Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Detailed information of the 15 focal individuals, which participated in the sibling recognition experiment as well as the randomly chosen sibling targets.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Figure 1.

Percentage of correct and wrong choices of all 15 focal individuals on the penultimate and ultimate day of the recognition task.

81.25% and above marks a performance above chance (dotted line). Asterisks mark significant differences: p<0.001.

More »

Figure 1 Expand

Table 2.

Performance of the 15 focal individuals on the penultimate and ultimate days when goslings passed the task, or of the 40th and 41st days of the individuals that did not pass (DNP) the task in the allotted time.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Statistical results of the generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) to determine possible influences on the performance in the recognition task.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Figure 2.

Percentage of correct choices of family groups A, B, and C on the penultimate and ultimate day of the recognition task.

More »

Figure 2 Expand