Journal Pre-proof
Cytotaxonomy of endangered species Orobanche filicicola in Korea, and its closely
related species, O. coerulescens (Orobanchaceae) (I)
Bokyung Choi, Tae-Soo Jang, Jeong-Mi Park, Ji Hoon Kim, Sunhee Sim, Chang Woo
Hyun, Soonok Kim, Minsu Park, Nuree Na, Do Keun Lee
PII:
S2287-884X(20)30048-0
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japb.2020.04.001
Reference:
JAPB 506
To appear in:
Journal of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity
Received Date: 25 February 2020
Revised Date:
22 March 2020
Accepted Date: 6 April 2020
Please cite this article as: Choi B, Jang T-S, Park J-M, Kim JH, Sim S, Hyun CW, Kim S, Park M,
Na N, Lee DK, Cytotaxonomy of endangered species Orobanche filicicola in Korea, and its closely
related species, O. coerulescens (Orobanchaceae) (I), Journal of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity, https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.japb.2020.04.001.
This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition
of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of
record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published
in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that,
during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal
disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
© 2020 National Science Museum of Korea (NSMK) and Korea National Arboretum (KNA), Publishing
Services by Elsevier.
1
Title page
2
3
Cytotaxonomy of endangered species Orobanche filicicola in Korea, and its closely
4
related species, O. coerulescens (Orobanchaceae) (I)
5
6
Authors: Bokyung Choia,† · Tae-Soo Janga,† · Jeong-Mi Parkb* · Ji Hoon Kimc · Sunhee
7
Simb · Chang Woo Hyunb · Soonok Kimb · Minsu Parkd · Nuree Nad · Do Keun Leee
8
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
9
10
a
11
National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea
12
b
13
Incheon 22689, Korea
14
c
15
d
16
e
Department of Biological Science, College of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Chungnam
Department of Biological Resources Research of National Institute of Biological Resources,
IRUDAIN Inc. Jeju 63145, Korea
Department of Biology Education, Kongju National University, Gongju 32588, Korea
Wild plant research society on Mt. Baekdu, Seoul 07247, Korea
17
18
E-mail address: jmpark99@korea.kr (J-M. Park).
19
20
21
22
Running title: Cytotaxonomy of some Orobanche species native to Korea (I)
23
Abstract
24
25
The Orobanche is the largest group, which are mainly distributed in the northern hemisphere and
26
consisted of about 170 species. The present study is focused on a cytological study on Korean
27
endangered species Orobanche filicicola as well as morphologically similar species O. coerulescens
28
and their morphotype, which was previously referred to O. coerulescens f. alba but it was
29
taxonomically treated as a synonym of O. coerulescens. Chromosome numbers of 13 individuals in
30
six populations of two Korean Orobanche taxa (O. coerulescens and O. filicicola) as well as
31
morphotype of O. coerulescens were examined to understand the karyotype diversity. A chromosome
32
number of 2n = 2x = 38 was uniformly observed for all the Orobanche taxa in Korea despite that
33
individuals of two different color types (typical purple and whitish yellow) were included. The
34
karyotypes of O. filicicola were from metacentric to submetacentric and the length of chromosomes
35
ranged from 2.08 to 4.74 µm, resulting in a Haploid Karyotype Length (HKL) of 60.92 µm.
36
Investigations of meiotic configuration of O. filicicola, O. coerulescens, and its morphotype were
37
constantly stable. In those species all homologous chromosome pairs have formed regular bivalents as
38
previously documented in other species of the genus Orobanche.
39
40
41
Keywords: Chromosome number; Endangered species; Meiosis; Orobanche; Taxonomy
42
Introduction
43
44
Orobanche L., is the largest genus among the holoparasitic genera in the family
45
Orobanchaceae Vent. and comprised of ca. 170 species that are distributed predominantly in the
46
Northern Hemisphere (Zhang and Tzvelev 1998; Schneeweiss et al 2004a, b). The genus includes
47
annual, biennial and perennial herbs and are characterized by a fleshy body with spike or raceme
48
inflorescences and possesses haustoria which the plant can obtain water and nutrients from their host
49
plants (Zhang and Tzvelev 1998). The genus Orobanche is divided into four sections as the following,
50
which is well supported by the base chromosome numbers: sect. Orobanche L. (x = 19); sects.
51
Trionychon Wallr. and Myzorrhiza (Phil.) Beck (x = 12); sect. Gymnocaulis Nutt. (x = 24;
52
Schneeweiss et al 2004a). While sects. Orobanche and Trionychon are found both in the Old World
53
and the New World, sects. Gymnocaulis and Myzorrhiza are restricted to the New World (Schneeweiss
54
et al 2004b). In Korea, along with one recently recognized species, Orobanche filicicola Nakai ex
55
Hyun, H.C. Lim & Shin, two other species (O. coerulescens Stephan and O. pycnostachya Hance) are
56
currently recognized (Hyun et al 2003; Hong 2007). Due to habitat destruction, degradation, and
57
fragmentation, Orobanche species in Korea are threatened, and O. filicicola is endangered among the
58
species in Korea (Hyun et al 2003; Kim 2006). Orobanche pycnostachya is distributed in North Korea
59
(Hong 2007). Thus, the taxon was not included for this study.
60
The unique parasitic lifestyle of Orobanche with its host plants makes the genus a valuable
61
group to study various aspects of its biology including taxonomy and co-evolution with host plants
62
(Piwowarczyk et al 2018, 2019). Despite the evolutionary and ecological importance of the Korean
63
Orobanche species, no comprehensive taxonomic and chromosomal analyses have been performed to
64
date. Although Orobanche filicicola has been nomenclaturally validated and clearly distinguished
65
from other Korean Orobanche species based on corolla color, style pubescence, and overall plant size
66
(Hyun et al 2003; Kim 2006), but the infraspecific taxonomy of O. coerulescens is complicated
67
because the plants have different color types (typical purple: O. coerulescens Stephan f. coerulescens,
68
whitish yellow: O. coerulescens Stephan f. alba Y. Lee; Lee and Kim 2005) and the species can be
69
divided in two types based on presence/absence of trichomes (G-type vs. P-type; Lee et al 2006).
70
Chromosome studies employing both classical and molecular cytogenetic methods using
71
FISH (fluorescence in situ hybridization) have proved to be an important source for taxonomic and
72
systematical analyses in angiosperms (Weiss-Schneeweiss and Schneeweiss 2013; Jang et al 2018a, b;
73
Choi et al 2019). However, chromosomal studies of the Orobanche are still limited. For example,
74
Chromosomal counts of only 98 species out of approximately 170 species are available in the genus
75
(Chromosome Counts Database, CCDB, ver. 1.45, < http://ccdb.tau.ac.il/search/>, Rice et al 2015).
76
Chromosomal studies of Orobanche have rarely been carried out and chromosome number
77
information for the Korean Orobanche species is not available to date (Schneeweiss et al 2004a; Li et
78
al 2017). Thus, the aims of the current study are 1) to report base chromosome number of Orobanche
79
filicicola and O. coerulescens including its infraspecific morphotype (syn. O. coerulescens for. alba),
80
and 2) to provide karyotype information and characterize the meiotic behavior of Orobanche filicicola.
81
82
Material and methods
83
Materials
84
A total of seven individuals of Orobanche filicicola from two populations in Island Je-ju in
85
Korea were investigated cytologically (Table 1 and Appendix A). In order to compare chromosome
86
number as well as meiotic behavior, five individuals from four populations of O. coerulescens
87
including one individual of the its morphotype (syn. O. coerulescens for. alba) were also examined
88
(Table 1). Orobanche pycnostachya was not included in this study because there was no access to any
89
samples due to its distribution (North Korea; Hong 2007). Due to the lack of typical root meristems,
90
chromosome numbers were determined from meiotic divisions in pollen mother cells (PMCs). Young
91
flower buds were fixed in the field in 3 : 1 = ethanol : glacial acetic acid for at least 24 hours at room
92
temperature and stored at –20˚C until use for meiotic analyses (Li et al 2017). Voucher specimens of
93
the examined individuals used in this study are deposited at the herbarium of the Chungnam National
94
University, Daejeon, Korea (CNUK). All investigated specimens are indicated in Appendix A.
95
96
Chromosome counts and karyotype analysis
97
Feulgen staining with Schiff’s reagent was done following the standard method (Jang et al
98
2013). Briefly, material was hydrolyzed in 5N HCl for 30 minutes at room temperature, washed
99
briefly with tap water, and stained with Schiff’s reagent in darkness for an hour. Squash preparations
100
were made in a drop of 60% acetic acid. Preparations with a minimum of ten good quality
101
chromosome spreads were analyzed for each individual with a light microscope (Olympus BX-53)
102
and photographed with digital camera (Olympus DP-74).
103
For measurements of chromosome length of O. filicicola, microspores in metaphase were
104
chosen. Chromosomes were cut out and arranged in Corel Photo-Paint 12.0. The size of chromosomes
105
was measured using Micromeasure ver. 3.3 (<https://sites.biology.colostate.edu/Micromeasure/>)
106
following Jang et al (2013). Chromosome arm and haploid karyotype length were measured on
107
chromosomal spreads with a medium degree of chromosome condensation per each individual.
108
109
Results and discussion
110
111
The karyotypes and chromosome numbers of the Korean endemic plants Orobanche
112
filicicola were reported here for the first time. The chromosome number of all individuals of the two
113
species were diploids, 2n = 38 (n = 19), despite that two different color types (i.e., typical purple vs.
114
whitish yellow) of O. coerulescens were included (Figure 1 and Table 1). The chromosome number of
115
O. coerulescens in Korea was in agreement with previous reports of O. coerulescens occurring in
116
central Europe (Weber 1976) although n = 20 was also found in Rice et al (2015). However, it is
117
possible that the deviant number of O. coerulescens, is likely due to species misidentification because
118
no vouchers were cited in the previous publication (Fedorov 1969). In addition, flower colors might
119
be usually affected by different environmental conditions (Eaton et al 2012; Arista et al 2013; Sobral
120
et al 2015; Sobel et al 2019), therefore, no differences in the chromosome number between two color
121
phenotypes (i.e., typical purple vs. whitish yellow) of O. coerulescens are not surprising (Figure 1)
122
although latter morphotype (i.e., whitish yellow of flower) was previously treated as a separate taxon
123
named as O. coerulescens f. alba (Lee and Kim 2005).
124
Hyun et al (2003) validated O. filicicola as a separate species based on glandular stems and
125
flowers, densely villous anthers along the sutures, blue violet corolla with white lower part, and
126
deeply two-parted calyx in comparison with other Korean Orobanche taxa (Figure 1A). Particularly,
127
Orobanchaceae is cytologically diverse with chromosome numbers of n = 12, 19, 24, which have been
128
mostly derived from descending dysploidy and polyploidy (Schneeweiss et al 2014b). Sectional
129
circumscriptions of Orobanche were characterized by different chromosome numbers (Schneeweiss et
130
al 2004a), and based solely on the chromosome number, therefore, it is possible that O. filicicola and
131
O. coerulescens may be included in the sect. Orobanche (Figures 2 and 4). Nevertheless, it is not
132
sufficient to make any taxonomic decisions for O. coerulescens and O. filicicola (Figures 1–4).
133
Further comprehensive studies on morphological variations as well as molecular analyses based on
134
DNA sequences of more samples from different populations are required to elucidate the taxonomic
135
position/relationships of the Orobanche species (Hyun et al 2003; Schneeweiss et al 2004b; Lee et al
136
2016; Li et al 2017).
137
All chromosomes were metacentric to submetacentric (Figure 2B) and the size in length
138
ranged from 2.08 to 4.74 µm, resulting in a Haploid Karyotype Length (HKL) of 60.92 µm (Figure
139
2A–B). It was shown that normal bivalent formation was observed in relatively high frequencies from
140
meiotic behavior of the investigated Orobanche filicicola (Figure 3C–D). No meiotic irregularities
141
such as laggards or bridges have been observed in the investigated samples (Figure 3A–H) as reported
142
in the previous study of Orobanche (Schneeweiss et al 2014a). During meiosis, all chromosome pairs
143
formed regular bivalents, each usually possessing two chiasmata (Figure 3D–E). In diakinesis, usually
144
a set of bivalents are associated with the nucleolus, suggesting the presence of at least one pairs of
145
active 35S rDNA loci (Figure 3B), and this was also confirmed in the mitosis and the karyotype of
146
Orobanche filicicola (Figure 2A–B). In O. coerulescens and its morphotype (syn. O. coerulescens for.
147
alba), all homologous chromosome pairs have formed regular bivalents as seen in O. filicicola (Figure
148
4A–B).
149
Several previous taxonomic studies have shown that many Korean Orobanche species are
150
characterized by slight morphological differences in plant size (i.e., plant height, and bract, calyx, and
151
corolla size), bract shape, and corolla color (Hyun et al 2003; Hong 2007; Lee et al 2006). However,
152
due to the loss of color during desiccation of herbarium specimens as well as the samples preserved in
153
formalin-acetic acid-alcohol (FAA) in field, Orobanche is one of the most difficult genera to study
154
taxonomic classification (Schneeweiss et al 2009). Additionally, Orobanche filicicola and O.
155
coerulescens have never been studied together to date (e.g. Hyun et al 2003; Hong 2007; Lee et al
156
2016). Therefore, more expanded samplings of the Orobanche populations are still required to clarify
157
whether the incidence of polyploidization exists in O. filicicola and O. coerulescens. Additionally,
158
further analyses including molecular barcoding, molecular cytogenetic approach involving FISH
159
(fluorescence in situ hybridization) using 3S and 35S rDNA probes as well as morphometrics are
160
required to re-evaluate the clear taxonomic position of the Korean Orobanche taxa.
161
162
Conclusion
163
The chromosome number of the Orobanche filicicola was reported in the present study for
164
the first time with 2n = 2x = 38, and the same chromosome number was confirmed for Korean
165
populations of O. coerulescens and its morphotype (syn. O. coerulescens for. alba). Investigations of
166
meiotic configuration of the of the Korean Orobanche taxa were constantly stable. The chromosomal
167
information of the Korean Orobanche species contributes towards a better understanding of taxonomy
168
and chromosomal evolution of the genus Orobanche. Further insight into the phylogeny,
169
morphological variation, cytological stabilization and molecular cytology of the Korean Orobanche
170
species and their closely related taxa are required to better understand the evolution of the genus
171
Orbanche.
172
173
174
175
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
176
177
Acknowledgments
178
The authors thank to Tae Hwan Kim for providing the detailed photographs of the
179
investigated taxa in fields and members at the Herbarium of Chungnam National University (CNUK)
180
for their help in various ways. This study was supported by grants on project as “The Genetic
181
Evaluation of Parasitic plant (I)” from the National Institute of Biological Resources of Ministry of
182
Environment (NIBR201905101) and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the
183
Korea government (NRF-2018R1C1B6003170).
184
185
References
186
Arista M, Talavera M, Berjano R, et al. 2013. Abiotic factors may explain the geographical
187
distribution of flower colour morphs and the maintenance of colour polymorphism in the scarlet
188
pimpernel. Journal of Ecology 101 (6):1613–1622.
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
Choi B, Yang S, Song J-H, et al. 2019. Karyotype and genome size variation in Ajuga L. (AjugoideaeLamiaceae). Nordic Journal of Botany 37:e02337.
Eaton DA, Fenster CB, Hereford J, et al. 2012. Floral diversity and community structure in
Pedicularis (Orobanchaceae). Ecology 93 (sp8):S182–S194.
Fedorov ANA. 1969. Chromosome Number of Flowering Plants. Komarov Botanical Institute:
Academy of Science of the USSR.
Hong S-P. 2007. Orobanchaceae Vent. In: Park CW. editor. The Genera of Vascular Plants of Korea.
Seoul: Academy Publ. Co. pp. 815–819.
Hyun JO, Lim Y, Shin H. 2003. Validation of Orobanche filicicola (Orobanchaceae) from Korea.
Novon 13 (1):64–67.
199
Jang T-S, Emadzade K, Parker JS, et al. 2013. Chromosomal diversification and karyotype evolution
200
of diploids in the cytologically diverse genus Prospero (Hyacinthaceae). BMC Evolutionary
201
Biology 13:136.
202
Jang T-S, Parker JS, Emadzade K, et al. 2018a. Multiple origins and nested cycles of hybridization
203
result in high tetraploid diversity in the monocot Prospero. Frontiers in Plant Sciences 9:433.
204
Jang T-S, Parker JS, Weiss-Schneeweiss H. 2018b. Euchromatic supernumerary chromosomal
205
segments – remnants of ongoing karyotype restructuring in the Prospero autumnale complex?
206
Genes 9 (10):468.
207
208
209
Kim Y-S. 2006. Conservation of plant diversity in Korea. Landscape and Ecological Engineering
2:163–170.
Lee W, Jeong KS, Choi K, et al. 2016. Morphological variation and aspects of the geographic
210
distribution of Orobanche coerulescens Stephan ex Willd. (Orobanchaceae) on Ulleung-do and
211
Dok-do Islands. Korean Journal of Plant Taxonomy 46 (4):405–412.
212
213
Lee YN, Kim JH. 2005. A new form of Orobanche coerulescens Stephan. Bulletin of Korea Plant
Research 5:27.
214
Li X, Jang T-S, Temsch EM, et al. 2017. Molecular and karyological data confirm that the enigmatic
215
genus Platypholis from Bonin-Islands (SE Japan) is phylogenetically nested within Orobanche
216
(Orobanchaceae). Journal of Plant Research 130:273–280.
217
Piwowarczyk R, Denysenko-Bennett M, Goralski G, et al. 2018. Phylogenetic relationships within
218
Orobanche and Phelipanche (Orobanchaceae) from Central Europe, focused on problematic
219
aggregates, taxonomy, and host ranges. Acta Biologica Cracoveinsia series Botanica 60 (1):45–64.
220
Piwowarczyk R, Pedraja ÓS, Moral GM, et al. 2019. Holoparasitic Orobanchaceae (Cistanche,
221
Diphelypaea, Orobanche, Phelipanche) in Armenia: distribution, habitats, host range and
222
taxonomic problems. Phytotaxa 386 (1):1–106.
223
224
Rice A, Glick L, Abadi S, et al. 2015. The chromosome counts database (CCDB) – a community
resource of plant chromosome numbers. New Phytologist 206 (1):19–26.
225
Schneeweiss GM, Palomeque T, Colwell AE, et al. 2004a. Chromosome numbers and karyotype
226
evolution in holoparasitic Orobanche (Orobanchaceae) and related genera. American Journal of
227
Botany 91 (3):439–448.
228
Schneeweiss GM, Colwell A, Park J-M, et al. 2004b. Phylogeny of holoparasitic Orobanche
229
(Orobanchaceae) inferred from nuclear ITS sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 30
230
(2):465–478.
231
232
Schneeweiss GM, Frajman B, Dakskobler I. 2009. Orobanche lycoctoni Rhiner (Orobanchaceae), a
poorly known species of the central European flora. Candollea 64:91–99.
233
Sobel JM, Stankowski S, Streisfeld MA. 2019. Variation in ecophysiological traits might contribute to
234
ecogeographic isolation and divergence between parapatric ecotypes of Mimulus aurantiacus.
235
Journal of Evolutionary Biology 32 (6):604–618.
236
237
Sobral M, Veiga T, Domínguez P, et al. 2015. Selective pressures explain differences in flower color
among Gentiana lutea populations. PLoS ONE 10:e0132522.
238
Weiss-Schneeweiss H, Schneeweiss GM. 2013. Karyotype diversity and evolutionary trends in
239
angiosperms. In: Leitch IJ. Greilhuber J, Doležel et al., editors. Plant Genome Diversity 2:
240
Physical Structure, Behaviour and Evolution of Plant Genomes. Vienna: Springer. pp. 209–230.
241
Weber A. 1976. Die chromosomenzahlen der in Mitteleuropa vorkommenden Arten von Orobanche
242
243
244
245
sect. Orobanche. Plant Systematics and Evolution 124:303–308.
Zhang Z, Tzvelev NN. 1998. Orobanchaceae. In: Wu Z-Y, Raven PH. editors. Flora of China, Vol. 18.
Beijing: Beijing; St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden Press. pp. 229–243.
246
Table 1. Information on the plant material used for the chromosome number in Orobanche filicicola,
247
O. coerulescens and its morphotype (syn. O. coerulescens for. alba).
Collector
Taxon & locality*
Chromosome
number
collection number
Orobanche filicicola Nakai ex Hyun, H.C. Lim & Shin
J-043
TS, JM, JH, DK, TH, SH,YC
2n = 2x = 38
J-044
TS, JM, JH, DK, TH, SH,YC
2n = 2x = 38
J-045
TS, JM, JH, DK, TH, SH, YC
2n = 2x = 38
J-046
TS, JM, JH, DK, TH, SH, YC
2n = 2x = 38
J-052
TS, JM, JH, DK, TH, SH, YC
2n = 2x = 38
J-024
TS, YC
2n = 2x = 38
J-034
TS, JM, JH, DK, TH, SH, YC
2n = 2x = 38
O. coerulescens Stephan
J-022
TS, JM, JH, DK, TH, SH, YC
2n = 2x = 38
J-S24
TS, JM, JH, DK, TH, SH, YC
2n = 2x = 38
J-0016
TS, YC
2n = 2x = 38
090517
JM, MS
2n = 2x = 38
SK19-p013-1
MS, NR
2n = 2x = 38
Morphotype of O. coerulescens Stephan (syn. O. coerulescens Stephan f. alba Y.N. Lee)
J-013
TS, JM, JH, DK, TH, SH, YC
2n = 2x = 38
248
Collectors: TS = Tae-Soo Jang; JM = Jeong-Mi Park; MS = Minsu Park; NR = Nuree Na; JH = Ji
249
Hoon Kim; DK = Do Keun Lee; TH = Tae Hwan Kim; SH = Sunhee Sim; YC =Young-Min Choi.
250
*The information of localities was not indicated in this Table for protection purpose of the endangered
251
taxa (see Appendix A).
252
253
Legend of Figures
254
255
Figure 1. Habit and floral morphology of the Korean Orobanche species.: A, Orobanche filicicola; B-
256
C, floral color variation in O. coerulescence; B, typical color type; C, whitish yellow morphotype of
257
O. coerulescence (syn. O. coerulescens for. alba).
258
259
Figure 2. Chromosomes (A) and karyotype (B) of Orobanche filicicola: 2n = 2x = 38 (metaphase of
260
mitotic cell division). <scale bar: 5 µm>
261
262
Figure 3. Meiotic behavior in Orobanche filicicola.: A, Pachytene; B, Diakinesis; C, Metaphase I; D,
263
Anaphase I; E, Later anaphase I; F, Telophase I; G, Tetrad; H, Young pollen grains. <scale bar: 5 µm>
264
265
Figure 4. PMC (pollen mother cell) of two different flower color types (typical purple: A, whitish
266
yellow: B) in Orobanche coerulescence at diakinesis showing n = 19 chromosome number with
267
regular bivalents paring during meiosis.: A, Orobanche coerulescence; B, morphotype of O.
268
coerulescence (syn. O. coerulescens for. alba). <scale bar: 5 µm>
269
270
Appendix A. Voucher specimens examined in the present study. The detailed information of the
271
collection sites was not indicated for protection purpose of the all investigated populations.
272
Orobanche filicicola Nakai ex Hyun, H.C. Lim & Shin: Korea, Jeju-do, 26 Apr 2019, JM Park et al.,
273
J-043 (CNUK00001197); Korea, Jeju-do, 26 Apr 2019, JM Park et al., J-044 (CNUK00001198);
274
Korea, Jeju-do, 26 Apr 2019, JM Park et al., J-045 (CNUK00001199); Korea, Jeju-do, 26 Apr 2019,
275
JM Park et al., J-046 (CNUK00001200); Korea, Jeju-do, 26 Apr 2019, JM Park et al., J-052
276
(CNUK00002098); Korea, Jeju-do, 26 Apr 2019, TS Jang & YM Choi, J-024 (CNUK00001178);
277
Korea, Jeju-do, 26 Apr 2019, JM Park et al., J-034 (CNUK00001188).
278
O. coerulescens Stephan: Korea, Jeju-do, 26 Apr 2019, JM Park et al., J-022 (CNUK00001176);
279
Korea, Jeju-do, 26 Apr 2019, JM Park et al., J-S24 (CNUK00002097); Korea, Jeju-do, 26 Apr 2019,
280
TS Jang & YM Choi, J-0016 (CNUK00001170); Korea, Jeolla-do, 26 Apr 2019, JM Park & MS Park,
281
090517 (CNUK00002096); Korea, Gyeongsang-do, 26 Apr 2019, MS Park & NR Na, SK19-p013-1
282
(CNUK00002095).
283
Morphotype of O. coerulescens Stephan (syn. O. coerulescens for. alba): Korea, Jeju-do, 26 Apr
284
2019, TS Jang & YM Choi, J-013 (CNUK00001167).
Declaration of interests
☒ The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships
that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
☐The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered
as potential competing interests: