Next Article in Journal
Mycorrhizal Benefits of Salt-Stressed Cinnamomum camphora (L.) Presl. May Be Related to P and Mn2+ Contents in Shoots, Biomass Allocation, and K+/Na+ in Roots and Shoots
Previous Article in Journal
Assessing Social Values for Ecosystem Services in Rural Areas Based on the SolVES Model: A Case Study from Nanjing, China
Previous Article in Special Issue
Pycnomerus italicus (Coleoptera: Zopheridae), an Endemic Endangered Species: A New Report on Its Presence in Southern Italy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Elucidation of the Taxonomy of Three Problematic East Asian Nola Leach, 1815, with Description of a New Species (Lepidoptera, Nolidae, Nolinae)

1
Division of Life Sciences, College of Life Sciences and Bioengineering, Incheon National University, Academi-ro, Incheon 22012, Korea
2
Bio-Resource and Environmental Center, Incheon National University, Academi-ro, Incheon 22012, Korea
3
Convergence Research Center for Insect Vectors, Division of Life Sciences, College of Life Sciences and Bioengineering, Incheon National University, Songdo˗dong, Incheon 22012, Korea
4
Natura Consulting Ltd., East Grinstead RH19 2EN, UK
5
Heterocera Press Ltd., Szt. István krt. 4, H-1137 Budapest, Hungary
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2022, 13(11), 1881; https://doi.org/10.3390/f13111881
Submission received: 2 October 2022 / Revised: 7 November 2022 / Accepted: 8 November 2022 / Published: 10 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Phylogenetic ​Classification and Distribution of Forest Insects)

Abstract

:
The paper discusses the taxonomy of three East Asian Nola Leach, 1815 taxa, N. costimacula Staudinger, 1887, N. japonibia (Strand, 1920) and N. innocua Butler, 1880. We describe a new species N. galliphaga sp. nov. from Japan and South Korea and synonymize N. japonibia syn. nov. with N. costimacula. Type specimens, additional adults, and their genitalia are illustrated.

1. Introduction

The genus Nola was established by Leach (1815), with the type species Phalaena cucullatella Linnaeus, 1758. The species of the genus are characterised by their small size, usually achromatic forewing, and trifine venation of the hindwing. The male genitalia of the Nola species are rather distinctive, and are characterised by the strongly reduced uncus, the bilobate valva, the usually simple harpe, the short, tubular aedeagus often bearing a large, curved cornutus. In the female genitalia, the ostium bursae is normally membranous, the ductus bursae is tubular, sometimes bulged, and the corpus bursae usually has an invaginated, somewhat thorn-shaped signum [1].
The genus is present in all continents (except for Antarctica) and especially highly diverse in the Indomalayan and Afrotropical biogeographic realms. Due to the vast number of taxar and the large proportion of cryptic species, the knowledge of the taxonomic content of the genus is far from complete and, based on our preliminary studies, a large number of taxa are undescribed, even in the most well-explored regions. In East Asia, 65 Nola species have been recorded to date, including the Russian Far East, Mongolia, China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Korea, and Japan [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. The most comprehensive overview of the genus was published by Inoue [2], whose work has long been used as a basis of further studies on the East Asian Nolidae [3,4,5,12,13,14]. However, this important monograph is not completely devoid of errors owing to some unexamined or overlooked historical primary type specimens deposited in European museums. The third and fourth authors of this paper had an opportunity to examine type specimens of East Asian Nola species housed in the NHMUK and MfN and this study allowed to recognise the misidentification of N. innocua by Inoue [2], whose erroneous concept was followed by Kononenko and Han [13] and Tshistjakov [4]. László et al. [14] published the genital morphology of true N. innocua Butler, 1880/ for the first time, based on the dissection of the female holotype housed in the NHMUK and further topotypical male and female specimens accessed in the NHMUK and MWM/ZSM. Consequently, the species which had earlier been erroneously identified as N. innocua by Inoue [2] is in fact a species new to science and it is described in this paper as N. galliphaga sp. nov.
The taxonomy of N. japonibia (Strand, 1920) has also been a subject to several misinterpretations. The taxon was originally described as a subspecies of N. innocua, and it has later been treated as valid species by Inoue [15]. The examinations of the female holotype of Celama innocua var. japonibia and female specimens of N. costimacula Staudinger, 1887 from various localities have confirmed the identity of the two taxa and thus here as a synonym of the latter: N. japonibia (Strand, 1920) is a junior synonym of N. costimacula Staudinger, 1887.
The taxonomy of N. japonibia (Strand, 1920) has also been a subject to several misinterpretations. The taxon was originally described as a subspecies of N. innocua, and it has later been treated as valid species by Inoue [15]. The examinations of the female holotype of Celama innocua var. japonibia and female specimens of N. costimacula Staudinger, 1887 from various localities have confirmed the identity of the two taxa and thus here as a synonym of the latter: N. japonibia (Strand, 1920) is a junior synonym of N. costimacula Staudinger, 1887.

