Next Article in Journal
Synthesis of Piperine-Based Ester Derivatives with Diverse Aromatic Rings and Their Agricultural Bioactivities against Tetranychus cinnabarinus Boisduval, Aphis citricola Van der Goot, and Eriosoma lanigerum Hausmann
Previous Article in Journal
The Genus Schizoprymnus Förster, 1863 (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Brachistinae) from China, with Descriptions of Seven New Species
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Pupal Warning Coloration of Three Species of Cystidia (Lepidoptera: Geometridae: Ennominae) in Relation to Their Pupation Sites

Department of Biology, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Minamiosawa 1-1, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0397, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2023, 14(1), 38; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14010038
Submission received: 5 December 2022 / Revised: 23 December 2022 / Accepted: 30 December 2022 / Published: 31 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Insect Ecology, Diversity and Conservation)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The evolution of warning (aposematic) colors in insects has been well studied for adult wings and larval bodies. However, there are few reports on the evolution of warning colors in pupae. We hypothesized that pupal coloration of the moth Cystidia (Geometridae: Ennominae) is aposematic, and examined the color pattern, pupation site, palatability, and predator’s learning for three species of Cystidia. Pupae of C. couaggaria and C. truncangulata have a yellow surface dotted with black spots, that seems conspicuous for the visually food-searching predators. These two species make the naked pupae on the surface of branches and leaves above the ground, where they are more conspicuous against the predators. Pupae of C. stratonice also have a yellow surface with black spots, but the head, thorax, wing pads, and abdominal end are uniformly blackish. This species also differs from the other two species in that it pupates in an above-ground pouch made of leaves by spinning with course silk. In the predation experiment using lizards as one of the potential predators, pupae of all three species were repelled, and repeated biting of pupae increased the lizard’s tendency to avoid them. These results suggest that the conspicuous coloration of unpalatable pupae of Cystidia may function as a warning color. However, C. stratonice pupating in the leaf pouch may halve the function of the warning color, and the concealing dark color in the pouch may be more developed in this species than in the other two species.

Abstract

Many insects display a cryptic color to avoid detection by predators that search for prey by sight. However, some species with chemicals that predators dislike may display a warning color (aposematism) to predators. The predators can learn easier that the species is unsuitable as prey if the color is more conspicuous. Therefore, it is assumed that the acquisition of the warning color requires not only unpalatability, but also exposure of the color to predators and the ability of predators to recognize and learn it unpalatable. In the moths of the subfamily Ennominae, almost all of genera produce uniformly brown or green pupae, but the pupae of the genus Cystidia have conspicuous coloration of yellow background and black spots. In this study, to clarify whether the color of these pupae is the warning color or not, we compared the coloration, pupation site, and palatability among the three species of this genus: C. couaggaria, C. truncangulata, and C. stratonice. Learning by the predators was also examined using lizards as a potential predator of the moths. The results showed that all three species were repelled (unpalatable) by the lizards, and that repeated providing of the pupae to the lizards decreased their willingness to prey on them (probably due to learning). Pupation sites of C. couaggaria and C. truncangulata were located on the surface of branches and leaves high above the ground, whereas C. stratonice pupated in the space of leaves spun with course silk at lower site above the ground. Thus, the conspicuous coloration of pupal Cystidia is considered to be a warning color, but the pupae of C. stratonice are more blackish than those of the most closely related C. truncangulata. The pupal color of C. stratonice is likely to have a dual meaning as cryptic and warning colors. The dark colored pupa may be inconspicuous when hidden within the leaf space, but once detected by the predators, the yellow color of the pupa may function as a warning color.

1. Introduction

Predation avoidance of the pupal stage in insects has received little attention in comparison to larval and adult stages [1]. In insect life cycles, the pupae are an immobile stage, and the pupation site selection is critical to survive this stage. Pupae of most insect species are cryptic in color and hide under the substrates or in inconspicuous cocoons [1,2,3,4]. However, if insects have toxins or bad odor, they can develop warning coloration (aposematism). Such a prominent color signals to visually hunting predators that the prey is unprofitable through the process of predator’s experience and learning [5]. The pupal color of some insect species is prominent and seems to be warning coloration, for example in Delias and Aporia of butterflies [6] and Abraxas grossulariata (Linnaeus, 1758) of moths [7,8]. However, prominent pupal colors are not always warning colors. Only a few insects have been proven to be warning colors. One is the toxic two-spotted ladybird beetle, Adalia bipunctata (Linnaeus, 1758), which has warning colors at all stages of its life cycle [9], and the other is the unpalatable moth, Ivela auripes (Butler, 1877), which pupates at the exposed sites such as tree trunk and rock surface above the ground and displays the conspicuous yellow pupal body with seven longitudinal stripes of blackish dots [10].
The moths of Cystidia (Lepidoptera: Geometridae: Ennominae) produce colorful pupae exceptionally patterned among Ennominae [11]. We noticed that the colorful pupae of Cystidia are exposed on the surface of leaves and twigs above the ground and are likely to be warning coloration. If so, they should be unpalatable for the predators, such as birds, mammals and lizards, that use their vision to search for food. In Japan, three species of Cystidia are distributed widely [11]: C. couaggaria (Guenée, 1858), C. truncangulata Wehrli, 1934, and C. stratonice (Stoll, 1782). This genus belongs to the tribe Cystidiini in Ennominae [12,13]. These species are distributed from Far East Russia to Japan [12] and adults appear in early summer [14]. The external morphology of larvae and pupae of these species are described in detail and each species can be identified based on their morphology and color patterns [11,14,15]. Adults fly and mate in the daytime using female sex pheromone (hydrocarbons) [16,17]. Six species of hymenopteran parasitoids are recorded from the pupae of C. couggaria [18]. These are the information on Cystidia known so far.
In this study, to examine the possibility of warning coloration of these Cystidia pupae, first, the pupal size, color, and marking pattern are compared on their phylogenetic tree based on the barcoding COI sequences. Second, pupation sites in the field are compared among the three species. Third, palatability of these pupae is assessed using the lizard as a potential predator. Finally, the observed trend of variation in pupal coloration is discussed in relation to phylogenetic relationships, pupation site selection, and palatability.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Insects

Larvae, pupae and adults of C. couaggaria were collected from a forest at Hino, western Tokyo, in May and June 2020. They were placed individually in a plastic cup (130 mm in diameter, 55 mm in depth) and kept at natural temperatures and daylength. Leaves of the tree Armeniaca mume (Rosaceae) were given to the larvae. Larvae of C. truncangulata were collected from a forest at Moriya, Ibaraki Prefecture, on 24 April 2021, and reared at natural temperatures and daylength, giving leaves of the tree Celastrus orbiculatus (Celastraceae). Field-caught pupae from the same locality on 24 May 2020 and adults from Ueda, Nagano Prefecture, on 24 June 2020, were also used for experiments. Larvae, pupae and adults of C. stratonice were collected from a forest at Ueda, Nagano Prefecture, in June 2020. The larvae were reared at natural temperatures and daylength, giving leaves of C. orbiculatus.

2.2. Morphological Measurements

Body size were measured using the free software, ImageJ (version 1.53e; National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA), based on the photographs of randomly chosen 6 final-instar larvae, 11 pupae, 5 male adults, and 5 female adults of C. couaggaria; 6 final-instar larvae, 25 pupae, 8 male adults, and 10 female adults of C. truncangulata; 8 final-instar larvae, 10 pupae, 6 male adults, and 4 female adults of C. stratonice. We measured the body length (from the front of head to the body end) and width (at the widest part of body) of larvae and pupae from the dorsal side, and the forewing length (from base to the tip) of adults (Figure 1).
Visual pigments of the potential predators such as birds and lizards can absorb ultraviolet light [19,20]. Therefore, to know the pupal color patterns under ultraviolet light, the pupal photographs of the three species of Cystidia were taken using an ultraviolet filter (U330; HOYA Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).

2.3. DNA Barcoding

Legs of the dried adult specimens of C. couaggaria collected at Hino, western Tokyo, and C. truncangulata and C. stratonice both collected at Ueda, Nagano Prefecture, were used for DNA barcoding and molecular phylogenetic analysis. Total genomic DNA was extracted from these 3 individuals, using a DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene fragment was amplified using Ex Taq® (TaKaRa, Tokyo, Japan) by the primer set forward 5′-TTATTTTTGGAATTTGAGC-3′ and reverse 5′-CCTGTTAATCCTCCTACTGT-3′ [21]. The PCR reaction mix (total volume 10 µL) contained 1.0 µL 10× Ex Taq Buffer, 0.8 µL 25 mM dNTP mix, 0.5 µL of each the forward and reverse primer (10 pM), 0.05 µL Taq polymerase, 6.15 µL distilled deionized water, and 1.0 µL template DNA. The PCR protocols implemented using a T100™ thermal cycler (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) were as follows: an initial 3 min denaturing step at 94 °C; 35 cycles of 20 sec at 94 °C, 20 sec at 50 °C, and 30 sec at 72 °C; with a final 5 min extension at 72 °C. The PCR products were purified with illustra™ ExoProStar™ 1-Step (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK) and sequenced using BigDye® Terminator ver. 3.1 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) on an ABI 3130xl Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems).
Direct sequencing data were aligned with the outgroup data using MEGA X [22]. The sequences were aligned to 585 bp without gaps (GenBank accession numbers LC742382 in C. couaggaria, LC742380 in C. truncangulata, and LC742381 in C. stratonice) and the outgroup Abraxas miranda Butler, 1878 (JN087399) [23] belonging to the tribe Abraxini of the subfamily Ennominae and Geometra papilionaria (Linnaeus, 1758) (GU655815) [24] belonging to the subfamily Geometrinae. Phylogenetic trees were constructed by the neighbor-joining (NJ) method based on p-distance (bootstrap replication = 1000) and maximum likelihood (ML) estimation (bootstrap replication = 1000) based on the General Time Reversible model following the gamma distribution with invariant sites using MEGA X [22]. The best-fit nucleotide substitution models were estimated based on the corrected Akaike’s information criterion (AICc) [25] using MEGA X [22].

2.4. Pupation Site Selection

We searched for prepupae, pupae and pupal exuviae of C. truncangulata and C. stratonice in a forest at Ueda, Nagano Prefecture, on 31 May and 2 June 2020 and 13 June 2021. Those of C. couaggaria were collected from a forest at Ichikawa, Chiba Prefecture, on 13 May 2021. We recorded the location by height from the ground beginning at 0 m if located on the soil surface. Each pupation site was recorded by distinguishing the situation into five categories; on twig surface, on artificial substrate surface (wire net and concrete pillar), upper surface of a leaf, underside of a leaf, and within leaves stitched together with silk (Figure 2).

2.5. Assessment of Palatability

A total of 36 (#1–36) lizards, Plestiodon finitimus Okamoto et Hikida, 2012, were used as a potential predator. These lizards were caught at Inagi, Tama, Hino, and Hachioji Cities, western Tokyo, in May 3, 7, 13, 27, 29, and June 15, 24, 26, 2020 and April 12, 16, 18, 2021. The mean snout to vent length (SVL) of them was 60.4 mm (SD = 4.1, N = 36) and total tail length was 76.3 mm (SD = 22.0, N = 36). They were kept individually in plastic cages (200 mm × 350 mm, 200 mm in depth) at 17–33 °C with natural daylength. Each cage was filled up to 10 mm with a mixture of peat moss and red ball soil in a 1:1 ratio and an unglazed shelter. Water was supplied constantly in a cup (90 mm in diameter, 50 mm in depth). Two mealworms (larvae of Tenebrio molitor Linnaeus, 1758) were fed during the 3-h basking period with artificial light every other day.
Feeding experiments were conducted for lizards maintained in the cage for at least one week. To test palatability of larval, pupal, and adult C. couaggaria, after 30-min basking, one larva was given to #1–3 lizards daily for five consecutive days (1st- to 5th-day trials). Similarly, one pupa was given to #4–6 lizards, one male adult to #7–9 lizards, and one female adult to #10–12 lizards daily for five days. This 5-day feeding experiment was conducted also in C. truncangulata using #13–24 lizards and in C. stratonice using #25–36 lizards. The feeding willingness of each lizard was checked by giving one mealworm just before the 1st-day trial and by giving three mealworms just after the 5th-day trial. To prevent the adult moth from flying out of the cage bottom, adults were given after cutting the forewings partly at their edges. Pupae were suspended by a thin black polyester thread (0.15 mm in diameter) and presented to the lizards. All tests were terminated if there was no approach to the prey for 20 s. Lizard behavior was recorded with a video camera (12 MPx Camera, Apple Inc., Cupertino, CA, USA) of the Apple iPhone 8. The lizard’s behavior was discriminated into seven categorized sequences: no response (0), heading toward prey (1), licking prey (2), pecking prey with their mouthparts (3), biting prey but immediately releasing it (4), swallowing prey but regurgitating it (5), and complete feeding (6). Once the lizards were used for the 5-day feeding experiment, they were released to the capture sites in the field.

2.6. Statistics

Values are shown as mean ± standard deviation (SD) with sample size (N). To compare the height of pupation sites from the ground surface among the three species, the Kruskal–Wallis test and the following Steel-Dwass multiple comparison test were used. Two-way analysis of variance (two-way ANOVA) was used to test differences in the lizard body size (SVL) among the feeding experiment groups which differ in the developmental stages and species of Cystidia.

3. Results

3.1. Morphological Comparison

Larvae are elongated in the three species, but the color patterns differed among the species (L in Figure 1). Body length of the last-instar larvae is 32.1 ± 4.5 mm (N = 6) in C. couaggaria, 30.6 ± 5.7 mm (N = 6) in C. truncangulata, and 31.8 ± 3.3 mm (N = 8) in C. stratonice. Their body width is 3.3 ± 0.7 mm (N = 6), 3.2 ± 0.4 mm (N = 6), and 3.5 ± 0.4 mm (N = 8), respectively.
Pupae of the three species similarly have blackish dotted lines longitudinally on the yellow body (P in Figure 1). However, the blackish markings differ among the species; larger marking in C. couaggaria, smaller dotted marking in C. truncangulata, and totally blackish in the head, thorax including wing pads, and caudal segments of the abdomen in C. stratonice. Such blackish markings are kept during the pupal stage, except for the stage near adult emergence at which the adult wing marking is formed in wing pads (P1–P3 in Figure 1). The blackish marking patterns do not differ between the photographs taken under visible and ultraviolet light conditions (PUV in Figure 1). The pupal length is 21.0 ± 1.3 mm (N = 11) in C. couaggaria, 17.7 ± 3.0 mm (N = 25) in C. truncangulata, and 18.2 ± 1.8 mm (N = 10) in C. stratonice. Their width is 5.3 ± 0.4 mm (N = 11), 4.8 ± 1.1 mm (N = 25), and 4.6 ± 0.4 mm (N = 10), respectively.
The adult commonly has white and black stripes on the wings and yellow and black bands on the abdomen. Male forewing length is 24.0 ± 1.0 mm (N = 5) in C. couaggaria, 25.4 ± 0.9 mm (N = 8) in C. truncangulata, and 26.7 ± 0.8 mm (N = 6) in C. stratonice. Female forewing length is 22.2 ± 1.5 mm (N = 5), 26.8 ± 1.8 mm (N = 10), and 25.9 ± 0.7 mm (N = 4), respectively.
Phylogenetic relationships of DNA barcoding results suggest that C. truncangulata and C. stratonice are more closely related among the three species of Cystidia (the tribe Cystidiini), although not supported strongly (Figure 1). These relationships are also reflected in morphological differences. The dotted black marking pattern on the yellow pupa and the blackish striped pattern on wings are closely similar between C. truncangulata and C. stratonice, but such patterns differ in C. couaggaria. In the former two species, however, the areas of pupal blackish marking are much wider in C. stratonice. The pupae of Abraxas miranda belonging to the different tribe Abraxini is entirely brown (Figure 1). This pupa was obtained by rearing a field-caught last-instar larva in Hachioji, western Tokyo, on 9 October 2021, and pupated on the bottom of the rearing cage.

3.2. Pupation Site

All pupae were found above the ground in the field (Figure 2). The median of pupation height was 1.4 m in C. couaggaria, 1.7 m in C. truncangulata, and 0.5 m in C. stratonice (Figure 3). The former two species pupated higher sites than the latter species (Kruskal–Wallis test, χ2 = 14.7, df = 2, p < 0.001). Pupae of C. couaggaria and C. truncangulata were exposed on the surface of twigs, leaves, and artificial wire mesh fences and stone blocks, whereas those of C. stratonice were hidden within the leaves roughly stitched together with silk (Table 1, Figure 2).

3.3. Palatability

The lizard body size in SVL did not differ among the feeding experiment groups (Table 2: two-way ANOVA; developmental stage, F3, 35 = 0.27, p = 0.85; species, F2, 35 = 1.65, p = 0.21; interaction, F6, 35 = 1.04, p = 0.43). All mealworms given at the 1st and 5th days were eaten by the lizards, whereas all stages of C. couaggaria, C. truncangulata, and C. stratonice were not eaten, suggesting that these moths are unpalatable for the lizards during their development (Table 2). In the 1st- to 3rd-day of feeding trials, most lizards showed the feeding sequences of pecking with their mouthparts (3) and biting (4), but after that such positive responses to the prey did little occur (Table 2). Thus, it is likely that lizards learn prey unpalatability if the moth of the same developmental stage were repeatedly given.

4. Discussion

Bodies and wings of most insect species resemble fresh or dead leaves and tree trunks and branches, which is a phenomenon known as cryptic coloration to avoid detection by the predators that use their vision to search for food [5]. Almost all pupae of 119 genera of Japanese Ennominae are known to be uniformly brown (pale, reddish, or dark brown) or green in Auaxa sulphurea [11]. The brown and green pupae may be cryptic to the background color. Among these 119 ennomine genera, pupae of the three species of Cystidia are reported to be exceptionally yellow with some black spots [11]. We confirmed this fact that pupae of C. couaggaria, C. truncangulata, and C. stratonice, are similar to each other in shape, size, color, and marking pattern (Figure 1). The marking pattern did not differ between visible and ultraviolet lights (Figure 1), suggesting that there was a similar image for birds and lizards that can use ultraviolet vision. The phylogenetic analysis suggests that Cystidia is monophyletic and C. truncangulata and C. stratonice are more closely related than C. couaggaria (Figure 1). However, there are some species-specific differences in pupal marking patterns (Figure 1). The black markings of C. couaggaria are usually larger and form at least three bands in the abdomen. The pupae of C. truncangulata have a smaller black spot and are widely yellowish, whereas the pupae of C. stratonice are more blackish throughout the pupal stage.
The conspicuous color common to Cystidia species is likely to be warning coloration. If the insect is equipped with defenses against predators such as toxins or inappetence, selection may favor warning colorations [5]. Warning coloration is a widespread strategy to alert predators about such prey unprofitability. The success of this strategy partly depends on predators being able to learn and recognize certain signals as indicators of toxicity by encountering frequently [26]. Thus, to discuss the possibility of pupal warning coloration, we need information of encountering rates to the predators, unpalatability of the pupae, and the ability of learning by the predators.
All three species of Cystidia pupate above the ground (Figure 2). Pupae of C. couaggaria and C. truncangulata are exposed on the surface of twigs, leaves, and artificial materials such as wire mesh fences and stone blocks, but those of C. stratonice are all hidden inside the leaves roughly spun with silk (Table 1). The height of pupation sites from the ground surface is greater in the former two species than the latter (Figure 3). Thus, the pupae of C. couaggaria and C. truncangulata seem to be more exposed to the predators and detected by the predators more frequently than those of C. stratonice. Most insects that pupate above the ground are cryptic in color that serve as camouflage to deceive the eyes of predators [2,27,28]. The exceptional examples are the toxic two-spotted ladybird beetle Adalia bipunctata, which has warning colors at all developmental stages [9], and the unpalatable moth Ivela auripes [10]. Warning colors evolved to warn predators that the prey is not profitable [29,30]. The benefit of conspicuous coloration strongly promotes predator learning in association with repellency [29,30]. The pupae of C. couaggaria and C. truncangulata are exposed to predators above the ground and their color is conspicuous just as the pupae of the ladybird beetle A. bipunctata and the moth I. auripes. In contrast, the pupae of C. stratonice are inside of the roughly spun leaves at the lower site above the ground. The pupal color of C. stratonice is likely to have a dual meaning as cryptic and warning colors. The more blackish pupa may be inconspicuous when hidden within the leaf space, but once detected by the predators, the yellow and black color pattern of the pupa may function as a warning color. To understand such interspecific differences in pupal colors, further attention should be paid to the effects of the pupation site environment on the predation intensity.
All developmental stages of larvae, pupae and adults of the three species of Cystidia are unpalatable for the lizards (Table 2). Under the experimental conditions, the lizards became to ignore the pupae with their feeding experience. Such a tendency suggests that they learn unpalatability of the pupae by their conspicuous coloration. Thus, the unpalatable pupae potentially show warning colors. The chemical analysis has never been conducted for Cystidia, but other ennomine moths, such as Arichanna gaschkevitchii (=A. jaguararia) and Abraxas grossulariata, are reported strongly toxic [7,31,32]. Adult A. gaschkevitchii includes grayanoid diterpenes that are acquired by larval host plant Pieris japonica (Ericaceae) and are effective in escaping from predation by birds and geckos. The adult of this moth exhibits an aposematic color pattern, suggesting the function of a warning color [32]. However, this moth pupates in the soil on the ground surface [15] and the pupae are uniformly brown [11]. Conspicuously colored adults and larvae of A. grossulariata include a bitter tasting cyanoglucoside, sarmentosin, that is effective in escaping from the predators such as birds, lizards, and frogs [7]. The pupae of this moth also exhibit an aposematic color pattern of a wasp-like yellow and black stripes and are visible from the loose cocoon above the ground, suggesting the function of a warning color [7,8]. The adults of Cystidia of the present study fly in the daytime, and the pupae are also exposed to the predators on the branches and leaves above the ground, excluding C. stratonice with a partially conspicuous color. Thus, the development of warning coloration of lepidopteran pupae seems to be affected by pupation site selection, which is exposed to the predators or not, after acquisition of unpalatability. This is a testable hypothesis of the warning color evolution of the pupal stage in insects.

5. Conclusions

Pupae of the geometrid moth Cystidia were unpalatable to lizards, one of the potential predators. When the pupae were repeatedly given to the lizards, they gradually ignore the pupae as prey. This suggests that the lizards learn unpalatability of the pupae through experience. Pupae were yellow with black spots, making them conspicuous. Furthermore, pupae are located on the surface of tree branches and leaves above the ground, where they are exposed to predators that search for prey with their eyes. These results indicate that the conspicuous color of Cystidia pupae functions as a warning color. However, the pupae inside the leaves spun with silk show more blackish marking pattern on the yellow body than the exposed pupae. This tendency to darken is thought to have two effects: one was to conceal the pupae to make it inconspicuous within the leaves, and the other was to serve as a warning color once predators detect them. To understand the interspecific differences in pupal colors, further attention should be paid to the relationship between the environment of the pupation site and pupal coloration.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.T. and F.H.; methodology, M.T.; validation, F.H.; formal analysis, M.T. and F.H.; investigation, M.T.; resources, M.T.; data curation, M.T. and F.H.; writing—original draft preparation, M.T.; writing—review and editing, F.H.; visualization, M.T. and F.H.; supervision, F.H.; funding acquisition, M.T.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was partly funded by JST SPRING grant number JPMJSP2156 to M.T.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Feeding experiments using the field-captured lizards were conducted under the permission by the Tokyo Metropolitan University Animal Ethics Committee (A2-25 in 2020, A3-3 in 2021).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the authors.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Hirotaka Sugawara for help in DNA sequencing and phylogenetic analysis, Sakie Kodama for help in collecting C. truncangulata, Honami Kawaguchi and Rira Ozawa for help in collecting C. couaggaria, and Hidemori Yazaki for useful comments on the early version of this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lindstedt, C.; Murphy, L.; Mappes, J. Antipredator strategies of pupae: How to avoid predation in an immobile life stage? Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 2019, 374, 20190069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Wiklund, C.; Sillen-Tullberg, B. Why distasteful butterflies have aposematic larvae and adults, but cryptic pupae: Evidence from predation experiments on the monarch and the European swallowtail. Evolution 1985, 39, 1155–1158. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Edmunds, M. The evolution of cryptic coloration. In Insect Defenses: Adaptive Mechanisms and Strategies of Prey and Predators; Evans, D.L., Schmidt, J.O., Eds.; State University of New York Press: Albany, NY, USA, 1990; pp. 3–21. [Google Scholar]
  4. Janzen, D.H.; Hallwachs, W.; Burns, J.M. A tropical horde of counterfeit predator eyes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 11659–11665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Caro, T.; Koneru, M. Towards an ecology of protective coloration. Biol. Rev. 2021, 96, 611–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Braby, M.F.; Nishida, K. The immature stages, larval food plants and biology of Neotropical mistletoe butterflies (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). II. The Catasticta group (Pierini: Aporiina). J. Nat. Hist. 2010, 44, 1831–1928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nishida, R.; Rothschild, M.; Mummery, R. Acyanoglucoside, sarmentosin, from the magpie moth, Abraxas grossulariata, Geometridae: Lepidoptera. Phytochemistry 1994, 36, 37–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sourakov, A. On adult-caterpillar mimicry: Cases from the moth world. News Lepid. Soc. 2016, 58, 97–99. [Google Scholar]
  9. Aslam, M.; Veselý, P.; Nedvěd, O. Response of passerine birds and chicks to larvae and pupae of ladybirds. Ecol. Entomol. 2019, 44, 792–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yazaki, H.; Kishimura, M.; Tsubuki, M.; Hayashi, F. Müllerian mimicry between cohabiting final-instar larval Pryeria sinica Moore, 1877 (Lepidoptera: Zygaenidae) and pupal Ivela auripes (Butler, 1877) (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). Pan-Pac. Entomol. 2019, 95, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nakamura, M. A morphological and phylogenetic study on the pupae of Geometridae (Insecta: Lepidoptera) from Japan. Tinea 2004, 18, 1–227. [Google Scholar]
  12. Anikin, V.V.; Baryshnikova, S.V.; Beljaev, E.A.; Dubatolov, V.V.; Efetov, K.A.; Zolotuhin, V.V.; Kovtunovich, V.N.; Kozlov, M.V.; Kononenko, V.S.; Lvovsky, A.L.; et al. Annotated Catalogue of the Insects of Russian Far East. Volume II. Lepidoptera; Dalnauka: Vladivostok, Russia, 2016; pp. 1–812. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  13. Zheng, X.; Zhang, R.; Yue, B.; Wu, Y.; Yang, N.; Zhou, C. Enhanced resolution of evolution and phylogeny of the moths inferred from nineteen mitochondrial genomes. Genes 2022, 13, 1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Sato, R.; Nakajima, H. Larvae of Japanese Cystidia and Planociampa (Lepidoptera: Geometriidae; Ennominae). Tyô Ga 1975, 26, 14–28. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar]
  15. Issiki, S. Early Stages of Japanese Moths in Colour; Hoikusha Publishing Co. Ltd.: Osaka, Japan, 1969; Volume 2, pp. 1–237. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar]
  16. Yamakawa, R.; Takubo, Y.; Ohbayashi, K.; Naka, H.; Ando, T. Female sex pheromone of Cystidia couaggaria couaggaria (Lepidoptera: Geometridae): Identification and field attraction. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2012, 76, 1303–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Naka, H. Female sex pheromones and mating behavior in diurnal moths: Implications for conservation biology. In Chemical Ecology of Insects: Applications and Associations with Plants and Microbes; Tabata, J., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2018; pp. 170–196. [Google Scholar]
  18. Konno, Y.; Matsuda, K.; Konishi, K. Hymenopterous parasitoids of Cystidia couggaria (Guenee) (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). Jpn. J. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 2002, 46, 182–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Chen, D.M.; Collins, J.S.; Goldsmith, T.H. The ultraviolet receptor of bird retinas. Science 1984, 225, 337–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Fleishman, L.J.; Loew, E.R.; Leal, M. Ultraviolet vision in lizards. Nature 1993, 365, 397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yamamoto, S.; Sota, T. Incipient allochronic speciation by climatic disruption of the reproductive period. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2009, 276, 2711–2719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Li, M.; Knyaz, C.; Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 1547–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lee, W.; Koh, S.H.; Choi, W.I.; Jung, C.S.; Kim, I.K.; Byun, B.K.; Lee, B.W.; Kim, Y.S.; Lim, J.; Kim, S.; et al. Barcoding forest insect pests in South Korea: Constructing a basic endemic species dataset. J. Asia-Pac. Entomol. 2012, 15, 363–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hausmann, A.; Haszprunar, G.; Segerer, A.H.; Speidel, W.; Behounek, G.; Hebert, P.D. Now DNA-barcoded: The butterflies and larger moths of Germany. Spixiana 2011, 34, 47–58. [Google Scholar]
  25. Sugiura, N. Further analysts of the data by Akaike’ s information criterion and the finite corrections. Commun. Stat. Theory Methods 1978, 7, 13–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Arenas, L.M.; Stevens, M. Diversity in warning coloration is easily recognized by avian predators. J. Evol. Biol. 2017, 30, 1288–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Mayekar, H.V.; Kodandaramaiah, U. Pupal colour plasticity in a tropical butterfly, Mycalesis mineus (Nymphalidae: Satyrinae). PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0171482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Yumnam, T.; Banerjee, B.; Kodandaramaiah, U. Pupal colour plasticity in the butterfly Catopsilia pomona (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2021, 134, 331–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mappes, J.; Marples, N.; Endler, J.A. The complex business of survival by aposematism. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2005, 20, 598–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mappes, J.; Kokko, H.; Ojala, K.; Lindström, L. Seasonal changes in predator community switch the direction of selection for prey defences. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Nishida, R.; Fukami, H.; Iriye, R.; Kumazawa, Z. Accumulation of highly toxic ericaceous diterpenoids by the geometrid moth, Arichanna gaschkevitchii. Agric. Biol. Chem. 1990, 54, 2347–2352. [Google Scholar]
  32. Nishida, R. Sequestration of plant secondary compounds by butterflies and moths. Chemoecology 1994, 5, 127–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Larvae (L), pupae (P), and adults (A) of the three species of Cystidia moths; C. couaggaria, C. truncangulata, and C. stratonice. Each photograph shows the dorsal or lateral view under visible and ultraviolet (UV) light. In pupal stage, P1–P3 shows the pupal color patterns in the day of pupation, 6th or 7th day since pupation, and 1 day before adult emergence. The DNA barcoding result is drawn for three species of Cystidia and the outgroup Abraxas miranda (JN087399) belonging to the tribe Abraxini of the subfamily Ennominae and Geometra papilionaria (GU655815) belonging to the subfamily Geometrinae. The numerals near the branches present % probabilities in the neighbor-joining/maximum likelihood methods. Scale bars show 10 mm.
Figure 1. Larvae (L), pupae (P), and adults (A) of the three species of Cystidia moths; C. couaggaria, C. truncangulata, and C. stratonice. Each photograph shows the dorsal or lateral view under visible and ultraviolet (UV) light. In pupal stage, P1–P3 shows the pupal color patterns in the day of pupation, 6th or 7th day since pupation, and 1 day before adult emergence. The DNA barcoding result is drawn for three species of Cystidia and the outgroup Abraxas miranda (JN087399) belonging to the tribe Abraxini of the subfamily Ennominae and Geometra papilionaria (GU655815) belonging to the subfamily Geometrinae. The numerals near the branches present % probabilities in the neighbor-joining/maximum likelihood methods. Scale bars show 10 mm.
Insects 14 00038 g001
Figure 2. Pupation sites in the field of the three species of Cystidia moths; C. couaggaria (A,B), C. truncangulata (C,D), and C. stratonice (E,F). They pupate on the surface of twigs (A,C), upside a leaf (B), underside a leaf (C), and within the leaves stitched with silk, showing by white arrows (E,F).
Figure 2. Pupation sites in the field of the three species of Cystidia moths; C. couaggaria (A,B), C. truncangulata (C,D), and C. stratonice (E,F). They pupate on the surface of twigs (A,C), upside a leaf (B), underside a leaf (C), and within the leaves stitched with silk, showing by white arrows (E,F).
Insects 14 00038 g002
Figure 3. Height of the pupation sites from the ground surface of the three species of Cystidia moths; C. couaggaria (N = 56), C. truncangulata (N = 12), and C. stratonice (N = 17). Arrows indicate medians and the same alphabet denotes insignificant difference (p > 0.05) in the Steel-Dwass multiple comparison test after the Kruskal–Wallis test (p < 0.001).
Figure 3. Height of the pupation sites from the ground surface of the three species of Cystidia moths; C. couaggaria (N = 56), C. truncangulata (N = 12), and C. stratonice (N = 17). Arrows indicate medians and the same alphabet denotes insignificant difference (p > 0.05) in the Steel-Dwass multiple comparison test after the Kruskal–Wallis test (p < 0.001).
Insects 14 00038 g003
Table 1. Pupation sites of the three species of Cystidia moths; C. couaggaria, C. truncangulata, and C. stratonice in the field. The number of pupae found at five categories of pupation sites is shown (see Figure 2).
Table 1. Pupation sites of the three species of Cystidia moths; C. couaggaria, C. truncangulata, and C. stratonice in the field. The number of pupae found at five categories of pupation sites is shown (see Figure 2).
Pupation SiteOn Twig SurfaceOn Artificial Substrate SurfaceUpside a LeafUnderside a LeafIn Leaves Stitched Together with SilkTotal
C. couaggaria81470056
C. truncangulata4503012
C. stratonice00001717
Table 2. The lizard feeding behaviors in the five-day feeding trials of individual lizards (#1–36), when given larvae (L), pupae (P), adult males (Am), and adult females (Af) of the three species of Cystidia moths: C. couaggaria, C. truncangulata, and C. stratonice. Feeding behavior is shown by the six sequences to which lizards reach: no response (0), heading toward prey (1), licking prey (2), pecking prey with their mouthparts (3), biting prey but immediately releasing it (4), swallowing prey but regurgitating it (5), and complete feeding (6). Categories (5) and (6) are not observed, and more active responses (3) and (4) are shaded. SVL shows the lizard snout to vent length in mm.
Table 2. The lizard feeding behaviors in the five-day feeding trials of individual lizards (#1–36), when given larvae (L), pupae (P), adult males (Am), and adult females (Af) of the three species of Cystidia moths: C. couaggaria, C. truncangulata, and C. stratonice. Feeding behavior is shown by the six sequences to which lizards reach: no response (0), heading toward prey (1), licking prey (2), pecking prey with their mouthparts (3), biting prey but immediately releasing it (4), swallowing prey but regurgitating it (5), and complete feeding (6). Categories (5) and (6) are not observed, and more active responses (3) and (4) are shaded. SVL shows the lizard snout to vent length in mm.
Lizaed ID#1#2#3#4#5#6#7#8#9#10#11#12
Lizaed SVL (mm)595564556469606660556159
Stage of C. couaggariaLLLPPPAmAmAmAfAfAf
1st day442344444444
2nd day400442442322
3rd day411202444120
4th day321100000010
5th day220000001022
Lizaed ID#13#14#15#16#17#18#19#20#21#22#23#24
Lizaed SVL (mm)645957585854575558646160
Stage of C. truncangulataLLLPPPAmAmAmAfAfAf
1st day444444444444
2nd day222124444444
3rd day221001144043
4th day001101124000
5th day012202112000
Lizaed ID#25#26#27#28#29#30#31#32#33#34#35#36
Lizaed SVL (mm)666561615860705855646857
Stage of C. stratoniceLLLPPPAmAmAmAfAfAf
1st day444444432314
2nd day242222442114
3rd day242012420002
4th day210011221001
5th day241111130111
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tsubuki, M.; Hayashi, F. Pupal Warning Coloration of Three Species of Cystidia (Lepidoptera: Geometridae: Ennominae) in Relation to Their Pupation Sites. Insects 2023, 14, 38. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14010038

AMA Style

Tsubuki M, Hayashi F. Pupal Warning Coloration of Three Species of Cystidia (Lepidoptera: Geometridae: Ennominae) in Relation to Their Pupation Sites. Insects. 2023; 14(1):38. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14010038

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tsubuki, Makoto, and Fumio Hayashi. 2023. "Pupal Warning Coloration of Three Species of Cystidia (Lepidoptera: Geometridae: Ennominae) in Relation to Their Pupation Sites" Insects 14, no. 1: 38. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14010038

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop