Next Article in Journal
Climatic and Topographical Effects on the Spatiotemporal Variations of Vegetation in Hexi Corridor, Northwestern China
Previous Article in Journal
Helminth Community of the Black Margate Anisotremus surinamensis (Teleostei: Haemulidae), from Coral Reefs off the Veracruz Coast, Mexico, Southern Gulf of Mexico
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Cytochrome Oxidase Subunit II: Potential Marker for the Identification of Forensically Significant Species of Coleoptera—A Preliminary Study

1
Department of Zoology & Environmental Sciences, Punjabi University, Patiala 147001, India
2
Department of Molecular Biology & Biochemistry, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar 143005, India
3
Department of Biotechnology and Microbiology, Dr. Janaki Ammal Campus, Kannur University, Palavad, Thalassery 670661, India
4
Department of Biology, College of Science, Imam Abulrahman Bin Faisal University, P.O. Box 1982, Dammam 31441, Saudi Arabia
5
Biology Department, College of Science, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 71491, Saudi Arabia
6
Department of Science and Technology, University College-Ranyah, Taif University, B.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia
7
Department of Botany, Hindu College Moradabad, Mahatma Jyotiba Phule Rohilkhand University, Bareilly 244001, India
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diversity 2022, 14(5), 369; https://doi.org/10.3390/d14050369
Submission received: 5 March 2022 / Revised: 2 May 2022 / Accepted: 3 May 2022 / Published: 6 May 2022

Abstract

:

Summary

We collected and identified beetles belonging to different species of Coleoptera that are of forensic importance in India by employing cytochrome oxidase subunit II. An attempt was made to create a molecular database of the reference sequences, as most of the studied species were not available in online databases. Sequences obtained from the present work will contribute to the creation of a national database, allowing for an increase in the knowledge of Coleoptera species of forensic interest.

Abstract

The foremost concern in forensic entomology is the explicit identification of the species recovered from the crime scene. From the different orders of insects, Diptera is the prime focus in this field, followed by Coleoptera, whose identification can be extremely helpful for corpses in later decomposition stages. In this study, cytochrome oxidase subunit II (COII) was used to check its adequacy as a genetic marker and to create a reference database for eleven species belonging to five families of Coleoptera, namely, Silphidae, Staphylinidae, Histeridae, Dermestidae and Scarabaeidae, from two different states in India to assist in the accurate identification of imperative beetle species in medico-legal entomology. To achieve this, standard protocols of DNA isolation, amplification and sequencing were followed. We concluded that the COII gene can be used as a molecular marker for the identification of forensically relevant species, as observed from the similarities between the phylogenetic relationship constructed by COII and morphological data.

1. Introduction

In forensic entomology, estimation of the minimum postmortem interval (mPMI) is an essential component in the investigation of unnatural death [1] and the accurate identification of an insect specimen is usually the most crucial step in forensic entomological analysis for mPMI estimation [2]. For this estimation, fast and accurate species identification is needed, which poses a problem for forensic investigators [3]. Although identification keys are available, only a few experts can identify the immature stages of forensically relevant insects up to the species level, whereas the time-consuming rearing of larvae to adults for identification may delay the criminal investigation. In recent years, the use of DNA has been popularized due to its specificity, especially mitochondrial DNA. Wells and Williams [4] validated molecular methods for the identification of blow flies of Calliphoridae Chrysomyinae. They performed a phylogenetic analysis of mitochondrial gene for cytochrome oxidase one (COI). COI sequences were obtained from 245 newly sequenced specimens and 51 specimens from the literature. They validated this molecular marker as an accurate and vigorous technique for insect identification. However, to select a molecular marker, it is important that the chosen fragment is easy to isolate and amplify and has a mutation rate fast enough to allow for species discrimination, but sufficiently slow to minimize intraspecific variation [5,6]. Cytochrome oxidase II sequence analysis offers ample phylogenetically informative nucleotide substitutions that facilitate the identification of Coleoptera at the species level.
Out of the two most forensically important orders, most of the research has focused on flies, as they are early colonizers on a corpse, and beetles (Coleoptera) have been under-emphasized [3], although they are the second-largest order of forensic interest [7,8] and can support the mPMI estimation along with Diptera data [9]. Coleoptera are very diverse, both taxonomically and ecologically; little molecular knowledge is available about this group [10]. Some molecular studies have been conducted on beetles in the forensic context using various markers such as COI, COII, 16s rRNA, ITS 2 and cytochrome b [7,8,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. Most of these studies were based upon COI, given that it is highly conserved at the species level. A few coleopteran species, which are detritivorous in nature, contribute to the decay of a corpse in the case of mummification. Therefore, they provide the main entomological evidence when the skeletonized corpse is found [11].
In India, forensic entomology is a growing field, with most studies concentrating on insect succession, along with their composition, development, and toxicology, with few studies being related to the actual case studies. The molecular approach is limited to Diptera identification [20,21,22,23,24] to the best of our knowledge. Although the COI gene is the most widely used tool in the identification of sibling and cryptic species, phylogenetic relationships based on the COII gene were found to be more consistent with the morphological data, which made this gene a reliable molecular marker [25]. The present study was, therefore, concentrated on the DNA-based identification of forensically important beetles from India and the creation of a COII gene database to aid in future forensic investigations and research.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Specimen Collection

This study included 150 specimens of 10 species belonging to 8 genera and 5 families of the order Coleoptera (Table 1 and Figure 1. All the adult specimens were collected from five districts in the Northern Indian states of Himachal Pradesh and Punjab (Figure 2), either by placing bait traps or from dead animal farms. Dead animal farms are the open-space areas used to dispose animal carcasses, mostly cattle, where various tasks such as the skinning of carcasses and cleaning of bones are carried out. Prior to molecular study, specimens were identified with the help of various morphological keys to validate that molecular identification is accurate [26,27,28,29,30,31,32]. Specimens were stored in 95% alcohol. From 8 to 10 specimens per species were utilized for DNA extraction, except for Necrophila (Calosilpha) ioptera, Necrophila (Calosilpha) cyvaniventris and Creophilus flavipennis, for which only 2–3 specimens were available.

2.2. DNA Extraction

Genomic DNA was extracted from adult beetles by 2% CTAB method [33] with some modifications, which mostly included a change in the quantity of reagents used during extraction. For large specimens, legs were used for DNA extraction, while in the case of small specimens, the whole specimen, excluding abdomen, was used.

2.3. DNA Amplification and Sequencing

Mitochondrial COII gene sequences were amplified with the aid of primers from DNA isolated from different beetle species. The details of the forward and reverse primers used are given in Table 2. Each PCR cocktail consisted of 4 μL of 10X of Taq Buffer, 1.6 μL of MgCl2 (50 mM), 3.2 μL of dNTPs (10 mM), 0.6 μL of each primer (10 pmol/µL), 2 μL of DNA template (10–20 ng), and the rest was double-distilled water, to obtain a final volume of 40 μL. All DNA amplifications were carried out in a thermal cycler (Biometra, Göttingen, Germany) using the PCR conditions, including initial denaturation at 94 °C (5 min), followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C (60 s), annealing at 45 °C (45 s) and extension at 72 °C (60 s). Final extension of amplified products was carried out at 72 °C (7 min) to complete the reaction. The amplified products were first cleaned with Gel/PCR DNA fragments extraction kit (Cat.No. IB47020) following manufacturer’s protocol in order to preserve the quality and quantity of DNA, and were sent to Chromous Biotech. Pvt. Ltd. (Bengaluru, India) for sequencing. The crude sequences were aligned in BioEdit Sequence Alignment Editor; after eliminating noise, sequences were submitted to GenBank using the BankIt submission tool.

2.4. Phylogenetic Analysis

All sequences were aligned in Clustal Omega software(Version:1.2.2., European Bioinformatics Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom [36] and compared with the available reference sequences in GenBank maintained by NCBI by using BLAST to confirm the identification carried out with the help of traditional methods. Non-overlapping regions of the sequences were trimmed, and aligned sequences were used for pairwise divergence and phylogenetic analysis in Mega6 [37]. Neighbor-joining (NJ), a distance-based method, and maximum likelihood (ML), a character-based method, were used to study the lineage history using the Kimura-2-parameter model [38]. For all the methods, bootstrap values were calculated with 1000 replicates [34] to test the reliability of the derived trees. Two species from suborder Adephaga, viz. Anisodactylus poeciloides (EU839552.1) and Dyschirius salinus (EU839539.1), were taken as outgroups.

3. Results

3.1. Amplification of Mitochondrial COII Gene

The amplification of mitochondrial COII gene obtained a product of ~780 bp (Figure 2). The COII gene sequences from different beetles were aligned with NCBI, which suggested that the beetles belong to 11 different species with five distinct families. The respective accession numbers for the COII gene sequence of each beetle was obtained from NCBI (Table 1).

3.2. Divergence and Nucleotide Composition

Conspecifics showed <3% divergence (range: 0–2.8%). For some species, such as Necrophila (Calosilpha) ioptera, Necrophila (Calosilpha) cyvaniventris and Creophilus flavipennis, single sequences were present; hence, it was impossible to determine the intraspecific variation (Table 3).
The lowest divergence of 0.6% was observed between Creophilus maxillosus (MG958645) and C. maxillosus (GQ118443.1) submitted from China. Dermestes maculatus (MG891837) sequences from the present study showed a variation of 1.5% with D. maculatus (NC_037200.1) submitted from South Korea. The highest intraspecific divergence (2.8%) was found between Aleochara nigra (MG958643) of the present study and A. nigra (AJ293051.1) submitted from Taiwan.
The interspecific divergence among the beetle species varied from 4.7 to 9.7% Due to the lack of GenBank data for many studied species, interspecific divergence was only studied for six species. Necrophila (Deutosilpha) rufithorax was compared with Necrophila (Calosilpha) ioptera and Necrophila (Calosilpha) cyvaniventris and a divergence of 7.3% and 8.3% was found; Necrophila (Calosilpha) ioptera and Necrophila (Calosilpha) cyvaniventris showed a divergence of 6.5% (Table 4).
Creophilus flavipennis (MG940970) of the present study and Creophilus maxillosus (GQ118443.1) submitted from China showed 8.9% divergence, while C. maxillosus (MG958645) and C. flavipennis (MG940970) showed a variation of 9.7%.
Three sequences of Onthophagus cervus were compared with Onthophagus cf. taurinus (KU739462.1) submitted from Cambodia, and Onthophagus obscurior (KU739477.1) from Indonesia. Interspecific divergence ranged from a minimum of 4.7% (O.cervus and O. taurinus) to a maximum of 9.6% (O.cervus and O. obscurior). As for the nucleotide composition, the obtained sequences were AT-rich, with an average AT of 75.10% and GC of 24.90%, in accordance with previous studies conducted on the COII gene of beetles [13,35]. AT bias was observed in all the positions, but was most extreme in the third position (A = 38.6% and T = 44%).

3.3. Phylogenetic Analysis

The evolutionary history of the studied taxa was inferred using neighbour joining and maximum likelihood methods, which resulted in congruent trees. Phylogenetic trees (Figure 3 and Figure 4 showed the formation of four major monophyletic clades. The grouping of all species of family Staphylinidae under study in a single clade was observed. As for Creophilus flavipennis, phylogeny allows for confirmation at the genus level. Conspecifics belonging to the genus Onthophagus formed a separate cluster, showing a close relationship with other congeneric species. The species of the Silphidae family were assembled in a single clade, while Saprinus interruptus formed a separate clade. No reference sequence of S. interruptus was found for comparison, and this is the first report of the COII gene of S. interruptus, so their morphological identification was considered accurate.

4. Discussion

Our study is the first attempt at the molecular identification of forensically relevant beetle species from northern India. The present study aimed to generate a mitochondrial COII gene molecular database of forensically important beetles, which could be of great value to the field of forensic entomology, as they all share a common habitat of decaying organic matter. The similarity between the classical morphological taxonomy and molecular phylogeny in this study validates the COII gene as a potential marker to distinguish between species, as the phylogenetic relationships reconstructed with the help of COII were found to be similar to the morphological data.
According to Hebert et al. [39], intraspecific variation should not exceed 3%, while interspecific variation needs to exceed that threshold value to allow for species differentiation. We found low intraspecific and high interspecific divergences for all the species and no overlap between intraspecific and interspecific divergences. Hence, it is safe to assume that the COII gene sequences have sufficient discriminatory power for accurate species identification. As far as phylogeny is concerned, data were analyzed using the two most frequent methods and a similar topology was observed among the trees, with slight differences in bootstrap values. The small size of our data, and the lack of enough data from GenBank, made it impossible to infer any conclusions related to barcoding gaps.
Most of the clades in our analysis form distinguished branches with a bootstrap value of >90% at family level. At the genus or species level, some of the bootstrap values were below 50, but species were correctly assigned to their genus, with only one exception, Silphidae, for which further research is needed. An important caveat in insect molecular identification is that entire insect biomes can be affected by disruptive Wolbachia genetic expression and horizontal gene transfer (HGT), leading to instability. In a study by Whiteworth et al. [40], they noticed 12 species of the blow-fly of genus Protocalliphora, known to be infected with the endosymbiotic bacteria Wolbachia. They found that the barcoding approach showed very limited success in accurate species identification for 60% of the species. This very low success rate of the barcoding approach is due to the non-monophyly of many of the species at the mitochondrial level. Wolbachia is known to infect between 15 and 75% of insect species; therefore, identification at the species level based on mitochondrial sequence might not be possible for many insect species.

5. Conclusions

COII gene sequence analysis has the power to accurately delimit species; however, a lot of work is needed to create a database for distinct families of forensically important insects. To achieve this, multiple specimens of a species should be studied, using efficient methods for DNA extraction and amplification, as well as the sequencing of different gene/molecular markers. Developing suitable amplification methods and integrated identification protocols is in the best interest of forensic entomology. More extensive studies, with a larger COII gene sample size, are needed to explore this marker’s usefulness in insect identification in forensic entomology. Having numerous sequences in the Gen bank is a powerful tool in forensic entomology.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.B. and N.S.; data collection, N.S.; methodology, A.K.K., D.S. and N.S.; supervision, M.B.; draft preparation, N.S.; review and editing, M.B., A.K.K., M.A.A., S.S., N.M.A. and M.J.A., funding acquisition, M.A.A. and S.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

We extend our gratitude to the INSPIRE Fellowship (IF 130981), Department of Science & Technology, Government of India along with Taif University Researches Supporting Project number (TURSP-2020/92), Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

We give our appreciation to Tomas Lackner (Zoologische Staatssammlung München, Germany), Pakel Jakubec (Czech University of Life Sciences Prague) and Devanshu Gupta (Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata) for their help in identification of Histeridae, Silpidae and Scarabaeidae. Also, authors would like to thank Taif University Researches Supporting Project number (TURSP-2020/92), Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Amendt, J.; Richard, C.S.; Campobasso, C.P.; Zehner, R.; Hall, M.J.R. Forensic Entomology: Applications and Limitations. Forensic Sci. Med. Pathol. 2011, 7, 379–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Catts, E.P.; Goff, M.L. Forensic entomology in criminal investigations. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1992, 37, 253–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Midgley, J.M.; Richards, C.S.; Villet, M.H. The Utility of Coleoptera in Forensic Investigations. In Current Concepts in Forensic Entomology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; pp. 57–68. [Google Scholar]
  4. Wells, J.D.; Williams, D.W. Validation of a DNA-based method for identifying Chrysomyinae (Diptera, Calliphoridae) used in death investigations. Int. J. Legal Med. 2007, 121, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Blaxter, M.L. The promise of DNA taxonomy. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 2004, 359, 669–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Waugh, J. DNA barcoding in animal species: Progress, potential and pitfalls. BioEssays 2007, 29, 188–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Lopes, S.F.T. Forensic Entomology: DNA Barcoding for Coleoptera Identification. Master’s Dissertation, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  8. Almeida, L.M.; Mise, K.M. Diagnosis and key of the main families and species of South American Coleoptera of forensic importance. Rev. Bras. Entomol. 2009, 53, 227–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Goff, M.L.; Flynn, M.M. Determination of postmortem interval by arthropod succession: A case study from Hawaiian Islands. J. Forensic Sci. 1991, 36, 607–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Schilthuizen, M.; Scholte, C.; Van Wijk, R.E.J.; Dommershuijzen, J.; Van der Horst, D.; Zu Schlochtern, M.M.; Lievers, R.; Groenenberg, D.S.J. Using DNA-barcoding to make the necrobiont beetle family Cholevidae accessible for forensic entomology. Forensic Sci. Int. 2011, 210, 91–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Schroeder, H.; Klotzbach, H.; Oesterhelweg, L.; Puschel, K. Larder beetles (Coleoptera, Dermestidae) as an accelerating factor for decomposition of human corpse. Forensic Sci. Int. 2002, 127, 231–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhuang, Q.; Cai, J.; Zhang, M.; Feng, H.; Guo, Y.; Lan, L.; Chen, Y. Molecular identification of forensically significant beetles (Coleoptera) in China based on COI gene. Rev. Colomb. Entomol. 2011, 37, 95–102. [Google Scholar]
  13. Dobler, S.; Muller, J.K. Resolving phylogeny at the Family Level by Mitochondrial Cytochrome Oxidase Sequences: Phylogeny of Carrion Beetles (Coleoptera, Silphidae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2000, 15, 390–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. DiZinno, J.A.; Lord, W.D.; Collins-Morton, M.B.; Wilson, M.R.; Goff, M.L. Mitochondrial DNA sequencing of beetle larvae (Nitidulidae: Omosita) recovered from human bone. J. Forensic Sci. 2002, 47, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ferreira, S.; Oliveira, A.R.; Farinha, A.; Rebelo, M.T.; Dias, D. Forensic entomology: Nuclear and mitochondrial markers for Diptera and Coleoptera identification. Forensic Sci. Int. 2011, 3, e174–e175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Su, R.N.; Guo, Y.D.; Xie, D.; Peng, Y.L.; Cai, J.F.; Hua, F.; Sheng, L.H. Identification of forensically important beetles (Coleoptera: Histeridae) in China based on 16S rRNA and Cyt b. Trop. Biomed. 2013, 30, 375–387. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  17. Mashaly, A.M.; Al-Ajmi, R.A.; Al-Johani, H.A. Molecular identification of carrion beetles (Coleoptera) in selected regions of Saudi Arabia. J. Med. Entomol. 2018, 55, 1423–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Alajmi, R.; Abdel-Gaber, R.; Haddadi, R. Molecular identification of forensically important beetles in Saudi Arabia based on mitochondrial 16 s rRNA gene. Entomol. Res. 2020, 50, 343–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jang, H.; Shin, S.E.; Youm, K.J.; Karagozlu, M.Z.; Kim, C.B.; Ko, K.S.; Park, S.H. Molecular Identification of Necrophagous Dermestes Species in South Korea Using Cytochrome c Oxidase Subunit I Nucleotide Sequences (Genus Dermestes). J. Forensic Sci. 2020, 65, 283–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Sharma, M.; Singh, D.; Sharma, A.K. Mitochondrial DNA based identification of forensically important Indian flesh flies (Diptera: Sarcophagidae). Forensic Sci. Int. 2015, 247, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sharma, M.; Singh, D.; Sharma, A.K. Cytochrome Oxidase I gene-based identification of forensically important species of Indian flesh flies (Diptera: Sarcophagidae). J. Entomol. Res. 2016, 40, 195–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Khullar, N.; Singh, D.; Jha, C.K. Short COI marker: A valuable tool for identification and phylogenetic analysis of 6 forensically important blowfly species from India. J. Entomol. Zool. Stud. 2016, 4, 27–31. [Google Scholar]
  23. Khullar, N.; Singh, D.; Jha, C.K. Phylogenetic characterization of some species of family Calliphoridae using COII gene marker. Int. J. Entomol. Res. 2017, 2, 79–82. [Google Scholar]
  24. Bharti, M.; Singh, B. DNA-Based Identification of forensically important blow flies (Diptera: Calliphoridae) from India. J. Med. Entomol. 2017, 54, 1151–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Wang, D.; Li, C.; Zheng, W.; Song, F.; Guo, X.; Wu, Z.; Luo, P.; Yang, Y.; He, L.; Zhao, T. A evalution of the suitability of COI and COII gene variation for reconstructing the phylogeny of, and identifying cryptic species in, anopheline mosquito (Diptera Culicidae). Mitochondrial DNA 2017, 28, 769–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Schawaller, V.W. Taxonomie und Faunistik der Gattung Thanatophilus (Coleoptera: Silphidae). Stuttg. Beitr. Naturkd. 1981, 351, 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  27. Ruzicka, J.; Schneider, J. Faunistic records of Silphidae from China. Klapalekiana 1996, 32, 77–83. [Google Scholar]
  28. Ruzicka, J.; Schneider, J. Distributional records of carrion beetles (Coleoptera: Silphidae) from Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan and north-western India. Klapalekiana 2002, 38, 213–225. [Google Scholar]
  29. Ruzicka, J.; Schneider, J. Revision of Palaearctic and Oriental Necrophila Kirby & Spence, part 1: Subgenus Deutosilpha Portevin (Coleoptera: Silphidae). Zootaxa 2011, 2987, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  30. Ruzicka, J.; Hava, J.; Schneider, J. Taxonomical and distribution notes on Oriental Silphidae, with description of Nicrophorus sausai sp. n. (Insecta: Coleoptera). Reichenbachia 2000, 33, 377–384. [Google Scholar]
  31. Ruzicka, J.; Qubaiova, J.; Nishikawa, M.; Schneider, J. Revision of Palearctic and Oriental Necrophila Kirby et Spence, part 3: Subgenus Calosilpha Portevin (Coleoptera: Silphidae: Silphinae). Zootaxa 2015, 4013, 451–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ruzicka, J.; Sipkova, H.; Schneider, J. Notes on carrion beetles (Coleoptera: Silphidae) from India. Klapalekiana 2011, 47, 239–245. [Google Scholar]
  33. Doyle, J.J.; Doyle, J.L. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 1990, 12, 13–15. [Google Scholar]
  34. O’Grady, P.M. Reevaluation of phylogeny in the Drosophila obscura species group based on combined analysis of nucleotide sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 1999, 12, 124–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Liu, H.; Beckenbach, A.T. Evolution of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase II gene among 10 orders of insects. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 1992, 1, 41–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sievers, F.; Wilm, A.; Dineen, D.G.; Gibson, T.J.; Karplus, K.; Li, W.; Lopez, R.; McWilliam, H.; Remmert, M.; Söding, J.; et al. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2011, 7, 539. Available online: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo/ (accessed on 24 August 2019). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Tamura, K.; Stecher, G.; Peterson, D.; Filipski, A.; Kumar, S. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 2725–2729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Kimura, M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 1980, 16, 111–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hebert, P.D.N.; Cywinska, A.; Ball, S.L.; DeWaard, J.R. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc. R. Soc. B 2003, 270, 313–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Whitworth, T.L.; Dawson, R.D.; Magalon, H.; Baudry, E. DNA barcoding cannot reliably identify species of the blowfly genus Protocalliphora (Diptera: Calliphoridae). Proc. R. Soc. B 2007, 274, 1731–1739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Coleoptera species collected and identified during the present study 1. Thanatophilus minutes (Kraatz) 2. Necrophila (Calosilpha) cyvaniventris (Motschulsky) 3. Necrophila (Calosilpha) ioptera (Kollar and Redtenbacher) 4. Necrophila (Deutosilpha) rufithorax (Wiedemann) 5. Saprinus interruptus (Paykull) 6. Aleochara nigra Kraatz 7. Creophilus maxillosus (Linnaeus) 8. Creophilus flavipennis (Hope) 9. Dermestes maculatus Brahm 10. Onthophagus cervus (Fabricius).
Figure 1. Coleoptera species collected and identified during the present study 1. Thanatophilus minutes (Kraatz) 2. Necrophila (Calosilpha) cyvaniventris (Motschulsky) 3. Necrophila (Calosilpha) ioptera (Kollar and Redtenbacher) 4. Necrophila (Deutosilpha) rufithorax (Wiedemann) 5. Saprinus interruptus (Paykull) 6. Aleochara nigra Kraatz 7. Creophilus maxillosus (Linnaeus) 8. Creophilus flavipennis (Hope) 9. Dermestes maculatus Brahm 10. Onthophagus cervus (Fabricius).
Diversity 14 00369 g001
Figure 2. Map showing collection localities of beetle species.
Figure 2. Map showing collection localities of beetle species.
Diversity 14 00369 g002
Figure 3. Neighbor joining (NJ) for beetle species of forensic interest in India inferred from COII gene sequence.
Figure 3. Neighbor joining (NJ) for beetle species of forensic interest in India inferred from COII gene sequence.
Diversity 14 00369 g003
Figure 4. Maximum likelihood (ML) for beetle species of forensic interest in India inferred from COII gene sequence.
Figure 4. Maximum likelihood (ML) for beetle species of forensic interest in India inferred from COII gene sequence.
Diversity 14 00369 g004
Table 1. Details of species included in this study, their locality and accession number.
Table 1. Details of species included in this study, their locality and accession number.
SpeciesLocalityCollected byAccession No.Date of Collection
Silphidae
Thanatophilus minutus *
Necrophila (Calosilpha)
Ioptera *
Necrophila (Calosilpha) cyvaniventris *
Necrophila (Deutosilpha)
Rufithorax *
Kullu, Himachal Pradesh
Kullu, Himachal Pradesh
Kullu, Himachal Pradesh
Gagret, Himachal Pradesh
N.Singh
N.Singh
N.Singh
N.Singh

MH023411
MH785185
MG958644
MG940969
MG772614
MH796140

5/26/2014
5/26/2014
5/27/2014
5/27/2014
6/10/2014
6/10/2014
Histeridae
Saprinus interruptus *

Gagret, Himachal Pradesh

N.Singh

MH023410
MH785186

6/10/2014
6/10/2014
Staphylinidae
Aleochara nigra
Creophilus maxillosus
Creophilus flavipennis *

Manali, Himachal Pradesh
Kullu, Himachal Pradesh
Hamirpur, Himachal Pradesh

N.Singh
N.Singh
N.Singh

MG958643
MH777400
MG958645
MH778535
MG940970

6/30/2015
6/30/2015
5/26/2014
5/26/2014
7/6/2015
Dermestidae
Dermestes maculatus

Patiala, Punjab

N.Singh

MG891837
MH764581
MH814725

4/10/2014
4/10/2014
4/10/2014
Scarabaeidae
Onthophagus cervus *

Kullu, Himachal Pradesh

N.Singh

MH777399
MH814724
MG920500

5/26/2014
5/26/2014
6/10/2015
* Reference data for these sequences were not available at the time of submission in GenBank.
Table 2. Primer sequences used to amplify COII gene.
Table 2. Primer sequences used to amplify COII gene.
Primer NameSequence (5′—3′)LengthReference
Forward TL2J 3037ATGGCAGATTAGTGCAATGG20O’Grady (1999) [34]
Reverse TKN 3785GTTTAAGAGACCAGTACTTG20Liu and Beckenbach (1992) [35]
Table 3. Intraspecific divergences between beetle specimens using the COII gene.
Table 3. Intraspecific divergences between beetle specimens using the COII gene.
Species (Accession No.)Species (Accession No.)Intraspecific Divergence
Creophilus maxillosus MG958645Creophilus maxillosus # GQ11844310.6%
Dermestes maculatus MG891837Dermestes maculatus # NC_03720011.5%
Aleochara nigra MG958643Aleochara nigra # AJ29305112.8
# Sequences retrieved from GenBank.
Table 4. Interspecific divergences between beetle species using COII gene.
Table 4. Interspecific divergences between beetle species using COII gene.
Species (Accession No.)Species (Accession No.)Intraspecific Divergence
Onthophagus cervus MH777399Onthophagus cf. taurinus # KU73946214.7%
Onthophagus cervus MH777399Onthophagus obscurior # KU73947719.6%
Creophilus flavipennis MG940970Creophilus maxillosus # GQ11844318.9%
Creophilus flavipennis MG940970Creophilus maxillosus MG9586459.7%
Necrophila (Deutosilpha) rufithorax MG772614Necrophila (Calosilpha) ioptera MG9586447.3%
Necrophila (Deutosilpha) rufithorax MG772614Necrophila (Calosilpha) cyvaniventris MG9409698.3%
Necrophila (Calosilpha) ioptera MG958644Necrophila (Calosilpha) cyvaniventris MG9409696.5%
# Sequences retrieved from GenBank.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Singh, N.; Singh, D.; Kesavan, A.K.; Alabdallah, N.M.; Alshehri, M.A.; Sayed, S.; Ansari, M.J.; Bala, M. Cytochrome Oxidase Subunit II: Potential Marker for the Identification of Forensically Significant Species of Coleoptera—A Preliminary Study. Diversity 2022, 14, 369. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14050369

AMA Style

Singh N, Singh D, Kesavan AK, Alabdallah NM, Alshehri MA, Sayed S, Ansari MJ, Bala M. Cytochrome Oxidase Subunit II: Potential Marker for the Identification of Forensically Significant Species of Coleoptera—A Preliminary Study. Diversity. 2022; 14(5):369. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14050369

Chicago/Turabian Style

Singh, Neha, Drishtant Singh, Anup Kumar Kesavan, Nadiyah M. Alabdallah, Mohammed A. Alshehri, Samy Sayed, Mohammad Javed Ansari, and Madhu Bala. 2022. "Cytochrome Oxidase Subunit II: Potential Marker for the Identification of Forensically Significant Species of Coleoptera—A Preliminary Study" Diversity 14, no. 5: 369. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14050369

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop