02.12.2014 Views

THE GENUS SCHISTIDIUM (GRIMMIACEAE, MUSCI) IN HUNGARY ...

THE GENUS SCHISTIDIUM (GRIMMIACEAE, MUSCI) IN HUNGARY ...

THE GENUS SCHISTIDIUM (GRIMMIACEAE, MUSCI) IN HUNGARY ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Studia bot. hung. 39, pp. 27–88, 2008<br />

<strong>THE</strong> <strong>GENUS</strong> <strong>SCHISTIDIUM</strong> (<strong>GRIMMIACEAE</strong>, <strong>MUSCI</strong>)<br />

<strong>IN</strong> <strong>HUNGARY</strong><br />

P. ERZBERGER 1 and W. SCHRÖDER 2<br />

1 Belziger Str. 37, D-10823 Berlin, Germany; erzberger@erzfisch.de<br />

2 Ludwigsstädter Str. 51, D-96337 Ludwigsstadt, Germany<br />

All available specimens of Schistidium (collected in Hungary) in Hungarian herbaria (BP,<br />

EGR and private herbaria) and collections of the first author (B) were revised. The<br />

following 15 taxa were found to occur in Hungary: Schistidium apocarpum, S. brunnescens<br />

subsp. brunnescens, S. brunnescens subsp. griseum, S. confertum, S. confusum, S. crassipilum,<br />

S. dupretii, S. elegantulum, S. flaccidum, S. helveticum, S. lancifolium, S. papillosum, S.<br />

platyphyllum (new to South-Eastern Central Europe), S. pruinosum, and S. robustum. All<br />

except S. apocarpum, S. brunnescens subsp. brunnescens, S. crassipilum, S. flaccidum and S.<br />

helveticum are new to Hungary. Descriptions, illustrations, distribution maps and a key are<br />

provided. Some taxonomic, bryogeographical and conservation issues are briefly discussed.<br />

Key words: bryophytes, distribution maps, habitat requirements, illustrated key, Schistidium<br />

platyphyllum<br />

<strong>IN</strong>TRODUCTION<br />

Since the revision of the Schistidium apocarpum complex by BLOM<br />

(1996, 1998), his concepts – developed for the taxa found in Scandinavia –<br />

have been widely and rather successfully applied in other parts of Europe<br />

(BLOCKEEL and LONG 1998, GRIMS 1999, HOLZ 2000, CASAS et al. 2001,<br />

CORT<strong>IN</strong>I-PEDROTTI 2001, SOTIAUX and VANDERPOORTEN 2001, SIEBEL<br />

2003, MÜLLER 2004, SMITH 2004, CASAS et al. 2006, BLOM et al. 2006,<br />

IGNATOV et al. 2006, IGNATOVA et al. 2006, ME<strong>IN</strong>UNGER and SCHRÖDER<br />

2007). A recent molecular study seems to support the narrow species concept<br />

of Blom (GORYUNOV et al. 2007). As information on the distribution<br />

of taxa in a wider geographical area is accumulating, their ecological profile<br />

and additional knowledge about their variability is becoming more precise<br />

as well. At the same time, some new species have been described (BLOM<br />

1998, BLOM and LÜTH 2002).<br />

Studia Botanica Hungarica, 39, 2008<br />

Hungarian Natural History Museum, Budapest


28 ERZBERGER, P. and SCHRÖDER, W.<br />

After the preliminary treatment of Schistidium in the checklist of Hungarian<br />

bryophytes (ERZBERGER and PAPP 2004), the present work aims at<br />

closing this gap by the revision of a large number of specimens of this genus.<br />

Apart from answering the question of which taxa occur in Hungary, their<br />

distribution in the floristical regions of the country as defined by BOROS<br />

(1968) is assessed and mapped. For each taxon, selected morphological characters<br />

are described, based on observations in Hungarian material and the<br />

literature, and illustrated. The authors propose a determination key for<br />

Schistidium in Hungary. Habitat preference and distribution in Hungary<br />

are discussed and compared with the results from other countries.<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

All specimens collected in Hungary and labelled Schistidium (or synonyms) in the<br />

bryophyte herbarium of the Hungarian Natural History Museum (BP), the herbarium of<br />

the Eszterházy College in Eger (EGR), and of some private herbaria (P. Ódor, Budapest, P.<br />

Szûcs, Almásfüzitõ) as well as the recent collections of the first author were examined by<br />

light microscopy and revised, apart from incomplete or non-fruiting material. Drawings of<br />

some morphological features were achieved with a Leitz drawing apparatus. In order to<br />

observe the pattern of the exothecial cells and stomata in the basal part of the capsule,<br />

sporophytes were emptied and well soaked in 2% KOH, sometimes by boiling for some<br />

seconds with a cigarette lighter to remove air bubbles, and then cut in half using a razor<br />

blade. In order to completely flatten the capsule wall, an additional longitudinal cut of<br />

about half of the capsule length was applied to the basal part of each half.<br />

In randomly selected specimens measurements of urn length and width were taken<br />

from emptied capsules soaked in 2% KOH. From these data, the ratio length/width was<br />

computed, and means and standard errors were also evaluated for each taxon.<br />

Distribution maps were prepared on the basis of the Central European mapping<br />

scheme (NIKLFELD 1971). Open circles represent collections before 1977, closed circles<br />

after that year.<br />

Frequency of taxa is estimated by the number of different growth sites as noted on<br />

the specimen labels.<br />

Nomenclature of bryophytes follows ERZBERGER and PAPP (2004) with the exception<br />

of Schistidium, Bryum moravicum Podb. (= B. laevifilum Syed) and B. kunzei Hornsch.,<br />

where HILL et al. (2006) is followed.<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


<strong>THE</strong> <strong>GENUS</strong> <strong>SCHISTIDIUM</strong> <strong>IN</strong> <strong>HUNGARY</strong> 29<br />

Taxonomic characters<br />

– Visible in stem cross sections of sporophyte bearing plants. In<br />

sterile shoots, the central strand may not fully be developed.<br />

– Two types of hair-point can be distinguished (BLOM 1996):<br />

(1) (Figs 3C, 9C, E, 11B 15C, 23C, 25B): cell walls clearly visible; transverse section<br />

canaliculate, flattened or lens-shaped; hair-point irregularly bent or flexuose in the dry<br />

state (but straight in S. dupretii and S. confusum). (2) (Figs 5E, 7B, E, 13C, 17E, 21C,<br />

30B, C, 32B, D): cell walls usually not clearly visible; transverse section lens-shaped or<br />

terete; hair-point usually straight.<br />

– Sinuose (e.g. in S. robustum, Fig. 32E) or esinuose, size in different<br />

parts of leaf (basal, central and apical) is also important.<br />

– Hemispherical or conical cell wall structures on leaf lamina (Figs 11E,<br />

25F, 30G, H), costa and margins (Figs 3B, 13B–D, 15C, 23B, C, E, 28B, 30B, C). Since in<br />

papillose species only a fraction of lamina cells bear papillae, papillosity is a property of the<br />

lamina, not of cells. Young leaves should be examined for papillosity.<br />

K+ – Upper leaves torn off the stem and placed in a drop of 2% KOH solution develop<br />

either yellow (in Confertum group) or red (in all other taxa) colours.<br />

– These important characters<br />

are best assessed in empty capsules soaked in 2% KOH solution, because after this procedure<br />

even old, fragile or damaged capsules assume their original shape, the capsule wall<br />

becomes less fragile and can thus be cut more easily, and the pattern of exothecial cells and<br />

stomata will also become much clearer. If only green, unripe capsules are available, these<br />

should be boiled for a short time in 2% KOH solution and then cut and emptied for examination<br />

of exothecial cells and stomata; however their shape and size will not correspond to<br />

that of ripe, emptied urns.<br />

Urn form may be the widest at the mouth (e.g. S. platyphyllum, Fig. 27D) or about the<br />

middle (e.g. S. elegantulum, Fig. 17F); measurements of length and width are important in<br />

absolute terms (e.g. for the differentiation between S. apocapum and S. lancifolium, compare<br />

Figs 3E and 23F) as well as their ratio. Measurements should be taken under a stereomicroscope<br />

without flattening the urn.<br />

The pattern of exothecial cells must be carefully observed in different parts of the<br />

capsule (see Fig. 1C–E), most relevant is the pattern in the lower half, especially at the base<br />

immediately above the seta, where the stomata may be observed. The pattern of seta surface<br />

cells is also sometimes useful (e.g. in the Rivulare group, Fig. 27G, 28F; BREMER 1980).<br />

In some taxa, ripe emptied urns may show a very fine striolation due to the arrangement<br />

of exothecial cells in vertical rows (Fig. 1). Transverse sections of the capsule wall<br />

(Fig. 1A) show an exothecium of even thickness, as in the capsule walls of Grimmia species<br />

(MAIER 2004). Sometimes (e.g. in S. dupretii) striolae develop due to the fact that long narrow<br />

exothecial cells, alternating with shorter cells, collapse (Fig. 15I, J). These striolae are<br />

not comparable to the plicae in the urns of other genera, e.g. Orthotrichum (MAIER 2004).<br />

– Orientation of peristome teeth should be observed in freshly<br />

deoperculate capsules. Peristome teeth may be patent to spreading with ascending tips<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


30 ERZBERGER, P. and SCHRÖDER, W.<br />

(e.g. S. apocarpum, Fig. 3E) to squarrose-recurved (e.g. S. confusum, Fig. 11G). Apart from<br />

colour and papillosity, the size and shape of peristome teeth is important, as is the amount<br />

of perforation by pits and holes in cribrose peristome teeth.<br />

B<br />

C<br />

D<br />

F<br />

A<br />

E<br />

G<br />

Capsule walls without ( ) and with striolae ( ). = transverse section of capsule<br />

wall (exothecium stippled); = exothecial cells in Schistidium apocarpum; = exothecial<br />

cells in S. crassipilum at top of urn / in mid urn / at base of urn; , = exothecial cells in S.<br />

lancifolium in upper/lower part of urn. Scale bar: 200 μm. [Del. Schröder]<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

According to the revision of all available herbarium material presented<br />

here, in Hungary the genus Schistidium comprises fifteen taxa, which can<br />

be grouped in the following informal infrageneric categories (BLOM 1998):<br />

Rivulare group: S. platyphyllum (Mitt.) H. Perss. subsp. platyphyllum;<br />

Apocarpum group, Apocarpum subgroup: S. apocarpum (Hedw.)<br />

Bruch et Schimp., S. lancifolium (Kindb.) H. H. Blom;<br />

Apocarpum group, Strictum subgroup: S. confusum H. H. Blom, S.<br />

papillosum Culm., S. pruinosum (Wilson ex Schimp.) G. Roth;<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


<strong>THE</strong> <strong>GENUS</strong> <strong>SCHISTIDIUM</strong> <strong>IN</strong> <strong>HUNGARY</strong> 31<br />

Robustum group: S. dupretii (Thér.) W. A. Weber, S. robustum (Nees<br />

et Hornsch.) H. H. Blom;<br />

Confertum group: S. confertum (Funck) Bruch et Schimp., S. flaccidum<br />

(De Not.) Ochyra;<br />

Atrofuscum group: S. brunnescens Limpr. subsp. brunnescens, S. brunnescens<br />

subsp. griseum (Nees et Hornsch.) H. H. Blom, S. crassipilum H. H.<br />

Blom, S. elegantulum H. H. Blom, S. helveticum (Schkuhr) Deguchi (= S. singarense<br />

(Schiffn.) Laz.).<br />

Historical aspects<br />

The oldest specimens of Schistidium in the bryophyte collections of<br />

the Hungarian Natural History Museum (BP) date from the second half of<br />

the 19th century. Two are without date (S. apocarpum s. str.: “Magyarhon<br />

virányából Hazslinszky Frigyes, Grimmia apocarpa L. Ágasvár Mátra l.<br />

Borbás” BP 5758; S. crassipilum:“Grimmia apocarpa Kalkfelsen b. Tapolcza;<br />

ex herbario Frid. Hazslinskyi” BP 5699). The oldest specimens with a date<br />

are S. crassipilum from 1870 (BP 5667 Herbar. Musei Nat. Hungar. Budapest<br />

Specimen in herb. Simonkai L. inter Grimmia apocarpa insertum erat<br />

“In rupestribus montis ‘Kis Eged’ prope Agriam. Comitat. Heves in Hungaria.<br />

6. Apr. 1870 Vrabélyi”), and S. elegantulum from 1886 (BP 5624 “Ex<br />

herbario C. Schilberszky, Farkasvölgy, mészkõ [18]86.V.2”). Among the<br />

older collections there are some by Á. Degen from 1901 and L. Simonkai<br />

from 1904. Table 1 lists the collectors, the period of collection (of Schistidium<br />

specimens), and the number of specimens (corrected for duplicates).<br />

In his bryophyte flora of the surroundings of Budapest and the Pilis Mts<br />

SZEPESFALVI (1941) treats Schistidium under Grimmia and mentions 2 species:<br />

S. flaccidum (as G. flaccida) and S. apocarpum s. l. (as G. apocarpa) with<br />

three varieties: var. brunnescens,var.conferta, and var. gracilis. While his specimens<br />

of S. flaccidum and var. brunnescens could be confirmed in the present<br />

revision, the plants labelled var. conferta proved to be S. apocarpum s. str., S.<br />

brunnescens subsp. brunnescens, orS. cf. crassipilum, but not S. confertum.<br />

We did not see any specimens collected by Szepesfalvi labelled var. gracilis.<br />

In an earlier paper SZEPESFALVI (1935) stated that S. brunnescens was<br />

rare in the surroundings of Budapest and in Hungary, thus contradicting<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


32 ERZBERGER, P. and SCHRÖDER, W.<br />

PÉTERFI (1916), who held the opposite opinion. It is interesting that Péterfi<br />

considered the possibility that plants named S. confertum growing on limestone<br />

rocks might prove to be S. brunnescens – and that in our revision this<br />

turned out to be true.<br />

BOROS’s (1968) taxonomic treatment is similar to that of SZEPESFALVI<br />

(1941), he lists some more forms (f. irrigata,f.epilosa,f.laxum = f. gracile),<br />

varieties (var. nigrescens) and subspecies (subsp. conferta,subsp.brunnescens)<br />

of S. apocarpum s. l. His f. irrigata was revised to S. apocarpum s. str.; under f.<br />

epilosa many different taxa were found, some belonging to different genera<br />

(S. apocarpum s. str., S. brunnescens subsp. brunnescens, S. crassipilum, S. helveticum,<br />

S. lancifolium, Didymodon acutus, D. insulanus, D. luridus, D. rigidulus);<br />

similarly “f. gracile” was found on specimen labels of S. crassipilum,<br />

S. apocarpum and S. lancifolium. Some specimens of S. crassipilum and S. apocarpum<br />

were labelled “var. nigrescens” by Boros. Specimens labelled “ssp.<br />

conferta” by Boros proved to be S. crassipilum or S. brunnescens subsp. brunnescens.<br />

However, plants that he named subsp. brunnescens consistently<br />

could be referred to S. brunnescens subsp. brunnescens.<br />

ORBÁN and VAJDA (1983) treat all taxa of Schistidium as subspecies,<br />

varieties or forms of S. apocarpum, even S. flaccidum, in this respect adopting<br />

the concept of LOESKE (1930). As for specimens collected by Vajda and<br />

bearing various subspecific labels, roughly the same applies as for Boros’s<br />

collections: his f. irrigata and S. rivulare proved to be S. apocarpum, subsp.<br />

gracile was revised to S. crassipilum and S. apocarpum, but one specimen (BP<br />

67976) labelled Grimmia apocarpa var. conferta could be confirmed as S.<br />

confertum, and S. brunnescens was also consistently confirmed.<br />

In Figure 2 the number of specimens of Schistidium collected in the<br />

years between 1870 and 2007 (including the collections of the first author)<br />

is depicted, clearly showing two periods of collecting activity with respect<br />

to Schistidium in Hungary: the first between 1905 and 1965, with major contributions<br />

by Boros, Degen, Szepesfalvi, Szurák and Vajda (compare Table 1),<br />

and the second between 1985 and 2007, with major contributions of Rajczy,<br />

Papp and the first author. In the distribution maps, collections from these<br />

two periods are represented by different symbols (open circles for the older<br />

collections, closed circles for the recent ones).<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


<strong>THE</strong> <strong>GENUS</strong> <strong>SCHISTIDIUM</strong> <strong>IN</strong> <strong>HUNGARY</strong> 33<br />

Bryological activity in Hungary – number of specimens of Schistidium (without<br />

duplicates) collected between 1870 and 2007<br />

Collectors of Schistidium from Hungary in BP, EGR, and B<br />

Collector Period or year of collection No. of specimens<br />

Balanyi, L. 1959 1<br />

Bán, E. 1934 1<br />

Borbás, V s.t. 1<br />

Boros, Á. 1917–1968 259<br />

Degen, Á. 1901–1924 15<br />

Erzberger, P. 1991–2008 179<br />

Felföldy, L. 1952–1956 6<br />

Gelencsér, I. 1954 1<br />

Glatz, W. 1936 1<br />

Gyõrffy, I. 1921–1928 2<br />

Héder, I. 1953 1<br />

Igmándy, J. 1924–1941 4<br />

Károlyi, Á. 1947–1956 10<br />

Kenyeres, J. [= “uxor mea”, Boros’s wife] 1956 1<br />

Kis, G. 1984 1<br />

Kovács, M. 1957 1<br />

Lengyel, G. 1909–1921 2<br />

Ódor, P. 1996–2001 4<br />

Ötvös, L. 1933 1<br />

Papp, B. 1989–2008 39<br />

Pénzes, A. 1947 1<br />

Péter, B. 1936 1<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


34 ERZBERGER, P. and SCHRÖDER, W.<br />

(continued)<br />

Collector Period or year of collection No. of specimens<br />

Pócs, T. 1950–2007 7<br />

Polgár, S. 1932–1935 3<br />

Prágai, Z. 1958 1<br />

Priszter, Sz. 1953 1<br />

Rajczy, M. 1976–1994 21<br />

Redinger, K. 1931 3<br />

Sándor s.t. 1<br />

Sass-Gyarmati, A. 2001 1<br />

Simonkai, L. 1904 2<br />

Schilberszky, K. 1885 1<br />

Szemes, G. 1947 1<br />

Szepesfalvi (Szurák), J. 1911–1937 61<br />

Szûcs, P. 2004–2006 14<br />

Timár, L. 1914–1952 12<br />

Timkó, Gy. 1924 1<br />

Vajda, L. 1942–1971 93<br />

Vidéki, R. 2006 1<br />

Visnya, A. 1931–1953 9<br />

Vrabélyi, M. 1870 1<br />

Wagner, J. 1927 1<br />

Descriptions, selected diagnostic features<br />

The descriptions are based on BLOM (1996, 1998), HOLZ (2000),<br />

WEIBULL (2006), and our own observations. The data on the urn length/<br />

width ratio of Hungarian material include (minimum) mean ± 2s.e. (maximum),<br />

sample size. Vertical distribution: elevation of lowest and highest location<br />

according to specimen labels. For convenience, in this paragraph,<br />

the taxa will be treated in alphabetical order.<br />

(Hedw.) Bruch et Schimp.<br />

(Figs 3, 4)<br />

Plants medium-sized to large, forming lax or dense tufts or mats. Central strand absent<br />

or narrow and indistinct. Hair-point 0–0.8 mm, fine, thin and ± flexuose, from not to<br />

longly decurrent. Abaxial side of costa and leaf margin papillose, distantly denticulate in<br />

upper part of leaf, rarely smooth (longipilose plants).<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


<strong>THE</strong> <strong>GENUS</strong> <strong>SCHISTIDIUM</strong> <strong>IN</strong> <strong>HUNGARY</strong> 35<br />

A B C<br />

E<br />

D<br />

F<br />

H<br />

G<br />

Schistidium apocarpum. =leaves; , =leafapices; = perichaetial leaf; =capsule;<br />

, =exothecialcellsinmidurn/atbaseofurnandsetasurfacecells;H =peristome<br />

tooth. Scale bar: A, D, E – 2 mm; B – 800 μm; C, H – 400 μm; F, G – 200 μm. [Erzberger<br />

12084, del. Erzberger]<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


36 ERZBERGER, P. and SCHRÖDER, W.<br />

Lamina without papillae, smooth, predominantly unistratose, but often with bistratose<br />

patches or striae in upper half. Lamina cells from slightly to strongly sinuose, in upper part<br />

8–10 μm wide. K+ red.<br />

Sporophytes common, deeply immersed. Urn dark red, widest at mouth, length/width<br />

ratio (1.2–)1.3–1.6(–2.0) (BLOM 1996), in Hungarian material (1.0–)1.51 ±0.06(–2.0),<br />

n = 65. Exothecial cells predominantly isodiametric and short transversely rectangular, but<br />

often with patches of elongate and rectangular cells. Stomata (4–)8–12(–18) per urn. Peristome<br />

teeth (350–)400–710 μm, red, patent to spreading with ascending tips, longly tapering<br />

to a fine point, in lower part ± semi-perforated, in central and upper parts from almost<br />

entire to strongly perforated with small oval cracks in submarginal rows.<br />

Normally easily identified by the combination of denticulate leaf tips and isodiametric<br />

exothecial cells, but longipilose forms occur with smooth leaf margin and costa.<br />

: On often shaded or moist, but sometimes also exposed or dry siliceous (andesite,<br />

porphyric rock, aleurolitic slate, sandstone, basalt) or more rarely calcareous rocks,<br />

often near streams or springs, but also on walls, even on loess.<br />

: Amphidium mougeotii, Brachythecium populeum, Ceratodon<br />

purpureus, Didymodon rigidulus, D. sinuosus, D. vinealis, Grimmia hartmanii, Hedwigia<br />

ciliata var. ciliata, Hypnum cupressiforme, Lejeunea cavifolia, Orthotrichum urnigerum,<br />

Orthotrichum sp., Schistidium crassipilum, S. dupretii, S. elegantulum, S. lancifolium, S. pruinosum,<br />

Taxiphyllum densifolium, Tortella tortuosa, Tortula ruralis.<br />

: 83–900 m a.s.l.<br />

: : Comit. Abaúj-Torna. In rupibus<br />

irrigatis rivi Ósva-patak (pars superior) prope pag. Telkibánya, montes Sátor-hegység,<br />

17.09.1959, leg. L. Vajda, BP 63350;<br />

Distribution of Schistidium apocarpum<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


<strong>THE</strong> <strong>GENUS</strong> <strong>SCHISTIDIUM</strong> <strong>IN</strong> <strong>HUNGARY</strong> 37<br />

: Comit. Abaúj-Torna. In rupibus calcareis umbrosis silvat. ad<br />

fontem vallis Kopolya prope Szinpetri, 200 m, 19.06.1953, leg. Á. Boros, BP 110955;<br />

: Comit. Abaúj-Torna et Borsod. In rupibus calcar. alvei rivi vallis<br />

Telekes-völgy prope Perkupa, 180 m, 24.06.1953, leg. Á. Boros, BP 110966; :<br />

Felsõtárkány, Lök-völgy, aleurolite slate rocks at road, N 48° 00’ 25.2”, E 20° 27’<br />

57.8”, 337 m, 06.04.2007, leg. P. Erzberger and T. Pócs, herb. Erzberger, (B) 12108;<br />

: Sorkõ/Sombokor, 800–860 m, 02.06.2001, leg. B. Papp, BP 170576;<br />

: Radiolarit-Felsen an der Straße ca 1 km S Bátor, 230 m, 26.03.2008, leg. P.<br />

Erzberger and T. Pócs, herb. Erzberger, (B) 12842a; : Cserhátszentiván,<br />

Cserkuti patak, 05.08.2002, leg. P. Erzberger, herb. Erzberger, (B) 7312;<br />

: Comit. Pest. In saxis andesit. vallis “Bükkös” ad “Sikáros” in<br />

Fageto, 350 m, 05.07.1933, leg. J. Szepesfalvi, BP 5859; : Comit.<br />

Hont. In rupibus andes. silvat. alvei rivi Kemence-patak infra Barsi-bükk pr. Kemence,<br />

300 m, 12.10.1958, leg. Á. Boros, BP 110874; Kemence-patak, on andesite boulder near the<br />

water, N 47° 59’ 07.8”, E 18° 58’ 20.7”, 384 m, 05.04.2007, leg. P. Erzberger, herb. Erzberger,<br />

(B) 12084; : Comit. Pest. In petrosis andesiticis in ripa rivi vallis<br />

“Apátkuti völgy” prope Visegrád, 200–300 m, 24.04.1924, leg. Á. Boros, BP 110905;<br />

: Szendehely-Katalinpuszta, Lósi-patak, sandstone near stream, N 47° 51’<br />

01.1”, E 19° 06’ 24.4”, 180 m, 09.04.2007, leg. P. Erzberger and P. Szûcs, herb. Erzberger, (B)<br />

12163; : Budapest: János-hegy, mészkövön, 21.04.1924, leg. J. Szurák,<br />

BP 5628; : Comit. Esztergom. In cava rupe in decliv. sept. silvat.<br />

montis Nagyteke-hegy prope pag. Süttõ, 300 m, 17.05.1941, leg. Á. Boros, BP 110850;<br />

: County Veszprém. On rock in forest on the southern slope of<br />

Szent György-hegy at Hegymagas, 300 m, 13.08.1999, leg. B. Papp, BP 166930;<br />

: Tátika, 30.07.2000, leg. P. Erzberger, herb. Erzberger, (B) 6258; :<br />

: Querceto-Luzuletum sub font. Szénégetõ-forrás, supra pag. Velem, 13.07.1954,<br />

leg. T. Pócs et I. Gelencsér, BP 58482; : Comit. Baranya. In rupibus<br />

irrigatis vallis Csatornavölgy prope pag. Vasas, 26.07.1952, leg. L. Vajda, BP 5619;<br />

: Comit. Baranya. In rupibus calcareis umbrosis in sylva Tenkes-erdõ in<br />

monte Tenkes prope pag. Bisse, 300 m, 07.08.1999, leg. B. Papp, BP 166507;<br />

: Comit. Csongrád. Sándorfalva. Tegmen lapidarium (andesiticum)<br />

aggeri ad Sajtos, 83 m, 09.08.1957, leg. L. Timár, EGR; : In cippo in sepultura<br />

Felsõ-temetõ prope Hajdunánás, com.: Hajdu, 02.04.1941, leg. J. Igmándy, BP<br />

111365; : Comit. Ung. In muris pontis viae ferreae ad Záhony,<br />

100 m, 07.09.1925, leg. Á. Boros, BP 111357.<br />

Limpr. subsp.<br />

(Figs 5, 6)<br />

Plants small, forming dense tufts, brownish. Central strand mostly broad and distinct.<br />

Hair-point absent or short in leaves below perigonia, in subperichaetial and<br />

perichaetial leaves 0.15–1.0 mm, coarse and terete, but flattened towards insertion, not or<br />

shortly decurrent, but embracing parts of the upper lamina.<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


38 ERZBERGER, P. and SCHRÖDER, W.<br />

A B E<br />

F C D<br />

I<br />

H<br />

G<br />

Schistidium brunnescens subsp. brunnescens. = leaves; = subperichaetial leaves;<br />

, = perichaetial leaves; = perichaetial leaf apex; = capsules; , = exothecial cells<br />

in lower third / at base of urn; I = part of peristome. Scale bar: A–D, F – 2 mm; E – 800 μm;<br />

I – 400 μm; G, H – 200 μm. [A–C, E–F, I: Erzberger 12198; D: EGR Vajda 1946 (Pomáz);<br />

H: BP 37650, A–F, H: del. Erzberger, G: del. Schröder]<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


<strong>THE</strong> <strong>GENUS</strong> <strong>SCHISTIDIUM</strong> <strong>IN</strong> <strong>HUNGARY</strong> 39<br />

Costa and leaf margins smooth. Lamina smooth, in lower part unistratose, in upper part<br />

with bistratose spots. Upper lamina cells rounded, 6–9 μm wide, lower cells wider and<br />

slightly sinuose, basal marginal cells sometimes subhyaline, with slightly thickened<br />

cross-walls. K+ red.<br />

Sporophytes frequent, mostly shallowly immersed. Urn orange to reddish-brown, often<br />

finely striolate, widest below middle, length/width ratio (1.3–)1.4–1.6–1.8 (BLOM<br />

1996), in Hungarian material (0.94–)1.34 ±0.04(–1.93), n = 91. Exothecial cells elongate,<br />

especially in basal part, at least some up to 50 μm (often up to 80 μm) long, arranged in a<br />

regular pattern. Stomata absent. Peristome teeth 220–340 μm, orange, in central and<br />

upper parts mostly strongly perforated to cribrose.<br />

Variability: The exothecial cells in the lower part of the urn sometimes only reach<br />

(50–)55 μm, but in other samples they attain 75–80 μm.<br />

The brown, dense cushions with hair-points only around the sporophytes give this<br />

plant a very characteristic appearance. However, some forms of S. crassipilum can look<br />

quite similar, and in that case the strongly elongate exothecial cells (Fig. 5G, H, compare<br />

with Fig. 13I, J), and the shorter and wider urn of S. brunnescens are diagnostic. Confusion<br />

could also occur with forms of S. helveticum lacking the typical black colour, but again the<br />

pattern of exothecial cells is quite different. For the difference between subsp. brunnescens<br />

and subsp. griseum see the note under the latter.<br />

: S. brunnescens subsp. brunnescens grows nearly exclusively on exposed calcareous<br />

rocks (limestone, dolomite), and is a very typical member of the bryophyte vegetation in<br />

calcareous grasslands. It was found associated with the lichen Fulgensia fulgens (det. V. Otte).<br />

: Bryum argenteum, Didymodon rigidulus, D. vinealis, Grimmia<br />

dissimulata, G. orbicularis, G. pulvinata, Grimmia tergestina, Pseudocrossidium revolutum,<br />

Pseudoleskeella catenulata, Schistidium crassipilum, S. helveticum, Tortella inclinata, Tortula<br />

crinita, Trichostomum sp.<br />

: 150–780 m a.s.l.<br />

: : Comit. Gömör. In rupibus<br />

calc. montis “Baradla-tetõ” prope pag. Aggtelek, 350 m, 03.06.1928, leg. Á. Boros, BP<br />

111757; : Comit. Borsod. In rupibus calcar. montis Bélkõ prope Bélapátfalva,<br />

500–780 m, 03.09.1959, leg. Á. Boros, BP 110944; Lehmschieferfelsen an der<br />

Straßenböschung zwischen Bükkzsérc und Felsõtárkány, ca 400 m, mit S. crassipilum, 27.03.<br />

2008, leg. P. Erzberger and T. Pócs, herb. Erzberger, (B) 12886; :<br />

Glaukonit-Sandsteinfelsen “Noé szõllõje” im Ort Istenmezeje, 230 m, 26.03.2008, leg. P.<br />

Erzberger and T. Pócs, herb. Erzberger, (B) 12861; : Comit. Pest. In<br />

rupibus dolomit. apricis montis Vár-hegy prope Csõvár, 350 m, 06.05.1953, leg. Á. Boros,<br />

BP 111748; : Comit. Pest. In monte Somlyó prope Fóth, 21.05.1901,<br />

leg. Á. Degen, BP 37650; : Comit. Pest. In rupibus dolomiticis merid.<br />

montis Nagykevély prope pag. Pilisborosjenõ, 500 m, 25.03.1947, leg. Á. Boros, BP 111750;<br />

Hung. centr., com. Pest. In rupibus calcareis supra pag. Pomáz, 31.03.1946, leg. L. Vajda,<br />

EGR; : Budakalász, comit. Pest, in monte “Monalovác” ad saxa calcarea,<br />

250 m, III.1911, leg. J. Szurák, revid. M. Péterfi, BP 5645; : Gyermely,<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


40 ERZBERGER, P. and SCHRÖDER, W.<br />

Kecske-kõ, N 47° 35’ 52.9”, E 18° 36’ 57.9”, 250 m, 11.04.2007, leg. P. Erzberger, herb.<br />

Erzberger, (B) 12198; : Comit. Fejér. In rupibus dolomit. montis adv.<br />

“Pap irtás” prope Csákberény, 350–400 m, 26.04.1936, leg. Á. Boros, BP 111730;<br />

Comit. Fejér. In rupibus dolomiticis apricis montis Szóló-kõ prope Csákvár, 200–240 m,<br />

21.03.1937, leg. Á. Boros, BP 111726, EGR;<br />

Distribution of Schistidium brunnescens subsp. brunnescens<br />

: Comit. Veszprém. In dolomiticis montis Móroc-tetõ prope Várpalota,<br />

500 m, 08.04.1951, leg. Á. Boros, BP 111693; : Comit.<br />

Zala. In rupibus basalt. tophac. merid. montis Csucs-hegy prope Tihany, 200 m,<br />

14.11.1962, leg. Á. Boros, BP 111010; : Comit. Baranya. In calcareis<br />

montis Harsányi-hegy ad Nagyharsány, 200–400 m, 22.03.1925, leg. Á. Boros, BP 111385.<br />

subsp. (Nees et Hornsch.) H. H. Blom<br />

(Figs 7, 8)<br />

Differs from subsp. brunnescens in the following characters. Plants larger, mediumsized.<br />

Central strand of few cells or absent. Hair-point not distinctly longer in subperichaetial<br />

leaves, more finely spinulose, 0.25–0.9 mm. Leaves of different shape (Figs 5A<br />

and 7A), often with ridge-like plicae (Fig. 7F, G), costa stronger (58–90 μm wide versus<br />

45–60 μm wide in central part of subsp. brunnescens), 3–4 stratose in upper and 5–6 stratose<br />

in lower part (Fig. 7F, G).<br />

Sporophytes sparse. Urn length/width ratio 1.4–1.6–1.9 (BLOM 1996), in Hungarian<br />

material (1.3–)1.48 ±0.08(–1.6), n = 7. Peristome teeth 190–320(–370) μm, orange, less<br />

perforated than in subsp. brunnescens (Figs 5I, 7I).<br />

: Exposed dry calcareous rocks.<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


<strong>THE</strong> <strong>GENUS</strong> <strong>SCHISTIDIUM</strong> <strong>IN</strong> <strong>HUNGARY</strong> 41<br />

A B C<br />

F<br />

E<br />

G<br />

D<br />

H<br />

I<br />

Schistidium brunnescens subsp. griseum. = leaves; = leaf apex; = subperichaetial<br />

leaf; = perichaetial leaves; = perichaetial leaf apex; , = transverse sections<br />

in upper/lower part of leaf (showing bistratose ridges near margin: ); =capsule; = peristome<br />

tooth. Scale bar: A, C, D, H – 2 mm; B, E – 800 μm; I – 400 μm; F, G 200 μm.<br />

[Erzberger 12147, A–E, H, I: del. Erzberger; F, G: del. Schröder]<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


42 ERZBERGER, P. and SCHRÖDER, W.<br />

: Grimmia orbicularis, G. tergestina, Orthotrichum sp.<br />

: 300–826 m a.s.l.<br />

Distribution of Schistidium brunnescens subsp. griseum<br />

Selected specimens examined: : Répáshuta, Három-kõ, auf exponiertem<br />

Kalkstein, N 48° 03’ 41.0”, E 20° 28’ 54.1”, 826 m, 08.04.2007, leg. P. Erzberger, herb.<br />

Erzberger, (B) 12147; : Gipfel des Pilis-Berges, offener Felsrasen, auf<br />

exponiertem Kalkstein, N 47° 41’ 16.5”, E 18° 51’ 56.6”, 750 m, 12.04.2007, leg. P. Erzberger,<br />

herb. Erzberger, (B) 12204; : Com. Fejér. In rupibus calcareis siccis<br />

montis Csókahegy prope pag. Mór, montes Vértes, 01.07.1951, leg. L. Vajda, EGR, BP 5668.<br />

(Funck) Bruch et Schimp.<br />

(Figs. 9, 10)<br />

Plants small, glossy, usually forming dense cushions. Central strand narrow or sometimes<br />

absent in sterile shoots. Hair-point short (0–0.45 mm), weak and flattened, straight or<br />

irregularly bent, not decurrent, sharply and strongly spinulose-denticulate with erecto-patent<br />

to squarrose spinulae. Costa and leaf margins smooth. Lamina smooth, partly bistratose in<br />

upper and central parts. Upper lamina cells rounded, 5–8(–9) μm wide, lower cells wider<br />

and slightly sinuose, basal marginal cells often subhyaline, forming a rectangular alar group<br />

composed of several rows of square to shortly rectangular cells with thickened cross walls.<br />

K+yellow.<br />

Sporophytes common, shallowly or deeply immersed. Urn orange-yellow, length/<br />

width ratio 0.9–1.4–1.7 (BLOM 1996), in Hungarian material 1.29, n = 1. Exothecial cells<br />

predominantly elongate. Stomata 3–8 per urn. Peristome teeth 230–320 μm, orange,<br />

strongly perforated with long and ± wide cracks along the median line, sometimes with<br />

prongs split off at margins, coarsely papillose with rather distant, short papillae with broad<br />

basal part (appearing pebble-like).<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


<strong>THE</strong> <strong>GENUS</strong> <strong>SCHISTIDIUM</strong> <strong>IN</strong> <strong>HUNGARY</strong> 43<br />

A<br />

D E F G<br />

D<br />

B<br />

C<br />

H<br />

K<br />

I<br />

J<br />

M<br />

L<br />

Schistidium confertum. , = leaves; , , = leaf apices; F = perichaetial leaves;<br />

, = perichaetial leaf apices; , = capsules; , = exothecial cells in lower third / at<br />

base of urn; = peristome tooth (showing papillae, in part). Scale bar: A, D, F, I, J – 2 mm;<br />

B, G – 800 μm; E, H, K – 400 μm; C, L, M – 200 μm. [A–C, K, L: EGR Vajda 1956<br />

(Börzsöny, Hollókõ); D–I: BP 67976 Vajda 1962 (Börzsöny, Hollókõ); J, M: BP 111013<br />

Vajda 1952 (Mátra, Disznókõ), del. Erzberger]<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


44 ERZBERGER, P. and SCHRÖDER, W.<br />

The spinulose, flattened hair-point with visible lumina is quite unique to this species,<br />

it is not likely to be confused with any other Schistidium species in Hungary. The rather<br />

short urn with strongly perforated peristome, and the preference of siliceous substrata are<br />

further characteristics.<br />

: In Hungary, S. confertum grows exclusively on dry, andesitic rock. In Scandinavia,<br />

it grows on dry, ± exposed siliceous or base-rich rocks (BLOM 1996, 1998). It prefers<br />

acid rocks in Catalonia (CASAS et al. 2001).<br />

: 600–750 m a.s.l.<br />

Distribution of Schistidium confertum<br />

Selected specimens examined: Mátra Mts 8186/1 Com. Heves. In rupibus andesiticis<br />

siccis montis Disznókõ prope pag. Parádfürdõ, 750 m, 24.04.1952, leg. L. Vajda, BP<br />

5608 and 111013 (sub Grimmia plagiopodia); : Comit. Nógrád. In<br />

rupibus andesiticis siccis montis Hollókõ, prope pag. Perõcsény, montes Börzsöny, leg. L.<br />

Vajda, 30.05.1962, BP 67976 (sub Grimmia apocarpa var. conferta); Comit. Nógrád. In<br />

rupibus andesiticis siccis cacuminis montis Hollókõ prope pag. Kemence, montes Börzsöny,<br />

21.04.1956, leg. L. Vajda, EGR.<br />

H. H. Blom<br />

(Figs. 11, 12)<br />

Plants medium-sized, forming rather loose tufts of variable colour (olivaceous, brownish<br />

or blackish). Central strand wide and distinct. Hair-point 0–0.65 mm, narrow throughout<br />

or sometimes ± abruptly widened at insertion, not coarse but stiff and ± straight,<br />

from not to longly decurrent, irregularly spinulose-denticulate with short, blunt spinulae.<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


<strong>THE</strong> <strong>GENUS</strong> <strong>SCHISTIDIUM</strong> <strong>IN</strong> <strong>HUNGARY</strong> 45<br />

A B C G<br />

D<br />

E<br />

F<br />

J<br />

J<br />

I<br />

Schistidium confusum. = leaves; = leaf apex; C = perichaetial leaf; =lamina<br />

cells in lower third of leaf; E = papillae and lamina cells at abaxial side of leaf near<br />

costa; = capsule (moist); perichaetium with capsule (dry) showing reflexed peristome<br />

teeth; = exothecial cells at lower third / at base of urn; = part of peristome.<br />

Scale bar: A, C, F, G – 2 mm; B, H, J – 400 μm; D, E, I – 200 μm. [Erzberger 12896, del.<br />

Erzberger]<br />

H<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


46 ERZBERGER, P. and SCHRÖDER, W.<br />

Abaxial side of costa with scattered low papillae in upper part; leaf margins papillosedenticulate<br />

in upper part, more rarely smooth, broadly and strongly recurved throughout<br />

or in upper 3/4–4/5 of leaf length, ± bistratose. Lamina with scattered dorsal papillae,<br />

particularly near costa, and mostly with few ventral papillae, unistratose with bistratose<br />

spots and striae in upper part. Lamina cells in upper part rounded, slightly sinuose, 8–11 μm<br />

wide, in lower part wider and sinuose to nodulose, basal marginal cells with slightly<br />

thickened crosswalls. K+ red.<br />

Sporophytes abundant, shallowly immersed. Urn red-orange-brown, glossy, length/<br />

width ratio (1.3–)1.5–1.9–2.3(–2.5) (BLOM 1996), in Hungarian material 1.78–1.83, n = 2.<br />

Exothecial cells predominantly isodiametric and transversely rectangular, but also rectangular,<br />

forming an irregular pattern. Stomata 4–9 per urn. Peristome teeth 310–420 μm,<br />

squarrose-recurved, red, gradually tapering to a fine point, from entire to strongly and irregularly<br />

perforated in central part, densely papillose.<br />

In Hungary, S. confusum is the only member of the Strictum subgroup that grows on<br />

calcareous substrates, whereas S. papillosum and S. pruinosum grow on siliceous rocks. From<br />

those species, S. confusum differs by its less papillose lamina (Fig. 11E), with more papillae<br />

on the abaxial, fewer on the adaxial side of the leaf (S. pruinosum is strongly papillose on<br />

both sides: Fig. 30G, H). S. papillosum is similar in this respect (usually more papillae on<br />

the abaxial side than on the adaxial side), but differs by the lack of a distinct central strand<br />

and the peristome teeth erecto-patent (Fig. 25G, but squarrose when old). Other differences<br />

between S. confusum and S. pruinosum include the wider and more sinuose lamina cells<br />

(Figs 11D, 30F) and the narrower perichaetial leaves of the former species (Figs 11C, 30D).<br />

:InHungary,S. confusum was found on exposed concrete adjacent to dolomite.<br />

In Scandinavia, it grows in similar situations, on exposed calcareous substrates (BLOM 1996).<br />

: None.<br />

: 250 m a.s.l.<br />

Distribution of Schistidium confusum<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


<strong>THE</strong> <strong>GENUS</strong> <strong>SCHISTIDIUM</strong> <strong>IN</strong> <strong>HUNGARY</strong> 47<br />

Specimen examined: Buda Mts: 8580/1 Buda: Sas-hegy, on exposed concrete adjacent<br />

to dolomite, N 47° 28’ 59.5”, E 19° 01’ 09.3”, ca 250 m a.s.l., 28.03.2008, leg. P.<br />

Erzberger, herb. Erzberger, (B) 12896.<br />

H. H. Blom<br />

(Figs 13, 14)<br />

Plants medium-sized or small, forming dense or lax tufts of variable colour (olivaceous,<br />

brownish, black). Central strand distinct. Hair-point 0–1.1 mm, coarse and stiff,<br />

mostly somewhat flattened in lower part, but sometimes terete throughout, straight or<br />

more rarely irregularly curved in upper part, from shortly to longly and broadly decurrent or<br />

sometimes not decurrent, finely to coarsely spinulose-denticulate. Abaxial side of costa<br />

with scattered low papillae in upper part, more rarely smooth; leaf margins distantly and<br />

finely denticulate to papillose-denticulate in upper part, more rarely smooth. Lamina smooth,<br />

unistratose in lower part to irregularly bistratose in upper part. Lamina cells in upper part<br />

rounded, not or slightly sinuose, 8–9 μm wide, in lower part wider and sinuose, basal cells often<br />

noticeably wider than cells above, basal marginal cells with thickened crosswalls. K+ red.<br />

Sporophytes common, mostly deeply immersed. Urn orange-brown (yellowish when<br />

empty and becoming finely striolate), length/width ratio (1.3–)1.6–1.8–2.2 (BLOM 1996), in<br />

Hungarian material (1.2–)1.78 ±0.03(–2.6), n = 190. Exothecial cells predominantly elongate.<br />

Stomata 0–4(–6) per urn, sometimes ± rudimentary. Peristome teeth 300–450 μm, red,<br />

smooth or finely papillose-striated in lower part, papillae often in oblique rows.<br />

Very variable. The most common morph with denticulate leaf apices (Fig. 13C, D) and<br />

shortly elongate exothecial cells (Fig. 13I) is easily identified, but more deviant forms can<br />

be hard to name. They may closely resemble S. elegantulum or S. helveticum. According to<br />

our observations, the number of stomata can be greater than 6, the number given by BLOM<br />

(1996). This makes the differentiation between S. crassipilum and S. elegantulum subsp.<br />

wilsonii (8–16 stomata per urn, BLOM 1996) more problematic. S. elegantulum differs from<br />

S. crassipilum in the absence of a central strand and the structure of the hair-point, which is<br />

terete throughout in the former (Fig. 17), and usually distinctly flattened and somewhat<br />

broadened towards insertion in the latter species (Fig. 13B). See also the note under S.<br />

elegantulum. S. helveticum has a shorter hair-point of different structure (Fig. 21B, C), no<br />

stomata and a characteristically different exothecial cell pattern. (Fig. 21G, H).<br />

:InHungary(asinScandinavia)S. crassipilum is by far the most common<br />

Schistidium species on calcareous rocks (limestone, dolomite) or concrete, but it is also<br />

found more rarely on siliceous rock types (andesite, trachyte, breccia, sandstone, granite,<br />

basalt, muskovite) and basic or even acidic types of soil, in a great variety of conditions<br />

(dry or moist, exposed to the sun or shaded, even in caves, in northern or southern exposition,<br />

in forests or in open habitats, e.g. calcareous grasslands). A rather weedy species.<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


48 ERZBERGER, P. and SCHRÖDER, W.<br />

A B E F D<br />

C<br />

G<br />

I<br />

K<br />

H<br />

Schistidium crassipilum. = leaves; = leaf apices (B, C in lateral view,<br />

costa); E = perichaetial leaf; = perichaetial leaf apex; = capsule; , , = exothecial<br />

cells at mid urn / at lower third of urn / at base of urn; = part of peristome. Scale bar: A,<br />

E, G – 2 mm; F – 800 μm; B, C, D, I, K – 400 μm; H, J – 200 μm. [A–C, E–H, J–K: Erzberger<br />

12090; D, I: EGR Vajda 1941 (Pilishegy), del. Erzberger]<br />

J<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


<strong>THE</strong> <strong>GENUS</strong> <strong>SCHISTIDIUM</strong> <strong>IN</strong> <strong>HUNGARY</strong> 49<br />

: Amblystegium serpens, Anomodon attenuatus, Barbula unguiculata,<br />

Bryoerythrophyllum recurvirostrum, Bryum argenteum, B. cf. kunzei, B. moravicum,<br />

Ceratodon purpureus, Cirriphyllum tommasinii, Didymodon acutus, D. fallax, D. rigidulus,<br />

Ditrichum flexicaule, Eurhynchium hians, E. pulchellum, Grimmia laevigata, G. pulvinata,<br />

Hedwigia ciliata var. leucophaea, Homalothecium lutescens, Homomallium incurvatum,<br />

Leskea polycarpa, Orthotrichum anomalum, O. cupulatum, O. sp., Oxystegus tenuirostris,<br />

Pottia lanceolata, Pseudoleskeella catenulata, P. nervosa, Pylaisia polyantha, Schistidium<br />

apocarpum, S. brunnescens subsp. brunnescens, S. dupretii, S. elegantulum, S. helveticum, S.<br />

lancifolium, S. robustum, Seligeria pusilla, Thuidium abietinum, Tortella tortuosa, Tortula<br />

crinita, T. muralis, T. ruralis.<br />

: 83–910 m a.s.l.<br />

Distribution of Schistidium crassipilum<br />

Selected specimens examined: Aggtelek Karst: 7589/1 Comit. Abaúj-Torna. In rupibus<br />

calcareis apricis “Tohonya-bérc” prope Jósvafõ, 250 m, 01.05.1953, leg. Á. Boros, BP<br />

110956; : Garadna-Tal, angesprengte schattige, feuchte Kalkwand an<br />

der Straße ca 2 km östlich Ómassa, N 48° 06’ 43.8”, E 20° 32’ 19.6”, ca 460 m, 07.04.2007,<br />

leg. T. Pócs and P. Erzberger, herb. Erzberger, (B) 12119; : Comit.<br />

Heves. In declivibus dumetosis inter vallem rivi Csevice-patak et jugum montis Ágasvár<br />

supra pag. Tar, 300–600 m, 06.05.1928, leg. Á. Boros, BP 110920; :<br />

Com. Pest. In rupibus siccis in decl. montis Várhegy prope pag. Csõvár, montes Cserhát,<br />

17.03.1951, leg. L. Vajda, BP 5641; : Pest county. Babat valley,<br />

Gödöllõ city, basalt rock, oak forest-grassland transition, N 47.623°, E 19.384°, 200 m,<br />

11.03.2001, leg. P. Ódor, herb. Ódor, 20010311-10; : Comit. Hont.<br />

Hung. cent. In valle “Ernõ forrásvölgye” ad pag. Zebegény. Solo trachyt., 16.07.1928, leg.<br />

J. Szepesfalvi, BP 5709; : In saxis trachyticis rivuli Kõhegy ad<br />

Pomáz cottus Pest, 24.04.1904, leg. L. Simonkai, BP 5657; : Comit. Nógrád.<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


50 ERZBERGER, P. and SCHRÖDER, W.<br />

In monte Nagyszál supra Kosd, 10.09.1916, leg. Á. Degen, BP 46951; :<br />

Hung. centr., com. Pest. In rupibus calcareis montis Pilishegy supra pag. Pilisszentkereszt,<br />

01.06.1941, leg. L. Vajda, EGR; Comit. Pest. In rupibus calcareis sept. montis<br />

Oszoly prope Csobánka, 250 m, 31.03.1946, leg. Á. Boros, BP 110884; :<br />

Comit. Pest. In saxis calcar. pedis montis Zsíros-hegy prope pag. Budajenõ, 350 m,<br />

21.03.1948, leg. Á. Boros, BP 110887; : Szomód, Betlehem-vadászház,<br />

tölgyes-EF, árnyas mészkõ, N 47° 42.058’, E 18° 19.496’, 321 m, 26.08.2006, leg. P.<br />

Szûcs, herb. Szûcs, NYG 7; : Comit. Komárom. In rupibus calc. occid.<br />

dumetosis montis Lófõ supra pag. Várgesztes, 350 m, 12.05.1935, leg. Á. Boros, BP 110835;<br />

: Comit. Fejér. In rupibus graniticis montis Zsidó-hegy prope<br />

Pázmánd, 150–200 m, 27.06.1938, leg. Á. Boros, BP 110832; : Comit.<br />

Veszprém. In rupibus calc. vallis Cuhavölgy prope Csesznek, 350 m, 07.06.1928, leg. Á.<br />

Boros, BP 5679; : Hung. occid. Ad muros vinearum mtis “Badacsonyhegy”<br />

ad lac. Balaton. Solo basalt., 300 m, 11.08.1933, leg. J. Szepesfalvi, BP 39074;<br />

: Comit. Zala. In rupibus dolomit. sept. montis Rezi-vár prope Rezi,<br />

300–400 m, 23.03.1962, leg. Á. Boros, BP 110798; : Sopron, Bot. kert,<br />

muszkovit-szilikát sziklán, 04.02.2004, leg. P. Szûcs, herb. Szûcs, SOP/1; :<br />

Comit. Vas. In muris in arboreto ad Szeleste, 180 m, 10.06.1962, leg. Á. Boros, BP<br />

111371; : Comit. Zala. In rupibus calcar. eocen. ad fontem majorem ripae rivi<br />

Marcal prope Gyepükaján, 170 m, 15.09.1961, leg. Á. Boros, BP 110807; :<br />

Comitat Somogy Ad muros pr. pag. Inke, 180 m, 23.02. 1956, leg. Á. Károlyi, BP<br />

59108; : Mánfa. Téglakerítésen, 23.08.1931, leg. A. Visnya, BP<br />

111391; : Comit. Baranya. In rupestribus ad Sárga-bánya in monte<br />

Csukma prope pag. Máriagyüd, 200 m, 08.08.1999, leg. B. Papp, BP 166476; :<br />

Comit. Moson. In muris viae ferreae ad fluv. lajta prope pag. Hegyeshalom, 120 m,<br />

10.04.1920, leg. Á. Boros, BP 111360; : Comit.<br />

Csongrád. Sándorfalva. Tegmen lepidarium aggeri ad Sajtos, 83 m, 09.08. 1951, leg. L.<br />

Timár, BP 111355; : Com. Hajdú. In cippo in sepultura Felsõ-temetõ<br />

prope Hajdúnánás, 02.04.1941, leg. J. Igmándy, BP 111365; :<br />

Comit. Komárom. In saxis calcareis deportatis marginis alvei Danubii inter pagos<br />

Piszke et Lábatlan, 100 m, 15.02.1925, leg. Á. Boros, BP 110860.<br />

(Thér.) W. A. Weber<br />

(Figs 15, 16)<br />

Plants small, forming low tufts. Central strand distinct. Hair-point mostly very short,<br />

but rarely absent on all leaves, 0–0.15(–0.25) mm, weak and narrow throughout, erect,<br />

straight, not or very shortly and narrowly decurrent, from nearly smooth to distinctly<br />

spinulose. Costa and leaf margins smooth (BLOM 1996), but in some Hungarian specimens<br />

distinctly papillose in apical part (Fig. 15B, C). Lamina smooth, usually unistratose.<br />

Lamina cells (7.5–)8–9.5(–11) μm wide and not or slightly sinuose in upper part of leaf,<br />

wider and more sinuose below (Fig. 15E). Perichaetial leaves narrow (Fig. 15D), hardly<br />

concealing the urn. K+ red.<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


<strong>THE</strong> <strong>GENUS</strong> <strong>SCHISTIDIUM</strong> <strong>IN</strong> <strong>HUNGARY</strong> 51<br />

A<br />

B<br />

F<br />

H<br />

G<br />

K<br />

C<br />

D<br />

I<br />

E<br />

J<br />

Schistidium dupretii. =leaves; , =leafapices; = perichaetial leaf; E =lamina<br />

cells in lower part of leaf; = capsules in perichaetium; =capsule; , , = exothecial cells<br />

at urn mouth / mid urn / base of urn; = peristome tooth. Scale bar: A, D, F, G – 2 mm; B, I,<br />

K – 400 μm; C, E, H, J – 200 μm. [Erzberger 8056, del. Erzberger]<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


52 ERZBERGER, P. and SCHRÖDER, W.<br />

Sporophytes common, much exposed in lateral view (Fig. 15F). Urn red-brown,<br />

finely striolate after dehiscence, length / width ratio (1.2–)1.5–1.9–2.3(–2.6) (BLOM<br />

1996), in Hungarian material 1.85 ±0.3, n = 2. Exothecial cells irregular in size and shape,<br />

striolae composed of collapsed narrowly elongate cells. Stomata about 6 per urn. Peristome<br />

teeth (250–)290–380 μm, red, entire or rarely with median cracks in central part, finely<br />

papillose.<br />

Characteristic features of this species are the narrow hair-point (if present), which<br />

appears to be “glued on” to the leaf apex, being much narrower than the chlorophyllose<br />

part of the apex (Fig. 15A–C, F), and the capsule being well visible between the thin,<br />

appressed perichaetial leaves.<br />

: In Hungary, S. dupretii grows on ± exposed, dry limestone rocks or walls,<br />

but it has also been found on siliceous rock (trachyte); a wide substrate tolerance is also reported<br />

by BLOM (1996).<br />

: Schistidium apocarpum, S. crassipilum.<br />

: 250–375 m a.s.l.<br />

Distribution of Schistidium dupretii<br />

: : Ómassa, Vörös-kõ, top of limestone<br />

wall near stream, 375 m, 07.04.2007, leg. P. Erzberger and T. Pócs, herb. Erzberger,<br />

(B) 12117; : Comit. Pest Hung. centr. Ad pedem montis Kõhegy versus<br />

pag. Pomáz. Solo trachytico, 11.04.1928, leg. J. Szepesfalvi, BP 5651; :<br />

Buda: Sas-hegy, on exposed dolomite, N 47° 28’ 59.5”, E 19° 01’ 09.3”, ca 250 m<br />

a.s.l., 05.04.2002, leg. P. Erzberger, herb. Erzberger, (B) 8056.<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


<strong>THE</strong> <strong>GENUS</strong> <strong>SCHISTIDIUM</strong> <strong>IN</strong> <strong>HUNGARY</strong> 53<br />

H. H. Blom<br />

(Figs 17, 18)<br />

Plants medium-sized to large, forming mats or decumbent tufts. Central strand absent.<br />

Hair-point 0.3–1.0 mm, erect, ± pellucid, hyaline but often brownish at insertion<br />

(Fig. 17A, C), straight and stiff, terete, narrow throughout, not decurrent (the transition<br />

between the hyaline and the chlorophyllose part of the apex smooth), distantly<br />

spinulose-denticulate throughout. Costa and leaf margins smooth. Lamina smooth,<br />

unistratose with bistratose patches in upper part. Lamina cells not or slightly sinuose, predominantly<br />

isodiametric, in upper part 8–10 μm wide, in lower wider. K+ red.<br />

Sporophytes common, immersed, but partly visible among the perichaetial leaves.<br />

Urn straw-yellow to orange, becoming finely striolated when old, oval, widest at middle<br />

(narrowed towards mouth), length/width ratio 1.6–2.0–2.4 (BLOM 1996), in Hungarian<br />

material (1.4–)1.87 ±0.12(–2.5), n = 25. Exothecial cells predominantly elongate, 50–70 μm<br />

long. Stomata 6–8 per urn (8–16 in subsp. wilsonii). Peristome teeth 350–430 μm long,<br />

orange to red, entire or with narrow submarginal slits in central part, densely and coarsely<br />

papillose, in lower part smooth or with papillae more distantly arranged.<br />

S. elegantulum subsp. wilsonii (which has not yet been found in Hungary) differs<br />

from the typical subspecies in a broader and coarser hair-point that appears rather whitish<br />

(pellucid in subsp. elegantulum) and smooth (i.e. the spinulae are denser and smaller than<br />

in subsp. elegantulum and not visible with a hand lens). Other differences include growth<br />

form (dense tufts versus mats or decumbent tufts in subsp. elegantulum), hair-point length<br />

in perichaetial leaves (up to 1.0–1.5 mm versus up to 0.7–0.9 mm), costa width at leaf base<br />

(75–88 μm versus 53–78 μm), costa stratosity at leaf base (5–7 vs 4–5) and number of<br />

stomata (8–16 vs 6–8).<br />

In Hungarian plants of S. elegantulum, the hair-point appears smooth when viewed<br />

in low magnification (as in subsp. wilsonii), due to few / short spinulae as seen in the compound<br />

microscope. Otherwise, they possess the characteristics of subsp. elegantulum.<br />

The differentiation between S. elegantulum and S. crassipilum can be very difficult in<br />

Hungarian plants, although in other geographical regions (e.g. in Germany), S. elegantulum<br />

poses no problems. Some plants could be considered transitional between the two<br />

species, e.g. displaying sporophytes typical of S. elegantulum (oval urns with many stomata);<br />

but leaves characteristic of S. crassipilum. The converse situation is observed as well. Such<br />

plants have been placed in the latter, variable species during the present revision.<br />

: S. elegantulum typically grows on ± shaded limestone or dolomite boulders<br />

and rocks, sometimes on concrete; in Hungary it has rarely also been found on base-rich siliceous<br />

rock (basalt, andesite). In Scandinavia, S. elegantulum subsp. wilsonii is reported to<br />

grow on exposed to semi-shaded calcareous rocks, often on wall-tops.<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


54 ERZBERGER, P. and SCHRÖDER, W.<br />

A B C D E<br />

F<br />

H<br />

G<br />

Schistidium elegantulum. =leaves; =leafapex;C = subperichaetial leaf; =perichaetial<br />

leaf; = perichaetial leaf apex; =capsule; = exothecial cells at base of urn;<br />

= peristome tooth. In A and C the coloured part of the hair-point is stippled. Scale bar:<br />

A, C, D, F – 2 mm; B, E – 800 μm; H – 400 μm; G – 200 μm. [Erzberger 12125, del. Erzberger]<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


<strong>THE</strong> <strong>GENUS</strong> <strong>SCHISTIDIUM</strong> <strong>IN</strong> <strong>HUNGARY</strong> 55<br />

: Bryum capillare, Didymodon rigidulus, Leucodon sciuroides,<br />

Orthotrichum anomalum, Plagiochila porelloides, Pseudoleskeella nervosa, Schistidium<br />

apocarpum, S. crassipilum, S. helveticum, Tortella tortuosa, Tortula muralis, T. ruralis.<br />

: 82–910 m a.s.l.<br />

Distribution of Schistidium elegantulum<br />

: : Comit. Abaúj-Torna. In<br />

rupibus andesit. tophac. ad ruinam Regéci-várrom prope Regéc, 600 m, 03.11.1959, leg. Á.<br />

Boros, BP 111933 sub Grimmia commutata Hüben., rev. P.E. :<br />

Comit. Abaúj-Torna. In rupibus calcar. sept. silvat. montis Szádvár prope Szögliget, 450 m,<br />

01.05.1953, leg. Á. Boros, BP 106976; : Szentlélek: Örvény-kõ, niedriger<br />

Kalkblock in lichtem Quercetum, N48° 07’ 48.4”, E 20° 32’ 22.9”, 766 m, 07.04.2007, leg. P.<br />

Erzberger, herb. Erzberger, (B) 12125; Répáshuta, Három-kõ, auf Kalkstein in<br />

lichtem Wald, N 48° 03’ 41.0”, E 20° 28’ 54.1”, 820 m, 08.04.2007, leg. P. Erzberger, herb.<br />

Erzberger, (B) 12145; : Bergrutsch, auf Kalkstein, N 47° 50’ 24.7”, E 19° 07’<br />

49.6”, 350 m, 09.04.2007, leg. P. Szûcs and P. Erzberger, herb. Erzberger, (B) 12179;<br />

: Ex herb. C. Schilberszky, Farkasvölgy, mészkõ 02.05.1886, unknown collector,<br />

BP 5624; : Comit. Komárom. In rupibus calcareis montis<br />

Kõpite-hegy prope pag. Dunaalmás, 150–250 m, 27.04.1942, leg. Á. Boros, BP 110856;<br />

: Comit. Fejér. In rupibus dolomit. sept. montis Vár-hegy prope<br />

Csókakõ, 350–400 m, 20.08.1948, leg. Á. Boros, BP 111711; : Comit.<br />

Veszprém. Bakony. In valle Cuha-völgy, 28.05.1928, leg. Á. Degen, BP 5677;<br />

: Comit. Zala. In calcareis montis Péter-hegy supra Balatonarács, 200–300 m,<br />

02.04.1926, leg. Á. Boros, BP 110802; : In monte Szent György-hegy<br />

prope Tapolcza, 05.05.1912, leg. Á. Degen, BP 5673; : Sopron, Bot.<br />

kert, 61/7 parcella, betonon, 04.02.2004, leg. P. Szûcs, herb. Szûcs, SOP/2; :<br />

Comit. Baranya. In rupibus calcar. merid. montis Tubes prope Pécs, 600 m,<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


56 ERZBERGER, P. and SCHRÖDER, W.<br />

26.04.1962, leg. Á. Boros, BP 111397; : Comit. Baranya. In rupestribus<br />

in decl. merid. montis Szársomlyó prope pag. Nagyharsány, 200–300 m, 07.02.2000, leg. B.<br />

Papp, BP 166467; : [between Szeged and Hódmezõvásárhely]<br />

Algyõ felett, sajtos szék, pyrog. andesit kõ, 22.06.1928, leg. I. Gyõrffy, BP 86585;<br />

: Comit. Csongrád. Szeged. Sövényháza. Stratura “P…(?)-töltés” ad 1.<br />

gátõrház, 82 m, 21.04.1951, leg. L. Timár, BP 111353.<br />

(De Not.) Ochyra<br />

(Figs 19, 20)<br />

Plants small to medium-sized, forming dense, sometimes hoary cushions. Central<br />

strand narrow and indistinct. Hair-point 0.15–0.85 mm, straight or slightly bent, weak and<br />

flattened, wide or narrow at insertion, not or shortly decurrent, finely and distantly<br />

denticulate. Costa and leaf margins smooth. Lamina smooth, unistratose or occasionally<br />

with bistratose spots in upper part. Lamina cells in upper part transversely ovate to shortly<br />

oblong, not or slightly sinuose, in lower part slightly sinuose, 7–9(–10) μm wide throughout<br />

except for wider basal cells. Basal marginal cells square to shortly rectangular, with<br />

± strongly thickened cross-walls, forming a rectangular alar group. Perichaetial leaves much<br />

larger than vegetative leaves (compare Fig. 19A and C), concave and plicate, with hairpoints<br />

up to 1.0 mm, wide in lower part and embracing a large portion of the upper lamina,<br />

but not or very shortly decurrent. K+ yellow.<br />

Sporophytes common, deeply immersed and often completely hidden in lateral view.<br />

Seta short, 0.05–0.13(–0.28) mm. Urn yellowish brown to orange brown, with a conspicuous<br />

bright red rim at the mouth, length/width ratio 0.9–1.3 (BLOM 1996), in Hungarian<br />

material 1.17, n = 1. Exothecial cells rectangular in lower half (Fig. 19H, I), irregular in<br />

shape in upper half (Fig. 19G). Stomata small and obscure, 3–6(–8)per urn. Peristome<br />

teeth rudimentary, 17–25 μm, consisting of short basal segments not or only shortly extending<br />

beyond the capsule mouth (but sometimes up to 320 μm long: BLOM 1996: p. 177,<br />

not seen in Hungarian specimens). Operculum mamillate, not rostrate.<br />

Usually an easily recognised species, with a unique combination of short and wide<br />

urn (Fig. 19E), rudimentary peristome and mamillate operculum. Superficially resembling<br />

Grimmia anodon in the lack of a well-developed peristome, but that species grows on calcareous<br />

rocks, not on siliceous rock as S. flaccidum.<br />

: In Hungary, S. flaccidum grows on exposed andesite and other volcanic<br />

rock; this tallies with its preference for siliceous substrata in other parts of its distribution<br />

area (Europe, North America; BLOM 1996).<br />

: Bryum moravicum, Grimmia laevigata, G. muehlenbeckii.<br />

: 320–355 m a.s.l.<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


<strong>THE</strong> <strong>GENUS</strong> <strong>SCHISTIDIUM</strong> <strong>IN</strong> <strong>HUNGARY</strong> 57<br />

A B C F<br />

E<br />

D<br />

G<br />

H<br />

I<br />

Schistidium flaccidum. =leaf; =leafapex; = perichaetial leaf; = perichaetial<br />

leaf apex; = capsule; = Exothecial cells at mouth of urn /shortly above mid urn / at<br />

base of urn (H + I). Scale bar: A, C, E – 2 mm; B, D – 800 μm; G, H – 400 μm; F, I – 200 μm.<br />

[Erzberger 6343, del. Erzberger]<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


58 ERZBERGER, P. and SCHRÖDER, W.<br />

S. flaccidum was known in Hungary from two locations, one near<br />

Pomáz in the Visegrád Mts and one between Nagymaros and Zebegény, on the left side of<br />

the Danube. Phytogeographically this site, Mt Szentmihály or Mt Ördög, belongs to the<br />

Visegrád Mts (BOROS 1968). Here the plant was apparently found only once (SZEPESFALVI<br />

1941), and only a single, very small specimen exists in BP, whereas at the Pomáz site, in the<br />

year 2000, the population was still present and vigorous. From this site, numerous collections<br />

exist, the oldest from 1921 (leg. Gyõrffy). S. flaccidum grows on the treeless, sunny<br />

slopes of the hill Kis Csikóvár, in fissures of andesite rock outcrops. Recently, B. Papp discovered<br />

a third locality at Szarvaskõ in the Bükk Mts.<br />

Distribution of Schistidium flaccidum<br />

: : , Szarvaskõ, vártól ÉK-re, sziklagyep,<br />

volcanic rocks, N 47° 59’ 35.3”, E 20° 19’ 48.3”, 355 m, 04.06.2008, leg. B. Papp, BP<br />

175454; : Comit. Hont, Hungariae centr. In fissuris rupium andesit.<br />

inter pag. Zebegény et Nagymaros, 07.1927, leg. J. Szepesfalvi, BP 5586; Comit.<br />

Pest. In rupium fissuris montis Kis Csikóvár ad Pomáz, sol. andesit., 320 m, 01.04.1923,<br />

leg. Á. Degen, BP 163958 (numerous dupl.); Pomáz, Kis Csikóvár, 09.08.2000, leg. P.<br />

Erzberger, herb. Erzberger, (B) 6343.<br />

(Schkuhr) Deguchi<br />

(Figs 21, 22)<br />

Plants medium-sized to large, ± glossy, in upper part jet-black or olivaceous, forming<br />

tufts. Central strand distinct. Hair-point short, but rarely absent on all leaves, 0–0.2 mm,<br />

coarse and ± terete, coarsely spinulose with short and broad, patent to squarrose spinulae.<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


<strong>THE</strong> <strong>GENUS</strong> <strong>SCHISTIDIUM</strong> <strong>IN</strong> <strong>HUNGARY</strong> 59<br />

A B C D E<br />

H<br />

G<br />

F<br />

I J K L<br />

Schistidium helveticum. =leaves; , =leafapices; = perichaetial leaf; = perichaetial<br />

leaf apex; = capsule; , = exothecial cells in mid urn; , , = peristome teeth;<br />

= part of peristome. Scale bar: A, D, F – 2 mm; B, E – 800 μm; H, J–L – 400 μm; C, G, I –<br />

200 μm. [A–F, K, L: Erzberger 8015; G–J: Erzberger 12188, del. Erzberger]<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


60 ERZBERGER, P. and SCHRÖDER, W.<br />

Costa and margins usually smooth, but sometimes with few papillae immediately below<br />

apex (Blom, pers. comm. in CASPARI 2004). Lamina smooth, irregularly bistratose or more<br />

rarely unistratose with bistratose patches in upper part. Lamina cells rounded, esinuose,<br />

(6–)7–8(–9) μm wide in upper part of leaf, 7–10 μm wide and slightly to strongly sinuose<br />

in central and lower parts of leaf. K+ red.<br />

Sporophytes common, deeply immersed, but partly exposed in lateral view. Urn yellowish<br />

to orange-brown, length / width ratio (1.4–)1.6–1.9–2.3(–2.5) (BLOM 1996), in Hungarian<br />

material (1.4–)1.6 ±0.14(–1.9), n = 7. Exothecial cells variable in size and shape, in<br />

central and lower part predominantly elongate, forming an irregular pattern (Fig. 21G, H).<br />

Stomata absent. Peristome teeth 300–430(–460) μm, orange to reddish, ending in a conical<br />

or flattened horizontal bar, often split in prongs at top, ± semi-perforated in lower part,<br />

strongly perforated to cribrose in upper part (Fig. 21I–L).<br />

Habitat: On often dry, more rarely humid calcareous rocks (limestone, dolomite) in<br />

usually open vegetation, often exposed to the sun. This habitat preference of Hungarian<br />

plants is the same as that reported in BLOM (1996).<br />

: Bryum argenteum, Didymodon acutus, D. luridus, D. rigidulus,<br />

Grimmia tergestina, Schistidium brunnescens subsp. brunnescens, S. crassipilum, S. elegantulum.<br />

: 200–600 m a.s.l.<br />

Distribution of Schistidium helveticum<br />

: : Comit. Borsod-Abaúj-<br />

Zemplén. In rupibus calcareis supra vallem Jósva-völgy contra vallem Almás-völgy, 220 m,<br />

17.08.1988, leg. M. Rajczy, BP 165391; : Eger-Felnémet, Berva-völgy,<br />

auf exponiertem Kalkfels, 350 m, 03.04.2002, leg. T. Pócs and P. Erzberger, herb. Erzberger,<br />

(B) 8015, dupl. in EGR; : Vác, Dolomit-Felsrasen Látó-hegy, N 47° 50’<br />

11.6”, E 19° 07’ 59.2”, ca 500 m, 09.04.2007, leg. P. Erzberger and P. Szûcs, herb. Erzberger,<br />

(B) 12188; : Comit. Esztergom. In rupibus calcareis or. montis Öreg-szirt<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


<strong>THE</strong> <strong>GENUS</strong> <strong>SCHISTIDIUM</strong> <strong>IN</strong> <strong>HUNGARY</strong> 61<br />

prope Kesztölc, 450 m, 14.04.1946, leg. Á. Boros, BP 111736; : Com.<br />

Pest. In rupibus calcareis montis Telkihegy prope pag. Telki, 22.03.1948, leg. L. Vajda, BP<br />

58480; : Comit. Esztergom. In rupibus calcareis montis Öregkõ<br />

prope Bajót, 300–375 m, 05.04.1936, leg. Á. Boros, BP 110846; : Csákberény,<br />

Ugró-völgy, auf w-exponierten, besonnten niedrigen Dolomitfelsen, 29.04.2001,<br />

leg. P. Erzberger, herb. Erzberger, (B) 7081; : Comit. Baranya. In<br />

rupibus calcar. merid. montis Tubes prope Pécs, 600 m, 26.04.1962, leg. Á. Boros, BP<br />

111398; : Comit. Baranya. In rupestribus calcar. montis Tenkes-hegy<br />

prope Máriagyüd, 300–400 m, 17.04.1942, leg. Á. Boros, BP 111384.<br />

(Kindb.) H. H. Blom<br />

(Figs 23, 24)<br />

Plants small to medium-sized, forming lax tufts. Central strand absent or indistinct.<br />

Hair-point short or absent, 0–0.3 mm, decurrent, sharply and strongly spinulose-denticulate.<br />

Costa distantly papillose in upper (1/2–)2/3–4/5 of the leaf length with papillae increasing<br />

in height towards the leaf apex (about 8 μm wide and 9–11 μm high in apical part).<br />

Margins irregular dentate in upper part with teeth pointing in various directions. Lamina<br />

unistratose, smooth or rarely with few papillae on the abaxial side near apex. Lamina cells<br />

sinuose, 7–10 μm wide in upper part, (8–)9–10 μm wide in lower parts of leaf. K+ red.<br />

Sporophytes usually present, mostly shallowly immersed and much exposed in lateral<br />

view. Urn dark red to reddish-brown, small, 0.7–0.85–1 mm long, length / width ratio<br />

1.3–1.5–1.7 (BLOM 1996), in Hungarian material (0.9–)1.3 ±0.08(–1.6), n = 33. Exothecial<br />

cells thin-walled, short transversely rectangular and isodiametric, square, arranged in<br />

regular perpendicular rows (Figs 1F, G, 23G–I). Stomata large, 6–10 per urn. Peristome<br />

teeth 320–400 μm, orange, semi-perforated in lower part, from almost entire to strongly<br />

perforated in upper part.<br />

Usually an easily known plant with a unique combination of apically papillose costa<br />

and margins, with the size of papillae increasing towards the apex (Fig. 23B, C) and small<br />

capsules exhibiting a characteristic pattern of exothecial cells. In moist shaded habitats,<br />

costal papillae may be confined to the apical part of the leaf. S. apocarpum differs from S.<br />

lancifolium by its larger size in nearly all aspects (leaf length, width, urn length, width, peristome<br />

teeth length – compare Figs 4 and 23), but there is a small overlap in these quantitative<br />

characters.<br />

In Hungary, S. lancifolium is a typical plant of shaded andesite rocks, with a preference<br />

for higher altitudes. In Scandinavia, this species is an early pioneer on dry acidic to<br />

slightly basic (typically greenstone, but very occasionally also limestone) cliffs and boulders<br />

in relatively dense and moist forests (WEIBULL 2006).<br />

: On shaded siliceous (andesite, porphyric rock, slate, sandstone) or more<br />

rarely calcareous rock (dolomite), often near streams or flushes and in ravines, in forests,<br />

preferably, but not exclusively at higher altitude (700–900 m).<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


62 ERZBERGER, P. and SCHRÖDER, W.<br />

A<br />

C<br />

B<br />

C<br />

D<br />

C<br />

A<br />

E<br />

F<br />

G<br />

I<br />

J<br />

H<br />

Schistidium lancifolium. = leaves; = upper parts of leaves; = leaf apices;<br />

= perichaetial leaf; = upper part of perichaetial leaf; = capsules; , , = exothecial<br />

cellsinmidurn/atbaseofurn(H+I); = peristome tooth. Scale bar: A, D, F – 2 mm; B,<br />

E – 800 μm; C, I, J – 400 μm; G, H – 200 μm. [A–F, J: Erzberger 6136; G, I: EGR, Vajda<br />

1958 (Börzsöny, Rakottyás-bérc); H: EGR, Boros 1957 (Börzsöny, Bacsina-patak), del.<br />

Erzberger]<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


<strong>THE</strong> <strong>GENUS</strong> <strong>SCHISTIDIUM</strong> <strong>IN</strong> <strong>HUNGARY</strong> 63<br />

: Apometzgeria pubescens, Brachythecium populeum, B.<br />

velutinum, Bryum capillare, Ceratodon purpureus, Ctenidium molluscum, Didymodon<br />

insulanus, D. rigidulus, D. vinealis, Grimmia hartmanii, Hedwigia ciliata, Homalia besseri,<br />

Isothecium alopecuroides, Lophocolea minor, Mnium stellare, Plagiochila porelloides,<br />

Rhynchostegium murale, Schistidium apocarpum, S. crassipilum, Seligeria pusilla, Thuidium<br />

abietinum, Tortella tortuosa, Tortula ruralis.<br />

: 120–900 m a.s.l.<br />

Distribution of Schistidium lancifolium<br />

: : Hungaria bor.-or., com.<br />

Zemplén. In rupibus andesiticis montis Szappanyos supra vall. Radványpatak völgye<br />

prope pag. Sárospatak, 11.09.1946, leg. L. Vajda, EGR; : Comit. Borsod.<br />

In rupibus porphyrit. sept. silvat. montis “Nagy István erõse” prope Nagyvisnyó, 900 m,<br />

30.09.1950, leg. Á. Boros, BP 110942; : Heves county, Kékes North-<br />

Forest Reserve, Mátraháza village, andesite rock, montane beech forest, N 47.874°, E<br />

020.007°, 800–900 m, 10.05.1996, leg. P. Ódor, herb. Ódor, 19960510-2, dupl. in BP;<br />

: Comit. Nógrád. In rupibus umbrosis montis Rakottyás-bérc supra<br />

vallem rivi Bacsina-patak prope Királyháza, montes Börzsöny, 20.05.1958, EGR, dupl. BP<br />

59580; : Szerkövek. Az andezit sziklacsoport északi oldalának<br />

aljában, 650 m, 11.1984, leg. G. Kis, EGR; : Budapest. In silvis sept.<br />

montis Csúcs-hegy ad Óbuda, 300–400 m, 15.03.1941, leg. Á. Boros, BP 106900;<br />

: Comit. Fejér. In rupibus dolom. dumetosis vallis Balog-völgy supra Csákvár,<br />

250 m, 10.09.1953, leg. Á. Boros, BP 110831; Comit. Fejér. In rupibus dolomiticis<br />

Papirtás prope Csákberény, 300–400 m, 29.03.1936, leg. Á. Boros, BP 110833;<br />

Comit. Bereg. Ad saxa andesit. pedis montis Nagy-hegy pr. Tarpa, 120 m,<br />

15.03.1961, leg. Á. Boros, BP 111358.<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


64 ERZBERGER, P. and SCHRÖDER, W.<br />

(Figs 25, 26)<br />

Culm.<br />

Plants small to large, in upper part often reddish, forming lax or dense tufts or mats.<br />

Central strand absent or rarely narrow and indistinct. Hair-point 0–1.25 mm, thin,<br />

flexuose, from shortly to longly and widely decurrent, slightly to strongly spinulose-denticulate<br />

in lower part, distantly denticulate to smooth in upper part. Costa ± densely papillose<br />

on abaxial side (papillae 6–8 μm wide and 5–11 μm tall). Margins ± papillose-denticulate<br />

in upper part of leaf. Lamina unistratose or with bistratose spots in upper part, ± densely<br />

papillose on abaxial side (papillae 6–7(–9) μm wide and 5–8 μm tall), on the adaxial side<br />

scattered papillae particularly near the margins. Lamina cells incrassate, sinuose, 8–10 μm<br />

wide in upper, 8–11 wide in central and lower parts of leaf. K+ red.<br />

Sporophytes common, from deeply immersed to emergent. Urn dark reddish, widest<br />

at about middle, length/width ratio 1.5–1.9–2.3(–2.8) (BLOM 1996), in Hungarian material<br />

1.81, n = 1. Exothecial cells transversely rectangular and square. Stomata 10–17 per urn.<br />

Peristome teeth (310–)330–500 μm, reddish, gradually narrowed into a long, fine point,<br />

entire or with few to several median or submarginal perforations.<br />

When growing in sufficiently sun-lit places, S. papillosum usually (but not always) develops<br />

red-coloured spots in the lamina of upper leaves, which are diagnostic. In other respects,<br />

e.g. papillosity, hair-point length, this species is highly variable.<br />

: In Scandinavia, S. papillosum grows on both acidic and basic rock (from<br />

granite to limestone, but becoming more calcifuge towards the south) and occurs in dense<br />

forests as well as at exposed sites in open pastures (BLOM 1996, WEIBULL 2006). It prefers<br />

acid rocks in Catalonia (CASAS et al. 2001).<br />

In Hungary, this species was only recently discovered during fieldwork of the first<br />

author, and is presently known from a single location in the Bükk Mts, in the valley<br />

Lök-völgy near Felsõtárkány, where it grows in open vegetation on aleurolitic slate near<br />

the road, associated with S. apocarpum and S. pruinosum.<br />

: 445 m a.s.l.<br />

Specimen examined: Bükk Mts: 7988/4 Felsõtárkány, Lök-völgy, aleurolite slate<br />

rocks at road, N 48° 01’ 51.1”, E 20° 28’ 46.5”, 445 m, 06.04.2007, leg. P. Erzberger and T.<br />

Pócs, herb. Erzberger, (B) 12097.<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


<strong>THE</strong> <strong>GENUS</strong> <strong>SCHISTIDIUM</strong> <strong>IN</strong> <strong>HUNGARY</strong> 65<br />

B<br />

B<br />

H<br />

A<br />

C<br />

D<br />

F<br />

I<br />

G<br />

E K J<br />

Schistidium papillosum. = leaves; = leaf apices; C = perichaetial leaves; ,<br />

= lamina cells at mid leaf / at widest part of leaf; = papillae and lamina cells at abaxial<br />

side of leaf; =capsule; , , = exothecial cells at mouth of urn / at mid urn / at base of urn;<br />

= peristome tooth. Scale bar: A, C, G – 2 mm; B, I, K – 400 μm; D, E, F, H, J – 200 μm.<br />

[Erzberger 12097, del. Erzberger]<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


66 ERZBERGER, P. and SCHRÖDER, W.<br />

Distribution of Schistidium papillosum<br />

(Mitt.) H. Perss.<br />

(Figs 27, 29)<br />

Plants small to medium-sized, forming dense or lax tufts. Central strand distinct, but<br />

narrow. Hair-point 0–0.3 mm, frequently yellow or reddish in lower part or throughout,<br />

thin and narrow, not decurrent. Costa smooth, margins entire or irregularly denticulate just<br />

below apex. Lamina smooth, in upper and central parts partly bistratose or more rarely unistratose.<br />

Lamina cells slightly incrassate, collenchymatous, in upper part of leaf ± isodiametric<br />

and shortly elongate, 9–11 μm wide, in central and lower parts more elongate.<br />

K+ red.<br />

Sporophytes occasional to frequent, immersed. Urn yellowish to red-brown, subspherical<br />

to obovoid (cyathiform when old), length/width ratio 0.8–1.3 (BLOM 1998), not<br />

measured in Hungarian material. Exothecial cells thin-walled or slightly incrassate, in central<br />

and lower part of urn predominantly shortly elongate, forming a ± regular pattern.<br />

Stomata absent. Peristome teeth 380–570 μm, red, tapering to a narrow point, semiperfoated<br />

in lower part, strongly irregularly perforated in upper part. Spores finely<br />

granulose, 16–24 μm.<br />

This is in Hungary the only species of the Rivulare group, which is characterised<br />

by spores (16–24 μm) larger than those of the Schistidium apocarpum complex<br />

((8–)9–10.4–12(–19) μm).<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


<strong>THE</strong> <strong>GENUS</strong> <strong>SCHISTIDIUM</strong> <strong>IN</strong> <strong>HUNGARY</strong> 67<br />

A B C<br />

D<br />

F<br />

E<br />

G<br />

I<br />

H<br />

Schistidium platyphyllum. = leaves; = perichaetial leaf; = leaf apex; = capsule;<br />

, = exothecial cells at mouth of urn / at mid urn; , = seta surface cells in upper /<br />

lower part of seta; = part of peristome. Scale bar: A, B, D – 2 mm; I – 400 μm; C, E–H –<br />

200 μm. [A–C, E–H: BP 163340; D, I: Erzberger 12625 (Sweden, Abisko), del. Erzberger]<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


68 ERZBERGER, P. and SCHRÖDER, W.<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

G<br />

D<br />

F<br />

E<br />

Schistidium rivulare (Erzberger 6529, Germany: Hessen). = leaves; = leaf<br />

apex; =capsule; , = exothecial cells at mid urn / at base of urn; = seta surface cells<br />

in upper part of seta; = peristome tooth. Scale bar: A, C – 2 mm; G – 400 μm; B, D, F –<br />

200 μm. [Del. Erzberger]<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


<strong>THE</strong> <strong>GENUS</strong> <strong>SCHISTIDIUM</strong> <strong>IN</strong> <strong>HUNGARY</strong> 69<br />

From S. rivulare (which has not yet been found in Hungary – Fig. 28), it can be distinguished<br />

by gametophytic characters, e.g. the entire leaf margins (except at apex – compare<br />

Figs 27C and 28B) and the more shallowly keeled, symmetric leaves (sharply keeled<br />

and often asymmetrically secund in S. rivulare: Fig. 28A), and sporophytic characters, particularly<br />

the patterns of exothecial cells and seta surface cells (exothecial cells isodiametric<br />

and incrassate in S. rivulare: Fig. 28D, E), shortly elongate and rather thin-walled in<br />

S. platyphyllum (Fig. 27F); seta surface cells ± strongly elongate, incrassate in S. rivulare<br />

(Fig. 28F), shortly elongate to isodiametric and rather thin-walled in S. platyphyllum:<br />

Fig. 27G), and by the absence of stomata.<br />

Habitat: In Scandinavia S. platyphyllum grows on base-rich or calcareous rocks in or<br />

beside streams (rarely submerged), occasionally in fissures of irrigated ledges and cliffs in<br />

the mountains, or on regularly inundated sea- or lake-shore boulders (BLOM 1998,<br />

WEIBULL 2006). In NW Germany it was found mainly on siliceous blocks at the rivers Elbe,<br />

Weser, Ems, Rhine and some of their tributaries (ME<strong>IN</strong>UNGER and SCHRÖDER 2007). The<br />

Hungarian habitat on block edging at the banks of the Danube corresponds to the German<br />

type of lowland habitat on river banks.<br />

: 100 m a.s.l.<br />

: In Hungary at present known from a single collection.<br />

Distribution of Schistidium platyphyllum<br />

: Comit. Pest. In saxis irrigatis<br />

Danubii ad urb. Szentendre, 100 m, 11.08.1994, leg. B. Papp and M. Rajczy (sub S. rivulare),<br />

rev. P. Erzberger 2007, conf. W. Schröder 2007, BP 163340.<br />

The plants conserved in this specimen were growing on stones in the inundation area<br />

at the Danube in the small island “Pap-sziget“ near Szentendre (B. Papp, ex verbis). A recent<br />

search of the site and of similar places near Szentendre and in the Danube valley<br />

between Szob and Vác by the first author was unsuccessful.<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


70 ERZBERGER, P. and SCHRÖDER, W.<br />

This record represents a considerable range extension within the European area of S.<br />

platyphyllum, viz. towards the river Danube in the southeastern part of Central Europe.<br />

The species was hitherto known from Asia, Africa, America, Greenland, Svalbard (SMITH<br />

2004), and in Europe from Scandinavia (BLOM 1998), Great Britain (SMITH 2004), and<br />

Germany (HOMM 1998, SIEMSEN et al. 2003, SCHULZ and DENGLER 2006, ME<strong>IN</strong>UNGER<br />

and SCHRÖDER 2007). In the meantime, S. platyphyllum has been discovered in South Germany,<br />

at a tributary of the Danube, too (“Innschleife auf Uferpackungen bei Ebing, 7740/4,<br />

15.05.1998”, leg. W. S. sub S. rivulare, rev. 01.03.2008; in ME<strong>IN</strong>UNGER and SCHRÖDER 2007<br />

erroneously under S. rivulare). Its discovery in the Austrian part of the Danube valley is to<br />

be expected sooner or later.<br />

(Wilson ex Schimp.) G. Roth<br />

(Figs 30, 31)<br />

Plants medium-sized, forming dense, often hoary tufts. Central strand narrow but<br />

distinct. Hair-point 0.2–1.25 mm, ± coarse, not or shortly and broadly decurrent, densely<br />

spinulose in lower, more distantly spinulose in upper part. Abaxial side of costa densely<br />

papillose (papillae 3–6 μm wide and tall), margins ± smooth except at dentate apex.<br />

Lamina partly bistratose in upper part, densely papillose with low, broad papillae (3–4.5 μm<br />

wide and tall) on both adaxial and abaxial sides of leaf. Lamina cells rounded, not or<br />

slightly sinuose in upper part, mostly sinuose in central and lower parts, 6–9 μm wide<br />

throughout except for wider basal cells. Perichaetial leaves large and conspicuous, broadly<br />

elliptical or broadly ovate, 0.8–1.25 mm wide, strongly contrasting the lower leaves<br />

(0.6–0.85(–1.0) mm wide). K+ red.<br />

Sporophytes common, deeply immersed. Urn dark red to red-brown with a motherof-pearl<br />

shine, widest at middle (narrowed towards mouth), length / width ratio<br />

(1.2–)1.3–1.5–1.8(–1.9) (BLOM 1996), in Hungarian material (1.5–)1.6 ±0.05(–1.7), n = 6.<br />

Exothecial cells predominantly square. Stomata 6–8 per urn. Peristome teeth<br />

270–390(–450) μm, reddish, in lower part entire or semi-perforated, in upper part mostly<br />

strongly perforated with narrow slits.<br />

S. pruinosum differs from other species with papillose lamina in the elliptical perichaetial<br />

leaves contrasting the narrower lower leaves (compare Fig. 30A and D), the small<br />

rounded and oval upper leaf cells (Fig. 30E), the irregularly bistratose lamina, the distinct<br />

central strand and the papillae usually abundant on both sides of the leaf, arranged in<br />

oblique rows (Fig. 30G, H).<br />

: In Hungary on rather exposed or more rarely shaded siliceous rocks (andesite,<br />

aleurolitic slate), in Scandinavia on ± exposed, often warm, base-rich or siliceous (especially<br />

basalt and porphyric) rocks (BLOM 1998).<br />

: Hypnum cupressiforme, Schistidium apocarpum, S. papillosum.<br />

: 200–730 m a.s.l.<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


<strong>THE</strong> <strong>GENUS</strong> <strong>SCHISTIDIUM</strong> <strong>IN</strong> <strong>HUNGARY</strong> 71<br />

A B J<br />

D<br />

C<br />

I<br />

M<br />

G<br />

H<br />

E<br />

F<br />

L<br />

Schistidium pruinosum. = leaf; , = leaf apices; = perichaetial leaves; ,<br />

= lamina cells at mid leaf / at lower third of leaf; , = papillae and lamina cells at<br />

abaxial / adaxial side of leaf; = capsule; , , = exothecial cells at mouth of urn / at mid<br />

urn / at base of urn; M = peristome tooth. Scale bar: A, D, I – 2 mm; B – 800 μm; C, K, M –<br />

400 μm; E–H, J, L – 200 μm. [A–H, J–M: BP 171483; I: Erzberger 12095, del. Erzberger]<br />

K<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


72 ERZBERGER, P. and SCHRÖDER, W.<br />

Distribution of Schistidium pruinosum<br />

: : Nagy szárkõ/Regéc,<br />

665–695 m, 04.04.2004, leg. B. Papp, BP 171483; 7695/3 Hungaria bor.-or., com. Zemplén.<br />

In rupibus umbrosis in sylvestribus montis Darnó supra pag. Hercegkút, 04.09.1948, leg. L.<br />

Vajda, EGR; : Felsõtárkány, Lök-völgy, aleurolite slate rocks at road, N<br />

48° 01’ 51.1”, E 20° 28’ 46.5”, 445 m, 06.04.2007, leg. P. Erzberger and T. Pócs, herb.<br />

Erzberger, (B) 12095; Lehmschieferfelsen an der Straßenböschung zwischen<br />

Bükkzsérc und Felsõtárkány, mit Hypnum cupressiforme, N 47° 59’ 43.4”, E 20° 28’ 59.5”, ca<br />

400 m, 27.03.2008, leg. P. Erzberger and T. Pócs, herb. Erzberger, (B) 12883; :<br />

Comit. Heves. In rupibus andesit. septen. montis Disznókõ prope Parád, 730 m,<br />

25.03.1951, leg. Á. Boros, BP 110915; : Comit. Hont, Hung. centr.<br />

In saxis vallis “Malomvölgy” sub mont. “Nagycsitár” inter pag. Zebegény et Kóspallag, 200 m,<br />

07.07.1927, leg. J. Szepesfalvi, BP 5723.<br />

(Nees et Hornsch.) H. H. Blom<br />

(Figs 32, 33)<br />

Plants medium-sized to large, forming small or large, typically conspicuously hoary<br />

tufts. Central strand distinct, mostly broad. Hair-point ± coarse, mostly long and conspicuous,<br />

(0.2–)0.4–0.8(–1.1) mm, stiff and straight, decurrent, densely and evenly spinulose<br />

with sharp, strongly protruding spinulae. Costa and margins smooth. Lamina smooth,<br />

unistratose or less frequently with bistratose spots. Lamina cells mostly elongated and becoming<br />

shorter towards apex, (8–)9–10(–11) μm wide in upper, 8–11 μm wide in central and<br />

lower parts of leaf, sinuose to strongly sinuose with incrassate walls. K+ red.<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


<strong>THE</strong> <strong>GENUS</strong> <strong>SCHISTIDIUM</strong> <strong>IN</strong> <strong>HUNGARY</strong> 73<br />

A<br />

B<br />

D<br />

G<br />

C<br />

H<br />

E<br />

J<br />

F<br />

I<br />

Schistidium robustum. = leaf; = leaf apex; = perichaetial leaf; = perichaetial<br />

leaf apex; = lamina cells at widest part of leaf; = capsule; , , = exothecial<br />

cells at mouth of urn / at lower third / at base of urn; = part of peristome. Scale bar: A, C, F<br />

– 2 mm; B, D – 800 μm; H, J – 400 μm; E, G, I – 200 μm. [Erzberger 8024, del. Erzberger]<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


74 ERZBERGER, P. and SCHRÖDER, W.<br />

Sporophytes common, shallowly immersed, much exposed in lateral view. Urn light<br />

brown, sometimes faintly striolate, widest at about middle, length/width ratio (1.9–)2.1–2.4–3.1<br />

(BLOM 1996), in Hungarian material 2.15, n = 1. Exothecial cells irregular in size and shape,<br />

predominantly elongate. Stomata 8–10(–12) per urn. Peristome teeth 300–440 μm, orangered,<br />

narrow and longly tapering to a very thin and fragile point, frequently perforated.<br />

In typical plants, the strongly sinuose, incrassate leaf cells, somewhat resembling<br />

those in Racomitrium, are very characteristic (Fig. 32E). Plants from moist, shaded habitats<br />

can have less sinuose leaf cells. S. robustum can superficially approach S. elegantulum,<br />

but differs in the decurrent hair-point (Fig. 32B), usually not pronounced leaf bistratosity,<br />

a distinct central strand, and in leaf areolation as well as urn shape, long and narrow in S.<br />

robustum (Fig. 32F).<br />

: In Hungary as in Scandinavia S. robustum grows on ± dry calcareous rocks<br />

(limestone, dolomite) in exposed or moderately shaded sites.<br />

: Schistidium crassipilum.<br />

: 200–770 m a.s.l.<br />

Distribution of Schistidium robustum<br />

Selected specimens examined: Bükk Mts: 8088/1 Felsõtárkány, Mész-völgy, auf<br />

grobem Kalkschotter, 03.04.2002, leg. P. Erzberger and T. Pócs, herb. Erzberger, (B) 8024;<br />

: Comit. Pest: in m. Pilis, 19.09.1909, leg. G. Lengyel, BP 110898;<br />

: Comit. Fejér. In saxis dolom. silvat. versus Várgesztes prope Vérteskozma,<br />

400 m, 24.04.1932, leg. Á. Boros, BP 110826; : Mons Tobán, ad rupes,<br />

10.06.1932, collector unknown, BP 26270; : County Veszprém.<br />

On exposed calcareous rock Szamár-kõ in valley Kígyós-völgy at Balatongyörök, 200 m,<br />

18.10. 1999, leg. B. Papp BP 166860.<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


<strong>THE</strong> <strong>GENUS</strong> <strong>SCHISTIDIUM</strong> <strong>IN</strong> <strong>HUNGARY</strong> 75<br />

ARTIFICIAL KEY FOR <strong>SCHISTIDIUM</strong> <strong>IN</strong> <strong>HUNGARY</strong><br />

Apart from the 15 taxa found in Hungary, several others have been reported<br />

from parts of Central Europe (BLOM 1996, 1998, BLOM and LÜTH<br />

2002, GRIMS 1999), and might therefore occur in Hungary as well, though<br />

hitherto undetected. Since the highest elevation of present-day Hungary is<br />

1,015 m a.s.l. (RADÓ 1979), the occurrence of high-mountain and alpine<br />

taxa is not to be expected. Taxa that have not yet been shown to occur in<br />

Hungary, but might be expected, should, in our opinion, be included in a<br />

key for naming taxa of Schistidium collected in Hungary. In addition to<br />

those taxa that we have found in this revision, our key therefore includes<br />

the following: S. elegantulum subsp. wilsonii, S. pulchrum, S. rivulare, S.<br />

spinosum, S. trichodon var. nutans, S. trichodon var. trichodon.<br />

Taxa that have been shown to occur in Hungary are printed in<br />

type; taxa not printed in bold might occur in Hungary, but have not yet<br />

been found.<br />

Leaf lamina with papillae<br />

Lamina smooth, but papillae sometimes at leaf margin and dorsal side<br />

of costa<br />

Upper lamina in part bistratose, papillae on both (dorsal and ventral)<br />

sides of lamina; leaves never with red spots; up to 8 stomata per urn;<br />

central strand distinct<br />

Lamina unistratose or rarely with bistratose patches in upper part;<br />

papillae numerous on dorsal side, sparse or missing on ventral side (if<br />

present, then near margin, costa or apex); hair-point fine, often rather<br />

long; lamina occasionally with red spots (absent in plants from shaded<br />

sites); usually more than 8 stomata per urn; central strand absent or indistinct<br />

(< 6 cells)<br />

(siliceous rocks, also on old walls and concrete)<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


76 ERZBERGER, P. and SCHRÖDER, W.<br />

Hair-point coarse, especially well developed in perichaetial leaves;<br />

costa dorsally hardly projecting; mid-leaf cells 6–9 μm wide and<br />

rounded, dorsal and ventral side of lamina with numerous papillae arranged<br />

in rows (examine young leaves!), usually with extended<br />

bistratose patches; perichaetial leaves very wide and differing in form<br />

from stem leaves; central strand of 3–10 cells<br />

(base-rich or siliceous rocks, esp. basalt and porphyric)<br />

Hair-point fine (but mostly straight), costa dorsally prominent;<br />

mid-leaf cells 10–12 μm wide and ± sinuose; papillae on both sides of<br />

lamina, but less numerous on adaxial side; bistratose patches not conspicuous;<br />

perichaetial leaves only slightly wider than stem leaves; central<br />

strand of 20–30 cells<br />

(exposed calcareous rocks, also on old walls and concrete)<br />

Urn length / width ratio 0.8–1.3, shape not oblong or oblong-cylindrical<br />

(but S. brunnescens – 17a – with oblong exothecial cells, small spores,<br />

K+ red and stomata absent sometimes has urns with length / width ratio<br />

< 1.3)<br />

Urn length / width ratio 1.3, shape oblong to oblong-cylindrical<br />

Spores 15–24 μm; hair-point absent on most leaves or very short<br />

(0–0.3 mm); K+ red; stomata absent or present; leaves 0.5–1.3 mm<br />

broad (Rivulare group)<br />

Spores 8–13 μm; hair-point usually present; K+ yellow; stomata present;<br />

leaves 0.3–0.85 mm broad (Confertum group)<br />

Exothecial cells incrassate, isodiametric, stomata present; hair-point<br />

absent; capsule-bearing branches in fascicles of (2–)3–6; leaves<br />

2.1–3.2 × 0.7–1.3 mm, carinate, slightly asymmetric, apex sometimes<br />

boat-shaped, leaf margin in upper half of leaf often dentate by projecting<br />

cells<br />

S. rivulare (siliceous or calcareous rocks in and beside rivers and<br />

streams)<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


<strong>THE</strong> <strong>GENUS</strong> <strong>SCHISTIDIUM</strong> <strong>IN</strong> <strong>HUNGARY</strong> 77<br />

Exothecial cells thin-walled, predominantly oblong; stomata absent; hairpoint<br />

short or absent, 0–0.3 mm, smooth or finely spinulose- denticulate;<br />

capsule-bearing branches not in fascicles; leaves 1.4–2.3 × 0.5–1.0 mm,<br />

obtusely keeled, symmetric, margins entire or irregularly denticulate<br />

immediately below apex<br />

subsp.<br />

(base-rich rocks in or beside<br />

rivers or streams, rarely submerged)<br />

Peristome absent or rudimentary (< 25 μm), stomata 3–6 per urn;<br />

hair-point usually long, finely denticulate; perichaetial leaves plicate;<br />

operculum mamillate; plants small to medium-sized<br />

(siliceous rocks)<br />

Peristome perfect, stomata 3–10 per urn; hair-point short or long,<br />

coarsely spinulose; operculum rostrate, but rostrum sometimes short;<br />

plants small<br />

Hair-point short, 0–0.45 mm, fine, flattened and mostly broadened towards<br />

insertion; peristome teeth strongly and irregularly perforated,<br />

pattern of exothecial cells not very irregular, stomata small, 3–8 per<br />

urn<br />

(exposed siliceous or base-rich rocks)<br />

Hair-point usually long, 0–0.8 mm, coarse, terete and narrow throughout,<br />

not or shortly and narrowly decurrent, in young leaves strongly<br />

spinulose with some very long spines (22–30(–75) μm); peristome<br />

teeth almost entire or narrowly perforated in 1(2) rows, exothecial<br />

cells forming an irregular pattern; stomata 6–8(10) per urn<br />

S. spinosum (exposed siliceous rocks)<br />

Leaf margin or dorsal side of costa in upper half of leaf with papillae or<br />

projecting cells (denticulate)<br />

Leaf margin and dorsal side of costa smooth (few papillae may occur at<br />

leaf apex immediately below the hair-point, in S. dupretii also further<br />

down)<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


78 ERZBERGER, P. and SCHRÖDER, W.<br />

Exothecial cells in central part of urn predominantly oblong, up to<br />

60 μm; peristome teeth 300–450 μm long, in freshly deoperculate capsules<br />

stellate-straight, scarcely twisted, orange; hair-point coarse, of<br />

variable length; urn usually with 0–4(6) stomata at base, but sometimes<br />

more, pores rudimentary or lacking; central strand distinct (> 6 cells);<br />

spores 8–11 μm<br />

(calcareous rocks, often on concrete)<br />

Exothecial cells predominantly isodiametric and transversely elongate;<br />

peristome teeth 300–710 μm long, strongly curved, bent clockwise<br />

and twisted; stomata with distinct pores present; hair-point fine,<br />

of variable length; central strand absent or narrow (< 6 cells); spores<br />

(9)11–15(19) μm<br />

Peristome teeth forming a dome above the urn mouth, (410)450–700 μm<br />

long, very finely and longly pointed, red; columella not falling with the<br />

lid; plants often black, hair-point absent or short (0–0.18 mm)<br />

S. trichodon (moist calcareous rocks)<br />

) urn never cyathiform, length / width ratio 1.6–2.4, plants brownish, never<br />

jet-black<br />

S. trichodon var. nutans<br />

) urn often cyathiform, length / width ratio 1.3–2.1, plants often jet-black<br />

S. trichodon var. trichodon<br />

Peristome teeth reflexed or spreading, 320–710 μm long, their points<br />

may be bent upwards, but never form a dome, red-orange; columella<br />

falling with the lid<br />

Urn 0.7–1.0 mm long and 0.5–0.65 mm wide, exothecial cells quadrate<br />

to transversely rectangular, in regular perpendicular rows, peristome<br />

teeth 320–400 μm; costa strongly papillose on abaxial side in upper<br />

half of leaf, papillae increasing in length towards leaf apex (up to 9–11<br />

μm high), leaf margin strongly and irregularly denticulate to serrate in<br />

upper part of leaf; perichaetial leaves 0.5–0.8 mm wide, small plants<br />

(shaded siliceous, rarely calcareous rocks)<br />

Urn 0.9–1.35 mm long and 0.5–0.85 mm wide, exothecial cells isodiametric,<br />

but pattern less regular; peristome teeth 400–700 μm; leaf margin<br />

finely denticulate or rarely smooth, costal papillae lower; perichaetial<br />

leaves 0.8–1.5 mm wide, medium-sized plants<br />

(calcareous or siliceous substrata)<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


<strong>THE</strong> <strong>GENUS</strong> <strong>SCHISTIDIUM</strong> <strong>IN</strong> <strong>HUNGARY</strong> 79<br />

Exothecial cells in central and lower part of urn predominantly isodiametric<br />

and transversely elongate<br />

Exothecial cells predominantly oblong<br />

Peristome teeth strongly curved, often semi-perforated in lower part<br />

and with small perforations in longitudinal rows in upper part, leaves<br />

mostly falcate to falcato-secund, mostly large plants<br />

(longipilose plants; calcareous or siliceous substrata)<br />

Peristome teeth straight or slightly curved, entire or irregularly perforated<br />

in upper part; leaves usually straight; small to medium-sized<br />

plants<br />

Perichaetial leaves broad, 0.8–1.1(1.25) mm wide (urn not or slightly<br />

exposed in lateral view); hair point structure intermediate between<br />

fine and coarse: rather coarse and stiff, but remnants of cell walls mostly<br />

clearly visible, broad (as broad as chlorophyllose part of the apex), up<br />

to 0.7 mm long, intensely white, urn smooth, plants glossy<br />

S. pulchrum (on siliceous or calcareous rocks in humid sites)<br />

Perichaetial leaves narrow, 0.5–0.6 mm wide (urn much exposed in<br />

lateral view); hair point fine but straight when dry, consisting of few<br />

cells, distinctly narrower than the chloropyllose part of the apex, up to<br />

0.15 (0.25) mm long; urn finely striolate after dehiscence, plants dull,<br />

small, growing in compact cushions<br />

(exposed calcareous, less often siliceous rocks)<br />

Basal marginal cells with thick transverse walls, more or less hyaline;<br />

urn hemispherical to ovate, peristome teeth short (< 340 μm) and<br />

cribrose (i.e. with numerous pits and holes); hair-point mostly fine and<br />

long (except S. brunnescens), flattened at base and composed of cells<br />

with clearly visible lumen<br />

Basal marginal cells usually without thick transverse walls (examine<br />

several leaves), sometimes elongate; urn ovate to oblong, peristome<br />

teeth 220–430 μm; hair-point always coarse, variable in length, terete<br />

or indistinctly flattened at base<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


80 ERZBERGER, P. and SCHRÖDER, W.<br />

Stomata present; plants on siliceous substrate; hair-point flat and fine,<br />

short; exothecial cells in mid-urn 20–42 μm long<br />

(exposed siliceous or base-rich rocks)<br />

Stomata absent; plants of calcareous rocks; hair-point coarse, well developed<br />

in perichaetial leaves, often absent or short in normal leaves;<br />

exothecial cells up to 50–80 μm long, forming a regular pattern<br />

(dry, exposed calcareous rocks)<br />

) Leaves ovate-lanceolate to ovate-triangular, often with shoulders, 1.85–2.6 mm,<br />

usually with longitudinal ridge-like striae on one or both sides of costa; costa<br />

58–90 μm wide in central part of leaf subsp.<br />

) Leaves oblong, ovate or short ovate-triangular, 1.1–2.0 mm; shoulders and longitudinal<br />

ridge-like striae absent; costa 38–60 μm in central part of leaf<br />

subsp.<br />

Urn with 6–10 stomata; leaves acuminate; hair-point usually conspicuous,<br />

0.3–1 mm<br />

Urn with 0–4 stomata; leaves not acuminate; hair-point conspicuous<br />

or less than 0.2 mm<br />

Central strand absent, urn usually ovate in shape, with 6–8(–16) stomata;<br />

exothecial cells with hardly incrassate longitudinal walls; hairpoint<br />

of normal leaves terete at base, not decurrent; upper lamina cells<br />

isodiametric, not sinuose, not distinctly incrassate; lamina with irregular<br />

bistratose patches<br />

(shaded calcareous rocks)<br />

) Hair-point broad, very finely but densely spinulose with only slightly protruding<br />

spinulae (appearing smooth with a hand lens); peristome teeth straight,<br />

patent to squarrose; costa in lower part of leaf 75–88 μm wide, 5–7 stratose;<br />

plants forming tufts; stomata 8–16 per urn S. elegantulum subsp. wilsonii<br />

) Hair-point narrow, distantly spinulose with longer spinulae (visible with a<br />

hand lens); peristome teeth curved, erect to erecto-patent with tips curved inward;<br />

costa in lower part 53–78 μm wide, 4–5 stratose; plants forming mats or<br />

decumbent tufts; stomata 6–8 per urn<br />

subsp.<br />

Central strand always distinct (> 20 cells); urn usually cylindrical in<br />

shape, with 8–10 stomata; exothecial cells with irregularly thickened<br />

longitudinal walls; hair-point usually flattened at base, decurrent; upper<br />

lamina cells sinuose, incrassate, bright yellowish, especially in lower<br />

lamina distinctly incrassate and sinuose; lamina rarely with bistratose<br />

patches<br />

(calcareous rocks)<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


<strong>THE</strong> <strong>GENUS</strong> <strong>SCHISTIDIUM</strong> <strong>IN</strong> <strong>HUNGARY</strong> 81<br />

Plants green, olive or brownish, rarely black, in loose tufts or decumbent;<br />

hair-point often > 0.2 mm, slightly flattened at base and often<br />

decurrent; exothecial cells not forming an irregular pattern, stomata<br />

usually few (0–6)<br />

(calcareous rocks, often on concrete)<br />

Plants usually black, glossy, in compact cushions; hair-point absent or<br />

short (up to 0.2 mm), coarse and coarsely spinulose with short and<br />

broad, patent to squarrose spinulae, terete, not decurrent; exothecial<br />

cells forming an irregular pattern, stomata absent<br />

(= singarense) (calcareous rocks)<br />

FREQUENCY AND RARITY OF TAXA <strong>IN</strong> <strong>HUNGARY</strong><br />

Fig. 34 shows the proportion of each taxon in a total of 448 sites of all<br />

Schistidium specimens examined. The most frequent taxa are: S. crassipilum<br />

(43.5%), S. brunnescens subsp. brunnescens (16.3%), S. apocarpum (14.1%),<br />

S. lancifolium (7.6%), S. elegantulum (7.6%), and S. helveticum (4.0%). The<br />

other taxa are known from less than 8 sites each: S. robustum (7 sites), S. pruinosum<br />

and S. brunnescens subsp. griseum (6 sites each), S. dupretii (4 sites), S.<br />

flaccidum (3 sites), S. confertum (2 sites), S. confusum, S. papillosum and S.<br />

platyphyllum (1 site each).<br />

From a glance at the geological map of Hungary (RADÓ 1979) it is evident<br />

that, apart from large parts of the country (in the lowlands) covered by<br />

quaternary deposits and thus less inviting for colonisation by saxicoles,<br />

there is (in the mountains and hills) a high diversity in both carboniferous<br />

and siliceous rocks, i.e. potential sites for taxa of Schistidium.<br />

Schistidium has been recorded in 30 out of 43 bryogeographical regions<br />

in Hungary (after Boros 1968). This clearly does not reflect the true<br />

distribution, since weedy species like S. crassipilum, which colonise walls<br />

and concrete, are to be expected in all regions. Among the regions without<br />

Schistidium records (Cserehát Hills, Putnok Hills, Karancs–Medves Mts,<br />

Fertõ Hills, Vend Region, Õrség, Hetés, Göcsej, Zselic, Külsõ-Somogy, Little<br />

Hungarian Plain, Nyírség, Dráva Region), there are even some siliceous<br />

mountains (Karancs–Medves Mts). They were not visited by Hungarian<br />

bryologists as frequently as the other mountain areas, since they were<br />

thought to be less interesting and poorer in species (BOROS 1968).<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


82 ERZBERGER, P. and SCHRÖDER, W.<br />

However, for the study of Schistidium distribution in Hungary, these areas<br />

may still hide unexpected treasures.<br />

Species like S. brunnescens, S. crassipilum, S. elegantulum and S. helveticum<br />

with a strong substrate preference for calcareous rocks naturally<br />

show their maximum number of sites in the carboniferous mountains (Aggtelek<br />

Karst, Bükk, Pilis, Buda, Gerecse, Vértes, Bakony, Mecsek, Villány<br />

Mts). On the other hand, among the more frequent species, S. apocarpum<br />

and S. lancifolium, both have most growth sites in the Börzsöny Mts (and<br />

less in the Zemplén, Visegrád, Mátra and Bükk Mts), thus demonstrating a<br />

preference for siliceous substrates. The distribution maps of the less frequent<br />

species give immediate evidence of their respective substrate preferences:<br />

S. robustum, S. brunnescens subsp. griseum, S. confusum and S. dupretii<br />

predominantly grow on calcareous rocks (Bükk, Pilis, Buda, Vértes,<br />

Bakony Mts), whereas S. pruinosum, S. papillosum, S. confertum and S. flaccidum<br />

are found exclusively on siliceous rocks (Zemplén, Bükk, Mátra,<br />

Börzsöny, Visegrád Mts).<br />

Frequency of Schistidium taxa in Hungary<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


<strong>THE</strong> <strong>GENUS</strong> <strong>SCHISTIDIUM</strong> <strong>IN</strong> <strong>HUNGARY</strong> 83<br />

However, these frequency data are not without bias. This becomes obvious<br />

when considering the number of sites in different regions (Table 2): a<br />

large number of collection sites of Schistidium taxa can in fact indicate a<br />

high diversity of growth sites in the region, but it could also just be the consequence<br />

of more thorough bryological collecting. In this context, it is interesting<br />

to regard the two regions with the highest numbers of sites: the<br />

Bükk Mts (62 sites) and the Buda Mts (43 sites). In the case of the Bükk Mts<br />

species number is also highest (12 taxa), therefore this seems to be a centre<br />

of diversity for Schistidium in Hungary. On the other hand, the high number<br />

of collection sites in the surroundings of Budapest, where species<br />

number is only 8, might be indicative of bryological activity concentrated<br />

around the capital. The high diversity of the Bükk Mts is certainly due to<br />

the presence of different geological bedrocks (calcareous as well as siliceous),<br />

but perhaps other factors, e.g. the altitudinal range (up to 900 m), low density<br />

of human settlements and the large area protected as a national park<br />

are also important.<br />

Number of growth sites of Schistidium taxa as recorded on specimen labels in<br />

regions of Hungary with 10 or more sites.<br />

Region (as defined in Boros 1968) No. of sites No. of Schistidium taxa<br />

Bükk Mts 62 12<br />

Buda Mts 43 8<br />

Aggtelek Karst 34 5<br />

Gerecse Mts 34 5<br />

Vértes Mts 33 6<br />

Pilis Mts 33 5<br />

Börzsöny Mts 28 5<br />

Balaton Uplands 24 4<br />

Visegrád Mts 23 5<br />

Bakony Mts 18 4<br />

Zemplén Mts 13 3<br />

Mátra Mts 12 5<br />

Mecsek Mts 12 4<br />

Villány Mts 10 5<br />

As regards rare species, it is important to distinguish between species<br />

that are probably under-recorded and others that are truly rare. We consider<br />

S. platyphyllum and S. papillosum, both with a single growth site<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


84 ERZBERGER, P. and SCHRÖDER, W.<br />

known at present, to be under-recorded. Although a first search along the<br />

banks of the Danube to find more S. platyphyllum was unsuccessful, it is<br />

hardly conceivable that there should be no more potential sites along this<br />

river in Hungary, considering the occurrence of this species along German<br />

lowland rivers. S. papillosum was discovered only recently at its only known<br />

growth site during a search of siliceous substrata for Schistidium. Although<br />

a few excursions were undertaken into such areas (in the Bükk and Börzsöny<br />

Mts), there remain many potentially rewarding places with siliceous<br />

bedrock in these mountains as well as in the Zemplén, Mátra, Karancs–<br />

Medves, Börzsöny and Visegrád Mts to be explored in more detail.<br />

On the other hand, there are reasons to believe that S. confusum, with<br />

only one site, and in particular S. confertum and S. flaccidum, with two and<br />

three sites, respectively, might be truly rare. S. confusum and S. flaccidum<br />

are considered to be rare in Europe, and S. confertum is rare in Fennoscandia,<br />

but more widespread in Central and Southern Europe (BLOM<br />

1996). In Hungary, S. confusum has been discovered only recently in a single<br />

population, in spite of plenty of potential growth sites on calcareous substrate<br />

throughout the country. The species circumscription of S. confertum<br />

and S. flaccidum has been stable within the last hundred years, and was<br />

known to Hungarian bryologists of former times. Their populations have<br />

been detected about fifty (S. confertum) and a hundred (S. flaccidum) years<br />

ago. No new site of either of them was found during fieldwork of the first author,<br />

but a single new location of S. flaccidum has been discovered recently<br />

(B. Papp, unpublished).<br />

The remaining taxa with only few records: S. pruinosum, S. dupretii, S.<br />

robustum, and S. brunnescens subsp. griseum are certainly not frequent, but<br />

may also be under-recorded, since there are two or three recently discovered<br />

sites for each of them.<br />

It is interesting to compare frequency and rarity of Hungarian taxa<br />

with data from other Central European countries, e.g. Austria (GRIMS 1999),<br />

Baden-Württemberg (HOLZ 2000) and Germany (ME<strong>IN</strong>UNGER and<br />

SCHRÖDER 2007). As in Hungary, S. crassipilum and S. apocarpum are frequent<br />

and widely distributed in the above-named countries. Nearly as frequent is<br />

S. elegantulum in Baden-Württemberg, much less so in other parts of Germany,<br />

and in Austria. In Scandinavia, this species has a southwestern distribution<br />

(BLOM 1996), and perhaps some oceanic affinity is reflected in the<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


<strong>THE</strong> <strong>GENUS</strong> <strong>SCHISTIDIUM</strong> <strong>IN</strong> <strong>HUNGARY</strong> 85<br />

fact that it becomes rarer towards continental parts of Europe like Hungary.<br />

It may be significant that most of its Hungarian records are in the<br />

Bükk Mts, the highest among the calcareous mountains, and receiving<br />

most precipitation (RADÓ 1979). On the other hand, S. brunnescens subsp.<br />

brunnescens, one of the most frequent taxa in Hungary, may appear to be<br />

more continental, since records are fewer in Germany and Austria. S.<br />

lancifolium, which in Hungary is among the five most frequent species, is<br />

definitely even more continental; it is not known from Baden-Württemberg<br />

and rare in Germany and Austria. The characterization of its German<br />

and Austrian habitats corresponds well to our observations in Hungary,<br />

and where elevation is given in the Austrian records, it ranges from 800 to<br />

1,700 m a.s.l. S. helveticum, which is not rare in the south-western and central<br />

parts of Germany and in Hungary, appears to be very rare in Austria,<br />

maybe due to scarcity of xerothermic habitats.<br />

For the remaining taxa, Hungarian records are few, but in the light of<br />

data from Germany and Austria, this may in some cases not reflect their<br />

true frequency. S. papillosum, S. robustum and S. dupretii are frequent in<br />

both countries, and we have at present no idea why they appear to be much<br />

rarer in Hungary. S. pruinosum is not infrequent in Baden-Württemberg<br />

and a few other, mainly western parts of Germany, but rare in Austria and<br />

perhaps also in Hungary. The taxa of the Confertum group, S. confertum<br />

and S. flaccidum, which are thought to be truly rare in Hungary, are rare and<br />

red-listed in Baden-Württemberg and Germany (in the highest threat categories,<br />

2 and 1, respectively, of all extant Schistidium taxa in ME<strong>IN</strong>UNGER<br />

and SCHRÖDER 2007); in Austria, however, S. confertum is moderately frequent<br />

in the siliceous parts of the Alps, whereas S. flaccidum is rare to occasional<br />

(H. Köckinger, pers. com.). S. confusum is rare in Germany as well as<br />

in Austria.<br />

CONSERVATION<br />

It seems premature to draw conclusions with respect to threat status<br />

according to the IUCN criteria (IUCN 2001), since much of the data is still<br />

insufficient for this purpose. To improve the state of knowledge, a more<br />

comprehensive field survey of Hungary with special focus on Schistidium<br />

would be desirable. This would probably lead to the discovery of several<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


86 ERZBERGER, P. and SCHRÖDER, W.<br />

new locations, and maybe even new taxa. It would also be necessary to<br />

re-visit the sites of old records and check if the species are still there. Some<br />

future field research should also aim at population dynamics, not only of<br />

rare or less frequent species, but also of species of intermediate frequency<br />

viz. S. elegantulum and S. helveticum, because we do not yet understand,<br />

why they are not much more widespread, given the many additional potential<br />

growth sites in the calcareous parts of Hungary. Thus S. elegantulum<br />

has most of its records in the Bükk Mts, but strikingly few in the other limestone<br />

and dolomite areas, none at all in the Pilis Mts. Does this reflect a<br />

preference for limestone vs. dolomite, or are there climatic reasons, or is it<br />

just an artefact of insufficient mapping? Similarly, it is not clear, why S. helveticum<br />

has not (yet?) been found in the Bakony Mts or the Balaton Uplands.<br />

Many of the Schistidium growth sites mapped during this revision lie<br />

already in protected areas like the Bükk National park, the Aggtelek National<br />

Park and the Duna–Ipoly National Park.<br />

However, since this protected status does not prevent the sometimes<br />

negative consequences to habitat quality of forestry management,<br />

it is important to make the localities of important populations known to<br />

the authorities concerned. In this context, we would like to draw attention<br />

to the sites of S. flaccidum (Bükk Mts, Visegrád Mts) and the two only sites<br />

of S. confertum (Mátra and Börzöny Mts). The status of S. confertum is uncertain.<br />

A short search at the surroundings of Holló-kõ (Börzsöny Mts) by<br />

the first author was unsuccessful; no search has been made at Disznó-kõ<br />

(Mátra Mts) for this species.<br />

It is hoped that this survey of Schistidium in Hungary, where this genus<br />

is well represented, has outlined some of its interesting taxonomic, floristical<br />

and ecological features, and that it will help and stimulate future research.<br />

* * *<br />

Acknowledgements – The authors are grateful to Dr H. H. Blom for examining a critical<br />

specimen, to the curators and directors of the public herbaria and the owners of private<br />

herbaria mentioned in the Introduction for the loan of specimens, to Dr L. Lõkös for the<br />

preparation of maps, to PD Dr H. Kürschner for the opportunity to use a Leitz drawing apparatus,<br />

to R. McF. Craig for correcting the English and to Mag. H. Köckinger for helpful<br />

comments. Special thanks are due to Prof. emer. Dr T. Pócs for his genuine interest in this<br />

work and his active participation in the search for interesting potential growth sites of<br />

Schistidium in the Bükk Mts.<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


<strong>THE</strong> <strong>GENUS</strong> <strong>SCHISTIDIUM</strong> <strong>IN</strong> <strong>HUNGARY</strong> 87<br />

REFERENCES<br />

BLOCKEEL, T. L. and LONG, D. G. (1998): A check-list and census catalogue of British and<br />

Irish bryophytes. – British Bryological Society, Cardiff, 208 pp.<br />

BLOM, H. H. (1996): A revision of the Schistidium apocarpum complex in Norway and<br />

Sweden. – Bryophytorum Bibliotheca : 1–333.<br />

BLOM, H. H. (1998): Schistidium. – In: NYHOLM, E. (ed.): Illustrated flora of Nordic<br />

mosses, Fasc. 4. Nordic Bryological Society, Copenhagen and Lund, pp. 287–330.<br />

BLOM, H. H. and LÜTH, M. (2002): Schistidium spinosum, a new species from Europe and<br />

its relationship to S. liliputanum. – Lindbergia : 122–126.<br />

BLOM, H. H., IGNATOVA, E. A. and AFON<strong>IN</strong>A, O. M. (2006): New records of Schistidium<br />

(Grimmiaceae, Musci) in Russia. – Arctoa : 187–194.<br />

BOROS, Á. (1968): Bryogeographie und Bryoflora Ungarns. – Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest,<br />

466 pp.<br />

BREMER, B. (1980): A taxonomic revision of Schistidium (Grimmiaceae, Bryophyta) 1. –<br />

Lindbergia : 1–16.<br />

CASAS, C., BRUGUÉS, M. and CROS, R. M. (2001): Flora dels briòfits dels Països Catalans. I.<br />

Molses. – Institut d’Estudis Catalans, Barcelona, 278 pp.<br />

CASAS,C.,BRUGUÉS,M.,CROS,R.M.andSÉRGIO, C. (2006): Handbook of mosses of the Iberian<br />

Peninsula and the Balearic Islands. – Institut d’Estudis Catalans, Barcelona, 349 pp.<br />

CASPARI, S. (2004): Moosflora und Moosvegetation auf Gestein im Saar-Nahe-Bergland. –<br />

Diss., Naturw.-Techn. Fakultät, Univ. d. Saarlandes, 414 pp.<br />

CORT<strong>IN</strong>I-PEDROTTI, C. (2001): Flora dei muschi d’Italia. Sphagnopsida, Andreaeopsida,<br />

Bryopsida. Parte I. – Antonio-Delfino Editore, Roma, Milano, 817 pp.<br />

ERZBERGER, P. and PAPP, B. (2004): Annotated checklist of Hungarian bryophytes. –<br />

Studia bot. hung. : 91–149.<br />

GORYUNOV, D. V., IGNATOVA, E. A., IGNATOV, M. S., MILYUT<strong>IN</strong>A, I. A. and TROITSKY,A.<br />

V. (2007): Support from DNA data for a narrow species concept in Schistidium<br />

(Grimmiaceae, Musci). – J. Bryol. : 98–103.<br />

GRIMS, F. (1999): Die Laubmoose Österreichs. Catalogus Florae Austriae. Teil II.<br />

Bryophyten (Moose), Heft 1, Musci (Laubmoose). – Biosystematics and Ecology Series<br />

: 1–418.<br />

HILL, M. O., BELL, N., BRUGGEMAN-NANNENGA, M. A., BRUGUÉS, M., CANO, M. J.,<br />

ENROTH, J., FLATBERG, K. I., FRAHM, J.-P., GALLEGO, M. T., GARILLETI, R., GUERRA,<br />

J., HEDENÄS, L., HOLYOAK, D. T., HYVÖNEN, J., IGNATOV, M. S., LARA, F.,<br />

MAZIMPAKA, V., MUÑOZ, J. and SÖDERSTRÖM, L. (2006): An annotated checklist of<br />

the mosses of Europe and Macaronesia. – J. Bryol. : 198–267.<br />

HOLZ, I. (2000): Schistidium. – In: NEBEL, M. and PHILIPPI, G. (eds): Die Moose<br />

Baden-Württembergs 1, Ulmer, Stuttgart, pp. 379–398.<br />

HOMM, T. (1998): Zum aktuellen Vorkommen einiger ausgewählter epilithischer Moose<br />

(Bryophyta) im Weser-Ems-Gebiet (Nordwestdeutschland). – Drosera :<br />

103–111.<br />

IGNATOV, M. S., AFON<strong>IN</strong>A, O. M. and IGNATOVA, E. A. (2006): Check-list of mosses of<br />

East Europe and North Asia. – Arctoa : 1–130.<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008


88 ERZBERGER, P. and SCHRÖDER, W.<br />

IGNATOVA, E., MAKSIMOV, A., MAXIMOVA, T. and BELK<strong>IN</strong>A, O. (2006): Notes on distribution<br />

of Schistidium species (Grimmiaceae, Bryophyta) in Murmansk Province and<br />

Karelia. – Arctoa : 237–247.<br />

IUCN (2001): IUCN red list categories and criteria. Version 3.1. – International Union for<br />

the Conservation of Nature Species Survival Commission, Gland, Switzerland and<br />

Cambridge, UK.<br />

LOESKE, L. (1930): Monographie der europäischen Grimmiaceen. – Biblioth. Bot. :<br />

1–236.<br />

MAIER, E. (2004): The formation of plicae in capsules of mosses of the order Bryales, with a<br />

focus on the genus Grimmia Hedw. – Candollea : 51–63.<br />

ME<strong>IN</strong>UNGER, L. and SCHRÖDER, W. (2007): Verbreitungsatlas der Moose Deutschlands.<br />

1–3. – Regensburg. Bot. Gesellsch., Regensburg, Vol. 1: 636 pp., Vol. 2: 699 pp., Vol.<br />

3: 709 pp.<br />

MÜLLER, F. (2004): Verbreitungsatlas der Moose Sachsens. – Arbeitsgemeinschaft<br />

sächsischer Botaniker, Dresden, 309 pp.<br />

NIKLFELD, H. (1971): Bericht über die Kartierung der Flora Mitteleuropas. – Taxon :<br />

545–571.<br />

ORBÁN, S. and VAJDA, L. (1983): Magyarország mohaflórájának kézikönyve. (Handbook of<br />

the Hungarian Bryoflora). – Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, 518 pp.<br />

PÉTERFI, M. (1916): Schedae et animadversiones diversae ad Bryophyta regni Hungariae<br />

Exs. – Bot. Múz. Füzetek : 59.<br />

RADÓ, S. (ed.) (1979): Képes politikai és gazdasági világatlasz. – Kartográfiai Vállalat, Budapest,<br />

388 pp.<br />

SCHULZ, F. and DENGLER, J. (eds) (2006): Verbreitungsatlas der Moose in Schleswig-Holstein<br />

und Hamburg. – Landesamt für Natur und Umwelt des Landes Schleswig-Holstein,<br />

Flintbek, 400 pp.<br />

SIEBEL, H. N. (2003): Achterlichtmossen in een nieuw daglicht. – Buxbaumiella : 53–57.<br />

SIEMSEN, M., DOLNIK, C., HAESE, D. and SCHROEDER, W. (2003): Neue Funde gefährdeter<br />

und anderer bemerkenswerter Moose in Schleswig-Holstein und Hamburg. 4. Folge.<br />

– Kieler Notizen Pflanzenkd. Schleswig-Holstein Hamb. : 12–32.<br />

SMITH, A.J.E. (2004): The moss flora of Britain and Ireland. 2nd ed. – University Press,<br />

Cambridge, 1012 pp.<br />

SOTIAUX, A. and VANDERPOORTEN, A. (2001): Check-list of the bryophytes of Belgium. –<br />

Belg. J. Bot. : 97–120.<br />

SZEPESFALVI, J. (1935): Ritka és érdekes lombosmohák új termõhelyei a Pilishegység és Budapest<br />

környékének területérõl. (Neue und seltene Laubmoosfunde aus dem Pilisgebirge<br />

und der Umgebung von Budapest.) – Bot. Közlem. : 154–160.<br />

SZEPESFALVI, J. (1941): Die Moosflora der Umgebung von Budapest und des Pilisgebirges.<br />

II. – Ann. Mus. Nat. Hung. : 1–71.<br />

WEIBULL, H. (2006): Schistidium – blommossor. – In: HALL<strong>IN</strong>GBÄCK, T., LÖNELL, N.,<br />

WEIBULL,H.,HEDENÄS,L.andVON KNORR<strong>IN</strong>G, P. (eds): Nationalnyckeln till Sveriges<br />

flora och fauna. Bladmossor: Sköldmossor – blåmossor. Bryophyta: Buxbaumia –<br />

Leucobryum. ArtDatabanken, SLU, Uppsala, pp. 150–197.<br />

(Received 21 November, 2007)<br />

Studia bot. hung. 39, 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!