InfluentialPoints.com
Biology, images, analysis, design...
Aphids Find them How to ID ID by host
"It has long been an axiom of mine that the little things are infinitely the most important" (Sherlock Holmes)

Aphidinae : Aphidini : Rhopalosiphum oxyacanthae : spp. list
 

 

Rhopalosiphum oxyacanthae (=Rhopalosiphum insertum)

Apple-grass aphid

On this page: Identification & Distribution Biology & Ecology Other aphids on the same host Damage & Control

Identification & Distribution:

Rhopalosiphum oxyacanthae apterae (see first picture below) on apple are small light green to yellow-green aphids that are elongate-oval in shape. They have fairly well-marked dark green stripes down the centre of the back with cross bars and along each side. The 5-segmented antennae are about a third the length of the body. The frontal head tubercles are low, with the median frontal tubercle about the same height as the antennal tubercles. The siphunculi are quite short - about one tenth as long as the body - slightly swollen subapically, and pale with dusky tips. The body length of the adult aptera on the primary host is 2.1-2.6 mm.

Winged Rhopalosiphum oxyacanthae viviparae (see second picture above) have a blackish head, thorax and siphunculi and a green abdomen with some brown plates and pigmentation. The apple-grass aphid aptera on its secondary host - grass roots - (see first picture below) is pale green, yellowish green or bluish green with no clear markings. The antennae are normally 5-segmented and much shorter than half the body length. The siphunculi are brown, 0.11-0.13 times the body length and nearly twice the length of the cauda. The body length of the apterous adult on the secondary host is 1.1-1.9 mm.

The second picture below shows the alate form that has returned to apple from the secondary host in autumn.

The apple-grass aphid host alternates between apple and related species (Rosaceae: Cotoneaster, Crataegus, Malus, Pyrus, Sorbus) and the roots of various Grasses (Poaceae). It has a sexual stage in its life cycle with eggs laid on apple. The first generation in March induces curling perpendicular to the mid-rib of the young leaves of the primary host. Apple-grass aphids may be attended by ants. Winged forms migrate in late May-June to the underground parts of various grasses, but colonies may persist into summer on primary hosts. Rhopalosiphum oxyacanthae is found in Europe and Japan.

 

Biology & Ecology:

Evenhuis (1968) provides an excellent description of the life cycle of Rhopalosiphum oxyacanthae through the year. The aphid hibernates in the egg stage on apple and related plants. The eggs start hatching in late March, and most of the eggs have hatched by about mid-April.

The first fundatrices (stem mothers) are usually full-grown by the second half of April, as shown in the picture below.

In April they come under attack from a range of parasitoids and predators. The first picture below shows an apterous nymph exuding liquid from its siphunculi. This liquid contains alarm pheromones and was probably exuded in response to an attack by a parasitoid or predator.

 

The second picture above shows an aphid mummy parasitized by the braconid Monoctonus cerasi. This is the commonest parasitoid of the apple aphid. In autumn it hibernates as a full-grown larva within the dead, mummified aphid host, often in bark crevices. The adults then emerge early next spring in the season, and attack the maturing fundatrices.

 

The first picture above shows an adult Monoctonus searching for apple aphids in April. The parasitized aphids are mummified and, within a few days, the second generation of parasitoids emerge. These then attack the next generation of aphids on apple. However, some mummies are themselves attacked by hyperparasites which kill the parasitoid larva. Four hymenopterous hyperparasites have been bred from aphids on apple - the second picture above shows Asaphes vulgaris (Miscogasteridae).

Syrphid larvae (Diptera, Syrphidae = hoverflies) may be more important in reducing the number of aphids. The larva pictured below is probably Syrphus ribesii, although Syrphus vitripennis and Epistrophe balteata are also commonly bred from apple-grass aphid colonies on apple.

 

It is difficult to appraise the real importance of syrphids in respect to the apple-grass aphid. Evenhuis (1968) had the impression that they were not very important, as he found them in larger numbers only when the population density of the aphids was rather high. We however are less certain about this as early in the year we have observed quite heavily infested trees to be apparently 'cleansed' of aphids by small numbers of syrphid larvae.

The surviving aphid progeny of the fundatrices become full-grown, winged aphids from the beginning of May. These then migrate to quite a number of grass species, where they pass through a number of parthenogenetic generations on the roots of grasses. Winged females return to apple trees in the autumn and produce oviparae. The developing oviparae are often attacked by the third generation of aphid parasitoids (Monoctonus) which did not follow them on to grasses, but went into a state of summer diapause on apple. The surviving oviparae complete their development on the undersides of the leaves, and mate with winged males which migrate to the orchard in late autumn. Eggs are then laid in the spurs, on the older shoots and at the bases of the buds, mostly where the bark is fairly rough.

 

Other aphids on same host:

Primary hosts
Secondary hosts

Blackman & Eastop list 66 species of aphid as feeding on grass roots (Poaceae) worldwide (Show world list). Of those aphid species, Baker (2015) lists 21 as occurring in Britain (Show British list).

 

Damage and control

Whilst the first generation can induce leaf curling, it is more commonly caused not by aphids, but by apple powdery mildew (see picture below). This is a serious disease which is normally controlled by application of fungicide. Large numbers of apple-grass aphid can induce leaf curling perpendicular to the mid-rib, but the tree seems to rapidly recover from the damage once the aphids move to grasses in May. Hence most authorities do not consider apple-grass aphid very harmful.

Since Rhopalosiphum oxyacanthae is the only apple aphid that overwinters on apple, Evenhuis (1968) argued that a winter wash against aphids in apple orchards made no sense. A better approach is to await spring and check what species are present. A fairly high initial apple-grass aphid population may be tolerated, because they will all leave by the end of May. If rosy apple aphids are detected, then control measures may be needed.

Orchard Pest Management Online, 2012 suggest the presence of apple-grass aphid can even be beneficial, as it may encourage aphid natural enemies to build up in early spring, increasing chances of natural control of other pest aphids. Contrary to this point of view, Mowat & Clawson (1996) considered that Rhopalosiphum oxyacanthae was an important pest in Northern Irish apple orchards and recommended an economic spray threshold of 30 trusses infested per 25 trees during green cluster to pink bud stage. However, Cuthberton & Murchie (2006) found that even when numbers in orchards in Northern Ireland exceeded recommended spray thresholds, there was no significant fruit loss. Moreover, numbers of apple-grass aphid were much higher in managed orchards where acaricide and aphicides were applied than in unmanaged orchards where only fungicides were used.

We should also consider whether Rhopalosiphum oxyacanthae attains pest status on its summer host, namely grasses and (sometimes) cereal crops. The apple-grass aphid is known to be an efficient vector of at least some barley yellow dwarf virus serotypes, but its importance as a crop pest is considered to be minor because it seldom colonises cereal crops. However, Teulon et al. (1999) suggest its importance may have been underestimated because it lives underground and is similar to the known cereal pest Rhopalosiphum padi. In New Zealand they found that Rhopalosiphum oxyacanthae made up a substantial proportion of cereal-inhabiting aphids in autumn-sown cereal crops as well as in some suction trap catches.

Acknowledgements

Whilst we make every effort to ensure that identifications are correct, we cannot absolutely warranty their accuracy. We have mostly made identifications from high resolution photos of living specimens, along with host plant identity. In the great majority of cases, identifications have been confirmed by microscopic examination of preserved specimens. We have used the keys and species accounts of Blackman & Eastop (1994) and Blackman & Eastop (2006) supplemented with Blackman (1974), Stroyan (1977), Stroyan (1984), Blackman & Eastop (1984), Heie (1980-1995), Dixon & Thieme (2007) and Blackman (2010). We fully acknowledge these authors as the source for the (summarized) taxonomic information we have presented. Any errors in identification or information are ours alone, and we would be very grateful for any corrections. For assistance on the terms used for aphid morphology we suggest the figure provided by Blackman & Eastop (2006).

Useful weblinks

References

  • Cuthbertson, A.G.S. & Murchie, A.K. (2006). Environmental monitoring of economically important invertebrate pests in Bramley apple orchards in Northern Ireland. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. Supplement Winter 2006, 3(1), 1-7.  Full text

  • Evenhuis, H.H. (1968). The natural control of the apple-grass aphid, Rhopalosiphum insertum, with remarks on the control of apple aphids in The Netherlands in general. Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology 74, 106-117. Abstract Full text

  • Mowat, D.J. & Clawson, S. (1996). The need for pest control in Northern Ireland Bramley apple orchards. Crop Protection in Northern Britain 2, 225-230.

  • Orchard Pest Management Online. Apple grain aphid. Full text

  • Stroyan, H.L.G. (1952). The identification of aphids of economic importance. Plant Pathology 1, 92-99.

  • Teulon, D.A.J. et al. (1999). Apple grass aphid (Rhopalosiphum insertum) on cereals in Canterbury. Proceedings of the 52nd New Zealand Plant Protection Conference 1999, 192-198.  Full text