23.10.2013 Views

Grouse News 41.pdf - Galliformes-sg.org

Grouse News 41.pdf - Galliformes-sg.org

Grouse News 41.pdf - Galliformes-sg.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GROUSE NEWS<br />

<strong>News</strong>letter of the <strong>Grouse</strong> Group of the<br />

IUCN/SSC-WPA <strong>Galliformes</strong> Specialist Group<br />

<strong>Galliformes</strong> Specialist Group<br />

Issue 41 May 2011


<strong>Grouse</strong> <strong>News</strong> 41 <strong>News</strong>letter of the <strong>Grouse</strong> Group<br />

Contents<br />

From the Editor 3<br />

From the Chair 3<br />

Conservation <strong>News</strong><br />

Urgent measures for conservation of the Cantabrian capercaillie Tetrao urogallus cantabricus in its<br />

habitat in the Cantabrian mountain range<br />

Research Reports<br />

Effects of large-scale human land use on capercaillie Tetrao urogallus (L.) populations in Finland -<br />

A short summary of the PhD Thesis<br />

5<br />

Why the capercaillie population Tetrao urogallus (L.) in the West Carpathians decline? 6<br />

Hazel grouse in open landscapes 13<br />

Investigating the importance of thermal refugia for white-tailed ptarmigan at the southern extent of 22<br />

their range<br />

Is GPS and satellite telemetry an option for grouse research? 24<br />

GPS satellite telemetry used on capercaillie Tetrao urogallus 25<br />

Experiences of satellite tags on rock ptarmigans 26<br />

Book Reviews<br />

Tetraonidae and Phasianidae of the USSR – Ecology and Morphology 28<br />

Conferences<br />

The 12 th International <strong>Grouse</strong> Symposium postponed 1 year 30<br />

Reminder – 29 th Prairie <strong>Grouse</strong> Technical Council (PGTC) Meetings October 4 - 6, 2011 31<br />

6 th European Conference Black <strong>Grouse</strong> Endangered Species. First announcement 31<br />

Recent grouse literature 32<br />

Erratum<br />

Error in the article on black grouse in issue 40 37<br />

Snippets<br />

The effect of climate change on grouse populations in Norway 38<br />

Amazing species required 38<br />

Back Page Picture<br />

Japanese rock ptarmigan<br />

2<br />

4


<strong>Grouse</strong> <strong>News</strong> 41 <strong>News</strong>letter of the <strong>Grouse</strong> Group<br />

From the Editor<br />

First, the disasters of the earthquake, tsunami, and the subsequent nuclear crisis have been troubling news<br />

to the entire world, and we send our condolences to all the citizens of Japan. We wish the best for a rapid<br />

and complete recovery for this fine country and its people. As for the necessary postponement of the 11 th<br />

International <strong>Grouse</strong> Symposium, it is ONLY a conference, and most of us have plenty of other<br />

opportunities to exchange information and ideas. We will most certainly have a dynamite conference in<br />

2012. Thank you, Hiroshi, for the effort put into planning the symposium, and for having to foresight to<br />

know that waiting another year would be best for everyone.<br />

This issue of <strong>Grouse</strong> <strong>News</strong> contains several updates and summaries of recent and ongoing Capercaillie<br />

research, plus additional articles on Hazel <strong>Grouse</strong> and White-tailed Ptarmigan. Additionally, this issue<br />

contains some discussion and early results of using GPS technology for studying grouse. As this<br />

technology continues to improve, we will likely see more wide-scale usage by researchers everywhere,<br />

and regular updates on its applicability from those all that are currently using GPS units would be<br />

beneficial to many other researchers. The proceedings of the 2008 IGS are in the final stages of<br />

completion, and for sure many of our members are currently reviewing the page proofs, so the final<br />

project should be available before our next <strong>Grouse</strong> <strong>News</strong>. And finally, don‟t f<strong>org</strong>et these upcoming<br />

grouse conferences: The 29 th Biennial Prairie <strong>Grouse</strong> Technical Council meeting will be held at Hays<br />

Kansas, USA, 3 October to 6 October 2011 and the XXX th IUGB and Perdix XIII Congress will be held 5<br />

September to 9 September 2011 in Barcelona, Spain. In September 2012 the 6 th European conference on<br />

black grouse will be held in Sweden.<br />

Tor Kristian Spidsö, Editor <strong>Grouse</strong> <strong>News</strong>, TKS.<strong>Grouse</strong>@gmail.com<br />

Don Wolfe, Co-editor North America<br />

G. M. Sutton Avian Research Center, University of Oklahoma, P.O. Box 2007, Bartlesville, OK 74005,<br />

dwolfe@ou.edu<br />

From the Chair<br />

<strong>Grouse</strong> researcher should be familiar with stochastic events and their potentially far-reaching effects on<br />

system dynamics. Yet, we were not well prepared to anticipate circumstances that forced us to derive<br />

from our triennial cycle of gatherings held dear for more than 30 years since the first symposium back in<br />

1978. As you will know by now, due to the earthquake, tsunami, and related nuclear disaster in Japan in<br />

March, there will be no International <strong>Grouse</strong> Symposium in 2011. The decision to postpone the 12 th IGS<br />

in Japan by one year was made in agreement between the local <strong>org</strong>anisers in Japan and the <strong>Grouse</strong><br />

Group‟s committee members. Even as Fukushima appears to be out of the international news by now, it<br />

will take a while until the situation can be considered under control, and an international event such as the<br />

IGS safe to plan and hold.<br />

I am most grateful to our colleague and IGS <strong>org</strong>anizer Hiroshi Nakamura and his team for the work<br />

they have invested so far, and the difficulties they go through, in maintaining their commitment and<br />

dedication to invite the IGS to Japan. We now plan for the IGS to be held in July 2012. All Symposium<br />

plans will be kept, and a new registration process will be started in time. Please spread the information<br />

among your colleagues and students, and advertise for a successful IGS 2012.<br />

Updates of the situation and plans will be posted on the IGS website regularly. I am positive to see<br />

you all in Matsumoto in summer 2012.<br />

Ilse Storch, Chair, <strong>Grouse</strong> Group within the IUCN-SSC/WPA <strong>Galliformes</strong> SG (GSG),<br />

Co-Chair, IUCN-SSC/WPA <strong>Galliformes</strong> SG.<br />

Department of Wildlife Ecology and Management, Institute of Forest Zoology, University of Freiburg, D-<br />

79085 Freiburg, Germany, ilse.storch@wildlife.uni-freiburg.de<br />

3


<strong>Grouse</strong> <strong>News</strong> 41 <strong>News</strong>letter of the <strong>Grouse</strong> Group<br />

CONSERVATION NEWS<br />

Urgent measures for conservation of the Cantabrian capercaillie<br />

Tetrao urogallus cantabricus in its habitat in the Cantabrian mountain<br />

range<br />

Ignacio Torres Ruiz-Huerta<br />

The EU LIFE+ project “Conservation of the Cantabrian capercaillie Tetrao urogallus cantabricus in its<br />

habitat in the Cantabrian Mountain range" began on October 1, 2010. The project main goal is to curb the<br />

drastic decline in this subspecies endemic to the Iberian Peninsula, whose numbers have greatly dwindled<br />

over the last few decades, and to offer a last hope for its recovery. The Cantabrian capercaillie has been<br />

classified by the IUCN as critically endangered, a category analogue to its status in the different Spanish<br />

Regions (Comunidades Autónomas) and in a national level (where it is considered in risk of extinction).<br />

The project is coordinated by the Fundación Biodiversidad, financed 50% by the European<br />

Commission through LIFE+ funds and the Regional governments of Asturias, Cantabria, Castilla y León<br />

(through Fundación Patrimonio Natural de Castilla y León) and Galicia, the National Parks Authority<br />

(depending of Spanish Ministry of Environment, Marine and Rural Affairs) and SEO/BirdLife are<br />

partners and the Fundación Iberdrola is also an important co financer. It will run until September 2014,<br />

with a budget of 7.3 million Euros.<br />

This project coordinates all the different regional governments‟ actions, where several preliminary<br />

actions are being undertaken. The aim is to surpass the pilot activity phase in order to implement a full,<br />

homogenous, cross-cutting project for the entire area where the species is found, combining in-situ<br />

conservation measures (i.e. habitat improvement, control of predators and competitors and non-natural<br />

mortality reduction) with ex-situ activities (breeding in captivity programs and restocking). Civil society<br />

is also involved and the inclusion of a bird conservation NGO, SEO/BirdLife, is a crucial part of this<br />

participation. Private landowners are also included through several tools including the land stewardship,<br />

contributing through innovation to the conservation of the species. Besides, a complete awareness raising<br />

programme to explain the species situation will be developed.<br />

The important degree of rural exodus in the project area (more than 600,000 hectares included in 16<br />

different SPA (Special Protection Areas) brings out the need to maintain the population by generating<br />

more employment in this area, undoubtedly one of the basic objectives of the project which will<br />

contribute to rural development and therefore to the conservation of the species.<br />

In addition, not only significant scientific research will be carried out to ensure the objective success,<br />

but also cooperation with both international and Spanish experts will be ensured in order to come up with<br />

the better proposals for the species survival. We consider the project implementation a priority in Spain<br />

and at a European level in order to prevent the extinction of this emblematic tetraonidae whose current<br />

situation is alarming. The official website of the project is www.lifeurogallo.es.<br />

For further information: Ignacio Torres Ruiz-Huerta. Spanish Ministry of Environment, Marine and<br />

Rural Affairs.<br />

Ignacio Torres Ruiz-Huerta, Director de Estudios y Proyectos. Fundación Biodiversidad, C/ Fortuny 7;<br />

28010 Madrid (Spain). itorres@fundacion-biodiversidad.es.<br />

4


<strong>Grouse</strong> <strong>News</strong> 41 <strong>News</strong>letter of the <strong>Grouse</strong> Group<br />

RESEARCH REPORTS<br />

Effects of large-scale human land use on capercaillie Tetrao urogallus<br />

(L.) populations in Finland - A short summary of the PhD Thesis<br />

Saija Sirkiä<br />

Spatial requirements of capercaillie Tetrao urogallus are known to be impressive: lekking areas require a<br />

minimum of 300 hectares of forest (Wegge & Larsen 1987, Storch 1997, Wegge et al. 2003) and because<br />

of the seasonal changes in habitat use, individual home ranges may cover up to several tens of square<br />

kilometers (Wegge & Rolstad 2002). Thus, the species is often used as a focal species in landscape<br />

ecological studies. In Finland, capercaillie populations have decreased by approximately 40–85%, with<br />

the declines likely to have started in the 1940s (Lindén & Rajala 1981, Lindén 2002). Although the<br />

declines have stabilized from the 1990s onwards, it is obvious that the negative population trend was at<br />

least partly caused by changes in human land use.<br />

The aim of my thesis was to study the connections between human land use and capercaillie<br />

populations in Finland, using several spatial scales. First, I studied the effect of forest age structure on<br />

capercaillie population trends in 18 forestry board districts in Finland during 1965–1988. Second, I<br />

compared the abundances of capercaillie and moose Alces alces (L.) in terms of several land-use variables<br />

on a scale of 50 × 50 km grids and in five regions in Finland. Third, I investigated the effects of forest<br />

cover and fine-grain forest fragmentation on capercaillie lekking area persistence in three study locations<br />

in Finland, on 1000 and 3000 m spatial scales surrounding the leks. The analyses considering lekking<br />

areas were performed with two definitions for forest: > 60 m 3 ha –1 and > 152 m 3 ha –1 of timber volume.<br />

The results showed that patterns and processes at large spatial scales strongly influence capercaillie in<br />

Finland. Positive associations between capercaillie abundance and high forest cover and/or low human<br />

impact were most pronounced in southwestern and eastern Finland, where high proportion of fields and<br />

lakes, respectively, limit the amount of suitable habitats (Sirkiä et al. 2010a). Forest cover (> 60 m 3 ha –1 of<br />

timber) positively affected lekking area persistence only at the larger landscape scale (3000 m radius<br />

surrounding the lekking sites, covering approximately 28 km 2 , Sirkiä et al. in press). According to Wegge<br />

& Rolstad (2002), the annual home range size of an individual capercaillie may cover 30–80 km 2 . If the<br />

males stay in close vicinity of the lekking sites almost throughout the year (Wegge & Larsen 1987), it is<br />

reasonable that our result fits this range.<br />

The effects of older forest classes were hard to assess due to scarcity of older forests in several study<br />

areas. Young and middle-aged forest classes were common in the vicinity of areas with high capercaillie<br />

abundances especially in northern Finland (Sirkiä et al. 2010a). The increase in the amount of younger<br />

forest classes did not provide a good explanation for capercaillie population decline in 1965–1988 (Sirkiä<br />

et al. 2010b). In addition, there was no significant connection between mature forests (> 152 m 3 ha –1 of<br />

timber) and lekking area persistence in Finland (submitted manuscript). It seems that in present-day<br />

Finnish landscapes, area covered with old forest is either too scarce to efficiently explain the abundance<br />

of capercaillie and the persistence of the lekking areas, or the effect of forest age is only important when<br />

considering smaller spatial scales than the ones studied in this thesis. Our findings are supported by other<br />

recent studies considering forest age and capercaillie abundance (e.g. Miettinen et al. 2008) or lekking<br />

sites (e.g. Rolstad et al. 2007). It has also been suggested that habitat quality has been deteriorated in the<br />

older, managed forest stands, especially in northern Finland (Miettinen et al. 2009, 2010).<br />

In conclusion, larger spatial scales should be considered for assessing the future capercaillie<br />

management. According to the proposed multi-level planning the first priority should be to secure the<br />

large, regional-scale forest cover, and the second priority should be to maintain fine-grained,<br />

heterogeneous structure within the separate forest patches. A management unit covering hundreds of<br />

hectares, or even tens or hundreds of square kilometers, should be covered, which requires regional-level<br />

land-use planning and co-operation between forest owners.<br />

References<br />

Lindén, H. (Ed.), 2002. Metsäkanalintututkimuksia: Metsäkanalintukannat. Gummerus Kirjapaino Oy,<br />

Saarijärvi (in Finnish).<br />

Lindén, H., Rajala, P., 1981. Fluctuations and long-term trends in the relative densities of tetraonid<br />

populations in Finland, 1964–77. Finn. Game Res. 39, 13–34.<br />

Miettinen, J., Helle, P., Nikula, A., Niemelä, P., 2008. Large-scale landscape composition and capercaillie<br />

(Tetrao urogallus) density in Finland. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 45, 161–173.<br />

5


<strong>Grouse</strong> <strong>News</strong> 41 <strong>News</strong>letter of the <strong>Grouse</strong> Group<br />

Miettinen, J., Helle, P., Nikula, A., Niemelä, P., 2009. Changes in landscape-scale habitat selection of<br />

capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) in managed north-boreal forest. Silva Fenn. 43, 595–608.<br />

Miettinen, J., Helle, P., Nikula, A., Niemelä, P., 2010. Capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) habitat<br />

characteristics in north-boreal Finland. Silva Fenn. 44, 235–254.<br />

Rolstad, J., Rolstad, E., Wegge, P., 2007. Capercaillie Tetrao urogallus lek formation in young forest.<br />

Wildl. Biol. 13 (suppl. 1), 59–67.<br />

Sirkiä, S., Helle, P., Lindén, H., Nikula, A., Norrdahl, K., Suorsa, P. & Valkeajärvi, P. Persistence of<br />

Capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) lekking areas depends on forest cover and fine-grain fragmentation of<br />

boreal forest landscapes. – Ornis Fenn. in press.<br />

Sirkiä, S., Lindén, A., Helle, P., Nikula, A., Knape, J. & Lindén, H. 2010b. Are the declining trends in<br />

forest grouse populations due to changes in the forest age structure? A case study of Capercaillie in<br />

Finland. – Biol. Conserv. 143, 1540–1548.<br />

Sirkiä, S., Pellikka, J. & Lindén, H. 2010a. Balancing the needs of capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) and<br />

moose (Alces alces) in large-scale human land use. – Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 56, 249–260.<br />

Storch, I., 1997. Male territoriality, female range use, and spatial <strong>org</strong>anization of capercaillie Tetrao<br />

urogallus leks. Wildl. Biol. 3, 149–161.<br />

Wegge, P., Kvål<strong>sg</strong>ard, T., Hjelhord, O., Sivkov, A.V., 2003. Spring spacing behaviour of capercaillie<br />

Tetrao urogallus males does not limit numbers at leks. Wildl. Biol. 9, 283–289.<br />

Wegge, P., Larsen, B.B., 1987. Spacing of adult and subadult male common capercaillie during the<br />

breeding season. Auk 104, 481–490.<br />

Wegge, P., Rolstad, J., 2002. Storfuglen og skogbruket: et sammandrag fra 20 års undersøkelser i Varald<br />

statskog, Hedmark, in: Seminarrapport IBN-SEVU. N<strong>org</strong>es Landbrukshøyskole, Ås, pp. 15–23 (in<br />

Norwegian).<br />

Sirkiä, S. 2010. Effects of large-scale human land use on Capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus L.) populations in<br />

Finland. - Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Helsinki.<br />

Opponent: Professor Tomas Willebrand<br />

Saija Sirkiä, Saija Sirkiä, Department of Biosciences, Viikinkaari 1, P.O. Box 65, FI-00014 University of<br />

Helsinki, Finland, saija.sirkia@gmail.com.<br />

Why the capercaillie population Tetrao urogallus (L.) in the West<br />

Carpathians decline?<br />

Miroslav Saniga<br />

From 1981-2010, population dynamics of capercaillie Tetrao urogallus L. was studied on 43 leks in the<br />

West Carpathians (Slovakia). Nest and chick losses were also studied. Altogether 94 nests, 124 hens with<br />

chicks in June and 132 in the period between 1 st August and 15 th September were checked. Results<br />

demonstrate a marked decrease (>50%) in numbers of cocks and hens on 12 monitored leks (28%) and a<br />

slight decrease (


<strong>Grouse</strong> <strong>News</strong> 41 <strong>News</strong>letter of the <strong>Grouse</strong> Group<br />

LINDÉN, 1989, STORAAS et al. 1999). In terms of landscape ecology this large-scale change in forest<br />

mosaic is expected to have profound effects on spacing pattern and range use of wildlife species,<br />

especially those having home ranges and cruising radii within the critical area interval (ROLSTAD &<br />

WEGGE 1989a). Capercaillie belongs to this area-sensitive category, inhabiting old forest most of the year,<br />

and having seasonal ranges between 10 and 1000 hectares in size (WEGGE and LARSEN, 1987).<br />

In the recent few decades, populations throughout most of Western Europe have declined markedly<br />

(e.g. NOVÁKOVÁ & SŤASTNÝ 1982, KLAUS et al., 1986, KLAUS & BERGMANN 1994, SANIGA 1999). A<br />

decline in capercaillie populations has also been observed during the last 20-30 years in Fennoscandia and<br />

Russia (e.g. RAJALA & LINDÉN 1984, ROLSTAD & WEGGE 1989a).<br />

This paper reports on the findings of a 21-year capercaillie population study in the mountains of<br />

central Slovakia (West Carpathians). This study is aimed at: (a) monitoring population dynamics of the<br />

capercaillie on leks and the surroundings; (b) chick losses during the summer; (c) evaluation of the sex<br />

ratio in the chicks; (d) the relationship between nest and chick losses and predation factors; and (e)<br />

explore reasons for the persistent downward trend in numbers that was documented over the study period.<br />

Material and methods<br />

The field work was conducted in the mountains of central Slovakia 600 m a.s.l. to 1,530 m a.s.l (Veľká<br />

Fatra Mts., Malá Fatra Mts., Kremnické vrchy Mts., Starohorské vrchy Mts., and Nízke Tatry Mts.,<br />

18°50‟ - 19°10‟E; 48°47‟ - 49°19‟N) from 1981-2010. The climate is moderately continental with a mean<br />

temperature of the warmest month (July) of 14.5°C and minus 5.5°C for the coldest (January). Yearly<br />

mean precipation is 1,000 - 1,400 mm, and the ground is usually covered with snow from mid-November<br />

to late March or April (depending on the altitude and exposure).<br />

In the study area mixed forest biocoenoses consisting of the spruce-beech-fir vegetation tier dominate<br />

(90%) (Picea abies (L.), Abies alba Mill., Fagus sylvatica L., Acer pseudoplatanus L.). Coniferous<br />

forests of the spruce vegetation tier constitute around 10% of the study area (Picea abies (L.) dominated,<br />

sprinkled with Acer pseudoplatanus L., Fagus sylvatica L., and Sorbus aucuparia L.).<br />

Capercaillie is difficult to count at throughout the year, but it is practicable to count the number of<br />

cocks displaying on leks in spring (KLAUS et al., 1986). Accuracy of the quantitative investigations<br />

depends on the exact timing of the census. In the initial phase of display activity (late March), cocks do<br />

not visit leks regularly. The period between 20 th April and 10 th May is most suitable for surveys of the<br />

capercaillie in Central Europe (SANIGA, 1998a). In this period, hens also visit the leks regularly.<br />

In 1981-2010, a total of 43 leks were monitored during the spring display season. The study was<br />

largely carried out by observing birds from the vicinity of the leks not to disturb the lek. Observation sites<br />

were usually occupied in the evening before the arrival of the males and were usually left when the<br />

morning display ended. Capercaillie was counted at least twice during the spring display season on the<br />

lek. Leks were censused especially during the period 20 th April to 10 th May (peak of lekking activity). A<br />

possible bias in the material is that data from some leks were not obtained during this peak period. The<br />

number of hens present on the leks is considered underestimated in comparison to cocks, as hens are<br />

much less conspicuous on the leks. Altogether 652 evening and 1088 morning observations were carried<br />

out on the forty-three leks during the spring display season.<br />

Results and discussion<br />

Spring density in natural forests<br />

During 1989-1991, spring density of capercaillie in natural forests varied between 0.5 ind/100 ha in<br />

dwarfed pine stands, 1.4-1.9 ind/100 ha in forests of the spruce vegetation tier, and 2.0-2.7 ind/100 ha in<br />

forests of the spruce-beech-fir vegetation tier. In the period 1999-2001, a dramatic decline in the spring<br />

density was found in the natural forests compared to 1989-1991 with 0.1 ind/100 ha in dwarfed pine<br />

stands, 0.7-1.1 ind/100 ha in forests of the spruce vegetation tier and 0.9-1.3 ind/100 ha in forests of the<br />

spruce-beech-fir vegetation tier. The density estimate for dwarfed pine stands was affected by a<br />

methodological bias due to the proportionately shorter length of transects. In contrast to the situation in<br />

Fennoscandia and Russia, long-term population studies of capercaillie based on censuses of leks during<br />

the display season are scarce in Central Europe (MüLLER, 1974). In Norway, WEGGE (1983) found a<br />

density close to 2.5 ind/100 ha. RAJALA (1974) found the capercaillie density to be 5.98 ind/100 ha in<br />

central Finland. According to Klaus et al. (1986), this density is the upper limit for optimal habitat.<br />

Population dynamics on leks<br />

Results demonstrate a marked decrease (>50%) in numbers of cocks and hens on 12 monitored leks<br />

(28%) and a slight decrease (


<strong>Grouse</strong> <strong>News</strong> 41 <strong>News</strong>letter of the <strong>Grouse</strong> Group<br />

birds per lek was 6.3 cocks and 6.0 hens when the monitoring started in 1981. It declined to 1.5 cocks (r =<br />

0.83, p = 0.001, y = -0.189x + 20.588) and 1.5 hens (r = 0.67, p = 0.001, y = -0.142x + 15.823) per lek in<br />

2010 (Table 1). Findings in this study concerning the numbers of cocks and hens visiting the leks during<br />

the display season agree roughly with KOIVISTO & PIRKOLA (1961), who monitored 185 leks in Finland.<br />

They found 2.3-5.2 cocks and 2.8-3.9 hens per lek.<br />

Table 1. Presence of capercaillie on examined 43 leks during spring display season West Carpathians,<br />

Slovakia, 1981-2010).<br />

Year Checked Individuals Average per lek<br />

leks Males Females Males Females<br />

1981 4 25 24 6.3 6<br />

1982 4 24 27 6 4.3<br />

1983 7 31 27 4.4 3.9<br />

1984 7 31 28 4.4 4<br />

1985 7 23 29 3.3 2.7<br />

1986 6 24 17 4 2.8<br />

1987 8 18 19 2.3 2.4<br />

1988 8 27 17 3.4 2.1<br />

1989 13 40 28 3.1 2.2<br />

1990 23 74 43 3.2 1.9<br />

1991 23 78 52 3.4 2.3<br />

1992 21 68 52 3.2 2.5<br />

1993 23 67 62 2.9 2.7<br />

1994 17 53 55 3.1 3.2<br />

1995 25 71 61 2.8 2.4<br />

1996 22 50 46 2.3 2.1<br />

1997 22 41 46 1.9 2.1<br />

1998 10 21 27 2.1 2.7<br />

1999 10 19 25 1.9 2.5<br />

2000 9 16 22 1.8 2.4<br />

2001 10 17 26 1.7 2.6<br />

2002 62 118 104 1.9 1.7<br />

2003 72 116 128 1.6 1.8<br />

2004 69 124 119 1.8 1.7<br />

2005 79 137 110 1.8 1.4<br />

2006 73 124 108 1.7 1.5<br />

2007 66 112 93 1.7 1.4<br />

2008 73 110 116 1.5 1.6<br />

2009 74 111 108 1.5 1.4<br />

2010 56 84 82 1.5 1.5<br />

Altogether 903 1854 1701 2.1 1.9<br />

Surrounding habitats are expected to influence lek population size in capercaillie (LARSEN & WEGGE<br />

1985). Forest stands 80 years and older with suitable spatial structure covered 20-90% of the area within<br />

1 km of the checked lek centres. On four leks surrounded by forest with only 20-30% old growth, 1-2<br />

cocks displayed. On the contrary, on six leks with 80-90% old growth 5-12 cocks displayed (Table 2).<br />

Comparing the number of cocks on 43 leks with the proportion of old-growth forest (over 80 years old<br />

with suitable spatial structure) within 1 km radius of a lek, a statistically highly significant correlation<br />

between the amount of old-growth forest and the number of cocks attending a lek was found (Pearson<br />

correlation coefficient r = 0.725, p < 0.01). This supports WEGGE & ROLSTAD‟s (1986) findings that leks<br />

surrounded by a high proportion of old-growth forest supported more males than leks in fragmented<br />

areas. On 9 of 11 leks where capercaillie disappeared completely during the study period the surrounding<br />

8


<strong>Grouse</strong> <strong>News</strong> 41 <strong>News</strong>letter of the <strong>Grouse</strong> Group<br />

habitat changed drastically. Presence of old-growth forest with suitable spatial structure within 1 km<br />

radius of a lek declined to less than 20%.<br />

Table 2. Relationship between the amount of old forests (over 80 years old) within a 1 km radius of the<br />

lek centres and the maximum number of cocks attending a lek (West Carpathians, Slovakia, 1981-2010, r<br />

= 0.025, p < 0.01).<br />

Old forest Number of cocks<br />

% 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 12 Sum leks<br />

21-30 3 1<br />

4<br />

31-40 2 2 1<br />

5<br />

41-50 2 2 1<br />

5<br />

51-60<br />

3 1<br />

4<br />

61-70<br />

3 2<br />

5<br />

71-80<br />

4 8 1 1<br />

14<br />

81-90 1 3 1 1 6<br />

Sum leks 7 5 12 11 2 4 1 1 43<br />

When old natural forests are fragmented by clearcuts, the landscape loses qualities which are very<br />

important to this tetraonid. Change of the forest landscape from old-growth forests to clearcuts and<br />

younger stands may increase the number of small rodents. This presumably favours higher densities of<br />

generalist predators (especially marten and fox), which prey on capercaillie eggs and chicks (ROLSTAD &<br />

WEGGE 1989b). Furthermore, the fragmentation of continuous forest habitat and its replacement with<br />

young stands unsuitable for capercaillie disrupts the social <strong>org</strong>anization of capercaillie populations,<br />

particularly the formation of lek communities (KLAUS & BERGMANN 1994).<br />

Chick losses during summer<br />

Between 1 st August and 15 th September, 81 of 131 capercaillie hens had chicks (Table 3). The mean<br />

number of juveniles per hen was 1.9 over the whole study. The average number of chicks accompanying a<br />

hen significantly decreased during the study period (r = 0.77, p = 0.0003, y = -0.409x + 41.155).<br />

Predation pressure on chicks was high in spite of the fact that as breeding season progressed food<br />

offer for predators was continually increasing. Mean clutch size in capercaillie was 6.8 eggs (n = 94). In<br />

nests which were not destroyed or abandoned (n = 37), on average 5.7 chicks hatched. Hens had only 2.4<br />

chicks (n = 124) in June on the average and only 1.9 chicks (n = 131) in the period between 1st August<br />

and 15th September.<br />

Nest losses in capercaillie depend on many factors as habitat type, vegetation cover, timing of the egglaying,<br />

egg colour, nest localization and weather conditions (MüLLER 1984). Predation pressure on<br />

capercaillie chick show regional differences, but also depends on season and other factors (KLAUS et al.,<br />

1986). Uncamouflaged nest is with high probability detected and robbed by corvid birds (raven, jay). On<br />

the contrary, mammalian predators use much scent, thus nest camouflage does not play a significant role.<br />

Sex ratio in the chicks<br />

Of all broods observed in the mountains of central Slovakia in the period between 1 st August and 15 th<br />

September, 96 were counted reliably. Chick number varied between 2 and 6. Broods of 3 were most<br />

frequently found, making up more than 1/3 of all broods seen. The mean brood size was 2.2. Broods were<br />

significantly larger in the beginning of the decline than later (Table 3).<br />

Only 53 broods totalling 171 chicks were reliably sexed. They consisted of 69 males and 102 females.<br />

Female chicks were consistently outnumbering male chicks. The deviation from 1:1 ratio was in each<br />

case significant at ten percent probability or smaller when tested by 2 using YATE‟s correction ( 2 =<br />

12.41, p< 0.001). The sex ratio was clearly related to the size of the brood. In 13 2-chick broods, 7<br />

consisted only of females, in 5 there was one of each sex and in one only males. In both cases the<br />

deviation from a 1:1 ratio was statistically significant. The difference seemed to even out as broods<br />

become larger, but the pattern was inconsistent. Table 4 illustrates the predominance of female chicks and<br />

how the sex ratio is related to the size of brood. There was a remarkable increase in the proportion of<br />

female chicks when brood size decreased from three to two. When comparing the sex composition<br />

between successively larger broods, there were no statistical difference between sizes three, four, five,<br />

9


<strong>Grouse</strong> <strong>News</strong> 41 <strong>News</strong>letter of the <strong>Grouse</strong> Group<br />

and six, whereas the difference between two and three was significant at ten percent probability (t = 2,25,<br />

p < 0.10, 31 df, one-tailed t-test). Brood sizes one and two had significantly fewer males than did any<br />

other brood size.<br />

Table 3. Observations of capercaillie hens with chicks between 1 st August and 15 th September (West<br />

Carpathians, Slovakia, 1983-2010, n =132).<br />

Number of chicks<br />

Year 0 2 3 4 5 Total Average per hen<br />

1983<br />

1 1 1 3 4<br />

1984<br />

1<br />

1<br />

2 4<br />

1986<br />

1 2 1 4 4<br />

1987<br />

1 1<br />

1 3 3.3<br />

1989<br />

2 3<br />

5 3.6<br />

1990<br />

2 2 2<br />

6 2.7<br />

1991 2 3 3<br />

8 1.9<br />

1992 3<br />

2 2<br />

7 2<br />

1993 2 1 2<br />

5 1.6<br />

1994<br />

1 1<br />

2 3.5<br />

1995 3<br />

2 2<br />

7 2<br />

1996 3<br />

2 2<br />

7 2<br />

1997 4 2 2 1<br />

9 1.6<br />

1998 3<br />

1 2<br />

6 1.8<br />

1999 4<br />

1 2<br />

7 1.6<br />

2000 2 3 2<br />

7 1.7<br />

2001 3<br />

2 2<br />

7 2<br />

2002 1 2<br />

3 1.9<br />

2003 3<br />

1<br />

4 1.6<br />

2004 2 2<br />

4 1.6<br />

2005 2 2<br />

4 1.9<br />

2006 3<br />

1<br />

4 2<br />

2007 3<br />

1 1<br />

5 2<br />

2008 2 1 1<br />

4 1.9<br />

2009 3<br />

1<br />

4 1.2<br />

2010 3 1 4 0.8<br />

Total 51 20 32 25 3 131 1.9<br />

Table 4. Composition of capercaillie broods sampled between 1 st August and 15 th September (West<br />

Carpathians, Slovakia, 1983-2010, n = 53).<br />

Proportion<br />

Brood size n males females M/F % males % females<br />

2 13 0.54 1.46 0.37 26.9 73.1<br />

3 20 1.2 1.8 0.67 40 60<br />

4 16 1.75 2.25 0.78 43.7 56.3<br />

5 3 2.33 2.67 0.88 46.7 53.3<br />

6 1 3 3 1 50 50<br />

Altogether 53 1.3 1.92 0.68 40.4 59.6<br />

10


<strong>Grouse</strong> <strong>News</strong> 41 <strong>News</strong>letter of the <strong>Grouse</strong> Group<br />

Predators influencing the capercaillie populations<br />

Predation appears to be of major importance in limiting numbers of birds, including capercaillie. Out of<br />

75 capercaillie clutches 49 (65%) were destroyed. Main mammalian egg predators of the capercaillie<br />

were found pine marten Martes martes (L.), stone marten Martes foina (Erxl.), mustelids Mustela sp. and<br />

red fox Vulpes vulpes (L.) (altogether 18%), wild boar Sus scrofa (L.) (6%) and brown bear Ursus arctos<br />

(L.) (4%). According to KLAUS (1984), predation of wild boar on capercaillie nests can locally reach<br />

30%. Main avian egg predators were corvid birds, particularly jay Garrulus glandarius (L.) and raven<br />

Corvus corax (L.) (altogether 18%).<br />

In the years with very cold weather during May (heavy snowfall), nests were destroyed by snow cover<br />

and abandoned (21%). Four clutches (8%) were found abandoned, the hens were probably predated by<br />

goshawk Accipiter gentilis (L.), golden eagle Aquila chrysaetos (L.) and ural owl (Strix uralensis Pall.),<br />

or by some of the mammalian predators - lynx Lynx lynx (L.) in 12 destroyed and abandoned nests (25%)<br />

the reason was unknown.<br />

Predation pressure on capercaillie nests decreased significantly during the incubation period (74% nest<br />

losses during the first half of May, n = 49; 54% in the second half of May, n = 35). A decrease in nest<br />

losses during the incubation period was expected because at the start of the capercaillie egg-laying no<br />

other bird species except birds of prey and owls are nesting. Capercaillie nests quite early in the spring<br />

prior to the onset of breeding of most sedentary and migratory birds. Thus the predation pressure on this<br />

forest-dwelling grouse is much higher in the first half of May than later when 53-59 bird species breed<br />

(SANIGA 1994, 1995a, 1995b). A second factor is that nests placed on the ground at the beginning of May<br />

may be too exposed to predators until the vegetation has adequately developed (FULLER 1995). Thus the<br />

predations pressure on the early breeding birds is expected to be much higher than later as the breeding<br />

season progresses.<br />

Fences, wires and disturbances<br />

Of 23 perished adult capercaillie, hitting fences was a common cause of death to 11 (48%). Fences used<br />

in mature forests where browsing by deer is preventing the growth and development of natural<br />

regeneration does present a considerable hazard to capercaillie, especially when a fence runs through a<br />

forest. Two capercaillie were found to be killed on cables of ski-lifts.<br />

Enthusiastic gamekeepers and birdwatchers anxious to view a lek were harmful to capercaillie display.<br />

Similarly forest management during the display season caused continued disturbance and had a<br />

deleterious effect on lek capercaillie populations. Tourism is a significant limiting factor in most<br />

capercaillie habitats in Central Europe (KLAUS & BERGMANN, 1994).<br />

Conclusion<br />

Several factors have contributed to the dramatic recent decline in capercaillie population in the mountains<br />

of the West Carpathians. Habitat deterioration has probably played a main role. The correlation between<br />

the amount of old forest and the number of cocks attending a lek has been significant. The presence of<br />

older trees has appeared to be important for capercaillie in West Carpathians, as elsewhere. Other factors<br />

have also contributed to the rapid decline. The recent decline in numbers has also been associated with an<br />

increase in rainfall and snowfall in early June. The number of rain- and snow-days in this crucial period,<br />

when most of the chicks hatch, has been inversely associated with capercaillie breeding success.<br />

Deteriorating climatic conditions for capercaillie could override any improvements in habitat quality<br />

(MOSS & PICOZZI 1994). Predation has appeared to be of major importance in limiting numbers of<br />

capercaillie populations. Fences have also been an important cause of capercaillie mortality. Continued<br />

disturbance caused by gamekeepers, enthusiastic birdwatchers and forest managers also has had a<br />

deleterious effect on capercaillie lek populations. The future of capercaillie populations in the West<br />

Carpathians will depend on the way in which the forest resources will be used and also on the effects of<br />

air pollution on forest health, ground vegetation and the abundance of insects available to chicks during<br />

the first weeks of their life (PORKERT 1991). Habitat improvement via forest management practices<br />

should be the most successful way to save the species.<br />

Acknowledgement<br />

This contribution/publication is the result of the project implementation: Centre of Excellence „Adaptive<br />

Forest Ecosystems“, ITMS: 26220120006, supported by the Research & Development Operational<br />

Programme funded by the ERDF.<br />

References<br />

FULLER, R.J. 1995. Bird life of woodland and forest. - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 244 p.<br />

11


<strong>Grouse</strong> <strong>News</strong> 41 <strong>News</strong>letter of the <strong>Grouse</strong> Group<br />

HELLE, P. 1985. Effects of forest fragmentation on bird densities in northern boreal forests. - Ornis<br />

Fennica 62: 35-41.<br />

KLAUS, S. 1984. Predation among capercaillie in a reserve in Thuringia. - In LOVEL, T. AND HUDSON, P.<br />

(eds). - International <strong>Grouse</strong> Symposium 3: 334-346.<br />

KLAUS, S. & BERGMANN, H.H. 1994. Distribution, status and limiting factors of capercaillie (Tetrao<br />

urogallus) in central Europe, particularly in Germany, including an evaluation of reintroductions.-<br />

Gibier Faune Sauvage, Game Wildl., 11: 57-80.<br />

KLAUS, S., BERGMANN, H.H., ANDREEV, A.V., MÜLLER, F., PORKERT, J. & WIESNER, J. (eds) 1986. - Die<br />

Auerhühner. Wittenberg-Lutherstadt: Ziemsen Verlag. 276 p.<br />

KOIVISTO, I. & PIRKOLA, M. 1961. Behaviour and number of the capercaillies and black grouses on leks. -<br />

Suomen Riista 14: 53-64.<br />

LARSEN, B.B. & WEGGE, P. 1985. Habitat characteristics of territorial capercaillie cocks during the<br />

breeding season. In LOVEL, T. AND HUDSON, P. (eds). - International <strong>Grouse</strong> Symposium 3: 236-246.<br />

LINDÉN, H. 1984. Changes in Finnish tetraonid populations and some factors influencing mortality. -<br />

Finnish Game Research 39: 3-11.<br />

LINDÉN, H. 1989. Characteristics of tetraonid cycles in Finland.- Finnish Game Research 46: 34-42.<br />

MOSS, R. & PICOZZI, N. 1994. Management of Forests for Capercaillie in Scotland. - Bulletin HMSO 113:<br />

1-32.<br />

MÜLLER, F. 1974. Hahn in Ruh. - Pirsch 26: 50-52.<br />

MÜLLER, F. 1984. The loss of capercaillie clutches - an evaluation of a ten year study on simulated nests<br />

in the western Rhön mountains. In LOVEL, T. AND HUDSON, P. (eds). - International <strong>Grouse</strong><br />

Symposium 3: 347-353.<br />

NOVÁKOVÁ, E. & ŠŤASTNÝ, K. 1982. Bestand und Bestandsentwicklung des Auerhuhns in Böhmen und<br />

Mähren. In KEMPF, C. (ed.). Actes Coll. Int. Grand Tetras: 35-42.<br />

PORKERT, J. 1991. Nebelfrost als das Aussterben von Tetraoniden förderner Faktor in den Ostsudeten.<br />

Acta ornithoecol. 2: 195-209.<br />

RAJALA, P. 1974. The structure and reproduction of Finnish populations of Capercaillie, Tetrao urogallus,<br />

and Black <strong>Grouse</strong>, Lyrurus tetrix, on the basis of later summer census data from 1963-66. - Finnish<br />

Game Research 35: 1-51.<br />

RAJALA, P. & LINDÉN, H. 1984. Finnish tetraonid populations in 1982-83 according to the August routecensuses.<br />

- Suomen Riista, 31: 92-99.<br />

ROLSTAD, J. 1986. Effects of logging on capercaillie Tetrao urogallus leks. II. Cutting experiments in<br />

south-eastern Norway. - Scandinavian Journal Forest Research 4: 99-109.<br />

ROLSTAD, J. & WEGGE, P. 1987. Habitat characteristics of Capercaillie Tetrao urogallus display grounds<br />

in southeastern Norway. - Holarctic Ecology 10: 219-229.<br />

ROLSTAD, J. & WEGGE, P. 1989a. Capercaillie Tetrao urogallus populations and modern forestry - a case<br />

for landscape ecological studies. - Finnish Game Research 46: 43-52.<br />

ROLSTAD, J. & WEGGE, P. 1989b. Effects of logging on capercaillie Tetrao urogallus leks. III. Extinction<br />

and Recolonization of Lek Populations in Relation to Clearfelling and Fragmentation of Old Forest. -<br />

Scandinavian Journal Forest Research 4:129-135.<br />

SANIGA, M. 1994. Bird community of the forests of the spruce-beech-fir vegetation tier in the Veľká and<br />

Malá Fatra mountains. - Biológia, Bratislava, 49: 787-794.<br />

SANIGA, M. 1995a. Breeding bird communities of the fir-beech to the dwarfed-pine vegetation tiers in the<br />

Veľká and Malá Fatra mountains. - Biológia, Bratislava, 50: 185-193.<br />

SANIGA, M. 1995b. Seasonal dynamics of the bird assemblages in the natural forests of the spruce<br />

vegetation tier. - Folia Zool., 44: 103-110.<br />

SANIGA, M. 1996a. Habitat characteristics of Capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) leks in central Slovakia. -<br />

Biológia, Bratislava, 51: 191-199.<br />

SANIGA, M. 1996b. Distribution, habitat preferences and breeding biology of the Capercaillie (Tetrao<br />

urogallus) population in the Veľká Fatra mountains (West Carpathians). - Biológia, Bratislava, 51:<br />

201-211.<br />

SANIGA, M. 1996c. Population study of Capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) in the Ľubochňa valley (Veľká<br />

Fatra mts., Slovakia). - Folia Zool., 45: 17-29.<br />

SANIGA, M. 1998a. Daily activity rhythm of capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus). - Folia Zool., 47: 161-172.<br />

SANIGA, M. 1998b. Quantitative-qualitative damage of the woody plants by the mammals and birds in the<br />

plantings and natural seedings. - Forest. Jour., 44: 101-109 (in Slovak, with a summary in English).<br />

SANIGA, M. 1999. Population dynamics of Capercaillie Tetrao urogallus on leks in Central Slovakia in the<br />

perid 1981-1997. - Vogelwelt 120, Suppl.: 235-240.<br />

STORAAS, T., KASTDALEN, L. & WEGGE, P. 1999. Detection of forest grouse by mammalian predators: A<br />

possible explanation for high brood losses in fragmented landscapes. - Wildlife Biology 5: 187-192.<br />

12


<strong>Grouse</strong> <strong>News</strong> 41 <strong>News</strong>letter of the <strong>Grouse</strong> Group<br />

VÄISANEN, R.A., JARVINEN, O. & RAUHALA, P. 1986. How are extensive, human-caused alterations<br />

expressed on the scale of local bird populations in boreal forests? - Ornis Scandinavica 17: 282-292.<br />

WEGGE, P. & ROLSTAD, J. 1986. Size and spacing of capercaillie leks in relation to social behaviour and<br />

habitat. - Behavioural Ecology Sociobiology 19: 401-408.<br />

WEGGE, P. & STORAAS, T. 1990. Nest loss in capercaillie and black grouse in relation to the small rodent<br />

cycle in southeast Norway. - Oecologia 82: 527-530.<br />

Miroslav Saniga, Institute of Forest Ecology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Research station, SK-976 02<br />

Staré Hory, Slovakia, uelsav@bb.sanet.sk.<br />

Hazel grouse in open landscapes<br />

Marc Montadert & Siegfried Klaus<br />

Introduction<br />

The hazel grouse is a forest-dwelling species rarely seen outside of forests and is reported to be a poor<br />

disperser (Swenson 1991). Therefore, forest fragmentation has a potentially strong negative impact on<br />

individual behaviour and population dynamics. At the population level, studies of hazel grouse<br />

occurrence in forest fragments scattered in agricultural landscapes have shown that birds do not inhabit<br />

forest patches isolated by an open gap of 100 m in south-central Sweden (Aberg et al. 1995) and 200-250<br />

m wide along the northern border of the Bohemian Forest (Sewitz & Klaus 1997; Klaus & Sewit 2000).<br />

Landscape structure could also impede range expansion in mountainous regions. In the south-eastern<br />

French Alps, the recolonisation front is blocked by open alpine meadows and rocky ridges acting as<br />

barriers to hazel grouse dispersal (Montadert & Léonard 2006). Telemetry studies suggested that the<br />

impact of forest fragmentation on hazel grouse distribution could be mainly explained by an unusual<br />

juvenile dispersal pattern where males moved further than females (Montadert & Leonard in press)<br />

In numerous regions, viable populations of hazel grouse are living in heterogeneous landscapes where<br />

forests were fragmented by human activity centuries ago (Fang & Sun 1997; Klaus & Sewit 2000; Sun et<br />

al. 2003). In such areas the local decline of traditional agriculture and forest exploitation can lead to the<br />

development of habitat favourable to hazel grouse in the form of young forest stages and habitat edges<br />

with deciduous trees and shrubs, if natural forest succession is allowed on former fields and logged sites.<br />

An example is the habitat that develops on meadows abandoned in the Bohemian Forest (Klaus 1995).<br />

In this paper, we want to use observations of hazel grouse in non-forest or edge habitats to shed light<br />

on three questions:<br />

- Is the male-biased juvenile dispersal in hazel grouse that is suggested by telemetry confirmed by<br />

anecdotal observations of hazel grouse outside of forests?<br />

- To what extent do open alpine ridges constitute definite barriers to hazel grouse dispersal?<br />

- To what extent are edge and corridor structures in agricultural landscapes used by hazel grouse<br />

and are they incorporated by settled individuals into their regular home ranges?<br />

Study area and Methods<br />

Hazel grouse outside of forests.<br />

Using an informal network of ornithologists and "grousers" in France, Switzerland and Germany, we<br />

collected observations of hazel grouse in unusual habitats by requesting the following information: sex,<br />

age, date, habitat type and distance from nearest forest.<br />

Hazel grouse using edge and corridors.<br />

We used personal data collected in two study sites: Auzet in the south-eastern French Alps and Sumava<br />

mountains in Czechia.<br />

Auzet.<br />

The Auzet study site is located in a mountainous landscape at 1,200-1,700 m a.s.l. and 76% of the area is<br />

forested. About half of the forest consists of old stands of fir Abies alba or beech Fagus sylvatica, the<br />

remainder being young coniferous stands originating from natural reforestation/succession on either clearcuts<br />

made 40-50 years ago or on abandoned pastures. Deciduous trees providing food were unequally<br />

distributed over the study area, from very abundant and diversified in mixed-stands to very few in young<br />

pine-spruce forests on poor soils (see Montadert & Léonard (2003) for more detailed description of study<br />

area). Winter feeding behaviour of hazel grouse appeared highly opportunistic in this area, depending on<br />

local resource availability. In rich stands, birds selected catkins/buds of hazel Corylus avellana, birch<br />

Betula pendula, beech, and rowan Sorbus aucuparia, whereas in poor stands, hazel grouse fed on all<br />

13


<strong>Grouse</strong> <strong>News</strong> 41 <strong>News</strong>letter of the <strong>Grouse</strong> Group<br />

available deciduous trees, but leaves of bearberry Arctostaphyllos uva-ursi represented the staple food<br />

(unpublished data).<br />

At Auzet, use of edge and corridors by hazel grouse was studied by radio-tracking of one male from<br />

24 April to 24 December 2000, (N=64 fixes) and one female from 8 October 2004 to 22 June 2006<br />

(N=198 fixes). The male was captured in spring in his first-year and he settled in a forest fragmented by<br />

pastures, close to human settlements (Figure 3). The female was 2 months-old when captured. Only fixes<br />

obtained after her natal dispersal ended (9 October) were used for the analysis of edge selection. Her adult<br />

home range was implanted around a clearing grazed by cattle in a largely forested area (Figures 4 & 5).<br />

Annual and seasonal home ranges were defined by the Minimum Convex Polygon method. To check<br />

for habitat selection in relation to distance to edge, we divided the annual home range into three areas<br />

representing different distances to pasture edges: 20 m (edge habitat), 20 to 100 m and 100 m (interior<br />

habitat) and calculated the relative proportion of each area. These relative proportions represented the<br />

availability of each habitat. Radio-fixes were classified according to their location in one of the three<br />

areas.<br />

The selection of edge was studied using the selection ratio (Wi) and the difference with random use of<br />

habitat. We tested this difference with a Log-likelihood ratio test (LR) (Manly et al. 2002). Analyses were<br />

implemented using "AdeHabitat" library in R (Calenge 2006).<br />

Sumava Mountains (Bohemian Forest)<br />

Sewitz & Klaus (1997) recorded within a 10-m circle around observations of grouse the altitude (600-<br />

1,300 m a.s.l.), exposition, tree species composition, number of stems and cover (ground vegetation,<br />

shrub layer, tree layer). Four main classes of habitats were defined in the study area depending on the<br />

altitude: 1) valleys with alder as the dominant deciduous food tree (about 500-700 m a.s.l.), 2) lower<br />

slopes with birch and hazel as the dominant potential winter food (about 700-900 m a.s.l.), 3) mountain<br />

mixed forests with spruce, beech and fir where beech buds are the main winter food as indicated by<br />

qualitative fecal analysis (900-1,100 m a.s.l.), and 4) the natural mountain spruce forests where rowan is<br />

the principal food in winter when the snow is deep and bilberry shoots are no longer available (1,100 – 1,<br />

300 m a.s.l.). The main winter foods of hazel grouse in this area were primarily buds and catkins of these<br />

five species (Kucera, Kämpfer-Lauenstein, Lieser pers. comm. and own unpublished observations).<br />

Results<br />

Hazel grouse in open landscapes outside forests<br />

Between 1951 and 2009, we obtained 32 observations of hazel grouse leaving closed forests in France,<br />

Switzerland and Czech Republic: 21 males, 7 females and 4 unsexed specimens (Table 1). Age was<br />

known for 6 of the 32 birds among which 5 were classified as juveniles. Age was determined from<br />

prepared museum specimens or dead individuals using criteria of first and ninth primaries (Bonczar &<br />

Swenson 1992, Montadert & Leonard 2009).<br />

Of the 32 observations, 56% were individuals found dead, often killed by collision with human<br />

infrastructures: window (n=9) or electric wire (n=1). One was found dead in a hen house next to a farm,<br />

one killed by a predator. The other 44% were direct sightings or birds captured alive and released (one<br />

was radio-equipped and monitored during 7 months, 4 were captured in bird nets at Cou-Bretolet ringing<br />

station).<br />

Twenty-one of the hazel grouse were observed in hamlets, villages or even in cities. Six birds were<br />

noticed in open sub-alpine or alpine habitat. The highest recorded elevations were 2,200 and 2,460 m.<br />

Other observations involved birds in agricultural areas or marsh not far from forest.<br />

Observations were concentrated in autumn (18 out of 28), spring (n=9) and winter (n=2). Females<br />

were observed only in autumn (median date: 21 September, min-max: 16/08 – 14/10, n=6). Males were<br />

observed equally in autumn (median date: 25 September, min-max: 12/09 – 27/10, n=8) and spring<br />

(median date: 4 April, min-max: 20/03 – 23/05, n=9). Two were contacted in February (1 and 22).<br />

14


<strong>Grouse</strong> <strong>News</strong> 41 <strong>News</strong>letter of the <strong>Grouse</strong> Group<br />

Table 1. Observations of hazel grouse outside of closed forest.<br />

Date Sex Age Habitat<br />

Distance to<br />

forest<br />

Location Commune Country Observer Comments<br />

sixties ? ? city ?<br />

1.8 km from next<br />

University of<br />

science<br />

Besançon<br />

(Doubs)<br />

France Cretin JY killed by collision with window<br />

23/11/2008 ? ? city<br />

forest but 20 km<br />

from closest<br />

known inhabited<br />

territories<br />

in a small<br />

garden<br />

Payerne Switzerland Henrioux P<br />

direct sighting in a small garden in<br />

residential area<br />

in residential Sala<br />

Swiss killed by collision with a window at<br />

20/10/2008 ? ? city 100-500 m area with Capriasca Switzerland Ornithological 3 km from closest known<br />

thickets (Tessin)<br />

Station territories<br />

open agriculture<br />

hedgerow<br />

20/09/1995 ? ? landscape with 100 m connected to Ancelle (05) France B<strong>org</strong> flushed out in a hedgerow<br />

scattered woods<br />

little wood<br />

17/09/1990 female ? city ? martigny school Martigny Switzerland Keim C. killed by collision with window<br />

1921 female ? city 1 km Zool. Garten Basel Switzerland<br />

in Blattner<br />

(1995)<br />

found dead conserved at National<br />

Museum<br />

16/08/1994 female ? subalpine moor 50-100 m in the pass<br />

Bretolet<br />

pass(valais) Switzerland<br />

Swiss<br />

Ornithological<br />

Station<br />

ringing data. not far from open<br />

forest and alder moor<br />

10/10/2008 female ? subalpine moor 50-100 m in the pass<br />

Bretolet pass<br />

Switzerland<br />

(valais)<br />

Swiss<br />

Ornithological<br />

Station<br />

ringing data. not far from open<br />

forest<br />

14/09/2006 female juvenile village 1-1.5 km in the village Bramois Switzerland Arlettaz R<br />

killed by collision with window.<br />

preserved in St Maurice college<br />

14/10/2007 female ? village 55 m in the village Ardon (Jura) France<br />

hunting<br />

association of<br />

Jura<br />

Found dead without apparent<br />

cause in fenced garden<br />

25/09/2002 female ?<br />

village in plain<br />

area<br />

50-100 m in the village<br />

Bad Ragaz<br />

(St Gal)<br />

Switzerland<br />

Swiss<br />

Ornithological<br />

Station<br />

killed by a collision with a window<br />

of a city building. known territories<br />

higher up 500-1000m hight. forest<br />

close to the village<br />

10/10/2009 male ?<br />

alpine rocky<br />

meadow<br />

1 km<br />

top of Piolit peak<br />

Ancelle (05)<br />

(2460 m alt)<br />

France Itier. G<br />

seen alive at the top of the<br />

mountain. See picture Fig. 1<br />

23/03/1984 male ? city 1.25 km in the city<br />

Solothurn<br />

(SO)<br />

Switzerland<br />

in Blattner<br />

(1995)<br />

found dead conserved at National<br />

Museum<br />

20/03/2003 male ?<br />

forest edge.<br />

agriculture area<br />

and village at<br />

615 m<br />

50 m?<br />

Steffisburg<br />

(Berne)<br />

Switzerland<br />

Swiss<br />

Ornithological<br />

Station<br />

killed found in forest edge at 4-<br />

5km from known territories. not far<br />

from Aar valley<br />

08-09 1990-91 male ?<br />

isolated farm in<br />

agriculture area<br />

> 500 m<br />

Faucogney<br />

(70)<br />

France Mattieu B.<br />

found dead in a hen house of a<br />

farm surrounded by open<br />

agricultural landscape<br />

02/05/2004 male ? marsh<br />

1 km but small<br />

thicket at 200m<br />

belts of<br />

Neuchatel lake<br />

Coffrane Switzerland Sinz C<br />

direct sighting in reeds of a marsh<br />

with scattered willows<br />

04/05/2008 male<br />

snow in alpine<br />

juvenile<br />

meadow<br />

2-3 km<br />

Grimsel<br />

mountain. (2200<br />

m alt)<br />

Guttannen Switzerland Stigler M.<br />

found dead lying on the snow.<br />

See pictures Fig. 2<br />

27/10/2001 male<br />

open clearing in<br />

juvenile<br />

a forest<br />

10-50 m Ardon Switzerland Monney JC<br />

killed by collision with window of a<br />

isolated building in the opening<br />

16/09/1971 male adult subalpine moor 50-100 m in the pass<br />

Bretolet<br />

pass(valais) Switzerland<br />

Swiss<br />

Ornithological<br />

Station<br />

ringing data. not far from open<br />

forest and alder moor<br />

12/09/2004 male ? subalpine moor 50-100 m in the pass<br />

Bretolet pass<br />

Switzerland<br />

(valais)<br />

Swiss<br />

Ornithological<br />

Station<br />

ringing data. not far from open<br />

forest and alder moor<br />

captured alive in a cellar injured<br />

03/04/1951 male ? village ? in the village Autumn France Combe J (de la) by a phone wire during an<br />

overnight storm<br />

freshly dead after a collision with<br />

23/05/1973 male ? city 1.5 km In the city Kraliky Chequia Novotny. D. window, conserved in Kraliky<br />

Museum<br />

15


<strong>Grouse</strong> <strong>News</strong> 41 <strong>News</strong>letter of the <strong>Grouse</strong> Group<br />

22/02/2006 male ? village ? Aiglun (04) France Normant F killed by collision with window<br />

05/10/1968 male ? village 0.2 km in the village Zofingen (AG) Switzerland<br />

in Blattner<br />

(1995)<br />

1987 male ? village 0.6 km in the village<br />

Oensingen<br />

(SO)<br />

Switzerland<br />

in Blattner<br />

(1995) 1<br />

16/09/1966 male ? village 1.6 km in the village<br />

Le Russey<br />

(Doubs)<br />

France Michelat JM<br />

walk into a room by open door of<br />

the post office in the village<br />

14/09/2006 male ? village 100 m in the village<br />

Bois d'Amont<br />

(39)<br />

France Lamy G.<br />

captured alive in an open hangar<br />

and release<br />

captured alive after collision with<br />

04/04/2009 male juvenile village 100-200 m<br />

in the center of<br />

the village<br />

Contamine-<br />

Montjoie (74)<br />

France Garcel. G<br />

a window. radio-equipped and<br />

tracked up to November (when<br />

killed by a predator)<br />

23/03/2009 male juvenile village 4 km in the village Dizy Switzerland Favre P. killed by collision with window<br />

23/03/2000 male ? village 50 m les billets Samoëns (74) France Desmet. JF killed by collision with electric wire<br />

17/10/2009 Male ? castle estate 50 m<br />

01/02/1993 male ?<br />

warehouse in a<br />

village<br />

100- 500 m<br />

in the kitchen<br />

garden<br />

close to or in the<br />

village<br />

16<br />

Chenecey-<br />

Buillon (25)<br />

Les<br />

Geneveyssur-Coffrane<br />

France Cannelle J. Observed alive in a walled garden<br />

Suisse<br />

Von Allmen C.-<br />

A.<br />

1 Blattner, M. 1998. Der arealschwund des Haselhuhns Bonasa bonasia in der Nordwestschweiz. - Ornis<br />

Beobatcher 95:11-38.<br />

2 Mulhauser, B. 2003. Vie de la Gélinotte des bois Bonasa bonasia dans les forêts du Haut-Jura Franco-<br />

Suisse. - Bulletin de la Société Neuchâteloise des Sciences Naturelles 126:15-53.<br />

Distance to the nearest forest averaged 0.4 km for females (n=6) and 0.8 km for males (n=18).<br />

Maximum distances were 1.2 km for females and 4 km for males. The most surprising observations<br />

involved two cases of males in alpine meadows, one found dead lying on the snow at 2,200 m, and the<br />

other photographed alive at 2,460 m at the rocky top of a mountain (see Figures 1 & 2).<br />

Figure 1. Hazel grouse cock at the top of the Piolit<br />

Mountain, south-eastern French Alps, 10/10/2009.<br />

Photo Gilles Itier.<br />

Figure 2. Hazel grouse cock dead on a snow pack,<br />

Swiss Alps, Grimsel Mountain, 4/05/2008. Photo<br />

Mathieu Stigler.<br />

Use of hedges and corridors.<br />

Case studies at Auzet. Space behaviour of radio-equipped hazel grouse in forest fragmented by pastures<br />

- Male "Diapason"<br />

Annual home range covered 27.5 ha, encompassing 3.8 ha of pastures with some hedgerows (Figure 3).<br />

Size of seasonal home ranges was 2.8 ha in spring, 9.2 in summer and 18.3 in autumn. Mating status of<br />

this male was not clearly established in spring but a pair was flushed at the capture site two days before<br />

capture. In autumn, he was observed two times with a female.<br />

observed alive and photographed.<br />

in Mulhauser 2003 2


Annual<br />

Autumn<br />

Winter<br />

<strong>Grouse</strong> <strong>News</strong> 41 <strong>News</strong>letter of the <strong>Grouse</strong> Group<br />

Figure 3. Localisations and seasonal home ranges (MCP) of a radio-equipped hazel grouse male at Auzet<br />

(south-eastern French Alps).<br />

Fixes close to forest edges (< 20 m) represented 38 % of total fixes and selection analysis showed a<br />

positive selection for edges and rejection of forest interior in the male's home range (Table 2). The<br />

tendency to use forest edges changed during seasons with main use in autumn (Table 2).<br />

Table 2. Analysis of edge selection of two radio-equipped hazel grouse in south-eastern French Alps. LR:<br />

value of Log-likelihood ratio test, Wi: selection ratio standard error, P: probability value, NS : Nonsignificant.<br />

* Only two locations per nests were kept for analysis to prevent over weighting of nest habitat<br />

characteristics. Significant threshold was fixed to 0.016 using Bonferroni correction.<br />

Male "Diapason" Female "Jeunette" year 1 * Female "Jeunette" year 2 *<br />

LR P Wi P LR P Wi P LR P Wi P<br />

edge (20m)<br />

3.1


<strong>Grouse</strong> <strong>News</strong> 41 <strong>News</strong>letter of the <strong>Grouse</strong> Group<br />

- Female "Jeunette".<br />

The spatial behaviour of this female was studied during 21 months. Annual home range (October to<br />

August) of the first year covered 94 ha, encompassing 10.1 ha of pastures (Figure 4). Autumn, winter,<br />

spring and summer home<br />

ranges covered 43.5, 19.8,<br />

11.9 and 17.4 ha<br />

respectively. This female did<br />

not raise a brood because of<br />

predation on both a first and<br />

second clutch. The second<br />

year (September to June<br />

when battery failed) covered<br />

47.7 ha encompassing 4.8 ha<br />

of pastures. Autumn, winter<br />

and spring home ranges<br />

covered 13.8, 29.8 and 12.1<br />

ha respectively (Figure 5).<br />

Figure 5. Seasonal home<br />

range (MCP) and<br />

localisations of a radioequipped<br />

hazel grouse<br />

female "Jeunette" during<br />

the second year of<br />

monitoring. White arrows<br />

and stars show location of<br />

nests. A: location of the<br />

ruin of an old farm (see<br />

text and Figure 6).<br />

18<br />

Figure 4. Seasonal home<br />

range (MCP) and<br />

localisations of a radioequipped<br />

hazel grouse<br />

female "Jeunette" during the<br />

first year of monitoring.<br />

White arrows and stars<br />

show location of nests. A:<br />

location of the ruin of an old<br />

farm (see text and Figure 6).


<strong>Grouse</strong> <strong>News</strong> 41 <strong>News</strong>letter of the <strong>Grouse</strong> Group<br />

During the 21 months 23% of fixes were in edge (< 20 m) and selection analysis showed a clear trend<br />

to over use of edge and rejection of forest interior (Table 2). This female, usually accompanied by a nonequipped<br />

male, showed particular attraction for a small grove (0.1 ha) near a farm ruin surrounded by<br />

pasture (Figure 6). From autumn to spring 17 % (first year) and 18% (second year) of localisations were<br />

recorded in this spot (not counting fixes during incubation). This attraction could be related to abundance<br />

of feeding trees (notably domestic trees such as plum, cherry and pear trees mixed with hazel and<br />

hawthorn).<br />

Figure 6. View of the ruin of an old farm house in a small grove surrounded by pasture where female<br />

"Jeunette" was often localised, Auzet, south-eastern French Alps.<br />

We located four nests and only the last one of the second year succeeded, the others being destroyed<br />

by carnivores. Only the replacement clutch of the first year was located in forest edge (Figure 4). It was<br />

destroyed one or two days before hatching and the female barely escaped, leaving numerous feathers<br />

(stress moult) in the nest. This event likely explained the sudden shift of the summer range (Figure 4).<br />

In the second winter of monitoring, this female again showed a strange behaviour when she suddenly<br />

left her regular home range to move to the home range of a radio-equipped female neighbour (Figure 5).<br />

From mid-December to the end of January, these two females, accompanied by a third radio-equipped<br />

female coming from another neighbouring territory, seemed to form a stable group. This temporary shift<br />

of home range could not be associated with the search for highly attractive resources, as this place was<br />

not especially rich in deciduous feeding trees. This exceptional association with two females in winter,<br />

never noticed in other radio-equipped hazel grouse and not cited in the literature (apart from special<br />

behaviour of east-Siberian populations (Swenson et al. 1995)) could be linked to loss of mate but we<br />

could not get any proof of that.<br />

- Observations of hazel grouse in corridors in Sumava.<br />

Between 2005 and 2010 we recorded 11 cases without telemetry when hazel grouse had left closed forests<br />

and were found in linear vegetation structures (width 4-50 m, mean 18.5 m), surrounded by open<br />

grassland (Table 3). Eight birds were seen in 6 occasions, 5 data resulted from indirect evidence like a<br />

dust bath and/or droppings. Distances of birds from closed forests were between 20 and 250 m (mean 82<br />

m). The vegetation of linking structures included bands of forest and shrubs, as well as stone walls<br />

bordered by birch, pine Pinus sylvestris, hazel, spruce Picea abies, hawthorn Crataegus sp., juniper<br />

Juniperus communis and mountain ash Fraxinus excelsior.<br />

19


<strong>Grouse</strong> <strong>News</strong> 41 <strong>News</strong>letter of the <strong>Grouse</strong> Group<br />

Table 3. Corridors used by hazel grouse in Sumava.<br />

N° Date Kind of observation<br />

Distance from<br />

forest (m)<br />

Type of linking structure<br />

Width of<br />

corridor (m)<br />

Site No. Sex<br />

1 14.10.2005 pair, feeding 90 old pine, birch 10-20 77 M,F<br />

2 29.03.2006 droppings 90 old pine, birch 10-20 77 ?<br />

3 07.10.2005 dust bath 70 stone wall, single spruce 2-5 96 ?<br />

4 02.04.2006 old burrow 20 old birch-bordered road 4-6 3 ?<br />

5 07.08.2005 dust bath 80 old spruce, birch, hazel 20-40 7 ?<br />

6 10.10.2009 flight from ground 60 old spruce spot 30 121 M<br />

7 10.10.2009<br />

flight from<br />

mountain ash<br />

70 maple, mountain ash, cherry 10 120 ?<br />

8 22.10.2010 flight 30 ash, birch-corridor 10 territory N M<br />

9 22.10.2010 flight from ground 50 juniper, stone-walls, pine 20 137 M,F<br />

10 21.10.2010 male feeding 90 pine, birch, hawthorn 10-20 77 M<br />

11 21.10.2010 dust bath 250 pine, spruce, hazel, birch 50 75 ?<br />

Discussion<br />

Dispersal and landscape fragmentation<br />

Our previous telemetry studies in the French Alps led us to formulate several conclusions and hypotheses<br />

concerning dispersal patterns in hazel grouse and the impact of landscape structure on individual<br />

movements (Montadert & Léonard 2006; Montadert & Leonard in press). Our main conclusions were:<br />

1. Natal dispersal distances in hazel grouse are usually short (< 5 km, n = 35) and mostly undertaken<br />

under the secure cover of continuous forest. The dispersal distance of males is longer than that of females<br />

beca<br />

dispersal (> 10 km, n = 4) which sometimes lead them to cross open habitat with temporary use of small<br />

wooded patches or hedgerows in an agricultural landscape. Dispersal period is exclusively autumn for<br />

juvenile females but both autumn and spring for juvenile males, in particular for long dispersers.<br />

2. Dispersal distance per se does not lead directly to a higher mortality risk, but longer use of<br />

unfamiliar habitat seems to increase mortality.<br />

3. Hazel grouse range expansion in the south-eastern French Alps is characterized by a relatively low<br />

expansion rate (estimated 1.5 km/year ) and the avoidance of open alpine ridges over 2,000 m high.<br />

New data gained in this study partially confirm the above conclusions:<br />

- A hazel grouse out of forest is a rare event. For instance, among 851 data of geo-localised sightings<br />

of hazel grouse in the French Jura between 1996 and 2010 (ONCFS/GTJ Data base), only three involved<br />

a bird out of forest.<br />

- Clearly, frequentation of unfamiliar sites is risky, in particular human settlements where numerous<br />

birds were killed by colliding with windows or wires.<br />

- Females were rarely observed in open habitats (only in autumn), whereas males were recorded both<br />

in fall and spring in unsuitable open habitats. The fact that juvenile male hazel grouse in the Alps move<br />

further during dispersal than juvenile females is also supported by our new data as the sex ratio of<br />

occasional sightings of birds outside forests is clearly male biased. These data suggest that males are more<br />

willing to cross open landscapes. The male-biased dispersal is contrary to what is currently known in<br />

other grouse species (see Montadert & Leonard (in press) for synthesis of natal dispersal patterns in<br />

grouse).<br />

- Furthermore, we collected two observations of males in alpine meadows, suggesting that high rocky<br />

ridges could be crossed during dispersal even though none of our radio-equipped birds did so. Therefore<br />

open alpine meadows may not be absolute barriers to hazel grouse and this could explain several<br />

occasional sightings reported in remote upper valleys of the Maritime Alps (still free of permanent hazel<br />

grouse population). These valleys can only be reached by crossing high open alpine habitat. Females<br />

seem to prefer denser and safer forest or shrub habitats, with open ground being more of a barrier to their<br />

movements. These observations strengthen the hypothesis that colonization of habitats in a fragmented<br />

landscape is limited more by female dispersal than by male dispersal.<br />

The use of corridors and edge by hazel grouse<br />

Tracking data obtained at Auzet showed that, in particular conditions, some adult hazel grouse can use<br />

edge and corridor structures as regular resources in their home ranges. Without telemetry at Sumava, we<br />

20


<strong>Grouse</strong> <strong>News</strong> 41 <strong>News</strong>letter of the <strong>Grouse</strong> Group<br />

could not assess age and territorial status of hazel grouse observed in corridors, but it is likely that in<br />

several cases these linking structures were part of permanent adult territories.<br />

As to natal dispersal, even if some juvenile males can occasionally cross open gaps, the few longdispersing<br />

males tracked in the south-eastern French Alps passed through cover of wooded corridors and<br />

isolated groves. These linking structures could play a major role for the even rarer long-disperser females<br />

by permitting them to cross open lands that otherwise would be barriers to reaching the next habitat patch.<br />

It is possible that the importance of edge structures as regular resources differed between the two<br />

regions. At Auzet, such use appeared to be rare as only 2 birds among 89 radio-equipped cocks and hens<br />

settled in fragmented forest and showed particular attraction to forest edges (M. Montadert, unpublished<br />

data). Several other radio-equipped birds had part of their regular home range bordered by pastures, but<br />

we found no permanent attraction for immediate forest edge among these birds, apart from occasional<br />

sightings in attractive feeding trees (mainly willow Salix caprea in spring and hawthorn in winter). It is<br />

also noteworthy that local radio-equipped broods did not use forest-pasture edges, but rather small<br />

clearings imbedded within forest (M. Montadert, unpublished data). At Auzet, feeding trees was<br />

randomly scattered at variable density in "closed" forests with a semi-open and coarse-grained structure,<br />

which permitted growth of light-demanding trees and a well-developed herbaceous field layer. A forest<br />

with gap structure like that found at Auzet is really different from the closed forests of Sumava. In this<br />

latter study area where intensive forestry has resulted in spruce monocultures, a more intensive use of<br />

forest edges by hazel grouse is suspected because feeding trees and a well-developed field layer are often<br />

concentrated at stand borders. The comparison of the two different study areas shows that the hazel<br />

grouse is above all a forest bird preferring young succession and/ or multi-layered old stands with a gap<br />

structure and that in sub-optimal habitat conditions it can compensate for food resources that are rare and<br />

clumped by integrating richer edges into its home range. Yet, such behavioural plasticity could affect<br />

individual fitness if vulnerability to predators is higher at forest edge.<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

Many thanks to all contributors of hazel grouse data out of forest: Bernard Frochot, Dominique Michelat,<br />

Bruno Matthieu, Jean-François Desmet, Jean-François Normand, Geoffrey Garcel and special mention for<br />

Swiss team and Ornithological Swiss Station: Martin Blattner, Bertrand Posse, Pierre Henrioux, Raphael<br />

Arlettaz, Alain Barbalat, Anatole Gerber. We also need to thanks Patrick Léonard, Patricia Michel, Roger<br />

Izoard and A. Sewit for indispensable field assistance at Auzet and Sumava. Finally, we are grateful to<br />

Larry Ellison who kindly reviewed the manuscript.<br />

References<br />

Aberg, J., Jansson, G., Swenson, J.E. & Angelstam, P. 1995. The effect of matrix on the occurrence of<br />

hazel grouse (Bonasa bonasia) in isolated habitat fragments. - Oecologia 103: 265-269.<br />

Bonczar, Z. & Swenson, J.E. 1992. Geographical variation in spotting patterns on Hazel <strong>Grouse</strong> Bonasa<br />

bonasia primary feathers: consequences for age determination. - Ornis Fennica 69: 193-197.<br />

Calenge, C. 2006. The package "AdeHabitat" for the R software: A tool for the analysis of space and<br />

habitat use by animals. - Ecological Modelling 197: 516-519.<br />

Fang, Y. & Sun, Y.-H. 1997. Brood movement and natal dispersal of hazel grouse Bonasa bonasia at<br />

Changbai Mountain, Jilin Province, China - Wildlife Biology 3: 261-264.<br />

Klaus, S. 1995. Hazel <strong>Grouse</strong> in the Bohemian Forest - results of a 20-year study. Pp. 27-33 in D. Jenkins<br />

(editor). Proceedings of the International <strong>Grouse</strong> Symposium 6, World Pheasant Association,<br />

Reading, Great Britain.<br />

Klaus, S. & Sewit, A. 2000 Ecology and conservation of hazel grouse Bonasa bonasia in the Bohemian<br />

forest (Sumava, Czech Republic). Pp. 138-146 in P. Malkova (editor). Proceedings of the<br />

International Conference in Ceské Budejovice. Korsach, Vyskocil, V., Ceské Budejovice, Czech<br />

Republic.<br />

Manly, B.F.J., McDonald, L.L., Thomas, D.L., McDonald, T.L. & Erickson, W.P. 2002. Resource<br />

Selection by Animals: Statistical Design and Analysis for Field Studies. - Kluwer Academic<br />

Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.<br />

Montadert, M. & Leonard, P. 2009. Age determination of hazel grouse in the south-western limit of its<br />

European range. - <strong>Grouse</strong> <strong>News</strong> 37: 7-14.<br />

Montadert, M. & Leonard, P. in press. Natal dispersal patterns in Hazel grouse: consequences for<br />

population dynamics in heterogeneous landscapes. - Studies in Avian Biology.<br />

Montadert, M. & Léonard, P. 2003. Survival in an expanding hazel grouse Bonasa bonasia population in<br />

the southeastern French Alps. - Wildlife Biology 9: 357-364.<br />

Montadert, M. & Léonard, P. 2006. Post-juvenile dispersal of Hazel grouse Bonasa bonasia in an<br />

expanding population of the southeasten French Alps. - Ibis 148: 1-13.<br />

21


<strong>Grouse</strong> <strong>News</strong> 41 <strong>News</strong>letter of the <strong>Grouse</strong> Group<br />

Sewitz, A. & Klaus, S. 1997. Besiedlung isolierter waldinseln im vorland des böhmerwaldes durch das<br />

haselhuhn (Bonasa bonasia). - Beiträge zur Jagd- und Wildforschung, Bd. 22: 263-276.<br />

Sun, Y.-H., Piao, Z.-J. & Swenson, J.E. 2003. Occurrence of hazel grouse Bonasa bonasia in a heavily<br />

human-impacted landscape near the Changbai Mountains, northeastern China. - Wildlife Biology 9:<br />

371-375.<br />

Swenson, J.E. 1991. Is the Hazel <strong>Grouse</strong> a poor disperser? Pp. 347-352 in S. Csanyi & J. Ernhaft<br />

(editors). Proceedings of the Congress of the International Union of Game Biologists. 20, Gödöllö,<br />

Hungary.<br />

Swenson, J.E., Andreev, A.V. & Drovetski, S.V. 1995. Factors shaping winter social <strong>org</strong>anization in<br />

Hazel <strong>Grouse</strong> Bonasa bonasia: a comparative study in the eastern and western Palearctic. - Journal of<br />

Avian Biology 26: 4-12.<br />

Marc Montadert, ONCFS, les Granges Michel, 25300 Les Verrières de Joux, France.<br />

Marc.montadert@wanadoo.fr.<br />

Siegfried Klaus, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Hans-Knöll-Str. 10, D-07745 Jena,<br />

siegi.klaus@gmx.de.<br />

Investigating the importance of thermal refugia for white-tailed<br />

ptarmigan at the southern extent of their range.<br />

Don Wolfe and Lena Larsson.<br />

Due to the aridity, extreme temperatures, and sparse vegetation, high alpine environments can be<br />

exceptionally harsh, and are inhabited by only a few vertebrate species that have various adaptations that<br />

allow them to persist. For some species, migration to lower elevations or latitude during winters permit<br />

them to utilize the high alpine in summers, while other species that remain alpine hibernate for upwards<br />

of 5-6 months, or cache food in burrows. Most avifauna employ the first of those options mentioned,<br />

however a few species, such as rock ptarmigan Lagopus muta and white-tailed ptarmigan Lagopus<br />

leucura can survive the harsh winters by consuming little more than twigs or buds, with occasional downslope<br />

forays for other vegetation, and by making use of snow burrows for shelter from the cold (in<br />

addition to their various physiological and morphological adaptations). While we all recognize and<br />

perhaps marvel at how well ptarmigan are adapted for extreme cold, another question is how they adapt to<br />

the high solar radiation in the summer? (e.g. occasionally in excess of 50° C, Potapov 2004, Acta<br />

Zoologica Sinica 50:970-977).<br />

Like some populations of rock ptarmigan in Europe and Asia, the Rocky Mountain populations of<br />

white-tailed ptarmigan have adapted to live in high alpine habitats at a much lower latitude than what one<br />

might expect. The southernmost extent of the white-tailed ptarmigan distribution is in north-central New<br />

Mexico, at a latitude of just below 36 degrees North. However, the sustainability of this population may<br />

be precarious, due to upslope advancement of trees, vegetational shifts due to climate change, and to<br />

general warming that adversely affect the species‟ ability to thermoregulate. Over the past 5 years, we<br />

have surveyed peaks and high alpine ridges of the Sangre de Cristo Mountains, New Mexico, to<br />

determine the present occupied range of ptarmigan within the state. Preliminary results indicate that<br />

ptarmigan in New Mexico are found predominately above 3750 meters (over 99% of sightings or sign),<br />

and are always found within or in close proximity to large boulder fields. We theorize that the crevices<br />

within these boulder fields not only provide protection from the ever present aerial predators, but also<br />

provide thermal refugia for ptarmigan and other alpine obligates. In 2010, we attempted to determine the<br />

value of such thermal refugia by the use of temperature/relative humidity data loggers. We deployed 12<br />

pairs of data loggers, each consisting of a logger in a likely refugium location, and a second nearby on the<br />

alpine surface. Six sets of loggers were deployed at the Wheeler Peak Wilderness Area at elevations<br />

ranging from 3720 to 3906 meters a.s.l., and six sets were deployed at the Pecos Wilderness Area at<br />

elevations ranging from 3768 to 3923 meters a.s.l. Generally, the refugia loggers recorded cooler<br />

temperatures during afternoons and warmer temperatures during nights and early mornings. (Figures 1,<br />

2). For all sets, the mean afternoon high temperatures for the refugia loggers were lower than for the<br />

surface loggers; although some sets showed a much greater difference than others (e.g., see Wheeler Set 1<br />

and Wheeler Set 3, Figure 3).<br />

22


<strong>Grouse</strong> <strong>News</strong> 41 <strong>News</strong>letter of the <strong>Grouse</strong> Group<br />

Figure 1. Average daily temperatures for the entire month of August 2010 at Wheeler Peak Wilderness<br />

Area.<br />

We plan to collect additional data logger climate data in the summer of 2011 (perhaps even longer),<br />

and will attempt to quantify the amount of suitable habitat at various elevations and other factors (such as<br />

size and location of willow thickets). We also plan to quantify ptarmigan abundance as related to the<br />

available thermal refugia. Thus far, the temperature differences seen between refugia and alpine surface<br />

seem to support our hypothesis on the association of boulder fields and ptarmigan occupancy.<br />

Figure 2. Average daily temperatures for the entire month of August 2010 at Pecos Wilderness Area.<br />

23


<strong>Grouse</strong> <strong>News</strong> 41 <strong>News</strong>letter of the <strong>Grouse</strong> Group<br />

Figure 3. Mean high temperatures for all data loggers from 15 July through 31 August 2010.<br />

Don Wolfe and Lena Larsson, G. M. Sutton Avian Research Center, University of Oklahoma, Bartlesville,<br />

OK, USA. dwolfe@ou.edu.<br />

Is GPS and satellite telemetry an option for grouse research?<br />

Since the 1960s, radio telemetry has become the standard method to study activity patterns, movements<br />

and habitat use of many wildlife, including grouse. Very High Frequency (VHF) radio transmitters<br />

located with hand-held receivers have been widely used in grouse studies; yet, it remained labour<br />

intensive. The Argos satellite system became available for wildlife use in the 1980s, and allowed<br />

convenient automatic tracking over long distances. However although technical improvements have<br />

reduced the size and weight of Argos Platform Transmitter Terminals (PTTs) significantly, major<br />

shortcomings remained in large location errors (150-1,500m) and varying degrees of successful<br />

transmitter uplinks depending on topography, latitude and power level (Kaczensky et al. 2010).<br />

In the mid-1990s, Global Positioning System (GPS) collars became available for wildlife tracking. By<br />

now, GPS telemetry systems promise precise locations on a pre-defined schedule, remote data access, and<br />

easily calculable and predictable costs. Various reports have addressed whether the new equipment can<br />

live up to these high expectations (Kaczensky et al. 2010 and references therein). So far, published<br />

applications of Argos and GPS telemetry in grouse research are rare. We are aware of a single study on<br />

capercaillie in Norway (Wegge et al. 2007). The most critical questions when considering using satellitebased<br />

telemetry systems for grouse are these:<br />

24


<strong>Grouse</strong> <strong>News</strong> 41 <strong>News</strong>letter of the <strong>Grouse</strong> Group<br />

How to fix tags on grouse, and is the backpack-method acceptable? How frequently do I have to<br />

expect technical problems, and particularly transmitter failures? How about precision and reliability of<br />

locations, particularly in forested and mountainous areas? Are there any unexpected and unforeseeable<br />

costs involved?<br />

Here, we report experience from published work on capercaillie in the boreal forest of Norway<br />

(Wegge et al. 2007) and from an ongoing study on rock ptarmigan in the tundra of Svalbard. Please do<br />

report further experience to share with colleagues – we will follow up on this topic in later Issues of GN.<br />

References<br />

Kaczensky, P., Ito, T.Y. & Walzer, C.2010. Satellite telemetry of large mammals in Mongolia: what<br />

expectations should we have for collar function? - Wildlife Biology in Practice 2010; 2(6); 108-126.<br />

Wegge, P., Finne, M.H. & Rolstad, J. 2007. GPS satellite telemetry provides new insight into capercaillie<br />

Tetrao urogallus brood movements. - Wildlife Biology 13 (Suppl. 1): 87-94.<br />

Ilse Storch, Department of Wildlife Ecology and Management, Institute of Forest Zoology, University of<br />

Freiburg, D-79085 Freiburg, Germany, ilse.storch@wildlife.uni-freiburg.de<br />

GPS satellite telemetry used on capercaillie Tetrao urogallus<br />

The movement patterns of young capercaillie broods was studied using GPS satellite telemetry (Wegge et<br />

al. 2007). The aim was to test if this new technology could be applied to gain more detailed insight into<br />

behaviour and habitat selection at a small spatial scale, and if so to compare the broods‟ relative use of<br />

planted and older, naturally regenerated forests. Hens of four broods with chicks 2-7 days old were<br />

captured and fitted with backpacks of 90g containing GPS units and VHF transmitters. The GPS units<br />

were programmed to record positions every 15 minutes, the shortest interval possible. The transmitter had<br />

a storage capacity of 450 positions and movements could then be monitored for ca 4.5 days (Wegge et al.<br />

2007).<br />

In the study area at Varaldskogen with moderate topography, the GPS technology performed quite<br />

well (Wegge et al. 2007). A total of 1,277 positions were obtained (84% of potential maximum), of which<br />

77% were within 20 m of the true position of the brood. It was surprising that 84% of the potential<br />

number of recordings was recorded since brood hens move on the ground in dense vegetation and under a<br />

canopy of trees. The transmitter of 5-6% of the birds‟ weight did not seem to affect the birds negatively<br />

(Wegge et al. 2007). The GPS locations with


<strong>Grouse</strong> <strong>News</strong> 41 <strong>News</strong>letter of the <strong>Grouse</strong> Group<br />

Experiences of satellite tags on rock ptarmigans<br />

Eva Fuglei & Åshild Ønvik Pedersen<br />

Here we report our experiences by use of satellite telemetry on a subspecies of the rock ptarmigan<br />

Lagopus muta, the Svalbard rock ptarmigan Lagopus muta hyperborea from an ongoing pilot study<br />

(http://svalbardrype.npolar.no/en/).<br />

Among many unknown aspects of the Svalbard rock ptarmigan‟s biology one is whether the birds<br />

migrate seasonally within the Svalbard archipelago (Pedersen et al. 2005). No knowledge exists about<br />

their wintering areas and possible migration routes during the Arctic winter (October through March).<br />

Claims have been made that this species could perform long-range migration, a behavior that can allow<br />

them to track seasonal shift in suitable feeding areas (Pedersen et al. 2005; Gudmundsson 1972).<br />

The Svalbard rock ptarmigan is the<br />

only resident terrestrial bird in the high<br />

Arctic Svalbard archipelago, Norway<br />

(74-81°N, 10-30°E). Svalbard, approx.<br />

62,700 km 2 , is a remote area, with<br />

almost no people living and no road<br />

connections between the few<br />

communities, so the ability for<br />

retaining tagged ptarmigan is limited.<br />

Therefore, the most effective method<br />

for gathering reliable data about bird<br />

migrations and overwintering areas is<br />

satellite telemetry. Since we were able<br />

to capture birds in May only, the tags<br />

needed to last for more than 12<br />

months. We selected Argoscompatible<br />

bird tracking PTTs<br />

Figure 1. Svalbard rock ptarmigan mounted with a 20 g<br />

satellite tag. Photo E. Fuglei.<br />

26<br />

(Platform terminal transmitters)<br />

designed and commercialized by<br />

NorthStar Sciences and Technology<br />

(http://www.northstarst.com/). We<br />

used 20 gram battery powered PTTs with a battery life time expectancy of up to 500 hours. For the tags to<br />

work for more than 12 months they were programmed with a duty cycle (i.e. pre-defined transmitting<br />

period) of 5 h every 5 day. It is important to note that the Svalbard rock ptarmigan are heavier than rock-<br />

and willow ptarmigan Lagopus lagopus living for instance in mainland Norway. Rock ptarmigan in<br />

Svalbard show large seasonal variations in<br />

body weight due to heavy fat deposition in<br />

autumn, and their bodyweight can vary<br />

from 500-550 g in summer to 900-1200 g<br />

in winter (Steen and Unander 1985). The<br />

weight of the tag should not exceed more<br />

than about 4 % of the birds body weight.<br />

We also based our selection of satellite tags<br />

on the experiences conducted on ivory gulls<br />

(Gilg et al. 2010). The transmitters were<br />

attached to the birds like a backpack that<br />

consisted of a plastic covered neck ring (4-<br />

5 cm in diameter) with a flat “tail” to fasten<br />

the PTT on (Figure 1, Figure 2).<br />

We captured and mounted 8 ptarmigans<br />

with satellite tags in May 2009 (5 hens and<br />

3 males) and 10 in May 2010 (4 hens and 6<br />

males). Since the Svalbard rock ptarmigan<br />

is extremely tame and show very little<br />

marked fear behavior we were able to get<br />

Figure 2. Svalbard rock ptarmigan flying with a satellite<br />

tag mounted on its back. Photo Å. Ø. Pedersen.<br />

close and capture them by using to different methods. (1) With a hand held Supertalon net gun<br />

(http://lawenforcementmall.com/ supertalon.html) where a net is shot from a distance of 7-10 m over the


<strong>Grouse</strong> <strong>News</strong> 41 <strong>News</strong>letter of the <strong>Grouse</strong> Group<br />

Figure 3. One of the methods used for capturing the<br />

Svalbard rock ptarmigan. Guiding of ptarmigans against<br />

the mist net mounted on two bamboo poles. Photo K.<br />

Lone.<br />

27<br />

birds or (2) by using a mist net mounted<br />

on two long bamboo poles held by two<br />

people, while two other persons guided<br />

the ptarmigans against the net that was<br />

put over them (Figure 3).<br />

All of the 8 satellite tags deployed in<br />

May 2009 functioned satisfactorily (of a<br />

total of 4586 positions 84 % where of<br />

good quality, bearings that was good<br />

enough for us to estimate a location). In<br />

detail, after losing one bird during the<br />

hunt in September 2009, we lost contact<br />

with the first tag in March 2010, the<br />

second in late April, the third and fourth<br />

in mid-May, and the last three still<br />

worked by July 2010. Our experience<br />

with the 10 tags deployed in May 2010 is<br />

somewhat different. Here we also lost<br />

one bird during the hunt in September<br />

2010, but we lost contact with the first 6<br />

tags already during summer 2010, the<br />

next in October 2010, while the last two tags are still working by February 2011. We are currently<br />

discussing with NorthStar Sciences and Technology the reason why we lost contact with almost all the<br />

tags we mounted in 2010. So far we have not been able to solve the problem. In order to get more<br />

experience with the satellite tags we are planning to put out up to 5 more tags in May 2011.<br />

Thanks to support from the Governor of Svalbard, Svalbard Environmental Protection Fund,<br />

Nansenfondet, Sparebanken Nord-N<strong>org</strong>es gavefond and Norwegian Polar Institute<br />

References.<br />

Gilg, O., Strøm, H., Aebischer, A., Gavrilo, M. V., Volkov, A. E., Miljeteig, C. & Sabard, B. 2010. Postbreeding<br />

movements of notheast Atlantic ivory gull Pagophila eburnea populations. J. Avian Biol,<br />

41: 532-542.<br />

Gudmundsson, F. 1972. Grit as an indicator of the overseas origin of certain birds occurring in Iceland.<br />

Ibis 114: 582.<br />

Pedersen, Å. Ø., Overrein, Ø., Unander, S. & Fuglei, E. (2005) Svalbard rock ptarmigan (Lagopus mutus<br />

hyperboreus): a status report. Rapportserie no. 125, Norwegian Polar Institute. pp. 23.<br />

Steen, J. B. & Unander, S. (1985) Breeding biology of the Svalbard rock ptarmigan (Lagopus mutus<br />

hyperboreus). Ornis Scand. 16: 191-197.<br />

Eva Fuglei and Åshild Ønvik Pedersen, Norwegian Polar Institute, FRAM Centre, NO-9296 Tromsø,<br />

Norway, Email: eva.fuglei@npolar.no


<strong>Grouse</strong> <strong>News</strong> 41 <strong>News</strong>letter of the <strong>Grouse</strong> Group<br />

BOOKS REVIEWS<br />

Tetraonidae and Phasianidae of the USSR – Ecology and Morphology<br />

[Maria A. Kuz’mina. Teterevinye I Fazanovye SSSR: Ekologo-Morfologicheskaya Kharakteristika]<br />

Don Wolfe<br />

Most book reviews are of books that have recently been published or updated. So, why am I writing a<br />

review of a book that was originally published over 30 years ago, and then translated into English nearly<br />

20 years ago? Mainly because, I, as I assume with many westerners, have only vaguely been aware of the<br />

tremendous amount of grouse research that has been conducted and is still being conducted in the former<br />

Soviet Union. I feel that language barriers and politics have effectively, even if unintentionally,<br />

suppressed this vast accumulation of knowledge. Additionally, this compilation is rarely cited, and the<br />

actual book can be difficult to find. I first became aware of it through a citation in an article on ptarmigan<br />

morphology, and was able to view a copy of the book through interlibrary loan. My initial reading left me<br />

fascinated and greatly desiring my own copy, so after nearly a year of searching, I finally found and was<br />

able to purchase a copy. I would like to make other grouse researchers aware of the book, and the<br />

valuable information contained within.<br />

Maria Kuz‟mina apparently was a very detail oriented person, and this book not only includes a<br />

compilation of her decades of research on galliforms, but also many summaries of many other researchers<br />

within the former Soviet Union, other areas of Europe and Asia, and even North America. She goes into<br />

meticulous detail on differences in anatomy and morphology between families, between species, and even<br />

within species inhabiting different habitats or regions. Then, she draws conclusions on how these<br />

differences are of importance to differing migration patterns, mobility patterns, foraging behaviors, and<br />

adaptations to climates. She also is equally meticulous in summarizing diets, often comparing diets for a<br />

single species from several locations, upwards of thousands of kilometers apart.<br />

The <strong>org</strong>anization of this book may be somewhat different than several other sources. Whereas in most<br />

books, a chapter or section is devoted to a single species or family, usually following an introductory<br />

chapter, Kuz‟mina devotes entire chapters to one particular aspect of galliform ecology, and discusses the<br />

similarities and differences of that aspect between a large number of species of grouse, partridges, quail,<br />

and pheasants. While this format is valuable and may be of great interest, it can be a bit difficult and<br />

tedious if the reader is attempting to glean information on only a single species. The various chapters are<br />

as follows:<br />

1. SOME ASPECTS OF THE ORIGIN AND TAXONOMY OF GALLIFORM BIRDS<br />

2. REVIEW OF GALLIFORM BIRDS OF THE SOVIET UNION<br />

3. FEEDING<br />

4. ECOMORPHOLOGICAL ADAPTATIONS TO CLIMATIC CONDITIONS<br />

5. ECOMORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF LOCOMOTOR ORGANS<br />

6. ECOLOGICAL GROUPS OF GALLIFORM BIRDS<br />

7. CONCLUSION<br />

This book is amply illustrated with line drawings and black and white photographs that correspond to<br />

the differences in anatomy and morphology between species. There are 16 tables, distributed throughout<br />

the text, that list measurements and ranges of anatomical and morphological features. It also includes<br />

range maps of most species, but some of the maps, especially those of species with very limited<br />

distribution, are difficult to interrupt unless the reader is already intimately familiar with that particular<br />

region. Approximately 650 citations are included in the bibliography, some in Russian, some in German,<br />

and some in English. Most, but not all, of the Russian and German citations also include an English<br />

translation of the title. However, one fairly important part of the bibliography is lacking, that being the<br />

page numbers of the journal articles. Appendences are included that list all the animal and plant species<br />

mentioned in the text, with the English, Russian, and scientific names. It also appears that Mr. Siegel-<br />

Causey did a superb job in translating the text. Throughout the book, there are numbers in the left-hand<br />

column that indicate the page number of the original text in Russian.<br />

Overall, I believe that this book should be of great interest and value to all grouse researchers, not<br />

only those working in the various states that once were a part of the U.S.S.R. An updated, revised edition,<br />

including research conducted since the 1970s would especially valuable. Even if that were not to happen<br />

in the near future, making this book more readily available, either through reprinting or in electronic<br />

28


<strong>Grouse</strong> <strong>News</strong> 41 <strong>News</strong>letter of the <strong>Grouse</strong> Group<br />

format would still allow greater access to this amazing resource. Perhaps this endeavor can be attempted<br />

through the IUCN <strong>Galliformes</strong> Specialist Group.<br />

Kuz‟mina, M.A. 1977. Tetraonidae and Phasianidae of the USSR – Ecology and Morphology [Teterevinye<br />

I Fazanovye SSSR: Ekologo-Morfologicheskaya Kharakteristika] Nauka Publishers, Alma-Ata.<br />

Translated into English by Douglas Siegel-Causey, 1992; Gulab Primiani, Oxonian Pvt. Ltd, New<br />

Delhi. ISBN 81-7087-064-X.<br />

Don Wolfe, G. M. Sutton Avian Research Center, University of Oklahoma, P.O. Box 2007, Bartlesville,<br />

OK 74005,USA dwolfe@ou.edu<br />

29


<strong>Grouse</strong> <strong>News</strong> 41 <strong>News</strong>letter of the <strong>Grouse</strong> Group<br />

CONFERENCES<br />

The 12 th International <strong>Grouse</strong> Symposium postponed 1 year<br />

Hiroshi Nakamura<br />

IGS <strong>News</strong> No. 5 (4th April)<br />

Dear <strong>Grouse</strong> Scientists. Due to the unprecedented disasters and continued uncertainty about the nuclear<br />

situation in Japan, The Local Organizing Committee of IGS2011 regretfully announces that the IGS2011<br />

must be canceled this year. However, The Local Committee proposes the following: Postpone the IGS<br />

for a year.<br />

As we announced in IGS <strong>News</strong> No.4, we judged that it was possible to open the symposium in this<br />

July in Matsumoto as it was planned. We announced our decision because neither Tokyo nor Matsumoto<br />

had damage from the major earthquake and tsunami. We had hoped for the nuclear situation to be<br />

resolved in a short time. Unfortunately, the status of the damaged nuclear plant remains unforeseeable.<br />

The reports of the IAEA http://www.iaea.<strong>org</strong>/newscenter/news/tsunamiupdate01.html and other sources<br />

indicate that this is a situation of great uncertainty and a significant risk of a sudden deterioration leading<br />

to serious large-scale radiation. This uncertainty will continue for weeks and, perhaps, months.<br />

Thus, our Local Committee and the IGS Program Committee feel that we cannot carry forward the<br />

responsibility for the symposium and its participants because of the current situation. In addition, Japan is<br />

facing another new problem this summer, which is the shortage of electric power. The loss of the nuclear<br />

power plant has resulted in a regulated periodic reduction in power in Tokyo and its surrounding areas.<br />

These reductions have succeeded and the electrical problem may disappear in a short time. However, late<br />

June is the peak time of electric demand. We are afraid that we may need again the periodic reduction in<br />

power, which causes traffic problems.<br />

For these reasons, our Local Committee decided to postpone the IGS for a year. We are sorry if this<br />

has caused anyone any inconvenience, but we feel under the circumstances that we have no choice in our<br />

decision. The Committee of the <strong>Grouse</strong> Group within the IUCN <strong>Galliformes</strong> Specialist Group is<br />

supportive of our decision. We all hope that the nuclear situation will be under control by the end of this<br />

summer.<br />

All our symposium plans may be kept and adjustments can be made as needed. Current registrations<br />

will be cancelled and a new registration process will be started in the fall of 2011 as we did last year.<br />

Those who paid registration fees for 2011 will have a refund returned as soon as possible. We will also<br />

try to find a way to help those who should already have booked their flights. If you need our assistance<br />

with cancelling your flights, please contact us. My secretary, Yukiiri, and I will contact the people<br />

needing cancelation help. Our hope is that everyone who has already purchased a ticket can have a<br />

refund. We know some airlines are allowing refunds voluntarily, but if you encounter problems, we will<br />

try to help.<br />

Our Local Committee will renew our symposium plans more attractively and, hopefully, allow more<br />

participants to attend more easily in 2012. The website will be continued and information updated<br />

regularly. We would like to continue announcements using the IGS <strong>News</strong> forum until the IGS2012. I<br />

have received a lot of get-well messages by e-mail. We really appreciate your kindness. We believe that<br />

we Japanese can rise again from this unprecedented disaster.<br />

The reason that we accepted IGS in Japan is because many grouse scientists were interested in our<br />

presentation about the Japanese Rock Ptarmigan at the IGS2005 held in Luchon, France. The ptarmigan is<br />

extremely unique as I pointed out in my research reports in the <strong>Grouse</strong> <strong>News</strong> 40 (Nakamura 2010). We<br />

believe firmly that the IGS2012 held in Japan will contribute not only to the conservation of the<br />

ptarmigan but also to mark a new phase in IGS. Because we have a long history of its conservation and<br />

researches on the ptarmigan and unique ecological, cultural, and conservation status, we expect that many<br />

grouse scientists will want to participate in the IGS2012 to observe our work, the grouse, and the habitat<br />

of these isolated populations.<br />

We are looking forward to see you next year in Matsumoto, Japan.<br />

Hiroshi Nakamura, Organizer of the Local Committee of IGS2011, Faculty of Education, Shinshu<br />

University, Nagano, 380-8544, Japan, E-mail (DESK-PC): hnakamu@shinshu-u.ac.jp, E-mail<br />

(Secretary-PC): seitajm@shinshu-u.ac.jp, URL: http://cert.shinshu-u.ac.jp/eco_lab/.<br />

30


<strong>Grouse</strong> <strong>News</strong> 41 <strong>News</strong>letter of the <strong>Grouse</strong> Group<br />

Reminder – 29 th Prairie <strong>Grouse</strong> Technical Council (PGTC) Meetings<br />

October 4 - 6, 2011<br />

The 29 th Prairie <strong>Grouse</strong> Technical Council (PGTC) Meetings October 4 - 6, 2011 hosted by Kansas Dept.<br />

of Wildlife and Parks, Fort Hays State University, Hays, Kansas.<br />

A conference announcement, call for abstracts, call for Hamerstrom Award nominations and other<br />

info will be sent out through the PGTC listserv very soon. If you are not on that listserv and desire<br />

information please contact David Dahlgren at dave.dahlgren@ksoutdoors.com. Any other questions can<br />

be directed to Dave as well. We look forward to an excellent conference. There will be a field trip to<br />

Lesser Prairie Chicken range which is sympatric with Greater Prairie Chicken range in western Kansas.<br />

Dave Dahlgren, Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks, 1426 Hwy 183 Alt., PO Box 338, Hays, KS<br />

67601-0338, USA, dave.dahlgren@ksoutdoors.com.<br />

6 th European Conference Black <strong>Grouse</strong> Endangered Species<br />

First announcement<br />

Invitation<br />

The first International Black <strong>Grouse</strong> Conference was <strong>org</strong>anized in<br />

Belgium, in 2000. Since then the conferences have been <strong>org</strong>anized<br />

in different countries to gather black grouse specialists from across<br />

Europe. The 6 th meeting will be held in Sweden.<br />

We are pleased to invite you to the 6 th European Conference<br />

Black <strong>Grouse</strong> Endangered Species.<br />

The conference will be held in Gysinge, Sweden, September 2012.<br />

More information and possibilities to register on-line will added<br />

later. We hope that the conference will be a great opportunity to<br />

discuss the present situation of the black grouse in Europe and<br />

further initiatives concerning the protection of this species and its<br />

habitats.<br />

Language of the conference<br />

The official language will be English.<br />

Contact person: Jacob Höglund (jacob.hoglund@ebc.uu.se)<br />

31<br />

Photo: Hugh Jansman


<strong>Grouse</strong> <strong>News</strong> 41 <strong>News</strong>letter of the <strong>Grouse</strong> Group<br />

RECENT GROUSE LITERATURE<br />

For a complete bibliography on grouse, go to: http://www.suttoncenter.<strong>org</strong>/pages/publications (please<br />

note that the link in previous editions may not be current).<br />

Adam, A., L. M. I. Webster, W. Mullen, L. F. Keller, P. C. D. Johnson. 2011. Quantifying fenbendazole<br />

and its metabolites in self-medicating wild Red <strong>Grouse</strong> Lagopus lagopus scoticus using an HPLC-MS-<br />

MS approach. Veterinary Parasitology XXX:XXX-XXX \(online early).<br />

Alda, F., P. Sastre, P. J. De La Cruz-Cardiel, and I. Doadrio. 2011. Population genetics of the<br />

endangered Cantabrian Capercaillie in northern Spain. Animal Conservation XXX: XXX -<br />

XXX(onlineearly).<br />

Augustine, J. K., and B. K. Sandercock. 2011. Demography of female Greater Prairie-Chickens in<br />

unfragmented grasslands in Kansas. Avian Conservation and Ecology 6(1):2. [online] URL:<br />

http://www.ace-eco.<strong>org</strong>/vol6/iss1/art2/<br />

Barnagaud, J.-Y., P. A. Crochet, Y. Magnani, A. B. Laurent, E. Menoni, C. Novoa, and O. Giminez.<br />

2011. Short-term response to the North Atlantic Oscillation but no long-term effects of climate<br />

change on the reproductive success of an alpine bird. Journal of Ornithology XXX: XXX-XXX<br />

(online early). (Black <strong>Grouse</strong>).<br />

Barry, P. D., and D. A. Tallmon. 2010. Genetic differentiation of a subspecies of Spruce <strong>Grouse</strong><br />

(Falcipennis canadensis) in an endemism hotspot. Auk 127: 617-625.<br />

Behney, A. C., C. W. Boal, H. A. Whitlaw, and D. R. Lucia. 2010. Prey use by Swainson‟s Hawks in the<br />

Lesser Prairie-Chicken range of the Southern High Plains of Texas. Journal of Raptor Research 44:<br />

317-322.<br />

Bendell, L. I. 2011. Trace metal depositional patterns from an open pit mining activity as revealed by<br />

archived avian gizzard contents. Science of the Total Environment 409:1193-1197. (Blue <strong>Grouse</strong>).<br />

Bijlsma, R. G., and E. Jansen. 2010. Het Korhoen, de Havik en Staatsbosbeheer. [The Black <strong>Grouse</strong>, the<br />

Goshawk and the state forestry service.] Takkeling 18:108-131. (in Dutch with English abstract).<br />

Blanco-Fontao, B., M. Quevedo, and J. R. Obeso. 2011. Abandonment of traditional uses in mountain<br />

areas: typological thinking versus hard data in the Cantabrian Mountains (NW Spain). Biodiversity<br />

and Conservation XXX:XXX-XXX (online early). (Capercaillie).<br />

Bochkov, A. V., and K. Skirnisson. 2011. Description of the life stages of quill mite Mironovialagopus<br />

sp. nov. (Acari: Syringophilidae) parasitizing the Rock Ptarmigan Lagopus muta (Phasianidae) from<br />

Iceland. Parasitology Research 108:715-722.<br />

Bollmann, K., R. F. Graf, and W. Suter. 2011. Quantitative predictions for patch occupancy of<br />

Capercaillie in fragmented habitats. Ecography 34:276-286.<br />

Broseth, H., and H. Chr. Pedersen. 2010. Disturbance effects of hunting activity in a Willow Ptarmigan<br />

Lagopus lagopus population. Wildlife Biology 16: 241-248.<br />

Bush, K. L., C. K. Dyte, B. J. Moynahan, C. L. Aldridge, H. S. Sauls, A. M. Battazzo, B. L. Walker, K. E.<br />

Doherty, J. Tack, J. Carlson, D. Eslinger, J. Nicholson, M. S. Boyce, D. E. Naugle, C. A.<br />

Paszkowski,and D. W. Coltman. 2011. Population structure and genetic diversity of Greater Sage-<br />

<strong>Grouse</strong> (Centrocercus urophasianus) in fragmented landscapes at the northern edge of their range.<br />

Conservation Genetics 12:527-542.<br />

Cardinal, C. J. 2011. Greater Sage-<strong>Grouse</strong> ecology, movements, and habitat use related to land use<br />

patterns in the vicinity of Bear Lake, 2010 Progress Report. Submitted to Idaho Department of Fish<br />

and Game, Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife<br />

Service, U.S. Forest Service, Idaho Department of Lands, Idaho Governor‟s Office of Species<br />

Conservation, East Idaho Uplands Sage-<strong>Grouse</strong> Local Working Group, Rich County Coordinated<br />

Resources Management Working Group, Wyoming Department of Game and Fish, and Southwest<br />

Wyoming Sage-grouse Local Working Group. Utah State University. 11pp.<br />

Carpenter, J. E., A. Aldridge, and M. S. Boyce. 2010. Sage-grouse habitat selection in winter in Alberta.<br />

Journal of Wildlife Management 74:1806-1814.<br />

Cas, M. 2010. Disturbances and predation on Capercaillie at leks in Alps and Dinaric Mountains.<br />

Sumarski List 134:487-495.<br />

Cox, R., D. Newborn, D. Baines, C. J. Thomas, and T. N. Sherratt. 2010. No evidence for resistance to<br />

Fenbendazole in Trichostrongylus tenuis, a nematode parasite of the Red <strong>Grouse</strong>. Journal of Wildlife<br />

Management 74:1799-1805.<br />

Doherty, K. E., J. D. Tack, J. S. Evans, and D. E. Naugle. 2010. Mapping breeding densities of Greater<br />

Sage-<strong>Grouse</strong>: A tool for range-wide conservation planning. Bureau of Land Management Completion<br />

Report: Interagency Agreement # L10PG00911. 31pp.<br />

32


<strong>Grouse</strong> <strong>News</strong> 41 <strong>News</strong>letter of the <strong>Grouse</strong> Group<br />

Drummer, T. D., R. G. Corace III, S. J. Sjogren. 2011. Sharp-tailed <strong>Grouse</strong> lek attendance and fidelity in<br />

upper Michigan. Journal of Wildlife Management 75:311-318<br />

Ehrbar, R., K. Bollmann, and P. Mollet. 2011. Ein Sonderwaldreservat für das Auerhuhn – das Beispiel<br />

Amden (Kanton St. Gallen). [A special forest reserve for the Capercaillie – the model of Amden<br />

(Canton St Gallen).] Schweizerische Zeitschrift fur Forstwesen 162:11-21. (In German with English<br />

abstract).<br />

Evers, L. 2010. Modeling Sage-<strong>Grouse</strong> habitat using a state-and-transition model. Ph. D. Dissertation,<br />

Oregon State University. 168pp.<br />

Fedy, B. C., and K. E. Doherty. 2011. Population cycles are highly correlated over long time series and<br />

large spatial scales in two unrelated species: Greater Sage-<strong>Grouse</strong> and cottontail rabbits. Oecologia<br />

165:915-924.<br />

Francis, I. 2010. A survey of Black <strong>Grouse</strong> in north-east Scotland in 2009. Scottish Birds 30:290-294.<br />

Gavashelishvili, A., and Z. Javakhishvili. 2010. Combining radio-telemetry and random observations to<br />

model the habitat of near threatened Caucasian <strong>Grouse</strong> Tetrao mlokosiewiczi. Oryx 44:491-500.<br />

Gillan, J. K., and E. K. Strand. 2010. Sage-grouse habitat in Idaho: a practical guide for land owners and<br />

managers. Contribution Number 1048 of the Idaho Forest, Wildlife and Range Experiment Station,<br />

University of Idaho, Moscow. 66pp.<br />

Guttery, M. R. 2011. Ecology and management of a high elevation southern range Greater Sage <strong>Grouse</strong><br />

population: vegetation manipulation, early chick survival, and hunter motivations. Ph. D. Dissertation.<br />

Utah State University. 119 pp.<br />

Habibzadeh, N., M. Karami, and A. Tarinejad. 2010. Caucasian Black <strong>Grouse</strong> (Tetrao mlokosiewiczi)<br />

breeding display sites selection in Arasbaran Region, East Azerbaijan, Iran. Russian Journal of<br />

Ecology 41:450-457.<br />

Hansen, C. P., J. J. Millspaugh, and M. A. Rumble. 2011. Occupancy modeling of Ruffed <strong>Grouse</strong> in the<br />

Black Hills National Forest. Journal of Wildlife Management 75:71-77.<br />

Hansen, C. P., M. A. Rumble, and J. J. Millspaugh. 2011. Ruffed <strong>Grouse</strong> selection of drumming sites in<br />

the Black Hills National Forest. American Midland Naturalist 165:400-411<br />

Hansen, J. L. H. Hansen, and N. M. Schmidt. 2010. Bird monitoring at Zackenberg, northeast<br />

Greenland, 2007. Bird Populations 10:56-67. (Rock Ptramigan).<br />

Hayama, S., C. Hattori, Y. Ohata, and N. Mitano. 2010. Body mass changes of Japanese Rock<br />

Ptarmigan Lagopus muta japonicus in captivity. Ornithological Science 9:149-155.<br />

Hoglund, J. J. K. Larsson, C. Corrales, G. Santafe, D. Baines, and G. Segelbacher. 2011. Genetic<br />

structure among Black <strong>Grouse</strong> in Britain: implications for designing conservation units. Animal<br />

Conservation XXX:XXX-XXX. (online early).<br />

Hunt, J. L., and T. L. Best. 2010. Vegetative characteristics of active and abandoned leks of Lesser<br />

Prairie-Chickens (Tympanuchus pallidicinctus) in southeastern New Mexico. Southwestern Naturalist<br />

55:477-487.<br />

Jarnevich, C. S., and M. K. Laubhan. 2011. Balancing energy development and conservation: a method<br />

utilizing species distribution models. Environmental Management XXX:XXX-XXX (online early).<br />

(Lesser Prairie-Chicken).<br />

Karlsson, K. 2010. Tjaderspel. [Capercaillie lek.] Anser 49:192-195. (in Swedish).<br />

Kielczynski, C. 2010. Wskaźniki biometryczne cietrzewi (Tetrao tetrix L.) w rozwoju osobniczym.<br />

[Biometrics rate of the Black <strong>Grouse</strong> (Tetrao tetrix L.) growth.] Aparatura Badawcza i Dydaktyczna<br />

15(2):125-136. (in Polish with English abstract).<br />

Klaus, S., and A. Christner. 2010. Ungewoehnliches Paarungsverhalten beim Birkhuhn Tetrao tetrix.<br />

[Atypical copulation behaviour in Black <strong>Grouse</strong> Tetrao tetrix.] Limicola 24: 140-145. (in German<br />

with English abstract).<br />

Lampila, P., E. Ranta, M. Monkkonen, H. Linden, and P. Helle. 2011. <strong>Grouse</strong> dynamics and harvesting<br />

in Kainuu, northeastern Finland. Oikos XXX:XXX-XXX (online early). (Capercaillie, Black<br />

<strong>Grouse</strong>, Hazel <strong>Grouse</strong>, Willow <strong>Grouse</strong>).<br />

Lande, U. S. 2011. <strong>Grouse</strong> – habitat relationships: monitoring, scale, and management. Ph. D.<br />

Dissertation. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. 46pp. (Capercaillie, Black <strong>Grouse</strong>,<br />

Willow Ptarmigan).<br />

Lees, J., R. Nudds, K.-A. Stokkan, L. Folkow, and J. Codd. 2010. Reduced metabolic cost of locomotion<br />

in Svalbard Rock Ptarmigan (Lagopus muta hyperborea) during winter. PLoS ONE 5(11):e15490.<br />

8pp.<br />

Lu, N., and Y.-H. Sun. 2011. Population viability analysis and conservation of Chinese <strong>Grouse</strong> Bonasa<br />

sewerzowi in Lianhuashan Nature Reserve, north-west China. Bird Conservation International 21: 49-<br />

58.<br />

33


<strong>Grouse</strong> <strong>News</strong> 41 <strong>News</strong>letter of the <strong>Grouse</strong> Group<br />

Ludwig, G. X., R. V. Alatalo, P. Helle, and H. Siitari. 2010. Individual and environmental determinants<br />

of early brood survival in Black <strong>Grouse</strong> Tetrao tetrix. Wildlife Biology 16:367-378.<br />

Ludwig, G. X., R. V. Alatalo, P. Helle, and H. Siitari. 2010. Individual and environmental determinants<br />

of daily Black <strong>Grouse</strong> nest survival rates at variable predator densities. Annales Zoologici Fennici<br />

46:387-397.<br />

Ludwig, T., and I. Storch. 2011. Re-introduction and re-enforcement as a conservation measure for<br />

grouse. Gallinformed 4:18-21.<br />

Lukaszewicz, E., A. Kowalczyk, and Z. Rzonca. 2010. Characteristics of fresh semen of captive-bred<br />

Capercaillie Tetrao urogallus L. Zoo Biology XXX:XXX-XXX. (online early).<br />

Lycke, A., L. Imbeau, and P. Drapeau. 2011. Effects of commercial thinning on site occupancy and<br />

habitat use by Spruce <strong>Grouse</strong> in boreal Quebec. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 41:501-508.<br />

Martinez-Padilla, J., P. Vergara, L. Perez-Rodriguez, F. Mougeot, F. Casas, S. C. Ludwig, J. A. Haines,<br />

M. Zeineddine, and S. M. Redpath. 2011. Condition- and parasite dependent expression of a malelike<br />

trait in a female bird. Biology Letters XXX:XXX-XXX (online early). (Red <strong>Grouse</strong>).<br />

Mays, J. K., R. F. Silva, L. F. Lee, A. M. Fadly. 2010. Characterization of reticuloendotheliosis virus<br />

isolates obtained from broiler breeders, turkeys, and prairie chickens located in various geographical<br />

regions in the United States. Avian Pathology 39:383-389.<br />

McRoberts, J. T., M. J. Butler, W. B. Ballard, M. C. Wallace, H. A. Whitlaw, and D. A. Haukos. 2011.<br />

Response of Lesser Prairie-Chickens on leks to aerial surveys. Wildlife Society Bulletin 35:27-31.<br />

Miettunen, J. 2010. Winter food use and selection of Willow <strong>Grouse</strong> (Lagopus lagopus) in southern<br />

Finland. Suo 61(2):35-48.<br />

Moran, M. 2010. Estimas de abundancia y movimientos del urogallo cantábrico mediante análisis<br />

moleculares. [Estimate of abundance and movements of the Cantabrian Capercaillie by means of<br />

molecular analyses.] M. Sc. Thesis. Dept. Biología de Organismos y Sistemas, Universidad de<br />

Oviedo. (in Spanish).<br />

Naugle, D. E., K. E. Doherty, B. L. Walker, H. E. Copeland, and J. D. Tack. 2011. Sage grouse and<br />

cumulative impacts of energy development. Pp. 213-226 in P. R. Krausman and L. K. Harris (Eds.).<br />

Cumulative effects in wildlife management: impact mitigation. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida,<br />

USA.<br />

Norton, M. A., K. C. Jensen, A. P. Leif, T. R. Kirschenmann, and G. A. Wolbrink. 2010. Resource<br />

selection of Greater Prairie-Chicken and Sharp-Tailed <strong>Grouse</strong> broods in Central South Dakota. Prairie<br />

Naturalist 42:100-108.<br />

Nudds, R. L., L. P. Folkow, J. J. Lees, P. G. Tickle, K.-A. Stokkan, and J. R. Codd. 2011. Evidence for<br />

energy savings from aerial running in the Svalbard Rock Ptarmigan (Lagopus muta hyperborea).<br />

Proceedings of the Royal Society B XXX:XXX-XXX (online early).<br />

Ohman, K., L. Edenius, and G. Mikusinski. 2011. Optimizing spatial habitat suitability and timber<br />

revenue in long-term forest planning. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 41:543-551. (Hazel<br />

<strong>Grouse</strong>).<br />

Patricelli, G. L., and A. H. Krakauer. 2011. Assets and tactics in a mating market: economic models of<br />

negotiation offer insights into animal courtship dynamics on the lek. Current Zoology XXX:XXX-<br />

XXX (online early). (Greater Sage-<strong>Grouse</strong>).<br />

Patten, M. A., and J. F. Kelly. 2010. Habitat selection and the perceptual trap. Ecological Applications<br />

20:2148-2156. (Lesser Prairie-Chicken).<br />

Pearce-Higgins, J. W. 2010. Using diet to assess the sensitivity of northern and upland birds to climate<br />

change. Climate Research 45(special issue 25):119-U435. (Black <strong>Grouse</strong>, Rock Ptarmigan, Willow<br />

Ptarmigan).<br />

Peksa, L. 2010. Inwentaryzacja cietrzewia Tetrao tetrix i gluszca Tetrao urogallus w Tatrzanskim Parku<br />

Narodowym. [Census of Black <strong>Grouse</strong> Tetrao tetrix and Capercaillie Tetrao urogallus in the Tatra<br />

National Park.] Chronmy Przyrode Ojczysta 66:384-390. (in Polish with English abstract).<br />

Perez, T., J. F. Vazquez, F. Quiros, and A. Dominguez. 2011. Improving non-invasive genotyping in<br />

Capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus): redesigning sexing and microsatellite primers to increase efficiency<br />

on faeces samples. Conservation Genetics Resources XXX:XXX-XXX (online early).<br />

Pis, T. 2010. The link between metabolic rate and body temperature in galliform birds in thermoneutral<br />

and heat exposure conditions: The classical and phylogenetically corrected approach. Journal of<br />

Thermal Biology 35:309-316.<br />

Prather, P. R. 2010. Factors affecting Gunnison Sage-<strong>Grouse</strong> (Centrocercus minimus) conservation in<br />

San Juan County, Utah. Ph. D. Dissertation. Utah State University. 126pp.<br />

Rojas, M., I. Gonzales, M. A. Pavon, N. Pegels, P. A. Hernandez, T. Garcia, and R. Martin. 2011.<br />

Development of a real-time PCR assay to control the illegal trade of meat from protected Capercaillie<br />

species (Tetrao urogallus). Forensic Science International XXX: XXX-XXX (online early).<br />

34


<strong>Grouse</strong> <strong>News</strong> 41 <strong>News</strong>letter of the <strong>Grouse</strong> Group<br />

Sandercock, B. K., E. B. Nilsen, H. Broseth, and H. C. Pedersen. 2011. Is hunting mortality additive or<br />

compensatory to natural mortality? Effects of experimental harvest on the survival and cause-specific<br />

mortality of Willow Ptarmigan. Journal of Animal Ecology 80:244-258.<br />

Sands, J. P, and M. D. Pope. 2010. A survey of galliform monitoring programs and methods in the<br />

United States and Canada. Wildlife Biology 16:342-356.<br />

Schaublin, S., and K. Bollmann. 2011. Winter habitat selection and conservation of Hazel <strong>Grouse</strong><br />

(Bonasa bonasia) in mountain forests. Journal of Ornithology 152:179-192.<br />

Selas, V., G. A. Sonerud, E. Framstad, J. A. Kalas, S. Kobro, H. B. Pedersen, T. Kr. Spidso, and O. Wiig.<br />

2011. Climate change in Norway: warm summers limit grouse reproduction. Population Ecology<br />

53:361-371. (Black <strong>Grouse</strong>, Capercaillie, Willow <strong>Grouse</strong>).<br />

Signorell, N., S. Wirthner, P. Patthey, R. Schranz, L. Rotelli, and R. Arlettaz. 2010. Concealment from<br />

predators drives foraging habitat selection in brood-rearing Alpine Black <strong>Grouse</strong> Tetrao tetrix hens:<br />

habitat management implications. Wildlife Biology 16:249-257.<br />

Skrip, M. M. 2010. Fall-winter survival, habitat, and long-term population change of Ruffed <strong>Grouse</strong> in<br />

New York State. M. Sc. Thesis. State University of New York College of Environmental Science and<br />

Forestry, Syracuse. 120pp.<br />

Slipantschuk, J., E. Ullner, M. D. Baptista, M. Zeineddine, and M. Thiel. 2010. Abundance of stable<br />

periodic behavior in a Red <strong>Grouse</strong> population model with delay: a consequence of homoclinicity.<br />

Chaos 20(4):045117.<br />

Stevens, B. S., K. P. Reeese, and J. W. Connelly. 2011. Survival and detectability bias of avian fence<br />

collision surveys in sagebrush steppe. Journal of Wildlife Management 75:437-449. (Greater Sage-<br />

<strong>Grouse</strong>).<br />

Summers, R. W., D. Dugan, and R. Proctor. 2010. Numbers and breeding success of Capercaillies<br />

Tetrao urogallus and Black <strong>Grouse</strong> T. tetrix at Abernethy Forest, Scotland. Bird Study 57:437-<br />

446.<br />

Svobodova, J., G. Segelbacher, and J. Hoglund. 2011. Genetic variation in Black <strong>Grouse</strong> populations<br />

with different lekking systems in the Czech Republic. Journal of Ornithology 152:37-44.<br />

Thiel, D., S. Jenni-Eiermann, R. Palme, and L. Jenni. 2011. Winter tourism increases stress hormone<br />

levels in the Capercaillie Tetrao urogallus. Ibis 153:122-133.<br />

Tornberg, R., P. Helle, and E. Korpimaki. 2011. Vulnerability of Black <strong>Grouse</strong> hens to Goshawk<br />

predation: result of food supply or predation facilitation? Oecologia XXX:XXX-XXX (online early).<br />

Unger, C., and S. Klaus. 2010. Einfluss der topographischen Faktoren Hoehenlage, Hangneigung und<br />

Exposition auf die Habitatwahl umgesiedelter russischer Auerhuehner Tetrao urogallus in Thueringen.<br />

[Influence of the topographical factors altitude, slope inclination, and aspect on habitat choice of<br />

Capercaillies Tetrao urogallus translocated from Russia to Thueringen.] Anzeiger des Vereins<br />

Thueringer Ornithologen 7:49-56. (in German with English abstract).<br />

Villanueva, R. L. 2011. Implementación de una red telemática que facilite el anillamiento de la hembra<br />

de urogallo. [Deployment of an IP camera network which aims to determine the time when Western<br />

Capercaillie hatch out of eggs, in order to ring the female birds.] B. Sc. Thesis. Universitat Oberta de<br />

Catalunya. (in Spanish with English abstract).<br />

Vodehnal, B., A. Pierson, T. Doeden, M. Schultz, and M. D. Blount. 2010. Location of Sharptailed<br />

<strong>Grouse</strong> and Greater Prairie-Chicken display grounds in relation to NPPD Ainsworth Wind Energy<br />

Facility – 2006-2010. Annual Report, Nebraska Game and Parks Commission. 9pp.<br />

Warren, P. 2010. Black <strong>Grouse</strong> recovery in northern England. British Wildlife 21(6):383-391.<br />

Webster, L. M. I., L. V. Mello, F, Mougeot, J. Martinez-Padilla, S. Paterson, and S. B. Piertney. 2011.<br />

Identification of genes responding to nematode infection in Red <strong>Grouse</strong>. Molecular Ecology<br />

Resources 11:305-313.<br />

Webster, L. M. I., S. Paterson, F. Mougeot, J. Martinez-Padilla, and S. B. Piertney. 2011.<br />

Transcriptomic response of Red <strong>Grouse</strong> to gastro-intestinal nematode parasites and testosterone:<br />

implications for population dynamics. Molecular Ecology 20:921-931.<br />

Wegge, P., and J. Rolstad. 2011. Clearcutting forestry and Eurasian boreal forest grouse: Long term<br />

monitoring of sympatric Capercaillie Tetrao urogallus and Black <strong>Grouse</strong> T. tetrix reveals unexpected<br />

effects on their population performances. Forest Ecology and Management 261:1520-1529.<br />

Whiting, J. C., M. Morales, J. Handy, and K. Edwards. 2010. Ecological assessment of Sage <strong>Grouse</strong> in<br />

the area surrounding T-24 and T-25. Report prepared for CH2M-WG Idaho, LLC. Subcontract<br />

00732290. S. M. Stoller Corporation, Idaho Falls, Idaho. 9pp.<br />

Willebrand, T., M. Hornell-Willebrand, and L. Asmyhr. 2011. Willow <strong>Grouse</strong> bag size is more sensitive<br />

to variation in hunter effort than to variation in Willow <strong>Grouse</strong> density. Oikos XXX:XXX-XXX.<br />

(online early).<br />

35


<strong>Grouse</strong> <strong>News</strong> 41 <strong>News</strong>letter of the <strong>Grouse</strong> Group<br />

Wilson, S., and K. Martin. 2011. Life-history and demographic variation in an alpine specialist at the<br />

latitudinal extremes of the range. Population Ecology XXX:XXX-XXX (online early). (White-tailed<br />

Ptarmigan).<br />

Wolfe, D. H., M. A. Patten, and L. C. Larsson. 2010. Status, distribution, and ecology of White-tailed<br />

Ptarmigan (Lagopus leucura) in the Sangre de Cristo Mountains, New Mexico. Final Report.<br />

Submitted to New Mexico Department of Game and Fish. Contract Number 10-516-0000-00018.<br />

15pp.<br />

Yang, C., Y. Fang, and Y.-H. Sun. 2011. Winter space use and social behaviors of Chinese <strong>Grouse</strong><br />

(Bonasa sewerzowi) at Lianhuashan mountains, Gansu, China. Journal of Ornithology 152:297-305.<br />

36


<strong>Grouse</strong> <strong>News</strong> 41 <strong>News</strong>letter of the <strong>Grouse</strong> Group<br />

ERRATUM<br />

Error in the article on black grouse in issue 40<br />

In the paper Population ecology of black grouse on north-east Scottish moorland in 1956–82 by<br />

Adam Watson (<strong>Grouse</strong> <strong>News</strong> 40: 6-13) an error has been found in the results, heading breeding success.<br />

On page 11 in the paragraph after Table 7, first line, “correlated negatively” should be “correlated<br />

positively”, as in the summary, and the negative sign in front of the r value is incorrect and should be<br />

deleted. The paragraph should be as follows: Breeding success of greyhens was strongly correlated<br />

positively with total June rainfall (n = 5, r = 0.973, P = 0.0054, adjusted R 2 = 0.928). The incorporation of<br />

June mean temperature or the number of June rain days reduced the proportion of variation accounted for<br />

in a multiple regression.<br />

37


<strong>Grouse</strong> <strong>News</strong> 41 <strong>News</strong>letter of the <strong>Grouse</strong> Group<br />

SNIPPETS<br />

The effect of climate change on grouse populations in Norway<br />

Different species of grouse and vole may have peak population after peaks in the seed crop of bilberry<br />

Vaccinium myrtillus because of reduced levels of feeding deterrents in bilberry plants. In this paper we<br />

predicted that grouse reproduction may depend also on temperatures in June–September in the 2 previous<br />

years, because bilberry plants will be less exhausted after a high seed crop in or after warm summers, and<br />

thus rebuild their chemical defence more quickly. After peak years of bilberry, the populations of<br />

capercaillie Tetrao urogallus and bank vole Myodes glareolus in southern Norway were negatively<br />

related to summer temperatures in the previous year or previous 2 years. In five areas in Norway chick<br />

production in willow ptarmigan Lagopus lagopus was negatively related to summer temperatures in the 2<br />

previous years. Densities of capercaillie and black grouse Tetrao tetrix were more likely to peak in vole<br />

peak years at high altitudes in eastern Norway in the autumn, where summer temperatures are low. The<br />

paper concludes that high summer temperatures may limit grouse reproduction through the effect on<br />

bilberry plants and that a warm climate thus adversely affects population levels of grouse.<br />

Selås, V., Sonerud, G.A., Framstad, E., Kålås, J.A., Kobro, S., Pedersen, H.B., Spidsø, T.K. and Wiig, Ø.<br />

2010. Climate change in Norway: warm summers limit grouse reproduction. - Population Ecology<br />

53: 361-371.<br />

Tor Kristian Spidsö, Editor <strong>Grouse</strong> <strong>News</strong>, TKS.<strong>Grouse</strong>@gmail.com<br />

Amazing Species required<br />

Rachel Roberts<br />

Dear All<br />

Many of you last year kindly assisted me in contributing to the profiles of threatened species for daily<br />

publication on the new IUCN Species of the Day website. The website was very successful and we<br />

finished the end of the year with a dedicated following of over 4,000 users on the social networking site<br />

Twitter. We also attracted interest from a UK publishing company, which is now producing a wonderful<br />

coffee table book of all of last year‟s profiles which will be available later this year.<br />

On the back of this success we have kept the website on, but under the new name of „Amazing<br />

Species‟. As I am now working on this alone, the profiles are weekly instead of daily but the format is<br />

still exactly the same. http://www.iucnredlist.<strong>org</strong>/amazing-species.<br />

I would be extremely grateful if I could ask for your support again this year, and to nominate one or<br />

two threatened species that you wish to see profiled on the website. We would prefer the species to be in<br />

any of the RL categories, but if you are in a group lacking verified assessments then please do not let this<br />

prevent you nominating species. View this as a great way to raise the profile of your species, as we do get<br />

lots of visits to the site and are frequently told how interesting and useful it is especially as an education<br />

tool.<br />

As I am now running this single-handedly, it would be wonderful if you could assist me by writing the<br />

short text required. But, if this is not feasible, then please just send me the names of the species you wish<br />

to profile and hopefully I will get around to writing it for you to review. I also need a high resolution<br />

photo and permission granted to use that photo. Thank you so much for your ongoing support on this, it is<br />

hugely appreciated.<br />

Instructions for Amazing Species text – 170 words:<br />

Intro: Scientific and common name and Red List category if it has one, and distribution and range<br />

with a brief description. Example: Delacour‟s Langur, Trachypithecus delacouri, is listed as „Critically<br />

Endangered‟ on the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species TM . Found only in north-central Vietnam,<br />

Delacour‟s Langur is one of the rarest and most threatened primates on Earth.<br />

Middle Paragraph: Threats to the species.<br />

End Paragraph: Conservation measures being undertaken or that should be undertaken.<br />

Rachel Roberts, Executive Assistant IUCN Species Survival Commission, The Innovation Centre,<br />

University of Bath, Carpenter House, First Floor, Broad Quay, Bath, BA1 1UD, UK,<br />

sscchairoffice@iucn.<strong>org</strong>. http://www.iucnredlist.<strong>org</strong>/species-of-the-day.<br />

38


<strong>Grouse</strong> <strong>News</strong> 41 <strong>News</strong>letter of the <strong>Grouse</strong> Group<br />

Japanese rock ptarmigan<br />

Japanese rock ptarmigan Lagopus muta japonica (Photos Hiroshi Nakamura)<br />

39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!