Europe PMC
Do data resources managed by EMBL-EBI and our collaborators make a difference to your work?
If so, please take 10 minutes to fill in our survey, and help us make the case for why sustaining open data resources is critical for life sciences research.

This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing to this as outlined in our privacy notice and cookie policy.

Abstract 


Five species of Hymenoscyphus that fruit on black stromatized parts of dead leaves of deciduous trees are presented, giving details on their morphological and ecological characteristics. Several of these species have previously been misplaced in rutstroemiaceous genera because of the presence of a substratal stroma. However, the heteropolar, scutuloid ascospores with an often hook-like lateral protrusion at the rounded apex and the ascus apical ring of the Hymenoscyphus-type represent two reliable morphological characteristics that, together with molecular data, provide clear evidence for their placement in the genus Hymenoscyphus (Helotiaceae). Among the species treated is Hymenoscyphus fraxineus (=Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus), the causal agent of the European ash dieback disease. Since 1992 this species started within Europe to replace the rather uncommon Hymenoscyphus albidus, which is likewise confined to leaves of Fraxinus. Hy. fraxineus has been recorded already since 1990 in Eastern Asia (Japan, Korea, northeast of China), where it had been initially misidentified as Lambertella albida (≡Hy. albidus). In these regions, it occurs as a harmless saprotroph on Fraxinus mandshurica and Fraxinus rhynchophylla, suggesting that those populations are native while the European ash dieback disease has a recent Eastern Asiatic origin. The distinctly higher genetic diversity found in Japanese Hy. fraxineus in contrast to European Hy. fraxineus supports this view. Genetic similarities between Japanese Hy. fraxineus and European Hy. albidus suggest that also Hy. albidus might be a descendant of Asian Hy. fraxineus, though having invaded Europe much earlier. However, consistent genetic deviation between European and Asian Hy. fraxineus at two nucleotide positions of the ITS region indicates that the European ash disease originates from a region different from the presently known areas in Eastern Asia. Our results underline the importance of detailed morphological studies in combination with molecular work. Hy. fraxineus was described from Europe as a cryptic species that differed from Hy. albidus by molecular data alone. However, the Hy. albidus/Hy. fraxineus species complex represents one of many examples within the ascomycetes in which subtle microscopic differences between closely related species, in this case the presence or absence of croziers at the ascus base, are strictly correlated with molecular characteristics. Two species that closely resemble Hy. albidus and Hy. fraxineus form pseudosclerotia in Aesculus leaves and again differ from each other mainly in the ascus base: Hymenoscyphus aesculi on Aesculus hippocastanum from Europe lacks croziers, whereas Hymenoscyphus honshuanus from Japan on Aesculus turbinata possesses croziers. Other taxa treated here include Hymenoscyphus vacini, a European species growing on stromatized net veins of skeletonized leaves of Acer, and Hymenoscyphus torquatus, a Chinese species on unidentified herbaceous stems. An equivalent stroma-forming North American species on leaves of Fraxinus, Rutstroemia longipes (Rutstroemiaceae), is discussed and compared. A key to the Hymenoscyphus species that form a dark stroma on leaves of Acer, Aesculus, Fraxinus, and Picrasma is provided.

Free full text 


Logo of taylorfranopenLink to Publisher's site
Mycology. 2014 Oct 2; 5(4): 228–290.
Published online 2014 Oct 14. https://doi.org/10.1080/21501203.2014.963720
PMCID: PMC4270420
PMID: 25544935

Hymenoscyphus fraxineus vs. Hymenoscyphus albidus – A comparative light microscopic study on the causal agent of European ash dieback and related foliicolous, stroma-forming species

Abstract

Five species of Hymenoscyphus that fruit on black stromatized parts of dead leaves of deciduous trees are presented, giving details on their morphological and ecological characteristics. Several of these species have previously been misplaced in rutstroemiaceous genera because of the presence of a substratal stroma. However, the heteropolar, scutuloid ascospores with an often hook-like lateral protrusion at the rounded apex and the ascus apical ring of the Hymenoscyphus-type represent two reliable morphological characteristics that, together with molecular data, provide clear evidence for their placement in the genus Hymenoscyphus (Helotiaceae). Among the species treated is Hymenoscyphus fraxineus (=Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus), the causal agent of the European ash dieback disease. Since 1992 this species started within Europe to replace the rather uncommon Hymenoscyphus albidus, which is likewise confined to leaves of Fraxinus. Hy. fraxineus has been recorded already since 1990 in Eastern Asia (Japan, Korea, northeast of China), where it had been initially misidentified as Lambertella albida (≡Hy. albidus). In these regions, it occurs as a harmless saprotroph on Fraxinus mandshurica and Fraxinus rhynchophylla, suggesting that those populations are native while the European ash dieback disease has a recent Eastern Asiatic origin. The distinctly higher genetic diversity found in Japanese Hy. fraxineus in contrast to European Hy. fraxineus supports this view. Genetic similarities between Japanese Hy. fraxineus and European Hy. albidus suggest that also Hy. albidus might be a descendant of Asian Hy. fraxineus, though having invaded Europe much earlier. However, consistent genetic deviation between European and Asian Hy. fraxineus at two nucleotide positions of the ITS region indicates that the European ash disease originates from a region different from the presently known areas in Eastern Asia.

Our results underline the importance of detailed morphological studies in combination with molecular work. Hy. fraxineus was described from Europe as a cryptic species that differed from Hy. albidus by molecular data alone. However, the Hy. albidus/Hy. fraxineus species complex represents one of many examples within the ascomycetes in which subtle microscopic differences between closely related species, in this case the presence or absence of croziers at the ascus base, are strictly correlated with molecular characteristics. Two species that closely resemble Hy. albidus and Hy. fraxineus form pseudosclerotia in Aesculus leaves and again differ from each other mainly in the ascus base: Hymenoscyphus aesculi on Aesculus hippocastanum from Europe lacks croziers, whereas Hymenoscyphus honshuanus from Japan on Aesculus turbinata possesses croziers. Other taxa treated here include Hymenoscyphus vacini, a European species growing on stromatized net veins of skeletonized leaves of Acer, and Hymenoscyphus torquatus, a Chinese species on unidentified herbaceous stems. An equivalent stroma-forming North American species on leaves of Fraxinus, Rutstroemia longipes (Rutstroemiaceae), is discussed and compared. A key to the Hymenoscyphus species that form a dark stroma on leaves of Acer, Aesculus, Fraxinus, and Picrasma is provided.

Nomenclatural novelties: Hymenoscyphus aesculi comb. nov. (for Helotium/Lanzia aesculi), Hy. honshuanus nom. nov. (for Lambertellinia scutuloides), Hy. torquatus comb. nov. (for Lambertella torquata)
Keywords: croziers, simple septa, homothallism, pseudosclerotium, Fraxinus, Aesculus, Acer, Helotiaceae, Rutstroemiaceae, invasive species, morphology, molecular markers

Introduction

Ash dieback is a serious disease in Europe causing death of European ash. The disease is caused by Hymenoscyphus fraxineus (T. Kowalski) Baral et al. (≡Chalara fraxinea T. Kowalski, =Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus Queloz et al.), which was recently introduced from Asia and has rapidly replaced the non-pathogenic European species Hymenoscyphus albidus. The present study outlines the introduction and cause of the disease, and compares closely related harmless species on ash and other hosts.

Hymenoscyphus albidus, a saprotroph on leaves of European ash

In late summer and early autumn, Hy. albidus (Roberge ex Gillet) W. Phillips forms white stipitate apothecia on fallen, previous year’s rachises (here used for the entire main axis including the basal petiole) and leaflet veins of the pinnate leaves of ash (Fraxinus excelsior, Oleaceae, Lamiales). During the past 150 years, the species has infrequently been recorded in temperate and montane Europe. It can be assumed that the ascospores infect living leaves, and the mycelium grows endophytically inside them, similar as it is known in Hy. fraxineus. Quite a long time after the leaves have fallen, and after the leaf blades have disappeared, the fungus forms a very thin black stromatic layer on the surface of the remaining rachises and veins, which is referred to as ‘pseudosclerotial plate’. This layer becomes slowly apparent during the winter months, and might serve as a protection of the underlying hyphae against ultraviolet light, or to avoid invasion into the pseudosclerotium by hyphae of other species. The terms pseudosclerotium and pseudosclerotial plate were adopted by Kowalski and Holdenrieder (2009) and Queloz et al. (2011) in the Hy. albidus complex, although they are somewhat ambiguously defined (see Gross & Holdenrieder 2013).

Due to the black pseudosclerotium, the fungus was placed by some authors in the genus Lanzia Sacc. or Lambertella Höhn. (Sclerotiniaceae, now Rutstroemiaceae). However, the type of ascus apical ring and the heteropolar (scutuloid) ascospores refer it to the genus Hymenoscyphus Gray (Baral & Krieglsteiner 1985, p. 121). This placement was meanwhile confirmed by molecular data (Queloz et al. 2011).

Appearance of a second species of Hymenoscyphus

Recent research on the current epidemic ash dieback in Europe revealed the asexual state Ch. fraxinea as the causal agent of ash disease (Kowalski 2006), which, by molecular comparison, proved to be connected to a sexual morph (Kowalski & Holdenrieder 2009), though at first misidentified as Hymenoscyphus albidus. A molecular study by Queloz et al. (2011) on a variety of teleomorph collections, mainly from Switzerland, revealed that in fact two different ascocarp-forming species fruit on the blackened rachises of ash, which could not be distinguished morphologically. One of them (Hy. albidus) proved to be rather harmless, whereas the other represented the serious pathogen. The latter was described as a new species, Hy. pseudoalbidus Queloz et al., based mainly on the deviating rDNA sequence. It formed slightly longer ascospores and larger fruit bodies, but was otherwise thought to concur completely with Hy. albidus and was, therefore, referred to as a ‘cryptic species’ (Queloz et al. 2011).

Apothecia of Hy. fraxineus, as the holomorph of Ch. fraxinea/Hy. pseudoalbidus is now called, have been collected in Europe at least since 2006 (two collections dating from 1978 and 1987 as listed in the specimens examined by Queloz et al. 2011 were based on confused DNA sequences and concern Hy. albidus, Queloz et al. 2012). The symptoms of leaf wilting were first observed in the northeastern part of Poland in 1992 (Kirisits et al. 2009), and the first isolate of its asexual state dates from December 2000 and represents the type culture of Ch. fraxinea (Kowalski 2006).

Between 2000 and 2010, the invasive fungus spread to the west and south of Central Europe, to southern parts of Northern Europe, and to Eastern and Southeastern Europe (Kirisits 2010), and during 2008–2013 it invaded Great Britain (Hendry 2013). In the last years, Hy. albidus could still be found in high-montane areas of Central Europe (see Queloz et al. 2011), Southern and Southeastern Europe (N. Matočec & I. Kušan personal communication), in Atlantic lowland regions of Western Europe and in boreal to continental regions of Northern and Eastern Europe, where Hy. fraxineus did so far only as an exception expand or now occurs sympatric. Hy. albidus appears to be extinct all over Central Europe north of the Alps.

Besides the here treated Hymenoscyphus honshuanus Baral, Hymenoscyphus aesculi (Velen.) Baral & E. Rubio, and Hymenoscyphus vacini (Velen.) Baral & E. Weber, a further species was recently described, Hy. albidoides (Zheng & Zhuang 2014). It was found fruiting in Eastern China on blackened veins of leaves of Picrasma quassioides (Simaroubaceae, Sapindales). In its morphological characters, this species can hardly be distinguished from Hy. fraxineus, except for the shape of the crystals in the stipe base, but its molecular data significantly deviate. Another species was recently detected in Japan growing on rachises of Fraxinus platypodia, which will be described in a separate paper as Hymenoscyphus linearis Hosoya, A. Gross & Baral. It concurs microscopically quite well with Hy. albidus but forms very narrow, linear stromata of considerable length. We have included both species in our dichotomous key.

Purpose of study

The observation by the first author of striking and unequivocal deviations in the ascus base within European populations collected in 1988–1991 (simple septate) and 2006–2010 (croziers) raised the question whether this character is correlated with the observed molecular markers and, as a consequence, Hy. albidus can be distinguished from Hy. fraxineus by morphological methods. In course of this study, a large number of fresh as well as herbarium specimens were examined in order to verify the presence or absence of croziers and to compare the result with the available molecular data. A detailed documentation of teleomorph morphology was made in order to clarify whether further distinguishing features exist. Japanese herbarium material of H fraxineus [originally identified as Lambertella albida (Roberge ex Gillet) Korf] was included in this study in order to find out whether differences exist to European Hy. fraxineus.

Materials and methods

Microscopy

Collections were examined preferably in the living state, but also from rehydrated herbarium material, using a Zeiss Standard 14 and a Zeiss Standard KF microscope equipped with achromatic and plan-apochromatic objectives. Tap water (H2O) was used as a standard medium, and viability of cells was evaluated in that medium according to Baral (1992). The iodine reaction was tested with Lugol’s solution (IKI = ~1% I2, 2% KI, in H2O), without (rarely with) pre-treatment by potassium hydroxide (KOH 3–5%). Brilliant Cresyl Blue (CRB, ~1% in H2O) added to a water mount was used for testing the presence of gel, also for vital staining of the refractive vacuoles (VBs). For testing the presence of croziers, fresh apothecia were sectioned free-hand, and sections transferred to the slide in a drop of H2O; any pressure on the cover slip was avoided during preparation. In the case of herbarium specimens, hymenial fragments (mainly sections) were placed in a drop of H2O, to which a small drop of KOH and often also one of aqueous Congo Red (CR) was added. Alternatively, CRSDS (SDS = sodium dodecyl sulphate) was applied to a water mount. Dissolution of the oil drops (lipid bodies, LBs) by ethanol was conducted as follows: a dry apothecium was rehydrated and a fragment placed in 90% ethanol for ½ min; then the ethanol was removed and a drop of 3% KOH and one of 1% phloxine was added. Waterman blue-black ink was applied for a better visibility of ascospore sheaths. Photographic images (macro- and microphotos) were obtained using a Nikon Coolpix E4500 and a Nikon Coolpix 5000 (Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). All drawings are free-hand.

Abbreviations

* = living state, † = dead state, n.v. = non visus (specimen or documentation not seen by us), d.v. = documentum visus (photos/drawings/descriptions seen by us), sq. = sequence of ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 region, vid. = examined, ø = unpreserved, # = not tested for the ascus base. Values in curled parenthesis {} refer to the number of collections that were examined or, after the host plant and the associated taxa, the number of certain/uncertain records. Countries are abbreviated according to the ISO 3166 two-letter standard code.

Herbaria

Type and other herbarium material was studied from CUP (Cornell University, Ithaca, New York), HMIPC (Mycological Herbarium of the Department of Forest Pathology of Kraków), LUX (Musée national d’histoire naturelle Luxembourg), NMLU (Natur-Museum Luzern), PRM (National Museum, Praha), TNS (National Museum of Nature and Science, Tsukuba), and ZT (Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich), and two specimens were deposited in STU (Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart) and KR (Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Karlsruhe). Mentioned herbaria from which material was not examined are the following: FH (Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts), GENT (Ghent University, Belgium), K (Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, London), KUS (Korea University), PC (Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris). Additional collections are held in the private herbaria of A.G. = Alain Gardiennet (Véronnes, Côte d’Or), B.D. = Bernard Declercq (Stekene, Eastern Flanders), C.B. = Céline Besch (†, Mertert, Luxembourg, in LUX), C.Y. = Chris Yeates (Huddersfield, West Yorkshire), E.R.D. = Enrique Rubio (Salinas near Avilés, Asturias), G.K. = Gerhard Koller (Mattersburg Burgenland), G.M. = Guy Marson (Hesperange, Luxembourg), H.B. = H.-O. Baral, H.E. = Heinz Engel (Weidhausen near Coburg), H.H. = Hans Haas (†, Stuttgart, in STU), M.B. = Martin Bemmann, M.H. = Michel Hairaud (Poivendre de Marigny, Deux-Sèvres), M.T. = Marie-Thérèse Tholl (Doncols, Luxembourg), R.D. = René Dougoud (Fribourg, Switzerland), S.Å.H. = Sven-Åke Hanson, S.H. = Stip Helleman (Boxmeer, Noord-Brabant), W.D. = Wolfgang Dämon (St. Georgen, Salzburg), W.W. = Wulfard Winterhoff (Sandhausen near Heidelberg).

Taxonomy

Hymenoscyphus albidus (Roberge ex Gillet) W. Phillips, Man. Brit. Discomyc. (London): 138 (1887) (as Hymenoscypha albida) – Figures 1 44

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is tmyc-5-228-g001.jpg

Hymenoscyphus albidus: a. paraphysis containing vacuolar bodies (=VBs); b. freshly ejected ascospores, containing oil drops (=LBs); c. simple-septate ascogenous hyphae without crozier formation; d. ascus apex with euamyloid apical ring (Hymenoscyphus-type); e. apothecium. – living state (except for d).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is tmyc-5-228-g004.jpg

Hymenoscyphus albidus: a, d. median section of receptacle (ee = ectal excipulum, me = medullary excipulum); b. surface view on bright yellowish-ochraceous exudate covering the stipe base; c. paraphyses containing guttular VBs, immature and mature asci; e. median section of ectal excipulum at transition of stipe and receptacle; f–h. paraphyses (containing ± elongate VBs; f: under vital staining, g–h: VBs distorted in dead state); i–m. ascospores (containing large and small LBs; j–k: dead shrunken spores showing confluent LBs); n. ascus apices with euamyloid apical ring; p–u. ascus bases arising from simple septa. – Living state: a–d, f (in CRB), i, l–m; dead state: g (in H2O), h (in IKI), n (in IKI), j–k, p–u (in KOH or KOH+CR). – a–b, d–j, l. H.B. 9699 (FR-PC, Granzay-Gript); c, m. 16.VI.2007 (ibid.); k. H.B. 9611 (BE-LUX, Florenville); n. LUX 047699 (LU, Kehlen); o. ZT 3295 (CH-TI, Aquarossa); p. 21.VII.2007 (CH-ZG, Unterägeri); q. H.B. 9454 (CH-LU, Aesch); r. H.B. 1950 (DE-BW, Stockach); s. ZT 3299 (CH-BE, Eymatt); t. ZT 3294 (CH-TI, Lavorgo); u. ZT 3293 (FR-BN, Bellême). – Phot. c, l–m: M. Hairaud.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is tmyc-5-228-g002.jpg

Hymenoscyphus albidus: a–j. apothecia emerging from black pseudosclerotia in rachises of Fraxinus excelsior (e–f: in median section). – a–i: fresh state, j: dry state. – a–f. H.B. 9699 (FR-PC, Granzay-Gript); g–h. 21.VII.2007 (CH-ZG, Unterägeri); i. 24.VI.2007 (FR-PC, Poitevin); j. H.B. 9454 (CH-LU, Aesch). – Phot. g–h: U. Graf, i: M. Hairaud.

  • Peziza albida Roberge in Desm., Pl. Crypt. N. France, #2004 (1850), Annls. Sci. Nat., Bot., sér. 3, 16: 323 (1851), nom. illegit. [ICBN Art. 53.1, non Peziza albida With. 1792, nec P. albida Sowerby 1799, nec P. albida (All.) Lam. 1804]

  • Helotium scutula var. albidum (Roberge in Desm.) P. Karst. Bidr. Känn. Finl. Nat. Folk 19: 112 (1871) [nom. nov., ICBN Art. 58, as He. scutula var. η albidum (Desm.) Karst.]

  • Phialea albida Roberge ex Gillet, Champignons de France, Discomyc., livr. 4, p. 105 (1881) [1879] [nom. nov., ICBN Art. 58, as Phialea albida Desm.]

  • Helotium albidum (Roberge ex Gillet) Pat., Tabl. analyt. Fung. France (Paris) 4: 173 (1885) nom. illegit. [ICBN Art. 53.1, non Helotium albidum P. & H. Crouan 1867, nec Helotium albidum (With.) P. Karst. 1884 (as ‘albellum’)]

  • Helotium robergei Dennis, Mycol. Pap. 62: 93 (1956) [nom. nov., ICBN Art. 53.1]

  • Lanzia albida (Roberge ex Gillet) S.E. Carp., Mem. N. Y. Bot. Gdn 33: 187 (1981) [as (Roberge & Desm.) S.E. Carp.]

  • Lambertella albida (Roberge ex Gillet) Korf, Mycotaxon 14(1): 2 (1982)

Etymology

Albidus: named after the white colour of the apothecia, robergei: after M.R. Roberge.

Lectoype (selected by White (1944))

France, Calvados, [(?) NE of Caen, Bois de Lébisey,] rachises of F. excelsior, summer ca. 1850, M.R. Roberge (Desm., Pl. Crypt. N. France, Ed. 1, n° 2004, FH; not seen).

Apothecia

Moist (0.8–)1–2.5(–4) mm diam., receptacle 0.24–0.4 mm thick (at margin 0.15–0.2 mm), ±round, scattered; disc whitish to very pale cream, turning reddish-brown when bruised, slightly concave to flat; margin distinct, up to 70 µm protruding, finely pubescent, exterior concolorous, stipe 0.2–1.5 mm long, 0.25–0.5 mm wide at the base, 0.4–7(–1) mm below receptacle, white, pubescent, whole exterior finely striate, turning reddish-brown with age, at base light reddish-brown, with a black basal collar, ±erumpent from sclerenchyma-phloem layer; dry with cream-ochraceous to orange disc. Asci *(75–)80–110(–125) {5} × 9–11.5 µm {4}, †(67–)75–100(–116) {7} × 7.5–8.5 {2} or (8.5–)9–9.5(–10) {5} µm, 8-spored, spores *obliquely biseriate, pars sporifera *44–53 µm long; apex (†) conical, dome †2–3 → 1–1.3 µm thick, apical ring occupying lower 1/3–3/4 of dome, medium to strongly blue (bb) in IKI, ring apically gradually or abruptly fading, Hymenoscyphus-type {8}; base arising from simple septa {27}, never with a subbasal protuberance. Ascospores *(13.5–)14.5–18.5(–20.5) × (3.5–)4–4.8(–5) µm {9}, †(13–)14–19(–21.3) × (3–)3.5–4.2(–4.5) µm {6}, slightly to strongly scutuloid, with ± cylindrical middle part, apex rounded to obtuse, with a slight to strong lateral protrusion, base medium attenuated, with ± blunt, never acute end, straight to inequilateral or medium curved, especially at the apex, containing 1–3(–4) large LBs in each half [(1–)2–3(–3.5) µm diam.], associated with many small LBs 0.3–1 µm diam. {6}, lipid content 5, rarely a very delicate sheath was seen that slips off the spore, without setulae; wall surface CRB–; overmature spores not observed. Paraphyses apically uninflated, terminal cell *40–61 × 3–4 µm {1}, †40–62 × 2–2.7 µm {1}, lower cells *9–23(–27) × (2–)3–4 µm {1}, †12.5–22 × 2–3 µm {1}; branched only in lower part, anastomoses not seen. Medullary excipulum hyaline, of a loose textura intricata, individual cells *(20–)35–73(–80) × (3–)5–10(–16) µm {2}, delimited from ectal excipulum by an 50–100 µm thick layer of textura porrecta, cells *35–85 × 3–8 µm, all hyphae covered by thin gel staining deep lilac in CRB. Ectal excipulum hyaline, at flanks of (*) slightly († medium) gelatinized textura prismatica(–porrecta), 30–40 µm thick, cells *15–35(–50) × (6–)8–13(–17) µm {1}, †7–11(–14) µm wide {1}, oriented at a (0–)10–30(–40)° angle to the surface, walls †1–1.5(–2) µm thick, common walls 2–4 µm, CRB–; 20–25 µm thick at margin, oriented at 0°; in stipe of 25–50 µm thick, of (†) slightly gelatinized t. angularis(-globulosa) oriented irregularly or t. prismatica oriented at 0°, cells *7.5–15(–20) × 5–7 or 7–10(–17 µm) {1}; whole exterior of receptacle and stipe covered by a 10–15 µm thick layer of cortical hyphae forming a loose network in surface view, individual cells *11–20 × 3–5 µm, partly forming projecting or appressed hair-like protrusions *10–45 × 3–5 µm, 1–3-celled, straight to irregularly flexuous. Crystals absent in complete tissue, except for medullary tissue in lower region of stipe at a length of ~200 µm, here forming abundant druses 10–20 µm diam., made up of rhomboid, KOH-inert individual crystals 7–15 µm diam. VBs in paraphyses medium to strongly refractive {6}, hyaline, turning light yellowish-ochre in dead state, young multiguttulate then angular to shortly elongate, finally very elongate, occupying upper 30–50(–70) µm {3} (terminal and partly first lower cell), staining bright turquoise in CRB and light reddish-brown in IKI. Exudate pale yellowish-ochraceous, smooth to rough, covering cortical hyphae of receptacle and stipe, more bright-coloured towards base of stipe. Anamorph: unknown.

Habitat

various subassociations of Alnetum, Fagetum, Fraxinetum, Fraxino-Aceretum, Pruno-Fraxinetum, Salicetum, (Querco-)Ulmetum, on fallen previous year’s blackened rachises {34} or rarely primary veins {4}, exceptionally on a corticated, blackened, 1 mm thick twig {1}, of F. excelsior {36}, lying on ground. Assoc.: None. Desiccation tolerance: not tested. Geology: basalt, limestone, sandstone, Knollenmergel. Phenology: (VI–)VII–IX(–X). Altitude: 3–1690 m.

Specimens included

All on rachises of F. excelsior, two records on Acer possibly concern in fact Fraxinus; list incomplete concerning records not examined by us.

Sweden: Skåne, 7.5 km ENE of Helsingborg, 1.2 km SSE of Kropp, Ljungberga, 42 m, 24.VIII.1994, S.Å. Hanson (S.Å.H. 15290). – The Netherlands: Gelderland, 6 km SW of Nijmegen, W of Meijhorst, Staddijkpark, 8 m, 7.VII.2007, S. Helleman (S.H. 444, H.B. 9854). – Belgium: West Vlaanderen, 5 km ENE of Kortrijk, 1.8 km SE of Harelbeke, De Gavers, 14 m, 30.IX.1989, B. Declercq (B.D. 89/118, n.v.). – 17 km NNE of Brugge, ESE of Knokke-Zoute, Koningsbos, 8 m, 24.VIII.1994, B. Declercq (B.D. 94/108, as Pyrus communis, H.B. 9847). – Oost Vlaanderen, 24 km NE of Ghent, 3.2 km NW of Sinaai, Heirnisse, 5 m, 16.VII.1994, B. Declercq (B.D. 94/092, d.v.). – Luxembourg, 21 km SW of Arlon, 3 km NNE of Virton, Bois de Virton, 250 m, 13.VIII.1989, B. Declercq (B.D. 89/076, d.v.). – ~7 km SSE of Florenville, Orval, ~200 m, partly on veins, ~5.IX.1990, C. Besch 1091 (C.B. 1091, LUX 047702, H.B. 9611ø). – Luxembourg: Gutland, 7 km W of Echternach, Schnellert, ~200 m, partly on a twig, 14.VII.1985, C. Besch (C.B. 183, LUX 047701, H.B. 9612ø). – 3 km NE of Grevenmacher, 1 km WNW of Mertert, N of Schënnerkaul, S of Fausermillen, 155 m, on petiole of ‘Acer pseudoplatanus’, 24.IX.1990, H.O. Baral, C. Besch & C.M. Swart-Velthuyzen (ø). – 8 km NW of Luxembourg, 1.3 km E of Kehlen, Maasselter, 370 m, 17.VII.1988, C. Besch (C.B. 181, LUX 047699, H.B. 9619ø). – 3 km N of Grevenmacher, E of Manternach, Syre, ~200 m, 15.VIII.1985, C. Besch (C.B. 182, LUX 047700, H.B. 9620ø). – Germany: Rheinland-Pfalz, 9 km NE of Pirmasens, 3 km SE of Waldfischbach-Burgalben, near Ruine Heidelsburg, 280 m, partly on veins, ~3.IX.1989, B. Mauer (H.B. 3841, sq.). – Baden-Württemberg, 6 km NE of Tübingen, 0.5 km ENE of Pfrondorf, Tiefenbach, 400 m, partly on veins, 14.IX.1991, E. Weber & H.O. Baral (ø). – ibid., on primary veins of ‘?Acer’, 3.IX.1988, H.O. Baral (ø). – 12 km W of Stockach, N of Aach, 550 m, 20.VIII.1976, H.O. Baral (H.B. 1950, sq.). – ~4 km NNE of Emmendingen, Stilzerfritz, 350 m, 2.IX.1975, H.O. Baral (H.B. 410ø, #). – ~8 km N of Breisach, ~1 km NW of Burkheim, Rheinauen, 190 m, 6.IX.1975, H.O. Baral (H.B. 411ø, #). – Konstanz, 4 km NE of Radolfzell, 1 km SE of Möggingen, Mindelsee, 410 m, 30.VII.1975, H.O. Baral (STU, ex H.B. 376, H.H. 10409). – 1.6 km SE of Möggingen, Mindelsee, 410 m, 28.VIII.1976, H.O. Baral (ø, #). – 8 km NE of Radolfzell, 2.7 km SE of Bodman, Steckenloch, 440 m, 18.VIII.1976, H.O. Baral (ø, #). – 6.5 km NE of Radolfzell, 1.7 km SW of Bodman, Dettelbach, 500 m, 22.VIII.1976, H.O. Baral (ø, #). – ibid., 460 m, 17.VIII.1977, H.O. Baral (ø, #). – Bayern, 13 km ENE of Ulm, Unterfahlheim, Rühmerhalbinsel, 460 m, 15.VIII.1979, M. Enderle (ø, #). – Liechtenstein: 7 km NNW of Vaduz, 1.4 km SW of Bendern, Bannriet, 445 m, 5.VII.1997, E. Weber & J.P. Prongué (H.B. 5834, sq.). – Switzerland: Fribourg, 15.5 km NW of Bulle, 1 km SE of Villars-Bramard, Bois de Boulogne, 820 m, 14.VIII.2011, R. Dougoud (ZT, ex R.D. 32.28.094.11, n.v.). – 1.1 km E of Villars-Bramard, Bois de Boulogne, Le Mothey, 800 m, 14.VIII.2011, R. Dougoud (ZT, ex R.D. 32.29.094.11, d.v.). – Bern, 4.5 km WNW of Bern, 0.4 km ENE of Eymatt, Bremgartenwald, 508 m, 5.VIII.2009, B. Senn-Irlet (ZT 3300, sq.: GU586878). – 0.5 km E of Eymatt, 530 m, 5.VIII.2009, B. Senn-Irlet (ZT 3299, sq.: GU586877). – Luzern, 24 km NNW of Luzern, 1.2 km E of Aesch, Gitzitobel, 530 m, 4.IX.1978, F. Müller (ZT, H.B. 9454ø, ex NMLU 0409–78 FM 1, sq.: GU586910). – Zug, 3 km SSW of Unterägeri, 0.3 km E of Ochsenfeissi, Haslen, 830 m, 21.VII.2007, U. Graf (ZT 3891, ex NMLU 2107–07, sq.: GU586897). – Ticino, 0.8 km S of Quinto, 0.4 km WNW of Varenzo, 990 m, 26.VII.2009, V. Queloz (ZT 3296, sq.: GU586887, 586888, 586889). – 1.6 km N of Aquarossa, 0.7 km ENE of Castro, 597 m, 28.VII.2009, V. Queloz (ZT 3295, sq.: GU586882, 586883). – 0.3 km SSW of Lavorgo, 616 m, 27.VII.2009, V. Queloz (ZT 3294, sq.: GU586884, 586885, 586886). – France: Basse-Normandie, Calvados, (?) c. 4 km NE of Caen, (?) Bois de Lébisey, (?) 65 m, summer ca. 1850, M.R. Roberge (Desm., Pl. Crypt. N. France, Ed. 1, n° 2004, FH, lectotype; isolectotypes in GENT, K, PC, d.v., sq.: HM193466; Ed. 2, n° 1604, isolectotypes in GENT, FH, K, PC, d.v., sq.: HM193465). – Orne, 3 km NNW of Bellême, near La Herse, 190 m, 28.IX.1995, R. Dougoud (ZT 3293, ex R.D. 22.11.094.95, sq.: GU586876). – Poitous-Charentes, Deux Sèvres, 12.5 km WNW of Niort, 1 km ENE of Le Vanneau-Irleau, Marais Poitevin, 3 m, 24.VI.2007, M. Hairaud (ø, #, d.v.). – 10.5 km SSW of Niort, 1.8 km NW of Granzay-Gript, La Courance, 25 m, 16.VI.2007, M. Hairaud (M.H. 220607ø, #, d.v.). – ibid., 2.VII.2012, M. Hairaud (M.H. 10712, H.B. 9699). – ibid., 8.VII.2014 (ø, n.v.). – 2 km E of Chives, N of Le Vivier Jusseau, 85 m, 5.IX.2012, M. Hairaud (M.H. 050812, n.v.). – ibid., 10.VIII.2013 (ø, n.v.). – S of Bassac, 18 m, 5.VII.2012, M. Hairaud (ø, n.v.). ― Spain: Vasca, Gipuzkoa, 2.2 kmWNW of Aia, 2 km ESE of Urdaneta, Mindi erreka, 295 m, 25.VII.2014, J. Teres, vid. I. Olariaga (ARAN-Fungi 000082, d.v.). ― Atxondogoikoa (Zeanuri), 9 km WNW of Otxandio, 13 km SE of Orozko, 600 m, 18.VIII.2014, J.V. Fernandez (M.B. 10/2014).

Characterization

Morphologically, Hymenoscyphus albidus can be differentiated from Hy. fraxineus with certainty only by the absence of croziers at the ascus base. Further features include comparatively small apothecia (up to 4 mm diam.) growing on often rather small, insular pseudosclerotia, slightly smaller ascospores, and a rather late start of fructification, also the absence of an anamorph in pure culture.

Nomenclature

Korf (1982) and Hosoya et al. (1993) cited Desmazières’s exsiccatum ‘Plant. Crypt. N. France, #2004, 1850’ as basionym of Peziza albida Roberge in Desm., whereas other authors considered the first valid publication to be that of Desmazières (1851, p. 323). A description was only supplied in 1851, where Desmazières referred to the exsiccatum as ‘Rob. in herb.’. The label on the exsiccatum comprises notes on the substrate (on blackened areas of half-rotten rachises of F. excelsior) and phenology (summer), as well as a comparison with Peziza inflexa (=Cyathicula coronata), which is said to resemble in its pale colour and cyathiform shape. Since the Code does not require a minimum text for a diagnosis, Desmazières’ label from his widely distributed edition of exsiccata of Pl. Crypt. N. France meets the requirements for a valid publication of the new taxon. The date of 1850 is somewhat uncertain, however. According to Stafleu and Cowan (1976), the title pages of the fascicles of Pl. Crypt. N. France were preprinted in some cases before distribution and may give a too early date, thus the exact citation of Peziza albida remains unsettled.

Nevertheless, the name Peziza albida is illegitimate because it is a homonym of several older binomials. Therefore, the first legitimate name of the fungus at the species level is Phialea albida Roberge ex Gillet (1881) or Phialea albida Gillet, and this binomial is treated as a nomen novum attributed to Gillet. Likewise, He. albidum (Roberge ex Gillet) Pat. is illegitimate because of homonymy to older binomials. Dennis (1956) created the epithet robergei in order to avoid such homonymy within the genus Helotium Pers. The name He. robergei was in use until Helotium was abandoned by Dennis (1964) in favour of Hymenoscyphus, because of the older Helotium Tode (=Omphalina Quél.). Sharma (1976) and Svrček (1979) combined the epithet robergei in Hymenoscyphus, which is impermissible because here no older competing homonym with the epithet albidus exists.

Some workers have cited the authors of Hymenoscyphus albidus as ‘Roberge ex Desm.’, which would imply that Desmazières validated an invalid diagnosis of Roberge. On the label of Desmazières ‘Plantes Cryptogames Nord du France’ (1850) and in his ‘Notice sur les Plantes Cryptogames’ (1851), the authorship of the diagnosis and discussion to each species is actually difficult to know. We arrived at the conclusion that Desmazières considered himself as the author of a taxon only in those cases of his 1851 paper where ‘Desm.’ or ‘Nob.’ is mentioned after the fungal name. This is not the case in Peziza albida where he wrote ‘Rob. in herb.’. Also we believe that the author of the printed diagnoses of 1850 and 1851 is Desmazières, unless we would gain knowledge of a manuscript or correspondence proving different authorship. The remark ‘Desmaz.’ after the ecology in the 1851 paper is found in all those cases where the remark ‘Rob. in herb.’ or ‘Nob. in herb.’ appears after the fungal binomial, irrespective of whether or not an exsiccatum is cited. We interpret the remark ‘Desmaz.’ as an indication of the authorship of the diagnosis but not of the collection. The phrases ‘Rob.’ or ‘Rob. in herb.’ after the binomial on the printed label of 1850 and the article of 1851 indicate that Desmazières attributed the authorship of the taxon to Roberge, who was probably merely the collector, while Desmazières supplied the description, including the microscopical data.

Shortly after the demise of Roberge and Desmazières, authors were still quite consistent in their citation. Indeed, many of those in the nineteenth century followed Desmazières by citing the author of the taxon as ‘Rob.’, e.g., Roumeguère (1870, p. 130), Berkeley and Broome (1878, p. 29), Patouillard (1885, p. 173), Phillips (1887, p. 138), Rehm (1893, p. 797), and Massee and Crossland (1905, p. 285). Consistent with this citation is the variant ‘Rob. in Desm.’, which can earliest be found in Phillips (1887), and was adopted by Korf (1982) and Hosoya et al. (1993). In contrast, Roumeguère (1891, 1892) cited the authors as ‘R. et D.’ (Roberge & Desm.), hence he considered Desmazières as a coauthor. This version was followed by Boudier (1907, p. 111, 1908, p. 287), Schröter (1893, p. 74), Migula (1913, p. 1167), Dennis (1956), Arendholz (1979), and Carpenter (1981).

A very different view was adopted by Karsten (1871, p. 112), Cooke (1876, p. 132), and Gillet (1881, p. 105), who merely used the citation ‘Desm.’. The similar version ‘Rob. ex Desm.’, used by White (1944) and Cannon et al. (1985), considers Desmazières as a validating author.

We are inclined to adopt here the version ‘Roberge in Desm.’, because Desmazières attributed the authorship to Roberge. In any case, the original binomial was invalid due to homonymy; therefore, the correct author citation for combinations other than Peziza albida is Roberge ex Gillet or merely Gillet.

History of type studies

In or shortly before 1850 a rich collection was made, on which the description of Hy. albidus in Desmazières (1851, p. 323) is based. The sample was divided already in 1850 in a number of duplicates, and disposed as two exsiccata series in Pl. Crypt. N. France (Ed. 1, n° 2004; Ed. 2, n° 1604). For each of the two exsiccata, one duplicate was deposited in the herbarium of CN (Caen, Basse-Normandie), one came in Desmazières’ herbarium which is preserved at PC, and others are now to be found in herbaria such as FH, GENT, and K.

Desmazières (1851) mentioned the two exsiccata in his description, but without specifying which is the type. Apart from this rich collection, a herbarium specimen exists in K that bears Roberge’s handwriting and is apparently not part of the two distributed exsiccata series, but a different, later collection by Roberge, as it bears the note ‘Peziza albida Roberg. (Desm. 2004)’.

Nylander (1868, p. 40) examined two duplicates of Hy. albidus, possibly those from PC, since he was working at the Muséum national d’histoire naturelle, Paris in 1850–1858, and finally moved to Paris in 1863. He mentioned this only in a note under Peziza albidula (Hedw.) P. Karst. [as ‘(Hdw.) Whlnb.’, ≡ Phialea cyathoidea var. albidula (Hedw.) Rehm], in which he gave data on ascus and spore dimensions different from those of Desmazières. Karsten (1871, p. 112) made a description, apparently from type material (presumably in H), because he stated that the species was not yet collected in Finland.

Cooke (1876, p. 132, pl. LXV fig. 297) presented an uncommented microscopic drawing based on Desmazières n° 2004. Massee (1895, p. 260) supplied a description of an authentic specimen of Roberge, and also examined Desmazières n° 2004 which he considered conspecific (both in K). Like Nylander and Cooke, also Massee did not select a type. In the nineteenth century, it was not common usage to specify a single specimen as type when erecting a new taxon.

The American mycologist White (1944, p. 608, fig. 1924) appears to be the first in the twentieth century who re-examined the type collection of Hy. albidus. He considered the two syntypes in FH as conspecific, and gave a thorough and precise redescription. His detailed illustration was based on n° 2004, and in the legend he wrote ‘all from type material, Desm. Pl. Crypt. Fr., Ed. I, 2004 (FH)’. We believe that this statement can be taken as a lectotypification (Art. 7.11, 9.21 ICBN).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is tmyc-5-228-g016.jpg

Hymenoscyphus aesculi: a–b. petiole in median section, showing black stroma and erumpent apothecial growth; pseudosclerotial plate occurring between cortical parenchyma and sclerenchyma but also between sclerenchyma and vascular bundle (phloem/xylem). – a–b. H.B. 9701 (DE-HS, Darmstadt).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is tmyc-5-228-g021.jpg

Known records of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus in Eastern Asia.

When Arendholz (1979, p. 79) studied three duplicates of the two exsiccata (n° 2004 in K and PC, n° 1604 in K), he stated that n° 2004 is the ‘type’, apparently following White’s lectotypification. Also Carpenter (1981, p. 187) examined the two exsiccata in PC (one erroneously citing as n° 2005). By overlooking White’s lectotypification and unaware of Arendholz’ study, he designated n° 1604 (PC) as lectotype.

When erecting the new species Hy. pseudoalbidus, Queloz et al. (2011, p. 141) examined those two duplicates of Hy. albidus deposited in GENT. Unaware of the previous designations, the authors designated n° 2004 in GENT as lectotype.

Of course, the two latter designations must be rejected. According to Laundon (1979), the personal herbarium of J.B.H.J. Desmazières (1786–1862) is deposited in PC. Although the Code recommends to select material as lectotype that was in the personal herbarium of the author (Recommendation 9A.4., ICBN), White’s selection of a duplicate in FH must be followed.

Desmazières’ (1850) two exsiccata appear to be part of a single collection. This can be concluded from the numbers in each of the two editions, which refer over a large range consecutively to the same taxa. Desmazières (1850, 1851) did not indicate date and location of the collection (except for ‘summer’). However, the handwritten label of Roberge’s specimen preserved at K bears the note ‘Caen’ [dépt. Calvados, France], the city where Roberge lived. Although no locality is mentioned for the type specimen, it seems probable that Roberge collected also this in the vicinity of Caen.

Husson et al. (2011) surprisingly reported more detailed specimen data: ‘collected by Roberge in 1850 from the Bois de Lébisey, close to Caen’. However, these data are actually an assumption which J.P. Rioult (director of the Départerment de Botanique, Mycologie et Biotechnologies, University of Caen) conveyed to the authors (C. Husson, personal communication) and also to us, reasoned from his personal experience about the most frequent origin of Roberge’s collections. Indeed, Roberge mostly collected in the parc de Lébisey, where he discovered his most important cryptogams (Morière 1866).

Misidentifications

Trustworthy records of Hy. albidus are actually not many. Quite a few were reported on leaves from hosts other than Fraxinus, such as Acer (Trail 1887, p. 173 [but inn Trail 1889, p. 63 changed to Fraxinus], FRDBI [Graddon, Spooner]), Aesculus (FRDBI [Crossland, Clark, Leedal]; Thind & Singh 1969; Thind et al. 1983; Sharma 1991), Betula (FRDBI [J.P. Blunt]), Corylus (FRDBI [Manvell, Shorten]), Eucalyptus (Beltrán Tejera et al. 2008), Filipendula (FRDBI [anon.]), Platanus (Feltgen 1903), Quercus (Massee & Crossland 1905, FRDBI [Hawley, Hunt]), Robinia (Roumeguère 1892), Rhododendron (FRDBI [Weir]), and Salix (Allescher 1898). These records probably belong to different species of Hymenoscyphus, or concern misidentified hosts.

Misidentified hosts reported for Hymenoscyphus Albidus

Declercq (personal communication) reported collections of Hy. albidus from Belgium on Juglans (unpreserved) and Pyrus (B.D. 94/108). However, re-examination of the latter collection revealed the host to be Fraxinus. Two unpreserved records included in our description of Hy. albidus were thought by the first author to be on Acer. Both showed asci without croziers and unquestionably concern Hy. albidus: in that from Luxembourg (24.IX.1990, ‘on blackened petiole of Acer pseudoplatanus’) druses of crystals were noted in the stipe, and in that from Tübingen (3.IX.1988, ‘on blackened primary veins of skeletonized leaf of ?Acer’) the spores contained large LBs. These notes on the presence of crystals or large LBs exclude Hy. vacini. Based on the general observation of a strict occurrence of Hy. albidus on Faxinus, we assume that the host was misidentified here.

Records on Fraxinus leaves misidentified as Hymenoscyphus albidus

Among the records on Fraxinus, possibly all those can be excluded in which the apothecia grew verifiably on unblackened parts of the rachises. Hy. albidus was actually confused in the years before ca. 1950 with Cyathicula fraxinophila (Svrček) Baral. According to Arendholz (1979, p. 80), almost all German records found in herbaria differ from British specimens in a textura oblita and represent at least partly a Cyathicula. Cy. fraxinophila resembles Hy. albidus in external view and is also confined to rachises (including petioles) of Fraxinus. Based on personal observations of the first author, this species deviates in a strongly gelatinized ectal excipulum (textura oblita) covered by rhomboid crystals, much narrower asci and spores, the former arising from croziers and with a more conical apex with an amyloid apical ring that resembles the Calycina-type, the latter homopolar and with a low lipid content that consists of minute LBs [spore size *(10–)14–18(–20) × (2.2–)2.5–2.8(–3) µm], also in multiguttulate paraphyses (VBs smaller and always globose), and particularly in the absence of a black stromatic tissue on the rachis and stipe base. The whitish apothecia also deviate in having a concave disc (0.6–1.2 mm diam.) with a finely crenulate margin.

Indeed, Rehm’s (1893, p. 797) description under the name He. albidum, with spores 15–18 × 3 µm with one oil drop at each end, undoubtedly refers to Cy. fraxinophila. Rehm mentioned the species from three localities: Bayern (Franken), Switzerland, and Südtirol; yet, he excluded the collection from Südtirol (leg. G. Bresadola) as deviating from the others, although he noticed here only the characteristic black stroma described by Desmazières. Rehm mentioned the Bresadola specimen also under Helotium virgultorum (p. 782), a lignicolous taxon which he described as growing on blackened wood surface, and he was sure that it belongs here. So only this specimen seems to represent true Hy. albidus.

Fautrey (in Roumeguère 1891, p. 124) described Phialea albida f. microspora Fautrey on ash rachises, with spores 10–12 × 2 µm, which again appears to concern Cy. fraxinophila. Also Schröter (1893, p. 74) reported under the name Hymenoscypha albida (Silesia, Oct.–Nov.) obviously Cy. fraxinophila (spores 13–18 × 2–3 µm, with homogeneous contents). Likewise Velenovský (1934, p. 205, pl. XX fig. 39) described and illustrated under the name He. albidum in fact Cy. fraxinophila (spores 12–18 × 2 µm, both ends obtuse and with granular content). Oddly enough, Velenovský confused Cy. fraxinophila and true Hy. albidus: only two of his four specimens preserved at PRM represent Cy. fraxinophila, according to their revision by Svrček (1985) and O. Koukol (personal communication). However, Svrček identified only one of these two (Mnichovice, XI.1933, PRM 147478) correctly (as Conchatium fraxinophilum), while he misidentified the other collection (Zvánovice, 24.X.1929, PRM 148804) as Hy. albidus, although also here the rachises were not blackened.

Without description, Le Gal (1938) reported He. albidum from Île-de-France (Villecresnes, Bois de la Grange et de l’Etoile) and stated the species to be very common in summer. It is possible that she was dealing in fact with Cy. fraxinophila. Grelet (1949, p. 35) mentioned this record, but his diagnosis is more or less a copy of Boudier’s, and it seems that Le Gal’s material has never been re-examined. Also Jaap’s (1910) report on Fraxinus rachises is without description; the stated association with Cy. coronata suggests that he was dealing with Cy. fraxinophila, a species which we found three times in association with Cy. coronata, whereas Hy. albidus grew always alone on the rachises. However, during survey in Czechia in 2013 Hy. fraxineus and Cy. fraxinophila were found sometimes on the same petiole (O. Koukol, personal communication). Also Gillet (1881) might have treated Cy. fraxinophila, because he did not mention a dark stroma.

This confusion includes also the leaf-inhabiting Hymenoscyphus caudatus (P. Karst.) Dennis. White (1944) stated that Hy. albidus is ‘known with certainty only from the material of Desmazières’, whereas he found all the many other European records under this name to be largely based upon specimens better referred to Hy. caudatus or He. scutula (Pers.) W. Phillips. This statement is in contradiction to Arendholz (1979), who mentioned only the genus Cyathicula as misidentification.

Records on leaves of Platanus and Aesculus misidentified as Hymenoscyphus Albidus

Feltgen (1903, p. 59) identified a collection from Luxembourg, on rotten leaves and petioles of Platanus orientalis, as Phialea albida. The small (0.2–0.5 mm diam.), yellowish, cyathiform apothecia and the narrow, obtusely fusoid spores (12–16 × 2–3.5 µm) might refer to a Cyathicula or Allophylaria. Apothecia could not be found by us in the preserved specimen (LUX 045915).Under the names He. robergei or Hymenoscyphus albidus, a taxon was reported on fallen petioles and leaf blades of Aesculus indica from the Northwestern Himalaya (India and Nepal), where it seems to be frequent (Thind & Singh 1969, p. 251, fig. 1; Thind et al. 1983, p. 278; Sharma 1976, p. 338, pl. 39 fig. 56, pl. 57 fig. 98, 1991, p. 123, pl. 4 fig. 56). Due to the similarity of Hy. albidus to both Hy. aesculi and Hy. honshuanus, which typically occur on Aesculus, this determination appears to be questionable and needs reinvestigation, particularly concerning the ascus base. The apothecia are described as cream to yellowish-brown when fresh, with a dark brown to black stipe base. Yet, the authors did not mention blackening of the substrate. Apart from the different substrate, Thind and Singh (1969, p. 253) noted that the Indian collections deviate from European Hy. albidus in narrower asci and ascospores, whereas Sharma (1976, p. 339) mentioned also ‘their more robust ascocarps’ and ‘longer ascospores’. However, the ascus and spore size given by Sharma [†(64–)75–95(–102) × 7–9.5(–11) µm, †15–22(–22.3) × 3–5 µm] fits all these species, and the fusoid-clavate spore shape would quite well match that of Hy. honshuanus. Those given by Thind and Singh are distinctly narrower (†85–100 × 7–7.5 µm, †16–20 × 3–3.5 µm) and the spores drawn rather cylindrical, which might better correspond to Hy. aesculi. However, Sharma’s remark that the apothecia become entirely dark brown to almost black on drying would fit the present observations on Hy. aesculi.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is tmyc-5-228-g005.jpg

Hymenoscyphus fraxineus. 5a. paraphysis containing VBs; 5b. freshly ejected ascospores containing LBs, 6c. do., from inside asci; 5d–e. ascus apices with euamyloid apical ring of the Hymenoscyphus-type; 5c, 6a–b. ascogenous hyphae with crozier formation (in 6a–b containing LBs). – Living state: 5a–c; dead state: 5d–e, 6a–c.

Hymenoscyphus fraxineus (T. Kowalski) Baral, Queloz & Hosoya, IMA Fungus 5(1): 80 (2014) – Figures 511

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is tmyc-5-228-g010.jpg

Hymenoscyphus fraxineus (Japan). a–g, u. Apothecia emerging from black pseudosclerotia in rachises of Fraxinus mandshurica (u: fresh; a–g: rehydrated); i–k. pseudosclerotium in cross section (i–j: several stromata in one rachis, delimited by black demarcation lines that occur in the xylem along radial rays and through the mark parenchyma); l. median section of stipe base (with black basal surface and internal crystals); m. surface view on ectal excipulum near margin (with yellow exudate); n–t, v–w. ascogenous hyphae with croziers. – Dead state (h–k, m in H2O; l in KOH; n–t KOH+CR; v–w in phloxine B). – Nagano: a, e, k. TNS-F-40074 (Sugadaira); b, g. TNS-F-12761 (ibid.); f, h. TNS-F-17817 (ibid.); v. TNS-F-12503 (Yuzawa); Hokkaido: c, m, s–t. TNS-F-52060 (Tomakomai); d, l, n–r, u. TNS-F-40043 (ibid.); i, j, w. TNS-F-52061 (Sapporo). – Phot. u: YJ Zhao.

  • Chalara fraxinea T. Kowalski, Forest Pathology 36, p. 265 (2006) [anamorph]

  • = Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus Queloz, Grünig, Berndt, T. Kowalski, T.N. Sieber & Holdenr., Forest Pathology 41, p. 140 (2010) [teleomorph]

Etymology

Fraxineus: after the substrate, rachises of Fraxinus; pseudoalbidus: because of the morphological similarity with Hy. albidus.

Holotype of anamorph

Poland, Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship, Włoszczowa, rachises of F. excelsior, 6.XII.2000, T. Kowalski (Z + ZT, HMIPC 17039, living culture CBS 122504; sq.: FJ597975; d.v.).

Holotype of teleomorph

Switzerland, Aargau, ENE of Lenzburg, E of Othmarsingen, rachises of F. excelsior, 22.VII.2009, V. Queloz (ZT 2022; sq.: GU586904; Figure 6).

Apothecia

Moist (0.7–)1–5(–8.5) mm diam., receptacle (0.25–)0.3–0.7(–1) mm thick (at margin 0.15–0.45 mm), non-translucent, round, sometimes irregularly lobate when large, non-gelatinous; disc whitish, medium concave to flat, finally slightly convex, margin distinct, not protruding, smooth, exterior and stipe concolorous, often with fine radial pale ochraceous fibres; stipe obconical, (0.6–)1–1.5(–2) mm long, 0.15–0.4(–0.5) mm thick at the very base 0.25–0.7 mm above, 0.4–1.2 mm below receptacle, base always externally blackened, forming a ring-like zone 90–300 µm high, sharply segregated from whitish stipe above (partly by a constriction), ± erumpent from sclerenchyma-phloem layer; receptacle turning rusty brown when bruised, dry light cream, senescent ochraceous to dark brown. Asci *(97–)110–130(–135) × (10–)10.5–12(–12.7) µm {5}, †(80–)90–110(–116) × ((8–))(8.5–)9–10(–11)((–12)) µm {4}, 8-spored, spores *obliquely biseriate, pars sporifera *40–54 µm long, living mature asci protruding 10–25 µm beyond paraphyses; apex (†) conico-truncate, dome *1–1.2 µm thick, †2–3 → 1.5–1.8 µm, apical ring occupying lower 1/3–9/10 of dome, strongly blue (bb) in IKI, Hymenoscyphus-type {13}; base arising from croziers {64}. Ascospores *((13.5–))(15–)16–21(–22)((–24.8)) × ((3.5–))(3.7–)4–4.5(–5)((–5.5)) µm {22}, †(15–)17–19(–21.5) × (3.5–)3.7–4(–4.3) µm {2}, slightly to strongly scutuloid, cylindrical or very slightly constricted in middle part, apex rounded to obtuse, with a slight to strong lateral protrusion, base medium to strongly attenuated, straight to slightly inequilateral or medium curved, especially at the apex, containing (1–)2–3 LBs [2–3.5(–4) µm diam.] and many small ones in each half {>26}, lipid content 4.5–5, LBs fusing to one large globose drop in each half when rehydrated and still alive; sometimes a very delicate sheath was seen that slips off the spore, without setulae; overmature spores †16–21 × 4–5.7 µm {1}, 1(–2)-septate {3}, hyaline or with a smooth to rough, pale to light olivaceous-brown wall {2}. Paraphyses apically uninflated, terminal cell *(47–)50–70(–85) × (3–)3–4.5(–5) µm {2}, lower cells *(7–)10–20(–25) × (2.3–)2.5–3.5(–4) µm {2}; rarely to frequently branched at septa, anastomosing in lower part. Medullary excipulum hyaline, of a ± dense textura intricata, individual cells *(25–)28–50(–75) × 6–10(–15) µm {2}, covered by thin gel, indistinctly delimited from ectal excipulum by an up to ~100 µm thick layer of textura porrecta, in stipe sharply delimited. Ectal excipulum hyaline, at flanks of (*) very slightly († slightly) gelatinized textura prismatica(-porrecta), 40–80 µm thick, cells *(12–)20–50(–70) × (6–)9–20(–30) µm {5}, oriented at a (0–)10–30(–40)° angle to the surface; 10–20 µm thick at margin, oriented at 0–10°; in stipe 25–35 µm thick, of (†) slightly to medium gelatinized t. prismatica-angularis(-globulosa) to t. prismatica-porrecta oriented at 0–10°, cells *(10–)15–28(–35) × (6–)8–14(–19) µm {4}; whole exterior of receptacle and stipe covered by a 10–15 µm thick layer of cortical hyphae forming a loose to dense network in surface view, individual cells *(10–)12–30(–40) × (2.5–)4–6(–8) µm, usually forming projecting or appressed, often irregularly flexuous or curled, hair-like protrusions *10–30(–70) × 3.5–5(–6) µm, 1–3(–4)-celled, especially near base of stipe. Crystals absent in complete tissue, except for medullary tissue in lower region of stipe at a length of ~100–400(–1000) µm, sparse to abundant, ±rhomboid, usually forming druses 10–30(–80) µm diam. VBs in paraphyses strongly refractive {>15}, hyaline, globose to angular (multiguttulate), later very elongate, occupying upper (32–)40–70(–75) µm; cortical hyphae and hairs on receptacle rarely or often containing globose, low- to medium-, sometimes high-refractive globose VBs. Exudate pale to bright yellowish-ochraceous, smooth to rough, covering cortical hyphae of entire receptacle and especially stipe. IKI: complete tissue inamyloid, VBs in paraphyses light to bright yellow- to red-brown; CRB: spore wall unstained, gel in ectal and medullary excipulum deep lilac, VBs in paraphyses slowly staining bright turquoise-blue.

Habitat

Aceri-Fraxinetum, Pruno-Fraxinetum, etc., on fallen previous year’s blackened rachises {51} or sometimes primary and secondary veins {4}, rarely on a 5.5 mm thick decorticated blackened twig {1}, of F. excelsior {53}, F. excelsior f. pendula {1}, F. mandshurica {9}, Fraxinus rhynchophylla {9}, lying on ground. Assoc.: Pyrenopeziza petiolaris {1}. Desiccation tolerance: intolerant for most elements (ascogenous hyphae survived a few hours on the dry slide), except for the ascospores, many of which were either viable after 6 months in the herbarium, or they were all dead after 4 months. Phenology: (V–)VI–IX. Altitude: 30–1600 m (Europe), 23–1325 m (E-Asia).

Specimens included

On rachises F. excelsior, if not otherwise stated, in Japan on rachises of F. mandshurica, in South Korea on rachises of F. rhynchophylla or F. mandshurica; list incomplete concerning records not examined by us.

Poland: Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship, Włoszczowa, 6.XII.2000 T. Kowalski (conidial isolate, holotype of Ch. fraxinea, in Z + ZT, living culture HMIPC 17039 in CBS 122504, sq.: FJ597975). – Lesser Poland Voivodeship, 18 km NNE of Kraków, 0.6 km S of Wesoła, 290 m, 24.VIII.2008, T. Kowalski (HMIPC 20.08, H.B. 9013; HMIPC 19.08, sq.: FJ597977). – Denmark: Sjaelland, S of Sorø, 4 km S of Frederiksberg, Suserup Skov, 30 m, 25.V.2007, H.O. Baral (H.B. 8509ø). – Belgium: Luxembourg, 2.7 km NNE of Arlon, NNE of Frassem, 368 m, 30.VI.2012, G. Marson (G.M. 2012–06-30 #1, d.v.). – Luxembourg: Oesling, 7 km W of Wiltz, Doncols, rue de village 31, 465 m, on rachises of F. excelsior f. pendula, 24.VIII.2012, M.T. Tholl (ø, d.v.). – Gutland, 5 km SW of Luxembourg, NE of Leudelange, Bois de Cessange, 290 m, 16.VI.2012, G. Marson (ø, d.v.). – Germany: Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Lübeck, SW of Rehna, 3 km ENE of Dechow, Staatsforst Rehna, S of forester’s lodge, 63 m, 17.VI.2007, T. Richter (H.B. 8551). – Nordrhein-Westfalen, 10 km NE of Gelsenkirchen, E of Herten, Waldfriedhof, 55 m, 27.VII.2011, F. Kasparek (ø, d.v.). – 6 km SE of Gescher, S of Kuhlenvenn, 75 m, 15.VIII.2011, K. Siepe (ø, n.v.). – Sachsen, 9 km ESE of Chemnitz, W of Erdmannsdorf, Edelmannsbachtal, 375 m, 23.VI.2010, B. Mühler (ø). – 4.5 km NE of Chemnitz, Zeisigwald, 330 m, 10.VII.2006, B. Mühler (H.B. 8220, sq.). – ibid., 370 m, 30.VIII.2011, B. Mühler (H.B. 9593). – Thüringen, 5 km ESE of Sonneberg, Föritz, Gasthof Steiner, 412 m, 18.VII.2011, I. Wagner (ø, d.v.). – 1.4 km NW of Föritz, 411 m, 14.VIII.2013, I. Wagner (ø, d.v.). – 2.3 km SSE of Sonneberg, E of Oberlind, Agroprodukt, 365 m, partly on veins, 8.VII.2011, I. Wagner (ø, d.v.). – 9 km NE of Gera, 2 km WNW of Köstritz, W of Gleina, 230 m, 24.VI.2011, I. Wagner (ø, d.v.). – Baden-Württemberg, 7 km E of Heidelberg, ESE of Ziegelhausen, Bärenbach, 195 m, 28.V.2011, M. Bemmann (ø). – ibid., 2.VI.2011, M. Bemmann (ø). – ibid., 23.VI.2011, M. Bemmann (M.B. 1/2011). – ibid., 175 m, 5.VII.2011, M. Bemmann (M.B. 3/2011). – 3.5 km ENE of Heidelberg, W of Ziegelhausen, Haarlaß, 114 m, 15.VII.2011, M. Bemmann (ø). – 3.5 km NE of Heidelberg, E of Handschuhsheim, Siebenmühlental, above Turnerbrunnen, 222 m, 2.VII.2011, M. Bemmann (M.B. 2/2011). – 3 km SE of Heidelberg, Boxberg, 280 m, 10.VII.2011, M. Bemmann (M.B. 04/2011). – 14.5 km ESE of Heidelberg, NW of Lobbach-Waldwimmersbach, 240 m, 23.VI.2012, M. Bemmann (ø). – 3.5 km E of Heidelberg, Königstuhl, Landesssternwarte, 572 m, 14.VII.2012, M. Bemmann (ø). – 7.5 km WNW of Speyer, 3 km SE of Böhl-Iggelheim, 116 m, 23.VII.2011, M. Bemmann (M.B. 05/2011). – 7 km SSW of Eberbach, ESE of Schönbrunn, Todtenbronnen, 362 m, 31.VII.2011, M. Bemmann (M.B. 06/2011). – 7.3 km NE of Karlsruhe, Füllbruch, 122 m, 5.VI.2011, D. Bandini (KR-M-0027298). – 6 km NE of Tübingen, E of Pfrondorf, Tiefenbach, 410 m, partly on veins, 17.VI.2011, H.O. Baral (ø). – ibid., 10.VII.2012 (H.B. 9700ø). – ibid., 29.VIII.2012 (H.B. 9721ø). – ibid., 385 m, 31.VII.2011 (H.B. 9583). – ibid., partly on veins, 24.IX.2011 (H.B. 9602ø). – ibid., 2.VII.2012 (H.B. 9698ø). – ibid., 27.VIII.2013 (H.B. 9836ø). – S of Pfrondorf, Haldenbach, 385 m, 7.IX.2011, H.O. Baral (H.B. 9596ø). – 1.7 km N of Pfrondorf, Zeitungseiche, 460 m, 9.IX.2011, H.O. Baral (H.B. 9599ø). – Reutlingen, Lederstraße, Echaz, 390 m, 25.VI.2011, H.O. Baral (H.B. 9560ø). – Bayern, 0.5 km SSE of Amberg, Vils, 370 m, 17.VIII.2011, H.O. Baral (H.B. 9589ø). – 1 km W of Hirschau, Moosweiher, 415 m, 19.VIII.2011, H.O. Baral (H.B. 9588ø). – 10.5 km SW of Starnberg, 2 km NW of Tutzing, Deixlfurter See, 700 m, 13.VIII.2006, B. Fellmann (ø, #). – 21 km S of München, NW of Eulenschwang, 685 m, 19.VII.2011, B. Fellmann (ø). ― Austria , Niederösterreich, 8 km NW of Wiener Neustadt, SW of Wöllersdorf-Marchgraben, 380 m, 18.VII.2006, G. Koller (G.K., H.B. 9893ø). – Burgenland, 12 km SW of Mariazell, 1.5 km ESE of Dürradmer, 865 m, 30 VII.2006, G. Koller (G.K.). – Switzerland: Graubünden, 4.5 km ENE of Landquart, Crupspitz, 1120 m, 14.VIII.2014, H.O. Baral (H.B. 9907ø). – Solothurn, 1.7 km N of Solothurn, SE of Brüggemoos, Verenaschlucht, 510 m, 18.VII.2009, P. Zaffarano (ZT 3292, sq.: GU586911, 586912, 586913). – Jura, 1.1 km NW of Porrentruy, WNW of Waldegg, 508 m, 5.VII.2009, V. Queloz (ZT 3301, sq.: GU586907, 586908, 586909). – Fribourg, 8.2 km NNW of Payerne, NE of Chevroux, la Grande Cariçaie, 458 m, 27.V.2011, R. Dougoud & F. Ayer (ZT, ex R.D. 32.16.094.11, d.v.). – Bern, 5.5 km W of Burgdorf, NE of Hindelbank-Neufeld, Hurst, 530 m, 17.VII.2009, B. Senn-Irlet (ZT 3297, sq.: GU586906). – 3 km ESE of Belp, Leen, Belpau, 530 m, 18.VII.2009, B. Senn-Irlet (ZT 3298, sq. GU 586905). – Aargau, 4.5 km ENE of Lenzburg, E of Othmarsingen, 500 m, 22.VII.2009, V. Queloz (ZT 2022, holotype of Hy. pseudoalbidus, H.B. 9453ø, sq.: GU586904). – Zug, 3 km SSW of Unterägeri, E of Ochsenfeissi, Haslen, 835 m, 23.VI.2011, U. Graf (NMLU). – Luzern, 16 km NNW of Luzern, 3.3 km SW of Hitzkirch, Erlosen am Baldeggersee, Gmeinwald, 580 m, partly on a twig, 13.VII.2011, U. Graf (H.B. 9571). – 2 km NW of Luzern, SE of Emmenbrücke, at river Reuss, 435 m, 14.VII.2011 (H.B. 9572ø). – 2.8 km NE of Luzern, 0.4 km N of Dietschiberg, Hombrig, 585 m, 2.VII.2011, U. Graf (ø, n.v.). – France: Champagne-Ardenne, Haute-Marne, 50 km NNE of Dijon, E of Villiers-lès-Aprey, Fontaine aux Dames, 380 m, 17.VI.2012, A. Gardiennet (A.G. 12080, d.v.). – Japan: Hokkaido, 12 km WSW of Tomakomai-shi, Nishikionuma Park, 23 m, 12.IX.2011, Y.J. Zhao (TNS-F-40043, H.B. 9649ø, sq.: AB705219). – ~5 km N of Tomakomai-shi, Experimental Forest of Hokkaido University, VII.1990, T. Hosoya (TNS-F-52060, H.B. 9652ø). – 18.5 km WSW of Chitose-shi, Shikotsu lake, Hukkonomori, 240 m, 14.IX.2011, Y.J. Zhao (TNS-F-40051, H.B. 9650ø, sq.: AB705220). – 50 km ESE of Sapporo, ~15 km S of Yubari-shi, Taki-no-ue Park, ~200 m, VII.1990, T. Hosoya (TNS-F-52061, H.B. 9657ø). – Honshu, Nagano, Chiisagata-gun, Sanada-machi, 16.5 km NE of Ueda, SE of Sugadaira, Sugadaira Montane Center, Arboretum, 1325 m, VIII.1992, T. Hosoya (TNS-F-52062, H.B. 9651ø). – ibid., 7.IX.2005, T. Shirouzu (TNS-F-17817, H.B. 9734ø, sq.: AB705224). – ibid., 11.IX.2006, T. Hosoya (TNS-F-12761, H.B. 9659ø, sq.: AB705218). – ibid., 28.IX.2011, Y.J. Zhao (TNS-F-40074, H.B. 9658ø, sq.). – 43 km SE of Joetsu, 20 km WSW of Yuzawa (Niigata), Daimyojin, 990 m, 10.IX.2006, T. Hosoya (TNS-F-12503, d.v., sq.: AB705221). – South Korea: 26 km NNW of Pyeongchang, 28 km ENE of Hoengseong, Mt. Taegi, 1043 m, rachises of F. rhynchophylla, 14.VIII.2008, J.G. Han (KUS-F52255, d.v., sq.: KF830850). – 9 km WNW of Pyeongchang, 29 KM ESE of Hoengseong, Supchaewon, 1100 m, veins of F. mandshurica, 23.IX.2008, J.G. Han (KUS-F52355, d.v., sq.: KF830851). – Further eight records made on F. rhynchophylla during 2007–2010, 14.VII.–27.VIII. – Russia (far east): Primorsky, 30 km E of Wladiwostok, 2.7 km E of Primosrky, Kedrovaya Pad, 60 m, rachises of F. mandshurica, 17.VIII.2005, E. Popov (LE 294377, n.v.). – China: Jilin, 64 km E of Jilin, 8 km N of Jiaohe, Lafashan,, 290 m, rachises of F. mandshurica, 22.VII.2012, T. Bau, W.Y. Zhuang, H.D. Zheng, Z.Q. Zeng, Z.X. Zhu & F. Ren (HMAS 264152, n.v.). – 93 km ENE of Jilin, 39 km NE of Jiaohe, Qianjin, 395 m, rachises and veins of F. mandshurica, 23./24.VII.2012, T. Bau et al. (HMAS 264174, 266596, 266580, 266581, d.v.). – 225 km SE of Jilin, 34 km S of Dunha, 15 km NNE of Changbaishan, 1310 m, rachises of F. mandshurica, 27.VII.2012, T. Bau et al. (HMAS 266582, 266583, n.v.) [coordinates and altitude in Zheng and Zhuang (2014) incorrect for two sites].

Characterization

Hy. fraxineus differs from Hy. albidus mainly in the presence of croziers. Further features comprise a tendency to apothecia larger (up to 8 mm diam.), larger pseudosclerotia (often occupying the almost entire rachis), slightly larger ascospores, an earlier start of fructification, and the presence of an anamorph in pure culture.

History about the detection of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus

Judging from the list of specimens examined by Queloz et al. (2011), Hy. fraxineus was genetically recorded in Europe since 2000, with two exceptions dating back to 1978 and 1987 which later turned out to concern Hy. albidus (see below). Although the ash dieback disease was first observed in Northern Poland in 1992, the oldest isolate of the anamorph state dates from 6.XII.2000, which represents the type culture of Ch. fraxinea (Kowalski 2006). Apothecia of Hy. fraxineus were first discovered in 2006 and 2007 in Germany (Sachsen and Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, see Table 2), in 2008 in Poland (Kowalski & Holdenrieder 2009), and from June 2009 onwards in Switzerland by Queloz et al. (2011). Since then, Hy. fraxineus became an extremely frequent species that shows mass fructifications throughout Central Europe every year, forming 370.000 up to 13.350.000 apothecia per hectare at a time (Kowalski et al. 2013), and totally replacing Hy. albidus in these regions. During invasion of Switzerland, Hy. fraxineus did not surpass an altitude of 850 m while Hy. albidus was still present at higher altitudes (up to 1690 m), according to data in Queloz et al. (2011). However, there is evidence that both species exhibit a similar tolerance to low temperatures. Apothecia of Hy. fraxineus were presently recorded in the Alps at 1410 m and in Japan at 1325 m as a maximum, and disease symptoms were seen in the Alps up to 1600 m.

Table 2.

Records of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus for which the ascus base was tested {73} and partly also the ITS sequence obtained {16}.

VoucherLocationalt.cr.Testps.DNAdiam.coll. date
HMIPC 20.08, H.B.9013PL-Kraków, Wesoła290+1mfrx.1–2.524.VIII.2008
BILAS 25151LT-Kėdainiai, Kėdainiai63+1am~1–43.IX.2001
BILAS 33994LT-Kėdainiai, Kėdainiai50+2am~1–43.X.2002
BILAS 34422LT-Kėdainiai, Kėdainiai58+1am~1–421.IX.1999
BILAS 34425LT-Kėdainiai, Kėdainiai63+1am~1–42.X.2002
BILAS 34426LT-Kėdainiai, Kėdainiai52+1am~1–421.IX.1999
WI 4714LT-Vilnius, Vilnius130+1am~1–425.VI.2001
H.B. 8509øDK-Sjaelland, Suserup30+1a 25.V.2007
G.M. 2012–06-30 #1BE-WLX Arlon, Frassem368+1bi/m1–830.VI.2012
øLU-Doncols465+1c 3–524.VIII.2012
øLU-Leudelange290+1b 0.5–516.VI.2012
H.B. 8551DE-MV Rehna, Dechow63+1m1.5–517.VI.2007
øDE-NW Gelsenkirchen, Herten55+1dm27.VII.2011
øDE-NW Gescher75+1e 2–415.VIII.2011
øDE-SN Chemnitz, Erdmannsdorf375+1m23.VI.2010
H.B. 8220DE-SN Chemnitz, Zeisigwald330+2m.frx.1–510.VII.2006
H.B. 9593DE-SN Chemnitz, Zeisigwald370+2m2–630.VIII.2011
øDE-TH Köstritz, Gleina230+~1fm24.VI.2011
øDE-TH Sonneberg, Unterlind350+~1fm8.VII.2011
øDE-TH Sonneberg, Föritz412+~4fm18.VII.2011
øDE-TH Sonneberg, Föritz411+~1fm0.8–514.VIII.2013
KR-M-0027298DE-BW Karlsruhe, Füllbruch120+1i_5.VI.2011
øDE-BW Heidelberg, Bärenbach195+1m28.V.2011
øDE-BW Heidelberg, Bärenbach195+1m2–52.VI.2011
M.B. 1/2011DE-BW Heidelberg, Bärenbach195+3m1–423.VI.2011
M.B. 3/2011DE-BW Heidelberg, Bärenbach175+1m2–7.55.VII.2011
øDE-BW Heidelberg, Haarlaß114+1m1–515.VII.2011
M.B. 2/2011DE-BW Heidelberg, Handschuhsh.222+2m1.5–52.VII.2011
M.B. 04/2011DE-BW Heidelberg, Boxberg280+1m1.5–4.510.VII.2011
M.B. 05/2011DE-BW Speyer, Böhl-Iggelheim116+1m2–6.623.VII.2011
M.B. 06/2011DE-BW Eberbach362+2i/m2–8.531.VII.2011
øDE-BW Heidelberg, Lobbach240+1m1–4.523.VI.2012
øDE-BW Heidelberg, Königstuhl572+1 –714.VII.2012
øDE-BW Tübingen, Tiefenbach410+2i/m0.7–1.817.VI.2011
H.B. 9700øDE-BW Tübingen, Tiefenbach410+4i/m1–6.510.VII.2012
H.B. 9721øDE-BW Tübingen, Tiefenbach410+1i/m0.7–229.VIII.2012
H.B. 9583DE-BW Tübingen, Tiefenbach385+3m1.3–5.531.VII.2011
H.B. 9602øDE-BW Tübingen, Tiefenbach385+2i/m0.4–1.624.IX.2011
H.B. 9698øDE-BW Tübingen, Tiefenbach380+3m1–82.VII.2012
H.B. 9836øDE-BW Tübingen, Tiefenbach380+1m1–4.527.VIII.2013
H.B. 9596øDE-BW Tübingen, Haldenbach385+4i/m1–1.57.IX.2011
H.B. 9599øDE-BW Tübingen, Zeitungseiche460+1 1–1.59.IX.2011
H.B. 9560øDE-BW Reutlingen390+2m1–325.VI.2011
H.B. 9589øDE-BY Amberg370+1 1.5–1.717.VIII.2011
H.B. 9588DE-BY Hirschau415+3 1–319.VIII.2011
øDE-BY München, Eulenschwang685+3m0.8–4.219.VII.2011
G.K., H.B. 9893øAT-NÖ W.-Neustadt, Wöllersdorf380+1m1.5–318.VII.2006
G.K.AT-BL Mariazell, Dürradmer865+1m1.5–330.VII.2006
H.B. 9907øCH-GB Landquart1120+1m1–214.VIII.2014
ZT 3292CH-SO Brüggemoos510+2 frx.1–2.518.VII.2009
ZT 3301CH-JU Porrentruy508+1mfrx.1–45.VII.2009
ZT (R.D. 32.16.094.11ø)CH-FR Payerne458+1g 27.V.2011
ZT 3297CH-BE Burgdorf530+2 frx.2–417.VII.2009
ZT 3298CH-BE Belp530+2 frx.1.5–4.518.VII.2009
ZT 2022 type, H.B.9453øCH-AG Lenzburg500+2mfrx.1–5.522.VII.2009
NMLUCH-ZG Unterägeri835+1h 23.VI.2011
H.B. 9571CH-LU Hitzkirch580+3m3–613.VII.2011
H.B. 9572øCH-LU Emmenbrücke435+2 2–714.VII.2011
øCH-LU Dietschiberg585+1 2.VII.2011
øFR-CA Dijon380+1im17.VI.2012
HMAS 264174CN-Jilin Qianjin395+1 lmfrx.0.8–223.VII.2012
LE 294377RU-Wladiwostok, Primorsky60+1 m 17.VIII.2005
TNS-F-40043, H.B.9649øJP-Hokkaido, Tomakomai-shi23+1mfrx.1–412.IX.2011
TNS-F-52060, H.B.9652øJP-Hokkaido, Tomakomai-shi23+1(m)0.9VII.1990
TNS-F-40051, H.B.9650øJP-Hokkaido, Chitose-shi240+1(m)frx.1.5–2.214.IX.2011
TNS-F-52061, H.B.9657øJP-Hokkaido, Yubari-shi~200+1/1ji1VII.1990
TNS-F-52062, H.B.9651øJP-Nagano, Sugadaira1325+1i/m0.8–1.8VIII.1992
TNS-F-17817, H.B.9734øJP-Nagano, Sugadaira1325+1mfrx.1–2.77.IX.2005
TNS-F-12761, H.B.9659øJP-Nagano, Sugadaira1325+1i/mfrx.1.1–2.311.IX.2006
TNS-F-40074, H.B.9658øJP-Nagano, Sugadaira1325+1i/mfrx.0.5–2.328.IX.2011
TNS-F-12503JP-Nagano, Yuzawa990+1j frx.10.IX.2006
KOH-F-52255KR-Pyeongchang, Mt. Taegi1043+1k frx.?–214.VIII.2008
KUS-F-52355KR-Pyeongchang, Supchaewon1100?mfrx.?–223.IX.2008

Notes: Explanation: alt. = altitude [m]; cr. = croziers; test = number of apothecia tested for croziers, examined by aE. Kutorga, bG. Marson, cM.T. Tholl,dF. Kasparek, eK. Siepe, fI. Wagner, gR. Dougoud, hU. Graf, iA. Gardiennet, jZhao et al. (2013), kJ.G. Han, l Zheng and Zhuang (2014), m E. Popov; ps. = pseudosclerotium (i = isolated patches, m = major part of rachis or vein blackened); DNA = molecular identification (frx. = identified as Hy. fraxineus [Hy. pseudoalbidus] by Queloz et al. 2011 [PL, CH], Zhao et al. 2013 [JP], or J.G. Han [KR]; frx.+ = confirmed as Hy. fraxineus by V. Queloz personal communication); diam. = apothecial diameter in fresh state [mm].

When randomly checking fresh collections of Hy. albidus (sensu lato), the first author observed differences in ascus development among the studied samples: apothecia found during 1988–1991 in the south of Germany (Tübingen) and in Liechtenstein possessed asci arising from simple septa, whereas in those found during 2006–2010 in Sachsen (Chemnitz), Mecklenburg (Rehna), and Denmark (Sjælland) the asci consistently arose from croziers. Because there were no other deviating features to be found in the 2006–2010 specimens, the observed deviation was first thought to represent variation within a single species. When ash disease invaded Europe and the Hy. albidus sexual state was identified as the causal agent, the first author became suspicious that the two variants of Hy. albidus that he had observed, with differing types of ascus development, were the two ‘cryptic’ species reported by molecular methods.

In the present study, 13 sequenced specimens from ZT and 1 from HMIPC, which were identified by Queloz et al. (2011) based on their rDNA sequences, were re-examined for the ascus base. Further four specimens were sent to V. Queloz by the first author to be sequenced. The result confirms the above hypothesis: Hy. fraxineus can be distinguished from Hy. albidus by the presence of croziers: six out of seven collections identified by molecular methods as Hy. pseudoalbidus (=Hy. fraxineus) turned out to have croziers, whereas seven collections identified as Hy. albidus were found to have simple-septate ascus bases (Tables 1 and and2,2, HMIPC, ZT).

Table 1.

Records of Hymenoscyphus albidus for which the ascus base was tested {29} and partly also the ITS sequence obtained {12}.

VoucherLocationalt.cr.testps.DNAdiam.coll. date
S.Å.H. 15290S-Skåne, Helsingborg421a 24.VIII.1994
B.D. 94/092BE-VOV Sinaai51b 0.8–3.516.VII.1994
B.D. 94/108, H.B. 9847BE-VOV Brugge21m1–1.524.VIII.1994
B.D. 89/076BE-WLX Virton2501b 1–2.513.VIII.1989
LUX 047702, H.B. 9611øBE-WLX Orval~2001m~0.7–1.5~5.IX.1990
S.H. 444, H.B. 9854NL-GL Nijmegen81/1ci1–1.87.VII.2007
LUX 047701, H.B. 9612øLU-Echternach~2001i/m14.VII.1985
H.B. øLU-Mertert (on ‘Acer’)1551 24.IX.1990
LUX 047699, H.B. 9619øLU-Kehlen3701i~0.7–217.VII.1988
LUX 047700, H.B. 9620øLU-Manternach~2002i/m~0.7–215.VIII.1985
H.B. 3841DE-RP Pirmasens2802i/malb.+0.8–2.7~3.IX.1989
H.B. øDE-BW Tübingen4001 14.IX.1991
H.B. 1950DE-BW Stockach5502i/malb.+0.9–1.820.VIII.1976
H.B. 5834LI-Bendern4452i/malb.+1.5–45.VII.1997
ZT (R.D. 32.28.094.11ø)CH-FR Boulogne8202d 14.VIII.2011
ZT (R.D. 32.29.094.11ø)CH-FR Mothey8001d 14.VIII.2011
ZT 3300CH-BE Eymatt5082 alb.1–2.55.VIII.2009
ZT 3299CH-BE Eymatt5302 alb.1–25.VIII.2009
ZT, H.B. 9454øCH-LU Aesch5302i/malb.†1–2.54.IX.1978
ZT (ex NMLU)CH-ZG Unterägeri8301 alb.1–221.VII.2007
ZT 3296CH-TI Quinto9902 alb.1–1.526.VII.2009
ZT 3295CH-TI Aquarossa5971 alb.1–228.VII.2009
ZT 3294CH-TI Lavorgo6161 alb.1–1.727.VII.2009
Desm. 1604, 2004 (type)FR-BN Caen652ei/malb.*1–2summer ca. 1850
ZT 3293, R.D. 22.11.094.95øFR-BN Bellême1901 alb.0.8–2.528.IX.1995
M.H. 220607øFR-PC Niort, Granzay251f(i)/m16.VI.2007
H.B. 9699, M.H. 10712FR-PC Niort, Granzay251i/m1.3–3.82.VII.2012
ARAN-Fungi 000082ES-VA Gipuzkoa, Aia2951gi/m1–325.VII.2014
M.B. 10/2014ES-VA Atxondogoikoa6001m1–318.VIII.2014

Notes: Explanations: alt. = altitude [m]; cr. = croziers; test = number of apothecia tested for croziers, examined by aS.Å. Hanson & T. Laessøe, bB. Declercq, cS. Helleman, dR. Dougoud, eWhite (1944), fM. Hairaud, gI. Olariaga; ps. = pseudosclerotium (i = isolated patches, m = major part of rachis blackened); DNA = molecular identification: alb. = identified as Hy. albidus by Queloz et al. (2011); alb.+ = confirmed as Hy. albidus by V. Queloz (personal communication); alb* = sequenced by Husson et al. (2011); alb.† = at first misidentified as Hy. pseudoalbidus by Queloz et al. (2011), but later resequenced and corrected in GenBank by Queloz et al. (2012); diam. = apothecial diameter in fresh state [mm].

However, the result for one of those specimens identified by molecular data as Hy. pseudoalbidus (Luzern, Aesch, collected in 1978, NMLU 0409–78) behaved contradictory: the asci were found to be simple-septate. Since also the year of collection argues against Hy. fraxineus, the sequence taken from this sample was thought to originate from DNA of another specimen. The same suspicion arose concerning a collection made in 1987 (Zürich, Sihlwald, ZT 87–236) which has not been re-examined for croziers. Due to their age, the asserted identity of these two samples confused also other workers, e.g., Husson et al. (2011). Because of this and the observed discrepancy concerning the ascus base in the specimen from Aesch, both were resequenced for ITS and calmodulin by V. Queloz in 2012 and, indeed, turned out to represent Hy. albidus (Queloz et al. 2012). Their sequences were subsequently replaced in GenBank, and their identity corrected.

Different theories have been proposed concerning the origin of the causal agent of ash dieback in Europe. These include a virulent mutant, either of the native Hy. albidus (Kowalski and Holdenrieder 2009, p. 307) or of the introduced Hy. fraxineus (Queloz et al. 2011, p. 141), but even the invasion of Hy. fraxineus from outside Europe without associated mutation (Queloz et al. 2011, p. 141). The latter authors and Bengtsson et al. (2012) were the first who assumed an Asian origin for the pathogen. When searching for reports from outside Europe, the only reliable record on Fraxinus rachises that came to our notice was that from Japan by Hosoya et al. (1993), who reported the species under the name Lambertellinia albida, with three specimens on rachises of Fraxinus mandshurica var. japonica collected during 1990–1992 in Hokkaido and Nagano Prefectures. Re-examination of five specimens from the same prefectures collected during 2005–2011, kindly supplied by T. Hosoya and referred to Hy. fraxineus (as Hy. pseudoalbidus) by Zhao et al. (2013) based on their DNA sequence data, proved indeed to have asci arising from croziers (Table 2, TNS-F; see also Zhao et al. 2013, fig. 4). Likewise, several specimens on rachises of F. rhynchophylla and F. mandshurica from South Korea showed croziers at the ascus base, and a sequence that sits in the Hy. fraxineus clade (Table 2, KUS, J.G. Han personal communication).

These results, which suggest an Eastern Asian origin of the European ash dieback disease, underline the importance of detailed morphological studies in combination with molecular work. In the present case this concerns an unequivocal character state of the ascus base within the genus Hymenoscyphus, which is either + or – , though the elucidation of this character requires a certain skill and mounting technique. The species complex Hy. albidus/Hy. fraxineus represents one of many examples of subtle, currently neglected microscopic differences between closely related species within the ascomycetes. The present example is extraordinary because of the great economic importance of one of the two involved species.

The first report of dieback of young shoots of ash within Europe concerns regions in Northwestern Poland and dates from the year 1992 (Kowalski & Czekaj 2010). Other countries announced the disease in subsequent years (see, e.g., Timmermann et al. 2011, fig. 1; Husson et al. 2011). During the past decades Hy. albidus s.l. was not continuously collected and examined by the first author under the microscope, for two reasons: (1) the taxon was apparently not frequent at that time and (2) prior to the first record of croziers in 2006 it seemed to be a species that is already macroscopically well characterized by its occurrence on blackened rachises of ash. Hence, herbarium specimens were rarely kept, and a gapless elucidation of the first appearance of croziers in the ascocarps of this species aggregate cannot be accomplished.

Molecular studies performed on the two taxa by various authors strongly suggest that the causal agent of the disease is always Hy. fraxineus, never Hy. albidus. Our comprehensive microscopic examination of specimens collected since 2011 in Central Europe revealed exclusively apothecia in which the asci arise from croziers. Together with the consistent occurrence under trees that showed severe symptoms of the disease, it can be concluded that all these records represent Hy. fraxineus. In colline regions of Central Europe, this species starts fruiting already in May–June, distinctly earlier than Hy. albidus which started fruiting in July in that region. Undoubtedly, Hy. fraxineus has totally replaced Hy. albidus there, perhaps due to its high pathogenicity to the European ash and the advantage of early fruiting.

Earlier reports of ash dieback

The term ‘ash dieback’ is not a recent construct that emerged with the appearance of the disease caused by Ch. fraxinea and thus named in French more precisely ‘Chalarose du Frêne’. There were other events before with similar features as dieback of young shoots in the crown of the trees but with different causes. In the 1960s and 1970s such occurrences were reported from the US (Croxton 1966; Hibben and Silverborg 1978) and in the 1980s (Pawsey 1983) and even in the late 1990s (Wiltshire et al. 1996) from England. But they were ascribed to climatical conditions rather than to fungal infections.

Nomenclature

According to the new nomenclatural rules (Art. 59, ICN Melbourne, McNeill et al. 2012), the name Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus needs to be changed, because the specific epithet of Ch. fraxinea T. Kowalski 2006 is older than that of Hy. pseudoalbidus Queloz et al. 2011, while the generic name Hymenoscyphus Gray 1821 predates that of Chalara (Corda) Rabenh. 1844. Gams et al. (2012, p. 495) recommended to generally accept the epithet which is in the prioritized genus: ‘When a binomial in a prioritized genus has a younger epithet than the corresponding name in the suppressed genus, only priority of extant names in the prioritized genus should count.’ However, this proposal was later not accepted. Since molecular data on Hy. albidus and Hy. pseudoalbidus support that these species are closely related to the type species of Hymenoscyphus (Queloz et al. 2011), and because Ch. fraxinea yielded in online search engines about 5 times as many hits as Hy. pseudoalbidus (52.200 vs. 10.100, Google Web Search, 22.V.2014), Baral et al. (2014) proposed the new combination Hymenoscyphus fraxineus.

Molecular studies have shown that the genus Chalara in its large sense concerns anamorphs of very different ascomycetes (Cai et al. 2009): most of the investigated species were found to belong in the Helotiales, but a few are closely related to Xylariales. Species of Chalara s.l. connected to Ceratocystis Ellis & Halst. (Microascales) were transferred to the genus Thielaviopsis Went already by Paulin-Mahady et al. (2002).

The type species of Chalara, Ch. fusidioides (Corda) Rabenh., was originally described from Czechia on bark of Pinus, but later records were made on very different substrates such as Fragaria (leaves), Podocarpus, Vitis, and Mycosphaerella (perithecia), according to a redescription by Nag Raj and Kendrick (1975, p. 119, fig. 30F), who presented an illustration of the holotype. A single sequence under the name Ch. fusidioides exists in GenBank (18S rDNA, from Picea, no source given). When best-matched sequences are searched using BLAST in GenBank (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi), only helotialean taxa are yielded, for instance members of the genera Hyaloscypha Boud. or Bulgaria Fr. but no true Hymenoscyphus under the first 100 hits. In the phylogenetic analysis by Réblová et al. (2011), Ch. fusidioides clusters in a clade with Calycina citrina (as Bisporella citrina). Whether this Chalara strain was correctly identified remains uncertain, as no morphological documentation was available to us. Within the relationship of Calycina, chalara-like anamorphs are known, e.g., in Calycina claroflava (Grev.) Baral et al. (Johnston 1988, as Bisporella discedens, anamorph Bloxamia Berk. & Broome), Calycellina ulmariae (Lasch) Korf (Baral 1989, pl. 1 fig. I, anamorph Chalara aff. fusidioides), Calycellina carolinensis Nag Raj & W.B. Kendr. (Nag Raj & Kendrick 1975, anamorph Chaetochalara aspera Piroz. & Hodges) and Phaeoscypha cladii (Nag Raj & W.B. Kendr.) Spooner (Nag Raj & Kendrick 1975, as Hyaloscypha cladii, anamorph Chaetochalara cladii B. Sutton & Piroz.).

Since the identity of type material of old teleomorph names is often easier to settle compared to anamorph names on the basis of a morphological reinvestigation, teleomorph genera should be given preference in regard to nomenclatural priority in those groups where teleomorphs exhibit clearer specific characteristics than anamorphs. As a consequence, we here consider Chalara as a form genus of anamorphs. Although the type of Chalara resembles Ch. fraxinea morphologically, the presently available molecular data do not support a close relationship with a phylogenetic group presented in an analysis in Baral et al. (2013), which can be taken as a representation of the family Helotiaceae in a restricted sense, comprising the genera Hymenoscyphus, Phaeohelotium Kanouse, Cudoniella Sacc., and Cyathicula De Not.

Hymenoscyphus honshuanus Baral, nom. nov.Figure 12 – MycoBank MB 809090

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is tmyc-5-228-g011.jpg

Hymenoscyphus honshuanus (holotype of Lambertellinia scutuloides): a. ascospores (partly from inside asci, containing LBs); b. ascogenous hyphae with crozier formation; c. median section of receptacle; d. apothecium; e–f. ascus apices with euamyloid apical ring (Hymenoscyphus-type); g. ectal excipulum at flanks (median section), with gelatinized walls. – All in dead state.

  • Basionym: Lambertellinia scutuloides Korf & Lizoň, Mycotaxon 50, p. 168 (1994) [non Hymenoscyphus scutuloides Hengstm., Persoonia 16, p. 199 (1996)]

  • Lambertellinia scutuloides Korf & Lizoň, Inoculum, Newsletter of the Mycological Society of America 44(2), p. 43 (1993); nom. inval., Art. 39.1 (Melbourne)

Etymology

Honshuanus: named after the geographical origin; scutuloides: according to the scutuloid ascospores.

Holotype

Japan, Honshu, Yamagata, Oguni-machi, Tsugawa, petioles of Aesculus turbinata, 28.VIII.1961, D. Shimizu (CUP-JA 2252; Figure 12).

Apothecia

Rehydrated ~2–3 mm diam., disc light orange- to golden-yellow, concave to flat, exterior pale yellow; stipe 1–4 × 0.2–1 mm, concolorous with receptacle, sometimes brownish at the base, usually with a black ring of stromatal tissue at the base; dry entirely ochraceous. Asci †85–94 × 8.5–9 µm, 8-spored, spores †biseriate or irregularly uniseriate; apex (†) conical, dome †1.7 → 1 µm thick, apical ring occupying the lower 2/3 of dome, strongly blue in IKI (bb), Hymenoscyphus-type; base arising from croziers {two apothecia tested}. Ascospores †15–20.3 × 3.8–5(–5.4) µm, mostly distinctly scutuloid, cylindric–fusoid, apex obtuse, with a slight to strong lateral protrusion, base medium attenuated, often subacute, straight to slightly inequilateral or curved, containing ~2–3(–5) medium- to large-sized LBs (1.3–)1.7–3 µm diam. and many small ones in each half, lipid content 4.5–5; sheath not observed, setulae absent; spore wall (probably overmature) partly turning pale to light ochre-brown with age, remaining smooth, occasionally 1-septate. Paraphyses apically uninflated, †2–2.8 µm wide. Ectal excipulum hyaline, at lower flanks of textura porrecta oriented at a low angle to the surface, cells broadly brick-shaped, †~60–75 × 5–10 µm, with seemingly strongly gelatinized walls (but in KOH only slightly so), externally covered by narrow, straw- to golden-yellow hyphae. Anamorph: unknown.

Habitat

On blackened, previous year’s petioles of Aesculus turbinata {1}. Desiccation tolerance: unknown. Altitude: ‘500–800 m’.

Characterization

Hy. honshuanus is not easily separable from Hy. fraxineus by its micromorphology, but the deviating substrate and the apothecia with a yellowish disc and longer stipes appear to be diagnostic. As already mentioned, the only difference between Hy. honshuanus and Hy. fraxineus worth mentioning seems to be the longer apothecial stipe and a more yellowish disc in the former species, apart from the deviating substrate. The excipular cells are a bit longer and narrower than in Hy. fraxineus. The lower width is to some extent due to the shrinking effect in the dead state, however. Moreover, the width of the ectal excipular cells in Hy. fraxineus varies rather strongly. Regrettably, a section of the blackened petioles and the stipe base of Hy. honshuanus was not studied, neither by Korf and Lizoň nor in the present study; therefore, the occurrence of a demarcation line beneath the sclerenchyma as seen in Hy. aesculi remains unclear, and also the presence of crystals in the stipe base, being characteristic of Hy. fraxineus and Hy. albidus, remains to be examined.

Nomenclature

Hy. honshuanus was originally described by Korf and Lizoň (1994) under the name Lambertellinia scutuloides from Japan on blackened petioles of Aesculus turbinata and is known with certainty only from the type collection. A transfer of Lambertellinia scutuloides to Hymenoscyphus is blocked by the different caulicolous taxon Hy. scutuloides Hengstm.; therefore, a new name is here proposed. The species was presented already by Korf and Lizoň (1993) on a poster at the Annual Meeting of the Mycological Society of America, with reference to an earlier volume of Mycotaxon (47, 1993), but it did not actually appear there.

Type study and circumscription

According to the present redescription of the holotype, which was briefly mentioned also in Galán and Baral (1997), the taxon deviates from H. aesculi and H. albidus in the presence of croziers and some other features (see also under those species). While the ascospores of H. aesculi lose their characteristic central swelling in the dead state, it is unknown whether living spores of H. honshuanus might also show such swelling.

Korf and Lizoň (1994) thought that Lambertellinia scutuloides resembles the genus Lambertella Höhn. in its black substratal stroma and the ascospores getting finally light brown, but the authors placed it in a new genus because of its long-celled excipular structure, the assumed connection to an Idriella anamorph, and probably also because of the deviating scutuloid spore shape, to which the original species epithet refers. Regrettably, no microscopic features were illustrated in the protologue, except for a photograph showing a section of the excipulum.

Korf and Lizoň believed that collections on leaves of Acer rubrum from North America and Berberis vulgaris from Germany are conspecific, though they examined only that on Berberis. The collection on Acer rubrum was treated by Kimbrough and Atkinson (1972) under the name Hymenoscyphus caudatus. Unlike Hy. fraxineus, a strain from this collection formed an Idriella anamorph in pure culture, with slightly falcate conidia measuring ?15 × 2 µm (evaluated from photos), formed in sporodochia in a sympoduloconidial type of development. The original material was not available to Korf and Lizoň, who were sure about its conspecificity with Lambertellinia scutuloides because of the reported brown colouration of the 1–2-septate ascospores when ‘mature’. However, Kimbrough and Atkinson did not observe stromatic tissues around the inhabited midribs and larger veins, although they saw the stipe base to arise from darkened host tissue. Regrettably, Kimbrough and Atkinson did not report the presence or absence of croziers, though they stated that the features of their fungus were essentially the same as in Hy. caudatus as described by White (1943) and others.

Korf and Lizoň (1994) characterized the ectal excipulum of Lambertellinia scutuloides as a hyaline textura porrecta consisting of gelatinized hyphae 3–6.5 µm wide, externally covered by a thin layer of straw- or golden-yellow pigmented hyphae 0.5–1.5 µm wide, and internally delimited by a light yellow layer. The authors considered this construction of the ectal excipulum as different from typical members of Hymenoscyphus. However, the present re-examination of the excipular texture (Figure 12(g)) revealed no substantial differences from, e.g., Hy. albidus, Hy. fraxineus, and Hy. aesculi.

The description given above is based on the present re-examination of the holotype, but it includes also some data of the protologue, mainly in regard to macroscopical features. The petioles from which the apothecia of Hy. honshuanus arise show a dark blackish-grey colour. Korf and Lizoň referred to it as a ‘black substratal stroma’. Similar as in the other species treated in the present paper, a black ring was often seen at the outermost base of the stipe (Figure 12(d)). Contrary to Korf and Lizoň, who stated the asci to be simple-septate, the present examination of two apothecia showed that they arise from croziers (Figure 12(b)). Since the authors did not illustrate the feature, their report of absent croziers remains mysterious. Apart from the abundant hyaline ascospores, only a single spore with a pale ochre-brown wall was seen in the present examination. It must be stated, however, that the asci, spores and paraphyses were distinctly wider than indicated by Korf and Lizoň, who measured them as follows: asci (82–)84.5–100(–116) × (5.6–)6.6–7.5(–8.3) µm, spores (13.8–)15.4–16.9(–18.5) × (2.3–)3.1–3.5(–3.8) µm, paraphyses 1.5 µm wide. The protologue appears to be based exclusively on the Japanese type specimen. Data of the specimen from Germany (on Berberis) were not incorporated, which is obvious from the mentioned larger spore size in the Berberis specimen (Korf & Lizoň 1994, p. 171).

We assume that Hy. honshuanus was incorrectly described by Korf and Lizoň (1994) concerning the ascus base, though it cannot be excluded that the holotype collection represents a mixtum of two species with deviating ascus base characters as well as ascus and spore measurements. In any case, the present data indicate that the here described specimen is not conspecific with either Hy. aesculi or Hy. caudatus. Hy. caudatus was redescribed by White (1943, p. 151, fig. 8), who observed the absence of croziers in most (though not all) of the many examined specimens, including the holotype. Regrettably, White did not specify the aberrant material in which he saw croziers.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is tmyc-5-228-g007.jpg

Hymenoscyphus fraxineus (Europe): a. apothecium in median and rachis in cross section (the black demarcation line covers the outer face of the sclerenchyma), b–f. apothecial stipe in median section (with internal crystals), g. rachis in cross section (with external demarcation line, cells of sclerenchyma containing hyphae), h–k. external view on pseudosclerotial plate (tangential section of rachis surface); cells of cortical parenchyma densely filled with hyaline or ± brown hyphae (textura epidermoidea). – All in living state. – a. H.B. 9596 (DE-BW, Tübingen), b, f–g. H.B. 9589 (DE-BY, Amberg), c–e. H.B. 9593 (DE-SN, Chemnitz), h–k. H.B. 9588 (DE-BY, Hirschau).

Because of the striking morphological similarity with Hy. fraxineus, it would be interesting to determine the ITS sequence of Hy. honshuanus. However, this approach requires careful examination of single apothecia for the presence of croziers, in order to avoid confusion in the case of a mixtum. Actually, a further Japanese record (on petioles of Aesculus sp. kindly sent by T. Hosoya, TNS-F-12758) differs from H. honshuanus in the ascus base, indicating that two different species exist in Japan: the asci arise here from simple septa (Figure 15), and the species is, therefore, included in Hy. aesculi.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is tmyc-5-228-g015.jpg

Hymenoscyphus aesculi: a–b, e, r. fresh apothecia (e: in median section, petioles in cross section); c–d. senescent apothecia (with dark bluish-olive patches on receptacle); f–g. stipe base in median section, showing erumpent growth and absence of crystals; h. cortical parenchyma and sclerenchyma below insertion of apothecial stipe, densely filled with intracellular hyphae; i. sclerenchyma forming a radial ray, loosely filled with hyphae; j–l. ectal excipulum at stipe and (l) at lower flanks in median section, showing VBs in cortical cells; m. ascus apices with euamyloid apical ring; n–q. ascospores (n–o, q: freshly ejected); s–t. surface view on stipe base, showing brown cortical cells and hairs. – Living state, except for m (in KOH+IKI), o (in KOH+CRB), p (in H2O?). – a. 31.VII.2011 (DE-HS, Darmstadt), b–p. H.B. 9701 (Darmstadt), q–t. C.Y. F/2194 (UK-Yorkshire, Halifax). – Phot. a, p: H. Lotz, q–t: C. Yeates.

With the present data, Korf and Lizoň’s conclusion that Lambertellinia scutuloides has an Idriella anamorph needs to be reinvestigated. Experiments with cultures of the common and plurivorous Hy. caudatus, but also Hy. vacini, a taxon specific to leaves of Acer, kept under varying conditions as proposed by Kimbrough and Atkinson (1972), could clarify whether or not any of these species are connected to an Idriella anamorph.

The German specimen on Berberis (Sydow, Mycotheca Marchica no. 1576, 1887) remains of unclear identity. The apothecia are said to arise from stromatized veins and petioles, but the presence or absence of croziers was not stated by Korf and Lizoň. When dry, the apothecia were ‘dark brown (almost blackish)’. The spores measured 16.2–19.8 × 3.6–4.8 µm and were ‘cylindric-clavate, scutuloid, deep brown to hyaline’. The exsiccatum was issued under the name Helotium berberidis Syd., but without a diagnosis on the label (Korf & Lizoň 1994).

Hy. honshuanus is known with certainty only from the type collection on Aesculus turbinata. Reports under the names He. robergei or Hymenoscyphus albidus on fallen petioles of Aesculus indica in Northern India and Nepal might well concern Hy. honshuanus (or Hy. aesculi), but the ascus base was not studied for the presence of croziers (see discussion under Hy. albidus).

The type locality of Hy. honshuanus is not exactly known, and the collector, Daisuke Shimizu, who was a zoologist specialized in vegetable wasps, passed away in 1998. The small town Oguni(-machi) belongs in the Nishiokitama district and lies 55 km WSW of Yamagata. The village Tsugawa could not be located (it was included in Oguni in 1960), but its altitude was found to be 294 m (T. Hosoya personal communication). Oguni has an altitude of about 140 m; therefore, the type locality must be in one of the adjacent mountain ranges.

Specimens included

Japan: Honshu, Yamagata, Oguni-machi, Tsugawa, on petioles of Aesculus turbinata, 500–800 m, 28.VIII.1961, D. Shimizu (CUP-JA 2252, holotype of Lambertellinia scutuloides, vid. 14.IV.1997).

Hymenoscyphus aesculi (Velen.) Baral & E. Rubio, comb. nov.Figures 131919 – MycoBank MB 809091

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is tmyc-5-228-g012.jpg

Hymenoscyphus aesculi. a. ascospores (partly from inside asci, containing LBs); b. ascus apices with euamyloid apical ring (Hymenoscyphus-type); c. ascus bases arising from simple septa; d. apothecia. – All in dead state.

  • Basionym: Helotium aesculi Velen., Opera Bot. Čech. 4, p. 120 (1947)

  • Lanzia aesculi (Velen.) Svrček, Acta Mus. Nat. Pragae 40 B, p. 131 (1985, ‘1984’)

  • (?) = Hymenoscyphus albidus var. aesculi W. Phillips, Man. Brit. Discom. p. 138 (1887)

  • Phialea albida var. aesculi (W. Phillips) Saccardo, Syll. Fung. 8, p. 254 (1889)

  • Helotium albidum var. aesculi (W. Phillips) Massee, Brit. Fung.-Fl. 4, p. 260 (1895)

Etymology

Named after the inhabited substrate, leaves of Aesculus hippocastanum.

Holotype

Czechia, South Moravia, SE of Brno, Žarošice, petioles of Aesculus hippocastanum, IX.1942, V. Vacek (PRM 148922; Figure 13).

Apothecia

Moist (0.3–)0.6–1.5(–2) mm diam.; disc whitish(-greyish) or pale cream, slightly concave to flat, margin distinct, not protruding, smooth, exterior concolorous; stipe (0.25–)0.5–1.7(–2) × (0.08–)0.15–0.35(–0.42) mm, white, glassy-translucent or non-translucent, slightly pubescent, lower half gradually darker, near base black, erumpent from sclerenchyma-phloem layer; hymenium dry light to dark greyish- to blackish-brown, exterior pale olivaceous-grey. Asci *86–100(–104) × 9–10(–11.5) µm {4}, †(62–)65–75(–80) {4} or (67–)75–100(–116) {5} × (7–)8–9 {7} or (8.5–)9–9.5(–10) {2} µm, 8-spored, spores *obliquely biseriate, pars sporifera *44–54 µm long, *7–10 µm protruding beyond paraphyses; apex (*/†) conical, dome †1.5–2 → 1–1.3 µm thick, apical ring occupying lower 1/2–9/10 of dome, medium to strongly blue (bb) in IKI, apically gradually or abruptly inamyloid, Hymenoscyphus-type {11}; base arising from simple septa {15}, never with a subbasal protuberance. Ascospores *(14–)15–20(–22)((–24)) × (3.7–)4.2–5(–5.2) µm {12}, †(14.5–)16–19(–21.5) × (3–)3.3–4(–5.5) µm {4}, strongly scutuloid, (*) fusiform with inflated middle part {14}, (†) cylindric-fusoid, median inflation much less distinct, apex rounded to obtuse, with a slight to strong lateral protrusion, base attenuated, ± acute, straight, sometimes inequilateral or slightly, rarely medium curved; containing (1–)2–3(–4) LBs (1–)1.5–2.5(–2.8) µm diam. and several small ones in each half {15}, lipid content 4–5; with very delicate sheath that detaches from the wall when ejected, setulae absent; overmature eguttulate, aseptate, (†) pale to light brown (cytoplasm?). Paraphyses apically uninflated, terminal cell *50–75 × 3.5–4.5(–5) µm {1}, †25–55 × (2–)2.5–3.5(–4) µm {T}, lower cells *8–20 × 2–4(–6) µm {1}. Medullary excipulum of ± dense, vertically orientated textura porrecta or more loose t. intricata in central region (towards hymenium t. prismatica), individual cells *(16–)25–55(–100) × (6–)8–12(–15) µm {2}, medium sharply delimited from ectal excipulum by a 30–40 µm thick layer of textura porrecta, individual cells *60–100 × 5–10 µm {1}. Ectal excipulum hyaline, of (*) thin-walled († very slightly gelatinized) textura prismatica, at lower flanks 30–70 µm thick, cells *15–30(–50) × (8–)12–22 µm {3}, †11–23 × 12–20 µm {2}, brick-shaped, at margin 15–20 µm thick, cells *9–14 × 8–12.5 µm, externally covered by a scattered network of hyphae, individual cells *15–25 × 4.5–11 µm {2}; cortex of stipe near base with slightly gelatinized brick-shaped cells *7–23 x 5–9 µm {1}, †9–15 × 8–10 µm {T}, at very base medium gelatinized, sparsely to densely covered by short, hyaline to bright grey-brown hairs 10–20 × 3–7.5 µm {2}. VBs in paraphyses medium to strongly refractive {9}, hyaline, multiguttulate but soon angular to very elongate, occupying upper (25–)35–60(–83) µm {2}, staining yellowish in IKI, turning bright brass-yellow to olivaceous-brown in dead cells or in the herbarium; rarely with a few pale yellow-orange LBs up to 1 µm diam.; VBs in cortical hyphae of stipe and receptacle medium refractive, large and elongate, or strongly refractive, globose. CRB: spore wall unstained or faintly lilac, gel in ectal and medullary excipulum deep lilac, VBs bright turquoise. Crystals absent in entire apothecial tissue. Exudate on exterior of receptacle and stipe absent. Anamorph: unknown.

Habitat

On fallen previous year’s dark brown to blackish petioles {13}, also on darkened primary and secondary veins {8} (upper and especially lower face) of Aesculus sp. {1}, A. hippocastanum {21}. Assoc.: Allophylaria nervicola {1}, Calycellina lachnobrachya {1}, Calycellina ?leucella {1}, Calycina discreta {1}, Hymenoscyphus caudatus {1}, Mollisina acerina {1}. Desiccation tolerance: not examined. Geology: löss, limestone, etc. Phenology: (VII–)VIII–IX(–X). Altitude: 3–700 m (in Europe), 1325 m (in Japan).

Specimens included

All on Aesculus hippocastanum, except for Japan: Aesculus sp.

England: Yorkshire, 8.5 km SSE of Halifax, 1.8 km NW of Huddersfield, Edgerton area, 148 m, veins, 24.VIII.2012, C. Yeates (C.Y. F/2194, d.v.). – Czechia: South Moravia, 30 km SE of Brno, Žarošice, ~220 m, petioles, IX.1942, V. Vacek (PRM 148922, holotype, vid. 19.XII.2011). – Belgium: West Vlaanderen, 7.5 km ENE of Ostende, 2.5 km NE of Bredene, D’Heye, 3 m, petioles, 19.VIII.1994, B. Declercq (B.D. 94/105, n.v.). – 5 km ESE of Brugge, 1.8 km WSW of Sijsele, Rijckevelde, 12 m, petioles, 2.IX.2000, B. Declercq (B.D. 00/073, d.v.). – Oost Vlaanderen, 16 km NE of Gent, 3.8 km SSE of Wachtebeke, Puyenbroeck, 3 m, petioles, 14.VIII.1993, B. Declercq (B.D. 93/137, d.v.). – Germany: Niedersachsen, ~8 km E of Walsrode, ?1 km NE of Fallingbostel, Böhmetal, Geesthang, ~40 m, petioles and veins, 19.VIII.1990, B. Grauwinkel (d.v.). – 12 km S of Hamburg, Harburg, city park, 25 m, petioles, 27.VIII.2008, M. Vega (H.B. 8914). – Sachsen, 3.5 km NE of Chemnitz, Zeisigwald, 380 m, veins, 15.VIII.2010, B. Mühler (H.B. 9417ø). – Hessen, 8.7 km NE of Darmstadt, 1 km W of Messel, Mörsbacher Grund, 170 m, petioles and veins, 31.VII.2011, H. Lotz-Winter (d.v.). – ibid., petioles and veins, 10.VII.2012 (H.B. 9701). – Baden-Württemberg, 7.5 km ESE of Gaildorf, 2.5 km NE of Sulzbach-Laufen, Kohlenstraße, Brandwald, 490 m, petioles, 26.VIII.1996, W. Hena (H.B. 5736, vid. 25.III.1997). – 6 km W of Stuttgart, 2.3 km SSE of Solitude, Bärensträßle, 455 m, leaf, 5.IX.1975, H.O. Baral (H.B. 474ø). – 6 km WSW of Stuttgart, 2.5 km S of Solitude, Bärenkopf, 440 m, petioles and veins, 18.VII.1988, H.O. Baral (H.B. 3467). – 6.3 km NE of Tübingen, 1.8 km NNE of Pfrondorf, Rotes Tor, 475 m, veins, 22.X.1991, H.O. Baral (ø). – 2 km NW of Pfrondorf, Ziegelhäule, 465 m, petiole, 13.X.2013, H.O. Baral (ø). – 8 km NE of Radolfzell, 1 km SE of Bodman, S of castle, 430 m, leaf, 17.VIII.1976, H.O. Baral (ø). – Bayern, 13 km SE of Coburg, 1 km SW of Weidhausen, Rödertal, 310 m, petioles, 8. & 24.VIII.1987, H. Engel (PRM, H.E. 8433). – 10.5 km SW of Starnberg, 2 km NW of Tutzing, Deixlfurter See, 700 m, petioles, 13.VIII.2006, B. Fellmann (ø). – Switzerland: Schaffhausen, 2.5 km NE of Schaffhausen, 1.8 km W of Gennersbrunn, Rheinhardt (Solenberg), 480 m, petioles, ~20.VIII.1988, P. Blank (ø). – Spain: Asturias, 22.5 km NNE of Villablino, 5 km N of Somiedo, NW of Castro, La Malva, 560 m, petioles, 13.X.2012, E. Rubio (E.R.D. 5685, d.v.). – Japan: Honshu, Nagano, 19 km SE of Nagano, 1 km SE of Sugadaira, Arboretum, 1325 m, veins, 11.IX.2006, T. Hosoya (TNS-F-12758).

Characterization

Hymenoscyphus aesculi resembles Hy. albidus in many respects, including simple-septate ascus bases. Like Hy. albidus, it occurs wide-spread within Europe, where it appears to be specific to leaves of Aesculus hippocastanum. Yet, a single Japanese record indicates a wider distribution area for Hy. aesculi. The species differs from Hy. albidus in several characteristics: (1) the living ascospores consistently show a central swelling (bulge); therefore, they look fusiform rather than cylindrical to fusoid as in Hy. albidus; (2) the internal tissue of the stipe base is entirely devoid of crystals; (3) Hy. albidus generally shows a thin yellowish layer of exudate on the entire exterior, especially on the stipe, which is absent in Hy. aesculi; (4) senescent apothecia turn dark olivaceous-grey to blackish-brown whilst those of Hy. albidus turn cream to orange though sometimes also dark brown. These differences hold true also for a comparison with Hy. fraxineus, the latter differing from the other two in having croziers.

Type studies and circumscription

In the protologue of Helotium aesculi, Velenovský (1947) described the apothecia as white, 2–4 mm diam., later with a black stipe, the spores as 12–17 × 6–7 µm, with an indistinctly acute base and a series of guttules, and the asci as 130–150 × 6–8 µm. In comparison with the here presented description, these measurements fit only concerning spore length and ascus width, whereas apothecial size, spore width and ascus length are extraordinary large and perhaps erroneous, even when taking living elements into consideration.

Svrček (1989) did not describe the type material of He. aesculi, but he stated that it fully concurs with some fresh specimens studied by him. This is astonishing, because he measured the asci in one of his collections with 65–85 × 7–10 µm without discussing the discrepancy to the protologue. He also noted (p. 74) that ‘the original Velenovský diagnosis is not accurate if compared with V. Vacek’s [the finder of the holotype] handwritten notes’.

No such handwritten notes were seen when the holotype was re-examined in the present study. It revealed an ascus size (see Figure 13) compatible with Svrček’s above-mentioned measurement which likewise undoubtedly refers to dead asci. The contents of many paraphyses were bright olivaceous-brown, and in cross section of a petiole a distinct black stroma could be seen which surrounds the sclerenchyma on its outer as well as inner face.

Svrček (1989, pl. 2 fig. 4) illustrated a personal collection from near Praha, which he considered conspecific with the type of Helotium aesculi. Concerning his reasons to transfer the species to Lanzia, Svrček (1985) referred to a paper in press which, however, does not treat this species (see also under Hy. vacini). Probably he proposed the combination because of the blackish stroma, but in 1989 he mentioned merely the dark stipe base, not the substratal stroma. The drawn spores look as if they were in the living state, according to the regular lipid content. Svrček (1989, p. 20) described them as ‘fusiform, clavate, often strongly tapering below and curved, filled with many small and larger guttules’, 15–24.5 × (3.5–)4–5 µm, i.e., rather variable in length. The spores lack the central swelling, however, and the LBs are drawn distinctly smaller than in any of the here studied collections. Svrček examined also a further specimen from Southern Bohemia and one that H. Engel sent to him from Weidhausen near Coburg. The latter collection was also examined in the present study and found to have predominantly strongly fusiform spores with a central bulge and four rather large LBs, unlike the sketch by Engel and Hanff (1989, p. 40) that shows no central bulge and only rather small LBs.

In all collections of Hy. aesculi studied by the first author in the fresh state, the characteristic central swelling of the living spores was noted in a major part of the freshly ejected spores (see Figures 16(i), 16(m); 18(n)). A central swelling is also obvious in some or all spores of fresh collections drawn by B. Grauwinkel (personal communication) from Fallingbostel (Niedersachsen), B. Fellmann (personal communication) from Starnberg (Oberbayern), B. Declercq (personal communication) from Wachtebeke (Eastern Flanders), and Beyer (1998) from Bayreuth (Oberfranken). This swelling is further evident in almost every spore of a British record photographed by C. Yeates (personal communication, Figure 18(p)), and in one from Asturias by E. Rubio (personal communication, Figure 17(c)(d)).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is tmyc-5-228-g013.jpg

Hymenoscyphus aesculi: a–d, l. fresh apothecia; j–k. dry apothecia (phot. over 3 years after collection); g. cortical ectal excipulum of receptacle in surface view (VBs in living cells, distorted brass-yellow cytoplasm of scattered external hyphae); h. paraphyses in squash mount (containing VBs); e–f. turgescent mature asci; i, m. ascospores (freshly ejected, containing LBs). – All in living state (except for j–k, brass-yellow cells in g). – a–f, h–i. H.B. 8914 (DE-NI, Hamburg); g. H.B. 9843 (DE-BW, Tübingen); l–m. H.B. 9417 (DE-SN, Chemnitz). – Phot. l: B. Mühler.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is tmyc-5-228-g014.jpg

Hymenoscyphus aesculi: a–b. fresh apothecia; j–l, p. rehydrated apothecia (colour was originally white except for base of stipe); f–g, o. asci and paraphyses(o: with olive secondary pigment especially in paraphyses); h. ascus apices with euamyloid apical ring; i: simple-septate ascus base; c–e. ascospores; m–n, q–s. cross section through cortical region of petioles, with black demarcation line surrounding the sclerenchyma on outer and inner face (cortical parenchyma above and phloem beneath being entirely decomposed). – Living state: c–g; dead state: h (in IKI), o (in H2O). – a–i. E.R.D. 5685 (ES-Asturias, Somiedo); j–o. H.B. 5736 (DE-BW, Gaildorf); p–s. TNS-F-12758 (JP-Honshu, Nagano, Sugadaira). – Phot. a–i: E. Rubio.

However, the peculiar spore shape of Hy. aesculi is state-dependent and well recognizable only in living spores. The loss of the spore bulge under treatment with KOH is illustrated on Figure 18(n)(o). Apart from the holotype, two specimens of Hy. aesculi were studied in the dead state only (Figure 1415), and these were first thought to deviate from typical Hy. aesculi in ascospores devoid of a central swelling. From the observed influence of spore turgor on spore shape; however, we assume that they also possessed a central swelling in the living state. In the holotype of Hy. aesculi (Figure 13), a few of the fusoid spores still showed the median swelling characteristic of the living spores. In conclusion, one of the most diagnostic markers to separate Hy. aesculi from Hy. albidus is partially or entirely obscured in herbarium material.

The medullary excipulum in the central part of the receptacle of Hy. aesculi was found to be composed of a rather dense, upwards oriented textura prismatica-porrecta, unlike Hy. albidus and Hy. fraxineus for which we have always observed a loose t. intricata. However, this feature was only tested in one collection (H.B. 9701) and needs further study.

All presently known European records of Hy. aesculi grew on leaves of Aesculus hippocastanum. The species fruits between July and October, predominantly in August. A distribution map under the name Lanzia aesculi for W-Germany is presented in Krieglsteiner (Krieglsteiner 1993, pl. 744), with 13 grid squares distributed in Niedersachsen, Bayern, and Baden-Württemberg (including Northern Switzerland). One of the two examined Japanese specimens on blackened Aesculus petioles (as Lanzia sp.) is here referred to Hy. aesculi (Figure 15, 17(p)(s)) because of the absence of croziers and the lack of crystals in the stipe base; the other is the type of Hy. honshuanus (≡Lambertellinia scutuloides) and deviates from Hy. aesculi in having croziers.

Nomenclature, misidentification as Hymenoscyphus albidus

Authors appear to have previously merged Hy. aesculi under Hy. albidus. This is undoubtedly true for reports on petioles of Aesculus from Great Britain under that name (FRDBI). However, we here provide arguments that two different species of Hymenoscyphus occur on that substrate. They were formerly treated in the Sclerotiniaceae under the names Lan. aesculi (Velen.) Svrček (1985) and Lambertellinia scutuloides Korf and Lizoň (1994), but are transferred to Hymenoscyphus in the present paper based on their morphological similarity to Hy. albidus and their overall characteristics suggesting this genus. The latter is here given the new name Hy. honshuanus, and differs from Hy. aesculi in the presence of croziers, also in wider ascospores, yellowish apothecia that do not turn dark with age, longer stipes, and narrower ectal excipular cells.

Phillips (1887, p. 138) distinguished between typical Hymenoscyphus albidus (on petioles of Fraxinus) and Hy. albidus var. aesculi (on petioles of Aesculus), based on a collection from Shobdon Court, Herefordshire, on the basis of larger, more frequently clavate spores (20–23 × 4–5 µm). Phillips’ brief diagnosis does not mention a darkened substrate, but his remark ‘the stem is often brown at the base’ in Hy. albidus suggests that this character was also present in his specimen on Aesculus. Massee (1895, p. 260) and Saccardo (1889, p. 254) merely copied Phillips’ protologue. The type material has apparently never been re-examined. Judging from the clavate spores this might well be a synonym of Velenovský’s He. aesculi. A spore length around 23 µm was only very rarely seen in the present study, but falls in the wide range given by Svrček. Records on petioles of Aesculus under the name Hymenoscyphus albidus in the database of the British Mycological Society very probably also belong to Hy. aesculi. Also collections on leaves of Aesculus indica in Northern India and Nepal reported by Thind and Singh (1969) and others might belong to Hy. aesculi (or Hy. honshuanus), but the ascus base was not studied for the presence of croziers (see discussion under Hy. albidus).

He. scutula var. aesculicarpa Syd. was described from capsules of Aesculus and probably represents a member of the Hymenoscyphus fructigenus-complex. Dennis (1964, p. 64) examined the type material and also further British specimens on Aesculus capsules and petioles. He concluded that all of them belong in the scope of the collective species He. scutula, a herbicolous taxon which includes, in his opinion, also the foliicolous Hy. caudatus. Since Dennis did not mention any blackening of the substrate, the studied specimens on petioles seem to belong to Hy. caudatus rather than Hy. aesculi.

Hymenoscyphus vacini (Velen.) Baral & E. Weber, Bibliotheca Mycol. 140, p. 121 (1992) – Figures 202222

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is tmyc-5-228-g017.jpg

Hymenoscyphus vacini: a. ascospores (freshly ejected, containing large and small LBs); b. ascus apex with euamyloid apical ring (Hymenoscyphus-type); c. simple-septate ascus base; d. paraphyses containing elongate, low-refractive vacuoles, partly with scattered internal globose VBs of high refractivity; e. cortical hypha of ectal excipulum covered by olive-brown exudate; f. apothecium emerging from net veins of Acer leaf. – Living state (except for b).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is tmyc-5-228-g019.jpg

Hymenoscyphus vacini: a–c. cross section through cortical region of net vein (in H2O), showing black demarcation line surrounding the sclerenchyma on outer and inner face (cortical parenchyma above and phloem beneath being entirely decomposed); fungal hyphae visible inside cells; d–e. apothecial stipe in surface view (slightly squashed, in KOH). – a–c. H.B. 9590 (DE-ST, Merseburg); d–e. H.B. 456 (DE-BW, Stuttgart).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is tmyc-5-228-g018.jpg

Hymenoscyphus vacini (on leaves of Acer): a–b. freshly ejected ascospores (containing LBs); c. mature turgescent ascus; d–f. paraphyses (containing pale yellowish VBs); g. mature turgescent asci projecting beyond paraphyses; h–n. fresh apothecia; o. ectal excipulum at lower flanks in median section; p. ectal excipulum at mid flanks in surface view, with olive-brown exudate; q. do., towards base of stipe. – All in living state. – a, c–k, m–q. H.B. 9590 (DE-ST, Merseburg); b, l: H.B. 8296 (DE-BY, München).

  • Helotium vacini Velen., Novitates mycologicae, p. 185 (1940)

  • Lanzia vacini (Velen.) Spooner, in Kirk & Spooner, Kew Bull., p. 570 (1984)

Etymology

Named after the collector, V. Vacek.

Holotype

Czechia, South Moravia, Žarosiče, Čtvrtý Žlíbek, veins of Acer platanoides, 21.VIII.1939, V. Vacek (PRM 148882; not seen).

Apothecia

Moist (0.5–)0.7–1.5(–2)((–3)) mm diam.; disc whitish or pale cream, turing yellowish-ochraceous, slightly concave to flat, margin thin, ± smooth, exterior whitish to pale cream, often densely covered by very fine brownish fibres; stipe 0.2–0.5(–0.8) × 0.2–0.4 mm, concolorous with receptacle, partly translucent, mostly strongly blackened at the base, erumpent from sclerenchyma-phloem layer; dry yellowish-ochraceous. Asci *(90–)100–115(–122) × (9.5–)10.5–12(–12.8) µm {6}, †90–110 × 10–11 µm {1}, *6–13 µm longer than paraphyses, 8-spored, spores *obliquely biseriate, pars sporifera *54–67(–71) µm long, tardily or rapidly ejecting spores in water mount; apex (†) conical, dome †2–2.5 µm thick, apical ring occupying lower 1/2–2/3 of dome, IKI medium to strongly blue (bb), apically abruptly fading, Hymenoscyphus-type {6}; base short and broad, arising from simple septa {7}, never with a subbasal protuberance. Ascospores *(19–)20–25(–28)((–34)) × (3.7–)4.5–5.5(–6.5) µm {9}, †20–25 × (3.5–)4–4.5(–5) µm {2}, mostly very distinctly scutuloid, cylindrical to strongly fusiform, apex rounded to obtuse, with a slight to strong lateral protrusion, base strongly attenuated, often acute, rarely tail-like, straight to slightly inequilateral or curved, containing 3–10 medium-sized LBs [1–1.8(–2.5)((–3)) µm diam.] and many small ones in each half {10}, lipid content 4–5; sheath not observed, setulae absent; wall surface CRB–; overmature 1–2-septate, with hyaline or pale yellow wall, lipid content low. Paraphyses apically uninflated, terminal cell *(30–)37–70(–95) {2} × (3–)3.5–5(–6) {4} µm. Ectal excipulum hyaline, at flanks of t. prismatica-angularis oriented at a low angle to the surface, cells broadly brick-shaped, *15–30 × 12–18 µm {2}, externally partly covered by 5–8 µm wide hyphae (somewhat undulating near margin); near base of stipe of ± thick-walled, angular to globose cells; on receptacle and stipe with radial lines or scattered patches of bright olivaecous-brown rough exudate (also on cortical hyphae near margin), near base of stipe black-brown. VBs in paraphyses very faintly to medium (rarely strongly) refractive, hyaline to pale amber-yellow, round or angular to very elongate, extending (30–)40–60(–85) µm from tip, low-refractive vacuoles partly containing a number of scattered or grouped, globose, strongly refractive VB-guttules 0.5–2 µm diam. {4}; VBs partly turning red-brown in IKI. Crystals absent in complete tissue including stipe base. Anamorph: unknown.

Habitat

Aceri-Fraxinetum, Galio-Carpinetum, Pruno-Fraxinetum, Salicetum, on fallen previous year’s entirely skeletonized leaves, on primary, secondary and net veins (upper and lower face) of Acer sp. {5}, A. platanoides {2}, A. pseudoplatanus {16/1}. Assoc.: Lachnum rhytismatis {1}. Desiccation tolerance: After 2 days in the dry state, some cells of ectal excipulum at flanks and many spores still alive. Geology: limestone, gneiss, Knollenmergel. Phenology: VIII–IX(–X). Altitude: 25–905 m.

Characterization

Hymenoscyphus vacini differs from Hy. albidus s.l. in rather large ascospores that contain a few medium-sized and many small LBs in the living state, also in apothecia with brownish external fibres, a comparatively short stipe with a dark brown base, and a strict occurrence on entirely skeletonized leaves of Acer.

Nomenclature and circumscription

Spooner (in Kirk & Spooner 1984, p. 570, fig. 11) gave a detailed description based on three British records on leaves of Acer pseudoplatanus. For one of them, he stated the substrate to be skeletonized. In a section of the stipe base and the vein beneath, he figured a small but distinct, black internal stroma that surrounds the vascular bundle and the sclerenchyma of the vein. Although Spooner noted that ‘there is no clear stromatic development visible on the substratum surface’, the dark brown external appearance of the veins in the here reported specimens is clearly due to the black internal stroma, which is located below the cortical parenchyma. With its demarcation line surrounding both sides of the sclerenchyma (Figure 22), this stroma corresponds to the type of pseudosclerotium observed in Hy. aesculi.

Spooner saw a close resemblance in spore shape with typical species of Hymenoscyphus, but he followed the current opinion to consider a dark stroma, though superficially invisible, as a family character of the Sclerotiniaceae (today Rutstroemiaceae). Because of the ectal excipulum with its thin-walled prismatic cells covered by a cortical layer of brown- and rough-walled hyphae and the hyaline spores, Spooner transferred the species to Lanzia. Independently hereof, also Svrček (Svrček 1985, p. 182) placed the species in Lanzia. When doing this superfluous combination, Svrček referred to a manuscript in press on that species (‘New or less known Discomycetes. 14. Čes. Mykol. 40’, 1986). However, neither Lan. vacini nor Lan. aesculi, to which he also refers, is mentioned there. Maybe he refrained from this report when being aware of Spooner’s contribution to Lan. vacini. His illustration of the holotype (Svrček 1985, pl. 17 fig. 5) fits very well the present specimens.

Collections of Hy. vacini were reported as an unnamed species by the first author (in Baral & Krieglsteiner 1985, p. 123), who compared it with Hy. caudatus and He. fraternus (Peck) Dennis, taxa with often longer, basally not darkened stipes. The latter grows on non-blackened petioles of Acer in North America (White 1942, p. 173, as Helotium fraternum). When Korf and Zhuang (1985) transferred Hymenoscyphus serotinus (Pers.: Fr.) W. Phillips to Lanzia, they believed that this species is not specifically distinct from Hy. vacini; i.e., they took Hy. serotinus in a wide concept that includes both wood and leaves as host.

Specimens included

All on skeletonized leaves of Acer pseudoplatanus, in a few cases Acer sp. or A. platanoides.

B elgium: West Vlaanderen, 7 km ENE of Wingene, 3.7 km NNW of Ruiselede, 1 km W of Kruiskerke, Vortebossen, 25 m, 11.XI.1997, B. Declercq (B.D. 97/101, d.v.). – Germany: Sachsen-Anhalt, 17 km WSW of Merseburg, 2.8 km WSW of Albersroda, Müchelholz, 190 m, 20.VIII.2011, P. Rönsch (H.B. 9590). – Baden-Württemberg, 9 km ENE of Karlsruhe, 2 km SW of Weingarten, Weingartener Moor, 115 m, leaves of ?Acer pseudoplatanus, 16.IX.1985, W. Winterhoff (W.W. 85315). – 6.5 km W of Stuttgart, 1 km W of Solitude, 500 m, leaves of Acer sp., 21.IX.1976, H.O. Baral (ø). – 5 km WNW of Stuttgart, 2 km S of Weilimdorf, Möglinger Stellerain, 380 m, 13.IX.1975, H.O. Baral (H.B. 456). – 6 km NW of Stuttgart, ~2 km NW of Feuerbach, Lemberg, ~360 m, 20.IX.1975, H.O. Baral (ø). – ibid., 12.X.1975, H.O. Baral (ø). – ibid., 29.IX.1976, H.O. Baral (ø). – ibid., 20.IX.1975, H.O. Baral (ø). – 5.5 km NE of Tübingen, NE of Pfrondorf, Gähklinge, 410 m, 5.IX.1988, H.O. Baral (H.B. 3552). – 5.5 km WSW of Reutlingen, S of Ohmenhausen, Löcherwiesenweg, 430 m, 16.IX.1989, H.O. Baral & E. Weber (ø). – 9 km SSW of Reutlingen, 2.3 km ESE of Gönningen, Gönninger Seen, 600 m, 16.IX.1989, H.O. Baral (ø). – ~1.7 km N of Kirchheim u. Teck, Hohes Reisach, ~380 m, leaves of Acer sp., 25.VIII.1988, L.G. Krieglsteiner (H.B. 3535). – 8.5 km ENE of Radolfzell, 1.4 km NNW of Langenrain, Teufelstal, 430 m, 25.VIII.1976, H.O. Baral (ø). – 9.7 km ENE of Radolfzell, 1.4 km ENE of Langenrain, Marienschlucht, 450 m, 24.VIII.1976, H.O. Baral (H.B. 782). – 8.3 km NE of Radolfzell, 3.3 km SE of Bodman, SE of camping area, 410 m, 25.VIII.1976, H.O. Baral (ø). – 8 km NE of Radolfzell, 1 km SE of Bodman, S of castle, 430 m, 18. & 19.VIII.1976, H.O. Baral (H.B. 781a, 781bø). – 3.8 km NE of Radolfzell, 1.6 km SE of Möggingen, SW of Mindelsee, 410 m, 28.VIII.1976, H.O. Baral (ø). – Bayern, 14 km NNE of Amberg, 1 km N of Hirschau, Frühmess, 450 m, 27.IX.1991, H.O. Baral & E. Weber (ø). – Bayerischer Wald, 12 km SE of Zwiesel, ~4.5 km NNE of Spiegelau, Lärchenberg, S-slope of Rachel, ~890 m, leaves of indet. angiosperm, 5.IX.1989, N. Luschka (REG 374, vid. E. Weber). – 9.5 km SE of München, 1 km E of Neuperlach, Kieswerk, Putzbrunner Str., 545 m, leaves of Acer sp., 27.VIII.2006, B. Fellmann (H.B. 8296). – Austria: Salzburg, 7.5 km WSW of Salzburg, 1 km SW of Wals, Saalach-Altarm, 437 m, leaves of Acer sp., 15.V.1993, W. Dämon (W.D. 11/93). – Steiermark, 4 km WNW of Gröbming, 0.8 km NW of Weyern, Lend, 905 m, 5.IX.2009, G. Friebes (ø, d.v.). – Czechia: South Moravia, ~30 km SE of Brno, near Žarosiče, Čtvrtý Žlíbek, ~300 m, veins of Acer platanoides, 21.VIII.1939, V. Vacek (PRM 148882, holotype, d.v.). – ibid., veins of A. pseudoplatanus and A. platanoides. 27.VIII.1946 (PRM 683912, n.v.).

Key to species of Hymenoscyphus that form a dark stroma in leaves (rarely twigs) of Acer, Aesculus, Fraxinus, and Picrasma (see also Table 3)

Table 3.

Survey of some selected ecological and morphological features of the five here treated foliicolous species of Hymenoscyphus with a black stroma (ascus and spore size in Asian Hy. fraxineus after description in Hosoya et al. (1993) and a drawing by J.G. Han personal communication).

 Hy. albidusHy. fraxineusHy. fraxineusHy. honshuanusHy. aesculiHy. vacini
DistributionEuropeEuropeE-AsiaE-AsiaEurope, [E-Asia]Europe
HostF. excelsior, F. angustifoliaF. excelsior, F. angustifoliaF. mandshurica, F. rhynchophyllaAesculus turbinataAesculus hippocastanumAcer pseudoplatanus
Phenology(VI–)VII–IX(–X)(V–)VI–IXVII–IXVIIIVII–XVIII–IX(–X)
Period of record1850–20122006–20141990–201119611942 – 20121939–2006
Altitude [m]3–16903–112023–1325~500–8003–700[–1325]115–905
Ascospores [µm)*(14.5–)15–18.5(–19.5) × (3.8–)4–4.7(–5)*(15–)16–20(–22) × (3.7–)4–4.5(–5)†14–21 × 3.2–5†15–20.3 × 3.8–5(–5.4)*(14–)15–20(–21.5) × (3.7–)4.2–5(–5.2)*(16–)20–24(–29) × (3.7–)4.5–5.5(–6.5)
Asci [µm]*91–102 × 10–11.2*97–135 × 10–12.7†96–126 × 8–10†85–94 × 8.5–9*86–104 × 9–11.5*90–113 × 9.5–12.8
Croziers+++
Apoth. [mm](0.8–)1–2.5(–4)(0.7–)1–6(–8.5)(0.5–)1–2.5(–3.3)~1.5–3.5(0.3–)0.6–1.5(–2)0.6–2

Common features: apothecial stipe with a brown to black base that emerges from a subepidermal black stroma; asci with euamyloid apical rings; ascospores always heteropolar (scutuloid), with a high lipid content, without setulae.

  1. Ascospores *(19–)20–24(–28) × (3.7–)4.5–5.5(–6.5) µm, ±fusoid-clavate, containing several medium-sized LBs 1–1.8(–2.5) µm diam. and many small ones; living paraphyses with low- to medium refractive, pale yellowish-amber VBs; apothecia externally brownish striate or punctate; on net veins of skeletonized leaves of Acer, Europe Hy. vacini

    – Ascospores *(13–)14–20(–24) × (3.7–)4–5(–5.5) µm, containing 3–6 large LBs 1.5–3(–4) µm diam. and some small ones; paraphyses with medium to high-refractive, hyaline VBs; apothecia externally whitish or only faintly brownish punctate; on petioles, rachises, primary or secondary veins of other hosts 2

  2. On Aesculus; medullary excipulum in stipe base without crystals; living spores often with a swollen middle part (crystals and swollen spores uncertain for Hy. honshuanus) 3

    – On Fraxinus; medullary excipulum in stipe base always containing crystals; living spores never with a swollen middle part 4

  3. Asci arising from croziers; spores †3.8–5 µm wide; apothecia yellowish, stipe 1–4 mm long; ectal excipular cells at flanks †5–10 µm wide; Japan Hy. honshuanus

    – Asci arising from simple septa; spores †(3–)3.3–3.8(–4) µm wide; apothecia whitish, stipe 0.25–2 mm long; ectal excipular cells at flanks †10–20 µm wide; Europe, Japan Hy. aesculi

  4. Asci arising from simple septa 5

    – Asci arising from croziers 6

  5. Ascospores *(13.5–)14.5–18.5(–20.5) µm long; apothecia (0.8–)1–2.5(–4) mm diam.; on Fraxinus excelsior, fruiting VII–IX, Europe Hy. albidus

    – Ascospores *13.3–16 µm long; apothecia 0.6–2.8 mm diam.; pseudosclerotium linear, 0.5–0.8 mm wide, on one side of the rachises of Fraxinus platypodia, fruiting IX, Japan Hy. linearis

  6. Crystals in stipe base mostly aggregated in druses; spores *(15–)16–21(–22) µm long; apothecia (0.7–)1–6(–8.5) mm diam.; on Fraxinus spp., fruiting VI–IX, Eastern Asia but introduced to Europe Hy. fraxineus

    – Crystals in stipe base singly; spores †15.5–18.7 µm long; apothecia 0.6–2 mm diam.; on Picrasma quassioides, fruiting VIII, Eastern China Hy. albidoides

Remarks on teleomorph and anamorph features of the treated species

Apothecial colour

Except for the blackish base of the stipe and sometimes some brownish dots on the receptacle, fresh apothecia of Hy. albidus, Hy. fraxineus, and Hy. aesculi appear as macroscopically pure white, which is reflected by the specific epithet of Hy. albidus. The white colour is astonishing since, under the microscope, the surface of the receptacle and stipe in Hy. albidus and Hy. fraxineus was often covered by a pale to bright golden-yellow-ochraceous, though very thin exudate.

In the dry state, the apothecia attain also macroscopically a pale to bright yellowish-cream to orange colour, which is partly due to this exudate, but also to oxidation of the VBs inside the paraphyses and in the cortical hyphae that cover the ectal excipulum. For instance, Svrček (1985, p. 132) stressed that fresh apothecia of Hy. albidus turn rust-coloured when bruised, a colour change for which these vacuolar contents are responsible.

In Hy. aesculi a striking colour change of the receptacle, particularly the hymenium, towards olivaceous-grey to blackish was observed in rehydrated material (Figures 16(g), (j)(k), 17(j)(l), 18(o)(p), 18(c)(d)), which was not found to be mentioned in the literature, except for those specimens from Aesculus indica misidentified as Hy. albidus by Sharma (1991). Svrček (1989, p. 73) merely stated the pure white apothecia did not turn reddish. The bright olivaceous-brown pigment (Figure 11(f)) is located in the cytoplasm, especially in the upper part of the paraphyses, and likewise seems to originate from an oxidative chemical change of the VBs in the dead state.

Size

Apothecial disc diameters were found to vary strongly within a species. In those on leaves, the diameter seems to depend mainly upon whether the apothecia emerge from a thick petiole or from thin veins. Although Hy. vacini grows on thin net veins of skeletonized leaves, this species is able to produce rather large apothecia.

In Hy. fraxineus a tendency towards larger apothecia in comparison with Hy. albidus is confirmed in the present study (see Tables 1 and and2).2). A clear trend towards larger apothecia in Hy. fraxineus (maximum 3–7 mm diam.) was reported by Kowalski (2012) in a table, while Queloz et al. (2011) stated that they could not observe any difference in apothecial size between the two species. The disc diameter of Hy. albidus is given in the literature (fresh or rehydrated) as 1–2 mm (Desmazières), up to 2 mm (White, Dennis), 1–2.5 mm (Arendholz), 1–3 mm (Breitenbach & Kränzlin), 1.5–3 mm (Boudier), or 2–4 mm (Srvček). Stipe length is reported as about 1–1.5(–2) mm. This is in concordance with our observations, and gives evidence that this species rarely exceeded 4 mm in diam. Only Patouillard indicated a larger size (3–5 mm), and also Kirisits and Kräutler (2013, fig. 1) observed diameters of up to 5 mm in a collection from the Bretagne. Hy. fraxineus may reach a size of about 8 mm as a maximum, but is often also found with rather small apothecia.

Online photos of Slovenian records under the name Hy. albidus (by N. Ogris, Ljubljana, http://www.zdravgozd.si/prirocnik/zapis.aspx?idso=319 – accessed 23 May 2014) show exceptionally long stipes with red-brown lower half. Possibly, the long stipes result from keeping the collection in a moist chamber in a dark room.

Stroma

A character which has all here treated species in common concerns the dark brown or black, melanized pseudosclerotial plate outside of the sclerenchyma of petioles, rachises, and veins that they inhabit. This stromatized host tissue was reported already in the type of Hy. albidus by Desmazières (1851), who thought that it might be an Asteroma, an anamorph connected mainly to members of the family Valsaceae (Diaporthales). However, there is no doubt that the stroma or pseudosclerotium belongs to the Hymenoscyphus.

Sections through petioles show that the apothecial initials are formed from mycelium inside the pseudosclerotia (Figures 3(a), 3(e), 8(f)). In pure culture on modified Seed agar medium, ‘at first a whitish-grey mycelium was formed, which changed soon to dark brown or black and pseudostromatic areas with a hard surface were developed’ (Pham et al. 2013, p. 447). Contrary to Svrček (1985), who stated that not all apothecia of Hy. albidus emerge from the blackened areas (‘epidermis’), we have never seen apothecia inserted on unblackened parts of the substrate in any of the here treated species.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is tmyc-5-228-g003.jpg

Hymenoscyphus albidus: a–c, e. median section of stipe base (with internal crystals) and cross section of pseudosclerotium in ash rachis (the black demarcation line is restricted to the border between cortical parenchyma and sclerenchyma, hyphae present in all tissues of petiole); d, f–g. external view on pseudosclerotial plate (tangential section of rachis surface), cells of cortical parenchyma and sclerenchyma densely filled with subhyaline hyphae (textura epidermoidea). – All in living state. – a–g. H.B. 9699 (FR-PC, Granzay-Gript).

What appears dark brown to black by macroscopical view is a thin layer (demarcation line or pseudosclerotial plate) in the outer region of the host tissue, which completely surrounds the infected parts beneath, and which separates them laterally from uninfected regions. This dark pigment of the pseudosclerotial plate completely fades when placed in eau de Javelle for about 5 min, as is generally observed with melanized pigments.

In all these foliicolous species, the pseudosclerotial plate develops beneath the epidermis within the large-celled cortical parenchyma, often at the border to the smaller-celled, thick-walled sclerenchyma. During winter the epidermis and cortical parenchyma and also the phloem are degraded and may entirely disappear (Figure 17(m)(n), 17(s)), but remnants of brown cortical parenchyma or phloem are partly still present when apothecia are formed (Figures 11(k), ,19).19). Only in rare cases the light-coloured epidermis can still be found loosely attached to the dark stroma beneath by covering large areas of the rachis (Figure 11(c)). The dark stromatic colour originates from black-brown hyphae that form a plectenchyma (textura epidermoidea) on both sides of the host cell walls of the large-celled cortical parenchyma and the outer cells of the sclerenchyma (Figure 3(e)). The lumina of the host cells are densely filled with hyaline or pale brown hyphae (Figures 3(d), 3(f)(g), 8(i)(k), 11(h)). The same is true in the host tissue below the apothecial stipe (Figures 3(a), 3(e), 18h). Cells of the sclerenchyma distant from the demarcation line are only sparsely filled with hyphae, lining the inner face of their walls (Figure 8(g), 18(i)).

In Hy. aesculi and Hy. vacini also the inner border of the sclerenchyma is frequently delimited by a black pseudosclerotial plate when viewed in cross section (Figures 17(m), 17(q)(s), 19(b), ,22).22). However, also those cells below the inner pseudosclerotial plate contain small amounts of hyphae.

Demarcation lines that delimit the pseudosclerotium from uninfected tissue are infrequently seen in Hy. albidus and Hy. fraxineus when studying cross-cuts of rachises. Especially when several infections took place within a single leaf, the black lines frequently cross outer or inner parts of the mark parenchyma (Figure 11(i)). Also Gross, Zaffarano et al. (2012) observed up to eight different infections and mating type locus (MAT) genotypes in a single rachis colonized by Hy. fraxineus, although it looked homogeneously blackened from outside. A limited (insular) pattern of pseudosclerotia more obviously permits to conclude that a multiple infection of a single rachis took place.

The present study suggests that differences in the extension of the pseudosclerotium occur between Hy. albidus and Hy. fraxineus. The apothecia of Hy. albidus often grow on sharply isolated (insular) black areas on the otherwise pale straw-coloured rachis, though in some specimens, including the type, the stroma covers a main part of the rachises. Hy. fraxineus often stains more or less the entire rachis of a leaf in black, or a major part of it, though also not rarely only insular areas. In Hy. aesculi more or less the entire petiole was found to be occupied by the pseudosclerotium.

Various literature reports of Hy. albidus account for this peculiarity by phrases such as ‘on blackened areas’ or ‘on blackened patches’ (White 1944; Dennis 1956, 1978; Arendholz 1979; Clark 1980; Breitenbach & Kränzlin 1981; Ellis & Ellis 1997). Also Patouillard’s (Patouillard 1885, pl. 382), Boudier’s (1908, pl. 492), and Gams and Arnold (2007, fig. 1A) illustrations show this insular pattern. The difference in the stroma between Hy. albidus and Hy. fraxineus is also recognizable on the two macrophotos of these species in Hietala and Solheim (2011). Likewise, on a photo of rachises from a montane locality without ash dieback in the Austrian Alps (Kirisits 2011, fig. 6), the partial blackening can clearly be seen, but these petioles were not genetically processed and their identity is uncertain. Overview photos of Hy. fraxineus show entirely blackened rachises in virtually all of the many illustrated papers on ash dieback (e.g., Engesser, Forster et al. 2009; Engesser, Meierb et al. 2009; Kirisits 2010; Metzler 2009, 2010; Solheim et al. 2011; Kowalski et al. 2013).

Above the black stipe base a constriction is often seen where it intergrades with the whitish main part of the stipe (Figures 7(n), 8(c), 8(f)). The black basal part of the stipe represents the primordium, from which the development of the stipe and later the receptacle starts. The primordia can be seen as minute blackish spikes on the stromatized rachises. Apparently they appear only in late spring shortly before apothecia are formed.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is tmyc-5-228-g006.jpg

Hymenoscyphus fraxineus (Europe). Apothecia emerging from black pseudosclerotia in rachises and veins of F. excelsior (n, p: in median/longitudinal/cross section). – All in fresh state. – a–b. H.B. 9700 (DE-BW, Tübingen); c, e. 23.VI.2011 (DE-BW, Heidelberg, Ziegelhausen); d. 28.V.2011 (ibid.), f. 17.VI.2011 (Tübingen); g. H.B. 9560 (DE-BW, Reutlingen); h. 30.VI.2012 (BE-LUX, Arlon, phot. G. Marson); i. 23.VI.2012 (Heidelberg, Lobbach); j, m. 18.VII.2011 (DE-TH, Sonneberg, phot. I. Wagner); k. 15.VII.2011 (Ziegelhausen); l, n, p. H.B. 9698 (Tübingen); o. 10.VII.2011 (Heidelberg, Boxberg).

The black pseudosclerotial plate is not yet present when the wilted leaves fall to ground in autumn but is formed prior to the winter season (see Gross & Holdenrieder 2013). Since the fallen rachises lie loosely on the forest floor, they completely dry down during dry weather. The authors found that the mycelium in the pseudosclerotia survives at least 92 days in the dry state, while in nature under repeated drying and rewetting the pseudosclerotia can endure at least 2 years.

Croziers and simple septa

Differences in the ascogenous hyphae among closely related species play an important role in the taxonomy of ascomycetes. A couple of papers have drawn attention to this peculiarity, such as Huhtinen (1990) for Hyaloscypha, Baral (1996, p. 255) and Hengstmengel (1996, p. 192) for Hymenoscyphus. Nevertheless, croziers and simple septa are still being frequently neglected in many groups.

Literature reports on the mode of ascus base development in Hymenoscyphus species with a pseudosclerotium are sparse. According to White’s (1944, p. 608, figs. 1924) precise illustration of Pl. Crypt. N. France, éd. I. n° 2004 (FH), the asci in the lectotype of Hy. albidus arise from simple septa. White’s statement ‘not originating from croziers’ in the description allows to assume that he saw this feature also in the examined isolectotype collection in FH (éd. II. n° 1604). Besides Arendholz (1979), White’s report is the only known to us from the past century, which mentions the type of ascus development in this species.

V. Ruiz-Badanelli (in Hairaud 2010) and Zhao et al. (2013) presented photographs of croziers of Hy. fraxineus (as Hy. pseudoalbidus). Hairaud gave also a photo of the simple-septate ascus base in Hy. albidus for his collection from July 2012, following personal communication with H.O. Baral. However, his note that he saw the feature also in the 2007 sample must be in error. A statement by Otto and Wagner (2011) about the difference in the ascus base between the two species originates also from such personal communication with the first author of the present paper.

Hy. honshuanus (≡Lambertellinia scutuloides) is here found to possess croziers (Figure 12(b)), although the protologue states the contrary. Korf and Lizoň (1994) observation was not accompanied by an illustration; however, it remains open whether this observation was erroneous, or the type collection represented a mixtum.

Homothallism, monokaryon, relative DNA content of nuclei

The cytological background of the presence vs. absence of croziers is still little understood. In Hy. albidus the absence of croziers is correlated with homothallism and with the absence of an anamorph state (see below under ‘Anamorph and life cycle’ section). Data on the karyological situation in the ascogenous hyphae of the here treated pseudosclerotium-forming species of Hymenoscyphus were presently not available.

Berkson (1966) observed in Chaetomium that species with croziers had dikaryotic ascogenous hyphae whereas others with simple septa were monokaryotic. Also Weber (1992, p. 68) observed monokaryotic ascogenous hyphae in species of Helotiales that lack croziers, although only in a smaller part of them, while in others monokaryotic and dikaryotic cells occurred mixed in the same ascogenous system. Nuclei of monokaryotic cells thereby had the double DNA content compared to those of dikaryotic cells of the same species. In species in which the ascogenous hyphae possess croziers, Weber observed mainly dikaryotic cells. Zickler et al. (1995) reported ‘uninucleate croziers’ in mutant strains of Podospora anserina which normally were dikaryotic. However, their microphotos (Figure 4(a)(d)) show simple-septate ascogenous hyphae with a partial presence of hook-like protuberances which did not fuse with the cells below. The complete croziers drawn for the uninucleate mutants on their diagrammatic survey (Figure 5(b)(c)) are not seen on their micrographs.

In her study on the relative DNA content of nuclei in vegetative cells, Weber (1992) revealed for Hy. albidus a value of 4× of the basic value (1×), the lowest found in the Helotiales. Within Hymenoscyphus, this value of 4× was not rarely encountered in her study (e.g., in He. scutula and Hy. vacini), but values of 2×, 3×, 6×, and rarely 1× also occurred. A correlation of these values with the presence or absence of croziers could not be established; however, species with croziers as well as simple septa occurred in quite equal frequency within each value, except for those species with values of 1× (simple-septate) and 2× (croziers), which were too sparsely encountered in order to draw a conclusion. In any case, it would be interesting to measure the relative DNA content of the two so far not investigated species of Hymenoscyphus with a pseudosclerotium, Hy. fraxineus and Hy. aesculi. A survey on the known genome size values in fungi are found in Kullman et al. (2005).

A correlation between croziers and apothecial size similar as in Hy. albidus and Hy. fraxineus was noted in two further species pairs of the Helotiales (Baral in Weber 1992, p. 110, 118): (1) Calycina herbarum (without croziers) and C. aff. herbarum (with croziers and larger apothecia), a very similar species which was currently confused with Ca. herbarum, and which inhabits a comparable spectrum of herbaceous stems; (2) Heyderia pusilla (without croziers, on needles of Pinus) and Hy. cucullata (=Hy. abietis, with croziers and larger fruit bodies, on needles of Picea). Within both species pairs the relative DNA content did not differ (Calycina 2×, Heyderia 6×).

Apical ring

The morphology of the ascus apical thickening in the dead expanded state when stained with iodine is usually very similar among the true members of the large genus Hymenoscyphus. Its characteristic morphology was addressed by Baral (in Baral & Krieglsteiner 1985, p. 119), and later referred to as Hymenoscyphus-type (Baral 1987, p. 126, fig. 1012, Verkley 1993). The ascus apex in the Sclerotiniaceae and Rutstroemiaceae (Sclerotinia-type) sharply differs hereof and easily permits distinction with the light microscope between sclerotiniaceous/rutstroemiaceous and hymenoscyphoid taxa in most cases (see Baral 1987). White (1944) and Svrček (1985) illustrated the Hymenoscyphus-type of apical ring in Hy. albidus. However, it was perhaps more because of a similar spore shape that White believed in a very close relationship to He. scutula and Hy. caudatus.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is tmyc-5-228-g009.jpg

Hymenoscyphus fraxineus (Europe). a1, b, c, d1, e1, g, h3. ascospores (freshly ejected, containing LBs); h4. do. (LBs deteriorated); a2, j. paraphyses (containing VBs); e2, i, k. mature asci; f, h1. overmature ascospores (septate, partly with olive-brown wall); u. ascus apices with euamyloid apical ring; remaining figures: ascogenous hyphae with crozier formation. – Living state: a1–e1, a2, f1, g (in Waterman blue-black ink), h1, h3, i, j (in CRB), k1, r–s, v; dead state: k2 (in H2O), a3–a4, d2–d4, h2 (in CR); e2–e3, l–n, p–q (in CRSDS), f2 (in KOH), o, t (in KOH+CR), h4 (in ethanol + KOH + phloxine), u1–u2 (in IKI). – a. 28.V.2011 (DE-BW, Heidelberg, Ziegelhausen), b. H.B. 9572 (CH-LU, Emmenbrücke), c. H.B. 8220 (DE-ST, Chemnitz), d. 31.VII.2011 (Heidelberg, Schönbrunn), e. 10.VII.2011 (Heidelberg, Boxberg), f. H.B. 9593 (Chemnitz), g. 14.VII.2012 (Heidelberg), h. 23.VII.2011 (DE-BW, Speyer, Böhl-Iggelheim), i. 15.VII.2011 (Ziegelhausen), j. H.B. 9599 (DE-BW, Tübingen), k. H.B. 8509 (DK-Sjaelland, Sorø), l. 18.VII.2011 (DE-TH, Sonneberg), m. 2.VII.2011 (Heidelberg, Handschuhsheim), n. 5.VII.2011 (Ziegelhausen), o. ZT 3298 (CH-BE, Belp), p. 23.VI.2011 (Ziegelhausen), q. 23.VI.2012 (Heidelberg, Lobbach), r. H.B. 9698 (Tübingen), s. H.B. 9700 (Tübingen), t. ZT 3297 (CH-BE, Burgdorf), u. 8.VII.2011 (Sonneberg), v. H.B. 9583 (Tübingen). – Phot. l1–3, u1–2: I. Wagner.

Ascospore size and shape

Heteropolar, subapically rounded and with a lateral hook-like protrusion, basally ± pointed ascospores are typical of many of the true members of Hymenoscyphus. This characteristic spore type was called ‘scutuloid’ by Baral (in Baral & Krieglsteiner 1985) according to the situation in the representative species He. scutula, but was rarely also referred to as virguliformis, which means in Latin comma-shaped, e.g., by Patouillard (1885, p. 173), who erroneously wrote in French ‘spores virgultiformes’ instead of ‘virguliformes’. The spore size in the type material of Hy. albidus was given as minimum 15 µm by Desmazières, 11–17 × 3.5–4 µm by Nylander (1868), 15–18 × 3.5–4 µm by Karsten (1871), 15–18 × 3–4 µm by Massee (1895), and 13–17 × 4–5 µm by White (1944).

Hy. fraxineus is said to have slightly longer ascospores, but variation and overlap in this feature forbid recognition of the two species on Fraxinus from spore length alone. Queloz et al. (2011) gave a graphic representation of length values of some selected specimens. Accordingly, spore length ranges were (11–)13–14–16–17(–18) µm in Hy. albidus and (15–)16–17–18–20(–22) µm in Hy. fraxineus, both possibly evaluated from dead spores. The tendency to longer spores in Hy. fraxineus is confirmed from the specimens studied by us. Our spore length values are about 0.5–1 µm over those of Queloz et al. (2011), probably because of a slight shrinking effect between living and dead spores. The longest freshly ejected spores that we measured in Hy. fraxineus were almost 25 µm long.

The characteristic spore shape of Hy. aesculi with a swollen middle part is only present when living spores are studied in a water mount. After releasing the spore turgor by heating or applying killing agents, the spores shrink and more or less completely loose this inflation (see Figure 18(n)(o)). Also inside the turgescent asci, the spores are distinctly narrower and less swollen in their middle part because of the ascus turgor. When discharged in a water mount, the spores swell to their typical shape within a few seconds.

Ascospore contents

Published illustrations of living spores of the here presented species are rather rare. Particularly freshly ejected living spores, but also those inside fully turgescent asci, show a regular pattern of larger and smaller oil drops (LBs). Hy. albidus, Hy. fraxineus, and Hy. aesculi possess quite the same pattern of rather large, globose LBs (2–3.5 µm diam. in Hy. albidus and Hy. fraxineus, 1.5–2.5 µm in Hy. aesculi), about 1–4 in each half, surrounded by small ones. The spores of Hy. vacini consistently contain only medium-sized LBs (~1–2 µm diam.) among many small ones.

Patouillard’s (1885, pl. 382) drawing, though rather small and inexact, appears to be almost the only published documentation of living mature ascospores within the Hy. albidus aggregate, showing about four rather large globose drops in each spore. Two recent illustrations of living spores are found in Hairaud (2010) and Gross, Holdenrieder et al. (2014, fig. 1h). Even Boudier (1908, pl. 492), who consequently studied ascomycetes in the fresh state, illustrated the living spores of Hy. albidus with only small- to medium-sized drops, the latter about 1.2–1.8 µm diam., though with a rather regular pattern. Perhaps theses spores were not fully mature.

The original lipid pattern can often also be observed in herbarium material, but it requires caution to select those spores which possess enough maturity, and to avoid all those which are overmature or in which the LBs have fused to irregular aggregations. Actually, most reports in the literature concern dead spores that contain irregular rather variably shaped aggregations.

Ascospore reports such as ‘often with a large oil globule’ (Dennis 1956, p. 93) or ‘often with 1–3 oil drops’ (Arendholz 1979, p. 80) are due to fusion of the original oil drops during the influence of lethal mountants or the natural death of spores. Surprisingly, White’s 1944, fig. 24) drawing of the type of Hy. albidus shows a rather regular spore content with a ‘granular’, multiguttulate sporoplasm, the largest LBs exceeding not even 1 µm diam. This is astonishing, since oil drops usually fuse in dead material, but never split into small ones. The explanation for this appears to be that White (1943, p. 137) followed a method described by Martin (1934, p. 264), who placed fungal fragments in alcohol before applying KOH and phloxine. We made a test with a specimen of Hy. fraxineus: the large oil drops in the spores indeed disappeared and only the small ones remained visible. Apparently it is the alcohol that dissolves the large oil drops (see Figure 10(h3)→(h4)).

Ascospore sheath and setulae

Distinct setulae at the spore ends were not observed in any of the species treated here, while a delicate sheath around ejected spores was occasionally seen, though not yet in Hy. honshuanus and Hy. vacini. Because of its fragile nature, it is a rarely reported structure. When studying herbarium material, it remains inevitably undetected since it does not detach from the wall when dead spores are rehydrated, due to the absence of cell turgor. The sheath can only be observed when the spores are ejected from living asci in a water mount: after discharge, they rapidly take up water and swell, and the inelastic sheath bursts and eventually floats besides the spores. Gross, Holdenrieder et al. (2014, fig. 1m–n) reported a thick, hyaline to pale brown mucilage secreted from the spores of Hy. fraxineus, by which they are thought to adhere to the leaf surface after wind dispersal. This mucilage was observed on overmature (1-septate or brown) spores during. In fact, the mature spores are hyaline and aseptate during ejection, and soon dehydrated after dispersal, including their mucilage. Possibly the sheath observed by us covers a thin mucilage that gets more abundant during germination and affixes the spore to the leaf when the appressorium is formed.

Overmature ascospores, pigmentation

Apparently all true members of Hymenoscyphus eject hyaline, non-septate ascospores. However, at an overmature stage of development, the spores frequently get 1(–2)-septate and their wall may turn pale to light brown and often also warted. Because brown or septate spores of a Hymenoscyphus are never forcibly ejected, such spores in this genus can only be found inside dead asci or outside asci, but never inside living asci (see also Baral 1992, p. 375).

The presence of pigmented spores has been overestimated as a generic character in the Helotiales. As pointed out by Galán and Baral (1997, p. 61) and Hengstmengel (2009, p. 271), this feature of overmature spores is quite a common character in Hymenoscyphus, though it is seen only inconsistently and sometimes very rarely in a given species. The proportion of brown spores in a preparation depends on the senescence of the apothecia. For some reason, perhaps unfavourable field conditions, some populations produce many such brown spores when senescent, while in others none or only a few can be found.

Spore germination is observed in both hyaline and brown spores. Possibly, the hyaline spores directly infect the living leaves, whereas the brown spores are resting spores being able to survive a longer time. Brown germinating spores were figured by Hosoya et al. (1993) for Hy. fraxineus (as Lam. albida), and by Kowalski and Holdenrieder (2009, fig. 1g). In the present study, brown spores were only two times seen in Hy. fraxineus (Figure 10(f)), once in Hy. honshuanus, and once in Hy. aesculi.

Ectal excipulum

In sections of living specimens of Hy. albidus, the ectal excipulum is a textura prismatica with comparatively thin though slightly gelatinized walls. In dead specimens, or when adding killing agents such as KOH, the cells shrink especially in width, and the gel between the walls becomes more obvious due to imbibition. The shrinking effect was probably the reason why Svrček (1985) found the cells to be only 4–5 µm wide, though he obviously did not see any gelatinization. Likewise, Arendholz (1979), who classified the ectal excipulum of Hy. albidus as a t. intricata, did not see glassy or agglutinated cell walls. White (1944, fig. 22) found the excipular cells in the lectotype 8–10(–15) µm wide, but did not mention or clearly figure a gel between the cell walls.

In Hy. fraxineus strong variation in the width of the excipular cells was noted, which appears to depend mainly on the development stage: in younger apothecia the ectal excipulum forms a t. prismatica-porrecta in both stipe and receptacle, with a cell width of *~6–10 µm, whereas in older and larger apothecia it forms a t. prismatica-angularis with *~10–30 µm wide cells.

Hair-like protrusions

Svrček (1985) mentioned the outside of the receptacle of Hy. albidus to be finely downy, the stipe almost tomentose in the lower part. Also Dennis (1956, p. 94) described and illustrated ‘short, slender, obtuse hairs about 10–15 × 2 µm’ on the excipular surface in this species. We here describe them in Hy. albidus and Hy. fraxineus (Figure 9(l)(m)), but saw a pubescent stipe also in Hy. aesculi. These protrusions were not present in each of the studied samples of these species, however.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is tmyc-5-228-g008.jpg

Hymenoscyphus fraxineus (Europe): a–b, j–o. median section of stipe, showing golden-yellow external exudate and black basal stroma (ee = ectal excipulum, me = medullary excipulum); c–d. median section of receptacle at flanks (c) and margin (d); e–f. surface view of stipe; g–i, k. crystals in medullary excipulum near stipe base; k–n. hairs at stipe base. – All in living state (i: under polarized light). – a, g, k, l–n. H.B. 9593 (DE-SN, Chemnitz); b. H.B. 9698 (DE-BW, Tübingen); c, h–i. H.B. 9700 (Tübingen); d. H.B. 9571 (CH-LU, Hitzkirch); e–f. H.B. 9583 (Tübingen); j, o. H.B. 9589 (DE-BY, Amberg).

Vacuolar bodies

In all here treated species of Hymenoscyphus, refractive vacuolar bodies (VBs) occupy most of the lumen of the terminal cells of the living paraphyses and partly also of the cortical cells of the marginal ectal excipulum. In young paraphyses, they are globose or somewhat angular, but soon fuse and finally form very elongate vacuoles (see also Baral 1992, p. 363). In the dead state, they are distorted or entirely disappeared. Also KOH applied to living paraphyses irreversibly makes them disappear (Baral 1992), and that without provoking any colour reaction. Staining agents when added to a water mount, provoke a distinct stain to VBs: CRB slowly stains them turqoise, and IKI light yellowish to bright red-brown. In IKI mounts, many minute red-brown granules may extrude into the surrounding medium, but this effect was only inconsistently obtained in Hy. albidus, Hy. fraxineus, and Hy. vacini, and not in Hy. aesculi.

A colour change of the VBs from hyaline towards olivaceous-brown was repeatedly noted in Hy. aesculi, resulting in partially blackish-brown hymenia in herbarium material. In the other species studied, the VBs turned merely yellowish-cream with age. The phenomenon appears to be due to an oxidative chemical process.

Crystals

Arendholz (1979) observed abundant crystals of ‘presumably Calcium oxalate’ in the lower 1/4 of the stipe. We have regularly seen these crystals in both Hy. albidus (Figure 3(c)) and Hy. fraxineus (Figures 8(d)(e), 9(h)(i), (k)), and Zheng and Zhuang (2014) report them for Hy. fraxineus and Hy. albidoides. Although crystals occur also inside some of the cells of the infected rachises, those found in the dense tissue of the medullary excipulum of the stipe base are undoubtedly formed by the fungus, not by the host.

The crystals are hyaline, ±rhomboid, and frequently aggregated in druses. They are KOH-inert and do not stain with CRB or IKI. Under polarized light, they are birefringent by changing the direction of the light for about 90° (Figure 9(i)). Crystals occur also in the living rachises of Fraxinus, inside cells of the radial rays between the vascular bundles. However, these are not arranged in druses. Crystals were not observed in Hy. aesculi and Hy. vacini, nor in any other species of Hymenoscyphus examined by us.

Anamorph and life cycle

Hy. fraxineus is heterothallic and produces a Chalara anamorph in pure culture, whereas the avirulent Hy. albidus is homothallic (Gross, Zaffarano et al. 2012) and not associated with an asexual state (Kirisits et al. 2013; Kirisits & Kräutler 2013); also it displays slower growth on agar media.

Various authors have shown that the conidia of Ch. fraxinea do not germinate. Their perhaps exclusive function as spermatia was suggested by various authors, including Gross, Zaffarano et al. (2012; see also Gross, Holdenrieder et al. (2014)), whereas distribution seems to be exclusively accomplished by ascospores. The whole life cycle from leaf infection via ascospores to production of apothecia lasts only 1 year (Gross, Zaffarano et al. 2012, fig. 5). Yet, the pseudosclerotia in the fallen leaves may produce apothecia also in the second year (Gross & Holdenrieder 2013). Moreover, seeds of Fraxinus may contribute to dispersal: in 8.3% of the investigated seeds DNA of Hy. fraxineus could be detected (Cleary et al. 2012).

According to Gross, Zaffarano et al. (2012), the formation of spermatia in Hy. fraxineus is linked to the heterothallism of that species. The authors found that Hy. fraxineus needs different mating types in order to produce apothecia, whereas Hy. albidus is homothallic (self-fertile) and able to fruit from a single-spore mycelium (A. Gross personal communication). Because of its homothallism, we assume that Hy. albidus does not require complex mechanisms of nuclear division during the dicaryophase which result in the formation of croziers in Hy. fraxineus.

The situation in Hy. fraxineus/Hy. albidus raises the question whether also in other species of Hymenoscyphus the presence/absence of an anamorph is linked to the presence/absence of croziers. Chalara anamorphs have virtually been unknown in that genus before the connection was established by Kowalski and Holdenrieder (2009). Unpublished observations of a Chalara asexual morph in four species with asci arising consistently from croziers support this correlation. Two of them were observed in ascospore isolates by E. Weber: (1) hyaline phialides in a species close to Phaeohelotium imberbe (H.B. 7469); (2) light olivaceous phialides in Hymenoscyphus infarciens (H.B. 7025a, CBS 122016). The other two concern hyaline to pale brown phialides emerging from the ectal excipulum at the flanks of the receptacle (Baral in preparation): (3) in the lectotype of Hy. subferrugineus; (4) in a specimen identified as Hy. calyculus (H.B. 3128). Hy. linearis, however, a species with simple-septate asci, was found to produce a Chalara asexual state in culture.

Conidia of Hy. fraxineus are abundantly produced during autumn and winter on recently infected rachises, after leaf fall at low temperatures, preferentially near pseudosclerotial plates (Kowalski & Bartnik 2010; Gross, Holdenrieder et al. 2014). The pale to light olivaceous-brown phialides have a size of (13–)15–24(–28) × 3.5–5(–5.7) µm, with a 7–10(–12.5) µm long and (2.1–)2.5–3.1 µm wide collarette, and the phialoconidia measure *3–4(–4.2) × (1.7–)2–2.3(–2.5) µm, the first formed conidia being much more elongate, *(5–)6–7(–9) × (1.7–)2–2.5(–2.8) µm (Kowalski 2006; Floreancig 2009; Ogris et al. 2009; Flajšman 2011; Shabunin et al. 2012).

Size of conidiophores (13.5–18.5 × 4–5.5 µm) and conidia (2.5–3 × 1.5–2 µm) as given by Hosoya et al. (1993) for Japanese material is at the lower end of the range, except for the inflated basal part of the conidiophores which are more inflated (ventricose).

Remarks on ecological aspects of the two treated species on Fraxinus

Altitude

Apothecia of Hy. albidus were recorded in the region of the Alps up to an altitude of 1690 m as indicated by the sample from Giswil (Switzerland, NMLU 2309-80) made in 1980 (Queloz et al. 2011). Before Hy. fraxineus started its invasion, Hy. albidus showed a wide but scattered distribution in lowland regions of Europe, where it became nowadays extinct, except in those regions of Western and Southwestern Europe which have not yet been invaded. In 2009 Hy. albidus was still present in montane regions of Switzerland, according to Queloz et al. (2011): in southern parts of the country at altitudes of 600–1075 m only Hy. albidus could be found, whereas Hy. fraxineus was in that year exclusively present in the northern lowlands at 345–570 m, although some Hy. albidus records were made also there at altitudes of 508–695 m.

Kirisits (2011, fig. 5) presented for Hy. fraxineus a map of Eastern Tyrol (Austria), with records of ash dieback by July 2010 at elevations of about 650–720 m in the Drava valley near Lienz, whereas the disease did at that time not yet occur in other parts of Eastern Tyrol, including localities at higher elevations (e.g., in the Gail valley). However, observations made in 2014 indicate that apothecia or dieback symptoms occurred already at 1120 m in the Prättigau (Graubünden, H.O. Baral), at 1130 m in the Hürital (Rosalmig, Zug, U. Graf personal communication), at 1150 m in the Gesäuse National Park (Ennstaler Alpen) and 1300 m in Kärnten (G. Koller personal communication), and at up to 1600 m in the Virgental (Eastern Tyrol) at the uppermost altitudinal limit of F. excelsior (T. Kirisits personal communication). This suggests that Hy. albidus is threatened in the entire distribution range of ash in Central Europe. In Eastern Asia the observed maximum altitudinal records of Hy. fraxineus were 1325 m in Japan, 1100 m in South Korea, and 1310 m in Northeast China (Jilin).

Host range

Within Europe, Hy. fraxineus was recorded, apart from the European temperate species F. excelsior, also on the North American F. nigra (Estonia, Drenkhan and Hanso 2010) and on two submediterranean species from Southern and Southeastern Europea, F. angustifolia and F. ornus. Artificial wound inoculation experiments revealed an equally high or slightly higher susceptibility of F. angustifolia to Hy. fraxineus compared to F. excelsior (Matlakova 2009). When inoculated, the fungus also caused symptoms on F. ornus, though less intensely than on the two other species (Matlakova 2009, Gross, Holdenrieder et al. 2014). However, ash dieback symptoms due to natural infections have so far never been observed on flowering ash, neither on woody parts nor on leaves, and this species may be resistant to the fungus (Gross, Holdenrieder et al. 2014; T. Kirisits personal communication). Gross, Holdenrieder et al. (2014) reported the occurrence of apothecia of Hy. fraxineus on petioles of F. ornus, which may indicate that it occurs endophytically in leaves of this ash species.

F. nigra was badly affected with symptoms, F. pennsylvanica only moderately, and F. americana and F. mandshurica were least affected (Drenkhan & Hanso 2010). In its presently known original area of Eastern Asia, the hosts of Hy. fraxineus are F. mandshurica and F. rhynchophylla (partly treated as a subspecies of F. chinensis).

Hy. albidus is known with certainty only from F. excelsior and sometimes F. angustifolia. For two here mentioned records on Acer, voucher specimens have not been preserved. A preserved specimen on a leaf of ‘Pyrus’ from Belgium was found to grow in fact on Fraxinus. Misidentifications of either host or fungus explain in some cases a seemingly wide host spectrum.

Similarly narrow host spectra are noted in the genus Rutstroemia. The common Rutstroemia longipes is said to be confined to rachises of Fraxinus in North America (R.P. Korf personal communication), and the closely related Rutstroemia luteovirescens is frequent on petioles of Acer in Europe. However, the independence of these two fungal species and the extent of their host spectra have been questioned in the past (see above).

Fruiting on twigs

As an exception, both Hy. albidus and Hy. fraxineus were found fruiting on twigs of Fraxinus in the present study, though in both cases also petioles were inhabited. The record of Hy. albidus (Echternach, LUX 047701) concerns a corticated 1 mm thick twig with blackened bark, while in that of Hy. fraxineus (Luzern, H.B. 9571) the apothecia grew on blackened wood of an almost entirely decorticated, 5.5 mm thick twig. The rare occurrence of Hy. fraxineus on twigs was repeatedly reported, e.g., by Gross, Holdenrieder et al. (2014, fig. 1d). The rareness of this behaviour is astonishing, since living twigs are regularly invaded by the fungus. Whether also Hy. albidus is able to invade living woody parts is not known.

Phenology

The slightly earlier production of apothecia of Hy. fraxineus in comparison with Hy. albidus is shown in Table 4, based on the specimens listed in our collection data. Literature data suggest that Hy. albidus occurred also in October (e.g., Krieglsteiner 1999, p. 238, 30.X.1997, near Schweinfurt). A fruiting period of Hy. fraxineus during May–October(–November) was demonstrated by Chandelier et al. (2014, fig. 4) using spore traps and real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). This earlier start of fruiting plays a role in the dominance of the pathogen over Hy. albidus.

Table 4.

Phenology of Hy. albidus (35 collections) and Hy. fraxineus (55 collections) within Europe, based mainly on data in Tables 1 and and2.2. Indicated is the number of collections for each species.

 May 1May 2June 1June 2July 1July 2Aug. 1Aug. 2Sept. 1Sept. 2Oct. 1Oct. 2
Hy. albidus2487573
Hy. fraxineus321015156772

Distribution and replacement

The presently known original distribution of Hy. fraxineus is shown in Figure 24. Whether it covers the entire natural area of its known host trees F. mandshurica and F. rhynchophylla is not known. The original distribution of Hy. albidus appears to comprise all more or less temperate to montane but also oromediterranean regions of Europe, where F. excelsior or F. angustifolia occur. A rather dense distribution at least in Central and Western Europe is evident, based on the presently available data (Figure 23).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is tmyc-5-228-g020.jpg

Distribution of Hymenoscyphus albidus within Europe according to trustable records known to us (those for which data about the host and the presence of a stroma were not available are omitted, also all those doubtful records which fall in the period of invasion by Hy. fraxineus).

Hy. fraxineus is a neomycete within Europe and threatens other fungi in that ecological niche similarly as introduced plants do with the native vegetation. Our estimation is that particularly host-specific fungi such as Hy. albidus or Cy. fraxinophila are severely threatened by the invasive fungus.

The area-wide extinction of Hy. albidus within Central Europe from ca. 2000 onwards is obvious, due to the mass colonization of the rachises by Hy. fraxineus. As a matter of fact, the species could not be discovered anymore in several countries of Central, Northern, and Eastern Europe, the last known records dating from ca. 1990–2008 (see also below and Figure 23). The species could so far maintain only in high-montane areas, e.g., in the Alps, and in lowlands outside the present distribution area of Hy. fraxineus, particularly in the southwestern part of France. A history of the spread of Hy. fraxineus along with the extinction of Hy. albidus is given, e.g., by Bakys (2013) and Vasaitis (2013).

Cy. fraxinophila fruited quite abundantly in late autumn (IX–XII) all over Central Europe. A total of 36 records in the first author’s database refer to the period 1975–1995, whereas only two concern later years (2006 and 2009, Mecklenburg). Despite a thorough search for the species, it could not be collected in the last years in the area of Tübingen. However, O. Koukol (personal communication) observed Cy. fraxinophila in 2013 at several sites within Czechia, although Hy. albidus disappeared there during the invasion by Hy. fraxineus. It can be assumed that Hy. fraxineus does not infect all living leaves of an ash tree, so there probably remain enough uninfected leaves that fall to the ground during autumn. Infection of these leaves by Cy. fraxinophila is assumed to take place on the ground during the spore discharge period in Sept.–Dec.

The predicted decline of the European ash might also affect lignicolous and other fungi. Jönsson and Thor (2012) discussed the extinction risk for the epiphytic lichen diversity on bark of living ash trees, with 174 species recorded on the island of Gotland (Sweden).

Historical records and present distribution of Hymenoscyphus albidus and Hymenoscyphus fraxineus

When excluding misidentifications, Hy. albidus was predominantly considered as rare in earlier times. The species was sometimes regarded as common, particularly in England and France, but some of these records concern misidentifications on substrates other than Fraxinus. Hy. fraxineus existed originally only in Eastern Asia (Japan, Korea, northeast of China, and far east of Russia). The first records of apothecia within Europe known to us were made in 1999 in Lithuania. With the invasion by Hy. fraxineus, Hy. albidus became extinct in most regions of Europe (see Figure 23).

Japan

Apothecia recorded in Japan on blackened rachises of Fraxinus mandshurica var. japonica were identified as Lam. albida by Hosoya et al. (1993). The very detailed documentation includes a pure culture and an anamorph which fits very well Ch. fraxinea. A sequence (ITS and part of SSU) was deposited at the NBCR (National Biological Resource Center) of the Japanese National Institute of Technology and Evaluation under the number NBRC102368 and was, therefore, overlooked by European researchers. After re-examination of eight specimens collected during 1990–2011, these were found to possess croziers at the ascus base in each of the apothecia tested (see Table 2). Five of these were sequenced and confirmed to belong to Hy. fraxineus (Zhao et al. 2013).

Korea

J.G. Han (personal communication) examined 10 records on rachises of Fraxinus mandshurica and F. rhynchophylla morphologically, four of them also genetically. All were found by him to possess croziers, and his sequences refer them to Hy. fraxineus.

China (northeast)

Zheng and Zhuang (2014) recorded Hy. fraxineus on F. mandshurica at four localities in the northeast of China (Jilin province). The authors observed croziers at the ascus base, and their sequences refer these records to Hy. fraxineus.

Russia (far east)

A collection of Hy. fraxineus from Kedrovaya Pad Reserve (Khasansky District, Primorsky Kray) on F. mandshurica was made in 17.VIII.2005 by E. Popov (personal communication), identified by the presence of croziers (1508-8-Ked). Marčiulynienė et al. (2013) confirmed the presence of Hy. fraxineus from three sites near Primorye by molecular methods.

Russia (westernmost part)

Records of Hy. albidus were made by E. Popov (personal communication) during 2004–2006 from Leningrad Oblast, e.g., from two islands in the Gulf of Finland. Moreover, several finds from Pskov (1998–2009) and one from Kaluga Oblast (2013) were made by him, as well as one from Novgorod Oblast (Valdaysky district, 4.IX.2001, Popov 2005). All these were re-examined by him recently and the absence of croziers was confirmed (documentation not seen). E. Popov observed that Hy. albidus fruited usually very abundantly, and almost everywhere in stands where Fraxinus grows. Only in the Volga-Akhtuba floodplain, where F. pennsylvanica was very commonly introduced, he did not observe Hy. albidus.

In a forest with Alnus incana and F. excelsior in Pskov Oblast visited by E. Popov every year since 1996, with Hy. albidus being common, no symptoms of disease were obvious until 2009 when all ash trees showed strong dieback, all dying after 1 or 2 years, also in several similar communities within a radius of 5 km. Other regions (Kaluga and Orel Oblast) did not show the disease so far. Shabunin et al. (2012) recorded Hy. fraxineus southwest of St. Petersburg (Leningrad Oblast) in 2012 by molecular methods.

Poland

Several records of Hy. albidus can be found in Polish publications. For instance, Lisiewska and Bujakiewicz (1976, p. 57) mentioned a specimen (as He. robergei) for the Dębina reserve in Wielkopolska (Central Poland), and Bujakiewicz (2001, p. 116) reported Hy. albidus from the Ostrów Panieński reserve close to Chełmno (Northern Poland) collected during 1981–1984. Molecular data have not been gained from these specimens, but the occurrence on blackened rachises prior to ca. 1990 leaves little doubt about their identity.

Ash dieback symptoms are known from Northern Poland since 1992 (Kowalski 2006), and since 1998 decline of F. excelsior occurred all over the country (Vasaitis 2013). Nevertheless, apothecia were noticed as part of the disease only since 2008 (Kowalski & Holdenrieder 2009). During surveys in 2005–2006 and 2011, Hy. fraxineus had totally replaced Hy. albidus, according to molecular analyses of 230 apothecia-derived cultures which all represented Hy. fraxineus (Kraj et al. 2012; Kowalski et al. 2013).

Lithuania

Six herbarium specimens under the name Hy. albidus, collected on blackened petioles of F. excelsior from the districts of Kėdainiai and Vilnius in 1999–2002, were recently reviewed by E. Kutorga (personal communication). He could demonstrate the presence of croziers by microphotos in all of them. The distribution of ‘Hy. albidus’ in Lithuania based on specimens (not tested for croziers) and literature data was reported by Treigienė et al. (2010) for the districts of Kėdainiai, Ukmergė and Biržai during field trips in 1997–2005, but these observations most likely also concern Hy. fraxineus.

The ash dieback disease was noticed since about 1996/97 (Juodvalkis & Vasiliauskas 2002), mainly in Biržai and Panevėžys districts (Northern Lithuania), Kėdainiai, Jonava and Ukmergė districts (Central Lithuania, see also Stepanenkova (2010) and Bakys (2013)). In the following years it spread over the whole country. A DNA sequence that matches Hy. fraxineus (AY787704) was for the first time gained in 2001 by Lygis et al. (2005, as Hymenoscyphus sp. 970, later corrected to Ch. fraxinea in GenBank, V. Lygis/E. Kutorga personal communication) from a stem base of F. excelsior in Biržai district (northeast of Lithuania). Mass production of apothecia was noticed by E. Kutorga from about 1999 onwards including 2013.

Estonia and Latvia

Rytkönen et al. (2011) isolated Ch. fraxinea from F. excelsior in 2008 in NW- and SE-Estonia and in 2009 in W-Latvia. Also Drenkhan and Hanso (2010) isolated the fungus in 2009 in SE-Estonia. However, the first indications of ash dieback were as early as 1995 in the northwest of Estonia, where the disease reached most ash stands during 2003, and from where it spread towards the southeast of the country during 2006–2007 (Drenkhan et al. 2014, fig. 4). Also in Latvia massive ash dieback occurred since mid-1995s (Vasaitis 2013).

Finland

Karsten (1871, p. 112) stated that collections from his country were unknown to him. The first record of Ch. fraxinea was in 2007 and 2008 in the SW-part of the country (Åland archipelago and mainland), from where the disease spread towards the southeast. The first symptoms of ash disease were in 2000 in the Åland archipelago (Rytkönen et al. 2011).

Sweden

Hy. albidus is known from a single locality near Helsingborg in Skåne (south of Sweden), where it was abundant in 1994 and 1996 (S.Å. Hanson personal communication). The first observation of the disease was in 2001, and in 2004 the entire distribution area of F. excelsior in the south of Sweden was affected (Timmermann et al. 2011). A frequent occurrence of apothecia was first noted in Skåne in 2002 and particularly from 2004 onwards (S.Å. Hanson personal communication).

Norway

Hy. albidus was recorded in 1985 from the southwest of Norway (Bergen) by S. Olsen (K. Homble personal communication), and is today still present along the west coast, according to molecular data by Hietala and Solheim (2011). Possibly it had occurred also in the southeast of Norway before Hy. fraxineus invaded the country, but K. Homble never found apothecia referable to Hy. albidus in the Oslo area before 2009.

The first symptoms were noted in 2006 in the most southern part of the country. The first isolate of Ch. fraxinea was made in SE-Norway in May 2008 in a nursery in the Østfold region, and in 2009 the disease has spread along the entire coastline there (Talgø et al. 2009; Timmermann et al. 2011). K. Homble (personal communication) noticed mass occurrence of apothecia in VIII.2012 in Kjaglidalen (Bærum, Akershus, 15 km west of Oslo), while H. Solheim (personal communication) observed the first mass occurrence in 2009 near Ås (30 km S of Oslo).

Hietala and Solheim (2011) found by molecular methods that Hy. albidus survived along the west coast of Norway. According to Hietala et al. (2013, p. 5), ‘The low ascospore number of Hy. albidus detected by real-time PCR in our Norwegian ash stand could relate to such a transition. On the other hand, our data suggest that Hy. albidus is still present in the studied forest.’.

Great Britain

Berkeley and Broome (1878, p. 29, No. 1724) list a single record of Hy. albidus located in Southeast England, with the data ‘On ash petioles. [Kent,] East Farleigh, Sept. 13, 1876’. The same record is mentioned by Cooke (1878, p. 127). Also Phillips (1887, p. 138) gave only one though very remote West English record ([Shropshire,] Shrewsbury, Copthorne). Dennis (1956, p. 93, as He. robergei) based his description on two British specimens, the one mentioned by Berkeley, and one in the east of England: Norfolk, Wheatfen [SE of Norwich], 27.VII.1946.

Clark (1980) recorded Hy. albidus rather often on black patches of Fraxinus petioles (but also on Aesculus) in Warwickshire (West Midlands of England), with the first record in 1967. Ellis and Ellis (1997, p. 137, fig. 600) probably relied on Clark’s records when saying that Hy. albidus is common during July–October. A distribution map is shown in Webber and Hendry (2012), which includes also misidentified records, especially on substrates other than Fraxinus.

The British Isles were considered as being free of Hy. fraxineus until January 2012 when ash seedlings were imported from the Netherlands and Germany. At four locations in England they showed the typical signs of the disease (Webber & Hendry 2012). In August 2012 Ch. fraxinea was reported as well from Scotland in a stand of young ashes planted in spring 2009 (Webber & Hendry 2012; Munro 2012). Mainly the eastern part of the country was affected.

An intensive survey carried out since November 2012 confirmed 427 sites with ash trees infected by Ch. fraxinea (status 25.III.2013). Southeastern areas of the British main island are affected the most (http://www.defra.gov.uk/news/2012/11/09/wms-ash/), but confirmed sites are distributed from Wales to Scotland and Ireland.

Denmark

A couple of collections of Hy. albidus have been made between 1989 and 1999, some of which were DNA-checked (McKinney et al. 2012, T. Laessøe personal communication). According to the molecular analysis, other collections made in 2005–2010 turned out to belong always to Hy. fraxineus, including three sites where Hy. albidus apothecia had been collected previously, and it was concluded that Hy. fraxineus had eliminated Hy. albidus in these regions.

The first records of ash disease were in 2002 near Haderslev (a small port on the Baltic side of the Jutland peninsula), and in 2003 in Zealand and Bornholm (Thomsen et al. 2011; Bakys 2013).

The Netherlands

Arnolds et al. (1999) considered Hy. albidus as a comparatively rare species, though rather common in the Ijsselmeerpolders and Zeeland. A Dutch online database (http://www.verspreidingsatlas.nl/622010) shows indeed numerous records throughout the country, many of which dating before 1990. Only Fraxinus petioles are given as substrate. A record made by S. Helleman in Nijmegen (Gelderland) in 2007 is here confirmed to represent Hy. albidus.

Ash dieback was first reported in 2010 at young trees in public parks in Bellingwedde in the far northeast of the country close to the German border (EPPO 2010). L. Deceuninck recorded for the first time apothecia of Hy. fraxineus in 2012 at Schokland (Flevoland, B. Declercq personal communication), while S. Helleman (personal communication) did not observe occurrence of Hy. fraxineus around Boxmeer (Noord-Brabant) until recently (2013).

Belgium and Luxembourg

Mouton (1886, p. 140) reported Hy. albidus from Beaufays near Liège (on petioles of Fraxinus, without any further data). In a preliminary checklist for Flanders, Declercq (personal communication) considered Hy. albidus as rather common, based on numerous records collected and identified by Lieve Deceuninck, Bernard Declercq and Piet Bormans during 1989–2012. Also from Wallonia a lot of records were made during 1993–2008 by B. Declercq. For all of them the absence of croziers was noted (B. Declercq personal communication, documentation not seen). A further record from the southeast of Belgium and three from Luxembourg preserved at LUX (all leg. C. Besch, during 1985–1990) were re-examined in the present study and found to represent Hy. albidus.

According to Roskams and De Haeck (2011), the first record of ash disease was in autumn 2010 in Eastern Flanders (Hainaut), while in Flemish Brabant it was already present as early as 2007. In 2011 the disease was recorded throughout Flanders. For Wallonia (Southern Belgium) the disease was firstly recorded in June 2010 (Chandelier et al. 2011). Apothecia of Hy. fraxineus were detected for the first time in Belgium and Luxembourg in 2012 and 2013 (B. Declercq, G. Marson personal communication, Garnier-Delcourt et al. 2013), and that in great abundance at various sites.

France

Roberge’s specimens of Hy. albidus around Caen (dépt. Calvados) concern the abundant type collection made around 1850, and a scantier later sample. Cooke (1876, p. 132, pl. LXV fig. 297) and Patouillard (1885, p. 173, pl. 382) gave the first illustrations of the species. While Cooke studied the type material (Desm. n° 2004), Patouillard obviously depicted a recent collection (with living spores) but regrettably did not indicate its origin. Boudier (1908, p. 287, pl. 492) provided a detailed coloured illustration based on a record from Fôret de Carnelle north of Paris (dépt. Val-d’Oise), and stated that the species is frequent in summer and autumn.

A further record was made near Paris on 2.IX.1945 by Arnaud (Gams & Arnold 2007). Here the apothecia (on blackened petiole) were parasitized by the hyphomycete Pleurocatena acicularis Arnaud ex Gams & Arnold. From near Besançon a record of Hy. albidus was made in 22.VIII.1996 and illustrated by G. Moyne (personal communication).

From 2007 onwards, M. Hairaud (personal communication) observed Hy. albidus repeatedly in dépt. Deux Sèvres, especially in Marais Poitevin. Based on a molecular identification, Husson et al. (2011) listed 18 recent records of Hy. albidus from Central and West France, one made in 2002 (dept. Calvados), and 17 in 2009 (dépts Côte d’Armor, Haute-Marne, Maine-et-Loire, Saône-et-Loire, Haute-Saône, Moselle, Meurthe-et-Moselle).

According to a map given by Goudet and Piou (2012), the first record of ash disease was in 2008 in dépt. Haute-Saône, though a map in Timmermann et al. (2011) gives 2007 for this region. A photo taken by G. Moyne (personal communication) near Besançon (La Vèze, bois d’Aglans, dépt. Doubs, 13.VIII.2008) showing abundant and rather large apothecia on entirely blackened petioles supports that the disease invaded this part of Eastern France already before 2008. In their molecular study, Husson et al. (2011) identified in the whole northeast of France exclusively Hy. fraxineus (collected in 2009), while in Central and West France only Hy. albidus was recorded (see above). In 2010 the disease was widespread in Northeastern France, but was also recorded in Northern France, and in 2012 in the northwest (Normandie, Jersey).

Germany

When Arendholz (1979, p. 79) performed his study on leaf-inhabiting Helotiales, he had only material of Hy. albidus of the nineteenth century at his disposition: the type collection, the material of Berkeley, and a specimen from Germany (Sachsen, Großer Winterberg [Sächsische Schweiz, Elbsandsteingebirge], X.1898, W. Krieger, Fungi Sax. 1486, HBG). Baral and Krieglsteiner (1985, p. 121) reported collections from the south of Germany made during 1975–1979 along the rivers Rhein and Donau, also from Franken and Eifel, but were unaware of records from Northern Germany. Beyer (1992, p. 67) described a single collection made in August near Burggaillenreuth (Bayreuth), and believed the species to be rare. G.J. Krieglsteiner (1993, pl. 745) presented a distribution map for W-Germany that shows a scattered occurrence of Hy. albidus within Niedersachsen, Rheinland-Pfalz, Baden-Württemberg, and Bayern, but whether it includes also misidentified samples on other substrates or without pseudosclerotium remains unclear.

L.G. Krieglsteiner (1999, p. 238, 2004, p. 601) reported Hy. albidus from 4 localities in the Main area between Schweinfurt and Würzburg (Bayern), and from the Rhön mountains at the edge of Bayern, Hessen and Thüringen with 14 collections. Judging from the phenology data (30.VII.–30.X.) and the occurrence in the years between 1996 and 2004, these records might all concern Hy. albidus. The same is true for nine samples from the Hainich National Park made between 16.VII. and 17.XI. in 2003 made by F. Putzmann, G. Hirsch and A. Gminder (P. Püwert & I. Wagner personal communication). Especially those specimens collected in 2003–2004 should be re-examined for croziers in order to exclude Hy. fraxineus. However, Hy. fraxineus has apparently never been recorded within Thüringen in the years before 2008 (P. Püwert & I. Wagner personal communication); therefore, we strongly suspect that the ash disease was still absent in the Hainich and Rhön region in 2004.

As early as 2002, ash dieback or conspicuous damages on ash were noticed in the northeastern lowlands (Schumacher et al. 2007; Leonhard et al. 2009; Heydeck & Dahms 2012). The first scientific proof of the presence of Ch. fraxinea for Germany was published by Schumacher et al. in 2007 and was detected in material collected from woodlands and nurseries, e.g., from Salzwedel (Altmark, Sachsen-Anhalt). The earliest records of mass fructifications that came to our notice were observed in Sachsen (SN, 2006) and Mecklenburg-Vorpommern (MV, 2007) (see Table 2). In Mecklenburg many ash stands have been cut in order to avoid damage of the timber; therefore, the pathogen was suppressed (T. Richter personal communication).

In Thüringen, the fructifications of Hy. fraxineus became very abundant from 2008 onwards (P. Püwert & I. Wagner personal communication). Although the ascus base was studied by I. Wagner (personal communication) in only a few collections, the absence of abundant fruit bodies in previous years suggests that all these records from the south of Thüringen (around Sonneberg) but also some from the Rhön mountains collected in 2011 belonged to Hy. fraxineus. The presence of Ch. fraxinea was confirmed officially for Thüringen as late as 2009 (Baier et al. 2010; TLWJF 2010).

In Baden-Württemberg ash dieback was first noted in 2006 for a single tree in the eastern part of the country (Gaildorf, Metzler 2010, personal communication). The first detection of Ch. fraxinea dates from 2009 from near Aalen (Schröter et al. 2009, B. Metzler personal communication), and the disease remained almost undetected in SW-Germany before 2009 (Metzler 2009). At four sites in Baden (along the Rhine between Freiburg and Karlsruhe) dieback symptoms could be backdated to 2007 based on repeated yearly infection, followed by proliferation of replacement shoots (Metzler et al. 2012). The first symptoms detected in the region around Stuttgart (Calw, Ludwigsburg, Heilbronn, Schwäbisch Hall, etc.) were all made in May and June 2009 (B. Metzler personal communication). Apothecia were first recorded near Heidelberg in 2009 (M. Bemmann, unpreserved) and near Tübingen in 2011 (H.O. Baral, Table 2).

For Bayern the disease seems to have started in 2008, being recorded at various sites, especially in the north (Main area) and the southeast to east (Leonhard et al. 2009). Apothecia were first recorded in 2009 by P. Karasch in the southeast, and in 2010 in the northeast by H. Ostrow (P. Karasch personal communication).

Austria

Some records of Hy. albidus from Oberösterreich are included in the distribution map of Krieglsteiner (1993, pl. 745). A recent map (Dämon et al. 2009) shows 98 records under the name Hy. albidus, mainly from the north and east of Austria, and merely 7 of Hy. fraxineus. Only a few of the Hy. albidus records date before 2000, whilst the majority was made between 2008 and 2009; therefore, probably most of them concern Hy. fraxineus. For a critical review of these records and a map see Kirisits and Cech (2009). After the invasion of Hy. fraxineus, Hy. albidus has not been observed in Austria anymore (Kirisits & Kräutler 2013).

Ash dieback appears to have invaded Austria from Czechia. The first observations on younger trees date from 2005, while in 2008 symptoms were observed in all Austrian provinces. Ch. fraxinea was first isolated in 2007, and apothecia were first detected in 2009 in great number in various parts of the country (Kirisits & Cech 2011).

Switzerland and Liechtenstein

Breitenbach and Kränzlin (1981) reported Hy. albidus in the cantons Luzern, Obwalden and Nidwalden, and stated the species to be uncommon. Prongué et al. (2004) gave four records for Liechtenstein, and the drawing on our Figure 1 refers to one of them. A recent distribution map of Switzerland (Senn-Irlet 2014) gives four records of Hy. albidus before 1990 and eight between 1991 and 2005, but 26 after 2005. However, the records after 2005 certainly include Hy. fraxineus. Based on molecular identification, Queloz et al. (2011) reported 24 collections of Hy. albidus from the cantons Bern, Glarus, Obwalden, Ticino, Valais, Zug and Zürich, collected mainly in 2009 but also earlier. Most of them originate from montane to subalpine areas in more southern regions of Switzerland (see Figure 23).

The epidemic was not evident before 2007 in Switzerland, and diseased trees were noticed in 2008 only in the north and northwest of the country. During 2009–2011 Hy. fraxineus spread towards the Alps (Engesser & Meier 2012; Pautasso et al. 2013). Apothecia of Hy. fraxineus were recorded by Queloz et al. (2011) during 2009–2011. In the montane southern cantons Ticino, Glarus and Wallis the disease was still absent during that period.

Italy

Rehm (1893, p. 797) mentioned a collection from Südtirol (leg. G. Bresadola), in which apothecia of obviously Hy. albidus arise from blackened patches on the petioles of Fraxinus (other records in Rehm concern Cy. fraxinophila). A record from Vigevano (Pavia) on rotting petioles of Fraxinus (22.IX.1983) is included in the checklist of fungi from the ‘Parco della Valle del Ticino’ (Gaggianese et al. 2002).

In NW-Italy along the Italo-Slovenian border, Ogris, Hauptman, Jurc et al. (2010) recorded in July 2009 ash dieback symptoms and isolated Ch. fraxinea from one canker.

Czechia

Velenovský (1934, p. 205) considered He. albidum as frequent and often abundant in whole Bohemia. However, he confused this species with Cy. fraxinophila (see below). Although two of his four preserved specimens represent Hy. albidus (Central Bohemia: Bilichov 23.VII.1925, PRM 147373; Slané IX.1928, PRM 148933), it can be assumed that his observation of an abundant occurrence was only true for Cy. fraxinophila.Two further Czech specimens were deposited by V. Vacek (Cernošice, 12.VII.1942, PRM 683594; Žarošice, 5.IX.1942, PRM 683595). Revision of this material and also that from Bilichov (PRM 147373) done by M. Tomšovský and O. Koukol based on morphology and especially molecular data (see GenBank HF937562.1, HF937561.1, HF937560.1) confirmed the identification as Hy. albidus. No material of Hy. albidus is present in PRC and BRNM. When searching for Hy. albidus since 2009, no records were made of this species which appears to be extinct.

Ash dieback symptoms were observed already in the mid-1990s, and increasingly in 2004 (Jankovský et al. 2008). In Moravia, the first record of Ch. fraxinea was in 2007 (Jankovský & Holdenrieder 2009). In most parts of Bohemia and Moravia, Hy. fraxineus is now abundant everywhere (O. Koukol personal communication). Collections from Bohemia deposited in PRM are, e.g., from Srbská Kamenice in the north of Czechia (6.VI.2009, PRM 961903, M. Chlebická) and Bílý vrch between Mochov and Celákovice northeast of Praha (8.VII.2011, PRM 899715, M. Kríž). Numerous further collections taken since 2009 from various localities in Czechia belonged exclusively to Hy. fraxineus, with the highest observed altitude at 970 m in Southern Bohemia (Ceské Žleby, 17. IX. 2013, leg. V. Poustka, PRC 1806), whereas Hy. albidus seems to be extinct (O. Koukol personal communication).

Hungary

Bánhegyi (1941, p. 18) reported a collection of Hy. albidus on petioles of Fraxinus (Budapest, Hüvösvölgy, 12.VII.1940), and Svrček (1979, p. 153) one on blackened petioles and veins of Fraxinus angustifolia (PRM 818040, collected by him in 20.IX.1978 during the VII. Congress of European Mycologists in Budapest in the Bugac puszta; a specimen made during this congress is also found in CUP-059500).

Symptoms of ash dieback on F. excelsior and isolation of Ch. fraxinea were first reported in May 2008 in NW-Hungary (Szabó 2009).

Slovenia and Croatia

According to N. Matočec and I. Kušan (personal communication), Hy. albidus is not uncommon in montane areas of Croatia. However, Hy. fraxineus was observed to have replaced it since about 2010, though in lower rate at altitudes above 1000 m, while it was abundant also at the few studied colline sites. Because these results are part of a funded project, we refrained from including Croatian records in our map of Hy. albidus.

Ogris et al. (2009) and Ogris, Hauptman, Bogovi (2010) observed dieback of ash in Slovenia during 2006–2009, and the first records of apothecia in 2009 and 2010 (as ‘Hy. albidus’). For Croatia, Barić et al. (2012) reported first records of Ch. fraxinea in 2009, and dieback symptoms since 2010–2011 on both F. excelsior and F. angustifolia, with apothecia observed since 2011.

Molecular research

The identification of the pathogen is currently accomplished by molecular methods. The used gene regions for species delimitation mainly concern the internal transcribed spacer ribosomal DNA (ITS), the calmodulin gene (CAL), and the translation elongation factor 1-α gene (EF1-α). The nuclear large subunit rDNA (LSU, = 28S) sequence is available so far only for one strain of Hy. fraxineus in GenBank (HM145907, Europe) and another in Nite Biological Resource Center (NBRC102368, Japan), whereas the nuclear small subunit rRNA (SSU, = 18S) was rather frequently obtained. The β-tubulin gene is present in GenBank for a single strain of a Hymenoscyphus only (Hy. fructigenus, FJ477056), but was used by Zheng and Zhuang (2014) to distinguish between Hy. fraxineus and Hy. albidoides, with a consistent difference at 12 nucleotide positions. Microsatellite markers were developed for studying the population genetics of the pathogen (Gross, Grünig et al. 2012; Gross, Zaffarano et al. 2012). In addition, the MAT was sequenced and analysed to investigate the mating system of Hy. fraxineus and Hy. albidus (Gross, Zaffarano et al. 2012).

Differences between European Hymenoscyphus fraxineus and Hymenoscyphus albidus

Queloz et al. (2011) defined Hy. fraxineus based on 20 nucleotide positions in the CAL gene and 18 positions in the region of the EF1-α gene. At these 38 specifically mentioned, so-called definition positions, Hy. fraxineus consistently differed from Hy. albidus in the available sequences. Therefore, they were selected to constitute the protologue of the new species (see also Queloz et al. (2012) for corrections to these positions). Four further positions represent gaps that were not considered in the protologue definition (V. Queloz, personal communication). These are pos. 235 in the CAL gene, and pos. 232–234 in the EF1-α gene (the alignment at pos. 232–236 is not at an optimum in the table of Zhao et al. 2013)(Table 5).

Table 5.

Part of ITS1 which includes seven critical positions. At two of them (marked in blue: 80, 124) European Hy. fraxineus deviates from NE-Asian Hy. fraxineus. Positions in red (77, 79, 87, 101, 117) concern definition positions against Hy. albidus that apply also for Asian samples (see also Table 6).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is tmyc-5-228-t005.gif

However, also in the ITS rDNA region 11 nucleotide positions can be used to distinguish Hy. fraxineus from Hy. albidus. Based on the presently available data in GenBank, together with the original ITS sequence of Japanese material in NBRC, four sequences published in Shabunin et al. (2012) from Leningrad Oblast, and four gained by V. Queloz (personal communication) from Central European specimens of the first author, European Hy. fraxineus differs from Hy. albidus in the ITS1 region at positions 77 (T/C), 79 (T/C), 80 (gap/G), 87 (C/T), 101 (T/C), 117 (C/T), and 124 (T/C), and in the ITS2 region at positions 355 (G/C), 361 (T/C), 436 (C/A) and 450 (C/A) (Tables 5 and and6)6) [position numbers starting with the last five nucleotides of the SSU: CATTA]. One exception must be mentioned: though otherwise perfectly matching Hy. fraxineus, a twice sequenced isolate from Czechia (071026.1, FJ429386, GU586921) shows at position 124 the character C which would be typical of Hy. albidus, as well as Chinese, Korean and Japanese Hy. fraxineus.

Table 6.

Variable nucleotide positions of the ITS1 (77–155), 5.8S (212), and ITS2 (355–453) of Hymenoscyphus albidus and Hy. fraxineus from European and Asian samples [position numbers starting with the last five nucleotides of the SSU: ‘CATTA’]; ***/** = normal case, * = infrequent abnormal case. Definition positions that apply also to Asian samples are marked in red, whereas at the blue markings Asian and European samples of Hy. fraxineus differ, the former matching Hy. albidus. Positions identical to all sequences are omitted, and identical sequences are equally omitted except for a few from Asia.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is tmyc-5-228-t006.gif

Apart from the characteristics in the ITS, Husson et al. (2011, table 4) mentioned a difference of four nucleotides in the partial SSU between the two species: positions 56 (C/T), 90 (C/A), 182 (T/C), and 269 (C/G) [the authors counted from the beginning of their sequences that start with CTTGGTCA]. It must be noted that those critical positions which they listed for the ITS bear a few errors: positions 460, 461, 463 should read 460, 462, 463 (bold = gap, position 460 corresponds to pos. 77 in Figures 2324), and 607 is an error for 507 (=pos. 124 in Figures 2324). LSU sequences from Hy. albidus were not available in GenBank for comparison with Hy. fraxineus.

Type sequences of Hymenoscyphus albidus

Husson et al. (2011) succeeded to isolate ITS rDNA from the two ~160 years old duplicates of the type collection of Hy. albidus preserved in the Caen Herbarium. According to their sequences deposited in GenBank, only 67 nucleotides (part of ITS1) were gained from n° 1604 (HM193465), but 510 nucleotides (part of SSU, ITS1, and 5.8S) from n° 2004 (HM193466). Both sequences fully match previously obtained sequences of Hy. albidus in GenBank, thus confirming the identity of the type material. Five critical positions are located in the region of the 67 nucleotides of n° 1604, (77, 79, 80, 87, 101; Tables 5 and and6),6), allowing exclusion of Hy. fraxineus, while the sequence from n° 2004 covers all 7 critical positions of the ITS1.

Intraspecific variation in the ITS

Within the many European sequences of Hy. fraxineus variation in the ITS was noted only in on sample (positions 124 and 379, see Table 6). In Hy. albidus three sequences showed variation, which concerns positions 86, 93, and 399. Among the 7 Japanese sequences variation occurred at positions 155, 212, and 443, and among the 6 Chinese sequences only at position 443 (Zheng & Zhuang 2014). The four Korean sequences (KF830850, KF830851, KF830852, KF830853) do not show any variation (J.G. Han personal communication). This infraspecific variation of Hy. albidus and Hy. fraxineus lies in the range of 0–0.5% of the entire ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 region, and the distance between the two species is about 2.2–2.4%.

Does European Hymenoscyphus fraxineus originate from the northeast of Asia?

The phylogenetic analyses by Zhao et al. (2013), J.G. Han (personal communication) and Zheng and Zhuang (2014) have shown that European and Asian Hy. fraxineus cluster together in a clade with rather high conformity and support, sharply separate from Hy. albidus. However, two deviations were noted, which question the asserted invasion of the pathogen from the presently known distribution area in Eastern Asia. According to the results presented by Zhao et al., all seven Japanese ITS sequences fully concur with European Hy. fraxineus, except for two nucleotide positions (80 and 124) at which the Japanese ones show the character of Hy. albidus (80: G instead of a gap, 124: C instead of T; counted when starting with CATTA, see Tables 56). The very same peculiarity is shown by all four ITS sequences from South Korea (J.G. Han) and all six from the northeast of China (Zheng & Zhuang 2014). As mentioned above, a sample of Hy. fraxineus from Czechia which was twice sequenced (FJ429386, GU586921) shows at position 124 the character of the Asian samples, while at position 80 it shows the typical gap of European Hy. fraxineus. This sequence further deviates from all sequences of Hy. albidus/Hy. fraxineus at position 379: T vs. C, Table 6).

In the two available sequences of LSU, European Hy. fraxineus (HM145907, Slovenia) deviates from Japanese (NBRC102368) at two positions in the overlapping part. More sequences are needed to clarify whether these two positions are constant markers. In the CAL and EF1-α gene regions, Japanese and European Hy. fraxineus isolates do not consistently deviate from each other, with at best one exception: at position 266 of CAL, Japanese isolates have A and European G, but one Japanese (TNS-F-12503, AB705208) has also G.

Further arguments against an origin from the northeast of Asia were presented by Drenkhan et al. (2014) who showed that the outbreak of the disease in NW-Estonia in 1995 was not associated with the areas where Mandshurian ash had repeatedly been introduced as seeds or seedlings since nearly 150 years.

Variation of Asian Hymenoscyphus fraxineus towards the genome of Hymenoscyphus albidus

Various nucleotide positions are presently known at which Asian Hy. fraxineus shows infraspecific variation. These can be divided into two groups: those positions at which Hy. fraxineus does not differ within Europe from Hy. albidus, and those at which the two differ. In the latter group (the definition positions), the Asian sequences show either the character of Hy. fraxineus or that of Hy. albidus, but never a further possibility. In other words: when deviating from European Hy. fraxineus, variation of Asian Hy. fraxineus was always towards the character of Hy. albidus. This strange phenomenon, which reminds of the two consistent deviations in the ITS between European and Asian Hy. fraxineus, might indicate a lineage from the ancient Asian Hy. fraxineus towards the younger Hy. albidus.

Variation in the ITS region within Asian Hy. fraxineus is noted at three positions (155, 212, 443) which are located outside the definition positions. Variation in the EF1-α gene within Japanese isolates concerns various positions. Among these are 11 definition positions, and all of them show either the character of European Hy. fraxineus or that of Hy. albidus (see Zhao et al. 2013, table 3; gaps not counted, pos. 236 must show a T instead of a gap). Also one position in the CAL gene (244) shows this phenomenon in both Japanese and Chinese specimens, and a further position (49) varies in one Chinese specimen towards Hy. albidus. These variations concern not only transitions but also transversions.

Phylogenetic considerations within the Fraxinus-inhabiting species

According to fossil finds, the genus Fraxinus occurred for the first time in the early Eocene(?) in North America. The land bridge between North America and Asia during this epoch allowed it to spread westwards while forming different species. According to molecular data, Asian species such as F. mandshurica are older than European species such as F. excelsior and F. angustifolia (Wallander 2008; Hinsinger 2010). Parallel to this evolutionary progress, different leaf decaying fungi developed on different Fraxinus species, such as R. longipes in North America (see below), Hymenoscyphus fraxineus in Eastern Asia, and Hymenoscyphus albidus in Europe.

The poor genetic variability of both Hy. albidus and Hy. fraxineus in comparison with a rather high variability of Eastern Asian Hy. fraxineus as detected by Zhao et al. (2013) and Gross, Hosoya et al. (2014) might suggest that not only the invasion of Hy. fraxineus but also that of Hy. albidus to Europe started from a small part of the whole Asian gene pool of Hy. fraxineus. This hypothesis is supported by the striking coincidence in the variable nucleotides of Japanese Hy. fraxineus with the stable nucleotides of European Hy. albidus (Zhao et al. 2013). Possibly, the ancient invasion of Europe derived from a single infection event, which resulted in the homothallic European species Hy. albidus. The loss of an anamorph as well as croziers at the ascogenous hyphae appears to be a consequence of this homothally. If these presumptions were true, the ancient invasion from Asia was perhaps also initially accompanied by ill effects to European ash.

Relationship of Hymenoscyphus aesculi and Hymenoscyphus vacini

In a phylogenetic study of the ITS rDNA of various species of Hymenoscyphus by V. Queloz and A. Gross (personal communication), two sequences of Hy. aesculi (H.B. 5736, 8914) and two of Hy. vacini (H.B. 8296, 9590) were gained from the dry apothecia. Unexpectedly, the two species did not cluster in the vicinity of Hy. fraxineus and Hy. albidus, but in a clade with two other foliicolous species, Hy. microserotinus (HMAS 68521) and ‘Hy. serotinus’ (HMAS 82122, = Hy. aff. vacini, see Baral and Bemmann 2013).

A pairwise distance analysis of the complete ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 region showed a difference between Hy. aesculi/Hy. vacini and Hy. albidus/Hy. fraxineus of 11–12.5%. The two Hy. aesculi sequences vary by 0.2% (1 nucleotide and 4 gaps in the ITS2), while the two Hy. vacini sequences are virtually identical and show a distance of 4.7–5% to Hy. aesculi. Hy. microserotinus deviates from Hy. aesculi by 4.5% and from Hy. vacini by 3.5%, and Hy. aff. vacini by 9–11% from the remaining three species of this clade.

Generic concept of Hymenoscyphus and taxonomic weight of the dark stroma

Hy. albidus is currently placed in Hymenoscyphus, the type genus of the family Helotiaceae. From its earlier placement in Helotium it was transferred merely for nomenclatural reasons. The concept of Hymenoscyphus as applied in later years was heterogeneous, however, and included species showing affinities to the Hyaloscyphaceae, such as Ca. herbarum (Pers.) Gray (see Baral and Krieglsteiner 1985, p. 119; Baral 1994). On the other hand, species that obviously belong in Hymenoscyphus, including most of the here treated species, have been misplaced in rutstroemiaceous genera.

Karsten (1871) considered He. albidum as a variety of He. scutula (Pers.) W. Phillips. Both taxa undoubtedly belong in the core of Hymenoscyphus, with the type species Hy. fructigenus (Bull. ex Mérat) Gray, characterized by scutuloid ascospores. In a wider concept of the genus, an apical ring of the Hymenoscyphus-type is characteristic. This generic concept of Hymenoscyphus includes taxa with and without a dark substratal stroma.

In strong contrast to this concept, Carpenter (1981) argued with ‘the presence of a well-developed substratal stroma at the base of the apothecia, and an outer ectal excipulum of a textura prismatica’, the combination of which he believed to be diagnostic of the genus Lanzia (Sclerotiniaceae), to which he consequently combined Hy. albidus. Without stating arguments, Korf (1982) transferred the species to Lambertella in the same family (both genera are today classified in the Rutstroemiaceae). Like Carpenter, Korf (personal communication) was convinced of the high taxonomical importance of the substratal stroma within this family, but he preferred for Hy. albidus the genus Lambertella because he saw some brown spores (probably in European material which he collected in 1978). However, this concept neglects the characteristic scutuloid spore shape as well as the type of ascus apical ring, which is very distinctive between members of Helotiaceae and Sclerotiniaceae.

Svrček (1985) followed this concept when transferring Helotium aesculi and He. vacini to Lanzia, but it remains a mystery why he did not perform this transfer with Hy. albidus. Also Hosoya et al. (1993) fully accepted Carpenter’s view but preferred for H. albidus the genus Lambertella because of the drastic colour change of the overmature spores towards brown, which he observed in Japanese material now identified as H. fraxineus.

Baral (in Baral & Krieglsteiner 1985, p. 121) and Spooner (1987, p. 199) expressed their doubts about the taxonomic value of the stroma at the family level, being aware of the morphological similarity in ascospore shape and excipular structure of, e.g., Hymenoscyphus albidus and Lan. vacini with species of Hymenoscyphus which do not darken the substrate, such as He. scutula.

Zhang and Zhuang (2004) and Zhuang and Liu (2007) found by molecular methods that previous concepts of Lanzia need reconsideration, and that species with scutuloid spores, such as Hy. serotinus and Hy. microserotinus, belong in Hymenoscyphus, despite their dark substratal stroma. The placement of Hy. albidus and Hy. fraxineus in Hymenoscyphus is confirmed by molecular-phylogenetic analyses in Zhao et al. (2013) and Zheng and Zhuang (2014), also by two unpublished molecular studies (V. Queloz & O. Holdenrieder and J.G. Han & H.D. Shin, personal communication). The undoubtedly closely related Hy. aesculi and Hy. vacini are similarly misplaced in Lanzia, but molecular data were only available for Hy. aesculi which nested within Hymenoscyphus (V. Queloz personal communication).

Lambertella torquata Zhuang (1995), on herbaceous stems from Anhui Province in China, has likewise scutuloid spores and a conical ascus apex (the shape of the apical ring is not described); therefore, it certainly represents a Hymenoscyphus as well. The described infundibuliform collar at the spore base undoubtedly concerns a modification of the setulae which are characteristic of quite a few species of Hymenoscyphus. Due to its very large spores Lam. torquata obviously represents a distinct species, which is here transferred as follows:

Hymenoscyphus torquatus (W.Y. Zhuang) I. Kušan & Baral, comb. nov. – MycoBank MB 809092

Basionym: Lambertella torquata W.Y. Zhuang, Mycotaxon 56, p. 41 (Zhuang 1995)

Also Lambertella caudatoides Zhuang and Lambertella tengii Zhuang have scutuloid spores and were described in Lambertella because the spores turn light brown when they become median septate (Zhuang 1999, 2002). Undoubtedly they belong in Hymenoscyphus, but their transfer should await careful comparison and redescription, e.g., concerning the ascus base.

A further misplacement of stroma-forming discomycetes in the Rutstroemiaceae concerns Dicephalospora Spooner (1987, on twigs) and the two petiole-inhabiting species Lanzia huangshanica Zhuang (1995) and Lanzia aurantiaca (Zhuang) Zhuang in Zhuang and Liu (2007). A collection of D. rufocornea (Berk. & Broome) Spooner from Mauritius was studied (H.B. 6962) and found to have an amyloid apical ring of the Hymenoscyphus-type. The spores are not scutuloid, though slightly heteropolar, and possess round gelatinous appendages at both ends, typical of Dicephalospora. Lan. huangshanica has similar spores but without appendages, but the type of amyloid ring is not discernible on the photos in Zhuang (1995). A pale yellow granular exudate releases a honey-yellow pigment in KOH in Dicephalospora, whereas no such pigment is released in Lan. huangshanica. In a phylogenetic study by Zhuang and Liu (2007), the two taxa cluster in one clade, quite separate from the true Rutstroemiaceae, but also remote from Hymenoscyphus. Possibly Lan. huangshanica will be transferred to Dicephalospora in the future, a view also shared by Zhuang and Liu (2007).

Rutstroemia longipes, a similar though unrelated species on Fraxinus in North America

Records of Hymenoscyphus albidus or Hy. fraxineus on the American continent appear to be so far unknown. However, an equivalent leaf decaying fungus on Fraxinus with striking similarities exists: R. longipes. According to White (1941, p. 203, 204), this very common species fruits in late summer (July–Sept.) on entirely blackened rachises of Fraxinus americana and F. nigra in eastern and central areas of North America.

This species was also reported from Europe; however, a collection under this name on Fraxinus angustifolia from Hungary (leg. R.P. Korf & P. Lizoň, det. R.P. Korf, PRM 818046), made during the VII. Congress of European Mycologists in Budapest in Sept. 1978, was briefly mentioned by Svrček (1979, p. 155). A further collection made during this meeting is deposited in CUP and was examined by the first author: Kiskunság National Park, Bugac, Hungary, on blackened rachises of Fraxinus angustifolia ssp. pannonica, 20.IX.1978, R.P. Korf, H. Dissing et al. (CUP-059489, H.B. 9860).

During the past hundred years the species has been placed in various genera. White (1941) lists the following synonyms:

  • Rutstroemia longipes (Cooke & Peck) White, Lloydia 4, p. 203 (1941)

  • Peziza longipes Cooke & Peck, Bull. Buffalo Soc. nat. Sci. 1, p. 295 (1875)

  • Phialea longipes (Cooke & Peck) Sacc., Syll. fung. (Abellini) 8, p. 267 (1889)

  • Lanzia longipes (Cooke & Peck) Dumont & Korf, Mycotaxon 7(2), p. 185 (1978)

  • Hymenoscyphus longipes (Cooke & Peck) Kuntze, Revis. gen. pl. (Leipzig) 3(2), p. 485 (1898)

  • = Helotium sulfurellum Ellis & Everh., Bull. Torrey bot. Club 10(7), p. 98 (1883)

  • Ciboria sulfurella (Ellis & Everh.) Rehm, in Durand, Bull. Torrey bot. Club 29, p. 461 (1902)

  • Calycina sulfurella (Ellis & Everh.) Kuntze, Revis. gen. pl. (Leipzig) 3(2), p. 449 (1898)

  • = Ciboria tabacina Ellis & Holw., Bull. Geol. Nat. Hist. Surv. Minnesota 3, p. 35 (1887)

White (1941) emphasized the ‘more prominently developed stroma than any other member of the genus’ [Rutstroemia]. His precise description of the stroma in section being ‘seated directly on the sclerenchyma’ matches exactly the situation in Hy. albidus and Hy. fraxineus. However, an acervular conidial state is formed ‘more or less associated with the black stromatic lines’, with conidiophores and conidia not unlike Ch. fraxinea. Comparable ellipsoid conidia are formed from the germinating ascospores.

The thin apothecial stipe of a very variable length reminds indeed of a Rutstroemiaceae, and the entirely yellow apothecia resemble those of R. luteovirescens (Roberge ex Desm.) W.L. White, a species currently recorded on petioles of Acer but originally described from Tilia and Platanus. Seaver (1951) even synonymized R. longipes with R. luteovirescens. The morphological differences between the two species are actually not very striking, and a genetical comparison has apparently never been done. White (1941) distinguished them by in the fresh state sulphur-yellow vs. greenish-yellow apothecia, which on drying turn dark brown in R. longipes while remaining more or less unchanged in R. luteovirescens, also by slightly larger asci and spores in the latter species.

The oblong-ellipsoid, slightly inequilateral ascospores were reported by White as (9–)10–14(–16) × 4.5–6 µm and to contain two large oil drops when fresh. In the specimen from Hungary their size is given by Svrček (1979) as 10–11.5 × 4.5–5 µm, which is here confirmed (†9.8–11.5 × 4.3–5 µm). The overmature spores are 1–3-septate. The production of ellipsoid conidia on short pegs or germ tubes appears to be rather untypical for a member of Rutstroemia, in which usually globose to subglobose conidia are formed (see also Whetzel 1945, as ‘spermatia’, these conidia are also typical of other genera of Sclerotiniaceae). However, for Torrendiella ciliata Graddon (1979) illustrated narrowly tear-shaped conidia. Acervuli in which similar elongate-ellipsoid conidia are formed were reported by White also for R. longiasca (Cavara) White, R. renispora (Ellis) White, and R. pruni-serotinae Whetzel & White.

Despite White’s detailed descriptions, those of the asci are very brief and in some species he does not even state the iodine reaction. Also information about the ascus base is lacking, contrary to his later studies. His drawings are not exact enough to recognise the type of apical ring: even White’s illustrations of typical members of Rutstroemia mislead to think that they have an ascus apex of the Hymenoscyphus-type. The present re-examination of R. longipes shows that the amyloid apical ring is of the Sclerotinia-type. Also a specimen of R. pruni-serotinae (New York, Ithaca, Lloyd Preserve, McLean, leaves of Prunus spinosa, 5.VIII.1932, H.H. Wetzel, CUP 025545, H.B. 9863) was re-examined and confirmed to be sclerotiniaceous. In both specimens the asci arise from croziers.

Acknowledgements

Various collectors are thanked for telling us their observations in their country or sending specimens or photos, or literature: Margrit Bemmann, Bernard Declercq, René Dougoud, Javier Fernández, Alain Gardiennet, Ueli Graf, Bernt Grauwinkel, Michel Hairaud, Jaegu Han, Sven-Åke Hanson, Stip Helleman, Kaare Homble, Claude Husson, Peter Karasch, Thomas Kirisits, Gerhard Koller, Ondřej Koukol, Tadeusz Kowalski, Ivana Kušan, Ernestas Kutorga, Thomas Laessøe, Neven Matočec, Guy Marson, Berthold Metzler, Gilbert Moyne, Bernd Mühler, Ibai Olariaga, Eugene Popov, Peter Püwert, Torsten Richter, Enrique Rubio, Halvor Solheim, Marie-Thérèse Tholl, Ingo Wagner, Chris Yeates, and others. Also Valentin Queloz and Tsuyoshi Hosoya generously sent their specimens for examination, and in turn V. Queloz and Andrin Gross received specimens of the first author’s herbarium for DNA studies and supplied their results. Richard P. Korf and Scott LaGreca (CUP, Ithaca, NY) is thanked for a gift of two duplicate specimens (R. longipes and R. pruni-serotinae), Markéta Šandová (Chlebicka) for data on the Hungarian specimen of Hy. albidus, and Brian Douglas for literature on croziers and karyology in Chaetomium and Podospora. C. Yeates and E. Rubio kindly allowed us the use of their photos of Hy. aesculi. Marc Stadler and Kevin Hyde are thanked for their formal and linguistic suggestions to the introductory part during presubmission editing.

References

  • Allescher A. Verzeichnis in Süd-Bayern beobachteter Pilze, IV. Abteilung: Hysteriaceae, Hiscomycetaceae et Tuberaceae. Bericht des botanischen Vereins in Landshut. 1898;15:1–138. [Google Scholar]
  • Arendholz W-R. Hamburg: Universität Hamburg; 1979. Morphologisch-taxonomische Untersuchungen an blattbewohnenden Ascomyceten aus der Ordnung der Helotiales. dissertation. [Google Scholar]
  • Arnolds E, Kuyper ThW, Noordeloos ME, editors. Overzicht van de paddestoelen in Nederland. 2nd revised ed. Wijster: Nederlandse Mycologische Vereniging; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • Baier U, Thiel J, Stürtz M, Völker L. Waldschutzbericht für 2010 und prognostische Hinweise für 2011. [cited 2013 Nov 6;];2010 http://www.thueringenforst.de/imperia/md/content/folder/waldschutz/waldschutzbericht_2010_web.pdf
  • Bakys R. Uppsala: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences; 2013. Dieback of Fraxinus excelsior in the Baltic Sea region: associated fungi, their pathogenicity and implications for silviculture. thesis. [Google Scholar]
  • Bánhegyi J. Újabb adatok Budapest környéke Discomycetáinak ismeretéhez (Nouvelles contributions à la connaissance des discomycètes des environs de Budapest) Borbásia. 1941;3:17–29. [Google Scholar]
  • Baral H-O. Der Apikalapparat der Helotiales. Eine lichtmikroskopische Studie über Arten mit Amyloidring. Z Mykol. 1987;53:119–130. [Google Scholar]
  • Baral H-O. Beiträge zur Taxonomie der Discomyceten II. Die Calycellina-Arten mit 4-sporigen Asci. Beitr Kennt Pilze Mitteleuropas. 1989;5:209–236. [Google Scholar]
  • Baral H-O. Vital versus herbarium taxonomy: morphological differences between living and dead cells of ascomycetes, and their taxonomic implications. Mycotaxon. 1992;44:333–390. [Google Scholar]
  • Baral H-O. Comments on ‘Outline of the ascomycetes – 1993’ Systema Ascomycetum. 1994;13:113–128. [Google Scholar]
  • Baral H-O. Hymenoscyphus seminis-alni, a new species of the H. fructigenus-complex. Mycotaxon. 1996;60:249–256. [Google Scholar]
  • Baral H-O. Vital and type studies around Hymenoscyphus menthae (= H. consobrinus and H. calyculus) illustrating the taxonomic value of spore guttulation and croziers in preparation [Google Scholar]
  • Baral H-O, Bemmann M. Hymenoscyphus serotinus and H. lepismoides sp. nov., two lignicolous species with a high host specificity. Ascomycete.org. 2013;5:109–128. [Google Scholar]
  • Baral H-O, Galán R, Krisai-Greilhuber I, Matočec N, Palmer JT. Tatraea dumbirensis, new records of a rare leotialean discomycete in Europe. Österr Z Pilzk. 1999;8:71–82. [Google Scholar]
  • Baral H-O, Galán R, Platas G, Tena R. Phaeohelotium undulatum comb. nov. and Phaeoh. succineoguttulatum sp. nov., two segregates of the Discinella terrestris aggregate found under Eucalyptus in Spain: taxonomy, molecular biology, ecology and distribution. Mycosystema. 2013;32:386–428. [Google Scholar]
  • Baral H-O, Krieglsteiner GJ. Bausteine zu einer Askomyzeten-Flora der Bundesrepublik Deutschland: in Süddeutschland gefundene inoperkulate Diskomyzeten – mit taxonomischen, ökologischen, chorologischen Hinweisen und einer Farbtafel. Z Mykol, Beiheft. 1985;6:1–160. [Google Scholar]
  • Baral H-O, Queloz V, Hosoya T. Hymenoscyphus fraxineus, the correct scientific name for the fungus causing ash dieback in Europe. IMA Fungus. 2014;5:79–80. 10.5598/imafungus.2014.05.01.09. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Barić L, Županić M, Pernek M, Diminić D. Prvi nalazi patogene gljive Chalara fraxinea u Hrvatskoj – novog uzročnika odumiranja jasena (Fraxinus spp.). [First records of Chalara fraxinea in croatia – a new agent of ash dieback (Fraxinus spp.)] Šumarski List. 2012;136:461–469. [Google Scholar]
  • Beltrán Tejera E, Rodriguez-Armas JL, Á BB, Lado Rodríguez C. Hongos. In: Beltrán-Tejera E, editor. Hongos, líquenes y briófitos del Parque Nacional de Garajonay (Gomera, Islas Canarias) Madrid: Org. Autónomo de Parques Nacionales, Serie Técnica. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente; 2008. pp. 41–390. [Google Scholar]
  • Bengtsson SBK, Vasaitis R, Kirisits T, Solheim H, Stenlid J. Population structure of Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus and its genetic relationship to Hymenoscyphus albidus . Fungal Ecol. 2012;5:147–153. 10.1016/j.funeco.2011.10.004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Berkeley MJ, Broome CE. Notices of British Fungi. Ann Magazine Nat Hist Ser. 5. 1878;I:17–30. [Google Scholar]
  • Berkson BM. Cytomorphological studies of the ascogenous hyphae in four species of Chaetomium . Mycologia. 1966;58:125–130. 10.2307/3756993. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Beyer W. Pilzflora von Bayreuth und Umgebung (Libri Botanici 5) Eching: IHW-Verlag; 1992. [Google Scholar]
  • Beyer W. Ergänzungen zur Pilzflora von Bayreuth und Umgebung, Teil 1. Z Mykol. 1998;64:163–202. [Google Scholar]
  • Boudier É. Histoire et classification naturelle des discomycètes d’Europe. Paris: Klincksieck; 1907. [Google Scholar]
  • Boudier É. Icones mycologicæ [Série 4 fasc. 19] Paris: Klincksieck; 1908. [Google Scholar]
  • Breitenbach J, Kränzlin F. Die Pilze der Schweiz. Band 1 Ascomyceten. Luzern: Edition Mykologia; 1981. [Google Scholar]
  • Bujakiewicz A. Macrofungi of the Querco-Ulmetum minoris association in the Ostrów Panieński reserve on the Vistula river (N Poland) Acta Mycologica. 2001;36:111–125. 10.5586/am.2001.008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cai L, Wu W-P, Hyde KD. Phylogenetic relationships of Chalara and allied species inferred from ribosomal DNA sequences. Mycol Progress. 2009;8:133–143. 10.1007/s11557-009-0585-5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cannon PF, Hawksworth DL, Sherwood-Pike MA. The British Ascomycotina: an annotated checklist. Kew: Commonwealth Mycological Institute; 1985. [Google Scholar]
  • Carpenter SE. Monograph of Crocicreas (Ascomycetes, Helotiales, Leotiaceae) Mem N Y Bot Gard. 1981;33:1–290. [Google Scholar]
  • Chandelier A, Delhaye N, Helson M. First report of the ash dieback pathogen Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus (anamorph Chalara fraxinea) on Fraxinus excelsior in Belgium. Plant Dis. 2011;95:220. 10.1094/PDIS-07-10-0540. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chandelier A, Helson M, Dvorak M, Gischer F. Detection and quantification of airborne inoculum of Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus using real-time PCR assays. Plant Pathol. 2014 10.1111/ppa.12218. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Clark MC, editor. A Fungus flora of Warwickshire. Birmingham: BMS; 1980. [Google Scholar]
  • Cleary MR, Arhipova N, Gaitnieks T, Stenlid J, Vasaitis R. Natural infection of Fraxinus excelsior seeds by Chalara fraxinea . Forest Pathol. 2012;43:83–85. 10.1111/efp.12012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cooke MC. Carpology of Peziza . Grevillea. 1876;6(31):132. [Google Scholar]
  • Cooke MC. New British fungi. Grevillea. 1878;6:121–128. [Google Scholar]
  • Croxton RJ. Berkeley: 1966. Detection and classification of ash dieback on large-scale color aerial photographs (U.S. Forest Serv. Res. Paper PSW-35) [Google Scholar]
  • Dämon W, Hausknecht W, Krisai-Greilhuber A. Österreichische Mykologische Gesellschaft, Datenbank der Pilze Österreichs. [cited 2014 May 20;]];2009 http://austria.mykodata.net/Taxa_map.aspx?qvtaxIdTaxon=172751&
  • Dennis RWG. A revision of the British Helotiaceae. Mycol Papers. 1956;62:1–216. [Google Scholar]
  • Dennis RWG. Remarks on the genus Hymenoscyphus S.F. Gray, with observation on sundry species referred by Saccardo and others to the genus Helotium, Pezizella or Phialea . Persoonia. 1964;3:29–80. [Google Scholar]
  • Dennis RWG. British Ascomycetes. Vaduz: Cramer; 1978. [Google Scholar]
  • Desmazières JBHJ. Plantes Cryptogames de France, fasc. 41. Lille: Desmazières; 1850. [Google Scholar]
  • Desmazières JBHJ. Dix-neuvième notice sur les plantes cryptogames récemment découvertes en France. Ann Sci Nat Bot Paris Sér III. 1851;16:296–330. [Google Scholar]
  • Drenkhan R, Hanso M. New host species for Chalara fraxinea . New Dis Rep. 2010;22:16. 10.5197/j.2044-0588.2010.022.016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Drenkhan R, Sander H, Hanso M. Introduction of Mandshurian ash (Fraxinus mandshurica Rupr.) to Estonia: is it related to the current epidemic on European ash (F. excelsior L.)? Eur J Forest Res. 2014 10.1007/s10342-014-0811-9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dumont KP. Leotiaceae III: notes on selected temperate species referred to Helotium and Hymenoscyphus . Mycotaxon. 1981;13:59–84. [Google Scholar]
  • Dumont KP, Carpenter SE. Los Hongos de Colombia-VII: Leotiaceae IV. Hymenoscyphus caudatus and related species from Colombia and adjacent regions. Caldasia. 1982;13:567–602. [Google Scholar]
  • Ellis MB, Ellis JP. Microfungi on land plants: an identification handbook (new enlarged edition) Slough: The Richmond; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • Engel H, Hanff B. Pilzneufunde in Nordwestoberfranken 1987, II. Teil. Ascomyceten. Die Pilzflora Nordwestoberfrankens. 1989 [1988];12/A:27–44. [Google Scholar]
  • Engesser R, Forster B, Meier F. Eschenwelke breitet sich weiter aus. Waldschutz aktuell 3-2009. Birmensdorf: Eidg. Forschungsanstalt WSL; 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • Engesser R, Meier F. Eschenwelke wird noch bedrohlicher. Aktuelle Verbreitung und neuer Infektionsweg. Wald und Holz. 2012;12:35–39. [Google Scholar]
  • Engesser R, Meier F, Queloz V, Holdenrieder O, Kowalski T. Das Triebsterben der Esche in der Schweiz. Wald Und Holz. 2009;6:24–27. [Google Scholar]
  • European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization Eppo reporting service No. 9, 2010/151. [cited 2014 May 24;];2010 archives.eppo.int/EPPOReporting/2010/Rse-1009.pdf
  • Feltgen J. Vorstudien zu einer Pilz-Flora des Großherzogthums Luxemburg. I. Theil, Ascomycetes, Nachträge III. Luxemburg: Beffort; 1903. [Google Scholar]
  • Flajšman K. Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana; 2011. Značilnocti rasti izolatov glive Chalara fraxinea in vpliv različnih gojišč thesis. [Google Scholar]
  • Floreancig V. Padova: Università degli studi di Padova; 2009. Presenza di Chalara fraxinea Kowalski lungo il confine italo-sloveno. thesis. [Google Scholar]
  • The Fungal Records Database of Britain and Ireland British mycological society. [cited 2013];2013 http://www.fieldmycology.net/FRDBI/FRDBI.asp
  • Gaggianese E, Nobili G, Parrettini G, Prim A. Funghi. In: Furlanetto D, editor. Atlante della biodiversità nel Parco Ticino, Pontevecchio di. Magenta: Consorzio Parco Lombardo della Valle del Ticino; 2002. pp. 19–100. [Google Scholar]
  • Galán R, Baral H-O. Hymenoscyphus tamaricis (Leotiales), a new species from Spain. Beiträge Zur Kenntnis Der Pilze Mitteleuropas. 1997;XI:57–66. [Google Scholar]
  • Gams W, Arnold GRW. The hyphomycete genus Pleurocatena, anamorphs of Pyxidiophora . Nova Hedwigia. 2007;84:381–393. 10.1127/0029-5035/2007/0084-0381. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gams W, Humber RA, Jaklitsch W, Kirschner R, Stadler M. Minimizing the chaos following the loss of Article 59: suggestions for a discussion. Mycotaxon. 2012;119:495–507. 10.5248/119.495. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Garnier-Delcourt M, Marson G, Reckinger C, Schultheis B, Tholl M-T. Notes mycologiques luxembourgeoises. VII. Bull Soc Nat Luxemb. 2013;114:35–54. [Google Scholar]
  • Gillet C-C. Champignons de France, Les Discomycètes, livr. 4. Alençon: De Broise; 1881 [1879]. [Google Scholar]
  • Goudet M, Piou D. La Chalarose du Frêne: que sait-on? Rev For Fr LXIV. 2012;1:27–40. [Google Scholar]
  • Graddon WD. Discomycete notes and records 2. Trans Brit Mycol Soc. 1979;73:180–188. [Google Scholar]
  • Grelet L-J. Les discomycètes de France d’apres la classification de Boudier. XIX. Revue de Mycologie. 1949;14:26–57. [Google Scholar]
  • Gross A, Grünig CR, Queloz V, Holdenrieder O. A molecular toolkit for population genetic investigations of the ash dieback pathogen Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus . For Pathol. 2012;42:252–264. 10.1111/j.1439-0329.2011.00751.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gross A, Holdenrieder O. On the longevity of Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus in petioles of Fraxinus excelsior . Forest Pathol. 2013;43:168–170. 10.1111/efp.12022. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gross A, Holdenrieder O, Pautasso M, Queloz V, Sieber TN. Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus, the causal agent of European ash dieback. Mol Plant Pathol. 2014;15:5–21. 10.1111/mpp.12073. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gross A, Hosoya T, Queloz V. Population structure of the invasive forest pathogen Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus . Molecular Ecol. 2014 10.1111/mec.12792. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gross A, Zaffarano PL, Duo A, Grünig CR. Reproductive mode and life cycle of the ash dieback pathogen Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus . Fungal Genet Biol. 2012;49:977–986. 10.1016/j.fgb.2012.08.008. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hairaud M. Un champignon menace le frêne dans toute l’Erurope. Soc. Myc. du massif d’Aragon. 2010;30:20–25. [Google Scholar]
  • Hendry S. Chalara dieback of ash – an overview of the disease and current research. Forest Research, Northern Research Station; 2013. [cited Apr 21; 2014]. www.forestry.gov.uk/pdf/Chalara-scienceMarch2013.ppt [Google Scholar]
  • Hengstmengel J. Notes on Hymenoscyphus – 2: on three non-fructicolous species of the ‘fructigenus-group’ with croziers. Persoonia. 1996;16:191–207. [Google Scholar]
  • Hengstmengel J. Notes on Hymenoscyphus – 3: on the nomenclature of Hymenoscyphus subcarneus (Ascomycota, Helotiales) Mycotaxon. 2009;107:267–276. 10.5248/107.267. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Heydeck P, Dahms C. Trieberkrankungen an Waldbäumen im Brennpunkt der forstlichen Phytopathologie. Eberswalder Forstliche Schriftenreihe. 2012;49:47–55. [Google Scholar]
  • Hibben CR, Silverborg SB. Severity and causes of ash dieback. J Arboriculture. 1978;4:274–279. [Google Scholar]
  • Hietala AM, Solheim H. Hymenoscyphus species associated with European ash. EPPO Bulletin. 2011;41:3–6. 10.1111/j.1365-2338.2010.02426.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hietala AM, Timmermann V, Børja I, Solheim H. The invasive ash dieback pathogen Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus exerts maximal infection pressure prior to the onset of host leaf senescence. Fungal Ecol. 2013;6 10.1016/j.funeco.2013.03.008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hinsinger DD. Quebec (QC): Université Laval; 2010. Diversité et évolution du genre Fraxinus . dissertation. [Google Scholar]
  • Hosoya T, Otani Y, Furuya K. Materials for the fungus flora of Japan (46) Trans Mycol Soc Japan. 1993;34:429–432. [Google Scholar]
  • Huhtinen S. A monograph of Hyaloscypha and allied genera. Karstenia. 1990;29:45–252. [Google Scholar]
  • Husson C, Scala B, Caël O, Frey P, Feau N, Ioos R, Marçais B. Chalara fraxinea is an invasive pathogen in France. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2011;130:311–324. 10.1007/s10658-011-9755-9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jaap O. Verzeichnis der bei Triglitz in der Prignitz beobachteten Ascomyceten. Verhandlungen Des Botanischen Vereins Der Provinz Brandenburg. 1910 [1911];52:109–150. [Google Scholar]
  • Jankovský L, Holdenrieder O. Chalara fraxinea – Ash dieback in the Czech Republic. Plant Prot Sci. 2009;45:74–78. [Google Scholar]
  • Jankovský L, Palovčíková D, Dvořák M. Alien diseases of wood plants in the Czech Republic. Forstschutz Aktuell. 2008;44:32–34. [Google Scholar]
  • Johnston PR. The Bloxamia anamorph of Bisporella discedens . Mycotaxon. 1988;31:345–350. [Google Scholar]
  • Jönsson MT, Thor G. Estimating coextinction risks from epidemic tree death: affiliate lichen communities among diseased host tree populations of Fraxinus excelsior . PLoS ONE. 2012;7:1–10. 10.1371/journal.pone.0045701. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Juodvalkis A, Vasiliauskas A. Lietuvos uosynų džiūvimo apimtys ir jas lemiantys veiksniai. Lietuvos Žemės Ūkio Universiteto Mokslo Darbai. Biomedicinos Mokslai. 2002;56:17–22. [Google Scholar]
  • Karsten PA. Mycologia Fennica. Pars prima – Discomycetes. Finska: Helsingfors; 1871. [Google Scholar]
  • Kimbrough JW, Atkinson M. Cultural features and imperfect stage of Hymenoscyphus caudatus . Am J Bot. 1972;59:165–171. 10.2307/2441396. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kirisits T. Eschenpathogen Chalara fraxinea nun auch in Kärnten nachgewiesen. Forstschutz Aktuell. 2008;45:28–30. [Google Scholar]
  • Kirisits T. Eschentriebsterben – Stand des Wissens und Empfehlungen an die Praxis. Forstverein Oberösterreich & Salzburg. [cited 2014 Apr 21;];2010 www.forstverein-ooesbg.at/de/view/files/download/forceDownload/?tool=12&feld=download&sprach_connect=34
  • Kirisits T. Eschentriebsterben in Vorarlberg und Tirol. [cited 2014 May 14;];Forstschutz Aktuell. 2011 51:14–18. http://bfw.ac.at/400/pdf/fsaktuell_51_5.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • Kirisits T, Cech TL. Beobachtungen zum sexuellen Stadium des Eschentriebsterben-Erregers Chalara fraxinea in Österreich. Forstschutz Aktuell. 2009;48:21–25. [Google Scholar]
  • Kirisits T, Cech TL. Wien: 2011. [cited 2014 May 29;]. Zurücksterben der Esche in Österreich: ursachen, Verlauf, Auswirkungen und mögliche Forstschutz- und Erhaltungsmaßnahmen. BMLFUW-Forschungsprojekt Nr. 100343.https://www.dafne.at/dafne_plus_homepage/download.php?t=ProjectReportAttachment&k=2584 [Google Scholar]
  • Kirisits T, Dämpfle L, Kräutler K. Hymenoscyphus albidus is not associated with an anamorphic stage and displays slower growth than Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus on agar media. Forest Pathol. 2013;43:386–389. 10.1111/efp.12042. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kirisits T, Kräutler K. Hymenoscyphus albidus besitzt kein Chalara-Stadium. Forstschutz Aktuell. 2013;57– 58:32–36. http://bfw.ac.at/030/pdf/fsaktuell_57.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • Kirisits T, Matlakova M, Mottinger-Kroupa S, Halmschlager E. Pilz verursacht Eschentriebsterben. Forstzeitung. 2009;2009:8–9. [Google Scholar]
  • Kirk PM, Spooner BM. An account of the Fungi of Arran, Gigha and Kintyre. Kew Bulletin. 1984;38:503–597. 10.2307/4108573. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Korf RP. New combinations and a new name for discomycetes illustrated by Boudier in the Icones Mycologicae. Mycotaxon. 1982;19:1–2. [Google Scholar]
  • Korf RP, Lizoň P. Lambertellinia scutuloides, a new genus and species of Sclerotiniaceae, and its relationship. Inoculum. 1993;44:43. [Google Scholar]
  • Korf RP, Lizoň P. Lambertellinia scutuloides (Sclerotiniaceae), a new genus and species for a discomycete previously confused with Hymenoscyphus caudatus . Mycotaxon. 1994;50:167–174. [Google Scholar]
  • Korf RP, Zhuang W. Some new species and records of discomycetes in China. Mycotaxon. 1985;22:483–514. [Google Scholar]
  • Kowalski T. Chalara fraxinea sp. nov. associated with dieback of ash (Fraxinus excelsior) in Poland. For Pathol. 2006;36:264–270. 10.1111/j.1439-0329.2006.00453.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kowalski T. Zamieranie jesionu – aspekty taksonomiczne sprawcy choroby [Ash dieback – taxonomical aspects of the disease causal agent] Sylwan. 2012;156:262–269. [Google Scholar]
  • Kowalski T, Bartnik C. Morphological variation in colonies of Chalara fraxinea isolated from ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) stems with symptoms of dieback and effects of temperature on colony growth and structure. Acta Agrobotanica. 2010;63:99–106. 10.5586/aa.2010.012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kowalski T, Białobrzeski M, Ostafińska A. The occurrence of Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus apothecia in the leaf litter of Fraxinus excelsior stands with ash dieback symptoms in southern Poland. Acta Mycol. 2013;48 10.5586/am.2013.031. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kowalski T, Czekaj A. Symptomy chorobowe I grzyby na zamierających jesionach (Fraxinus excelsior L.) w drzewostanach Nadleśnictwa Staszów. Leśne Prace Badawcze. 2010;71:357–368. 10.2478/v10111-010-0031-0. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kowalski T, Holdenrieder O. The teleomorph of Chalara fraxinea, the causal agent of ash dieback. For Pathol. 2009;39:304–308. 10.1111/j.1439-0329.2008.00589.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kraj W, Zarek M, Kowalski T. Genetic variability of Chalara fraxinea, dieback cause of European ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) Mycol Prog. 2012;11:37–45. 10.1007/s11557-010-0724-z. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Krieglsteiner GJ. Verbreitungsatlas der Großpilze Deutschlands (West). 2. Schlauchpilze. Stuttgart: Verlag Eugen Ulmer; 1993. [Google Scholar]
  • Krieglsteiner LG. Regensburger Mykologische Schriften 9. Regensburg: Regensburgische Botanische Gesellschaft; 1999. Pilze im Naturraum Mainfränkische Platten und ihre Einbindung in die Vegetation; p. 905 pp. [Google Scholar]
  • Krieglsteiner LG. Regensburger Mykologische Schriften 12. Regensburg: Regensburgische Botanische Gesellschaft; 2004. Pilze im Biosphären-Reservat Rhön und ihre Einbindung in die Vegetation; p. 770 pp. [Google Scholar]
  • Kullman B, Tamm H, Kullman K. Fungal genome size database. [cited 2013 Nov 23;];2005 http://www.zbi.ee/fungal-genomesize/
  • Laundon JR. Deceased Lichenologists: their abbreviations and herbaria. The Lichenologist. 1979;11:1–26. 10.1017/S0024282979000037. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Le Gal M. Florule mycologique des Bois de la Grange et de l’Etoile (Seine-et-Oise), Discomycètes II. Revue De Mycologie N S. 1938;3:129–147. [Google Scholar]
  • Leonhard S, Straßer L, Nannig A, Blaschke M, Schumacher J, Immler T. Neues Krankheitsphänomen an der Esche. Das von Chalara fraxinea verursachte Eschentriebsterben ist auch in Bayern nachgewiesen. LWF Aktuell. 2009;71:60–63. [Google Scholar]
  • Lisiewska M, Bujakiewicz A. Grzyby. Roślinność rezerwatu “Dębina” pod Wągrowcem w Wielkopolsce: 3. Grzyby [Vegetation of the “Dębina” reserve in Wielkopolska region: 3. Fungi] Badania Fizjograficzne nad Polską Zachodnią, Seria B, Botanika. 1976;29:57–67. [Google Scholar]
  • Lygis V, Vasiliauskas R, Larsson K, Stenlid J. Wood-inhabiting fungi in stems of Fraxinus excelsior in declining ash stands of northern Lithuania, with particular reference to Armillaria cepistipes . Scand J For Res. 2005;20:337–346. 10.1080/02827580510036238. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Marčiulynienė D, Cleary MR, Shabunin D, Stenlid J, Vasaitis R. Malmö: European Cooperation in Science and Technology; 2013. [cited 2014 May 16;]. Detection of Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus in Primorye region, far east Russia; COST Action FP1103 Fraxback 4th MC meeting & workshop ‘Frontiers in ash dieback research’http://www.fraxback.eu/spdownloads/MC_uploads/malmo%20fraxback%20meeting%202013.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • Martin GW. Three new Heterobasidiomycetes. Mycologia. 1934;26:261–265. 10.2307/3754140. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Massee G. British Fungus-Flora: a classified text-book of mycology. IV. London: Bell & Sons; 1895. [Google Scholar]
  • Massee G, Crossland C. The fungus flora of Yorkshire. (Bot trans Yorkshire naturalists’ union 4) London: A. Brown & Sons; 1905. [Google Scholar]
  • Matlakova M. Wien: Universität für Bodenkultur; 2009. Untersuchungen zum gegenwärtigen Zurücksterben der Eschen. [Google Scholar]
  • McKinney LV, Thomsen IM, Kjær ED, Bengtsson SBK, Nielsen LR. Rapid invasion by an aggressive pathogenic fungus (Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus) replaces a native decomposer (Hymenoscyphus albidus): a case of local cryptic extinction? Fungal Ecol. 2012;5:663–669. 10.1016/j.funeco.2012.05.004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • McNeill J, Barrie FR, Buck WR, Demoulin V, Greuter W, Hawksworth DL, Herendeen PS, Knapp S, Marhold K, Prado J, editors. International code of nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Melbourne Code) adopted by the Eighteenth International Botanical Congress Melbourne, Australia, Jul 2011. Königstein: Koeltz, Scientific Books; 2012. [cited 2014 May 29;]. http://www.iapt-taxon.org/nomen/main.php?page=title [Google Scholar]
  • Metzler B. Eschentriebsterben – Chalara fraxinea in Südwestdeutschland. Waldschutz-Info. 2009;4:1–4. [Google Scholar]
  • Metzler B. Weitere Entwicklung des Eschentriebsterbens. Waldschutz-Info. 2010;3:1–4. [Google Scholar]
  • Metzler B, Enderle R, Karopka M, Töpfner K, Aldinger E. Entwicklung des Eschentriebsterbens in einem Herkunftsversuch an verschiedenen Standorten in Süddeutschland. Allg. Forst- Jagdztg. 2012;183:168–180. [Google Scholar]
  • Migula W. Kryptogamen-Flora von Deutschland, Deutsch-Österreich und der Schweiz. Band III. Pilze. 3. Teil. 2. Gera: Abteilung Ascomycetes; 1913. [Google Scholar]
  • Morière MJ. Notice biographique sur M. Roberge. Mém Acad Imp Sci, A & B-Lett Caen. 1866:495–507. [Google Scholar]
  • Mouton V. Ascomycètes observés aux environs de Liège. Bull Soc Roy Bot Belg 1 Sér, T. 1886;25:137–161. [Google Scholar]
  • Munro P. Alert re-issued as ash tree disease found in Scotland. [cited 2013 Nov 23;];2012 http://www.forestry.gov.uk/newsrele.nsf/web-allbysubject/FD77B38FDB47770F80257A6100387DD2
  • Nag Raj TR, Kendrick WB. A monograph of Chalara and allied genera. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press; 1975. [Google Scholar]
  • Nylander W. Observationes circa Pezizas Fenniae. Not Sällsk Fauna Fl Fenn Forh. 1868 [1869];10:1–97. [Google Scholar]
  • Ogris N, Hauptman T, Bogovi M. Prezgodnje odpadanje listov velikega jesena je povzročila gliva Hymenoscyphus albidus, povzročiteljica jesenovega ožiga. [cited 2014 Apr 21;];Novice Iz Varstva Gozdov. 2010 3:1–2. http://www.zdravgozd.si/nvg/pdf/nvg-3.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • Ogris N, Hauptman T, Jurc D. Chalara fraxinea causing common ash dieback newly reported in Slovenia. Plant Pathol. 2009;58:1173. 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2009.02105.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ogris N, Hauptman T, Jurc D, Floreancig V, Marsich F, Montecchio L. First report of Chalara fraxinea on common ash in Italy. [cited 2010 Apr 21;];Plant Disease. 2010 94(1):133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-94-1-0133A [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Otto P, Wagner I. Informationen zum Triebsterben der Gewöhnlichen Esche. Boletus. 2011;33:50–51. [Google Scholar]
  • Patouillard N. Tabulæ analyticæ fungorum, descriptions & analyses microscopiques des champignons nouveaux, rares ou critiques, 1re série (fasc IV) Paris: Klincksieck; 1885. [Google Scholar]
  • Paulin-Mahady AE, Harrington TC, McNew D. Phylogenetic and taxonomic evaluation of Chalara, Chalaropsis, and Thielaviopsis anamorphs associated with ceratocystis. Mycologia. 2002;94:62–72. 10.2307/3761846. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pautasso M, Aas G, Queloz V, Holdenrieder O. European ash (Fraxinus excelsior) dieback – A conservation biology challenge. Biol Conserv. 2013;158:37–49. 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.08.026. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pawsey RG. Oxford: Commonwealth Forestry Institute; 1983. Ash dieback survey (C. F. I. Occasional Papers no. 24) [Google Scholar]
  • Pham TLH, Zaspel I, Schuemann M, Stephanowitz H, Krause E. Rapid in-vitro and in-vivo detection of Chalara fraxinea by means of mass spectrometric techniques. Amer J Plant Sci. 2013;4:444–453. 10.4236/ajps.2013.42A057. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Phillips W. A manual of the British discomycetes with description of all the species of fungi hitherto found in Britain, included in the family and illustrations of the genera. London: Kegan Paul, Trench & Co; 1887. [Google Scholar]
  • Popov ES. Discomycetes of the north-west of European part of Russia 1. Discomycetes collected in Novgorod region. Mikol Fitopatol. 2005;39:53–60. [Google Scholar]
  • Prongué JP, Wiederin R, Wolf B. Die Pilze des Fürstentums Liechtenstein. Vaduz: Amtlicher Lehrmittelverlag; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • Queloz V, Grünig CR, Berndt R, Kowalski T, Sieber TN, Holdenrieder O. Cryptic speciation in Hymenoscyphus albidus . For Pathol. 2011;41:133–142. 10.1111/j.1439-0329.2010.00645.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Queloz V, Grünig CR, Berndt R, Kowalski T, Sieber TN, Holdenrieder O. Corrigendum on cryptic speciation in Hymenoscyphus albidus . Forest Pathol. 2012;42:352. 10.1111/j.1439-0329.2012.00796.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Réblová M, Gams W, Štěpánek V. The new hyphomycete genera Brachyalara and Infundichalara, the similar Exochalara and species of ‘Phialophora sect. Catenulatae’ (Leotiomycetes) Fungal Diversity. 2011;46:67–86. 10.1007/s13225-010-0077-6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rehm H. Ascomyceten: Hysteriaceen und Discomyceten. In: Dr L. Rabenhorst’s Kryptogamen-Flora von Deutschland, Oesterreich und der Schweiz; 1893. 2. Auflage, Vol. 1, III (fasc. 40). Leipzig: Kummer. [Google Scholar]
  • Roskams P, De Haeck A. De Essenziekte (Chalara fraxinea) in het Vlaamse Gewest: een voorlopige stand van zaken. (Rapporten van het Instituut voor Natuur en Bosonderzoek 49) Brussel: Instituut voor Natuur- en Bosonderzoek; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • Roumeguère C. Cryptogamie illustrèe ou histoire des familles naturelles des plantes acotylédones d’Europe: famille des champignons. Paris: Baillère; 1870. [Google Scholar]
  • Roumeguère C. Fungi Gallici exsiccati – Centurie LVIII. Revue Mycologique. 1891;8:123–134. [Google Scholar]
  • Roumeguère C. Fungi exsiccati precipue Gallici, LXe centurie. Revue Mycologique. 1892;14:1–11. [Google Scholar]
  • Rytkönen A, Lilja A, Drenkhan R, Gaitnieks T, Hantula J. First record of Chalara fraxinea in Finland and genetic variation among isolates sampled from Åland, mainland Finland, Estonia and Latvia. For Pathol. 2011;41:169–174. 10.1111/j.1439-0329.2010.00647.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Saccardo PA. Sylloge Fungorum omnium hucusque cognitorum 8. Patavia: Typis Seminarii; 1889. [Google Scholar]
  • Schröter H, Delb H, Metzler B. Waldschutzsituation 2008/2009. Waldschutz-Info. 2009;2:2009. [Google Scholar]
  • Schröter J. Die Pilze Schlesiens. In: Cohn F, editor. Kryptogamenflora von Schlesien, 3. Band, 2. Hälfte. Breslau: J.U. Kern; 1893. [Google Scholar]
  • Schumacher J, Wulf A, Leonhard S. Erster Nachweis von Chalara fraxinea T. Kowalski sp. nov. in Deutschland – ein Verursacher neuartiger Schäden an Esche. Nachrichtenblatt Des Deutschen Pflanzenschutzdienstes. 2007;59:121–123. [Google Scholar]
  • Seaver FJ. The North American cup fungi (inoperculates) New York: The Author; 1951. [Google Scholar]
  • Senn-Irlet B. Verbreitungsatlas Pilze der Schweiz. [cited 2014 May 20;];2014 http://www.wsl.ch/dienstleistungen/inventare/pilze_flechten/swissfungi/verbreitungsatlas/index_DE
  • Shabunin DA, Semakova TA, Davydenko EV, Vasaitis RA. Ash decline in nature monument ‘Dudergof heights’, caused by the fungus Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus, and morphological features of its ascospores. Proc Saint-Petersburg For Res Inst. 2012;2012:70–79. [Google Scholar]
  • Sharma MP. Chandigarh: Panjab University; 1976. Studies on inoperculate discomycetes of north-western Himalayas. dissertation. [Google Scholar]
  • Sharma MP. Diversity in the Himalayan Hymenoscyphus S.F. Gray: an overview. In: Khullar SP, Sharma MP, editors. Himalayan botanical researches. New Delhi: Ashish Publishing House; 1991. pp. 108–211. [Google Scholar]
  • Solheim H, Timmermann V, Børja I, Hietala AM, Talgø V. Nytt om askeskuddsjuke. Park & Anlegg. 2011;2011:36–38. [Google Scholar]
  • Spooner BM. Helotiales of Australasia: Geoglossaceae, Orbiliaceae, Sclerotiniaceae, Hyaloscyphaceae. (Bibl. Mycol. 116) Berlin: Cramer; 1987. p. 711 pp. [Google Scholar]
  • Stafleu FA, Cowan RS. Taxonomic literature: A selective guide to botanical publications and collections with dates, commentaries and types. Vol 1. Utrecht: Bohn, Scheltema & Holkema; 1976. [Google Scholar]
  • Stepanenkova N. Kaunas: Lietuvos Žemės Ūkio Universitetas; 2010. Spread of Chalara fraxinea in the drying ash stands in Lithuania. master thesis. [Google Scholar]
  • Svrček M. Fungi in Hungaria mense Septembri lecti. Česká Mykol. 1979;33:150–158. [Google Scholar]
  • Svrček M. A taxonomic revision of inoperculate discomycetes described by J. Velenovský in the genus Helotium, preserved in National Museum, Prague. Acta Musei Nationalis Pragae. 1985;40B [1984]:129–215. [Google Scholar]
  • Svrček M. New or less known Discomycetes XIX. Česká Mykol. 1989;43:65–76. [Google Scholar]
  • Szabó I. First report of Chalara fraxinea affecting common ash in Hungary. Plant Pathology. 2009;58:797. 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2009.02032.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Talgø V, Sletten A, Brurberg MB, Solheim H, Stensvand A. Chalara fraxinea isolated from diseased ash in Norway. [cited 2009 May 29;];Plant Dis. 2009 93(5):548. http://apsjournals.apsnet.org/doi/abs/10.1094/PDIS-93-5-0548A [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Thind KS, Sharma MP, Singh H. Fungi of the Indian subcontinent – A collection of papers. Vaduz: Cramer; 1983. The Nepal Helotiales – 1; pp. 265–279. [Google Scholar]
  • Thind KS, Singh H. The Helotiales of India – VIII. Proc Indian Acad Sci, Sect B. 1969;70:251–261. [Google Scholar]
  • Thomsen IM, McKinney LV, Nielsen LR, Hansen LN, Jensen V, Jørgensen BB, Kjær ED, Skovsgaard JP. Hvad er asketoptørre? [cited 2014 Apr 21;];Skovdyrkeren. 2011 4:5–6. http://www.skovdyrkerne.dk/fileadmin/user_upload/Ost/dokumenter/Skovdyrker-nyt/Skovdyrkeren_OST_nr.4_reduc.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • Thüringer Landesanstalt für Wald, Jagd und Fischerei . Neuartiges Eschentriebsterben, Informationen für den Waldbesitzer. Gotha: 2010. [cited 2013 Nov 7;]. https://www.thueringen.de/de/publikationen/pic/pubdownload1139.pdf‎ [Google Scholar]
  • Timmermann V, Børja I, Hietala AM, Kirisits T, Solheim H. Ash dieback: pathogen spread and diurnal patterns of ascospore dispersal, with special emphasis on Norway. EPPO Bulletin. 2011;41:14–20. 10.1111/j.1365-2338.2010.02429.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Trail JWH. Report for 1887 of the fungi of the east of Scotland. Scottish Naturalist. 1887;9:167–174. [Google Scholar]
  • Trail JWH. Revision of Scotch Discomycetes. Trans Cryptogamic Soc Scotland. 1889;14:50–88. [Google Scholar]
  • Treigienė A, Markovskaja S, Kutorga E. Teleomorphic and anamorphic ascomycetes associated with European ash (Fraxinus excelsior) in Lithuania. Botanica Lithuanica. 2010;16(2–3):97–113. [Google Scholar]
  • Vasaitis R. New light on causes of ash decline. Scand J For Res News & Views. 2013;6:608–610. [Google Scholar]
  • Velenovský J. Monographia discomycetum Bohemiae, Pars II. Praha: The Author; 1934. [Google Scholar]
  • Velenovský J. Novitates mycologicae novissimae. (Opera Bot Čech 4) Prague: Societas Botanica Čechoslovaca; 1947. [Google Scholar]
  • Verkley GJM. Ultrastructure of the ascus apical apparatus in Hymenoscyphus and other genera of the Hymenoscyphoideae (Leotiales, Ascomycotina) Persoonia. 1993;15:303–340. [Google Scholar]
  • Wallander E. Systematics of Fraxinus (Oleaceae) and evolution of dioecy. Plant Syst Evol. 2008;273:25–49. 10.1007/s00606-008-0005-3. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Webber J, Hendry S. Rapid assessment of the need for a detailed pest risk analysis for Chalara fraxinea . [cited 2013 Nov 23;];2012 http://www.fera.defra.gov.uk/plants/plantHealth/pestsDiseases/documents/chalaraFraxinea.pdf
  • Weber E. Untersuchungen zu Fortpflanzung und Ploidie verschiedener Ascomyceten. (Bibliotheca Mycologica 140) Berlin: Cramer; 1992. p. 186 pp. [Google Scholar]
  • Whetzel HH. A synopsis of the genera and species of the Sclerotiniaceae, a family of stromatic inoperculate discomycetes. Mycologia. 1945;37:648–714. 10.2307/3755132. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • White WL. A monograph of the genus Rutstroemia (discomycetes) Lloydia. 1941;4:143–240. [Google Scholar]
  • White WL. Studies in the genus Helotium, I – A review of the species described by Peck. Mycologia. 1942;34:154–179. 10.2307/3754809. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • White WL. Studies in the genus Helotium, III – history and diagnosis of certain European and North American foliicolous species. Farlowia. 1943;1:135–170. [Google Scholar]
  • White WL. Studies in the genus Helotium, IV – some miscellaneous species. Farlowia. 1944;1:599–617. [Google Scholar]
  • Wiltshire JJJ, Wright CJ, Colls JJ, Craigon J, Unsworth MH. Some foliar characteristics of ash trees (Fraxinus excelsior) exposed to ozone episodes. New Phytol. 1996;134:623–630. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1996.tb04927.x. [Abstract] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang Y-H, Zhuang W-Y. Phylogenetic relationships of some members in the genus Hymenoscyphus (Ascomycetes, Helotiales) Nova Hedwigia. 2004;78:475–484. 10.1127/0029-5035/2004/0078-0475. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhao Y-J, Hosoya T, Baral H-O, Hosaka K, Kakishima M. Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus, the correct name for Lambertella albida reported from Japan. Mycotaxon. 2013;122:25–41. 10.5248/122.25. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zheng H-D, Zhuang W-Y. Hymenoscyphus albidoides sp. nov. and H. pseudoalbidus from China. Mycol Progress. 2014 10.1007/s11557-013-0945-z. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhuang W-Y. A few petiole-inhabiting discomycetes in China. Mycosystema. 1995 [1994];7:13–17. [Google Scholar]
  • Zhuang W-Y. Discomycetes of tropical China. VI. Additional species from Guanxi. Fungal Diversity. 1999;3:187–196. [Google Scholar]
  • Zhuang W-Y. Some new species and new records of discomycetes in China. X. Mycosystema. 2002;21:475–479. [Google Scholar]
  • Zhuang W-Y, Liu C-Y. Taxonomic reassessment of two taxa of helotialean fungi. Mycotaxon. 2007;99:123–131. [Google Scholar]
  • Zickler D, Arnaise S, Coppin E, Debuchy R, Picard M. Altered mating-type identity in the fungus Podospora anserina leads to selfish nuclei, uniparental progeny, and haploid meiosis. Genetics. 1995;140:493–503. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

Citations & impact 


Impact metrics

Jump to Citations

Citations of article over time

Alternative metrics

Altmetric item for https://www.altmetric.com/details/2817961
Altmetric
Discover the attention surrounding your research
https://www.altmetric.com/details/2817961

Smart citations by scite.ai
Smart citations by scite.ai include citation statements extracted from the full text of the citing article. The number of the statements may be higher than the number of citations provided by EuropePMC if one paper cites another multiple times or lower if scite has not yet processed some of the citing articles.
Explore citation contexts and check if this article has been supported or disputed.
https://scite.ai/reports/10.1080/21501203.2014.963720

Supporting
Mentioning
Contrasting
4
90
0

Article citations


Go to all (19) article citations

Data 


Data behind the article

This data has been text mined from the article, or deposited into data resources.

Similar Articles 


To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.