Little cherry virus
Identity
- Preferred Scientific Name
- Little cherry virus
- Other Scientific Names
- cherry little cherry virus (Németh, 1986)
- K & S disease (Reeves, Cheney & Milbrath, 1955)
- K & S little cherry (Reeves, Cheney & Milbrath, 1955)
- little cherry disease virus (Wilks & Welsh, 1961)
- sour cherry decline (Milbrath & Williams, 1956)
- International Common Names
- Spanishcereza pequeña
- Frenchpetite cerise
- Local Common Names
- AustriaKleinfrüchtigkeit der Kirsche
- GermanyKleinfrüchtigkeit der Kirsche
- SwitzerlandKleinfrüchtigkeit der Kirsche
- English acronym
- LChV
Pictures
Distribution
Host Plants and Other Plants Affected
Host | Host status | References |
---|---|---|
Prunus avium (sweet cherry) | Main | |
Prunus cerasus (sour cherry) | Main | |
Prunus domestica (plum) | Other | |
Prunus dulcis (almond) | Other | |
Prunus emarginata (Bitter cherry tree) | Wild host | |
Prunus mahaleb (mahaleb cherry) | Other | |
Prunus pennsylvanica | Wild host | |
Prunus persica (peach) | Other | |
Prunus serrulata (Japanese flowering cherry) | Other | |
Prunus subhirtella (weeping Japanese cherry) | Other | |
Prunus tomentosa (Nanking cherry tree) | Other | |
Prunus yedoensis | Other |
Symptoms
Prunus avium and P. cerasus are the species most sensitive to the effects of little cherry virus. However, the degree of varietal symptom severity varies greatly and is influenced by choice of rootstock. P. avium Lambert develops the most severe fruit symptoms including small, triangular fruit with high shoulders, leather textured patches on the flat faces of the fruit, poor colour development and little or no flavour. Fruit of cv. Hedelfingen is similarly affected. Varieties such as Bing and Early Rivers exhibit shock symptoms with small, poorly coloured fruit for the first 1 or 2 years after infection, but fruit appearance in subsequent years returns close to normal size. The lack of flavour persists. Varieties such as Amber, Merton Bigarreau, Bradbourne Black, Dawson, Florence, Roundel and Napolean exhibit mild fruit symptoms. Partial or complete tolerance of some European (Posnette, 1965) and New Zealand (Wood and McLaren, 1990) varieties has probably led to the virus not being of primary concern in these areas.The impact of little cherry virus on fruit size was greater when cultivars were grown on Mazzard rootstock than on Mahaleb rootstock, regardless of whether P. avium or P. cerasus scions were compared. The differential response to little cherry virus of scions on different rootstocks was also observed when several cultivars of sweet cherry were compared (Milbrath and Reynolds, 1964)In addition to fruit symptoms, sensitive varieties such as Lambert exhibit a slight upward curl of leaves and carry the leaves at an elevated angle during fruit maturation. This has the effect of exposing more fruit to view, and enhances the apparent effect of infection of fruit symptoms.In some varieties, premature leaf reddening is observed 6 to 8 weeks before normal leaf senescence. Cultivars Sam, Mazzard F12/1 and Deacon all exhibit leaf reddening. Canindex 1, a non-commercial sweet cherry, shows extreme leaf reddening and is used as a indicator host for little cherry virus testing (Hansen and Green, 1985).Little cherry virus reduces growth of cv. Lambert trees (Wilks and Milbrath, 1956). This effect is more severe on cultivars such as Canindex 1 and Sam that exhibit the leaf reddening symptom. Infected trees of sensitive varieties produce little or no annual growth.
List of Symptoms/Signs
Symptom or sign | Life stages | Sign or diagnosis |
---|---|---|
Plants/Fruit/abnormal shape | ||
Plants/Fruit/malformed skin | ||
Plants/Fruit/reduced size | ||
Plants/Leaves/abnormal colours | ||
Plants/Leaves/abnormal forms | ||
Plants/Whole plant/dwarfing |
Prevention and Control
Phytosanitary Measures
The most effective means of controlling little cherry virus(es) is the strict use of virus-tested and certified scion and rootstock material. The exclusion of the pathogen(s) from a production zone is the most desirable approach to disease management and can be applied at the national or local level.In the case of British Columbia, Canada, a little cherry control programme was established in 1970 and expanded in 1982 (Little cherry control regulation of the BC Plant Protection Act). Annual surveys, confirmatory testing and mandatory tree removal of infected trees have reduced disease pressure significantly in the control area. Moreover, planting in the control area of ornamental cherry trees and potential symptomless carriers of the virus(es) such as cherry seedlings is regulated. In Europe, little cherry disease is regulated in most national certification systems.
Vector Control
Control of the only known vector, the apple mealybug, is an effective means of limiting the spread of little cherry virus-2 in British Colombia. Dormant oil sprays and application of insecticides at the time when mealybug nymphs are mobile are effective. Careful spraying of infected trees before removal minimises displacement of mealybugs from the infected tree to adjacent hosts.Biological control of the apple mealybug has been a significant factor in disease management. Care should be taken to reduce the impact of agricultural practices on these biological control agents.
Cultural Control
Wild bitter cherry (Prunus emarginata) is removed from areas surrounding commercial planting areas in British Colombia. Under current conditions where control of the mealybug vector is effective, the disease spreads relatively slowly. Removal of infected trees as soon as detected is essential for reducing the economic impact of the disease. Mealybug nymphs are most mobile in the spring, typically just before harvest. Tree removal of known sources should be completed before this seasonal cycle to prevent the opportunity for disease transmission.Precautions should be taken to limit the movement of leaves bearing viruliferous mealybugs from one orchard to another. This is most likely to occur during harvest.
Impact
The impact of little cherry virus(es) varies greatly from one region of the world to another. The sweet cherry industry in western Canada was very severely affected because the industry was reliant on sensitive cultivars of sweet cherry (primarily Lambert) and because the apple mealybug had just been introduced and its populations increased dramatically (Eastwell, 1997). With the introduction of biological control and chemical spray programmes for the apple mealybug, and an aggressive control programme, the sweet cherry industry has been re-established in western Canada. A large number of virus infected trees have been rogued in Northern Germany. They have often been replanted with certified virus-free plant material. The situation remains somewhat difficult until air-borne vector(s) have been identified.In Europe and New Zealand, a selection of tolerant or resistant cultivars of sweet cherry has resulted in limited impact by little cherry disease. The cultivars still experience a reduction in fruit quantity and quality.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © CABI. CABI is a registered EU trademark. This article is published under a Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
History
Published online: 10 December 2019
Language
English
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
SCITE_
Citations
Export citation
Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.
EXPORT CITATIONSExport Citation
View Options
View options
Get Access
Login Options
Check if you access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.