Next Article in Journal
The Effect of Exogenous Lysozyme Supplementation on Growth Performance, Caecal Fermentation and Microbiota, and Blood Constituents in Growing Rabbits
Previous Article in Journal
Influencing Elimination Location in the Domestic Cat: A Semiochemical Approach
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sett Use, Density and Breeding Phenology of Badgers in Mediterranean Agro-Sylvo-Pastoral Systems
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 12
Issue 7
10.3390/ani12070898
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Badger Meles meles as Ecosystem Engineer and Its Legal Status in Europe

by
Przemysław Kurek
1,*,
Łukasz Piechnik
2,
Blanka Wiatrowska
3,
Agnieszka Ważna
4,
Krzysztof Nowakowski
4,
Xosé Pardavila
5,
Jan Cichocki
4 and
Barbara Seget
2
1
Department of Plant Ecology and Environmental Protection, Adam Mickiewicz University, Uniwersytetu Poznańskiego 6, 61-614 Poznań, Poland
2
Functional and Evolutionary Ecology Group, W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, Lubicz 46, 31-512 Cracow, Poland
3
Department of Forest Botany, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 71D, 60-625 Poznań, Poland
4
Department of Zoology, Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Zielona Góra, Szafrana 1, 65-516 Zielona Góra, Poland
5
Sorex Ecoloxia e Medio Ambiente S.L., Rúa das Barreiras 80/2, 15702 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2022, 12(7), 898; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12070898
Submission received: 10 February 2022 / Revised: 17 March 2022 / Accepted: 25 March 2022 / Published: 31 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Badger Ecology and Conservation)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The European badger, listed in Bern Convention (protected fauna species), is also known as an important ecosystem engineer that creates new microhabitats among its setts suitable for the establishment of many plant and animal species. Badger setts are areas with topsoil disturbance and hence are places with higher species diversity than undisturbed surroundings. Much new data concerning the importance of badgers in ecosystem engineering indicates that the way badger populations are managed in Europe should be reconsidered. Thus, the aim of this study was to review the impact of badgers on shaping of species diversity in forest ecosystems with special attention to their legal status across Europe. The badger is hunted on 69.3% of the continent for 1.5–12 months per year. The real problem with management of this species concerns a quarter of its range in Europe, where the species can be hunted in winter and spring during mating season and during parturition. Reducing the hunting season to a maximum of three months in late autumn (September to November) seems to be a better approach. To prevent the negative effects of overhunting, special attention should be paid to population monitoring.

Abstract

The European badger plays an important role as a natural factor shaping species diversity in forests. Its extensive setts can be used by many other animals as shelters. Soil perturbations in their setts support plant communities that differ from the matrix landscape. The badger is also an effective seed disperser. We investigated its role as an ecosystem engineer in preserving species diversity and discussed its legal status across Europe. In most European countries (69.3% of the continent), the badger is hunted, sometimes year-round. The hunting season lasting through winter until early spring may have a negative effect on badger populations, especially when cubs are born in February. Although this species is Red Listed in 19 European countries (with categories ranging from LC to EN), the badger is strictly protected by law in 30.7% of its European range. A reduction in badger populations may limit its ecosystem services (seed dispersal, topsoil disturbances, microhabitat creation). Much new data on the importance of badgers in ecosystem engineering has allowed us to reconsider how we manage badger populations.

1. Introduction

Natural disturbances driving species diversity in European temperate forests (mostly coniferous monocultures) are limited to the primeval or protected forests and are very rare in managed forests. Small-scale disturbances in managed forests are under strict control so that gaps, uprooted trees, or rotten logs can be largely avoided [1]. As a result, European forests have lost their naturalness and diversity but still have a great potential for rewilding [2]. In a great part of Europe, the diversity of plants and animals demanding natural disturbances in forests can be increased by the activity of keystone species such as burrowing mammals. This guild seems to be one of the few remaining natural disturbance agents, causing changes in plant and animal communities and enhancing diversity in the forest floor [3,4]. The best example is the European badger, Meles meles, one of the most widespread medium-sized carnivores on the continent [5], and are known for digging extensive burrows, or setts, which vary considerably in internal structure and use [6], and may cover a large area of the forest floor [7,8].
The European badger is a common and widespread species [9,10]. Badgers play an important part in various interspecific interactions depending on their diet, behaviour, prey-predator interactions, disease dispersal, etc. [5,11,12,13,14]. Badger-human relationships can be quite ambivalent due to some damage, e.g., in farmlands or infrastructure [15,16]. It is not commonly known that badger can also be considered ecosystem engineers, acting as a relevant natural factor in shaping species diversity. Extensive and durable setts may be used by many other animals as safe breeding sites or temporary shelters [17,18,19]. Badgers are also effective seed dispersers of fleshy-fruited plants [20,21]. Small-scale local disturbances caused by such semi–fossorial mammals can substantially influence ecosystem structure and functioning. Perturbations (topsoil perturbations) support plant communities that differ qualitatively and quantitatively from the matrix landscape [3]. Some authors reported that topsoil disturbance by digging in temperate habitats has a positive impact on soil properties [22], and therefore setts, are places of higher diversity of vascular plants [3,23,24,25,26,27], bryophytes [4], oribatid mites [28] and other invertebrates [29,30].
Natural processes (seed dispersal and topsoil mixing) initiated by badgers seem to be strongly limited due to many factors associated with these animals, such as landscape transformation [31,32], road accidents [33,34,35,36], natural causes (e.g., interspecific killing [37], diseases [38], intra– and interspecific competition [39,40]) and hunting [41,42]. Beside road accidents and natural mortality causes, hunting may be a relevant additional factor that reduces the number of badgers and disturbs their population functioning [43]. In general, natural factors are beyond our control, but we can reduce the negative effect of some anthropogenic factors. However, it is impossible to exclude them completely (e.g., collisions, poaching) from the environment. Only hunting can be truly controlled. In Europe, the need to control hunting of badgers is being considered, as reflected in (protected fauna species) of the Bern Convention, where the badger is mentioned. Moreover, much of the new data on the badger as an ecosystem engineer can provide the basis for future reconsideration of its legal status in Europe. The aim of this study was to review the impact of badgers on shaping species diversity in forest ecosystems, with special attention to their legal status in European countries.

2. Data Collection

Data on the legal status of the badger in Europe were searched for using Google Scholar (key words: badger, protection, legal status, list of protected species) and websites presenting current law in national languages (sources presented in Table 1). We cited papers, legal documents, websites, and personal correspondence–especially when the law required interpretation and explanation. Countries where badgers are absent (Cyprus, Iceland, Malta) were excluded from consideration (see [44]). The Caucasus, the Asian part of Turkey and the European part of Russia were also excluded from the analysis. Data were gathered until 30 June 2020. On this basis, we distinguished three status categories presented in Table 1: P = badger protected all year round, H = hunted within a hunting season, and U = unclear, where the badger is considered as a game species, not hunted but also not protected. Similarly, other data were collected, such as badger’s presence in a national red book/list and some explanatory information when hunting law was regulated in autonomous regions. As there are no general data on hunting bags in Europe, we gathered them from websites and reports with national statistics published by hunting societies. If no data were found, we contacted wildlife managers and other administrative staff who had access to the data. A similar procedure was followed for the estimation of the hunting season duration. For federations with regionally regulated hunting laws, Figure 1 presents the minimal and maximal hunting season (Austria, France, Germany, Switzerland; see also Table 1). For the analysis presented in the map in Figure 2, countries with hunting season regulated only regionally were classified according to the hunting season that prevails at the state’s area (Austria). Other federal countries (France, Germany, and Switzerland) were classified according to the general hunting season as their overriding federal law stated. For the analysis presenting the percentages of areas in Europe with different hunting seasons (pie chart in Figure 2), more detailed regional data were used for all federal countries (see Table 1).

3. European Badger as Ecosystem Engineer

3.1. Interaction with Soil and Plants

Badgers interact with other ecosystem components in the following two ways: (1) by spreading seeds [119,120] and (2) inducing changes in chemical and physical properties of the topsoil among setts, thereby creating favourable conditions for colonisation by various plants and animals [3].
The European badger markedly affects physical and chemical soil properties, the local relief of the forest floor, and the species richness of other groups of organisms [3,6,121]. Its impact is due to the long-term habituation of extensive setts, which can cover an area of up to 970 m2 [8], where the volume of excavated soil can reach up to 28 m3 [121]. This is why old burrows are distinguished by a different surface shape than their surroundings. The soil of mounds is characterized by increased pH (mounds: 5.5; reference areas: 4.3) and higher concentrations of nutrients, including Ca (more than thrice) and Mg (almost twice) in comparison to undisturbed soil [3]. Mounds of dug soil from deeper horizons containing less organic matter have low carbon and nitrogen content. Higher availability of phosphorus has been reported on the mounds, which may be associated with higher pH [3].
Long-term use of setts and permanent topsoil mixing and changes in chemical and physical properties lead to an increase in plant species richness, in comparison to undisturbed surroundings [3,27]. Soil digging by badgers results in the appearance of ruderal plants associated with unstable environments and tolerating disturbances, such as Urtica dioica [25]. The presence of this group of plants suggests that the increased species richness within the setts is significantly related to the disturbance and consequent nutrient enrichment of the topsoil. Similar observations apply to bryophytes as follows: on average, 9.5 species were found in the setts, 4.5 of them in undisturbed soil [4]. Moreover, 38.5% of species occurring exclusively on burrows were identified as epiphytic bryophytes on the bark of fleshy-fruited shrubs growing mostly on badger burrows. It means that there is also a secondary effect of diversity shaping by burrowing badgers [4]. Topsoil disturbance plays a vital role in shaping plant diversity and is mainly manifested by the reduction of competition from dominant species and the creation of survival opportunities for young plants. Beneficial changes in soil chemistry (higher pH and nutrients content) are an additional disturbance effect used by plants [44].
In addition, badgers eat fleshy fruits of many plant species, as seeds of at least 13 species were found in the faeces of this carnivore [21]. The role of the badger in seed dispersal is repeatedly emphasized, especially for species producing large fruit, e.g., pears Pyrus sp., as its seeds cannot be easily eaten and dispersed by birds [119]. Seeds from fruit eaten by badgers are deposited in latrines, which are located on the territory boundary and in the vicinity of setts. As a result, we can observe a greater species richness of fleshy-fruited trees and shrubs near old burrows that have been exploited for many years [3].

3.2. Interactions with Fauna

The badger interacts with other animals in many different ways. As a predator, it naturally interacts with its prey populations [122] and plays an important role in trophic interactions, e.g., in mechanisms of mesopredator release [11]. Sometimes it becomes prey for other carnivores [123]. An interesting aspect of interactions with other mammals is the sharing of burrows, e.g., with the raccoon dog, Nyctereutes procyonoides, the red fox, Vulpes vulpes, the golden jackal, Canis aureus, the crested porcupine, Hystrix cristata, or the Egyptian mongoose, Herpestes ichneumon [18,19,23,25,124,125,126,127]. Badger setts can also serve as shelter for many other animals. For example, in the Albera Massif in Spain, many of the Greek tortoises Testudo hermanni, survived a forest fire hidden in badger setts [128]. Moreover, fire salamander Salamandra salamandra in the Polish Carpathians was recorded in badger setts [43]. Little is known about invertebrates that find shelter inside the setts or inhabit the soil within them. Hancox [17] in his review mentioned 89 species of arthropods found in badger burrows, representing beetles Coleoptera (61 species), flies Diptera (18 species), butterflies Lepidoptera (one species—Noctua pronuba) and mites Acarina (8 species).
Badgers may gather lots of organic material in chambers when building their nest for winter torpor and rearing cubs. Nest material can exceed a volume of 37 dm3 [6]. Such accumulation of organic matter creates ideal conditions for many saprotrophic invertebrates, including mites (Acari). Sixteen species of Uropodina mites were recorded in badger nests [29]. Two of them, Trematura patavina and Nenteria oudemansi, were represented by all developmental stages there (protonymphs, deutonymphs, and adults of both sexes), in contrast to the Uropodina mite community from nests of other fossorial mammals, e.g., moles, Talpa europaea [29]. These results showed that badger nests are potential habitats for many saprobiontic taxa that enhance species and niche diversity in ecosystems.
Soil-dwelling fauna also benefits from topsoil mixing in badger setts, where higher species richness is observed in comparison to intact soils in their surroundings. Oribatida communities differed both qualitatively and quantitatively as follows: 52 species were found in the soil of old burrow mounds, compared to 36 species from reference plots [28]. Moreover, mounds of excavated soil were inhabited by 20 species of oribatid mites, which were not found anywhere else outside the mounds. Thus, badgers create new microhabitats (mounds of excavated soil) that shape species richness and differentiate the communities of soil-dwelling fauna in their setts. Such differences may persist for a long time, even after the hosts have abandoned the setts. Badgers may dig and use more burrows within their territories [129], thus, their impact on forest floor diversity is spatially extensive, not limited only to main setts.

4. The Legal Status of Badger across Europe

In over half of the continent, badgers are considered game species, in some cases with hunting seasons of up to eight months per year or no protection period at all (Table 1). The shortest known hunting season of 2–3 months applies in Ukraine, Czechia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia and some parts of Germany, covering 21.2% of Europe excluding Russia. A slightly longer hunting season, extending into late autumn and early winter, has been adopted in Croatia, Kosovo and Slovenia. There is also a group of countries where the hunting season is longer, extending to winter and early spring (Figure 1). Hunting in winter may have a negative effect on badger populations, especially when the young are born in February. This is the main argument that badger hunting should be forbidden for most of the year, including periods of parturition and rearing cubs. This applies to a group of countries where the hunting season extends into February or March (Bulgaria, Estonia, Finland, France, Hungary, Latvia, Romania, Serbia) or where it continues throughout the year (Steiermark in Austria, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern and Sachsen In Germanyy, Bosnia and Herzegovina). The legal status of this species varies widely in countries composed of autonomous regions and may depend on the law adopted in particular regions at a particular time. For example, in federal countries (Austria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Germany, Switzerland, France), the legislation of individual regions takes precedence over federal law and has a different, usually longer, hunting season. As a result of different approaches to badger hunting presented in many European countries, the protection period is very short or may not even exist in some parts of the continent (Figure 1).
According to the IUCN Red List, the European badger is in the LC (least concern) category [130,131]. However, the species is mentioned in Red Data Books/Red Lists of animals in 19 European countries where it is simultaneously protected (Belarus, Denmark, Spain, Italy, Portugal) or hunted (Austria, France, Czechia, Kosovo, Norway, and Slovakia) [49,51,67,79,96,102,107]. Its classification as LC prevails (n = 14) in most European countries, but in the following others the threat category is higher: VU in Flanders (Belgium), Murcia (but LC in other parts of Spain), Belarus and Slovakia or even EN in Albania (Table 1).
Badgers are classified as protected species in several countries (Albania, Andorra, Belarus, Denmark, United Kingdom, Ireland, the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, Spain, and Portugal, Figure 2). An intermediate situation occurs in Italy, Moldova, North Macedonia, and Greece, where its status is unclear, as it is not subject to species protection and, at the same time it is not a game species and, de jure, it cannot be hunted. However, legal protection of the badger may have some exceptions, and this does not always mean that the species is not hunted at all. In Great Britain and Ireland, badger protection can be waived as part of the fight against bTB [132].
Relative to the area of Europe, the species is protected by law (or at least not hunted) in 30.7% of the range analysed in this study (Figure 2). In 27.3% of the area of Europe, hunting is permitted during a very long hunting season of more than half a year (from late summer to late winter) that covers the time when females are just before or during parturition. Badgers are still hunted year-round in at least 2.1% of the study area (Figure 2). In reality, this percentage is even higher as some countries with shorter overall hunting seasons have recognised exceptions to this rule and badger hunting has been allowed all year round, i.e., in regions where capercaillie Tetrao urogallus, black grouse Lyrurus tetrix, hazel grouse Tetrastes bonasia and partridge Perdix perdix breed (Poland, Czechia) or close to human settlements and hen farms (Sweden) (Table 1). Thus, it is impossible to estimate the actual proportion of the year-round hunting season. No official data are available, but sometimes such hunting (against so-called pests) comes close to extermination. Moreover, our unpublished data show that in many regions of Europe, with developed hunting traditions, badgers are poached even if hunting is forbidden by law (Poland, Spain). Thus, in reality, the badger hunting bag and species extermination are higher than we could expect from direct calculations.
All the information presented above confirm that more attention should be paid to the situation/management of badgers, especially in large-area countries where long hunting seasons and high hunting bag coincide with other factors negatively affecting badger populations, e.g., roadkills. There are, therefore, several high-risk countries in Europe where long hunting seasons can significantly disturb badger populations. This is primarily the case in countries with hunting seasons longer than 3 months (Table 1).

5. Protection of Badger Setts

Badger setts play a crucial role in the ecology of the species, so some authors emphasized that special attention should also be paid to the protection of setts [52,133], where these animals spend much of their lives. Badger burrows have only been legally protected in the following European countries: Albania, Belgium, the Netherlands, United Kingdom, and Ireland [134]. Allowing badgers to be hunted with dogs during excavation and destruction of burrows is a serious threat. This is a widely accepted practice, e.g., in France and Sweden (Table 1). Another problem is observed in some areas of Spain, where it is allowed to hunt red foxes in burrows. As a result, it also generates a threat to badgers protected by law, which are killed “inadvertently” when their sett is confused with a red fox den. Therefore, setts/burrows should be protected even if a species is hunted, as in Polish hunting legislation, where all burrows are protected [135]. In Estonia, on the other hand, where badger is also a game species, large dens with more than ten entry holes are also protected [65]. Such a solution seems to be the right approach to badger conservation, especially when some authors report that badgers are sensitive to sett disturbance [136].

6. Trends

In Europe, badgers reach widely varying densities and numbers (Table 2). In southern Europe, the species is considered rare, e.g., in some regions of Spain [137]. In northern Italy, it was almost eradicated and thus species reintroduction has begun [138]. Reintroduction has also been attempted in the Netherlands [139]. The badger is not uncommon in Europe, although we cannot be sure of its population status as there are no reliable data. In fact, the low density of badgers in some regions may not only be the result of habitat capacity but simply the effect of intensive poaching [42].
Since the late 1990s [41,42], the hunting bag of this species has increased rapidly almost all over Europe ([150], Table 3). European countries can be divided into groups according to hunting bag size, which is a result of different areas and badger population densities. There are countries with a very high hunting bag increases, e.g., in Poland, almost 18-fold, but still with a relatively low yearly acquisition, not exceeding 10,000 individuals (also in Czechia, Slovakia, Estonia, and Switzerland). The situation seems to be different In Germanyy, where the hunting bag is also increasing, with a very high yearly acquisition (Table 3). In Germanyy, since the end of sett gassing, the annual hunting bag has increased from less than 5000 in the 1960s and 1970s to 79,900 individuals in 2018–19 [73,151].
However, there are many reports stating that badger populations are increasing in different parts of Europe (e.g., [161]), especially when hunting is suspended, but data on population trends expressed in numbers of individuals are scarce. Over a 9-fold increase in the badger population was observed in the Netherlands from 1983–2001 [139]. It should be noted that badgers have not been hunted in the Netherlands since 1994, and data sampling, started when there were almost no badgers in the environment. Between 1979 and 1995, an increase of 129% was reported in central Poland when hunting was curtailed [144]. An increase was also reported between 1992 and 2002, from nine to 27 families being placed under protection in Denmark [62]. Belgium also reported a 143% increase in badger populations (1988–1.15 ind/km2 and 1998–2.80 ind/km2), to a certain extent, as a result of full protection [162]. There is no information to confirm the real increase in population size basing on survey data. However, reports on hunting bag size alone seem to reveal a higher population increase than we could expect from the surveys. In general, hunting pressure is reducing badger populations rather than supporting their development [163].
The estimation of actual population trends based on game bag size can be misleading due to the possible impact of non-random variables, such as hunters’ preferences and tendencies, the increasing number of hunters, etc. [151]. However, such a practice of assessing population trends is common in many hunting societies in Europe. In fact, only sett surveys have given us the most reliable data on badger population trends, but such data are difficult to obtain and thus scarce. In western Europe, some authors reported an increase in population size after the extensive eradication by gassing of burrows in the 1960s and 1970s. In the Netherlands, badger populations started to grow when the species became protected by law [164]. The same situation applies to the following countries where the badger is protected: Luxembourg [86] and Spain [165]. There are some reports from regions that indicate an increase in population size [145,146] but under circumstances of suspended or limited hunting rather than its intensification. Excluding data based on the hunting bag, there is no report that reveals a strong population increase under hunting pressure.
Road mortality of badgers may provide some supplementary information on population trends, but there are usually no such data for longer periods, and in some cases, there has been no relationship between road accidents involving badgers and their population size [142]. Some authors report that, in general, the number of collisions with animals has increased in the last decades in Europe [166,167,168]. One of the reasons may be the increase in traffic, as well as animal population growth. In Switzerland, badger traffic casualties have increased by 113% between 1992 and 2015 [168], while the hunting bag has increased by 73% over a similar period (Table 3). Nevertheless, we still do not know whether the proportion between the hunting bag and the supposed population increase is correct. However, it seems that in some countries, these proportions are similar and distributed more reasonably. In western Poland, between 2010 and 2015, road mortality of badgers (excluding motorway opening effect) did not differ between years [169]. In relation to the data presented above, Poland belongs to a group of countries with very high hunting bag growth (Table 3). In line with country-dependent high hunting bag increases, there are no papers reporting an adequate increase of collisions with badgers greater than 100–200% in recent years [166,167,168,169]. Comparing these data with the rapidly and sharply increasing hunting bag, a question arises–is the badger population in some countries currently overhunted?
Hunting may constitute a significant share of the mortality of this species and cause its decline [12,145]. In the Carpathian Mountains in Poland, hunters obtain 0.37 badger/10 km2, while wolves kill 0.07 badger/10 km2 [43]. There are many indications that hunting negatively affects the badger population, as its size increases when hunting is limited [144]. Data from the Carpathian Mountains shows that as much as 65% of young badgers are killed annually as a result of hunting [43]. In northern Italy, the species has virtually disappeared as a result of intensive hunting management [138]. A similar situation had been reported in Denmark before the badger became a protected species [163].

7. Conclusions

Our great challenge is to halt the disappearance of species and habitats [170], so the role of the European badger in the ecosystem needs to be looked at with particular attention. More research needs to be done to consider whether the approach to a game animal can guarantee the maintenance of ecosystem services such as microhabitat creation, seed dispersal, and diversity shaping. It seems that in this matter, the importance of this mammal is still being underestimated. The real problem with appropriate badger management concerns countries that allow this species to be hunted in winter and spring during the mating season and parturition. Such a solution is supported in about a quarter of its European range. The real solution seems to be the reduction of the hunting season to two (October–November) or up to three months in late autumn (September–November). However, following solutions from other European countries, such as strict protection, should not be excluded either. Another problem concerns countries with a very high hunting bag increase in recent decades. In order to prevent overhunting in such circumstances, special attention should be paid to population monitoring.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.K.; methodology, P.K.; investigation, P.K, Ł.P., B.W., A.W., K.N., X.P., J.C. and B.S.; formal analysis, P.K, Ł.P., B.W., A.W., X.P., J.C. and B.S.; writing—original draft, P.K, Ł.P., B.W., A.W., K.N., X.P., J.C. and B.S.; writing—review and editing: P.K, Ł.P., B.W., A.W., X.P. and B.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for help in data gathering to: Peter Adamik, Alessandro Balestrieri, Linas Balčiauskas, Dalibor Ballian, Joaquín Vicente Baños, Hubert Basle, Olivier Beck, Koen van den Berge, Sandro Casali, Duško Ćirović, Emmanuel Do Linh San, Ihor Dykyy, Morten Elmeros, Maurice La Haye, Miklós Heltai, Bledi Hoxha, Yorgos Iliopoulos, Oliver Keuling, Dražen Kotrošan, Miha Krofel, Saša Kunovac, Paula Laukkanen, Charlotte Marshall, Qenan Maxhuni, Dime Melovski, Iulia Miu, Victoria Nistreanu, Nahit Pamukoğlu, Venislava Racheva, Alberto García Rodríguez, Miguel Rosalino, Massimo Scandura, Jaap Schröder, Jordi Solà de la Torre, Nikica Šprem, Egle Tammeleht, Igor Trbojević, Tomasz Wiatrowski, Hans Vink. We also thank Mateusz Ciepliński and Robert M. Jurga for help in graph preparation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kapusta, P.; Kurek, P.; Piechnik, Ł.; Szarek-Łukaszewska, G.; Zielonka, T.; Żywiec, M.; Holeksa, J. Natural and human-related determinants of dead wood quantity and quality in a managed European lowland temperate forest. For. Ecol. Manag. 2020, 459, 117845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chapron, G.; Kaczensky, P.; Linnell, J.D.C.; von Arx, M.; Huber, D.; Andrén, H.; López-Bao, J.V.; Adamec, M.; Álvares, F.; Anders, O.; et al. Recovery of large carnivores in Europe’s modern human-dominated landscapes. Science 2014, 346, 1517–1519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Kurek, P.; Kapusta, P.; Holeksa, J. Burrowing by badgers (Meles meles) and foxes (Vulpes vulpes) changes soil conditions and vegetation in a European temperate forest. Ecol. Res. 2014, 29, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Kurek, P.; Cykowska-Marzencka, B. Badger Meles meles setts and bryophyte diversity: A newly found role for the game animal in European temperate forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 2016, 372, 199–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Roper, T.J. Badger; HarperCollins Publishers: London, UK, 2010; p. 386. [Google Scholar]
  6. Fischer, C.; Dunand, F. 3D topography and structure analysis of three European badger (Meles meles) setts from Western Switzerland. Wildl. Biol. Pract. 2016, 12, 26–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Matyáštík, T.; Bičík, V. Distribution and habitat selection of badger (Meles meles) in Northern Moravia. Acta Univ. Palacki. Olomuc. Fac. Rerum. Nat. Biol. 1999, 37, 77–88. [Google Scholar]
  8. Obidziński, A.; Pabjanek, P.; Mędrzycki, P. Determinants of badger Meles meles sett location in Białowieża Primeval Forest, northeastern Poland. Wildl. Biol. 2013, 19, 48–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chiatante, G.; Dondina, O.; Lucchelli, M.; Bani, L.; Meriggi, A. Habitat selection of European badger Meles meles in a highly fragmented forest landscape in northern Italy: The importance of hedgerows and agro-forestry systems. Hystrix Ital. J. Mammal. 2017, 28, 247–252. [Google Scholar]
  10. Piza-Roca, C.; van ’t Zelfde, M.; La Haye, M.J.J.; Jongejans, E.; Raes, N. European badger habitat requirements in the Netherlands–combining ecological niche models with neighbourhood analysis. Wild. Biol. 2018, 2018, wlb.00453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Trewby, I.D.; Young, R.; McDonald, R.A.; Wilson, G.J.; Davison, J.; Walker, N.; Robertson, A.; Doncaster, C.P.; Delahay, R.J. Impacts of removing badgers on localised counts of hedgehogs. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e95477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Piza Roca, C.; La Haye, M.J.J.; Jongejans, E. Environmental drivers of the distribution and density of the European badger (Meles meles): A review. Lutra 2014, 57, 87–109. [Google Scholar]
  13. Hounsome, T.; Delahay, R. Birds in the diet of the Eurasian badger Meles meles: A review and meta-analysis. Mamm. Rev. 2005, 35, 199–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pavlik, I.; Trcka, I.; Parmova, I.; Svobodova, J.; Melicharek, I.; Nagy, G.; Cvetnic, Z.; Ocepek, M.; Pate, M.; Lipiec, M. Detection of bovine and human tuberculosis in cattle and other animals in six Central European countries during the years 2000–2004. Vet. Med. 2005, 50, 291–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Wilson, C.J.; Symes, R.G. The Management of Problems Involving Badgers (Meles meles); Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food: London, UK, 1998; p. 29.
  16. Kontsiotis, V.J.; Vadikolios, G.; Liordos, V. Acceptability and consensus for the management of game and non-game crop raiders. Wildl. Res. 2020, 47, 296–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hancox, M. The nidicolous fauna of badger setts. Entomol. Mon. Mag. 1988, 124, 93–95. [Google Scholar]
  18. Sidorchuk, N.; Maslov, M.; Rozhnov, V. Role of badger setts in life of other carnivores. Stud. Ecol. Bioethicae 2015, 13, 81–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mori, E.; Menchetti, M.; Balestrieri, A. Interspecific den sharing: A study on European badger setts using camera traps. Acta Ethol. 2015, 18, 121–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fedriani, J.M.; Delibes, M. Seed dispersal in the Iberian pear, Pyrus bourgaeana: A role for infrequent mutualists. Écoscience 2009, 16, 311–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kurek, P. Consumption of fleshy fruit: Are central European carnivores really less frugivorous than southern European carnivores? Mamm. Biol. 2015, 80, 527–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kurek, P. Topsoil mixing or fertilization? Forest flora changes in the vicinity of badgers’ (Meles meles L.) setts and latrines. Plant Soil 2019, 437, 327–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Van Wijngaarden, A.; Van de Peppel, J. The Badger, Meles meles (L.) in the Netherlands. Lutra 1964, 6, 1–60. [Google Scholar]
  24. Stubbe, M. Zur Biologie der Raubtiere eines abgeschlossenen Waldgebietes. Z. Jagdwiss. 1965, 11, 73–102. (In Germany) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Neal, E.; Roper, T.J. The environmental impact of badgers (Meles meles) and their setts. Symp. Zool. Soc. 1991, 63, 89–106. [Google Scholar]
  26. Neal, E.; Cheeseman, C. Badgers; Poyser Natural History: London, UK, 1996; p. 271. [Google Scholar]
  27. Obidziński, A.; Kiełtyk, P. Changes in ground vegetation around badger setts and fox dens in the Białowieża Forest, Poland. Pol. Bot. Stud. 2006, 22, 407–416. [Google Scholar]
  28. Rola, K.; Kurek, P.; Skubała, P. Badger (Meles meles) disturbances affect oribatid mite (Acari: Oribatida) communities in European temperate forests. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2017, 121, 20–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kurek, P.; Nowakowski, K.; Rutkowski, T.; Ważna, A.; Cichocki, J.; Zacharyasiewicz, M.; Błoszyk, J. Underground diversity: Uropodina mites (Acari: Mesostigmata) from European badger (Meles meles) nests. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2020, 82, 503–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Myczko, Ł.; Kurek, P.; Tryjanowski, P.; Wiatrowska, B.; Jankowiak, Ł.; Mielczarek, Ł.; Sienkiewicz, P.; Rutkowski, T.; Ondrejkowá, A. Where to overwinter: Burrows of medium-sized carnivores as winter places for invertebrates in temperate environment. Ecol. Entomol. 2021, 46, 1177–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Byrne, A.W.; Fogarty, U.; O’Keeffe, J.; Newman, C. In situ adaptive response to climate and habitat quality variation: Spatial and temporal variation in European badger (Meles meles) body weight. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2015, 21, 3336–3346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. O’Brien, J.; Elliott, S.; Hayden, T.J. Use of hedgerows as a key element of badger (Meles meles) behaviour in Ireland. Mamm. Biol. 2016, 81, 104–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Davies, J.M.; Roper, T.J.; Shepherdson, D.J. Seasonal distribution of road kills in the European badger (Meles meles). J. Zool. 1987, 211, 525–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Clarke, G.P.; White, P.C.L.; Harris, S. Effects of roads on badger Meles meles populations in south-west England. Biol. Conserv. 1998, 86, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sleeman, D.P.; Davenport, J.; More, S.J.; Clegg, T.A.; Collins, J.D.; Martin, S.W.; Williams, D.H.; Griffin, J.M.; O’Boyle, I.O. How many Eurasian badgers Meles meles L. are there in the Republic of Ireland? Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 2009, 55, 333–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Balčiauskas, L.; Stratford, J.; Balčiauskienė, L.; Kučas, A. Importance of professional roadkill data in assessing diversity of mammal roadkills. Transp. Res. D Transp. Environ. 2020, 87, 102493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Palomares, F.; Caro, T.M. Interspecific killing among mammalian carnivores. Am. Nat. 1999, 153, 492–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Smith, G.C. The role of the Badger (Meles meles) in rabies epizootiology and the implications for Great Britain. Mamm. Rev. 2002, 32, 12–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kowalczyk, R.; Zalewski, A.; Jędrzejewska, B.; Jędrzejewski, W. Spatial organization and demography of badgers (Meles meles) in Bialowieza Primeval Forest, Poland, and the influence of earthworms on badger densities in Europe. Can. J. Zool. 2003, 81, 74–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Rotenko, I.; Sidorovich, V. Badger Meles Meles and Raccoon Dog Nyctereutes Procyonoides in Belarus. Population Studies with Implication for the Decline in Badgers; Chatyry Chverci: Minsk, Belarus, 2017; p. 166. [Google Scholar]
  41. Griffiths, H.I.; Thomas, D.H. The status of the badger Meles meles (L., 1758) (Carnivora, Mustelidae) in Europe. Mamm. Rev. 1993, 23, 17–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Griffiths, H.I.; Thomas, D.H. The Conservation and Management of the European Badger (Meles Meles); Nature and Environment 90; Council of Europe Publishing: Strasbourg, France, 1997; p. 82. [Google Scholar]
  43. Mysłajek, R.W.; Nowak, S.; Rożen, A.; Jędrzejewska, B. Factors shaping population density, demography and spatial organization of the Eurasian badger Meles meles in mountains–the Western Carpathians (Southern Poland) as a case study. Anim. Biol. 2012, 62, 479–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kurek, P.; Piechnik, Ł. Borsuk Europejski; Wydawnictwo Klubu Przyrodników: Świebodzin, Poland, 2017; p. 160. [Google Scholar]
  45. Për Mbrojtjen e Faunës Së Egër LIGJ Nr. 10 006, datë 23.10.2008 Për Mbrojtjen e Faunës Së Egër. Republika e Shqipërisë. Available online: https://www.vendime.al/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/PER-MBROJTJEN-E-FAUNES-SE-EGER-i-perditesuar.pdf (accessed on 30 June 2020). (In Albanian).
  46. Për Miratimin e Listës së Kuqe të Florës dhe Faunës së Egër të Shqipërisë, Miratuar nga Ministri i Mjedist me Urdhër nr. 1280, Datë 20.11.2013 Botuar në Fletoren Zyrtare Nr. 197, Datë 18.12.2013 [Minister’s Order no. 1280, Dated 20.11.2013 on Approval of the Red List of Wild Fauna and Flora of Albania]. Available online: http://extwprlegs1.fao.org/docs/pdf/alb144233.pdf (accessed on 30 June 2020). (In Albanian).
  47. Decret d’aprovació del Reglament d’espècies animals protegides. Butlletí Oficial del Principat d’Andorra. M.d.T.i.M. Ambient. Andorra la Vella. Available online: https://www.bopa.ad/bopa/025027/Documents/7F35A.pdf (accessed on 30 June 2020). (In Catalan).
  48. Jagdverbände Österreich. Available online: www.jagd-oesterreich.at/ueber-uns/landesjagdverbaende/ (accessed on 30 June 2020). (In Germany).
  49. Zulka, K.P.R. Rote Listen Gefährdeter Tiere Österreichs. Checklisten, Gefährdungsanalysen, Handlungsbedarf. Teil 1: Säugetiere, Vögel, Heuschrecken, Wasserkäfer, Netzflügler, Schnabelfliegen, Tagfalter; Böhlau-Verlag: Wien Köln Weimar, Austria, 2005; p. 156. (In Germany) [Google Scholar]
  50. Wiener Jagdgesetz Änderung. Gesetz, Mit Dem das Wiener Jagdgesetz (Gesetz Über Die Regelung des Jagdwesens) Geändert wird, Landesgesetzblatt Nr. LGBl. Nr. 65/2019. Stadt Wien. Available online: www.wien.gv.at/recht/landesrecht-wien/rechtsvorschriften/html/l9200000.htm (accessed on 30 June 2020). (In Germany).
  51. Kozlo, P.G. Barsuk Meles meles. Krasnaja Kniga Respubliki Belarus [The Red Book of the Republic of Belarus]. 2006. Available online: http://redbook.minpriroda.gov.by/animalsinfo.html?id=16 (accessed on 30 June 2020).
  52. Van den Berge, K. Badger conservation and fox hunting in Flanders (Belgium). Small Carniv. Conserv. 1997, 16, 31. [Google Scholar]
  53. Maes, D.; Baert, K.; Boers, K.; Casaer, J.; Criel, D.; Crevecoeur, L.; Dekeukeleire, D.; Gouwy, J.; Gyselings, R.; Haelters, J.; et al. De IUCN Rode Lijst van de zoogdieren in Vlaanderen; Instituut voor Natuur- en Bosonderzoek: Brussel, Belgium, 2014; p. 20. (In Germany) [Google Scholar]
  54. Richet, J. Etude du Régime Alimentaire du Blaireau Européen (Meles meles L.) en Wallonie; Mémoires de la Faculté des Sciences; Université de Liège: Liège, Belgique, 2017; p. 47. (In French) [Google Scholar]
  55. Vercayie, D.; Paquet, A.; Feys, S.; Willems, W.; Paquet, J.-Y. Zoogdierenatlas van Het Brussels Gewest. 2001–2017; Rapport Natuurpunt Studie 2017/39; Bruxelles Environnement–Leefmilieu: Brussel, Belgium, 2017; p. 20. (In Germany) [Google Scholar]
  56. Zakon o Lovstvu. Bro: 4/06 od 01022006g. v.i.š. Federalno Ministarstvo Poljoprivrede, Federaija Bosne i Hercegovine [Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Water Management and Forestry, Bosna and Herzegovina]. Službenim novinama Federacije Bosne i Hercegovine. Bosna and Herzegovina. Available online: http://aarhus.ba/sarajevo/images/docs/Zakon_o_lovstvu_4_06_FBiH.pdf (accessed on 30 June 2020).
  57. Zakon o Lovstvu Republike Srpske [Law on Hunting of the Republic of Srpska]. Službenom Glasniku Republike Srpske 01-965/09. š.i.v. Ministarstvo Poljoprivrede. Vlada Republike Srpske. Available online: https://lovcirs.com/zakon-o-lovstvu-republike-srpske/?pismo=lat (accessed on 30 June 2020).
  58. Legislation of Bulgaria. Правилник за прилагане на закoна за лoва и oпазване на дивеча [Rules for Implementation of the Law on Hunting and Conservation of Game], Приет с ПМС No. 151 oт 13.06.2001 г. Държавен вестник Република България [Republic of Bulgaria]. Available online: https://www.lex.bg/laws/ldoc/-12290559 (accessed on 30 June 2020).
  59. Pravilnik o Lovostaju. [Ordinance on hunting] Narodne Nowine NN 94/2019 nr 1848 M.p.D.o. Agriculture]. Republike Hrvatske, Zagreb. Available online: https://narodne-novine.nn.hr/clanci/sluzbeni/2019_10_94_1848.html (accessed on 30 June 2020).
  60. Vyhláška Ministerstva Zemědělství o Době Lovu Jednotlivých Druhů zvěře a o Bližších Podmínkách Provádění Lovu, č. 245/2002 Sb. M.z.M.o. Agriculture]. Česká Republika [Czech Republic]. Available online: https://www.zakonyprolidi.cz/cs/2002-245 (accessed on 30 June 2020). (In Czech).
  61. Anděra, M.; Hanzal, V. Červený seznam savců České republiky [The Red List of mammals of the Czech Republic]. Příroda 2017, 34, 155–176. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  62. Asferg, T.; Clausen, P.; Christensen, T.K.; Bregnballe, T.; Kuhlmann Clausen, K.; Elmeros, M.; Fox, A.D.; Haugaard, L.; Holm, T.E.; Laursen, K.; et al. Vildtbestande og Jagttider I Danmark: Det Biologiske Grundlag for Jagttidsrevisionen 2018; Aarhus Universitet, DCE-Nationalt Center for Miljø og Energi: Aarhus, Danmark, 2016; p. 140. (In Danish) [Google Scholar]
  63. Elmeros, M.; Baagøe, H.J.; Sunde, P.; Theilmann, J.; Vedel-Smith, C. Pattedyr [Mammals]. In Den Danske Rødliste; Moeslund, J.E., Ed.; Aarhus Universitet, DCE–Nationalt Center for Miljø og Energi: Aarhus, Denmark, 2019. (In Danish) [Google Scholar]
  64. Jahihooaeg Algab Eestis [Hunting Season in Estonia]. Available online: https://www.rmk.ee/metsa-majandamine/jahindus/jahikalender (accessed on 30 June 2020). (In Estonian).
  65. Looduskaitseseadus [Nature Conservation Act] RTI. Keskkonnaministeerium. Eesti Vabariigi parlament Riigikogu Tallinn, Republic of Estonia. 2004. Available online: https://www.riigiteataja.ee/en/eli/508112013010/consolide (accessed on 30 June 2020). (In Estonian).
  66. Muutoksia Ketun, Mäyrän, Peltopyyn, Teeren ja Muflonin Metsästysaikoihin. Available online: https://riista.fi/muutoksia-ketun-mayran-peltopyyn-teeren-ja-muflonin-metsastysaikoihin/ (accessed on 30 June 2020). (In Finnish).
  67. Mammifères de France Métropolitaine. La Liste Rouge des Espèces Menacées en France; UICN France, MNHN, SFEPM, ONCFS: Paris, France, 2017; p. 16. (In French) [Google Scholar]
  68. Arrȇté fixant des Périodes de Chasse du Gibier Sédentaire Pour la Campagne Cynégétique 2019/2020 Dans le Departement du Bas-Rhin et Autorisant le Tir de Nuit du Sanglier Jusqu’au 1 Fevrier 2020 Inclus. Direction Départementale des Territoires, Préfet Du Bas-Rhin. Strasbourg, République Française. Available online: http://www.oncfs.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/chasse-2019/dept67-Bas-Rhin-ouverture-fermeture-chasse-2019.pdf (accessed on 30 June 2020). (In French).
  69. L’Office Français de la Biodiversité. Dates D’ouverture de la Chasse Saison 2019–2020. Available online: https://ofb.gouv.fr/dates-douverture-de-la-chasse-saison-2019–2020 (accessed on 30 June 2020). (In French).
  70. Bundesjagdgesetz. Verordnung über Die Jagdzeiten Vom 2. April 1977 (BGBl. I S. 531), Die Zuletzt Durch Artikel 2 der Verordnung vom 7. März 2018 (BGBl. I S. 226) Geändert Worden ist. L.u.F. Der Bundesminister für Ernährung. Das Bundesministerium der Justiz und für Verbraucherschutz, Bundesrepublik Deutschland. 1977. Available online: www.gesetze-im-internet.de/jagdzeitv_1977/BJNR005310977.html (accessed on 30 June 2020). (In Germany).
  71. Bundesjagdgesetz in der Fassung der Bekanntmachung vom 29. September 1976 (BGBl. I S. 2849), das Zuletzt Durch Artikel 2 des Gesetzes vom 14. November 2018 (BGBl. I S. 1850) Geändert Worden ist. L.u.F. Der Bundesminister für Ernährung. Das Bundesministerium der Justiz und für Verbraucherschutz, Bundesrepublik Deutschland [Federal Ministry of Justice and Consumer Protection, Germany]. Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Available online: http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/bjagdg/BJNR007800952.html (accessed on 30 June 2020). (In Germany).
  72. Meinig, H.; Boye, P.; Hutterer, R. Rote Liste und Gesamtartenliste der Säugetiere (Mammalia) Deutschlands; Bundesamt für Naturschutz: Bonn, Germany, 2020; p. 17. (In Germany) [Google Scholar]
  73. Deutscher Jagdverband. Präsidium und Landesverbände. 2020. Available online: https://www.jagdverband.de/der-djv/praesidium-und-landesverbaende (accessed on 30 June 2020). (In Germany).
  74. Legakis, A.; Maragou, P. The Red Book of Endangered Animals of Greece; Greek Zoological Society: Athens, Greece; Legakis, Greece; Maragou, Greece, 2009; p. 528. [Google Scholar]
  75. 79/2004. (V. 4.) FVM Rendelet a vad Védelméről, a Vadgazdálkodásról, Valamint a Vadászatról Szóló 1996. évi LV. Törvény Végrehajtásának Szabályairól Agrárminisztérium [The Ministry of Agriculture] Hungary. Available online: https://net.jogtar.hu/jogszabaly?docid=a0400079.fvm (accessed on 30 June 2020). (In Hungarian).
  76. Wildlife Act Number 39 of 1976. Irish Statute Book (eISB). Ireland. Available online: http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/1976/act/39/enacted/en/print (accessed on 30 June 2020).
  77. Wildlife (Amendment) Act Number 38 of 2000. Irish Statute Book (eISB). Ireland. Available online: http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/2000/act/38/enacted/en/html (accessed on 30 June 2020).
  78. Marnell, F.; Kingston, N.; Looney, D. Ireland Red List No. 3: Terrestrial Mammals; National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government: Dublin, Ireland, 2009; p. 50.
  79. Rondinini, C.; Battistoni, A.; Peronace, V.; Teofili, C. Lista Rossa IUCN dei Vertebrati Italiani; Comitato Italiano IUCN e Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare: Rome, Italy, 2013; p. 56. (In Italian)
  80. Legge 11 Febbraio 1992, n. 157. Norme per la Protezione della Fauna Selvatica Omeoterma e per il Prelievo Venatorio. (G.U. 25 Febbraio 1992, n. 46-S.O. n. 41), Ministero della Giustizia, Italy. Available online: https://www.ambientediritto.it/Legislazione/Caccia/Legge157-1992.htm (accessed on 30 June 2020). (In Italian).
  81. Administrative Instruction MA-No. 11/2007 Concerning the Hunting Season. F.a.R.D. Ministry of Agriculture. Goverment of Kosova. Pristine, Republic of Kosovo. Available online: https://www.mbpzhr-ks.net/en/administrative-instructions/?dy=2007 (accessed on 30 June 2020).
  82. Ibrahimi, H.; Gashi, A.; Rexhepaj, D.; Zhushi Etemi, F.; Grapci Kotori, L.; Fehér, Z.; Bino, T.; Šerić Jelaska, L.; Mesaroš, G.; Théou, P.; et al. Red Book of Fauna of the Republic of Kosovo; Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning & Kosovo Institute for Nature Protection: Pristhina, Kosovo, 2019; p. 352.
  83. Latvijas Mednieku Asociācija. Medības Latvijā. Medību Kalendārs [Hunting Calendar]. Available online: https://www.latma.lv/lv/medibas-latvija/medibu-kalendars/ (accessed on 30 June 2020). (In Latvian).
  84. Verordnung vom 30. September 2003 über die Hege des Wildes, die Abschussplanung, -Durchführung und -Kontrolle sowie die Kostenregelung von Massnahmen der Wildschadenverhütung (Hegeverordnung; HegeV), Nr. 198, 922.011. Liechtensteinisches Landesgesetzblatt. Liechtenstein. Available online: https://www.gesetze.li/konso/pdf/2003198000?version=4 (accessed on 30 June 2020). (In Germany).
  85. Įsakymas dėl Medžioklės Lietuvos Respublikos Teritorijoje Taisyklių Patvirtinimo, 2010 m. Rugsėjo 15 d. Nr. D1-768. L.R.a. Ministro. Vilnius, Lithuania. Available online: https://e-seimas.lrs.lt/portal/legalAct/lt/TAD/TAIS.381154 (accessed on 30 June 2020). (In Lithuanian).
  86. Schley, L.; Schaul, M.; Roper, T.J. Distribution and population density of badgers Meles meles in Luxembourg. Mamm. Rev. 2004, 34, 233–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Wagner, T. Analyse der Vom Dachs (Meles meles) Verursachten Landwirtschaftlichen Schäden in Luxemburg; L.T. Agricole: Luxembourg, 2011; p. 155. (In Germany) [Google Scholar]
  88. Lege regnului animal. 1995. Republica Moldova Parlamentul Lege Nr. 439-XIII din 27-04-1995 Regnului Animal. Monitorul Oficial Nr 62–63 art 688. Chisinau, Republica Moldova. 1995. Available online: https://www.legis.md/cautare/getResults?doc_id=87631&lang=ro (accessed on 30 June 2020). (In Romanian).
  89. Zakon o Divljači i Lovstvu. Službenom Listu Crnoj Gori, br. 52/08 i 48/15 [Hunting Act of Montenegro]. Crna Gora. Available online: http://extwprlegs1.fao.org/docs/pdf/mne139648.pdf (accessed on 30 June 2020). (In Bosnian).
  90. Wet Natuurbescherming van 16 December 2015 [Nature Conservation Act]. Staatsblad. The Kingdom of the Netherlands. Available online: https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0037552/2020-01-01 (accessed on 30 June 2020).
  91. Huidige Beschermde Status van de das Dassenbescherming. 2020. Available online: https://www.dasenboom.nl/index.asp?pa_id=119 (accessed on 30 June 2020). (In Germany).
  92. Закoн за лoвствoтo, Службен весник на РМ, бр. 26 oд 24.02.2009 гoдина. Republic of Macedonia. Available online: http://arhiva.mzsv.gov.mk/files/Zakon_za_lovstvoto.pdf (accessed on 30 June 2020). (In Macedonian)
  93. Wiig, Ø.; Bjørge, A.; Isaksen, K.; Kovacs, K.M.; Swenson, J.E.; Syvertsen, P.O. Pattedyr (Mammalia). 2015. Available online: http://www.artsdatabanken.no/Rodliste/Artsgruppene/Pattedyr (accessed on 30 June 2020). (In Danish).
  94. Pedersen, H.C.; Follestad, A.; Gjershaug, J.O.; Nilsen, E. Statusoversikt for Jaktbart Småvilt; NINA Rapport; Norsk Institutt for Naturforskning: Trondheim, Norway, 2016; p. 144. (In Norwegian) [Google Scholar]
  95. Rozporządzenie Ministra Środowiska z dnia 16.03.2005 w Sprawie Określenia Okresów Polowań na Zwierzęta Łowne. Dz.U.2005.48.459. Minister Środowiska [The Minister of Environment]. Poland. Available online: http://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20050480459 (accessed on 30 June 2020). (In Polish)
  96. Cabral, M.J.; Almeida, J.; Almeida, P.R.; Dellinger, T.; Ferrand de Almeida, N.; Oliveira, M.E.; Palmeirim, J.M.; Queirós, A.I.; Rogado, L.; Santos-Reis, M. Livro Vermelho dos Vertebrados de Portugal; Instituto da Conservação da Natureza: Lisboa, Portugal, 2005; p. 660. (In Portuguese) [Google Scholar]
  97. Hipólito, D.; Guedes, D.; Cabecinha, D.; Serronha, A.; Grilo, C.; Santos-Reis, M.; Monterroso, P.; Carvalho, J.; Fonseca, C.; Pardavila, X.; et al. Drivers of sett site location by European badgers in Portugal. Biodivers. Conserv. 2018, 27, 2951–2970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Ordonanța de Urgență nr. 57/2007 Privind Regimul Ariilor Naturale Protejate, Conservarea Habitatelor Naturale, a Florei și Faunei Sălbatice. Monitorul Oficial, Partea I nr 442 din 29 Iunie 2007. Guvernul României: București, Romania. Available online: https://lege5.ro/Gratuit/geydqobuge/ordonanta-de-urgenta-nr-57-2007-privind-regimul-ariilor-naturale-protejate-conservarea-habitatelor-naturale-a-florei-si-faunei-salbatice (accessed on 30 June 2020). (In Romanian).
  99. Legge per la Salvaguardia Della Fauna Selvatica e L’attuazione del Piano Faunistico Venatorio, 12 Aprile 2007 N.52 Repubblica di San Marino. Available online: https://www.consigliograndeegenerale.sm/on-line/home/archivio-leggi-decreti-e-regolamenti/documento17023527.html (accessed on 30 June 2020). (In Italian).
  100. Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD)—The Fifth National Report Ministry of Territory and Environment, Naturalistic Centre, Office in Charge of the Management of Agricultural and Environmental Resources (UGRAA), Public Health Department-Protection of Natural and Built Environment San Marino. 2016. Available online: www.consrsm.eu/CBD-ENGLISH.pdf (accessed on 30 June 2020).
  101. Pravilnik o Izmenama i Dopuni Pravilnika o Proglašavanju Lovostajem Zašticenih Vrsta Divljači. Službeni Glasnik Republike Srbije broj 75 od 7 septembra 2016. Republic of Serbia. Available online: https://upravazasume.gov.rs/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Pravilnik-o-izmenama-i-dopuni-Pravilnika-o-proglasavanju-lovostajem-zasticenih-vrsta-divljaci.pdf (accessed on 30 June 2020). (In Serbian)
  102. Žiak, D.; Urban, P. Červený (Ecosozologický) zoznam cicavcov (Mammalia) Slovenska. In Červený Zoznam Rastlín a Živočichov Slovenska; [Red List of Plants and Animals of Slovakia]; Baláž, D., Marhold, K., Urban, P., Eds.; Centrum Ochrany Prirody a Krajiny: Banska Bystrica, Slovakia, 2001; pp. 154–156. (In Slovak) [Google Scholar]
  103. Vyhláška Ministerstva Pôdohospodárstva a Rozvoja Vidieka Slovenskej Republiky zo 16. Decembra 2013, 489/2013. The Slovak Republic. Available online: https://www.slov-lex.sk/pravne-predpisy/SK/ZZ/2013/489/ (accessed on 30 June 2020). (In Slovak).
  104. Uredba o Določitvi Divjadi in Lovnih Dob (Uradni list RS, št. 101/04 in 81/14) [Decree Determining Game Animals and Hunting Seasons]. V.R. Slovenije. Available online: https://www.uradni-list.si/glasilo-uradni-list-rs/vsebina?urlid=2004101&stevilka=4348 (accessed on 30 June 2020). (In Slovenian).
  105. Robledano Aymerich, F.; Calvo Sendín, J.F.; Hernández Gil, V. El Libro Rojo de Los Vertebrados de la Región de Murcia (SE España): Aplicación de las Categorías de la UICN a Escala Regional; Actas III Congreso de la Naturaleza de la Región de Murcia; ANSE: Murcia, Spain, 2004; pp. 279–286. (In Spanish) [Google Scholar]
  106. Ley 42/2007, de 13 de Diciembre, del Patrimonio Natural y de la Biodiversidad. Boletín Oficial del Estado núm 299, de 14/12/2007. Jefatura del Estado. Spain. Available online: https://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-2007-21490 (accessed on 30 June 2020). (In Spanish).
  107. Palomo, L.J.; Gisbert, J.; Blanco, J.C. Atlas y Libro Rojo de Mamíferos Terrestres de España; Dirección General para la Biodiversidad-SECEM-SECEMU: Madrid, Spain, 2007; p. 588. (In Spanish) [Google Scholar]
  108. Jaktförordning SFS Svensk Författningssamling 1987: 905. N. RSL. Sveriges Riksdag. Sweden. Available online: https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/jaktforordning-1987905_sfs-1987-905 (accessed on 30 June 2020). (In Swedish).
  109. Bundesgesetz über die Jagd und den Schutz Wildlebender Säugetiere und Vögel vom 20. Juni 1986 (Stand am 1. Mai 2017) (922.0). Die Bundesversammlung der Schweizerischen Eidgenossenschaft [Switzerland’s Federal Assembly]. Schweizerische Eidgenossenschaft. Available online: www.admin.ch/opc/de/classified-compilation/19860156/index.html (accessed on 30 June 2020). (In Germany).
  110. Fischer, C.; Do Linh San, E. European badger—Meles meles. In Atlas of Mammals of Switzerland and Liechtenstein; Graf, R., Fischer, C., Eds.; Haupt Verlag: Bern, Germany, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  111. Bundesamt für Umwelt BAFU. Sektion Wildtiere und Waldbiodiversität: Dachs. 2010–2019. Available online: www.jagdstatistik.ch/de/statistics (accessed on 30 June 2020). (In Germany).
  112. Karar. 2019. 2020–2021 Av Dönemi Merkez Av Komisyonu Kararı. Resmî Gazete, 23052019, no 18. T.v.O. Bakanlığından. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti [Republic of Turkey]. Available online: https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2019/06/20190621M1-1.pdf (accessed on 30 June 2020). (In Turkish)
  113. Закoн України Прo мисливське гoспoдарствo та пoлювання (Відoмoсті Верхoвнoї Ради України (ВВР), 2000, No. 18, ст. 132) [On Hunting Economy and Shooting]. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Available online: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1478-14 (accessed on 30 June 2020). (In Ukrainian)
  114. The Wildlife (Northern Ireland) Order 1985 No. 171 (N.I. 2). Northern Ireland Assembly. Northern Ireland. Available online: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/nisi/1985/171/contents (accessed on 30 June 2020).
  115. Protection of Badgers Act. UK Public General Acts 1992 c 51. United Kingdom. Available online: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1992/51/contents (accessed on 30 June 2020).
  116. Wildlife and Natural Environment (Scotland) Act 2011 asp 6. Acts of the Scottish Parliament. Scotland. Available online: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2011/6/part/7/enacted (accessed on 30 June 2020).
  117. Mathews, F.; Kubasiewicz, L.; Gurnell, J.; Harrower, C.; McDonald, R.; Shore, R. A Review of the Population and Conservation Status of British Mammals. A Report by the Mammal Society under Contract to Natural England; Natural Resources Wales and Scottish Natural Heritage; Natural England: Peterborough, UK, 2018; p. 701. [Google Scholar]
  118. Giesler, R.; Ares, E. Badger Culling in England; Briefing Paper 6837; House of Commons Library: London, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  119. Fedriani, J.M.; Wiegand, T.; Delibes, M. Spatial pattern of adult trees and the mammal-generated seed rain in the Iberian pear. Ecography 2010, 33, 545–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Suárez-Esteban, A.; Delibes, M.; Fedriani, J.M. Unpaved road verges as hotspots of fleshy-fruited shrub recruitment and establishment. Biol. Conserv. 2013, 167, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Coombes, M.A.; Viles, H.A. Population-level zoogeomorphology: The case of the Eurasian badger (Meles meles L.). Phys. Geogr. 2015, 36, 215–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Jędrzejewska, B.; Jędrzejewski, W. Predation in Vertebrate Communities: The Białowieża Primeval Forest as a Case Study, 1st ed.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1998; p. 452. [Google Scholar]
  123. Sidorovich, V.E.; Rotenko, I.I.; Krasko, D.A. Badger Meles meles spatial structure and diet in an area of low earthworm biomass and high predation risk. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 2011, 48, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Palomares, F. Use of an active badger sett by Egyptian mongooses, Herpestes ichneumon, in Southwest Spain. Z. Saugetierkunde 1991, 56, 119–120. [Google Scholar]
  125. Mysłajek, R.; Nowak, S.; Rożen, A.; Kurek, K.; Figura, M.; Jędrzejewska, B. Ecology of the European badger (Meles meles) in the Western Carpathian Mountains: A review. Wildl. Biol. Pract. 2016, 12, 36–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Penezić, A.Ž. Ishrana Šakala (Canis aureus L. 1758) na Području Srbije; Biološki Fakultet; Univerzitet u Beogradu: Belgrad, Serbia, 2016; p. 178. (In Serbian) [Google Scholar]
  127. Nowakowski, K.; Ważna, A.; Kurek, P.; Cichocki, J.; Gabryś, G. Reproduction success in European badgers, red foxes and raccoon dogs in relation to sett cohabitation. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0237642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Capalleras, X.; Budó, J.; Villardell, A.; Pfau, B. Testudo hermanni hermanni in the Albera Mountains, Catalonia, Northern Iberian Peninsula. Radiata 2013, 22, 4–34. [Google Scholar]
  129. Kowalczyk, R.; Zalewski, A.; Jędrzejewska, B. Seasonal and spatial pattern of shelter use by badgers Meles meles in Białowieża Primeval Forest (Poland). Acta Theriol. 2004, 49, 75–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Temple, H.J.; Terry, A. The Status and Distribution of European Mammals; Office for Official Publications of the European Communities: Luxembourg, 2007; p. 58. [Google Scholar]
  131. Kranz, A.; Abramov, A.V.; Herrero, J.; Maran, T. Meles Meles. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: E.T29673A45203002. 2016. Available online: https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/29673/45203002 (accessed on 30 June 2020).
  132. Natural England. Summary of 2019 Badger Control Operations. Available online: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/bovine-tb-summary-of-badger-control-monitoring-during-2019/summary-of-2019-badger-control-operations (accessed on 30 June 2020).
  133. Forestry Commission. Forest operations and badger setts. For. Pract. Guide 1995, 9, 1–24. Available online: https://www.forestresearch.gov.uk/research/forest-operations-and-badger-setts/ (accessed on 9 February 2022).
  134. Hancox, M. Badger conservation and legal protection. Small Carniv. Conserv. 1994, 11, 18. [Google Scholar]
  135. Ustawa z dnia 13 Października 1995. r. Prawo Łowieckie. Dz.U.1995.147.713. Hunting Law Act]. Z.N.i.L. Min. Ochrony Środowiska. Sejm Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej [Sejm of the Republic of Poland]. Available online: http://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU19951470713 (accessed on 30 June 2020). (In Polish)
  136. Sadlier, L.; Montgomery, I. The impact of sett disturbance on badger Meles meles numbers; when does protective legislation work? Biol. Conserv. 2004, 119, 455–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Revilla, E.; Palomares, F.; Fernández, N. Characteristics, location and selection of diurnal resting dens by Eurasian badgers (Meles meles) in a low density area. J. Zool. 2001, 255, 291–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Balestrieri, A.; Remonti, L.; Prigioni, C. Reintroduction of the Eurasian badger (Meles meles) in a protected area of northern Italy. Ital. J. Zool. 2006, 73, 227–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Van Apeldoorn, R.C.; Vink, J.; Matyáštík, T. Dynamics of a local badger (Meles meles) population in the Netherlands over the years 1983–2001. Mamm. Biol. 2006, 71, 25–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Kruuk, H.H.; Parish, T. Changes in the size of groups and ranges of the European badger (Meles meles L.) in an area in Scotland. J. Anim. Ecol. 1987, 56, 351–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Delahay, R.J.; Brown, J.A.; Mallinson, P.J.; Spyvee, P.D.; Handoll, D.; Rogers, L.M.; Cheeseman, C.L. The use of marked bait in studies of the territorial organization of the European badger (Meles meles). Mamm. Rev. 2000, 30, 73–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Macdonald, D.W.; Newman, C. Population dynamics of badgers (Meles meles) in Oxfordshire, U.K.: Numbers, density and cohort life histories, and a possible role of climate change in population growth. J. Zool. 2002, 256, 121–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Goszczyński, J. Fox, raccoon dog and badger densities in North Eastern Poland. Acta Theriol. 1999, 44, 413–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  144. Goszczyński, J.; Skoczyńska, J. Density estimation, family group size and recruitment in a badger population near Rogów (Central Poland). Misc. Zool. 1996, 19, 27–33. [Google Scholar]
  145. Zejda, J.; Nesvadbova, J. Habitat selection and population density of the badger (Meles meles) in Bohemia and Moravia. Folia Zool. 1983, 32, 319–333. [Google Scholar]
  146. Do Linh San, E. Ectoparasite categories of the Eurasian badger (Meles meles) in western Switzerland. Wildl. Biol. Pract. 2007, 3, 52–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Balestrieri, A.; Cardarelli, E.; Pandini, M.; Remonti, L.; Saino, N.; Prigioni, C. Spatial organisation of European badger (Meles meles) in northern Italy as assessed by camera-trapping. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 2016, 62, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Rodríguez, A.; Martin, R.; Delibes, M. Space use and activity in a Mediterranean population of badgers Meles meles. Acta Theriol. 1996, 41, 59–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. Rosalino, L.M.; Macdonald, D.W.; Santos-Reis, M. Spatial structure and land-cover use in a low-density Mediterranean population of Eurasian badgers. Can. J. Zool. 2004, 82, 1493–1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Kauhala, K. Paljonko Suomessa on Pienpetoja? Riista- Ja Kalatalouden Tutkimuslaitos: Helsinki, Finland, 2007; p. 18. (In Finnish) [Google Scholar]
  151. Keuling, O.; Greiser, G.; Grauer, A.; Strauß, E.; Bartel-Steinbach, B.; Klein, R.; Wenzelides, L.; Winter, A. The German wildlife information system (WILD): Population densities and den use of red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) and badgers (Meles meles) during 2003–2007. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 2011, 57, 95–105. (In Germany) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Kurek, P. Rola borsuka europejskiego Meles meles w ekosystemie jako argument za objęciem ochroną gatunkową w Pol-sce. Chrońmy Przyr. Ojczysta 2019, 75, 363–373. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  153. Anděra, M.; Červený, J. Šelmy (Carnivora). Velcí Savci v České Republice Rozšíření, Historie a Ochrana [Large Mammals in the Czech Republic Distribution History and Protection]; Národní Muzeum: Praha, Czech Republic, 2009; pp. 75–86. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  154. Česky Statisticky Uřad. Základní Údaje o Honitbách, Stavu a Lovu Zvěře–od 1. 4. 2018 do 31. 3. 2019. 2019. Available online: https://www.czso.cz/csu/czso/zakladni-udaje-o-honitbach-stavu-a-lovu-zvere-od-1-4-2018-do-31-3-2019# (accessed on 30 June 2020). (In Czech).
  155. Csányi, S.; Márton, M.; Köteles, P.; Lakatos, E.A.; Schally, G. Vadgazdálkodási Adattár–1960–2018/2019; Országos Vadgazdálkodási Adattár: Gödöllő, Hungary, 2019; p. 24. (In Hungarian) [Google Scholar]
  156. Veeroja, R.; Männil, P. Status of Game Populations in Estonia and Proposal for Hunting in 2016; Estonian Environment Agency: Tallinn, Estonia, 2016; p. 108. [Google Scholar]
  157. Paulenka, J. Zhodnotenie ochrany a polovníckeho obhospodarovania jazveca na Slovensku. Folia Ven. 2001, 30–31, 273–294. (In Slovak) [Google Scholar]
  158. Národné Lesnícke Centrum. Poľovnícka Štatistická Ročenka Slovenskej Republiky 2018 [Hunting Statistical. Yearbook of the Slovak Republic 2018]; Štatistická Ročenka Slovenskej Republiky 2018 VEDA; National Forestry Center: Zvolen, Slovakia, 2019; p. 246. (In Slovak) [Google Scholar]
  159. Jahresstrecke Dachse 2018/2019; Deutscher Jagdverband, Handbuch: Berlin, Germany. 2020. Available online: www.jagdverband.de (accessed on 30 June 2020). (In Germany).
  160. Jakttidsöversyn [Hunting Time Review] 2019/2020. Naturvårdsverkets Preliminära Förslag, Paket 1 Remissversion. Naturvårdsverket [Swedish Environmental Protection Agency], Stockholm. Available online: https://www.naturvardsverket.se/contentassets/c517d15f74f94086b6981aa5f0f7f6c3/remissammanstallning-jakttidsoversyn-paket-1.pdf (accessed on 30 June 2020). (In Swedish).
  161. Kauhala, K. Changes in distribution of the European badger Meles meles in Finland during the rapid colonization of the raccoon dog. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 1995, 32, 183–191. [Google Scholar]
  162. Bauduin, B.; Pastoret, P.P.; Brochier, B. Note sur l’evolution de la population de blaireaux (Meles meles) en Ardenne belge. Anim. Hum. 1999, 19, 75–82. (In French) [Google Scholar]
  163. Aaris-Sørensen, J. Past and present distribution of badgers Meles meles in the Copenhagen area. Biol. Conserv. 1987, 41, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Wiertz, J. Fluctuations in the Dutch Badger Meles meles population between 1960 and 1990. Mamm. Rev. 1993, 23, 59–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Sobrino, R.; Acevedo, P.; Escudero, M.A.; Marco, J.; Gortázar, C. Carnivore population trends in Spanish agrosystems after the reduction in food availability due to rabbit decline by rabbit haemorrhagic disease and improved waste management. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 2009, 55, 161–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Van Langevelde, F.; van Dooremalen, C.; Jaarsma, C.F. Traffic mortality and the role of minor roads. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 90, 660–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Dekker, J.J.A.; Bekker, H.G.J. Badger (Meles meles) road mortality in the Netherlands: The characteristics of victims and the effects of mitigation measures. Lutra 2010, 53, 81–92. [Google Scholar]
  168. Geiger, M.; Taucher, A.L.; Gloor, S.; Hegglin, D.; Bantadina, F. In the footsteps of city foxes: Evidence for a rise of urban badger populations in Switzerland. Hystrix 2016, 29, 236–238. [Google Scholar]
  169. Nowakowski, K.; Ważna, A.; Kurek, P.; Cichocki, J.; Bojarski, J.; Gabryś, G. Long arm of motorway–the impact of fenced road on the mortality of European badgers. Environ. Manag. 2022, 69, 429–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Myers, N. An expanded approach to the problem of disappearing species. Science 1976, 193, 198–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Animals 12 00898 g001 550
Figure 1. General hunting seasons of the European badger Meles meles in European countries. Green area–species protected or hunting suspended; red area–species hunted; *—countries where hunting period differs between regions (for more details, see Table 1); for these states, minimum (red area) and maximum (pink area) hunting seasons are presented.
Figure 1. General hunting seasons of the European badger Meles meles in European countries. Green area–species protected or hunting suspended; red area–species hunted; *—countries where hunting period differs between regions (for more details, see Table 1); for these states, minimum (red area) and maximum (pink area) hunting seasons are presented.
Animals 12 00898 g001
Animals 12 00898 g002 550
Figure 2. General hunting seasons of European badger Meles meles in Europe. The percentages in the pie chart indicate the range share of a given legal status of the badger. Countries where hunting season differs between regions (Austria, France, Germany, and Switzerland) classified as explained in Methods, more detailed data presented in Table 1. Updated to 30 June 2020.
Figure 2. General hunting seasons of European badger Meles meles in Europe. The percentages in the pie chart indicate the range share of a given legal status of the badger. Countries where hunting season differs between regions (Austria, France, Germany, and Switzerland) classified as explained in Methods, more detailed data presented in Table 1. Updated to 30 June 2020.
Animals 12 00898 g002
Table
Table 1. Status of European badger Meles meles in Europe. Status: P = protected all year round; H = hunted; U = unclear: game species not hunted but also not protected. The date when the species was mentioned as fully protected is given in brackets. Updated in June 2020.
Table 1. Status of European badger Meles meles in Europe. Status: P = protected all year round; H = hunted; U = unclear: game species not hunted but also not protected. The date when the species was mentioned as fully protected is given in brackets. Updated in June 2020.
CountryStatus P/H/URed List/Data BookGeneral Hunting SeasonSupplementary Hunting Season and RemarksSource
AlbaniaP [2008]EN–Due to poor law enforcement and poaching, Albanian Government established in 2014 a hunting ban for two years in whole country. In 2016, that ban was extended till 2021.[45,46]
AndorraP [2013]–––[47]
AustriaHLCHunting season regulated only regionally.01.04–31.03 Steiermark–all year; 01.06–01.01 Wien–in practice not hunted because of public security; 01.06–31.01 Burgenland, Kärnten; 16.06–31.01 Niederösterreich, 01.07–15.01 Oberösterreich; 01.07–28.02 Vorarlberg; 15.07–15.02 Tirol; 16.08–30.11 Salzburg.[48,49,50]
BelarusP [1981]VU––[51]
BelgiumP [1992]DD; VU–Hunting limited since 1973. VU status in Flanders and DD in Wallonia. In Brussels region very rare.[52,53,54,55]
Bosnia and
Herzegovina		H–All yearIn Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Republic of Srpska, and Brčko District, badger is not mentioned as protected species and hunting period is not defined thus in practice it can be hunted all year round.[56,57]
BulgariaH–01.08–end of Feb–[58]
CroatiaH–01.08–31.12–[59]
CzechiaHLC01.09–30.11Hunting permitted all year round where capercaillie, black grouse, hazel grouse and partridge occur.[60,61]
DenmarkP [1994]LC––[62,63]
EstoniaH–01.09–end of FebSetts with > 10 entrances protected by law.[64,65]
FinlandH–01.08–31.03Before 2014, an additional summer hunting season 01.05–31.07 was allowed (except females with cubs). Now not allowed.[66]
FranceHLC23.08/29.09–12.01/end of FebDepartments: Bas-Rhin, Paris–hunting suspended. 15.05–…–supplementary period on may be announced and differed each year. Exact data of beginning and finishing of general hunting season published by prefects each year and depending on region vary between 23.08/29.09 to 12.01/end of Feb. Hunting with dogs, also burrow digging, is allowed.[67,68,69]
GermanyH–01.08–31.10All species occurring In Germanyy are mentioned in red list with proper category different from IUCN standards. In Germany red list, badger is considered as “ungefährdet” (not threatened). Berlin, Bremen–hunting suspended; 01.01–31.12 Mecklenburg–Vorpommern, Sachsen–all year;
01.01–31.12 Rheinland–Pfalz all year for juv., 01.08–31.12 for adults; 01.06–31.12 Baden–Württemberg for juv., 01.08–31.12 for adults; 01.08–31.10 Hessen, Saarland, Bayern; 01.08–15.01 Thüringen; 01.08–31.01 Brandenburg; Sachsen–Anhalt; Schleswig–Holstein, 01.09–30.11 Nordrhein–Westfalen; 01.09–31.01 Niedersachsen;
16.09–31.10 Hamburg.		[70,71,72,73]
GreeceUNE–Populations from Crete and Rhodes are distinguished as subspecies of M. canescens (M. c. arcalus and M. c. rhodius).[74]
HungaryH–01.07–end of Feb–[75]
IrelandP [1976]LC–Licenses for badger cull have been granted in isolated areas to try to eradicate bovine tuberculosis.[76,77,78]
ItalyULC–Italian Legge 157/92 (so-called game-law) lists all native species that can be hunted in Italy during hunting season. Badger is not listed, so it cannot be hunted.[79,80]
KosovoHLC01.08–30.11–[81,82]
LatviaH–01.08–31.03–[83]
LiechtensteinH–01.09–31.12–[84]
LithuaniaH–01.10–01.12–[85]
LuxembourgP [1986]––Hunting suspended since 1974. In 1986 badger became strictly protected by law.[86,87]
MoldovaU––Game species but hunting suspended since 1995.[88]
MontenegroH–All yearNot estimated hunting season, so badger can be hunted all year round.[89]
the
Netherlands		P [1942]––Since 1942 hunting suspended, but in some cases hunting license was granted. As a result, hunting was not stopped until 1967, when badger became strictly protected with no exceptions.[90,91]
North
Macedonia		U––Mentioned as a game species but hunting suspended.[92]
NorwayHLC21.08–31.01–[93,94]
PolandH–01.09–30.11Hunting permitted all year where capercaillie and black grouse occur.[95]
PortugalP [1986]LC––[96,97]
RomaniaH–01.08–31.03–[98]
San MarinoP [2007]LC––[99,100]
SerbiaH–01.07–28.02–[101]
SlovakiaHVU01.09–30.11–[102,103]
SloveniaH–01.08–31.12–[104]
SpainP [1989]LC–Categories of conservation status differ between autonomous regions, i.e., VU in Murcia. Real problems: predator control and hunting for foxes in burrows that may be inhabited by badgers.[105,106,107]
SwedenH–01.08–15.02Hunting allowed all year round near human settlements, in gardens or when they pose a threat, on islands and near hen farms. 01.06–31.07–only for juveniles. Hunting with dogs, also in burrows, is allowed.[108]
SwitzerlandHLC16.06–15.01Genève/Genf–hunting suspended; 16.06–15.01 Aargau, Basel–Stadt, Basel–Landschaft, Jura, Luzern, Nidwalden, St. Gallen, Schaffhausen, Solothurn, Thurgau, Ticino/Tessin, Zurich; 03.07–14.01 Appenzell, Ausserrhoden; 13.08–12.12 Neuchâtel/Neuenburg; 01.09-31.12 Bern; 01.09–15.01 Fribourg/Freiburg, Uri, Graubünden; 01.09–22.09 + 01.10–28(29).02 Schwyz; 01.09–24.09 + 07.10–15.01 Obwalden; 04.09–15.01 Appenzell, Innerrhoden; 17.09–15.01 Zug, Valais/Wallis; 01.10–15.01 Glarus; 01.01–15.01 + 01.10–31.10 Vaud/Waadt.[109,110,111]
TurkeyP–––[112]
UkraineH–01.10–30.11–[113]
United
Kingdom		PLC–Protected since 1985 in Northern Ireland, 1992 in England and Wales, 2011 in Scotland. Badgers are not hunted, with exceptions where it may be necessary to kill/harm/disturb them (a special license is needed). Each year, since 2013, UK government extends the number of areas with badger culling in order to eradicate bovine tuberculosis.[114,115,116,117,118]
Table
Table 2. Spatial characteristics of European badger Meles meles population in various parts of Europe. Status: P = protected all year round; H = hunted; U = unclear: game species not hunted but also not protected. The length of general hunting season given in brackets. For more detailed data see Table 1.
Table 2. Spatial characteristics of European badger Meles meles population in various parts of Europe. Status: P = protected all year round; H = hunted; U = unclear: game species not hunted but also not protected. The length of general hunting season given in brackets. For more detailed data see Table 1.
RegionStatus/General Hunting SeasonPopulation DensitySett DensityStudy AreaSource
N/10 km2Setts/10 km2km2
ScotlandP22.0–1.21[140]
British IslesP11.0–253.0––[141]
Wytham Woods, EnglandP443.0––[142]
NE PolandH (3)5.91.0–[143]
C PolandH (3)3.10.3–1.1–[144]
CzechiaH (3)0.6–7.1––[145]
N Moravia, CzechiaH (3)1.24.51–[7]
NE BelarusP0.90.1216–34[123]
Białowieża Forest, PolandH (3)1.5–2.10.4–0.58–25[39]
W Carpathians, PolandH (3)2.20.954.4–11.2[125]
the
Netherlands		P4.0–22.0–0.8–1.1[139]
SwitzerlandH (7)4.0–15.06.02.1–4.8[146]
N ItalyU9.3–14.03.4–5.10.9–3.2[147]
S SpainP3.6––[148]
PortugalP3.6–4.8––[149]
Table
Table 3. Trends in European badger Meles meles hunting bag (decrease in bold). Status: P = protected all year round; H = hunted; U = unclear: game species not hunted but also not protected. The length of general hunting season given in brackets. For more detailed data see Table 1.
Table 3. Trends in European badger Meles meles hunting bag (decrease in bold). Status: P = protected all year round; H = hunted; U = unclear: game species not hunted but also not protected. The length of general hunting season given in brackets. For more detailed data see Table 1.
CountryStatus/General Hunting SeasonPeriodNumber of Hunted BadgersTrend of AcquisitionSource
StartEnd%↑↓
PolandH (3)1990–2018ca. 3406400+1782%↑[152]
CzechiaH (3)1990–2018ca. 4904000+720%↑[153,154]
HungaryH (8)2002–20181 64912,394+651%↑[155]
EstoniaH (6)1992–2015ca. 50165+230%↑[156]
SlovakiaH (3)1990–2018ca. 5401395+158%↑[157,158]
GermanyH (3)1999–201933 82479,900+136%↑[159]
SwitzerlandH (7)1990–20181 8123142+73%↑[111]
SwedenH (6.5)1998–201830 40823,593−22%↓[160]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kurek, P.; Piechnik, Ł.; Wiatrowska, B.; Ważna, A.; Nowakowski, K.; Pardavila, X.; Cichocki, J.; Seget, B. Badger Meles meles as Ecosystem Engineer and Its Legal Status in Europe. Animals 2022, 12, 898. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12070898

AMA Style

Kurek P, Piechnik Ł, Wiatrowska B, Ważna A, Nowakowski K, Pardavila X, Cichocki J, Seget B. Badger Meles meles as Ecosystem Engineer and Its Legal Status in Europe. Animals. 2022; 12(7):898. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12070898

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kurek, Przemysław, Łukasz Piechnik, Blanka Wiatrowska, Agnieszka Ważna, Krzysztof Nowakowski, Xosé Pardavila, Jan Cichocki, and Barbara Seget. 2022. "Badger Meles meles as Ecosystem Engineer and Its Legal Status in Europe" Animals 12, no. 7: 898. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12070898

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop