The Hemiptera is an ancient insect order, demonstrating extraordinary life histories and highly specialized morphological adaptations, as they have exploited diverse habitats and food sources through over 300 million years of their evolution. Hemiptera is one of the Big Five insect orders (with Coleoptera, Diptera, Lepidoptera and Hymenoptera), the most diversified and speciose orders among all insects, the largest non-holometabolous order of insects, representing approximately 7% of metazoan diversity. The Hemiptera currently contains around 320 extant and extinct families, which is the highest number among all insect orders1, with over 110,000 species already described2,3,4. The order Hemiptera is subdivided into six suborders1—extinct Paleorrhyncha (archescytinoids), Sternorrhyncha (modern aphids, scale insects, whiteflies, jumping plantlice, and their extinct relatives), Fulgoromorpha (planthoppers), Cicadomorpha (cicadas, froghoppers, leafhoppers, treehoppers, and number of extinct groups), Coleorrhyncha (moss bugs) and Heteroptera (true bugs).

Representatives of the Sternorrhyncha are tiny sucking phytophagous insects, representing nearly 19,000 described extant and extinct species distributed worldwide. They are highly diverse morphologically and ecologically, containing several extant infraorders Aphidomorpha, Coccidomorpha, Aleyrodomorpha) and Psyllodea, as well as extinct ones Naibiomorpha and Pincombeomorpha1,4. Both the fossil record from Moscovian of Avion5 and molecular divergence estimation6 show that the group was present during the Carboniferous. Sternorrhyncha have been evolving and diversifying for over 300 million years, but their fossils are less numerous than fossils of euhemipteran lineages (Fulgoromorpha, Cicadomorpha, Coleorrhyncha, and Heteroptera).

The consensus is that the Sternorrhyncha are a monophyletic lineage, but their internal classification is still an object of debate. Their sedentary lifestyles coupled with phloem-feeding behaviours in these insects, which behave as plant parasites, have driven morphological reductions and losses, neotenous females, extreme sexual dimorphism, and convergently derived morphological characters that would otherwise be useful in phylogenetic analyses. Thus, reconstructing the relationships of Sternorrhyncha is rather challenging. While Aphidomorpha and Coccidomorpha seem to be closely related, the placement of Naibiomorpha remains disputed. This group was placed within Aphidomorpha8 or in Coccidomorpha9. The Pincombeomorpha seems to form a distinct lineage together with Aphidiformes (i.e. Aphidomorpha + Naibiomorpha + Coccidomorpha). The second clade of Sternorrhycha—Psylliformes contains Aleyrodomorpha with Aleyrodidae and Psylloidea, the latter recently united with Protopsyllidioidea as Psyllodea1. Grimaldi10 stated that Protopsyllidiidae, which was once placed in Pincombeoidea11, should be placed as a sister group of all remaining Sternorrhyncha. However, in that analysis, representatives of the other extinct sternorrhynchan groups such as Pincombeomorpha and Naibioidea (Naibiomorpha) were not included. As a result of all these proposals, Psyllodea, as recently recognised1, seems to be a paraphyletic group and Protopsyllidiidae are not deemed to be direct ancestors of Psylloidea12. Recently, the morphological features, taxonomic content and classification of Protopsyllidioidea were reanalysed and a new hypothesis of their relationships was proposed, with Protopsyllidiidae as sister group to the Psylloidea + Aleyrodoidea clade13. Drohojowska14 postulated that Liadopsyllidae could be a sister group to the Psylloidea + Aleyrodoidea clade, based on morphological analysis of extant and extinct taxa.

The fossils described below are so morphologically remote and disparate from the other extinct and extant groups, that they cannot be placed in any of already proposed groups. They can be recognised as sternorrhynchan insect, based on characters of the head, thorax and wing venation. This motivated us to apply a phylogenetic approach to resolve the systematic position of the studied fossils.

Results

Phylogenetic analysis

We conducted Bayesian Inference (BI) and Maximum Parsimony (MP) analyses using morphological data to place the fossil taxa and resolve the relationships within Sternorrhyncha. Therefore, we mainly included those morphological characters that were also discernible in the fossils that were selected. The data matrix used for the analysis consisted of 10 taxa (Fulgoromorpha taken as an outgroup, and 9 Sternorrhyncha ingroups, including extinct groups, see Supplementary information 1 Table S1) and 42 characters (see Supplementary information 1 Table S2). The characters were treated as non-additive and unordered. The list of characters and the nexus file containing the character matrix is available in Appendix (Tables S1 and S2).

The detailed results of phylogenetic analyses are presented in the Appendix. Both phylogenetic methods (MP and BI) were highly congruent in their resultant topologies (Supplementary information 1 Figs S1, S2a–c). According to the resulting phylogenies, the fossil described below forms a group of its own (Fig. 1), included in a clade of Psylliformes, related to Psyllodea and Aleyrodomorpha, but deserving of recognition as a different infraorder.

Figure 1
figure 1

Phylogenetic position of Dingla shagria gen. sp. nov. on most parsimonius tree. Numbers at nodes represent posterior probabilities and bootstrap values. Image of planthopper Pyrops candelaria: Max Pixel Public Domain CC0 (modified); pincombeid Pincombea sp. redrawn from46; male scale insect: Pavel Kirillov CC-BY-SA2.0 (modified); Coccavus supercubitus redrawn from46; aphid Macrosiphum rosae: Karl 432 CC-BY-SA4.0 (modified); protopsyllidiid Poljanka hirsuta redrawn from47; liadopsyllid Liadopsylla apedetica redrawn from48; whitefly Aleyrodes proletella: Amada44 CC-BY-SA4.0 (modified); psyllid Trioza urticae photo by Jowita Drohojowska.

Full size image

Systematic palaeontology

Order Hemiptera Linnaeus, 1758.

Suborder Sternorrhyncha Amyot et Audinet-Serville, 1843.

Clade Psylliformes sensu Schlee, 1969.

Dinglomorpha Szwedo & Drohojowska infraord. nov

Diagnosis

Fore wing with costal veins complex carinate (Pc carinate as in Psylliformes), ScP present as separate fold at base of common stem R + MP + CuA (unique character); common stem R + MP + CuA weakened at base (unique character); areola postica reduced (homoplasy with Aleyrodoidea); clavus present, with single claval vein A1. Hypandrium present as small plate (as in Psylliformes).

Dingloidea Szwedo & Drohojowska superfam. nov

Diagnosis

Fore wing membranous with modified venation—veins thickened, areola postica reduced; antennae 10-segmented; 3 ocelli present; stem MP present, connected with RP and CuA; abdomen widely fused with thorax; no wax glands on sternites.

Dinglidae Szwedo & Drohojowska fam. nov

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:D0A1C785-62D3-4E07-9A3B-FFAE3C13B704.

Type genus Dingla

Szwedo et Drohojowska gen. nov.; by present designation.

Diagnosis

Imago. Head with compound eyes narrower than thorax. Eyes entirely rounded, postocular tumosity present; lateral ocelli placed dorsolaterally, near anterior angle of compound eye in dorsal view, median ocellus present. Antennae 10-segmented, with bases in frons to compound eyes, rhinaria scarce (?). Pronotum in mid line longer than mesopraescutum. Fore wing with thickened costal margin, basal portion of stem R + MP + CuA weak, distal portion of stem R + MP + CuA convex, forked at about half of fore wing length, branch RA short; pterostigmal area thickened. Common stem MP + CuA short, branches RP, MP and CuA parallel on membrane. Rostrum reaching metacoxae. Metacoxa without meracanthus. Metadistitarsomere longer than metabasitarsomere, claws distinct, long and narrow, no distinct additional tarsal structures. Male anal tube long. Hypandrium in form of small plate, styli long, narrow and acutely hooked at apex.

Dingla Szwedo & Drohojowska gen. nov

LSID urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:5053D386-4A13-445C-8036-9C69D885561F.

Type species Dingla shagria

Szwedo et Drohojowska sp. nov.; by present designation and monotypy.

Etymology

The generic name is derived from the adjective ‘dingla’ meaning ‘old’ in Jingpho language, which is spoken in Kachin state where the amber originates from. Gender: feminine.

Diagnosis

Vertex in mid line about as long as wide between compound eyes. Frons flat, widely triangularly incised at base. Antenna with 10th antennomere longer than penultimate one, widened, membranous apically, with terminal concavity. Pronotum about twice as wide as long. Mesopraescutum narrow, about as wide as pronotum; mesoscutum wide, with scutellar sutures not reaching anterior margin; mesoscutellum widely pentagonal. Fore wing with branch R forked anteriad of branch MP + CuA forking. Tip of clavus at level of MP + CuA forking. Hind wing with terminals RP and M subparallel and weakened in apical portion. Metafemur not thickened, metatibia without apical spines.

Dingla shagria Szwedo & Drohojowska sp. nov

LSID urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:3EA05FB0-B783-4D7A-98EA-10B02F50B83D (Figures 2, 3).

Figure 2
figure 2

Dingla shagria gen. sp. nov., holotype male, No. MAIG 5,979: body in dorsal view (a); body in ventral view (b); drawing of body in dorsal view (c); drawing of head in ventral view with clypeus (d); fore wing (e); apical antennomere (f); antennomeres 6th—10th (g); head in dorsal view (h); head in ventral view (i); head in lateral view (j); male genitalia in dorsal view (k); male genitalia in ventral view (l); male genitalia in lateral view (m); scale bars: 0.5 mm a, b, c, e; 0.1 mm f, g, k, l, m; 0.2 mm j, h, i; 0.25 mm d.

Full size image
Figure 3
figure 3

Dingla shagria gen. sp. nov., paratype male, No. MAIG 5,980: body in dorsal view (a); body in ventral view (b); head in ventral view with median ocellus (c); paratype male, No. NIGP172398, body in dorsal view (d); body in ventral view (e); fore tibia (f); paratype male, No. NIGP172399 body in dorsal view (g); body in ventral view (h); mid leg (i); hind leg (j); scale bars: 0.5 mm a, b, g, h, j; 0.4 mm d, e, f; 0.2 mm c; 0.25 mm i.

Full size image

Etymology

The specific epithet is derived from the noun ‘shagri’ meaning ‘insect’ in Jingpho language spoken in the Kachin State, when the amber was collected.

Material

Holotype male. MAIG 5979, Paratype male, MAIG 5980, deposited in Museum of Amber Inclusions, Laboratory of Evolutionary Entomology and Museum of amber Inclusions, Department of Invertebrate Zoology and Parasitology, Faculty of Biology, University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland; paratype male NIGP172398, paratype male NIGP172399, deposited in Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, China.

Locality and horizon

Kachin amber, Noije Bum hill, Hukawng Valley, Kachin State, northern Myanmar. Terminal Aptian/earliest Cenomanian.

Diagnosis

Pedicel (2nd antennomere) elongate, slightly thickened, 3rd antennomere longer than second and 4th; antennomeres 4th to 8th subequal in length. Protibia with row of thin setae in apicad half. Probasitarsomere about half as long as prodistitarsomere. Subgenital plate small, subquadrate, parameres long and narrow, parallel; about 3 times as long as wide at base, with hooked acute apex. Male anal tube tubular, slightly widening apicad, merely shorter than parameres.

Description

Male. Measurements (in mm): Total length 1.76 to 2.13; Body length total (including claspers) 1.76–2.13; Head including compound eyes width 0.37–0.52; head length along mid line 0.18–0.24; vertex width 0.2–0.26; Forewing length 1.32–1.79; forewing width 0.62–0.74; Claspers length 0.2–032; Antennomere 1st 0.04–0.08; antennomere 2nd 0.8–0.13; antennomere 3rd 0.08–0.16; antennomere 4th 0.06–0.12; antennomere 5th 0.06–0.09; antennomere 6th 0.06–0.1; antennomere 7th 0.06–0.09; antennomere 8th 0.0–0.09; antennomere 9th 0.06–0.09; antennomere 10th 0.0.8–0.01; Profemur + protrochanter cumulative length 0.26–0.46; protibia length 0.29–0.34; probasitarsomere length 0.06–0.09; prodistitarsomere length 0.08–0.13; mesofemur + mesotrochanter cumulative length 0.3–0.4; mesotibia length 0.36–0.4; mesobasitarsomere length 0.05–0.1; mesodistitarsomere length 0.13–015; metafemur + metatrochanter cumulative length 0.39–0.56; metatibia length 0.5–0.68; metabasitarsomere length 0.1–0.15; metadistitarsomere length 0.1–0.18.

Vertex about half as long as width of head with compound eyes; slightly narrower than wide at base; disc of vertex slightly concave; sutura coronalis absent. Scapus cyllindrical, longer than wide, pedicel slightly longer than scapus, barrel-shaped, wider than 3rd antennomere. Antennomere 3rd longer than 2nd antennomere (pedicel) antennomeres 5th to 9th subequal in length; antennomere 9th with subapical rhinarium; antennomere 10th (apical) longer then penultimate one, spoon-like widened apically, with rhinarium placed subapically. Median and lateral ocelli visible from above. Compound eyes large, not divided, with distinct, non-differentiated ommatidia; postocular protuberances narrow. Frons convex, with distinct triangular, concave median portion; median ocellus at margin with vertex; postclypeus and apical portion of loral plates distinctly incised to frons; postclypeus about twice as long as wide; anteclypeus tapering ventrad; lora semicircular, long, with upper angles slightly below upper margin of postclypeus, lower angles not exceeding half of anteclypeus length. Rostrum with apex reaching metacoxae; scapus short, wide, placed in distinct anterolateral concavity.

Pronotum large, as long lateral as in midline; about 2.6 times as wide as long in mid line; disc of pronotum convex; anterior margin convex, slightly protruding between compound eyes; posterior margins converging posteriad; posterior margin slightly concave. Mesopraescutum with anterior margin covered by pronotum, with anterior margin convex, lateral margins expanded posterolaterad, with posterior margin convex posteriomediad, slightly concave posterolaterad. Mesoscutum distinctly wider than long in mid line; anterior margin merely concave medially, lateral margins distinctly diverging posteriad, posterolateral angles acute, distinct, posterior margin W-shaped, with distinct median concavity; disc of mesoscutum convex with indistinct longitudinal concavities (apodemes? sutures?). Mesoscutellum narrow, with anterior margin acutely convex, lateral margins subparallel, posterior margin straight, disc of mesoscutellum concave, with posteromedian furrow. Metascutum and metascutellum not visible.

Fore wing about 2.5 times as long as wide; narrower at base, widening posteriad, rounded in apical margin; widest at ¾ of its length. Costal margin thickened, veins thick, distinctly elevated; basal portion of stem R + MP + CuA weak, distal portion of stem R + MP + CuA convex, forked at about half of forewing length, branch RA short; pterostigmal area thickened; common stem MP + CuA short, branches RP, MP and CuA parallel on membrane; areola postica absent; clavus present, with apex exceeding half of forewing, with single claval vein A1.

Hind wing about 0.8 times as long as forewing, with costal margin with two groups of regularly dispersed setae, basal group with seven longer and stiff setae and median group with 10 shorter, stout setae; terminals RP and M subparallel and weakened in apical portion.

Profemur and mesofemur subequal in length; protibia slightly shorter than mesotibia; pro- and metadistitarsomeres slightly longer than pro- and mesobasitarsomeres. Metacoxa without meracanthus; metafemur longer than pro- and mesofemur; metatibia distinctly longer than pro- and mesotibia; metadistitarsomere distinctly longer than metabasitarsomere; tarsal claws long, narrow, without arolium or empodium.

Abdomen with segments III to VIII almost homonomic in length, widely connected to thorax, subgenital portion narrowing. Subgenital plate small, subquadrate, parameres long and narrow, parallel; about 3 times as long as wide at base, with hooked acute apex. Male anal tube tubular, slightly widening apicad, merely shorter than parameres.

Discussion

Dinglomorpha infraord. nov. forms a distinct group, nested within a clade of Psylliformes, related to Aleyrodomorpha: Aleyrodoidea and Psyllodea: Psylloidea, but deserving to be separated as a different infraorder (Figs. 1, 4). This new infraorder seems to be closer related, in terms of its morphological features, to Psylliformes, the group containing Protopsyllidioidea, Aleyrodomorpha, extinct Liadopsyllidae and modern Psylloidea. Dinglomorpha infraord. nov. shares some features with Aleyrodomorpha, e.g. the general structure of head capsule, retention of antennal processus terminalis, membranous mesoscutellum, well developed mesopostnotum, and in fore wing venation reduction of areola postica. Dinglomorpha presents a combination of unique features, such as vein ScP present as separate fold at the base of common stem R + MP + CuA and base of this stem weakened (this feature is autapomorphic for the group and not observable in any other Sternorrhyncha). The presence of 10 antennal segments (antennomeres) seems to be a very conservative feature, as a reduction of the number of antennomeres is the general morphological tendency observed in various sternorrhynchans15. The presence of a median ocellus directed anteriorly seems to be a symplesiomorphic condition retained in some basal sternorrhynchans, e.g. in Jurassic Liadopsyllidae, Cretaceous genera Yamis Drohojowska & Szwedo, 2015 and Shapashe Drohojowska & Szwedo, 2015 (Aleyrodidae), or Cretaceous Postopsyllidiidae10,11,13,16.

Figure 4
figure 4

Chronophylogram of the main Sternorrhyncha lineages, based on the results of present analyses.

Full size image

The general structure of the head capsule in Dingla gen. nov. partly resembles the pattern observed in Psylloidea, with a narrow frontal portion incised between enlarged genae17. On the other hand, the well developed postclypeus and anteclypeus, with large mandibular plates (lora), and bases of antennae placed distinctly in front of compound eye resemble the pattern present in Aleyrodidae18. The antennae of Dingla gen. nov. have rhinaria on the ultimate and penultimate antennomeres, which is different than in other Psylliformes. In Psylloidea rhinaria are present subapically on each of antennomeres 2, 4, 6, and 7, in the Aphalarinae, rhinaria are also present on antennomeres 3rd and 5th19, in Protopsyllididae rhinaria seems to be distributed on antennomeres 3rd to 10th. It is not clear in Postopsyliididae and Permopsyllididae11,13, but it is most probably the same as in Protopsyllididae. In recent species of Aleyrodidae, rhinaria are usually present on antennomeres 3rd, 5th, and 7th20, however, multiple rhinaria are known in extinct Gapenus rhinariatus Drohojowska & Szwedo, 2013 from the Lower Cretaceous Lebanese amber21.

The pronotum in Dingla gen. nov. is relatively large, most similar to the state in Postopsyllidium Grimaldi, 2003 (Postopsyllidiidae; see13). In general appearance it is similar to the pronotum observed in other Psyllodea, however it is larger than in Psylloidea and Aleyrodoidea14,17,18. The mesopraescutum in Dinglomorpha infraord. nov. is narrow, partly covered by the posterior portion of the pronotum. In Aleyrodoidea the mesopraescutum is not covered by the pronotum, with the posterior margin angulate, incised to the mesoscutum14,18. In general appearance it is most similar in shape to the the mesocutum in Psylloidea14. The mesopraescutum is poorly known in Protopsyllidioidea. It is relatively small, diamond shaped and with the anterior portion covered under the pronotum in Postopsyllidium Grimaldi, 200313. The mesoscutum of Dingla gen. nov. is quite large, as in Psylloidea and Aleyrodidae, but has a deep posterior incision in which the mesoscutellum is incised with its anterior portion. In Aleyrodidae the mesoscutellum is short, membranous, and its median portion could be incised in posterior margin of mesoscutum18,21,22,23,24,25. The well-developed mesopostnotum is present in Dingla gen. nov. and Aleyrodidae, while it is not as distinct in Psylloidea14,17. The metascutum, metascutellum and metapostnotum in Dingla gen. nov. are poorly visible, probably less developed in comparison to Psylloidea or Aleyrodoidea14,17,18.

Venation of the fore wing in Dinglomorpha infraord. nov. is very peculiar. The costal margin is thickened, with carinate Pc, as in remaining Psyllodea. The costal break, characteristic of Psylloidea is missing here, however, the veins of costal complex are at least partly included in thickened ambient vein—this vein is well developed in Psylloidea. The structure of the basal portion of the fore wing in Dinglomorpha is very unusual—the basal portion of veins R + MP + CuA is weakened, with ScP separated as fold. The median portion of R + MP + CuA complex presents traces of independence of stem R and stem MP + CuA, the fork of this stem is placed basal of claval apex, stem R produces single RA and much longer RP. The homologisation of the second branch is uncertain—from the topographic position on the wing it seems more probable that it is an MP stem, and that CuA, with its fork (delimiting the areola postica), is reduced. A similar reduction of areola postica is observed in Aleyrodidae, but in whiteflies the MP stem is also reduced (weak or absent in extinct Bernaeinae; see26,27), or absent in Aleyrodinae and Aleurodicinae23.

The early stages of Sternorrhyncha evolution are not well understood, which is reflected in doubts and incongruences in their classification hypotheses based on morphological, palaeontological and molecular data (Fig. 4). The classification and nomenclatorial history of the Sternorrhyncha is very complex28 (see also Supplementary information 1). The division of the Sternorrhyncha into two independent lineages was already postulated by Börner29, leading to opinions of non-monophyletic (diphyletic) status of the suborder26. Those proposals result from palaeontological observations and interpretations of the independent origins of aphids + scale insects lineage and jumping plantlice + whiteflies lineage, as well as inclusion of Paleorrhyncha (paraphyletic Archescytinoidea) within Sternorrhyncha12.

Morphological characters supporting the monophyly of the Sternorrhyncha comprises the rostrum tightly attached to chest, mesonotum divided into sclerites (unknown state in Pincombeomorpha), and reduced (in vast majority) veinlet cua-cup at base of fore wing. Development of the stigmal area in Pincombeomorpha and Aphidomorpha + Naibiomorpha appears to be homoplastic, however this feature could be a local synapomorphy of this lineage. Numerous morphological details of extinct Pincombeomorpha are poorly known. In most cases only isolated wings are available as sources of data. Regarding venational patterns, Pincombeidae seems to be more similar to the Aphidomorpha + Coccidomorpha lineage30,31. The analysis of head and thorax structures presented by Wegierek32 shows that the Aleyrodomorpha displays a set of apomorphies which are not found in other groups of Sternorrhyncha, and these features place Aleyrodomorpha as a sister group to other sternorrhynchans, but in an unresolved position with regards to Euhemiptera (Supplementary information 1 Fig. S4d). Molecular studies are incongruent with the fossil record and morphological analyses, postulating Sternorrhyncha as a monophylum (Supplementary information 1 Fig. S3a–c), a sister group to remaining hemipterans1. Molecular studies often place Aleyrodomorpha as sister group to other Sternorrhyncha33,34,35, while results of morphological analyses suggest Aleyrodomorpha as a sister group to Psyllodea14,36. See also Supplementary information 1 for more detailed comments on relationships within the Sternorrhyncha.

The oldest fossils ascribed to the Sternorrhyncha were recently reported from the Moscovian (Carboniferous) locality of Avion in Pas-de-Calais Basin, France5. This finding pushes back the history of the group (Fig. 4) and challenges the hypothesis of their direct descendance from the Paleorrhyncha Archescytinoidea, which are known from the Asselian (earliest Permian) as previously proposed26,32.

The fossil record of particular sternorrhynchan lineages and their diversification, palaeodiversity and palaeodisparity is very uneven (see Supplementary information 1). Early diversity of Psyllodea comprises various Protopsyllidioidea, which went extinct by the late Cretaceous13. Jurassic diversity of modern Psylloidea and Aleyrodoidea is poorly documented, however their diversification might have been hampered by competition from other sternorrhychans and phloem-feeders radiating at these times (planthoppers and some true-bugs). Jurassic Liadopsyllidae present many plesiomorphic conditions, suggesting that these insects were still very generalized in their morphology and not highly disparate, as observed among other sternorrhynchans. The morphology of the Aleyrodidae adults is also rather conservative and not highly disparate as we can observe from the Jurassic and Cretaceous fossils25,27. The evolutionary shift in the morphological disparity of whiteflies (their puparia, in fact) is most probably related to mid-Cretaceous biosphere reorganization37, resulting in the change of host plants from gymnosperms to angiosperms and co-radiation with them. The evolutionary scenario of Dinglomorpha infraord. nov. was probably also affected by these and, as result, these insects could be endemic to the mid-Cretaceous biota of Kachin amber forests, as has been observed among other insects7. The distinctness of Dinglomorpha infraord. nov. could be a result of their long, alas so far undocumented, evolutionary history on the West Burma terrane or even Gondwanaland. The geological history of this terrane is very complex38,39,40. The West Burma terrane (West Burma block) separated from Australia in the Late Jurassic41,42. The placement of West Burma Block in the Cretaceous is a subject of numerous discussions42, and the question of whether West Burma was originally a part of Sibumasu or a part of the Lhasa Block still remains open. Various interpretations of tectonics led to a complex series of various palaeobiogeographic scenarios, relating the Burmese amber fauna with Gondwanan elements43,44. On the other hand, numerous groups known from slightly older Palaeoasian fossil sites are present among Kachin amber inclusions as well7. Among the Sternorrhyncha families, there is no clear distributional pattern; families distributed more widely in the Lower Cretaceous to the times of Kachin amber formation, as well as families known so far exclusively from Kachin amber were reported. Aphids of the families Burmitaphididae, Juraphididae, Szelegiewicziidae and Tajmyraphidiidae are reported from several Lower Cretaceous fossil sites. Only the family Parvaverrucosidae is unique for Kachin amber. The scale insect families Coccidae, Hodgsonicoccidae, Margarodidae, Matsucoccidae, and Xylococcidae are known from various Lower Cretaceous sites, while Cretaceous records of Kozariide, Ortheziidae, Pseudococcidae, and Weitschatidae are unique from Kachin amber. Postopsyllidiidae are known from Kachin amber and from Turonian Raritan amber of New Jersey (U.S.A.). Aleyrodidae were reported from Lower Cretaceous Lebanese amber and Mongolia, and from Kachin amber as well. Dinglidae fam. nov. (Dinglomorpha infraord. nov.) for the moment are exclusively known from Kachin amber. Morphological disparity of Dinglomorpha, clearly separating this lineage from the other relatives, together with its limited distribution, could support the Gondwanan influence on the composition of the Kachin amber inclusions.

Conclusions

We described a new genus and species, representing a peculiar and disparate sternorrhynchan lineage, known so far only from Kachin amber. It extends the range of the known taxonomic diversity and morphological disparity of Sternorrhyncha. Its morphological characters led to the placement of Dinglomorpha as separate infraorder, sister to Aleyrodomorpha (Psylliformes). The morphological disparity of Dinglomorpha could be due to their isolation and separate evolutionary history on the West Burma terrane, which seems to have been influenced by ecological pressures and challenges related to the local biota. The features and fate of the fossils preserved in Kachin amber were shaped by major ecological changes during the Cretaceous, making Dinglomorpha an example of a highly specialized, short-lived lineage of the Sternorrhyncha.

The results of the first phylogenetic analysis of all sternorrhynchan groups, which is presented here, confirmed the monophyly of Sternorrhyncha, revealed Pincombeomorpha as a sister group to the remaining lineages, and supported the hypothesis of separating them into two clades – Aphidiformes and Psylliformes. The finding described above gives additional insight into the systematics, diversity and disparity of the Sternorrhyncha. The palaeoecology of the new group seems to be related to tropical habitats of the West Burma terrane, at least since the time of its separation from Australia in the Late Jurassic. Dinglomorpha could be one of the groups of Gondwanan origin and therefore the finding is also important for understanding the palaeobiogeography and the evolutionary history of the fauna of the Kachin amber forest.

Material and methods

The studied specimens are inclusions in mid-Cretaceous amber from Burma (Myanmar). Two specimens were collected by Mr. Patrick Müller, and acquired by the Museum of Amber Inclusions, University of Gdańsk (MAIUG) and two more come from the collection of Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (NIGPAS). Specimens were cut, grinded and polished for better visibility.

The specimens were examined, photographed and measured using the Leica M205C, Nikon SMZ1500, Nikon SMZ1270, Nikon Eclipse E600 and Zeiss Axio.Imager digital microscopes platforms, with incident and transmitted light were used simultaneously as well as with fluorescent illumination. The illustrations were prepared with two image-editing software packages (CorelDraw X9, CorelPaintX9). Fourier Transform Infrared Spectra (Supplementary information 1 Fig. S3a-h) were obtained in the Amber Laboratory of the International Amber Association in Gdańsk, for the reasons and according to procedure proposed by Szwedo and Stroiński45.

Phylogenetic analyses were performed according to procedures described in Supplementary information 1. Matrix file is presented as Supplementary information 2.