2. Material and Methods

Specimens examined are preserved in the collections of the Hungarian Natural History Museum, Budapest, Hungary (HNHM), the Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals, Krakow, Poland (ISEZ), the Korean National Arboretum, Pocheon, Korea (KNAE), the Museum of Natural History, Berlin, Germany (MfN), the Museum Witt in the Bavarian State Collection of Zoology, Munich, Germany (MWM/ZSM), and the Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom (NHMUK). Genitalia were dissected and examined using either a Leica EZ4 or a Nikon SMZ 745T stereomicroscope. Images of INU adults were taken by a Tucsen Dhyana 400DC digital camera attached to a Leica S6D stereomicroscope or Canon EOS 6D Mark II camera equipped with a canon Macro 100mm lens, with dome illuminator Leica LED5000 HDI. Photos of MWM/ZSM and NHMUK adults were taken using a Nikon D90 DSLR camera equipped with a Nikkor AF Micro 60 mm lens. Genitalia photographs were taken using either a Tucsen Dhyana 400DC digital camera mounted on a Leica S8AP0 stereomicroscope or a Nikon Eclipse 80i compound microscope connected to a Nikon DS-Fi1 digital camera.
Further abbreviations:
INU: Incheon National University, South Korea;
LGN: Nolinae genitalia slide prepared by Gy. M. László;
NHMW: Natural History Museum, Vienna, Austria;
RL: genitalia slide prepared by L. Ronkay;
SH: genitalia slide prepared by Sung-Hwan, Oh.
The holotype label data have been transcribed verbatim in quotation marks and with “/” denoting a different label.

3. Results

Taxonomic account (Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6)
Superfamily Noctuoidea Latreille, 1809
Family Nolidae Bruand, 1846
Subfamily Nolinae Hampson, 1894
Genus Nola Leach, [1815]
  • Nola costimacula Staudinger, 1887
(Figure 1a–f, Figure 4a and Figure 5a,b)
Nola costimacula Staudinger [15]: 182. Type locality: Amur. Holotype: male, in coll. MfN.
Celama innocua Hampson [16]: 21.
Celama innocua var. japonibia: Strand [17]: 454. Type locality: Japan. Holotype: female, in coll. NHMUK. syn. nov.
Nola japonibia (Strand): Inoue [2] I: 661; Inoue [14]: 177; Oh [3]: 129; Kononenko and Han [13]: 67; Sasaki and Kishida [5]: 171; Beljaev et al. [6]: 403; Kim et al. [18]: 141.
Nola japoniba [sic, recte japonibia] (Strand): Poole [19]: 696.
Nola innocua costimacula Staudinger: Tshistjakov [4]: 7.
Nola costimacula Staudinger: Beljaev et al. [6]: 403; Kim et al. [18]: 141
Type material examined.
Holotype of Nola costimacula Staudinger, 1887: m#, pink label “Origin.”/with handwritten “13/6/77 Amur sup.”/“Amur sup. Hed.”/“Wileman Det”/“Celama innocua Butl Hps.” / with printed “374”/“ex coll. Staudinger” (MfN), gen. slide No. LGN 1226 (Figure 1a and Figure 4a).
Holotype of Celama innocua var. japonibia Strand: f#, red ring label “Type”/“H. Pryer Coll. Japan.”/with partly handwritten “Celama innocua var. japonibia Holotype. Strand Hampson Subsp.”/with handwritten “subsp.”/with printed “Leech Coll. 1900-64”/“Arctiidae genitalia slide No. 1775” (NHMUK) (Figure 1b and Figure 5a).
Additional materal examined.
Japan. 1 f#, Takao-san, Tokyo, 30.viii.1959, leg. H. Inoue, No. 322, Brit. Mus. 1972-325, gen. slide No. NHMUK Arctiidae 1818; 1 m#, same locality and collector, 14.v.1961, gen. slide No. Inoue 5295; 1 f#, Ueda, Morioka, Iivate Pref., 25.vii.1952, leg. M. Okano (NHMUK); 1m#, Takao-san, Tokyo, 14. V. 1961, leg. H. Inoue, gen. slide No. INU-12308 (INU).
North Korea. 1 m#, 1 f#, Pyongyang, City Pyongyang, 09.vii.1982, No. 761., leg. L. Forró and L. Ronkay, gen. slide Nos LGN 1865 (m#), LGN 1866 (f#) (MWM/ZSM).
South Korea. 1m#, Namsan-ri, Yangchon-myeon, Nonsan-si (N 36°09′21.52″, E 127°14′16.79″), 1. VIII. 2017 (S.M. Na, Y.B. Cha), genitalia slide No. INU-11603; 1f#, Seongdeok dam, Cheongsong-gun, 09. VIII. 2006 (Bae et al.); 2m#, Cha-ri, Mt. Goheonsan, Ulsan-si, 11. VI. 2012 (Ju, Park, Lee), genitalia slide No. INU-11956; 1m#, Suwon, 13. VII. 1975 (K.T. Park); 1m#, Gwangreung, 3. VI. 1988 (K.T. Park), genitalia slide No. SH-167; 2f#, Gwangreung, 4. VIII. 1988 (K.T. Park), genitalia slide Nos. SH-41, -151; 2m#, 7f#, Ipo-ri, [Yeoju-si] (N 37°23′, E 127°32″), 20. VIII. 1990 (S.W. Cho), genitalia slide No. INU-11565; 1m#, Mt. Yeogisan, [Suwon], 11. V. 1992 (K.T. Park), genitalia slide No. INU-11537; 1m#, Sanasa valley, Yangpyeong-gun, 22. VIII. 2013 (Ju, Kim, Park), genitalia slide No. INU-11597; 1f#, Chugok, Chuncheon-si, 30. VII. 1986 (K.T. Park), genitalia slide No. SH-40; 1f#, Chuncheon-si, 7. VI. 1990 (K.T. Park), genitalia slide No. SH-164; 1f#, Jeongseon-gun, 30. VII. 1991 (K.T. Park), genitalia slide No. SH-347; 1m#, Gangwon Natl. Univ., Chuncheon-si, 6. V. 1994 (K.T. Park), genitalia slide No. INU-11795; 1f#, Choji, Mt. Balkyosan, Hoengseong-gun, 29. VII. 2016 (Bae et al.), genitalia slide No. INU-11682; 1m#, Mt. Taegi-san, Hoengseong-gun (N 37°35′56.3″, E 128°14′53.0″), 10. VIII. 2018 (Y.S. Bae, D.J. Lee, T.G. Lee, Y.B. Cha, J.B. Heppner), genitalia slide No. INU-9199; 1m#, 1f#, Sangno-ri 863, Dongsong-eup, Cheolwon-gun (N 38°09′34.2″, E 127°11′31.6″), genitalia slide No. INU-11960; 1m#, 1f#, Munhye-ri 1277, Galmal-eup, Cheolwon-gun (N 38°09′11.60″, E 127°20′09.30″), genitalia slide No. INU-11961; 1m#, 1f#, Geumseong-ri, Hamra-myeon, Iksan-si (N 36°04′31.36″, E 126°54′44.05″) 19. V. 2017 (S.M. Na), genitalia slide No. INU-11587; 1m#, Hoban-ro, Wanggung-myeon, Iksan-si (N 35°59′56.09″, E 127°05′49.71″), 31. V. 2017 (S.M. Na), genitalia slide No. INU-11588; 1m#, Ungok-ri, Hwasan-myeon, Wanju-gun (N 36°02′55.63″, E 127°11′29.18″), 20. VII. 2017 (S.M. Na, H.K. Kim); 2f#, Geumseong-ri, Hamra-myeon, Iksan-si (N 36°04′27.38″, E 126°54′48.60″), 23. VIII. 2017 (S.M. Na, Y.B. Cha), genitalia slide Nos. INU-11955, -11957; 1f#, Chunsan-ri 793-1, Hwasan-myeon, Wanju-gun (N 36°04′26.35″, E 127°11′24.24″), 6. IX. 2017 (S.M. Na, J.H. Ko), genitalia slide No. INU-11595; 1f#, Mt. Baekunsan, Gwangyang-si, 25. VI. 1991 (S.B. Ahn), genitalia slide No. INU-11538 (INU). 1m#, 1f#, Namyang, Majeon, Chedongdo Is. (N 35°38′48.6″, E 128°51′50.1″, Alt: 178 m), 08. VII. 2013 (Lim, Lim, Oh, Go), genitalia slide No. INU-11959 (KNAE).
Description. Adult (Figure 1a–f). Wingspan 13–17 mm. Antenna bipectinate in male, filiform in female. Head ivory. Thorax white, except ivory patagium and tegula. Forewing. Ground color pale gray. Baso-costal patch narrow, elongate, pale brown. Antemedial line curved, dark brown, joined to rounded rectangular dark brown costal patch. Medio-costal patch triangular, dark brown with blackish distal and ventral margin. Postmedial line double, weakly dentate, inconspicuous; subterminal line wavy, rather diffuse. Terminal line narrow, pale brown. Hindwing. Ground color whitish-gray in basal half, distal half somewhat darker brownish-gray; discal spot narrow dash-like, dark gray. Abdomen dark brownish-gray.
Male genitalia (Figure 4a). Uncus reduced. Tegumen moderately long, narrow. Transtilla narrow, medially fused, weakly sclerotized. Dorsal lobe of valva spatulate; costal margin slightly concave, weakly sclerotized, apex dilated, broadly rounded, densely scobinate. Ventral lobe of valva narrower than dorsal lobe, with dorsal margin straight, membranous and ventral margin weakly sclerotized, gently concave; apex rounded with a short, acute spine medially. Harpe narrow, dagger-shaped. Sacculus short and stout. Juxta small, weakly sclerotized. Vinculum rounded rectangular; saccus short V-shaped. Aedeagus very short, moderately thick, slightly bent; vesica bearing long, stout, subapically slightly curved, apically pointed needle-like cornutus.
Female genitalia (Figure 5a,b). Papilla analis short, rounded trapezoidal, sparsely setose. Apophysis posterioris thin, pointed, somewhat longer than apophysis anterioris. Ostium bursae relatively broad, weakly sclerotized. Ductus bursae membranous, subostially with a short, sack-like lateral lobe, distal fifth infundibular, proximal third with a sclerotized ovoid bulge. Cervix bursae membranous, semi-spherical. Corpus bursae elongate-ovoid with a basally round, apically thorn-shaped signum.
Distribution. Korea, Russian Far East, Japan [3,4,5].
Host plant. Unknown.
Remarks. This species was firstly reported from Korea by Oh [3] as N. japonibia. Kim et al. [18] reported N. costimacula in Korea without any examined materials or references. However, as a result of this present study, we found that N. japonibia is a junior synonym of N. costimacula based on the examination of type materials of both species (Figure 1a,b), therefore the name N. japonibia is to be replaced by N. costimacula in the check list of the Korean Nolinae. Tshistjakov [4] incorrectly referred costimacula as a subspecies of N. innocua and listed Taiwan as one of the countries where the taxon is distributed, mentioning, however, that only the nominotypical subspecies occurs in the island. In his erroneous taxonomic concept, it meant that N. innocua innocua occurs in Taiwan, which is correct, but mentioning it under the taxon costimacula is rather confusing as the latter is not a member of the Taiwanese fauna.
2.
Nola innocua Butler, 1880
(Figure 2a–c, Figure 4b and Figure 5c,d)
Nola innocua Butler [20]: 671. Type locality: Formosa (Taiwan). Holotype: female, in coll. NHMUK.
Nola innocua Butler: László et al. [9]: 223.
Type material examined. Holotype of Nola innocua Butler, 1880: f#, red ring label “Type”/with handwritten “Takow Formosa H. E. Hobson 80–115”/“Formosa 80-115”/“Arctiidae genitalia slide No. 1778” (NHMUK) (Figure 2a and Figure 5c).
Aditional material examined.
Taiwan. 1 f#, Takow, Formosa, 8.ix.1904, leg. A.E. Wileman; 1 m#, same locality and collector, 14.viii.1906 (NHMUK); 1 f#, Prov. Ilan, 2 km N Suao, 130m, 01.vii.1996, leg. G. Csorba and L. Németh, gen. slide No. LGN 1903; 1 m#, Prov. Pingtung, 10 km E of Mutan, 400m, 12.vi.1997, leg. B. Herczig and L. Ronkay, gen. slide No. LGN 1902 (MWM/ZSM).
Description. Adult (Figure 2a–c). Wingspan 12–13 mm. Antenna bipectinate in male, filiform in female. Head ivory. Thorax off-white except ivory patagium and tegula. Forewing. Ground color pale brownish-gray. Baso-costal patch relatively extensive, dark brown with a blackish dash on ventral margin. Antemedial line dark brown, sharply angled medially, ending in a dark brown, ovoid subcostal patch. Medio-costal patch dark brown, quadrangular, larger than antemedial patch. Postmedial line double, inner line dentate, diffuse, outer line serrate, dark brown. Subterminal line irregularly wavy. Terminal line very narrow, pale grayish-brown. Hindwing. Ground color off-white in basal half, brownish-gray in apical half, discal spot absent. Abdomen pale gray.
Male genitalia (Figure 4b). Uncus reduced. Tegumen short and moderately broad. Transtilla weakly sclerotized, medially fused. Dorsal lobe of valva medially extremely narrow, stick-like, apically conspicuously spatulate. Ventral lobe of valva dorsally membranous, ventrally more heavily sclerotized, apically rounded bearing a short, acute ventro-apical spine. Harpe rather stout, digitiform, apically broadly rounded. Sacculus stout. Juxta weakly sclerotized, short, inverse-triangular. Vinculum broad, rounded rectangular; saccus short, strongly tapered. Aedeagus very short, conical with narrowly rounded apex; vesica armed with a massive, thick, strongly curved claw-like cornutus being as long as entire aedeagus.
Female genitalia (Figure 5c,d). Papilla analis short, rounded-trapezoidal, sparsely setose. Apophysis posterioris broad at base, medially tapered, apically pointed, 1.5 times longer than apophysis anterioris. Eighth sternite very short, distal margin concave, proximal margin almost straight. Ostium bursae broad, membranous; antrum sclerotized, short, plate-shaped. Distal section of ductus bursae with large, sclerotized, strongly curved lateral bulge, presumably serving as recipient sack of large cornutus during copulation; proximal section of ductus bursae short, relatively thick. Cervix bursae short, membranous. Corpus bursae elongate ovoid; signum bursae sickle-shaped with a blunt thorn postero-medially.
Distribution. Taiwan (endemic) [9].
Host plant. Unknown.
Remarks. Nola innocua was reported from Korea by Inoue [14]; however, this record proved to be based on a misidentification. The examinations of the holotype of N. innocua and further topotypical male and female specimens externally matching with the female primary type have revealed that ever since the publication of Moths of Japan [2], this species has been misidentified in the Far East. Consequently, the taxon which has long been treated as N. innocua is in fact an undescribed species, the description of which is given in this paper.
3.
Nola galliphaga sp. nov.
(Figure 3a–d, Figure 4c–d and Figure 6a–c)
Nola innocua Butler [20] sensu Inoue: Inoue [14]: 164; Inoue [2] I: 661, II: pls 137, 154, 352; Ito and Hattori [21]: 475; Oh [3]: 134; Kononenko and Han [13]: 68; Sasaki and Kishida [5]: 171; Kim et al. [18]: 141.
Type series. Holotype. f#, with handwritten “Mt. Takakuma, Kagoshima Pref., 28.IV.1968, H. Fukuda”/with printed “Inoue coll. BM 1992-71”, unique id. NHMUK 014173259, gen. slide No. NHMUK 010317817 (prepared by A. Volynkin) (NHMUK) (Figure 3a and Figure 6a).
