-02711, c<strong>of</strong>inanced by the Ministry <strong>of</strong> Science and<br />

Technology and the European Union (European Funds for Regional Development).<br />

____________________________________<br />

106


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Habitat distribution patterns <strong>of</strong> Alysiinae community (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in a<br />

forest reserve in Spain<br />

Francisco Javier Peris-Felipo, Jose Vicente Falcó-Garí, M.T. Oltra-Moscardó & R. Jiménez Peydró<br />

Entomology and Pest Control Laboratory, Cavanilles Institute <strong>of</strong> Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Valencia, Spain; Francisco.peris@uv.es<br />

Alysiinae braconids are a wide subfamily composed <strong>of</strong> 1500 species world-wide described.<br />

Two tribes are recognized: Alysiini and Dacnusini. The members <strong>of</strong> Alysiini parasite a wide<br />

range <strong>of</strong> cyclorrapha hosts while the members <strong>of</strong> Dacnusini are almost exclusively confined to<br />

leaf-miners hosts, such as Agromyzidae, Ephydridae and Chloropidae.<br />

The capture <strong>of</strong> these Hymenoptera was done during a period <strong>of</strong> two years using Malaise traps<br />

in the Reserve <strong>of</strong> Artikutza placed in the Natural Park <strong>of</strong> Peñas de Aia (Navarra). This natural<br />

area contains two habitats: mixed forest and beech forest.<br />

The collected specimens are analyzed to know if Alysiinae community has a preference<br />

selection in the habitat distribution. When analyzing the samples, it is possible to see that the<br />

diversity is higher in the mixed forest than in the beech forest. And, it is possible to<br />

distinguish a significant difference between habitats in relation with the particular community<br />

<strong>of</strong> Alysiinae.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Little known facts about a well known hymenopteran: on the field life history <strong>of</strong> Nasonia<br />

vitripennis (Walker, 1836) (Chalcidoidea: Pteromalidae)<br />

Ralph S. Peters & Rudolf Abraham<br />

Zoologisches Museum Hamburg, Martin-Luther-King-Platz 3, 20146 Hamburg, Germany;<br />

ralph.peters@uni-hamburg.de; abraham@zoologie.uni-hamburg.de<br />

The gregarious parasitoid Nasonia vitripennis is easy to rear on puparia <strong>of</strong> various flies and<br />

has become a well established laboratory model organism over the last few decades. Its use<br />

has found its temporary pinnacle in the recent publication <strong>of</strong> the complete genome <strong>of</strong> this<br />

species and its sibling taxa N. giraulti and N. longicornis.<br />

However, data are missing on its natural field life history in terms <strong>of</strong> e.g. host finding, host<br />

range, habitat choice and phenology. We investigated on some <strong>of</strong> these aspects over the last<br />

years and present in this poster a preliminary synopsis <strong>of</strong> our work.<br />

N. vitripennis lives in nests <strong>of</strong> some bird species. Those nests are its primary habitat and the<br />

species can be found there in high quantities. We show its position in a birds’ nest food web<br />

along with its main field hosts and few other much less specialised parasitoid species. The<br />

field hosts are mainly bloodsucking Protocalliphora spp. and necrophagous Calliphora vicina<br />

(Calliphoridae) and to a lesser proportion saprophagous Potamia littoralis (Muscidae). Earlier<br />

results from experimental placing <strong>of</strong> sentinel hosts corroborate the assumption that to a far<br />

extent N. vitripennis specialises on birds’ nests: It only parasitizes hosts in greater heights and<br />

does not parasitize hosts in empty nest boxes. Also, the synchronisation <strong>of</strong> the birds breeding<br />

season and the phenology <strong>of</strong> N. vitripennis is well known. In olfactometer tests we were able<br />

to show that N. vitripennis females largely use olfactory cues <strong>of</strong> the birds nest material in their<br />

host finding process.<br />

We also present results on the actual and the potential host range <strong>of</strong> the species as well as<br />

fecundity and sex ratio data from field hosts <strong>of</strong> different size.<br />

107


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

With these and future studies we hope to contribute to a more complete understanding <strong>of</strong> the<br />

model Nasonia merging genetics, genomics, experimental studies and field life history traits.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Confirmation <strong>of</strong> the species rank <strong>of</strong> Torymus macrurus (Föerster, 1859)<br />

(Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea: Torymidae)<br />

Irinel E. Popescu<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Zoology and Ecology, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Biology, “Al. I. Cuza” University, Iasi, Romania;<br />

irinellus@yahoo.com<br />

Förster (1859) described just the female <strong>of</strong> this species, as Syntomaspis macrurus, from a<br />

single specimen obtained from galls on Quercus pedunculata in Hungary. The holotype <strong>of</strong><br />

this species is apparently lost and the status <strong>of</strong> this species was “species inquirendae” for long<br />

time. Erdös (1960) mentioned that there no material in museum from Budapest. Grissell<br />

(1995) enumerate this species as Torymus macrura in his world catalogue <strong>of</strong> Toryminae.<br />

Graham & Gijswijt (1998) mentioned that they could not find any material in<br />

Naturhistorisches Museum from Vienna in 1993 and they mentioned that this species was<br />

reared in Poland but don’t <strong>of</strong>fer any other information (the paper, the author). They don’t<br />

include the species in the key <strong>of</strong> the European species <strong>of</strong> the genus Torymus but they discuss<br />

this species in a special chapter <strong>of</strong> “species inquirendae”. Zavada (2003) placed this species in<br />

the cyaneus species group and mentioned at the materials examined 1 1 obtained from<br />

galls <strong>of</strong> Cynips quercusfolii (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae) in Moldavia (collected by Plugaru in<br />

1963), 1 from the same host obtained in Ukraine (collected by Rayevsky in 1973) and other<br />

6 from the same country (collected by Diakonchuk in 1974), all this materials belongs to<br />

the collection <strong>of</strong> the Schmalhausen Institute <strong>of</strong> Zoology <strong>of</strong> National Academy <strong>of</strong> Sciences <strong>of</strong><br />

Ukraine (Kiev, Ukraine). Popescu (2003) mentioned T. macrurus also from Cynips quercusfolii<br />

in Romania. Zerova & Seryogina (2003) placed this species in the Syntomaspis subgenus<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Torymus genus and mentioned it from Biorhiza pallida. Zerova et al. (2003) mentioned<br />

specimens <strong>of</strong> T. macrurus obtained from C. quercusfolii being in the collection <strong>of</strong><br />

Schmalhausen Institute <strong>of</strong> Zoology, collected in 1963, 1973 and 1974 years.<br />

I obtained 3 from galls <strong>of</strong> Cynips quercusfolii (L.) (agamic generation) on leaves <strong>of</strong> Quercus<br />

sp. collected on 04.2000 at Repedea, Iai county, Romania and 1 from the same host and<br />

locality, galls collected on 29.03.2006. The species is closely related to Torymus cyaneus and<br />

differ mainly by longer ovipositor. I describe the species using drawings, SEM and photonic<br />

microscopy, giving a modern description <strong>of</strong> this apparently rare species with questionable<br />

status through time.<br />

____________________________________<br />

The maxillo-labial complex in scelionid wasps<br />

(Hymenoptera: Platygastroidea)<br />

Ovidiu Alin Popovici<br />

“Al. I. Cuza” University, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Biology, Iasi, Romania; popovici_alin_ovidiu@yahoo.com<br />

The parasitoid wasp superfamily Platygastroidea, traditionally divided into two families, the<br />

Platygastridae and the Scelionidae (e.g., Masner 1993, 1995; Austin et al. 2005), is the third<br />

largest <strong>of</strong> the parasitic superfamilies after the Ichneumonoidea and Chalcidoidea and<br />

108


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

represents some 4460 described species worldwide (Austin et al. 2005), but the world fauna is<br />

estimated to be about 10000 species (Masner 1993).<br />

Characters <strong>of</strong> MLC, like any morphological and anatomical characters are an important<br />

source <strong>of</strong> data in systematic and taxonomic research. Quicke (1993, in Winson 1999) defines<br />

a taxonomic character as “any physical structure (macroscopic, microscopic or molecular) or<br />

behavioral system that can have more than one form (character state), the variation in which<br />

potentially provides phylogenetic information.” The mouthparts throughout the orders <strong>of</strong><br />

Insecta are composed <strong>of</strong> a set <strong>of</strong> homologous components rich in variation, so, from this<br />

reason, they should provide excellent data for phylogenetic studies (Krenn 2007).<br />

The aim <strong>of</strong> this study is to present a clear description <strong>of</strong> the MLC in scelionids, proper<br />

recognition <strong>of</strong> homologous characters with other hymenopterans and <strong>of</strong> synonymies between<br />

terms used by different authors. The second goal is to emphasize the peculiarity <strong>of</strong> MLC in<br />

scelionids and establish the ground plan character states for scelionids and relate them to<br />

structures observed in other hymenoptera. Finally, we seek to provide a precise nomenclature<br />

for MLC in scelionids for use in systematics, and thus to contribute to further advances in our<br />

understanding <strong>of</strong> the taxonomy and interrelationships <strong>of</strong> its constituent groups.<br />

To emphasis the peculiarity <strong>of</strong> MLC in scelionids, we made a comparison between MLC in<br />

Sparasion (Scelionidae: Platygastroidea) and MLC in Helorus (Heloridae: Proctotrupoidea),<br />

Proctotrupes (Proctotrupidae: Proctotrupoidea) and Belyta (Diapriidae: Proctotrupoidea).<br />

These three genera were chosen for comparison for 2 reasons: (1) superfamily<br />

Proctotrupoidea is, at least apparently, very old (Masner, 1993) so, we have the chance to<br />

identify for each character the plesiomorphic state; (2) until relatively recently (Masner 1956;<br />

Masner 1993), Proctotrupoidea and Platygastroidea were regarded as a single superfamily and<br />

we can see if characters <strong>of</strong> MLC are valuable in the high level classification <strong>of</strong><br />

microhymenoptera, or eventually, if at the level <strong>of</strong> MLC there are characters what could show<br />

a link between these two superfamilies.<br />

Characters <strong>of</strong> MLC like: degree <strong>of</strong> sclerotization, shape <strong>of</strong> cardo, shape <strong>of</strong> stipes, position <strong>of</strong><br />

maxillary palpus and position <strong>of</strong> galea and lacinia, relationships between galea and lacinia,<br />

shape <strong>of</strong> prementum seems to confirm the idea <strong>of</strong> Masner (1993) that Proctotrupoiea consists<br />

<strong>of</strong> two natural units, one comprises Pelecinidae, Vanhorniidae, Proctotrupidae, Heloridae,<br />

Peradeniidae and Roproniidae and the second comprises Monomachidae, Austroniidae and<br />

Diapriidae. At level <strong>of</strong> MLC there are more similarities between Helorus and Proctotrupes<br />

than between any <strong>of</strong> these genera and Belyta. Furthermore, characters <strong>of</strong> MLC in Belyta look<br />

intermediary between (Helorus + Proctotrupes) and Sparasion. It seems that the detailed<br />

study <strong>of</strong> MLC could provide important charters for the higher-level taxonomy <strong>of</strong><br />

Proctotrupoidea s. l.<br />

____________________________________<br />

First record <strong>of</strong> Dicopus minutissimus Enock (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) from the<br />

European mainland<br />

Emilian Pricop<br />

“Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Biology, Bd. Carol I 20a, 700505 Iai, Romania;<br />

pricopemilian@yahoo.com<br />

The genus Dicopus Enock 1909, belongs to the family Mymaridae and it is considered one <strong>of</strong><br />

the most rarely collected fairy flies. The species belonging to this genus are tiny parasitoids<br />

109


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

(0.2 -0.4 mm). From Europe, three species have been described: Dicopus minutissimus Enock,<br />

1909, Dicopus citri Mercet, 1912 and ?Dicopus cervus Morley, 1930. The species described<br />

in 1930 by C. Morley as D. cervus obviously does not belong to the family Mymaridae<br />

(Ogloblin 1956).<br />

It is the first time when Dicopus minutissimus is found on the European mainland; the species<br />

is known until now only from England; the genus Dicopus Enock is also mentioned for the<br />

first time from Romania. We illustrate the species distribution, the morphology <strong>of</strong>: wings,<br />

antennas in male and female - head, thorax and abdomen. Also we describe the male genitalia<br />

and give the biometry for some females and males. The taxonomic status <strong>of</strong> the specimen<br />

belonging to Dicopus found by Baquero & Jordana (2002) in Spain should be confirmed in<br />

relation to Dicopus minutissimus Enock, as the clave and the last funicle articles are longer<br />

and thinner than in Enock’s original description. Enock (1909) in his original description<br />

reveals a very important feature that the antennal club is equal in length to the 6 th , 7 th , 8 th , and<br />

9 th antennal segments combined, a feature that is found in our specimens. Mercet (1912) noted<br />

that the species D. citri has wider wings, compared with D. minutissimus, a species with<br />

narrow wings and also the last three articles <strong>of</strong> the female antenna have different proportions<br />

between the two species. Beside some important - genus features: scape with 2 or 3 setaceous<br />

teeth, mandibles projecting downward and away from the head (bladelike), we also mention<br />

some new features for this genus and species: antennal clava in females has a gap (gouge-like)<br />

to the distal end, with a modified trichoid sensilla; hind tibia with an apical tooth, and also a<br />

propodeal carina as an overturned “Y” is also present (probably different in each species).<br />

Male genitalia is almost cylindrical, (phallobase united to aedeagus), long, narrowed proximal<br />

and distal, not strongly sclerotized, with long parameres and with long and strongly<br />

sclerotized volsellar digiti, apparently each with three hooklets. Our material was collected<br />

during 2008-2009 from different locations found in the North-Eastern part <strong>of</strong> Romania –<br />

Bistritei Mountains, and it is preserved in a personal collection belonging to Emilian Pricop.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Parasitoids wasps reported on willow aphids in Iran<br />

Solmaz Rahemi 1 , S.E. Sadeghi 2* , E. Rakhshani 3 , S. Moharramipour 4 , M. Shojai 1 & S. Zeinali 2<br />

1 Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran; solmaz.rahemi@gmail.com<br />

2 Research Institute <strong>of</strong> Forests and Rangelands <strong>of</strong> Iran, P.O.Box: 13185-116, Iran<br />

3 Department <strong>of</strong> Plant Protection, College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, University <strong>of</strong> Zabol, Iran<br />

4 Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University, Iran<br />

Willows are considered as the most important elements for park design; willow extract is<br />

widely used in various medicinal industries in Iran. Thus, studies on willow pests and the<br />

biotic factors influence the pest populations are essential for the integrated pest management.<br />

Several aphid species reported as pests <strong>of</strong> willow trees in Iran, which cause direct damage to<br />

the plants and also serve as vectors for different pathogens. Next aphid species on willows are<br />

reported from Iran: Aphis farinosa Gmel, Cavariella aquatica (Gill. & Bragg), C. aegopodii<br />

(Scop.), C. cicutae (Koch), C. archangelicae (Scop.), Chaitophorus truncates Hausmann, Ch.<br />

pakistanicus HRL, Ch. salicti (Schrank), Ch. vitellinae (Schrank), Ch. remaudierei Pintera,<br />

Ch. salijaponicus ssp. niger Mordv, Ch. nigritus HRL, Plocamaphis flocculosa Weed ssp.<br />

goernitzi Boerner, Pterocomma pilosum Buckt, Phylloxerina salicis Lichtenstein,<br />

Tuberolachnus salignus (Gmelin). The Willow giant aphid (Tuberolachnus salignus) is the<br />

most important aphid pest on willows, reported from 16 Salix species in Iran. The honeydew<br />

110


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

<strong>of</strong> T. salignus is considered as a by-product <strong>of</strong> willow in Iran and widely used in<br />

pharmacology under name Bidkhesht.<br />

Five species <strong>of</strong> Aphidiinae (Braconidae) were reported on willow aphids from Iran: Adialytus<br />

salicaphis (Fitch, 1855) on Chaitophorus remaudierei (Pintera) and Ch. salijaponicus<br />

(Mordvilko), Aphidius cingulatus (Ruthe, 1859) on Pterocoma pilosum Buckt., Aphidius<br />

salicis (Haliday, 1834) on Cavariella aegopodii (Scopoli), Binodoxys brevicornis (Haliday,<br />

1833) on C. aegopodii, and Ephedrus helleni (Mackauer, 1968) on C. aquatica (Gillette &<br />

Bragg).<br />

____________________________________<br />

New species <strong>of</strong> the genus Lathrolestes (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae) from the World<br />

Alexey Reshchikov<br />

Entomology Department, St Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya nab., 7/9,<br />

St Petersburg, 19903 Russia; lerth@yandex.ru<br />

The genus Lathrolestes Förster, 1869 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae) is a large, mainly<br />

Holarctic genus with 61 described species (Yu et al. 2005). Of these, 32 species occur in the<br />

Nearctic region (Barron 1994), 26 species in the Palearctic region, predominantly Europe (Yu<br />

et al. 2005), one species in the Afrotropical region, Congo (Benoit 1955), four species in the<br />

Neotropics, Costa Rica (Gauld et al. 1997), and two species in the Oriental region(Uchida<br />

1932, 1940). This genus belongs to the subfamily Ctenopelmatinae (Hymenoptera,<br />

Ichneumonidae) and the tribe Perilissini which is distributed worldwide except Australia and<br />

Oceania with 23 genera and over 250 species.<br />

The larvae <strong>of</strong> members <strong>of</strong> this genus feed as koinobont endoparasitoids <strong>of</strong> sawflies mainly.<br />

The world distribution <strong>of</strong> Symphyta allows to assume a high biodiversity <strong>of</strong> the genus<br />

Lathrolestes. Last finds confirm this. Several new species <strong>of</strong> Lathrolestes were described or<br />

determined by author recently from different zoogeographical regions.<br />

Two new Oriental species have been discovered in Taiwan and Japan (Reshchikov, in press).<br />

One new species was collected in Sichuan, China by American naturalist D.C. Graham in<br />

1930. The fauna <strong>of</strong> Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera) <strong>of</strong> Nepal is not known satisfactorily.<br />

Mainly members <strong>of</strong> the subfamilies Ichneumoninae and Campopleginae, and no until now<br />

members <strong>of</strong> the subfamily Ctenopelmatinae, are known from this country. While examining<br />

Ichneumonidae collected during the Canadian Expedition to Nepal in 1967 author came<br />

across one new species <strong>of</strong> the genus Lathrolestes [unpublished data].<br />

Members <strong>of</strong> Lathrolestes were not registered in Mexico but according to the neighbour faunas<br />

(Barron 1994, Gauld et al. 1997), roughly 9 known species could be found there. Description<br />

<strong>of</strong> four new species from Mexico is prepared [unpublished data]. One new species <strong>of</strong><br />

Lathrolestes was described in collaboration with Finnish colleagues from Ecuador<br />

(Reshchikov et al., in press). These are additions to Neotropical fauna which includes four<br />

species <strong>of</strong> Lathrolestes (Gauld et al. 1997).<br />

Five species were described as new from the USA in support <strong>of</strong> the biological control <strong>of</strong><br />

invasive European tenthredinid leafminers in North America. Two <strong>of</strong> them were reared from<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>enusa thomsoni, pest <strong>of</strong> birch which was introduced in North America (Reshchikov et al.<br />

2010).<br />

The biggest biodiversity <strong>of</strong> the genus was detected in Eastern Palearctic where 17 new species<br />

were determined. In Western Palearctic, fauna <strong>of</strong> which is well known, 3 new species were<br />

111


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

determined [unpublished data]. The revision <strong>of</strong> the Palearctic species <strong>of</strong> Lathrolestes is<br />

coming.<br />

Thus, 34 species <strong>of</strong> Lathrolestes are going to be described as new, further to 61 previously<br />

described species. Further studies <strong>of</strong> the genus Lathrolestes is required to provide the work on<br />

phylogeny <strong>of</strong> the tribe Perilissini, since it could bring some new characters <strong>of</strong> some new<br />

species.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Oak gallwasp fauna <strong>of</strong> Iran (Hymenoptera, Cynipidae, Cynipini)<br />

S. Ebrahim Sadeghi 1* , Melika, G., Stone, GN., Assareh, M.A., Askary, H., Tavakoli, M., Yarmand, H.,<br />

Azizkhani, E., Zargaran, M.R., Barimani, H., Dordaii, A.A., Aligholizadeh, D., Salehi, M., Mozafari,<br />

M., Golestaneh, R., Zeinali, S., Mehrabi, A.<br />

1 Research Institute <strong>of</strong> Forest and Rangelands, Tehran, POBox 13185-116, Iran; ebrasadeghi@gmail.com<br />

36 species <strong>of</strong> oak gallwasps were known earlier from Iran (Chodjai 1980) which from near<br />

1/3 <strong>of</strong> species were erroneously listed or misidentified and only 24 species were correctly<br />

listed (marked with asterisk below). This study was carried out during 2001-2007. Six main<br />

species <strong>of</strong> Quercus were sampled: Q. infectoria, Q. macranthera, Q. petraea, (in Quercus s.s.<br />

section <strong>of</strong> oaks), and Q. brantii, Q. libani, Q. castaneifolia (in Cerris section oaks) in Zagross,<br />

Arasbaran, Fandoghlo, Andabil, Tarom Olya & S<strong>of</strong>la, and Caspian forests <strong>of</strong> Iran. Eighty two<br />

(82) oak gallwasp species were found on different oak species in Iran, which from 20 species<br />

are new records for the Iranian fauna and 25 species were described as new for science. The<br />

next 57 species, known also from other regions, were found in Iran: Andricus aries, A. askewi,<br />

A. caliciformis, A. caputmedusae*, A. cecconii*, A. conglomeratus*, A. coriarius*, A.<br />

corruptrix, A. crispator, A. curtisii*, A. curvator, A. cydoniae, A. dentimitratus, A.<br />

foecundatrix*, A. galeatus, A. glandulae, A. gemmeus, A. grossulariae*, A. hystrix, A.<br />

infectorius*, A. inflator, A. insana*, A. kollari*, A. lucidus*, A. malpighii, A. moreae, A.<br />

multiplicatus, A. pictus, A. polycerus, A. sternlichti, A. theophrastea*, A. tomentosus*,<br />

Aphelonyx cerricola, Biorhiza pallida*, Callirhytis glandium, C. reticulates, C. rufescens,<br />

Cerroneuroterus gyulaigaraiae, C. lanuginosus*, Cynips cornifex, C. divisa, C. korsakovi, C.<br />

loricatus, C. quercus*, C. quercusfolii*, Chilaspis israeli, Neuroterus albipes, N. anthracinus,<br />

N. numismalis*, N. quercusbaccarum*, N. tricolor*, Pseudoneuroterus macropterus*, P.<br />

saliens*, Synophrus olivieri, S. politus*, Trigonaspis megaptera, T. synaspis*.<br />

25 new species were described during this project from Iran: Andricus assarehi, A.<br />

atkinsonae, A. chodjaii, A. coriariformis, A. csokai, A. istvani, A. libani, A. megalucidus, A.<br />

megatruncicolus, A. pseudoaries, A. pujadevillari, A. sadeghii, A. schoenroggei, A. stellatus,<br />

A. stonei, Aphelonyx persica, A. kordestanica, Dryocosmus caspiensis, D. jungalii, D. mikoi,<br />

D. tavakolii, Pseudoneuroterus mazandarani, P. nichollsi, Synophrus libani, S. syriacus.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Study on the biology and efficiency determination testes <strong>of</strong> Habrobracon hebetor Say<br />

(Hymenoptera: Braconidae) on larvae <strong>of</strong> Plodia interpunctella Hübner<br />

(Lepidoptera: Pyralidae)<br />

Nouraddin Shayesteh<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, Agricultural and Natural Resources Faculty <strong>of</strong> Islamic Azad University Branch <strong>of</strong><br />

Mahabad. P.O.Box: 59135-443 Mahabad, IRAN; pr<strong>of</strong>shayesteh@yahoo.com<br />

112


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

The results <strong>of</strong> laboratory studies on the biology H. hebetor at 30±2 °C, 60±5% RH and<br />

ultimate larvae <strong>of</strong> Plodia interpunctella indicated that developmental duration <strong>of</strong> this<br />

parasitoid take places in 10.765 days (egg 1.575 ± 0.30 days, larvae 2.592± 0.11 days and<br />

pupa 6.598±0.15 days). Newly emerged female parasitoid responded well to host larvae. The<br />

adult lived longest when provided with both honey and water, without food they survived less<br />

than 4 days. Results showed that female parasitoid deposited eggs throughout the 24 hours,<br />

period. There were no significant difference, in reproduction and longevity between virgin<br />

and mated females. Development and survival periods <strong>of</strong> H. hebetor on P. interpunctella were<br />

studied at five temperatures ranging from 17 to 35°C. The lower developmental thresholds for<br />

eggs, larvae and pupa were extrapolated from the linear relationship between temperature and<br />

growth rate lower developmental thresholds were estimated to be 5.907 (egg), 14.749<br />

(larvae), 15.7156 (pupa). Degree-day (DD) accusations <strong>of</strong> 41.88, 45.05 and 89.14 were<br />

required for completion <strong>of</strong> the egg, larvae and pupa stages. Variation <strong>of</strong> trend <strong>of</strong> progeny sex<br />

ratio and sex ratio in relation to host density and effect <strong>of</strong> age parasitoid and host size on it<br />

showed that H. hebetor has a male biased sex ratio. The total number <strong>of</strong> eggs per female per<br />

day (mean) increased from 13.8 to with the host density increasing from 1 to 16. study<br />

coordinative effect <strong>of</strong> age parasitoid and host size on progeny sex ratio showed that age<br />

parasitoid increased sex ratio (female/ total) significantly, but host size had no effect on sex<br />

ratio and interaction between age parasitoid and size host on sex ratio <strong>of</strong> progeny have not<br />

significant effect.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Structural colours in Hymenoptera wings<br />

Ekaterina Shevtsova & Christer Hansson<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Biology, Zoology, Lund University, Sweden; Ekaterina.Shevtsova@cob.lu.se,<br />

Christer.Hansson@cob.lu.se.<br />

The patterns <strong>of</strong> bright structural colours on transparent wings <strong>of</strong> small Hymenoptera (body<br />

length 3mm, e.g. most species in superfamily Chalcidoidea) have been totally overlooked<br />

by biologists. The wing morphology regarding colour patterns in such groups has been<br />

described in terms <strong>of</strong> “black and brown” with complete disregard for the colourful reflections<br />

<strong>of</strong> the wing surface. With the discovery <strong>of</strong> WIP (see below) real colour patterns can now be<br />

observed, and investigated to get a more complete evolutionary picture, and the usual concept<br />

that wings in the Hymenoptera can not match the incredible diversity <strong>of</strong> butterfly wing<br />

patterns seems now an oversimplification.<br />

Transparent wings <strong>of</strong> tiny Hymenoptera are extremely thin (between 100 and 1000<br />

nanometers thick) and display vivid colour patterns due to thin film interference. We call<br />

these patterns WIP – Wing Interference Patterns, and they reflect uneven physical thickness<br />

<strong>of</strong> the wing membrane and are non-iridescent and taxon-specific. The physics <strong>of</strong> this optical<br />

phenomenon is pretty simple – two beam interference, but morphological features <strong>of</strong> the<br />

wings play their role to dioptrically stabilize and reinforce WIP by membrane corrugations,<br />

setae arrangements, venation and pigmentation.<br />

WIPs appear strong both in live and dry museum specimens and they are relatively easy to<br />

document digitally which makes this new morphological character a user-friendly tool in<br />

biodiversity investigations. WIP have a large potential in the studies <strong>of</strong> diversity and<br />

evolution in insects, integrating biophysics, taxonomy, genetics and behavioral biology.<br />

____________________________________<br />

113


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

The ant genus Monomorium in Australia: morphological plasticity or cryptic diversity?<br />

K.S. Sparks 1 , A.D. Austin 1* , A.N. Andersen 2 , S.O. Shattuck 3 , & S.C. Donnellan 1,4<br />

1 Australian Centre for Evolutionary Biology and Biodiversity, School <strong>of</strong> Earth and Environmental Science, The<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia; andy.austin@adelaide.edu.au<br />

2 CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems OIC, Tropical Ecosystems Research Centre PMB 44 Winnellie, NT 0822,<br />

Australia<br />

3 CSIRO Entomology, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia<br />

4 Evolutionary Biology Unit, South Australian Museum, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia<br />

Monomorium Mayr (Formicidae) is a highly abundant, widespread and diverse genus <strong>of</strong> ants.<br />

Several Australian “species” show considerable morphological and chemical variation, while<br />

evidence from ecological and preliminary molecular research suggests significant cryptic<br />

diversity. However, rigorous morphological criteria that support separate species have proved<br />

difficult. In this study we are using sequence data from multiple loci to generate a phylogeny<br />

for the Australian species in order to test the current species group relationships and to<br />

generate hypotheses for species boundaries in the seed harvesting M. “rothsteini” complex.<br />

Preliminary results indicate that species groups, as currently understood, are not reflected in<br />

the molecular phylogeny and that several groups may be paraphyletic or polyphyletic. Our<br />

results also provide preliminary evidence that M. “rothsteini” represents a large complex <strong>of</strong><br />

species distributed across the continent.<br />

____________________________________<br />

The effect <strong>of</strong> grassland restoration on bee communities – a preliminary study in<br />

Hortobágy National Park, Hungary<br />

Gyula Szabó 1* , Roland Horváth 1 , Erika Zakar 2 , Lajos Kozák 2 , Szabolcs Lengyel 1<br />

1 Department <strong>of</strong> Ecology, University <strong>of</strong> Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Egyetem tér 1, Hungary;<br />

safranek85@gmail.com<br />

2 Department <strong>of</strong> Nature Conservation, Zoology and Game Management, University <strong>of</strong> Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen,<br />

Böszörményi út 138, Hungary<br />

The decline <strong>of</strong> ecosystem services in response to agricultural intensification has become a<br />

worldwide phenomenon, and pollinators are extremely threatened. We studied bee<br />

assemblages in the Egyek-Pusztakócs marsh and grassland system in Hortobágy National<br />

Park in the summer <strong>of</strong> 2009. Grassland restoration was carried out on 760 ha former<br />

croplands (alfalfa, wheat and sunflower fields) between 2005 and 2008. Year 1 following<br />

restoration was characterized by dense cover <strong>of</strong> weeds. The cover <strong>of</strong> grasses exceeded that <strong>of</strong><br />

weeds by Year 2, and the first non-sown grasses and dicotyledonous species occurred from<br />

Year 3. The aim <strong>of</strong> our preliminary study was to compare bee communities on one-, two-,<br />

three- and four-year-old grassland restorations and native grasslands and to compare capture<br />

success <strong>of</strong> traps with different placement and killing liquid. The four age treatments plus the<br />

native grassland were replicated at two sampling sites (10 sites total). At each site, twelve<br />

yellow plate-traps (25cm diameter x 3cm high) were set, with two placement methods (on the<br />

ground, on a 1.2-m stick) and two killing liquids (ethylene-glycol with detergent, water with<br />

detergent) each replicated by three traps. The distance between traps was 10 m in every<br />

direction. We analyzed data by one-way analyses <strong>of</strong> variance (ANOVA) using species<br />

richness and abundance as response variables. We found a significant positive correlation<br />

between bee species richness and abundance and the age <strong>of</strong> grasslands. Both species richness<br />

and abundance decreased from Year 1 to 2, and increased afterwards. Year 4 grassland<br />

restorations had significantly more species and higher abundances than Year 2 restorations.<br />

114


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Although several traps were destroyed by grazing livestock, mowing or fire management,<br />

most bee specimens were collected by traps placed on sticks and filled with ethylene-glycol<br />

plus detergent. Our results suggest that grassland restoration effectively increases the species<br />

richness and abundance <strong>of</strong> bee communities and can be useful in protecting pollinators and<br />

maintaining ecosystem services.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Turkish Eurytomidae and Torymidae (Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea): published data<br />

and new records<br />

Anelia Stojanova 1* , Hasan Sungur Civelek 2 , Berna Yörük 2 , Sabahat Sarı 2 & Tuçe Atahan 2<br />

1 Plovdiv University, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Biology, Department <strong>of</strong> Zoology, Plovdiv 4000, Bulgaria;<br />

stanelia@uni-plovdiv.bg<br />

2 Mugla University, Science and Art Faculty, Department <strong>of</strong> Biology, 48170 Kötekli, Mugla, Turkey<br />

In the present paper all available published data concerning Turkish Eurytomidae and<br />

Torymidae (Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea) is summarized. Seventy-three species from<br />

Eurytomidae and 40 species from Torymidae were recorded in entomological papers till now.<br />

As a result <strong>of</strong> our study, new records to the Turkish fauna are herein presented: 7 species from<br />

Eurytomidae (Bruchophagus platypterus (Walker, 1834); Eurytoma augasmae Zerova, 1977;<br />

Eurytoma herbaria Zerova, 1994; Eurytoma koeleriae Erdös, 1969; Eurytoma strigifrons<br />

Thomson, 1875; Rileya asiatica Zerova, 1976 and Systole conspicua Erdös, 1951) and 10<br />

species from Torymidae (Eridontomerus fulviventris Erdös, 1954; Megastigmus stigmatizans<br />

(Fabricius, 1798); Megastigmus synophri Mayr, 1874; Pseudotorymus arvernicus (Walker,<br />

1833); Pseudotorymus papaveris (Thomson, 1875); Pseudotorymus rosarum (Zerova et<br />

Seregina, 1992); Torymus cyaneus Walker, 1847; Torymus flavipes (Walker, 1833), Torymus<br />

longicalcar (Graham, 1994) and Torymus pygmaeus (Mayr, 1874).<br />

____________________________________<br />

Montage Ultra: High Resolution Imaging <strong>of</strong> Parasitic Hymenoptera<br />

Elijah Talamas<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, The Ohio State University, 1315 Kinnear Road, Columbus, Ohio 43212 USA;<br />

talamas.1@osu.edu<br />

The small size <strong>of</strong> parasitic wasps hinders an appreciation <strong>of</strong> their existence by much <strong>of</strong><br />

society. Here, a simple method for producing very large, high resolution images is presented,<br />

with the intention <strong>of</strong> increasing awareness via the aesthetic forms <strong>of</strong> microhymenoptera. The<br />

results have myriad uses, including public museum display, morphological diagrams, and<br />

home decoration.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Parasitoid communities (Chalcidoidea) <strong>of</strong> oak gallwasps <strong>of</strong> Iran<br />

(Hymenoptera: Cynipidae)<br />

Majid Tavakoli 1 *, George Melika, S. Ebrahim Sadeghi, Richard R. Askew, Graham N. Stone, Hassan<br />

Barimani, Davood Aligholizadeh, Ali asghar Dordaii, Hamid Yarmand, Mohammad Reza Zargaran &<br />

Seadat Mozafarian<br />

1 Lorestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center, Khorramabad, Lorestan, P.O.Box: 348, Iran;<br />

majide322@yahoo.com<br />

115


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

This study was carried out during 2001-2008. Six main species <strong>of</strong> Quercus were sampled: Q.<br />

infectoria, Q. macranthera, Q. petraea, (in Quercus s.s. section <strong>of</strong> oaks), and Q. brantii, Q.<br />

libani, Q. castaneifolia (in Cerris section oaks) in Zagross, Arasbaran, Fandoghlo, Andabil,<br />

Tarom Olya & S<strong>of</strong>la, and Caspian forests <strong>of</strong> Iran. Eighty two (82) oak gallwasp species were<br />

found on different oak species in Iran. Under laboratory conditions 42 species <strong>of</strong> chalcidoid<br />

parasitoids were reared and identified from 52 species <strong>of</strong> oak gallwasps (from 46 asexual and<br />

6 sexual gall forms): Eurytomidae – 8 species (Sycophila biguttata, S. flavicollis, S. iracemae,<br />

S. variegata, Eurytoma brunniventris, E. pistacina, E. sp. nr infracta, Eurytoma ?strigifrons);<br />

Torymidae – 6 (Megastigmus dorsalis, M. stigmatizans, Torymus auratus, T. cyaneus, T.<br />

flavipes, T. geranii), Ormyridae – 2 (Ormyrus nitidulus and O. pomaceus), Pteromalidae – 9<br />

(Cyrtoptyx robustus, Cecidostiba fungosa, C. semifascia, Hobbya stenonota, Mesopolobus<br />

albitarsus, M. amaenus, M. fasciiventris, M. sericeus, M. tibialis), Eupelmidae – 6 (Eupelmus<br />

annulatus, E. cerri, E. matranus, E. rostratus, E. urozonus, E. vesicularis), Eulophidae – 11<br />

(Aulogymnus arsames, A. gallarum, A. testaceoviridis, A. trilineatus, Cirrospilus viticola,<br />

Closterocerus trifasciatus, Pediobius rotundatus, P. lysis, Aprostocetus sp., Aprostocetus sp.<br />

nr domenichinii, Baryscapus berhidanus). Around 106 species <strong>of</strong> chalcids and ichneumonids<br />

are recorded from oak cynipid galls in the Western Palaearctic, mainly in Europe which from<br />

near 50% <strong>of</strong> known species occur in Iran also.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Oak cynipid gall inquilines <strong>of</strong> Iran (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae: Synergini)<br />

Majid Tavakoli 1 *, George Melika, S. Ebrahim Sadeghi, Juli Pujade-Villar, Graham N. Stone, Hassan<br />

Barimani, Davood Aligholizadeh, Ali asghar Dordaii, Hamid Yarmand, Mohammad Reza Zargaran &<br />

Seadat Mozafarian<br />

1 Lorestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center, Khorramabad, Lorestan, P.O.Box: 348, Iran;<br />

majide322@yahoo.com<br />

This study was carried out during 2001-2008. Six main species <strong>of</strong> Quercus were sampled: Q.<br />

infectoria, Q. macranthera, Q. petraea, (in Quercus s.s. section <strong>of</strong> oaks), and Q. brantii, Q.<br />

libani, Q. castaneifolia (in Cerris section oaks) in Zagross, Arasbaran, Fandoghlo, Andabil,<br />

Tarom Olya & S<strong>of</strong>la, and Caspian forests <strong>of</strong> Iran. Eighty two (82) oak gallwasp species were<br />

found on different oak species in Iran. Fifteen known cynipid inquiline species associated<br />

with oak cynipid galls (Hymenoptera, Cynipidae: Synergini and Cynipini), were recorded for<br />

the Iranian cynipid fauna: Ceroptres cerri Mayr, C. clavicornis Hartig, Saphonecrus haimi<br />

(Mayr), Synergus gallaepomiformis (B. de Fonsc.), S. pallidipennis Mayr, S. pallipes Hartig,<br />

S. reinhardi Mayr, S. thaumacerus (Dalman), S. umbraculus (Olivier) and S. variabilis Mayr.<br />

Five new species <strong>of</strong> cynipid inquilines were recently described (Sadeghi et al. 2006),<br />

Saphonecrus irani Melika & Pujade-Villar, Synergus acsi Melika & Pujade-Villar, Synergus<br />

bechtoldae Melika & Pujade-Villar, Synergus palmirae Melika & Pujade-Villar and Synergus<br />

mikoi Melika & Pujade-Villar. Recently morphological and molecular data was used to revise<br />

the inquiline genus Synophrus Hartig, 1843 members <strong>of</strong> which are notable for extensively<br />

modifying the structure <strong>of</strong> galls induced by oak gallwasp hosts on oaks in the section Cerris<br />

<strong>of</strong> Quercus subgenus Quercus in the Western Palaearctic (Pénzes et al. 2009). Previous<br />

taxonomic treatments have recognized three Western Palaearctic species <strong>of</strong> Synophrus: S.<br />

pilulae, S. politus and S. olivieri which from the two last species were known from Iran also.<br />

As the result <strong>of</strong> the revision, other two new species were described from Iran: S. libani Melika<br />

et Pujade-Villar and S. syriacus Melika et Pujade-Villar, thus the tiotal number <strong>of</strong> Synophrus<br />

species known from Iran is four while 19 inquiline species were recorded all together.<br />

____________________________________<br />

116


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Mitochondrial COI gene sequence in European Eumeninae wasps (Hymenoptera:<br />

Vespidae): intra-specific diversity and applicability for DNA barcoding<br />

Jurga Turinaviien¹, Anna Budrien², Eduardas Budrys¹ , ²* & Rita Radzeviit¹<br />

¹ Department <strong>of</strong> Zoology <strong>of</strong> Vilnius University, M.K.iurlionio 21/27, Vilnius LT-03101, Lithuania<br />

² Nature Research Centre, Akademijos 2, Vilnius LT-08412, Lithuania; ebudrys@ekoi.lt<br />

The aim <strong>of</strong> the study was to estimate the intra- and interspecific genetic variability within<br />

selected European Eumeninae wasps and to examine the utility <strong>of</strong> partial sequence <strong>of</strong> the<br />

mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit I gene (COI) for species barcoding and for<br />

assessment <strong>of</strong> intra-specific population structure at different geographic scales.<br />

Wasps <strong>of</strong> six cavity-nesting Eumeninae genera were reared from trap-nests exposed in seminatural<br />

and agricultural landscapes <strong>of</strong> 13 European countries, including Austria, Estonia,<br />

France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Lithuania, Poland, Serbia, Spain, Sweden, and<br />

United Kingdom. The specimens represented 19 species: Ancistrocerus antilope, A.<br />

claripennis, A. gazella, A. nigricornis, A. parietinus, A. trifasciatus, Discoelius dufourii, D.<br />

zonalis, Euodynerus notatus, E. posticus, E. quadrifasciatus, Leptochilus regulus,<br />

Symmorphus allobrogus, S. bifasciatus, S. crassicornis, S. debilitatus, S. gracilis, S. murarius,<br />

and Tachyancistrocerus rhodensis.<br />

DNA was extracted from wasp thoracic muscles according standard protocols. We amplified<br />

partial sequences <strong>of</strong> the COI gene (672bp). For 17 species, these sequences were established<br />

for the first time. They were compared using neighbour-joining (NJ) analysis, implemented in<br />

MEGA2.1. The haplotype networks for polymorphic species were constructed using the<br />

s<strong>of</strong>tware TCS 1.13.<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> the studied European species demonstrated a very limited intraspecific variation and<br />

formed discrete clusters in the NJ tree. Out <strong>of</strong> them, the highest haplotype diversity was found<br />

in Discoelius zonalis and Symmorphus bifasciatus. Haplotypes <strong>of</strong> some species, like<br />

Ancistrocerus trifasciatus, displayed geographic variations, however, in Discoelius zonalis and<br />

Symmorphus bifasciatus, the intra-specific variability did not demonstrate a geographic<br />

pattern.<br />

Previously published partial sequences <strong>of</strong> the COI gene <strong>of</strong> other (mostly Nearctic) eumenine<br />

species were retrieved from the GenBank database and included into NJ analysis. Overall NJ<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> distances among all representatives <strong>of</strong> the subfamily with known COI gene<br />

sequence resulted in a well resolved tree, with only two clades including more than one<br />

species. Our results demonstrate that the mtDNA COI gene sequence <strong>of</strong> Eumeninae wasps is<br />

useful for species barcoding and, for some species, may be applied for the intra-specific<br />

diversity studies.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Systematic and phylogeny <strong>of</strong> the endemic south-eastern Asiatic Pristaulacus<br />

comptipennis species group (Hymenoptera Evanioidea: Aulacidae)<br />

Giuseppe F. Turrisi 1* & David R. Smith 2<br />

1 University <strong>of</strong> Catania, CUTGANA, Section <strong>of</strong> Nature Reserve Management, via Terzora 8,<br />

95027 San Gregorio di Catania, Catania, Italy; turrisifabrizio@yahoo.it<br />

2 Systematic Entomology Laboratory, PSI, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture c/o<br />

National Museum <strong>of</strong> Natural History, Smithsonian Institution P.O. Box 37012, MRC-168 Washington, DC<br />

20013-7012, USA; sawfly2@aol.com<br />

117


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Aulacidae comprise some 221 extant species belonging to two genera: Aulacus Jurine, 1807,<br />

with 75 species and Pristaulacus Kieffer, 1900 (including the former Panaulix Benoit, 1984),<br />

with 146 species. Both genera are represented in all zoogeographic regions, except Antarctica<br />

(Smith, 2001, Contributions on Entomology, <strong>International</strong> 4(3): 261-319). Aulacidae are<br />

koinobiont endoparasitoids <strong>of</strong> wood-boring larvae <strong>of</strong> Hymenoptera and Coleoptera. Hosts are<br />

larval Xiphydriidae (Hymenoptera) and, most frequently, Buprestidae and Cerambycidae<br />

(Coleoptera). In south-eastern Asia, Aulacidae are essentially unexplored, and there is no<br />

comprehensive treatment, most all work being individual species descriptions or treatments <strong>of</strong><br />

a smaller geographic areas. Here we present the results <strong>of</strong> the first comprehensive research on<br />

the distinctive Pristaulacus comptipennis species-group, which is endemic to south-eastern<br />

Asia and occurs from Japan to China, Thailand, and Viet Nam. The group was shown to be<br />

monophyletic in the phylogenetic study by Turrisi et al. (2009, Invertebrate Systematics 23:<br />

27-59) and is mainly characterized by one autapomorphy, the more or less deep occipital<br />

median emargination <strong>of</strong> the head, which is most obvious in dorsal view. Based on our study,<br />

sixteen valid species are recognized, <strong>of</strong> which only 5 were previously described (type material<br />

examined), and 11 are newly described (from China, Laos, Thailand and Viet Nam).<br />

Phylogenetic analyses are based on a previous set <strong>of</strong> 79 morphological characters provided by<br />

Turrisi et al. (2009) plus 3 additional ones. Of this data set, 23 informative characters are<br />

selected and scored for analyses under different conditions (unordered, ordered, equal and<br />

implied weighting), using TNT for Parsimony Analysis. Two main large subgroups were<br />

retrieved, the first one (containing 5 species) having two tooth-like processes on the<br />

lateroventral margin <strong>of</strong> pronotum, anterior part <strong>of</strong> mesoscutum protruding and acutely shaped<br />

and six tooth-like processes on the claws; the other large clade ( with 11 species) is<br />

characterized by the long pronotum (height/length < 1.0) and the long petiole (length/width: ><br />

3.0). Other minor clades are identified and discussed. For all treated species a comprehensive<br />

illustrated key is proposed.<br />

____________________________________<br />

The gallwasp venom apparatus<br />

Hege Vårdal<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, Swedish Museum <strong>of</strong> Natural History, Box 50007, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden;<br />

hege.vardal@nrm.se<br />

Comparisons <strong>of</strong> the female venom apparatus in Cynipoid insect parasitoids and gall inducers<br />

show that the venom reservoir is most <strong>of</strong>ten relatively larger in the gall inducing females. The<br />

function <strong>of</strong> the venom in gall wasps is unknown and the present study aims at describing the<br />

ultrastructure <strong>of</strong> the venom apparatus as well as exploring possible functions <strong>of</strong> the venom.<br />

Light and transmission electron microscopy indicate that there are no muscles in the venom<br />

reservoir walls, and thus ejection <strong>of</strong> venom is probably controlled by the muscles <strong>of</strong> the<br />

ovipositor apparatus surrounding the venom apparatus unlike many other Hymenoptera which<br />

have independent muscle control <strong>of</strong> the venom apparatus. Thus the cynipoid venom is<br />

probably transferred to a host together with the eggs which may indicate that the venom is<br />

involved in host manipulation. Change in the physical appearance between the venom in the<br />

gland canal and the venom in the reservoir is observed and the glandular acitivity is<br />

apparently not restricted to the venom gland, but probably also occur in the reservoir wall.<br />

____________________________________<br />

118


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Record on Indian species <strong>of</strong> Trichogramma Westwood, along with two new species, their<br />

host range and application against forest insect pests<br />

Mohammad Yousuf<br />

Forest Entomology Division, Tropical Forest Research Institute, P.O. RFRC, Mandla Road, Jabalpur- 482021<br />

(Madhya Pradesh), India; yousuf_tfri@yahoo.com<br />

Genus Trichogramma Westwood, 1833, with the type species Trichogramma evanescens is<br />

belonging to the order Hymenoptera, with size ranging from 0.4-0.6 mm. Species <strong>of</strong><br />

Trichogramma have been utilized in biological control <strong>of</strong> insect pests all over the world.<br />

Major contributions on the release <strong>of</strong> Trichogramma spp. for biological control <strong>of</strong><br />

lepidopterous pests have been made in last three decades. Trichogramma spp. have been<br />

utilized against the insect pests <strong>of</strong> agricultural crops, commercial cash crops, orchards and<br />

forest insect pests as well. They control the population <strong>of</strong> harmful insects at egg stage. Hence,<br />

the release <strong>of</strong> Trichogramma spp., have been made extensively all over the world for<br />

biological control <strong>of</strong> lepidopterous pests.<br />

Systematic survey for screening the indigenous species <strong>of</strong> Trichogramma was carried out<br />

(2005-2008) from central India, covering Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Maharashtra and<br />

Orissa. Three species: T. breviciliata Yousuf & Hassan, T. latipennis Yousuf & Hassan and T.<br />

kankerensis Yousuf & Hassan have already been reported. Two more new species <strong>of</strong><br />

Trichogramma: T. breviflagellata sp.n. and T. paraplasseyensis sp.n., are being reported. The<br />

new species have been illustrated and described in detail. As a whole till date, twenty six<br />

species <strong>of</strong> Trichogramma (T. achaeae Nagaraja & Nagarkatti, T. agriae Nagaraja, T.<br />

breviciliata Yousuf & Hassan, T. brevifringiata Yousuf & Shafee, T. chilonis Ishii, T.<br />

chilotraeae Nagaraja & Nagarkatti, T. convolvuli Nagaraja, T. cuttackensis Nagaraja, T.<br />

danausicida Nagaraja, T. flandersi Nagaraja & Nagarkatti, T. hebbalensis Nagaraja, T.<br />

hesperidis Nagaraja , T. japonicum (Ashmead), T. kankerensis Yousuf & Hassan, T.<br />

kashmirica Nagaraja et. al., T. latipennis Yousuf & Hassan, T. manii Nagaraja & Gupta, T.<br />

pallidiventris Nagaraja, T. plasseyensis Nagaraja, T. poliae Nagaraja, T. raoi Nagaraja, T.<br />

sankarani Nagaraja, T. semblidis (Aurivillius) and T. thalense Pinto & Oatman including two<br />

new species, T. breviflagellata sp. n. and T. paraplasseyensis sp.n.) have been recorded from<br />

India. Host-range <strong>of</strong> all Trichogramma species, recorded from India has been up-dated.<br />

Laboratory culture <strong>of</strong> Trichogramma raoi, T. plasseyensis and T. breviciliata has been<br />

maintained on the eggs <strong>of</strong> Corcyra cephalonica and these have been tested against forest<br />

insect pests. Laboratory rearing <strong>of</strong> forest insect pests was also carried out. Eggs <strong>of</strong> forest<br />

insect pests (Hyblaea puera, Eutectona machaeralis and Hasora alexis) were pasted on paper<br />

stripes (100 eggs on each 2X 7 cm stripe with ten replications) and introduced Trichogramma<br />

species in each case having a set <strong>of</strong> one and five pairs <strong>of</strong> Trichogramma wasps. All three<br />

species <strong>of</strong> Trichogramma accepted the eggs <strong>of</strong> insect pests, introduced for testing. Results on<br />

the laboratory efficacy <strong>of</strong> Trichogramma raoi, T. plasseyensis and T. breviciliata against teak<br />

defoliator (Hyblaea puera) and teak skeletonizer (Eutectona machaeralis), and<br />

Trichogramma breviciliata against defoliator <strong>of</strong> Holoptelia integrifolia (Hasora alexis) have<br />

been discussed in detail.<br />

Field efficacy <strong>of</strong> five Trichogramma was carried out in teak forest against teak skeletonizer<br />

(E. machaeralis) by releasing these wasps in 1.5 lakhs/ha, with four replications, having plot<br />

size <strong>of</strong> one ha each with buffer <strong>of</strong> two ha; for three years. Skeletonization <strong>of</strong> teak leaves in the<br />

released teak forest area was reduced about 50 % and details on results obtained on field<br />

efficacy <strong>of</strong> Trichogramma raoi along with T. chilonis, T. brasiliensis, T. japonicum and T.<br />

120


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

pretiosum, commonly utilized species in biological control programmes, against teak<br />

skeletonizer has also been discussed.<br />

____________________________________<br />

Hymenopterans on tree barks along climatic and altitudinal gradients in Ecuador<br />

Dominique Zimmermann 1* & Juergen Schmidl 2<br />

1 Naturhistorisches Museum Wien, Burgring 7, A-1010 Vienna, Austria;<br />

dominique.zimmermann@nhm-wien.ac.at<br />

2 University <strong>of</strong> Erlangen-Nuremberg, Dept. Biology, Staudtstr. 5, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany;<br />

jschmidl@bi<strong>of</strong>orm.de<br />

In the present study Hymenopterans collected in the course <strong>of</strong> the MACAG-Project<br />

(“Monitoring <strong>of</strong> Arthropods along Climate and Altitude Gradients”) are studied. The<br />

MACAG-Project aims at monitoring and evaluating climate change and altitudinal gradient<br />

driven impacts on the arthropod faunas on undamaged tree barks in primeval and near-tonature<br />

forests.<br />

In this context we analysed the composition <strong>of</strong> the Hymenoptera collected in 2007 in sic plots<br />

(10 x 10 m, 10-12 trees each) in Podocarpus NP in SE-Ecuador at three different altitudes<br />

(rainforest 1000 m, mountain rain forest 2000 m and Páramo 3000 m). On 71 trees 131<br />

specimens out <strong>of</strong> 97 species and 16 families were found, displaying a substantial singleton<br />

proportion. This pattern indicates a high level <strong>of</strong> trophic position <strong>of</strong> the recorded – almost<br />

solely parasitoid – Hymenoptera in the bark fauna-foodweb, where mites (mostly grazers and<br />

predators) and beetles (mostly fungi feeders and mite-predators) are the dominant groups<br />

worldwide (unpubl. data Schmidl).<br />

In contrast to the low specimen-species-ratio <strong>of</strong> 1.15 in Hymenoptera, the beetle fauna <strong>of</strong> the<br />

same 71 sampled tree barks has a specimen-species-ratio <strong>of</strong> 3.0. This corroborates the<br />

assumption that the low abundance is a foodweb matter – thus a functional rarity – and not<br />

only the typical rarity <strong>of</strong> tropical rainforest insects (“singleton problem”). Total abundance<br />

(Coleoptera: 940 specimens, Hymenoptera: 131 specimens) gives additional evidence and<br />

highlights the different biology <strong>of</strong> these two mega-diverse insects orders.<br />

The diversity pattern <strong>of</strong> Hymenoptera along the altitudinal gradient shows the highest species<br />

number at mid elevation (very similar to the beetle results), with (on average) 12.5 species per<br />

plot at 1000 m (rainforest), 27 sp. at 2000 m (mountain rain forest), and 12 sp. at 3000 m<br />

(Páramo), reflecting the structural properties <strong>of</strong> the forest and richness <strong>of</strong> the tree bark<br />

vegetation as trophic basis. Nevertheless, the specimen-species-ratio (between 1.04 and 1.33)<br />

does differ more between plots <strong>of</strong> the same altitudinal level than between altitudes, supporting<br />

the “functional rarity” stated above. A Soerensen-Index calculation reveals that there is almost<br />

no similarity between the Hymenoptera species sets <strong>of</strong> the three altitudinal levels, and also<br />

extremely low between plots <strong>of</strong> the same levels, a logical consequence <strong>of</strong> the low specimenspecies-ratios.<br />

A similar diversity pattern is reflected on family-level: The highest diversity was also found at<br />

2000 m with 12 <strong>of</strong> 16 families, followed by 1000 m with 11 and 3000 m with 8 families.<br />

Further sample analyses with more than 250 additional samples from 2008 and 2009 will<br />

allow deeper insights into diversity patterns and total species richness, using rarefaction and<br />

multivariate methods on a broader data basis.<br />

121


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

PARTICIPANTS<br />

Abraham, Rudolf<br />

Zoologisches Museum Hamburg, Martin-Luther-King-Platz 3, 20146 Hamburg, Germany;<br />

abraham@zoologie.uni-hamburg.de<br />

Achterberg van, Kees<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Terrestrial Zoology, Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum, Postbus 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The<br />

Netherlands; achterberg@naturalis.nnm.nl<br />

Ács, Zoltán<br />

Fitolab Plant Pest Diagnostic and Advisory Ltd., Istenhegyi út 29., Budapest H-1125 Hungary;<br />

acs.zoltan@gmail.com<br />

Agosti, Donat<br />

Plazi, Switzerland/Iran; agosti@amnh.org<br />

Alizadeh, Esmaeil<br />

Agricultural and Natural Resource Research Center <strong>of</strong> West Azerbaijan, P.O.Box:365 Urmia, Iran;<br />

ISM478@yahoo.com<br />

Askew, Richard R.<br />

5, Beeston Hall Mews, Beeston, Tarporley, Cheshire CW6 9TZ, England; olynx@btinternet.com<br />

Austin, Andrew D.<br />

Australian Centre for Evolutionary Biology and Biodiversity, School <strong>of</strong> Earth and Environmental Sciences, The<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Adelaide, Australia; andy.austin@adelaide.edu.au<br />

Bariaçik, Nil<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Nide, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Science and Arts, Department <strong>of</strong> Biology, TR-51100 Nide, Turkey;<br />

nilbagriacik@hotmail.com<br />

Barkan Nezahat Pınar<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Biology, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Science, Hacettepe University, 06800 Beytepe, Ankara, Turkey;<br />

pinarbarkan@gmail.com<br />

Barsagade, Deepak D.<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Zoology, RTM Nagpur University, Nagpur 440033 India; dr_ddbars@rediffmail.com<br />

Baur, Hannes<br />

Natural History Museum, Bernastrasse 15, 3005 Bern, Switzerland; hannes.baur@nmbe.ch<br />

Bertone, Matthew A.<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA;<br />

matthew.bertone@gmail.com<br />

Bihari, Péter<br />

Biological Research Center <strong>of</strong> Hungarian Academy <strong>of</strong> Sciences, Institute <strong>of</strong> Genetics, Szeged, Hungary;<br />

bihari.peter@gmail.com<br />

Blank, Stephan M.<br />

Deutsches Entomologisches Institut, Eberswalder Str. 90, 15374 Müncheberg, Germany;<br />

sblank@senckenberg.de<br />

Bosio, Giovanni<br />

Phytosanitary Service, Piedmont Region, via Livorno 60, Torino 10044 Italy;<br />

giovanni.bosio@regione.piemonte.it<br />

122


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Boyadzhiev, Peter S.<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Zoology, University <strong>of</strong> Plovdiv “P. Hilendarski”, Plovdiv 4000, Bulgaria; boyadz@uniplovdiv.bg<br />

Brady, Seán<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, National Museum <strong>of</strong> Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC,<br />

USA; bradys@si.edu<br />

Breitkreuz, Laura<br />

Museum für Naturkunde, Leibniz-Institut für Evolutions- und Biodiversitätsforschung an der Humboldt-<br />

Universität zu Berlin, Invalidenstraße 43, 10115 Berlin, Germany; laura.breitkreuz@mfn-berlin.de<br />

Broad, Gavin R.<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, the Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK;<br />

g.broad@nhm.ac.uk<br />

Brothers, Denis J.<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Biological and Conservation Sciences, University <strong>of</strong> KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa;<br />

brothers@ukzn.ac.za<br />

Budrien, Anna<br />

Nature Research Centre, Akademijos 2, Vilnius LT-08412, Lithuania; ebudrys@ekoi.lt<br />

Budrys, Eduardas<br />

Nature Research Centre, Akademijos 2, Vilnius LT-08412, Lithuania and Dept. <strong>of</strong> Zoology <strong>of</strong> Vilnius<br />

University, M.K.iurlionio 21/27, Vilnius LT-03101, Lithuania; ebudrys@ekoi.lt<br />

Buffington, Matthew L.<br />

Systematic Entomology Laboratory, ARS-USDA, c/o National Museum <strong>of</strong> Natural History, Smithsonian<br />

Institution, Washington, DC, USA; matt.buffington@ars.usda.gov<br />

Carpenter, James M.<br />

American Museum <strong>of</strong> Natural History, NYC, USA; carpente@amnh.org<br />

Cruaud, Astrid<br />

INRA-UMR Centre de Biologie et de Gestion des Populations, CBGP, (INRA/IRD/CIRAD/Montpellier<br />

SupAgro), Campus international de Baillarguet, CS 30016, 34988 Montferrier-sur Lez, France;<br />

cruaud@supagro.inra.fr<br />

Csóka, György<br />

Hungarian Forest Research Institute, Mátrafüred Research Station, 3232 Mátrafüred, Hungary; csokagy@erti.hu<br />

Cssz, Sándor<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Zoology, Hungarian Natural History Museum, Budapest, Hungary; csosz@zoo.zoo.nhmus.hu<br />

Deans, Andrew R.<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, North Carolina State University, Campus box 7613, Raleigh, NC 27609-7613,<br />

USA; andy_deans@ncsu.edu<br />

Delvare, Gérard<br />

Centre de Cooperation <strong>International</strong>e en Recherche Agronomique pour le Developpement, (Cirad TA A 55/L),<br />

UMR CBGP, Campus <strong>International</strong> de Baillarguet, 34398 Montpellier Cedex 5 France; gerard.delvare@cirad.fr<br />

Dias Filho, Manoel Martins<br />

Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, SP, Brazil; manoelmd@ufscar.br<br />

Donev, Atanas D.<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Zoology, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Biology, University <strong>of</strong> Plovdiv “Paisii Hilendarski”, Tsar Asen Str. 24, 4000<br />

Plovdiv, Bulgaria; atdonev@yahoo.com<br />

123


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Early, John<br />

Auckland Museum, Private Bag 92018, Auckland, New Zealand; jearly@aucklandmuseum.com<br />

Ernst, Andrew<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, North Carolina State University, Campus box 7613, Raleigh, NC 27609-7613,<br />

USA; ernsthausen@gmail.com<br />

Falco-Gari, Jose Vicente<br />

Instituto Cavanilles de Biodiversidad, Universitat de Valencia, Apartado Oficial 22085, 46071-Valencia, Spain;<br />

j.vicente.falco@uv.es<br />

Fernández-Triana, Jose L.<br />

Biodiversity Institute <strong>of</strong> Ontario, University <strong>of</strong> Guelph, Canada; jftriana@uoguelph.ca<br />

Forshage, Mattias<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, Swedish Museum <strong>of</strong> Natural History, Box 5007, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden;<br />

generelle.morphologie@gmail.com<br />

Fuentes-Utrilla, Pablo<br />

Institute <strong>of</strong> Cell, Animal and Population Biology, University <strong>of</strong> Edinburgh, Ashworth Laboratories, The King’s<br />

Buildings, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, UK; P.Fuentes@ed.ac.uk<br />

Fursov, Viktor N.<br />

Schmalhausen Institute <strong>of</strong> Zoology <strong>of</strong> National Academy <strong>of</strong> Sciences <strong>of</strong> Ukraine, Kiev, Ukraine;<br />

ufensia@gmail.com<br />

Fusu, Lucian<br />

Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Biology, Bd. Carol I nr. 11, 700506, Iai, Romania;<br />

lucfusu@hotmail.com<br />

Gadallah, Neveen Samy<br />

Entomology Department, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Science, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt; n_gadallah@yahoo.com<br />

Gess, Friedrich W.<br />

Curator Emeritus and Contract Researcher, Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology and Arachnology, Makana Biodiversity<br />

Centre, Albany Museum, Somerset Street, Grahamstown, 6139 South Africa; f.gess@ru.ac.za<br />

Gess, Sarah K.<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology and Arachnology, Makana Biodiversity Centre, Albany Museum, Somerset Street,<br />

Grahamstown, 6139 South Africa; s.gess@ru.ac.za<br />

Gibbs, Melanie<br />

CEH Wallingford, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford, Oxfordshire OX10 8BB UK; mela1@ceh.ac.uk<br />

Gibson, Gary A.P.<br />

Canadian National Collection <strong>of</strong> Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes (CNC), Agriculture & Agri-food Canada,<br />

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Gary.Gibson@agr.gov.ca<br />

Gokhman, Vladimir E.<br />

Botanical Garden, Moscow State University, Moscow 119991 Russia; gokhman@bg.msu.ru<br />

Gratiashvili, Nana<br />

Entomology and Biocontrol Research Centre <strong>of</strong> Ilia State University, 0179, Tbilisi, Georgia;<br />

nanagratiashvili@yahoo.com<br />

Gumovsky, Alex<br />

Schmalhausen Institute <strong>of</strong> Zoology, 15 Bogdan Khmelnitsky St., 01601 Kiev-30, Ukraine;<br />

gumovsky@izan.kiev.ua, entedon@gmail.com<br />

124


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Güler, Yasemin<br />

Plant Protection Central Research Institute, Gayret Mahallesi, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Bulvari, No: 66, 06172<br />

Yenimahalle/Ankara, Turkey; yaseminguler@gmail.com<br />

Gürbüz, Mehmet Faruk<br />

Süleyman Demirel University Department <strong>of</strong> Biology, Isparta, Turkey; mfg@fef.sdu.edu.tr<br />

Hansen, Lars Ove<br />

Natural History Museum, University <strong>of</strong> Oslo, POBox 1172 Blindern, NO-0318 Oslo, Norway;<br />

l.o.hansen@nhm.uio.no<br />

Hansson, Christer<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Biology, Zoology, Lund University, Sweden; Christer.Hansson@cob.lu.se<br />

Hearn, Jack<br />

Institute <strong>of</strong> Evolutionary Biology, University <strong>of</strong> Edinburgh, King's Buildings, West Mains Road, Edinburgh,<br />

EH9 3JF United Kingdom; J.Hearn@sms.ed.ac.uk<br />

Heraty, John<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, University <strong>of</strong> California Riverside, CA, USA; john.heraty@ucr.edu<br />

Hilszczaski, Jacek<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Forest Protection, Forest Research Institute, Sekocin Stary ul. Braci Lesnej 3 05-090 Raszyn,<br />

Poland; hilszczj@ibles.waw.pl<br />

Hirose, Yoshimi<br />

Faculty <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8581, Japan; hirosey@jcom.home.ne.jp<br />

Holy, Kamil<br />

Crop Research Institute, Drnovska 507, CZ-161 06 Prague, Czech Republic; holy@vurv.cz<br />

Hu, Hongying<br />

College <strong>of</strong> Life Science and Technology, Xinjiang University, Urumq, 830046 China; hoohyii@sina.com<br />

Huber, John T.<br />

Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; john.huber@agr.gc.ca<br />

Izquierdo Moya, Isabel<br />

Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Madrid, Spain; izquierdo@mncn.csic.es<br />

Jansta, Petr<br />

Faculty <strong>of</strong> Sciencies, Department <strong>of</strong> Zoology, Charles University, PrF UK, Vinicna 7, 12844 Praha 2, Czech<br />

Republic; janstapetr@gmail.com<br />

Japoshvili, George<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, Institute <strong>of</strong> Zoology, Ilia Chavchavadze State University, Tbilisi, Georgia;<br />

giorgij70@yahoo.com<br />

Jiao, Tian-Yang<br />

Institute <strong>of</strong> Zoology, Chinese Academy <strong>of</strong> Sciences, 1# Beichen West Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100101,<br />

China; jiaoty@ioz.ac.cn<br />

Jiménez-Peydro, Ricardo<br />

Instituto Cavanilles de Biodiversidad, Universitat de Valencia, Apdo. <strong>of</strong>icial 22085, 46071-Valencia, Spain;<br />

Ricardo.jimenez@uv.es<br />

Johnson, Norman F.<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Evolution, Ecology and Organismal Biology, The Ohio State University, 1315 Kinnear Road,<br />

Columbus, Ohio 43212 USA; johnson.2@osu.edu<br />

125


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Kanizsai, Orsolya<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Ecology, Szeged University, Szeged, Hungary; lot@c2.hu<br />

Karlsson, Dave<br />

Ärvingevägen 14, 164 46 Stockholm, Sweden; dave.karlsson@nrm.se<br />

Kirpik, Mehmet Ali<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Biology, Kafkas University, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Science and Letters, 36100 Kars-Turkey;<br />

kirpik80@hotmail.com<br />

Kirschey, Lukas<br />

Museum für Naturkunde Leibniz-Institut für Evolutions- und Biodiversitätsforschung an der Humbold-<br />

Univerität zu Berlin, Invalidenstrasse 43, D-10115 Berlin, Germany; lukas.kirschey@mfn-berlin.de<br />

Kittel, Rebecca<br />

Rosenstrasse 12, 26122 Oldenburg, Germany; rebecca.kittel@gmx.de<br />

Klopfstein, Seraina<br />

Naturhistorisches Museum Bern/Universität Bern, Switzerland; klopfstein@nmbe.ch<br />

Koçak, Erhan<br />

Plant Protection Central Research Institute, Ankara, Turkey; erhan_kocak@hotmail.com<br />

Kodan, Münevver<br />

Plant Protection Central Research Institute, Gayret Mah., Fatih Sultan Mehmet Bulv., No: 66, 06172,<br />

Yenimahalle/Ankara, Turkey; munevverkodan@gmail.com<br />

Kolesova, Natalia S.<br />

Vologda State Pedagogical University, Vologda, 160034 Russia; nbalukova@yandex.ru<br />

Konishi, Kazuhiko<br />

National Agricultural Research Center for Hokkaido Region, Japan; konishi@affrc.go.jp<br />

Kos, Katarina<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty, Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy, Jamnikarjeva 101, SI-1111 Ljubljana,<br />

Slovenia; katarina.kos@bf.uni-lj.si<br />

Krause, Stefanie<br />

Museum für Naturkunde, Leibniz-Institut für Evolutions- und Biodiversitätsforschung an der Humboldt-<br />

Universität zu Berlin, Invalidenstraße 43, 10115 Berlin, Germany; stefanie.krause@mfn-berlin.de<br />

Krogmann, Lars<br />

Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart, Germany; krogmann.smns@naturkundemuseum-bw.de<br />

Lelej, Arkady S.<br />

Institute <strong>of</strong> Biology and Soil Science, Russian Academy <strong>of</strong> Sciences, Far Eastern Branch, Vladivostok, Russia;<br />

lelej@biosoil.ru<br />

Liljeblad, Johan<br />

Swedish Species Information Centre, Swedish Agricultural University, P.O.Box 7007, SE-750 07 Uppsala,<br />

Sweden; cynips@gmail.com<br />

L<strong>of</strong>fredo, Ana Paula da Silva<br />

Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, SP, Brazil; ap_l<strong>of</strong>fredo@yahoo.com.br<br />

Lohrmann, Volker<br />

Museum für Naturkunde, Leibniz-Institut für Evolutions- und Biodiversitätsforschung an der Humboldt-<br />

Universität zu Berlin, Invalidenstraße 43, D-10115 Berlin, Germany; volker.lohrmann@mfn-berlin.de<br />

126


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Lohse, Konrad<br />

Institute <strong>of</strong> Evolutionary Biology, University <strong>of</strong> Edinburgh, King’s Buildings, West Mains Road, EH9 3JT, UK;<br />

K.R.Lohse@sms.ed.ac.uk<br />

Lotfalizadeh, Hosseinali<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Plant Protection, College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz Branch, Tabriz, Iran;<br />

lotfalizadeh2001@yahoo.com<br />

Magnusson, Pelle<br />

Påboda 709, 385 90 SÖDERÅKRA Sweden; yonkyo19@hotmail.com<br />

Masnadi-Yazdinejad, Ashkan<br />

Insect Taxonomy Research Department, Iranian Research Institute <strong>of</strong> Plant Protection, Tehran, POBox:<br />

153951454 Iran; masnadi@iripp.ir<br />

Matsumoto, Rikio<br />

Osaka Museum <strong>of</strong> Natural History, Nagai Park 1-23, Higashisumiyoshi-ku, Osaka, 546-0034, Japan;<br />

rikio@mus-nh.city.osaka.jp<br />

Matsuo, Kazunori<br />

Entomological Laboratory, Graduate School <strong>of</strong> Bioresource and Bioenvironmental Sciences, Kyushu University,<br />

Fukuoka 812-8581, Japan; k_matsuo@agr.kyushu-u.ac.jp<br />

Mehrnejad, M. Reza<br />

Pistachio Research Institute, P.O. Box 77175.435, Rafsanjan, Iran; reza_mehrnejad@hotmail.com<br />

Melika, George<br />

Pest Diagnostic Laboratory, Tanakajd, Hungary; melikageorge@gmail.com<br />

Mete, Özlem<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Biology, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Science, Hacettepe University, 06800 Beytepe, Ankara, Turkey;<br />

ozlemmete83@gmail.com<br />

Mikó, István<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, North Carolina State University, Campus box 7613, Raleigh, NC 27609-7613,<br />

USA; istvan.miko@gmail.com<br />

Mishchenko, Andrey<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Zoology, State Pedagogical University, Ulyanovsk, 432700 Russia<br />

Mitroiu, Mircea-Dan<br />

Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Biology, Bd. Carol I 20A, 700505 Iasi, Romania;<br />

mircea.mitroiu@uaic.ro<br />

Mosel, Silke<br />

Museum für Naturkunde – Leibniz-Institut für Evolutions- und Biodiversitaetsforschung an der Humboldt-<br />

Universitaet zu Berlin, Invalidenstrasse 43, D- 10115 Berlin, Germany; silke.mosel@mfn-berlin.de<br />

Mottern, Jason L.<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, University <strong>of</strong> California, Riverside, CA, USA; jmott002@student.ucr.edu<br />

Mullins, Patricia L.<br />

North Carolina State University, Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA; Plmullin@ncsu.edu<br />

Murray, Elizabeth<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, University <strong>of</strong> California Riverside, CA, USA; elizabeth.murray@email.ucr.edu<br />

Musetti, Luciana<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Evolution, Ecology and Organismal Biology, The Ohio State University, 1315 Kinnear Road,<br />

Columbus, Ohio 43212 USA; musetti.2@osu.edu<br />

127


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Nakamura, Satoshi<br />

Japan <strong>International</strong> Research Centre for Agricultural Sciences, 1-1 Ohwashi, Tsukuba, 305-8686 Japan;<br />

s.nakamura@affrc.go.jp<br />

Nicholls, James A.<br />

Institute <strong>of</strong> Evolutionary Biology, Ashworth Labs, King’s Buildings, University <strong>of</strong> Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9<br />

3JT UK; james.nicholls@ed.ac.uk<br />

Nieves-Aldrey, José Luis<br />

Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC), Departamento de Biodiversidad y Biología Evolutiva, C/ José<br />

Gutiérrez Abascal 2, ES-28006 Madrid, Spain; aldrey@mncn.csic.es<br />

Noyes, John S.<br />

Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, England, UK; jsn@nhm.ac.uk<br />

Ohl, Michael<br />

Museum für Naturkunde, Leibniz-Institut für Evolutions- und Biodiversitätsforschung an der Humboldt-<br />

Universität zu Berlin, Invalidenstraße 43, 10115 Berlin, Germany; michael.ohl@mfn-berlin.de<br />

Österblad, Ika<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Helsinki, Department <strong>of</strong> Biological and Environmental Sciences, P.O Box 65 (Viikinkaari 1), FI-<br />

00014 Helsinki, Finland; ika.osterblad@helsinki.fi<br />

Özgen, nanç<br />

Plant Protection Department <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Faculty <strong>of</strong> Dicle University, Diyarbakır, Turkey;<br />

inancoz@hotmail.com<br />

Penev, Lyubomir<br />

ZooKeys Managing Editor, Pens<strong>of</strong>t Publishers, 13a Geo Milev Street, 1111 S<strong>of</strong>ia, Bulgaria;<br />

lyubo.penev@gmail.com, info@pens<strong>of</strong>t.net<br />

Penteado-Dias, Angélica Maria<br />

Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, SP, Brazil; angelica@ufscar.br<br />

Pénzes, Zsolt<br />

Biological Research Center <strong>of</strong> Hungarian Academy <strong>of</strong> Sciences, Institute <strong>of</strong> Genetics, Szeged, Hungary/<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Ecology, Szeged University, Szeged, Hungary; penzes@bio.u-szeged.hu<br />

Peris-Felipo, Francisco Javier<br />

Entomology and Pest Control Laboratory, Cavanilles Institute <strong>of</strong> Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Valencia, Spain; Francisco.peris@uv.es<br />

Peters, Ralph S.<br />

Zoologisches Museum Hamburg, Martin-Luther-King-Platz 3, 20146 Hamburg, Germany;<br />

ralph.peters@uni-hamburg.de<br />

Pickett, Kurt Milton<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Biology, University <strong>of</strong> Vermont, 120A Marsh Life Science Building, 109 Carrigan Drive,<br />

Burlington, VT 05405, USA; kurt.pickett@uvm.edu<br />

Popescu, Irinel E.<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Zoology and Ecology, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Biology, “Al. I. Cuza” University, Iasi, Romania;<br />

irinellus@yahoo.com<br />

Popovici, Ovidiu Alin<br />

“Al. I. Cuza” University, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Biology, Iasi, Romania; popovici_alin_ovidiu@yahoo.com<br />

Pricop, Emilian<br />

“Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Biology, Bd. Carol I 20a, 700505 Iai, Romania;<br />

pricopemilian@yahoo.com<br />

128


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Pujade-Villar, Juli<br />

Universitat de Barcelona, Facultat de Biologia, Dpt. Biologia Animal, Avda Diagonal-645, 08028-Barcelona,<br />

Spain; jpujade@ub.edu<br />

Quicke, Donald L.J.<br />

Division <strong>of</strong> Biology, Imperial College, c/o The Natural History Museum; Cromwell Rd., London, UK;<br />

d.quicke@imperial.ac.uk<br />

Rasplus, Jean-Yves<br />

INRA-UMR Centre de Biologie et de Gestion des Populations, CBGP, (INRA/IRD/CIRAD/Montpellier<br />

SupAgro), Campus international de Baillarguet, CS 30016, 34988 Montferrier-sur Lez, France;<br />

rasplus@supagro.inra.fr<br />

Reshchikov, Alexey<br />

Entomology Department, St Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya nab., 7/9, St Petersburg, 19903<br />

Russia; lerth@yandex.ru<br />

Sadeghi, S. Ebrahim<br />

Research Institute <strong>of</strong> Forest and Rangelands, Tehran, POBox 13185-116, Iran; ebrasadeghi@gmail.com<br />

Schauff, Michael<br />

Plant Sciences Institute, ARS, USDA, Bldg 003, rm 231, BARC-W, Beltsville MD 20705 USA;<br />

mike.schauff@ars.usda.gov<br />

Schick, Katherine N.<br />

Essig Museum <strong>of</strong> Entomology, 211 Wellman Hall, 3112, University <strong>of</strong> California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3112,<br />

USA; kaschick@berkeley.edu<br />

Schmidt, Justin O.<br />

Southwestern Biological Institute, 1961 W. Brichta Dr., Tucson, AZ 85745, USA; ponerine@dakotacom.net<br />

Schmidt, Stefan<br />

Zoologische Staatssammlung, Münchhausenstr. 21, 81247 Munich, Germany; Hymenoptera@zsm.mwn.de<br />

Schönrogge, Karsten<br />

Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford, MacLean Building, Benson Lane, Wallingford, OXON, OX10<br />

8BB, UK; ksc@ceh.ac.uk<br />

Schwarzfeld, Marla D.<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Biological Sciences, University <strong>of</strong> Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada;<br />

marla.schwarzfeld@ualberta.ca<br />

Seltmann, Katja<br />

North Carolina State University, Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA;<br />

katja_seltmann@ncsu.edu<br />

Sharanowski, Barbara J.<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, North Carolina State University, Campus box 7613, Raleigh, NC 27609-7613,<br />

USA; Barb.Sharanowski@gmail.com<br />

Sharkey, Michael J.<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, University <strong>of</strong> Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 40546, USA; msharkey@uky.edu<br />

Shaw, Mark R.<br />

National Museums <strong>of</strong> Scotland, Edinburgh, UK; markshaw@xenarcha.com<br />

Shayesteh, Nouraddin<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, Agricultural and Natural Resources Faculty <strong>of</strong> Islamic Azad University, Branch <strong>of</strong><br />

Mahabad. P.O.Box: 59135-443 Mahabad, IRAN; pr<strong>of</strong>shayesteh@yahoo.com<br />

129


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Shevtsova, Ekaterina<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Biology, Zoology, Lund University, Sweden; Ekaterina.Shevtsova@cob.lu.se<br />

Sinclair, Frazer<br />

Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford, OX10 8BB, c/o University <strong>of</strong> Edinburgh, UK; FRNC@ceh.ac.uk<br />

Soon, Villu<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Zoology, Institute <strong>of</strong> Ecology and Earth Sciences, University <strong>of</strong> Tartu, Vanemuise 46, Tartu<br />

51014, Estonia; villu.soon@ut.ee<br />

Szabó, Gyula<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Ecology, University <strong>of</strong> Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Egyetem tér 1, Hungary;<br />

safranek85@gmail.com<br />

Stigenberg, Julia<br />

Swedish Museum <strong>of</strong> Natural History, Stockholm, Sweden; Julia.stigenberg@nrm.se<br />

Stojanova, Anelia<br />

Plovdiv University, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Biology, Department <strong>of</strong> Zoology, Plovdiv 4000, Bulgaria;<br />

stanelia@uni-plovdiv.bg<br />

Stone, Graham N.<br />

Institute <strong>of</strong> Cell, Animal and Population Biology, University <strong>of</strong> Edinburgh, Ashworth Laboratories, The King’s<br />

Buildings, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, United Kingdom; Graham.stone@ed.ac.uk<br />

Taeger, Andreas<br />

Deutsches Entomologisches Institut, Eberswalder Str. 90, 15374 Müncheberg, Germany;<br />

ataeger@senckenberg.de<br />

Taekul, Charuwat<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, The Ohio State University, 1315 Kinnear Road, Columbus, Ohio 43212, USA;<br />

taekul.1@osu.edu<br />

Takasuka, Keizo<br />

Entomological Laboratory, Faculty <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Ehime University, Matsuyama, Ehime 790-8566, Japan;<br />

ichneumonidae@gmail.com<br />

Talamas, Elijah J.<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, The Ohio State University, 1315 Kinnear Road, Columbus, Ohio 43212, USA;<br />

talamas.1@osu.edu<br />

Tang, Chang-Ti<br />

National Chung-Hsing University, Kuo Kuang Rd. 250, Taichung 40227, Taiwan; cynipidsman@gmail.com<br />

Tavakoli, Majid<br />

Lorestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center, Khorramabad, Lorestan, P.O.Box: 348, Iran;<br />

majide322@yahoo.com<br />

Triapitsyn, Serguei V.<br />

Entomology Research Museum, Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology, University <strong>of</strong> California, Riverside,<br />

CA, 92521, USA; serguei.triapitsyn@ucr.edu<br />

Turrisi, Giuseppe Fabrizio<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Catania, C.U.T.G.A.N.A., Laboratorio Naturalistico Ambientale "Natura e Scienza", via Terzora 8<br />

– 95027 San Gregorio di Catania, c/o Nature Reserve "Vallone di Piano della Corte" (Sicilia, Enna, Agira, Italy;<br />

turrisifabrizio@yahoo.it<br />

Van Noort, Simon<br />

Division <strong>of</strong> Natural History, Iziko South African Museum, PO Box 61, Cape Town 8000, South Africa;<br />

svannoort@iziko.org.za<br />

130


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Abe, Y., 5, 13, 45, 119<br />

Abraham, R., 13, 107, 122<br />

Achterberg van, K., 4, 7, 15, 56, 122<br />

Ács, Z., 5, 59, 122<br />

Adjami, Y., 5, 49<br />

Agosti, D., 4, 9, 15, 24, 122<br />

Ahmad, R.S., 6, 30<br />

Akpinar, A.E., 11, 84<br />

Albadalejo, C.M., 11, 87<br />

Aligholizadeh, D., 13, 112, 115, 116<br />

Alizadeh, E., 10, 72, 122<br />

Alma, A., 5, 20<br />

Altenh<strong>of</strong>er, E., 4, 20<br />

Andersen, A.N., 13, 114<br />

Arnedo, M.A., 5, 49<br />

Askary, H., 13, 112<br />

Askew, R.R., 6, 10, 11, 13, 16, 82, 83,115, 122<br />

Assareh, M.A., 13, 112<br />

Atahan, T., 13, 115<br />

Austin, A.D., 4, 7, 8, 13, 38, 44, 65, 114, 122<br />

Aytekin, A.M., 8, 10, 33, 72<br />

Azevedo, C.O., 9, 24<br />

Azizkhani, E., 13, 112<br />

Bariaçik, N., 8, 17, 122<br />

Barimani, H., 13, 112, 115, 116<br />

Barjadze, S., 11, 83<br />

Barkan, N.P., 10, 72, 122<br />

Barsagade, D.D., 3, 18, 122<br />

Baur, H., 3, 18, 122<br />

Ben Jamâa, M.L., 5, 49<br />

Bertone, M.A., 3, 10, 44, 53, 69, 73, 122<br />

Beyaraslan, A., 6, 47<br />

Bihari, P., 5, 6, 19, 29, 59, 122<br />

Blank, S.M., 4, 20, 122<br />

Blaxter, M., 5, 34, 59<br />

Bolu, H., 12, 104<br />

Borner, J., 9, 47<br />

Bosio, G., 5, 21, 122<br />

Bouhraoua, R., 5, 49<br />

Boukreris, F., 5, 49<br />

Boyadzhiev, P.S., 10, 73, 123<br />

Brabant, C.M., 9, 24<br />

Brady, S.G., 3, 5, 22, 23, 123<br />

Breitkreuz, L., 10, 74, 123<br />

Broad, G.R., 4, 6, 22, 24, 66, 123<br />

Brothers, D.J., 7, 9, 23, 24, 123<br />

Brussino, G., 5, 20<br />

Budrien, A., 10, 12, 13, 74, 75, 76, 101, 117, 123<br />

Budrys, E., 10, 12, 13, 74, 75, 76, 101, 117, 123<br />

Buffington, M.L., 4, 5, 12, 23, 49, 104, 123<br />

Index to Authors <strong>of</strong> Papers and Posters<br />

(bold = abstract)<br />

132


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Burks, R.A., 9, 11, 34, 94<br />

Büyükakka, S., 8, 17<br />

Cano, J.M., 11, 87<br />

Carmichael, A., 12, 101<br />

Carpenter, J.M., 9, 24, 48, 53, 123<br />

Catapano, T., 4, 15<br />

Cavers, S., 5, 55<br />

Ceccarelli, F.S., 6, 71<br />

Challis, R., 5, 59<br />

Chesters, D., 4, 24<br />

Ciornei, C., 4, 20<br />

Civelek, H.S., 13, 115<br />

Condon, M., 4, 67<br />

Constantineanu, I., 4, 20<br />

Constantineanu, R., 4, 20<br />

Couloux, A., 8, 26<br />

Cruaud, A., 8, 26, 123<br />

Csóka, Gy., 4, 20, 59, 123<br />

Cssz, S., 9, 27, 123<br />

Da Rong, Y., 8, 26<br />

Deans, A.R., 3, 7, 9, 10,28,44,45,53,69,73,123<br />

Delvare, G., 3, 4, 27, 42, 123<br />

DeMartini, J.D., 5, 45<br />

Demirsoy, A., 12, 99<br />

De Jesús-Bonilla, V.S., 6, 71<br />

Dias Filho, M.M., 10, 12, 76, 105, 123<br />

Dikmen, F., 8, 33<br />

Doczkal, D., 3, 18<br />

Donev, A.D., 10, 73, 123<br />

Donnellan, S.C., 4, 13, 44, 114<br />

Dordaii, A.A., 13, 112, 115, 116<br />

Dowling, A.P.G., 9, 53<br />

Dubois, J., 9, 24<br />

Eardley, C., 8, 65<br />

Early, J.W., 10, 77, 124<br />

El-Heneidy, A., 6, 30<br />

Ernst, A., 3, 7, 28, 53, 124<br />

Ernst, J., 6, 29<br />

Erwin, T.L., 6, 66<br />

Falco-Gari, J.V., 10, 12, 77, 78, 106, 107, 124<br />

Fernández-Triana, J., 4, 6, 24, 28, 35, 56, 124<br />

Ferracini, C., 5, 20<br />

Forshage, M., 5, 29, 124<br />

Fritzén, N.R., 12, 103<br />

Fuentes-Utrilla, P., 6, 29, 124<br />

Fursov, V.N., 10, 79, 80, 124<br />

Fusu, L., 10, 78, 124<br />

Gadallah, N.S., 6, 30, 124<br />

Gauld, I.D., 4, 24<br />

Gechev, T.S. 10, 73<br />

Genson, G., 8, 26<br />

Geraldo, M., 10, 76<br />

Gess, F.W., 10, 81, 124<br />

133


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Gess, S.K., 10, 81, 124<br />

Gibbs, M., 124<br />

Gibson, G.A.P., 3, 31, 44, 124<br />

Gokhman, V.E., 7, 10, 31, 82, 124<br />

Golestaneh, R., 13, 112<br />

Gómez, I., 6, 66<br />

Gómez, J.F., 10, 11, 82, 83<br />

Goulet, H., 4, 56<br />

Gratiashvili, N., 11, 83, 124<br />

Gumovsky, A., 6, 32, 124<br />

Guz, N., 11, 84<br />

Güler, Y., 8, 33, 125<br />

Gürbüz, M.F., 6, 33, 125<br />

Gürkan, M.O., 7, 11, 37, 84<br />

Haghighian, F., 11, 85<br />

Hallwachs, W., 4, 24, 56<br />

Hansen, L.O., 125<br />

Hansson, C., 3, 13, 54, 113, 125<br />

Hara, H., 4, 20<br />

Hawks, D., 9, 12, 53, 101<br />

Hayward, A., 5, 59<br />

Hearn, J., 5, 34, 125<br />

Hebert, P.D.N., 4, 24, 56<br />

Heraty, J.M., 6, 9, 12, 34, 53, 67, 100, 101, 125<br />

Herrera Flórez, A.F., 10, 76<br />

Hilszczaski, J., 11, 85, 125<br />

Hirose, Y., 6, 35, 125<br />

Holy, K., 11, 86, 125<br />

Hopper, K.R., 6, 67<br />

Horváth, R., 13, 114<br />

Hrcek, J., 4, 24, 56<br />

Hu, H., 11, 86, 125<br />

Huber, J.T., 4, 35, 56, 125<br />

Huflejt, T., 4, 20<br />

Ichiki, R.T., 12, 102<br />

Izquierdo Moya, I., 11, 87, 125<br />

Jabbour-Zahab, R., 8, 26<br />

Jakše, J., 11, 93<br />

Janšta, P., 11, 88, 125<br />

Janzen, D., 4, 24, 56<br />

Japoshvili, G., 11, 88, 125<br />

Jiao, T.-Y., 11, 89, 125<br />

Jimenez-Peydro, R., 10, 12, 77, 78, 106, 107, 125<br />

Johnson, N.F., 7, 36, 60, 61, 65, 125<br />

Kanizsai, O., 125<br />

Karlsson, D., 11, 89, 126<br />

Kazemi, M.-H., 12, 96<br />

Kerdelhué, C., 8, 26<br />

Kiritani, K., 12, 98<br />

Kirpik, M.A., 11, 90, 126<br />

Kirschey, L., 11, 91, 95, 126<br />

Kilincer, A.N., 11, 84<br />

Kimsey, L.S., 9, 24<br />

Kittel, R., 126<br />

134


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Kjellberg, F., 8, 26<br />

Klopfstein, S., 4, 11, 24, 91, 126<br />

Koçak, E., 4, 11, 36, 84, 126<br />

Kodan, M., 7, 37, 126<br />

Kolesova, N.S., 11, 92, 126<br />

Konishi, K., 11, 92, 126<br />

Kos, K., 11, 93, 126<br />

Kozák, L., 13, 114<br />

Krause, S., 8, 11, 38, 95, 126<br />

Krogmann, L., 8, 9, 11, 38, 47, 94, 126<br />

Kropf, C., 11, 91<br />

Laurenne, N.M., 4, 24<br />

Lelej, A.S., 7, 23, 39, 126<br />

Lengyel, Sz., 13, 114<br />

Lewis, M., 4, 67<br />

Liljeblad, J., 5, 9, 34, 40, 126<br />

L<strong>of</strong>fredo, A.P., da Silva, 11, 95, 126<br />

Lohrmann, V., 8, 9, 11, 24, 41, 95, 126<br />

Lohse, K., 8, 41, 127<br />

Longino, J.T., 6, 66<br />

Lotfalizadeh, H., 4, 12, 42, 96, 127<br />

Macleod, E.S., 3, 53<br />

Magnusson, P., 127<br />

Mahmoud, S.M., 6, 30<br />

Majoros, G., 9, 27<br />

Marsan, C., 6, 29<br />

Masnady-Yazdinejad, A., 12, 96, 97, 98, 127<br />

Masner, L., 7, 10, 61, 65, 77<br />

Matsumoto, R., 7, 42, 60, 127<br />

Matsuo, K., 12, 98, 127<br />

Medianero, E., 5, 12, 46, 99<br />

Mehrabi, A., 13, 112<br />

Mehrnejad, M.R., 4, 43, 127<br />

Melika, G., 3, 5, 6, 13, 19, 20, 40, 45, 49, 59, 61, 112, 115, 116, 127<br />

Mete, Ö., 12, 99, 127<br />

Meyer, B., 9, 47<br />

Mikulás, J., 4, 20<br />

Mikó, I., 3, 7, 10, 28, 44, 45, 53, 69, 73, 127<br />

Miller, S., 4, 24, 56<br />

Mishchenko, A., 3, 68, 127<br />

Mishima, M., 12, 98<br />

Mis<strong>of</strong>, B., 9, 47<br />

Mitroiu, M.-D., 12, 100, 127<br />

Moharramipour, S., 13, 110<br />

Moniri, V.-R., 14, 119<br />

Mosel, S., 127<br />

Mottern, J.L., 12, 100, 127<br />

Mozafari, M., 13, 112<br />

Mozafarian, S., 13, 115, 116<br />

Muirhead, K.A., 4, 44<br />

Muller, F., 8, 69<br />

Mullins, P.L., 7, 45, 127<br />

Munro, J., 9, 34<br />

135


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Murray, E., 9, 12, 34, 101, 127<br />

Musetti, L., 7, 36, 127<br />

Nakamura, S., 12, 102, 128<br />

Neser, S., 5, 40<br />

Nevronyt, Ž., 10, 12, 74, 75, 101<br />

Nguyen, H.T., 12, 102<br />

Nicholls, J.A., 5, 6, 29, 45, 61, 128<br />

Niehuis, O., 9, 47<br />

Nieves-Aldrey, J.L., 5, 10, 11, 12, 40, 46, 59, 82, 83, 99, 128<br />

Norrbom, A., 4, 49<br />

Noyes, J.S., 12, 103, 128<br />

Ohl, M., 8, 9, 10, 11, 24, 38, 41,74, 91, 95, 128<br />

Oliveira Gonzaga, M., 11, 95<br />

Oltra-Moscardo, M.T., 10, 12, 77, 78, 106, 107<br />

Österblad, I., 12, 103, 128<br />

Ouakid, M., 5, 49<br />

Özdan, A., 6, 33<br />

Özgen, I., 6, 12, 47, 104, 128<br />

Packer, L., 9, 24<br />

Paretas-Martínez, J., 12, 104<br />

Penev, L., 4, 15, 128<br />

Penteado-Dias, A.M., 10, 11, 12, 76, 95, 105, 128<br />

Pénzes, Zs., 5, 6, 19, 49, 59, 128<br />

Peris-Felipo, F.J., 10, 12, 77, 78, 106, 107, 128<br />

Perrard, A., 8, 69<br />

Perrichot, V., 3, 66<br />

Peters, R.S., 9, 13, 47, 107, 128<br />

Petrovi, A., 11, 93<br />

Piazza, E., 5, 20<br />

Pickett, K.M., 9, 48, 128<br />

Popescu, I.E., 13, 108, 128<br />

Popovici, O.A., 7, 13, 65, 108, 128<br />

Potter, D., 5, 50<br />

Pricop, E., 13, 109, 128<br />

Pujade-Villar, J., 5, 12, 49, 59, 104, 116, 129<br />

Quacchia, A., 5, 20<br />

Quicke, D. L.J., 4, 11, 24, 56, 91, 129<br />

Radzeviit, R., 13, 117<br />

Rahemi, S., 13, 110<br />

Rakhshani, E., 13, 110<br />

Rasplus, J.-Y., 4, 8, 26, 42, 129<br />

Reséndiz-Flores, A., 6, 71<br />

Reshchikov, A., 13, 111, 129<br />

Restrepo-Ortiz, C., 12, 104<br />

Ribes Escolá, A., 6, 16<br />

Rizzo, M.C., 6, 16<br />

Robertson, H., 8, 65<br />

Rodriguez, C., 5, 49<br />

Rodriguez, J., 4, 24, 56<br />

Rodríguez-Pérez, A.C., 6, 71<br />

Roller, L., 4, 20<br />

Rome1, Q., 8, 69<br />

Ronquist, F., 9, 53<br />

136


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Sadeghi, S.E., 10, 11, 13, 14, 72, 85, 110, 112, 115, 116, 119, 129<br />

Salehi, M., 13, 112<br />

Sallam, N., 4, 44<br />

Santinelo Pereira, R.A., 8, 26<br />

Sarı, S., 13, 115<br />

Saure, C., 7, 15<br />

Sääksjärvi, I.E., 6, 66<br />

Schauff, M., 129<br />

Scheffer, S., 4, 49, 67<br />

Schick, K.N., 5, 50, 129<br />

Schmidl, J., 14, 121<br />

Schmidt, J.O., 8, 9, 51, 129<br />

Schmidt, S., 8, 51, 129<br />

Schönrogge, K., 5, 52, 55, 59, 129<br />

Schulmeister, S., 9, 24, 53<br />

Schulze, M., 11, 95<br />

Schütte, K., 9, 47<br />

Schwarzfeld, M.D., 6, 52, 129<br />

Schweizer, M., 3, 18<br />

Seifert, B., 11, 83<br />

Seltmann, K., 3, 10, 44, 53, 69, 73, 129<br />

Sharanowski, B., 4, 7, 8, 24, 28, 41, 45, 53, 129<br />

Sharkey, M.J., 4, 9, 24, 53, 56, 70, 129<br />

Shattuck, S.O., 13, 114<br />

Shaw, M.R., 4, 6, 24, 54, 129<br />

Shaw, S.R., 3, 4, 24, 66<br />

Shayesteh, N., 13, 112, 129<br />

Shevtsova, E., 3, 13, 54, 113, 130<br />

Shojai, M., 13, 110<br />

Shorthouse, J.D., 5, 34, 50<br />

Sinclair, F., 5, 55, 130<br />

Sipos, B., 6, 19<br />

Smith, D.R., 13, 117<br />

Smith, M.A., 4, 6, 24, 56, 71<br />

Sobczak, J.F., 11, 95<br />

Somogyi, K., 6, 19<br />

Soon, V., 8, 57, 130<br />

Sparks, K.S., 13, 114<br />

Sperling, F.A.H., 6, 52<br />

Stigenberg, J., 6, 58, 130<br />

Stojanova, A.M., 13, 115, 130<br />

Stone, G.N., 5, 6, 8, 13, 19, 29, 34, 41, 45, 49, 55, 59, 61, 112, 115, 116, 130<br />

Szabó, Gy., 13, 114, 130<br />

Taeger, A., 130<br />

Taekul, C., 7, 60, 65, 130<br />

Takano, S-I., 12, 102<br />

Takasuka, K., 6, 60, 130<br />

Talamas, E.J., 7, 13, 61, 115, 130<br />

Tang, C.-T., 5, 45, 61, 130<br />

Tavakoli, M., 13, 112, 115, 116, 130<br />

Tokuda, M., 12, 98<br />

Tomanovi, Ž., 11, 93<br />

Trdan, S., 11, 93<br />

Triapitsyn, S.V., 7, 8, 13, 63, 64, 130<br />

137


7 th <strong>International</strong> <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hymenopterists</strong><br />

20-26 June 2010, Kszeg Hungary<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Turinaviien, J., 13, 117<br />

Turrisi, G.F., 13, 117, 130<br />

Ubaidillah, R., 8, 26<br />

Valerio, A.A., 7, 60<br />

Van Noort, S., 7, 8, 26, 65, 130<br />

Vårdal, H., 13, 118, 131<br />

Veijalainen, A., 6, 66, 131<br />

Vétek, G., 4, 20<br />

Vilhelmsen, L., 3, 9, 44, 53, 66, 131<br />

Villemant, C., 8, 69<br />

Vogler, A.P., 4, 24<br />

Wachi, N., 13, 119, 131<br />

Wahlberg, N., 6, 66<br />

Walter, G.H., 8, 51<br />

Ward, D.F., 4, 10, 53, 56, 77, 131<br />

Wharton, R.A., 4, 6, 22, 49, 67, 131<br />

Wheeler, W.C., 9, 53<br />

Whitfield, J.B., 4, 6, 24, 28, 56<br />

Woolley, J.B., 3, 4, 6, 67, 131<br />

Xiao, H., 11, 89, 131<br />

Yang, M.-M., 5, 45, 61<br />

Yan-Qiong, P., 8, 26<br />

Yarmand, H., 13, 14, 112, 115, 116, 119, 131<br />

Yefremova, Z., 3, 68, 131<br />

Yegorenkova, E., 3, 68, 131<br />

Yoder, M.J., 3, 9, 10, 34, 44, 53, 69, 73, 131<br />

Yoshida, T., 8, 69, 131<br />

Yousuf, M., 14, 120, 131<br />

Yörük, B., 13, 115<br />

Yu, D., 4, 70<br />

Yukawa, J., 12, 98<br />

Zakar, E., 13, 114, 131<br />

Zaldivar-Riveron, A., 4, 6, 24, 56, 71, 131<br />

Zargaran, M.R., 13, 112, 115, 116<br />

Zeinali, S., 13, 110, 112<br />

Zimmermann, D., 14, 121, 131<br />

138

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!