Skip to main content
Log in

Photosynthetic compensation by the reproductive structures in the spring ephemeral Gagea lutea

  • Published:
Plant Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Growth and reproduction of spring ephemerals inhabiting deciduous forests progress simultaneously during a short period from snowmelt to canopy closure. To clarify the mechanism to mitigate the cost of reproduction, contributions of foliar and non-foliar photosynthetic products to seed production were examined in a spring ephemeral Gagea lutea. Leaf growth, foliar and non-foliar photosynthetic activities, and total assimilated products were compared among reproductive-intact, floral bud-removal, and vegetative plants. Translocation of current photosynthetic products to individual organs was quantified by 13CO2-trace experiment. Bulb growth was compared between hand-pollination and floral bud-removal treatments. Finally, seed set was compared between intact, leaf-clipping, and bract-clipping treatments. Fruit-forming plants retained leaves longer than vegetative and floral bud-removal plants, but the assimilative contribution of extended leaf longevity was negligible. Carbon supply by bract photosynthesis was large enough for fruit development, while carbon supply by fruit photosynthesis was offset by the high respiration loss. Foliar photosynthetic products were largely transported to bulbs, while translocation to reproductive functions was negligible. Because the floral bud-removal increased the bulb growth, lack of reproduction could lead to more storage. The leaf-clipping had no effect on seed production, while the bract-clipping significantly reduced the seed production. Therefore, current photosynthesis of leafy bracts might be a major carbon source for fruit development. This self-compensative mechanism of reproductive structure enables the continuous reproductive activity in this species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antlfinger AE, Wendel LF (1997) Reproductive effort and floral photosynthesis in Spiranthes cernua (Orchidaceae). Am J Bot 84:769–780

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aschan G, Pfanz H (2003) Non-foliar photosynthesis—a strategy of additional carbon acquisition. Flora 198:81–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banuelos MJ, Obeso JR (2004) Resource allocation in the dioecious shrub Rhamnus alpinus: the hidden costs of reproduction. Evol Ecol Res 6:397–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazzaz FA, Carlson RW, Harper JL (1979) Contribution to reproductive effort by photosynthesis of flowers and fruits. Nature 279:554–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernett CC, Laemmerzhal A, Rockwood LL (2009) Reduction in reproductive output and leaf size in Sanguinaria canadensis as a cost of reproduction. J Torrey Bot Soc 136:457–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanke MM, Lenz F (1989) Fruit photosynthesis. Plant Cell Environ 12:31–46

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dudash RC, Fenster B (1997) Multi-year study of pollen limitation and cost of reproduction in the iteroparous Silene virginica. Ecology 78:484–493

    Google Scholar 

  • Geber MA, Watson MA, de Kroon H (1997) Organ preformation, development, and resource allocation in perennials. In: Grace J, Bazzaz FA (eds) Plant resource allocation. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 113–141

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gehring JL, Delph LF (2006) Effects of reduced source-sink ratio on the cost of reproduction in females of Silene latifolia. Inter J Plant Sci 167:843–851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gifford RM, Evans LT (1981) Photosynthesis, carbon partitioning, and yield. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 32:485–509

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera CM (2005) Post-floral perianth functionality: contribution of persistent sepals to seed development in Helleborus foetidus (Ranunculaceae). Am J Bot 92:1486–1491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hori Y, Tsuge H (1993) Photosynthesis of bract and its contribution to seed maturity in Carpinus laxiflora. Ecol Res 8:81–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horibata S, Hasegawa SF, Kudo G (2007) Cost of reproduction in a spring ephemeral species, Adonis ramosa (Ranunculaceae): carbon budget for seed production. Ann Bot 100:565–571

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ida TY, Kudo G (2008) Timing of canopy closure influences carbon translocation and seed production of an understory herb, Trillium apetalon (Trilliaceae). Ann Bot 101:435–446

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jonasson S, Medrano H, Flexas J (1997) Variation in leaf longevity of Pistacia lentiscus and its relationship to sex and drought stress inferred from leaf δ13C. Funct Ecol 11:282–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kudo G, Ida TY (2010) Carbon source for reproduction in a spring ephemeral herb, Corydalis ambigua (Papaveraceae). Funct Ecol 24:62–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kudo G, Ida TY, Tani T (2008) Linkages between phenology, pollination, photosynthesis, and reproduction in deciduous forest understory plants. Ecology 89:321–331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lapointe L (1998) Fruit development in Trillium. Plant Physiol 117:183–188

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lehtilä K, Syrjänen K (1995) Positive effects of pollination on subsequent size, reproduction and survival of Primula veris. Ecology 76:1061–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd DG, Webb CJ (1977) Secondary sex characters in plants. Bot Rev 43:177–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcelis LFM, Hofman-Eijer LRB (1995) The contribution of fruit photosynthesis to the carbon requirement of carbon requirement of cucumber fruits as affected by irradiance, temperature and ontogeny. Physiol Plant 93:476–483

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall B, Biscoe PV (1980) A model for C3 leaves describing the dependence of net photosynthesis on irradiance. J Exp Bot 31:29–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muller RN (1978) The phenology, growth, and ecosystem dynamics of Erythronium americanum in the northern hardwood forest. Ecol Monogr 48:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell EA (1991) Direct and delayed costs of reproduction in Aesculus californica. J Ecol 79:365–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicotra AB (1999) Reproductive allocation and the long-term costs of reproduction in Siparuna grandiflora, a dioecious neo-tropical shrub. J Ecol 87:138–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishikawa Y (1998) The function of multiple flowers of a spring ephemeral, Gagea lutea (Liliaceae), with reference to blooming order. Can J Bot 76:1404–1411

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishikawa Y (2009) Significance of intra-inflorescence variation on flowering time of a spring ephemeral, Gagea lutea (Liliaceae), under seasonal fluctuations of pollinator and light availabilities. Plant Ecol 202:337–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obeso JR (1993) Cost of reproduction in the perennial herb Asphodelus albus (Liliaceae). Ecography 16:365–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obeso JR (2002) The costs of reproduction in plants. New Phytol 155:321–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poorter H, Villar (1997) The fate of acquired carbon in plants: chemical composition and construction costs. In: Grace J, Bazzaz FA (eds) Plant resource allocation. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 39–72

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Primack R, Stacy E (1998) Cost of reproduction in the pink lady’s slipper orchid (Cypripedium acaule, Orchidaceae): an eleven-year experimental study of three populations. Am J Bot 85:1672–1679

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2011) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/

  • Ramsey M (1997) No evidence for demographic cost of seed production in the pollen-limited perennial herb Blandfordia grandiflora (Liliaceae). Inter J Plant Sci 158:785–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reznick D (1985) Costs of reproduction: an evaluation of the empirical evidence. Oikos 44:257–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein DE, Zak DR (2001) Photosynthetic adaptation and acclimation to exploit seasonal periods of direct irradiance in three temperate, deciduous-forest herbs. Funct Ecol 15:722–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Routhier M, Lapointe L (2002) Impact of tree leaf phenology on growth rates and reproduction in the spring flowering species Trillium erectum (Liliaceae). Am J Bot 89:500–505

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salopek-Sondi B, Kovac M, Ljubesic N, Magnus V (2000) Fruit initiation in Helleborus niger L. triggers chloroplast formation and photosynthesis in the perianth. J Plant Physiol 157:357–364

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tozawa M, Ueno N, Seiwa K (2009) Compensatory mechanisms for reproductive costs in the dioecious tree Salix integra. Botany 87:315–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wardlaw IF (1990) The control of carbon partitioning in plants. New Phytol 116:341–381

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Watson MA, Casper BB (1984) Morphogenetic constraints on patterns of carbon distribution in plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 15:233–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wullschleger SD, Oosterhuis DM (1990) Photosynthetic and respiratory activity of fruiting forms within the cotton canopy. Plant Physiol 94:463–469

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was partly supported by a grant-in-aid from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [23405006]. We thank R. Miyata, A. Koyama, and T. Saito for their help in the field survey; and the editor and anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ninuola Sunmonu.

Appendices

Appendix 1

See Table 6

Table 6 Photosynthetic parameters of Gagea lutea estimated for basal leaves at individual growth stages and reproductive treatments (reproductive-intact, vegetative, and floral bud-removal plants) in 2010

Appendix 2

See Table 7

Table 7 Photosynthetic parameters of Gagea lutea estimated for reproductive organs (fruit and bract) at individual growth stages in 2010 (for fruits) and 2011 (for bracts)

Appendix 3

See Table 8

Table 8 Dry weight allocation to individual organs at flowering (1st May) and fruiting (28th May) stages in Gagea lutea

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sunmonu, N., Ida, T.Y. & Kudo, G. Photosynthetic compensation by the reproductive structures in the spring ephemeral Gagea lutea . Plant Ecol 214, 175–188 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-012-0157-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-012-0157-7

Keywords

Navigation