Paratypes. Japan. 3 m#, 2 f#, with the same data as in the holotype, gen. slide Nos: Inoue 3455, 3402 (m#), Inoue 3456 (f#); 1 m#, Mokkokuyara, Tsushima, 7.iv.1973, leg. T. Watanabe, unique id. NHMUK 014173258, gen. slide No.: NHMUK 010317816 (prepared by A. Volynkin); 1 f#, same locality and collector, 7.ix.1973; 5 m#, 5 f#, Shitoko, Kamiyaku, Is. Yakushima, 30.iii.–1.iv.1971, coll. R. Sato and A. Seino, gen. slide Nos: Inoue 3921 (m#), 3919 (m#), 3922 (f#), NHMUK Arctiidae 1772 (m#), 1773 (f#); 1 f#, Mt. Zozu, Kagawa, 18.x.1968, leg. H. Toshima; 2 f#, same locality and collector, 18.vi.1968, 9.v.1964; 1 f#, Mizukami Vill., Kumamoto Pref., 25.iv.1960, leg. N. Tawara, gen. slide No.: Inoue 3403; 1 m#, Miyanoura, Is. Yakushima, 25-27.iii.1971, coll. A. Seino; 1 f#, Kojyaku Kitakyusyu, 3.vii.1965, leg. T. Kawamura; 2 f#, Kurio, Yaku, Is. Yakushima, 28-30.iii.1971, coll. R. Sato, gen. slide No.: Inoue 3920; 1 m#, Onoaida, Yakushima, 14.vi.1972, leg. T. Watanabe; 1 f#, Nashimoto, Shizuoka Ken, 24.x.1966, leg. T. Ebato, gen. slide No.: Inoue 3620; 1 m#, 1 f#, Nagoya City, Larva on 1.x.1981 from a gall of Monzenia globuli, leg. K. Ito, gen. slide No.: Inoue 16927 (m#), 16928 (f#); 1 m#, Kurio (x), Yakushima I. 4.iii.1973, leg. T. Watanabe, gen. slide No.: Inoue 16929; 1 f#, Yoshii-niachi, Ukiha-gun, Fukuoka Pref., 25.vii.1957, leg. N. Gyotoku, gen. slide No.: Inoue 5301 (NHMUK); 1 f#, Honshyu, Kogigatake, 1200m, Nara Pref., 30.vi.1970, leg. J. Razowski, gen. slide No.: RL 12335; 1 f#, Honshyu, Kiso-Fukush. 750m, Nagano Pref. 22.vi.1970, leg. J. Razowski (ISEZ).
South Korea. 1 f#, Andong, 3.VI.1970, leg. Inoue H., gen. slide No.: SH-175 (KNAE) (genitalia slide only); 3 m#, 6 f#, Prov. Cheju, 300m, Andok valley, 126°22′E, 33°22′N, 28.iv.1994, leg. Peregovits, Ronkay and Vojnits, No. 1682, gen. slide Nos: RL 12333 (m#), RL 12334 (f#), LGN 2198 (f#), LGN 2199 (f#) (HNHM).
Diagnosis. This new species is reminiscent of both N. innocua and N. costimacula, but it is distinguished by its markedly thicker and more evenly arched antemedial line, the smaller and more triangular medio-costal patch, the more sharply defined and more angled postmedial line of the forewing, and the small, rounded discal spot of the hindwing, which is dash-like in N. costimacula and absent in N. innocua. In addition, compared to N. innocua, N. galliphaga sp. nov. is considerably larger (the wingspan of the former species is 12–13 mm, that of the new species is 16–19 mm), while its ground color is darker than that of N. costimacula. Nevertheless, examination of the copulatory organ of these externally similar species provides the most reliable identification. Based on the configuration of the male genitalia, N. innocua belongs to a distinct lineage of Nola due to the highly modified, medially stalked, apically spatulate dorsal valval lobe and the massive, claw-like cornutus of the vesica excluding potential misidentification with any other Nola species. Compared the new species to N. costimacula, the differences between the two species’ genital capsule are more subtle expressed by the somewhat shorter tegumen and the basally broader, more curved harpe of N. galliphaga. However, the configuration of the aedeagus is strikingly different in the two species, being slightly longer and narrower with a thin, strongly curved cornutus in N. galliphaga, while the cornutus of N. costimacula is markedly more robust and almost straight. In the female genitalia, the new species has a more heavily sclerotized, longer antrum, markedly shorter and narrower ductus bursae lacking a bulge, a larger, more elongate corpus bursae with more pronounced cervix, and a larger medial process of the thorn-shaped signum compared to those of N. costimacula.
Description. Adult (Figure 3a–d). Wingspan 16–19 mm. Antenna bipectinate in male, filiform in female. Head ivory. Thorax whitish-gray except ivory patagium and tegula. Forewing. Ground color brownish-gray. Baso-costal patch narrow, dark brown. Antemedial line blackish, gently arched, rather broad at costal margin, fused with blackish, elongate-triangular antemedial costal patch, tapering towards anal margin. Medio-costal patch blackish, triangular. Postmedial line double, finely defined, inner line paler than outer one, dorsal section almost straight, ventral section angled inwards at vein CuA1; subterminal line wavy, diffuse. Hindwing. Ground color pale gray in basal half, darker brownish-gray distally; discal spot small, rounded, dark gray. Abdomen pale gray.
Male genitalia (Figure 4c,d). Uncus reduced. Tegumen moderately long, narrow. Transtilla weakly sclerotized, medially fused. Dorsal lobe of valva spatulate; costal margin almost straight, sclerotized, ventral margin membranous, postmedially concave; dorsal and distal margin of dilated apex evenly arcuate, ventrally straight. Ventral lobe of valva dorsally membranous, ventrally more heavily sclerotized with a narrow, heavily sclerotized longitudinal slat, apically rounded bearing a very short, acute spine. Harpe broad at base, abruptly tapered submedially, distal two-thirds very narrow, spine-like, rather pliant. Sacculus stout and short. Juxta very small, elongate-rectangular with a medio-distal notch. Vinculum short, rectangular; saccus V-shaped. Aedeagus tubular, short and narrow, subapically slightly dilated, with a thin, strongly curved hook-like cornutus.
Female genitalia (Figure 6a–c). Papilla analis short, rounded-trapezoidal, sparsely setose. Apophysis posterioris somewhat shorter than apophysis anterioris. Eighth sternite short, distal margin almost straight, proximal margin undulate with two short, rounded anterior projections. Ostium bursae more or less rectangular, strongly sclerotized. Antrum short, quadrangular, one side sclerotized, other side membranous; sclerotized side with a short, membranous, sack-like bulge. Ductus bursae short and narrow, membranous, slightly rugose. Cervix bursae membranous, dome-shaped. Corpus bursae elongate, utriform with a short thorn-shaped signum projecting from a semi-circular base.
Distribution. Korea, Japan.
Host plant. The species—identified formerly erroneously as N. innocua—was observed feeding on the galls of Nipponaphis distyliicola Monzen and Monzenia globuli (Monzen) aphids (Hemiptera), on Distylium racemosum Siebold and Zuccarini (Hamamelidaceae) as well as on the leaves of the same plant [21]. Two specimens reared from galls were traced in the Inoue collection housed in the NHMUK and their genital slides have proved their correct identity as N. galliphaga.
Remarks. Inoue [14] reported a single Korean female specimen from Andong, Gyeongsangbuk-do province without providing exact label data. Purportedly, this specimen might have been dissected by Oh [3], but the specimen itself seems to have been lost; only its genitalia slide has been traced. Nevertheless, the genital preparation shows characters identical to other female specimens of the new species collected in Japan. Consequently, the single genitalia slide extant in KNAE is recognized here as a paratype specimen. The Korean population of the species is supposedly also connected to D. racemosum and the galls of the two aphids as reported by Ito and Hattori [21]. Although these latter authors did not illustrate the moths, the result of present taxonomic study allowed us to infer that the species Ito and Hattori reported as N. innocua is undoubtedly N. galliphaga, as true N. innocua Butler is a species endemic to Taiwan.
Etymology. This species is named based on the peculiar feeding habit of the larva, making the new taxon a potential natural enemy of gall aphids.
Figure 1. Adult and label illustrations of Nola costimacula Staudinger, 1887: (a) N. costimacula, male, holotype, (MfN, gen. slide No. LGN 1226); (b) Ditto, female, holotype of Celama innocua var. japonibia Strand, 1920 (NHMUK, Arctiidae genitalia slide No. 1775); (c) Ditto, male, (INU, gen. slide No. INU-12308); (d) Ditto, female, identified as Nola japonibia ex coll. Inoue (NHMUK, Arctiidae genitalia slide No. 1818); (e) Ditto, male, (INU, gen. slide No. INU-11537); (f) Ditto, female, (INU, gen. slide No. INU-11587).
Figure 1. Adult and label illustrations of Nola costimacula Staudinger, 1887: (a) N. costimacula, male, holotype, (MfN, gen. slide No. LGN 1226); (b) Ditto, female, holotype of Celama innocua var. japonibia Strand, 1920 (NHMUK, Arctiidae genitalia slide No. 1775); (c) Ditto, male, (INU, gen. slide No. INU-12308); (d) Ditto, female, identified as Nola japonibia ex coll. Inoue (NHMUK, Arctiidae genitalia slide No. 1818); (e) Ditto, male, (INU, gen. slide No. INU-11537); (f) Ditto, female, (INU, gen. slide No. INU-11587).
Forests 13 01881 g001
Figure 2. Adult and label illustrations of Nola innocua Butler, 1880 (a) N. innocua, female, holotype (NHMUK, Arctiidae genitalia slide No. 1778); (b) Ditto, female, (NHMUK, gen. slide No. LGN 1903); (c) Ditto, male, (MWM/ZSM, gen. slide No. LGN 1902).
Figure 2. Adult and label illustrations of Nola innocua Butler, 1880 (a) N. innocua, female, holotype (NHMUK, Arctiidae genitalia slide No. 1778); (b) Ditto, female, (NHMUK, gen. slide No. LGN 1903); (c) Ditto, male, (MWM/ZSM, gen. slide No. LGN 1902).
Forests 13 01881 g002
Figure 3. Adult and label illustrations of Nola galliphaga sp. nov.: (a) N. galliphaga sp. nov., female, holotype (NHMUK, unique id. NHMUK 014173259, gen. slide No. NHMUK 010317817); (b) Ditto, male, paratype (NHMUK, Inoue genitalia slide 3921); (c) Ditto, female, paratype (HNHM); (d) Ditto, female, paratype (HNHM, gen. slide No. LGN 2199).
Figure 3. Adult and label illustrations of Nola galliphaga sp. nov.: (a) N. galliphaga sp. nov., female, holotype (NHMUK, unique id. NHMUK 014173259, gen. slide No. NHMUK 010317817); (b) Ditto, male, paratype (NHMUK, Inoue genitalia slide 3921); (c) Ditto, female, paratype (HNHM); (d) Ditto, female, paratype (HNHM, gen. slide No. LGN 2199).
Forests 13 01881 g003
Figure 4. Male genitalia of Nola spp: (a) N. costimacula, holotype (MfN, gen. slide No. LGN 1226); (b) N. innocua, (NHMUK, gen. slide No. LGN 1902) (c) N. galliphaga sp. nov., paratype (NHMUK, gen. slide No. NHMUK 010317816); (d) ditto, paratype (HNHM, gen. slide No. RL 12333).
Figure 4. Male genitalia of Nola spp: (a) N. costimacula, holotype (MfN, gen. slide No. LGN 1226); (b) N. innocua, (NHMUK, gen. slide No. LGN 1902) (c) N. galliphaga sp. nov., paratype (NHMUK, gen. slide No. NHMUK 010317816); (d) ditto, paratype (HNHM, gen. slide No. RL 12333).
Forests 13 01881 g004
Figure 5. Female genitalia of Nola spp: (a) N. costimacula, holotype of Celama innocua var. japonibia (NHMUK, Arctiidae genitalia slide No. 1775); (b) ditto, ex coll. Inoue (NHMUK, Arctiidae genitalia slide No. 1818); (c) N. innocua, holotype (NHMUK, Arctiidae genitalia slide No. 1778); (d) ditto, (MWM/ZSM, gen. slide No. LGN 1903).
Figure 5. Female genitalia of Nola spp: (a) N. costimacula, holotype of Celama innocua var. japonibia (NHMUK, Arctiidae genitalia slide No. 1775); (b) ditto, ex coll. Inoue (NHMUK, Arctiidae genitalia slide No. 1818); (c) N. innocua, holotype (NHMUK, Arctiidae genitalia slide No. 1778); (d) ditto, (MWM/ZSM, gen. slide No. LGN 1903).
Forests 13 01881 g005
Figure 6. Female genitalia of Nola galliphaga sp. nov.: (a) N. galliphaga sp. nov. holotype (NHMUK, gen. slide No. NHMUK 010317817); (b) ditto, paratype (HNHM, gen. slide No. RL12334; (c) ditto, paratype (KNAE, genitalia slide No. SH-175).
Figure 6. Female genitalia of Nola galliphaga sp. nov.: (a) N. galliphaga sp. nov. holotype (NHMUK, gen. slide No. NHMUK 010317817); (b) ditto, paratype (HNHM, gen. slide No. RL12334; (c) ditto, paratype (KNAE, genitalia slide No. SH-175).
Forests 13 01881 g006

4. Discussion

The detailed morphological analyses of the primary types and additional specimens of three East-Asian Nola species have shed light on long-standing taxonomic misinterpretations of Nola costimacula, N. innocua and N. japonibia. The species, which has long been treated as N. innocua, has proved to be an undescribed species, described here as N. galliphaga, showing a closer kinship to N. costimacula. The true Nola innocua has highly distinctive genitalia features without any known closer relative and has hitherto been only recorded from Taiwan suggesting that the species is endemic to the island. The new species has been reported to feed on galls of two aphid species (Nipponaphis distyliicola Monzen and Monzenia globuli (Monzen)), and also on their host plant Distylium racemosum Siebold and Zuccarini. Consequently, this new species could potentially be a natural enemy of some aphid pests in forests. Nevertheless, those full of morphologic evidence, the additional molecular study will need in near future. Many recent molecular studies revealed numerous cryptic and misidentified species. In this reason, molecular study for those of this species, and also other nolid species are necessary. However, in this study, the authors focused on the morphologies, that those species have noticeable characteristics.

5. Conclusions

The results of this study demonstrate that in-depth revisional research is still essential to clarify the identity and distribution of species of poorly studied Lepidoptera groups such as Nolinae. This current study clarified the erroneous taxonomy of three East Asian Nola taxa resulting in the discovery of a new species occurring in Japan and Korea. Similar studies are still required to elucidate further taxonomic problems in the Nolinae of the Far East and even discoveries of further new species cannot be ruled out.
It would also be important to obtain further information of the biology of these predominantly arboreal species which could bring surprising discoveries regarding their potential economic utilization. In our study, the newly described Nola species has been revealed as a potential natural enemy of gall-inducing aphids as it was reported by Ito and Hattori [21] although they attributed the observed behavior to the misidentified N. innocua. Behavioral studies and breeding experiments addressed to the early stages of noline moths may reveal further species with similar tendencies, rendering them potential natural enemies of forest pests.

Author Contributions

Y.-B.C.: conceptualization, investigation, resources, original draft preparation, project administration, funding acquisition. U.B.: conceptualization, original draft preparation, review and editing, funding acquisition. G.M.L.: investigation, resources, data curation, review and editing, funding acquisition. G.R.: investigation, resources, data curation, review and editing, funding acquisition. L.R.: investigation, resources, data curation, review and editing. Y.-S.B.: resources, review and editing, project administration, funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Biological Resources (NIBR), funded by the Ministry of Environment (MOE) of the Republic of Korea (NIBR202231206) and by the Priority Research Centers Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (2020R1A6A1A03041954). This study was carried out with the support of R&D Program for Forest Science Technology (Project No. 2017042B10-2223-CA01) provided by Korea Forest Service (Korea Forestry Promotion Institute). This research received support also from the SyntheSys Project http://www.synthesys.info/ (accessed on 7 November 2022) which is financed by European Community Research Infrastructure Action under FP6 “Structuring the European Research Area” Programme, grant Nos GB-TAF-2644 (G. Ronkay) and GB-TAF-5432 (Gy. M. László).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We are greatful to the Animal Diversity laboratory team, T.G. Lee, C.M. Jang, H. Kim, J.N. Kim, and S.H. Choi (Incheon National University, Incheon, Republic of Korea). Gy.M.L, G.R., and L.R. are indebted to the following for their extensive help provided during the preparation of this study: Thomas J. Witt (†), Axel Hausmann (MWM/ZSM, Munich), Wolfram Mey, Théo Léger (MfN, Berlin), Martin Honey, Alberto Zilli and Geoff Martin (NHMUK, London). Martin Lödl and Sabine Gaal-Haszler (NHMW, Vienna) are thanked for the opportunity of using the microphotography equipment in their institution. Our special thanks go to Anton Volynkin for dissecting specimens and imaging the slides of N. galliphaga in the NHMUK. Type specimen images are used with permission and are copyright of the Museum für Naturkunde, Berlin and the Trustees of the Natural History Museum, London and made available under Creative Commons License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hacker, H.; Schreier, H.P.; Goater, B. Revision of the tribe Nolini of Africa and the Western Palaearctic Region (Lepidoptera, Noctuoidea, Noctuidae, Nolinae). Esperiana 2012, 17, 7–612. [Google Scholar]
  2. Inoue, H. Nolidae. In Moths of Japan I & II; Inoue, H., Sugi, S., Kuroko, H., Moriuti, S., Kawabe, A., Eds.; Kodansha: Tokyo, Japan, 1982. [Google Scholar]
  3. Oh, S.-H. A review of the subfamily Nolinae (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) in Korea (I): Genus Nola Leech. Insecta Koreana 2001, 18, 123–137. [Google Scholar]
  4. Tshistjakov, Y.A. A review of the subfamily Nolinae of the Russian Far East. Far East. Entomol. 2008, 185, 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  5. Sasaki, A.; Kishida, Y. Nolidae. In The Standard of Moths in Japan II; Kishida, Y., Ed.; Gakken Education Publishing: Tokyo, Japan, 2011; pp. 170–189. [Google Scholar]
  6. Beljaev, E.; Anikin, V.; Baryshnikova, S.; Dubatolov, V.; Efetov, K.; Zolotuhin, V.; Kovtunovich, V.; Kozlov, M.; Kononenko, V.; Lvovsky, A. Annotated Catalogue of the Insects of Russian Far East. Volume II. Lepidoptera; Dalnauka: Vladivostok, Russia, 2016; p. 812. [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen, Z.J.; Zhang, B.B.; Hu, Y.Q. New records of the genus Nola Leach, 1815 (Lepidoptera, Nolidae, Nolinae) from China, with description of a new species. Zootaxa 2022, 5124, 245–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Bálint, Z.; Benedek, B.; Csővári, T. Contribution to the knowledge of the Macrolepidopteran fauna of Mongolia. Folia Entomol. Hung. 2006, 67, 93–108. [Google Scholar]
  9. László, G.M.; Ronkay, G.; Ronkay, L. Taxonomic studies on the genus Nola Leach, 1815 (Lepidoptera, Noctuoidea, Nolidae, Nolini) with description of 33 new species from Asia. Fibigeriana Suppl. Book Ser. Taxon. Faun. 2014, 2, 201–228. [Google Scholar]
  10. Hu, Y.-Q.; Wang, M.; Han, H.L. Two new species and five new records of Nola Leach, [1815] (Lepidoptera, Nolidae, Nolinae) from China. Zootaxa 2015, 3920, 483–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Joshi, R.; Singh, N.; Kuni, N. A catalogue of Nolidae Bruand, 1846 from India (Lepidoptera, Noctuoidea). Zootaxa 2021, 5034, 1–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. László, G.M.; Sterling, M. Illustrated checklist of Nolinae (Lepidoptera, Nolidae) of Hong Kong, China, with description of two new species. Ecol. Montenegrina 2020, 33, 35–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kononenko, V.S.; Han, H.-L. Atlas Genitalia of Noctuidae in Korea (Lepidoptera). In Insects of Korea [11]; Park, K.-T., Ed.; Junghaeng-sa: Seoul, Korea, 2007; pp. 1–464. [Google Scholar]
  14. Inoue, H. Some new and unrecorded moths belonging to the familes of Bombyces and Sphinges from Japan. Bull. Fac. Domest. Sci. Otsuma Women’s Univ. 1976, 12, 153–179. [Google Scholar]
  15. Staudinger, O. Neue Arten und Varietäten von Lepidopteren aus dem Amur—Gebiete. In Mémoires sur les Lépidoptères; Romanoff, N.M., Ed.; M.M. Stassuléwitch: St.-Pétersbourg, Russia, 1887; Volume III, pp. 126–232. [Google Scholar]
  16. Hampson, G.F. Catalogue of the Arctiadæ (Nolinæ, Lithosianæ) in the Collection of the British Museum; British Museum: London, UK, 1900. [Google Scholar]
  17. Strand, E. Arctiidae: Subfam. Nolinae; W. Junk: Berlin, Germany, 1920. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kim, S.-S.; Choi, S.-W.; Kononenko, V.; Schintlmeister, A.; Sohn, J.-C. Revised List of the Korean Noctuoidea Based on Latest Classification. Entomol. Res. Bull. 2016, 32, 138–160. [Google Scholar]
  19. Poole, R.W. Noctuidae. Lepidopterorum Catalogus. (New Series, Fascicle 118); E.J.Brill: Leiden, The Netherlands, 1989; Volume 1–3, pp. 1–1314. [Google Scholar]
  20. Butler, A.G. On a second Collection of Lepidoptera made in Formosa. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 1880, 1880, 666–691. [Google Scholar]
  21. Ito, Y.; Hattori, I. A kleptoparasitic moth, Nola innocua, attacking aphid galls. Ecol.Entomol. 1982, 7, 475–478. [Google Scholar]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cha, Y.-B.; Bayarsaikhan, U.; László, G.M.; Ronkay, G.; Ronkay, L.; Bae, Y.-S. Elucidation of the Taxonomy of Three Problematic East Asian Nola Leach, 1815, with Description of a New Species (Lepidoptera, Nolidae, Nolinae). Forests 2022, 13, 1881. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13111881

AMA Style

Cha Y-B, Bayarsaikhan U, László GM, Ronkay G, Ronkay L, Bae Y-S. Elucidation of the Taxonomy of Three Problematic East Asian Nola Leach, 1815, with Description of a New Species (Lepidoptera, Nolidae, Nolinae). Forests. 2022; 13(11):1881. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13111881

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cha, Yeong-Bin, Ulziijargal Bayarsaikhan, Gyula M. László, Gábor Ronkay, László Ronkay, and Yang-Seop Bae. 2022. "Elucidation of the Taxonomy of Three Problematic East Asian Nola Leach, 1815, with Description of a New Species (Lepidoptera, Nolidae, Nolinae)" Forests 13, no. 11: 1881. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13111881

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop